DEFENDANT’S APPLICATION TO EXTEND TIME TO CHALLENGE COSTS PROVISIONS REFUSED: 21 DAYS WAS A SERIOUS AND SIGNIFICANT BREACH AND THERE WAS NO GOOD REASON FOR IT

Here we are looking at a case where the court refused the defendant's application to extend time when the defendant wanted to challenge the argument that costs were capped.  It was held that the defendant's delay of 21 days was serious and significant. Further the defendant had no good reason for no...

Enjoying this post?

Become a Civil Litigation Brief member to read full articles and access all premium content.

Become a member

Already a member? Log in below