Civil Litigation Brief ®
Menu
  • Home
  • About
  • Membership Plans
  • Webinars
  • Login
Updates and Commentary on Civil Procedure, by Gordon Exall, Barrister, Kings Chambers
Browse: Home » 2021 » February » Page 2
TAKING APPROPRIATE STEPS WHEN A DEFENDANT DOES NOT HAVE CAPACITY: AN IMPORTANT WARNING

TAKING APPROPRIATE STEPS WHEN A DEFENDANT DOES NOT HAVE CAPACITY: AN IMPORTANT WARNING

February 5, 2021 · by gexall · in Appeals, Applications, Civil Procedure, Members Content

A real and profound warning about the dangers of issuing against someone without capacity is given in the judgment of  HHJ Hodge QC sitting as a judge of the High Court in Kumar v Hellard [2021] EWHC 181 (Ch).  …

RULE CHANGES COMING INTO FORCE IN APRIL 2021 (2): PART 36 OFFERS AND THE ACCRUAL OF INTEREST AFTER THE RELEVANT DATE FOR ACCEPTANCE

RULE CHANGES COMING INTO FORCE IN APRIL 2021 (2): PART 36 OFFERS AND THE ACCRUAL OF INTEREST AFTER THE RELEVANT DATE FOR ACCEPTANCE

February 5, 2021 · by gexall · in Costs, Members Content, Part 36, Rule Changes

The Civil Procedure (Amendment) Rules 2021 introduce a new CPR 36.5 (5)introduce a new rule as to offers and interest after the expiry of an offer. It enables the party making the offer to include provision for interest to accrue after…

THE RULES OF LITIGATION ARE DETAILED AND IMPORTANT: COURT REFUSES APPEAL - DEFENDANT'S ATTEMPT TO RE-LITIGATE HEARING WAS AN ABUSE OF PROCESS

THE RULES OF LITIGATION ARE DETAILED AND IMPORTANT: COURT REFUSES APPEAL – DEFENDANT’S ATTEMPT TO RE-LITIGATE HEARING WAS AN ABUSE OF PROCESS

February 4, 2021 · by gexall · in Appeals, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Setting aside judgment

The judgment of Collins Rice J in  Vafa v Patel [2021] EWHC 198 (QB) shows the importance of knowing and complying with the rules.  The judge dismissed an appeal where it had been held that a defendant’s attempt to re-litigate…

THE FAMILY COURT IS NOT THE HIGH COURT: SEVEN YEARS ON AND THERE IS STILL CONFUSION: MOSTYN J RE-STATES THE POSITION

February 4, 2021 · by gexall · in Case Management, Civil Procedure, Members Content

I am treading, warily, in the patch of the family law bloggers in looking at the judgment of Mr Justice Mostyn in TK v ML [2021] EWFC.  This is a judgment about procedure that highlights the point that the Family…

VULNERABLE WITNESSES IN CIVIL PROCEEDINGS: THE NEW RULES: WEBINAR 22nd MARCH 2021

February 4, 2021 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Members Content, Rule Changes, Webinar, Witness statements

I am presenting a webinar on the 22nd March 2021 dealing with the new rules relating to vulnerable witnesses in civil proceedings. The new rules are coming into force on the 6th April 2021.  These change the rules so that…

SERVICE OF THE CLAIM FORM AND THE PARTICULARS OF CLAIM: AVOIDING THE PITFALLS: WEBINAR 11th FEBRUARY 2021

SERVICE OF THE CLAIM FORM AND THE PARTICULARS OF CLAIM: AVOIDING THE PITFALLS: WEBINAR 11th FEBRUARY 2021

February 3, 2021 · by gexall · in Avoiding negligence claims, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Service of the claim form, Serving documents, Webinar

The problems that claimants face when serving the claim form are well documented on this blog.  I am presenting a webinar on the 11th February 2021 on identifying and avoiding the (many) pitfalls of service of the claim form and…

