WITNESS STATEMENTS AND AVOIDING JAIL: ARE YOU PROTECTING YOUR CLIENTS AND PROTECTING YOURSELF?
In the recent case of Hughmans -v- Dunhill [2015] EWHC 716 (Ch) an interesting point arose about the drafting of a witness statement when a (former) client alleged that it had largely been drafted by her (former) solicitor. The assertion…
ITS NOT WHAT THE JUDGE SAID BUT THE WAY THAT THEY SAID IT: DISCUSSIONS FROM DOWN UNDER
The Supreme Court of South Australia made some interesting observations about the interaction between the bench and the bar in Stone -v- Moore [2015] SASC 46 (24th March 2015). In particular what does the appellate court do when a complaint…
FOOTBALL, SEX, INJUNCTIONS AND MATERIAL NON-DISCLOSURE: BE CAREFUL NOT TO GET ON THE JUDGE'S OFFSIDE
In YXB -v- TNO Mr Justice Warby set out the importance of full and frank disclosure on parties making an application for an ex-parte injunction. It also reiterates the importance of claimants giving direct evidence whenever possible and the dangers…
SOLICITOR FOUND TO HAVE DELIBERATELY MISLED THE COURT: BOREH -v- DJIBOUTI
In Boreh -v- Republic of Djibouti [2015] EWHC 769 (Comm) Mr Justice Flaux made a clear and unequivocal finding that a solicitor had deliberately misled the court. This led to the setting aside of the injunction that the clients had…
ASSESSING THE EVIDENCE ON A SUMMARY JUDGMENT APPLICATION: CRITICAL EXAMINATION OF THE RAW MATERIAL IS NECESSARY
In Calland -v- Financial Conduct Authority [2015] EWCA Civ 192 the Court of Appeal set out important principles to be considered when the court is considering an application for summary judgment. THE CASE The claimant brought an action under the…
PUTTING "WITHOUT PREJUDICE" ON LETTERS DOES NOT NECESSARILY MAKE THEM PRIVILEGED: AVONWICK -V- WEBINVEST IN THE COURT OF APPEAL
The case of Avonwick -v- Webinvest has been looked at before on this blog. Mr Justice David Richards held that letters asking for time to pay a debt were not covered by privilege just because they were headed “without prejudice”….
THE MITCHELL JUDGMENT 2: THE ROLE OF DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE
The judgment in the substantive Mitchell case has been examined several times on this blog. Not in relation to political and other ramifications but instead considering the judge’s analysis of the evidence. The previous post looked at the difficulties posed…
SOME THINGS MAY BE BETTER MEDIATED THAN LITIGATED: NEIGHBOUR DISPUTES FOR INSTANCE
There are some very important observations in the judgment of Norris J in the case of Bradley -v- Heslin [2014] EWHC 3276 (Ch) today. This was given in a neighbour dispute over access and gates which could have been remedied…
You must be logged in to post a comment.