APPEAL COURT CAN DECIDE ISSUES BETWEEN EXPERTS ON FOREIGN LAW: AND ANOTHER LOOK AT WITNESS STATEMENTS
The issue of when an appeal can court take its own view on expert evidence was considered in Group Seven Limited -v- Allied Investment Corporation Limited [2015] EWCA Civ 631. The judgment at first instance also makes for informative reading…
EVIDENCE, COSTS AND THE CREDIBILITY OF WITNESSES: A CANADIAN VIEW
This blog has discussed issues relating to the judicial approach of the credibility of witnesses many times. Some judges have, shall we say, not been backward in giving their views on the “value” of the evidence of some of the…
IF FINDINGS OF DISHONESTY ARE TO BE MADE THEN WITNESSES HAVE TO BE HEARD
Two cases in two days have shown the difficulties that arise when findings of dishonesty are made by judges without hearing evidence. Here we look at the difficulties that arose when a judge held a trial without hearing evidence and…
IF YOU CAN'T PROVE IT YOU DON'T GET IT: CALLING EVIDENCE AT COURT TO PROVE A LOSS: A WORKING EXAMPLE
A party claiming damages must bring evidence to court to prove the losses it claims. This is a simple statement. However adducing evidence which actually proves the losses claimed often gives rise to difficulties in all spheres of litigation. The…
LATE WITNESS STATEMENTS IN JUDICIAL REVIEW PROCEEDINGS: DON'T GO TO COLLEGE – JUST READ THE RULES
In R (on the application of the London College of Finance & Accounting) -v- Secretary of State for the Home Department [2015] EWHC 1688 (Admin) Mr Justice Cobb made some important observations in relation to the late service of evidence…
OPINION EVIDENCE IN WITNESS STATEMENTS AND THE CASE THAT MAY HAVE SPARKED OFF THE JACKSON REFORMS: Multiplex -v- Cleveland Bridge
Whilst doing some work on the problems caused when lay witnesses attempt to give expert evidence I came across the case of Multiplex Constructions (UK) LImited -v- Cleveland Bridge UK Limited [2008] EWHC 2220(TCC). It makes interesting reading for a…
WITNESS EVIDENCE, CLINICAL NEGLIGENCE AND CLINICAL NOTES: A CASE IN POINT
The judgment of Mr Justice Jay in FB -v- Rana & Princes Alexandra Hospital NHS Trust [2015] EWHC 1536 contains another interesting consideration of the value of witness evidence and contemporary records in a clinical negligence case. I was recently…
OVERTURNING FINDINGS OF FACTS AND "INFERENCES" ON APPEAL
In Vann -v-Ocidental [2015] EWCA Civ 572 the Court of Appeal overturned a finding that there was no contributory negligence. There is an interesting discussion about appeals on findings of fact and the inferences that the judge draws from those…
PHONE HACKING, MISSING DOCUMENTS AND THE ABSENT WITNESS: IMPORTANT ISSUES OF CIVIL EVIDENCE
The issues raised in the “phone hacking” trial are well known. However Mr Justice Mann also made some important observations about civil evidence. In particular the inferences to be drawn when witnesses are not called or evidence not available. These…
"TOUCH SENSITIVE" WITNESS STATEMENTS AND OTHER FORMS OF EVIDENCE: WHEN THE CLAIMANTS COLLECT THE EVIDENCE THEMSELVES
The decision of Recorder Amanda Michaels (sitting as a Deputy Enterprise Judge) in Minder Music Ltd -v- Sharples [2015] EWHC 1454 (IPEC) raises some interesting issues in relation to witness statements and evidence. In particular the problems when a party…
GET AN INJUNCTION – PAY £27 MILLION IN DAMAGES: A POINT WORTH REMEMBERING
The judgment in AstraZeneca AB -v- KRKA dd Novo Mesto [2015] EWCA Civ 484 is one that should be read by anyone thinking of applying for an injunction and giving an undertaking in damages. The claimant obtained an injunction and…
PROOF OF FACTS: THE BASIC PRINCIPLES SUMMARISED (BORROWING FROM THE FAMILY COURTS)
In a short judgment BR (Proof of Facts) [2015] EWFC 41 Mr Justice Peter Jackson provides a summary of key issues in relation to evidence. The judgment is specifically in relation fact finding in children cases. However part of the…
MORE ON "CHANGING" WITNESS STATEMENTS AND CREDIBILITY: A CLINICAL NEGLIGENCE CASE
A post yesterday commented upon the difficulties caused when a witness produces two (sometimes contradictory) witness statements. Another example of witness evidence leading to problems at trial can be seen in the judgment of HH Judge Collender QC (sitting as…
THAT "DIFFICULT SECOND STATEMENT": IT IS HARDLY EVER GOING TO BE A HIT
The judgment in Buswell -v- Symes [2015] EWHC 1379 (QB) illustrates the dangers of “supplementary “witness statements. Real problems can occur for the party putting in the new evidence. THE CASE The claimant was seriously injured when his motorcycle was…
LATE WITNESS EVIDENCE AND WITNESS CREDIBILITY IN THE INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY & ENTERPRISE COURT: HANDED OVER ON A PLATE?
