EXPERT WATCH 36: THE JUDGE FINDS THAT EXPERT EVIDENCE IS “LITERALLY UNBELIEVABLE” (AND IT GETS WORSE…) “I MEAN, IT IS DISHONEST, FULL STOP”

We are used to seeing judicial criticism of experts on this site. We have an example here of a claimant's case coming to grief because the judge did not accept her evidence or the evidence of the two experts called to give evidence on her behalf. Both experts were subject to stringent criticism. The...

Enjoying this post?

Become a Civil Litigation Brief member to read full articles and access all premium content.

Become a member

Already a member? Log in below