SOLICITORS SUING FOR THEIR COSTS AND SUMMARY JUDGMENT: THE AMOUNT OF DETAIL NEEDED IN THE BILL

SOLICITORS SUING FOR THEIR COSTS AND SUMMARY JUDGMENT: THE AMOUNT OF DETAIL NEEDED IN THE BILL

February 3, 2021 · by gexall · in Applications, Costs, Members Content, Personal Injury

In Devonshires Solicitors LLP v Elbishlawi & Anor [2021] EWHC 173 (Comm) Mr Justice Butcher considered the position when a solicitor was suing for their costs and the bill was challenged.  Summary judgment was allowed for some of the bills, other,…

INTERIM COSTS AWARD OF £8 MILLION: THE COURT IS WARY WHEN THE PAYING PARTY DOES NOT SHOW THEIR HAND...

INTERIM COSTS AWARD OF £8 MILLION: THE COURT IS WARY WHEN THE PAYING PARTY DOES NOT SHOW THEIR HAND…

February 2, 2021 · by gexall · in Costs, Interim Payments, Members Content

Our final look at the judgment of Mr Justice Turner in Municipio De Mariana & Ors v BHP Group PLC & Anor [2021] EWHC 146 (TCC). The judge had to determine the appropriate award for interim costs.  One interesting point…

COSTS NOT REDUCED BECAUSE OF THE WAY A DEFENDANT CONDUCTED ITS CASE: THE PRAGMATIC PRUNING OF A CASE SHOULD NOT BE DETERRED

COSTS NOT REDUCED BECAUSE OF THE WAY A DEFENDANT CONDUCTED ITS CASE: THE PRAGMATIC PRUNING OF A CASE SHOULD NOT BE DETERRED

February 2, 2021 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil Procedure, Conduct, Costs, Members Content

We are returning again (and not for the last time) to the judgment of Mr Justice Turner in Municipio De Mariana & Ors v BHP Group PLC & Anor [2021] EWHC 146 (TCC). This time we are looking at  the claimants’ argument…

RULE CHANGES COMING INTO FORCE IN APRIL 2021(1): VULNERABLE WITNESSES AND THE OVERRIDING OBJECTIVE

February 2, 2021 · by gexall · in Amendment, Civil evidence, Members Content, Rule Changes, Witness statements

There are some rule changes coming into force in April this year, introduced by the Civil Procedure (Amendment) Rules 2021, these come into force on the 6th April 2021. AMENDMENT TO THE OVERRIDING OBJECTIVE The new rules are referred to,…

BLOATED DRAFT GROUNDS OF APPEAL AND RELENTLESS DOCUMENTARY ATTRITION: NOT A GOOD START WHEN SEEKING PERMISSION TO APPEAL

BLOATED DRAFT GROUNDS OF APPEAL AND RELENTLESS DOCUMENTARY ATTRITION: NOT A GOOD START WHEN SEEKING PERMISSION TO APPEAL

February 1, 2021 · by gexall · in Appeals, Case Management, Civil Procedure, Members Content

The judgment of Mr Justice Turner in Municipio De Mariana & Ors v BHP Group PLC & Anor [2021] EWHC 146 (TCC) sets out the judge’s concerns in relation to the over-lengthy documents filed in support of an application for…

SOLICITOR DID NOT HAVE GOOD GROUNDS TO TERMINATE THE RETAINER UNDER A CFA: CLAIM FOR £16,200 IN COSTS FAILS

SOLICITOR DID NOT HAVE GOOD GROUNDS TO TERMINATE THE RETAINER UNDER A CFA: CLAIM FOR £16,200 IN COSTS FAILS

February 1, 2021 · by gexall · in Applications, Assessment of Costs, Conditional Fee Agreements, Conduct, Costs, Members Content

I am returning to the judgment of Master Haworth in  Murray & Anor v Richard Slade and Company Ltd [2021] EWHC B3 (Costs). This time looking at the decision in relation to termination of a conditional fee agreement. The Master held…

CIVIL PROCEDURE ROUND UP:  POSTS AND ARTICLES ON PROCEDURE AND COSTS: JANUARY 2021

CIVIL PROCEDURE ROUND UP: POSTS AND ARTICLES ON PROCEDURE AND COSTS: JANUARY 2021

February 1, 2021 · by gexall · in Case Management, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Costs, Members Content, Useful links

We all know that January has been a very long month. There has been much written about procedure and costs. Here is the first round up of the year. COSTS ACL – Master upholds default costs certificate in case where draftsman…

← Previous 1 2

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email. Subscription notifies you of a new post, it does not give you access to members' content.

