EXPERT WATCH 43: WHEN AN EXPERT DOESN’T HAVE “REAL WORLD” EXPERIENCE OF THE MATTERS IN THEIR REPORT – THEY START ON THE BACK FOOT…

The previous post on costs and mediation led to me to look at the initial judgment on liability.   This is because the court considered an argument that the situation with the claimant's expert was so poor as to warrant indemnity costs.  The judge rejected that argument. However the primary judgment...

Enjoying this post?

Become a Civil Litigation Brief member to read full articles and access all premium content.

Become a member

Already a member? Log in below