Civil Litigation Brief ®
Menu
  • Home
  • About
  • Membership Plans
  • Webinars
  • Login
Updates and Commentary on Civil Procedure, by Gordon Exall, Barrister, Kings Chambers
Browse: Home » 2025 » July » 04
PART 36, REFUSAL TO MEDIATE AND SHOULD A PARTY BE SUBJECT TO THE PART 36 PENALTIES WHEN AN OFFER WAS MADE TO THREE DEFENDANTS?

PART 36, REFUSAL TO MEDIATE AND SHOULD A PARTY BE SUBJECT TO THE PART 36 PENALTIES WHEN AN OFFER WAS MADE TO THREE DEFENDANTS?

July 4, 2025 · by gexall · in Civil Procedure, Costs, Mediation & ADR, Members Content, Part 36

What should the court do in a case where a Part 36 offer is made in relation to a number of defendants but the claimant only succeeds against one of them?  Can a failure to accept an offer of mediation…

CLAIMANT GRANTED RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS (ON APPEAL) FOLLOWING LATE SERVICE OF A COSTS BUDGET (TWO YEARS AND FIVE MONTHS LATE…): BUT AT A COST…

July 4, 2025 · by gexall · in Applications, Avoiding negligence claims, Civil Procedure, Costs, Members Content, Relief from sanctions

Cases relating to late service of the costs budget are still filtering through. Rarely, however,  does the failure extend over 2 years and 4 months as it does here. Despite the delay the claimant’s successfully appealed against the initial refusal…

COST BITES 252: WHEN CAN A SOLICITOR PROPERLY TERMINATE A RETAINER? WAS THE CLIENT "THROWN TO THE LIONS"?

COST BITES 252: WHEN CAN A SOLICITOR PROPERLY TERMINATE A RETAINER? WAS THE CLIENT “THROWN TO THE LIONS”?

July 4, 2025 · by gexall · in Assessment of Costs, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Costs

Here we are looking at a very small part of a judgment in relation to costs on a solicitor/own client assessment. On of the arguments put forward by the (former) client was that the retainer was wrongfully terminated shortly before…

WHEN CAN A JUDGE HEAR AN ISSUE THAT IS NOT "LISTED"?  THE ISSUES CONSIDERED IN THE HIGH COURT

WHEN CAN A JUDGE HEAR AN ISSUE THAT IS NOT “LISTED”? THE ISSUES CONSIDERED IN THE HIGH COURT

July 4, 2025 · by gexall · in Appeals, Applications, Avoiding negligence claims, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Relief from sanctions

If an action is listed for hearing on a specific issue when can the judge hear, and make an order in relation to a different issue?   This is an issue considered in the case we are looking at here.  The…

AVOIDING PROBLEMS IN CIVIL LITIGATION 1: HOW DOES ANYBODY MISS A LIMITATION PERIOD?

AVOIDING PROBLEMS IN CIVIL LITIGATION 1: HOW DOES ANYBODY MISS A LIMITATION PERIOD?

July 4, 2025 · by gexall · in Avoiding negligence claims, Civil Procedure, Limitation, Members Content

This is the first in the promised series about avoiding problems in civil litigation. The most obvious place to start is with limitation issues.   These sometimes prove particularly problematic for personal injury and clinical negligence lawyers. However there is no…

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email. Subscription notifies you of a new post, it does not give you access to members' content.

Join 12.4K other subscribers

Recent Posts

  • THE CURRENT IMPORTANCE OF PLEADINGS 103: “THE RESPONSIBILITY OF PLEADING THE CLAIM RESTS ON THE CLAIMANT” (OH, AND MATTERS CANNOT BE ADDED IN A SKELETON ARGUMENT SERVED THE DAY BEFORE TRIAL…)
  • THE POWER TO GRANT AN INJUNCTION NORMALLY REQUIRES A CAUSE OF ACTION: (ONE OF) THE DIFFICULTIES OF AN ANONYMOUS LITIGANT
  • THE CRITICAL IMPORTANCE OF COMPLYING WITH TIME LIMITS: “THERE WAS A WHOLESALE FAILURE TO ACKNOWLEDGE THE DEFAULTS”; “IT WAS ALL AS IF COMPLIANCE WERE OPTIONAL”
  • BACK TO BASICS MONDAY: THE PROBLEMS THAT CAN OCCUR WITH THE CONTENTS OF THE CLAIM FORM: TEN KEY POINTS
  • BOOK REVIEW: CRIMINAL INJURIES COMPENSATION: A PRACTITIONER’S GUIDE BY NEIL SUGARMAN

Top Posts

WRITING LETTERS TO THE JUDGE AFTER A DRAFT JUDGMENT IS CIRCULATED: "THIS IS ABOUT AS FAR AWAY FROM THE CONDUCT OF SOLICITORS CONDUCTING LITIGATION AS IT IS POSSIBLE TO GET"
FORM N1 HAS BEEN SLIGHTLY AMENDED: THIS COULD BE A TRAP FOR THE UNWARY: PUTTING THE DEFENDANT'S EMAIL ADDRESS ON THE CLAIM FORM DOES NOT CHANGE THE RULES FOR SERVICE...
PROVING THINGS 304 : FUNDAMENTAL DISHONESTY ESTABLISHED IN A £7 MILLION CLAIM: "THE WASTE OF PUBLIC RESOURCES CAUSED BY THE CLAIMANT'S DISHONESTY IS SCANDALOUS"
PROFESSIONAL NEGLIGENCE NEWS 6 : CLAIMANT FAILS TO PROVE SOLICITORS WERE NEGLIGENT IN ADVISING UPON SETTLEMENT (IN FACT IT FAILS TO PROVE A LOT OF OTHER MATTERS AS WELL...)
THE COURT REFUSES DEFENDANT'S APPLICATION FOR AN ORDER THAT THE CLAIMANT'S SOLICITORS CEASE TO ACT FOR HER: THERE IS NO AUTOMATIC CONFLICT AND EVIDENCE IS REQUIRED

Archives

Blogroll

  • Fatal Accident Law
  • Legal Futures
  • Personal injury: Liability and Damages

Books

  • Munkman & Exall on Damages for Personal Injuries and Death 15th ed
  • The APIL Guide to Fatal Accidents 4th edition

Useful Links

  • Buntools (for preparing PDF Bundles)
  • Kings Chambers
  • Kings Chambers Costs & Litigation Funding
  • Kings Chambers Serious Injury
  • The Civil Procedure Rules
  • The Law Society Gazette
  • The National Archives Recently Published Judgments
  • The Senior Court Costs Office Guide 2025
  • www.Bailii.org

Copyright

© Gordon Exall, Exall Legal Training, Civil Litigation Brief, 2013-2026. Unauthorised use and or duplication of the material contained on this blog without permission is strictly prohibited.
Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.

To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
  • Membership Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Advertising Policy
  • Copyright
  • Legal Disclaimer

Copyright © 2026 Civil Litigation Brief ®

Powered by Big Yellow Workshop

Loading Comments...

You must be logged in to post a comment.