EXPERT WATCH 57: JUDGE DECIDES THAT AN EXPERT, THAT HAS NOT COMPLIED WITH THEIR DUTIES TO THE COURT, SHOULD BE NAMED; “HE HAD A CHOICE TO INVOLVE HIMSELF IN THESE PROCEEDINGS AND TO BE PAID FOR DOING SO…”

Here we are looking at a decision related to the case we looked at yesterday relating to a medical expert in a family case.   The judge gave a decision on whether an expert, who she found had failed in their duty to the court, should be named in the publicly available judgment. "I observe that Mr Mi...

Enjoying this post?

Become a Civil Litigation Brief member to read full articles and access all premium content.

Become a member

Already a member? Log in below