COST BITES 433: WHAT ARE “SIGNIFICANT DEVELOPMENTS” WHEN YOU WANT TO VARY A COSTS BUDGET? WHY THERE WERE NO SUCH DEVELOPMENTS HERE

We are continuing our consideration at the appeal case where the defendant's appeal against a decision to vary the claimant's budget.  The first reason the appeal was successful was because the first instance judge found that there were no "significant developments"  which are essential if the court...

Enjoying this post?

Become a Civil Litigation Brief member to read full articles and access all premium content.

Become a member

Already a member? Log in below