The Intellectual Property Enterprise Court is likely to be a model of good practice. Basically designed to ensure the SMEs can protect their intellectual property rights without going broke in the process it has a fairly robust approach to procedure…
WITNESS STATEMENTS AND FUNDAMENTAL DISHONESTY: NOW THERE REALLY IS ONE LAW FOR THE RICH: THE PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS FOR CLAIMANT LAWYERS
There has been much debate about the impact of the “fundamental dishonesty” law. One practical effect it must have, however, is to ensure that claimant lawyers consider and explain the importance of the witness statement. THE ISSUE The problem with…
APPEALING ON THE JUDGE'S FINDINGS OF FACTS: A TRIAL IS NOT A DRESS REHEARSAL BUT "THE FIRST AND LAST NIGHT OF THE SHOW"
In the decision in Watson Farley and Williams -v- Ostrovizky today [2015] EWCA Civ 457 the Court of Appeal emphasised the difficulties of a party appealing findings of facts by the trial judge. “The aptness of the metaphor relating to…
WITNESS CREDIBILITY AND APPEALS: A COURT OF APPEAL DECISION
In Curran -v- Collins [2015] EWCA Civ 404 the Court of Appeal considered how an appellate court should approach issues of witness credibility. It is an example of a court dealing with a witness who, the judge finds, has “convinced…
WITNESS STATEMENTS AND AVOIDING JAIL: ARE YOU PROTECTING YOUR CLIENTS AND PROTECTING YOURSELF?
In the recent case of Hughmans -v- Dunhill [2015] EWHC 716 (Ch) an interesting point arose about the drafting of a witness statement when a (former) client alleged that it had largely been drafted by her (former) solicitor. The assertion…
ITS NOT WHAT THE JUDGE SAID BUT THE WAY THAT THEY SAID IT: DISCUSSIONS FROM DOWN UNDER
The Supreme Court of South Australia made some interesting observations about the interaction between the bench and the bar in Stone -v- Moore [2015] SASC 46 (24th March 2015). In particular what does the appellate court do when a complaint…
FOOTBALL, SEX, INJUNCTIONS AND MATERIAL NON-DISCLOSURE: BE CAREFUL NOT TO GET ON THE JUDGE'S OFFSIDE
In YXB -v- TNO Mr Justice Warby set out the importance of full and frank disclosure on parties making an application for an ex-parte injunction. It also reiterates the importance of claimants giving direct evidence whenever possible and the dangers…
SOLICITOR FOUND TO HAVE DELIBERATELY MISLED THE COURT: BOREH -v- DJIBOUTI
In Boreh -v- Republic of Djibouti [2015] EWHC 769 (Comm) Mr Justice Flaux made a clear and unequivocal finding that a solicitor had deliberately misled the court. This led to the setting aside of the injunction that the clients had…
ASSESSING THE EVIDENCE ON A SUMMARY JUDGMENT APPLICATION: CRITICAL EXAMINATION OF THE RAW MATERIAL IS NECESSARY
In Calland -v- Financial Conduct Authority [2015] EWCA Civ 192 the Court of Appeal set out important principles to be considered when the court is considering an application for summary judgment. THE CASE The claimant brought an action under the…
PUTTING "WITHOUT PREJUDICE" ON LETTERS DOES NOT NECESSARILY MAKE THEM PRIVILEGED: AVONWICK -V- WEBINVEST IN THE COURT OF APPEAL
The case of Avonwick -v- Webinvest has been looked at before on this blog. Mr Justice David Richards held that letters asking for time to pay a debt were not covered by privilege just because they were headed “without prejudice”….
THE MITCHELL JUDGMENT 2: THE ROLE OF DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE
The judgment in the substantive Mitchell case has been examined several times on this blog. Not in relation to political and other ramifications but instead considering the judge’s analysis of the evidence. The previous post looked at the difficulties posed…
SOME THINGS MAY BE BETTER MEDIATED THAN LITIGATED: NEIGHBOUR DISPUTES FOR INSTANCE
There are some very important observations in the judgment of Norris J in the case of Bradley -v- Heslin [2014] EWHC 3276 (Ch) today. This was given in a neighbour dispute over access and gates which could have been remedied…
You must be logged in to post a comment.