Join 12.4K other subscribers

Recent Posts

  • AN INTRODUCTION TO THE CORONER’S COURT FOR PERSONAL INJURY AND CLINICAL NEGLIGENCE LAWYERS 2026: WEBINAR 17th JULY 2026
  • EXPERT WATCH 57: JUDGE DECIDES THAT AN EXPERT, THAT HAS NOT COMPLIED WITH THEIR DUTIES TO THE COURT, SHOULD BE NAMED; “HE HAD A CHOICE TO INVOLVE HIMSELF IN THESE PROCEEDINGS AND TO BE PAID FOR DOING SO…”
  • PERSONAL INJURY MATTERS 17(2): LIABILITY CATCHUP (2): A SUCCESSFUL STRESS AT WORK CLAIM CONSIDERED
  • A JUDGE SHOULD NOT HAVE PREVENTED A DEFENDANT TENANT SPEAKING AT A POSSESSION HEARING JUST BECAUSE THEY HAD NOT FILED A DEFENCE: THE CIVIL PROCEDURE RULES HAVE PRIMACY OVER A PEREMPTORY ORDER
  • WITNESS EVIDENCE WEDNESDAY: WHEN A LITIGATOR MAKES A STATEMENT ON BEHALF OF THEIR CLIENT: A USEFUL CHECKLIST ON THE SOURCE OF INFORMATION AND BELIEF

Top Posts

RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS: AS STRONGLY WORDED A REFUSAL AS I HAVE SEEN: THE CONCEPT "DOES NOT EMBODY A PRINCIPLE OF "BREACH NOW REPENT LATER"
A SOLICITOR SHOULD JUST NOT BE SAYING THIS IS IN A WITNESS STATEMENT: IT "STRAYED WELL BEYOND WHAT SHE COULD LEGALLY GIVE EVIDENCE ABOUT FROM HER OWN KNOWLEDGE INCLUDED HEARSAY FROM AN UNNAMED SOURCE AND INCLUDED STATEMENTS OF OPINION WHICH SHE DID NOT HAVE THE EXPERTISE TO GIVE..."
THE ONLINE PROCEDURE (RULES AND PRACTICE DIRECTIONS) RULES 2026 COME INTO FORCE ON THE 7th SEPTEMBER: HERE IS A SUMMARY (AND THE RULES THEMSLVES)
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND LITIGATION: AN UPDATE ON CONSULTATION FINDINGS FROM THE CIVIL JUSTICE COUNCIL
WHERE THINGS WENT WRONG IN LITIGATION (AND STOPPING IT HAPPENING TO YOU) 2: ADVISING A CLIENT THAT THEY ARE NOT LIABLE FOR COSTS BECAUSE PROCEEDINGS HAVE NOT BEEN SERVED

Archives

Blogroll

  • Fatal Accident Law
  • Legal Futures
  • Personal injury: Liability and Damages

Books

  • Munkman & Exall on Damages for Personal Injuries and Death 15th ed
  • The APIL Guide to Fatal Accidents 4th edition

Useful Links

  • Buntools (for preparing PDF Bundles)
  • Kings Chambers
  • Kings Chambers Costs & Litigation Funding
  • Kings Chambers Serious Injury
  • The Civil Procedure Rules
  • The Law Society Gazette
  • The National Archives Recently Published Judgments
  • The Senior Court Costs Office Guide 2025
  • www.Bailii.org

Copyright

© Gordon Exall, Exall Legal Training, Civil Litigation Brief, 2013-2026. Unauthorised use and or duplication of the material contained on this blog without permission is strictly prohibited.
Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.

To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
  • Membership Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Advertising Policy
  • Copyright
  • Legal Disclaimer

Copyright © 2026 Civil Litigation Brief ®

Powered by Big Yellow Workshop

Loading Comments...

You must be logged in to post a comment.