COST BITES 454: PERSISTENT DISHONESTY LEADS TO INDEMNITY COSTS AGAINST ALL THE DEFENDANTS : “THEY WERE ALL IN IT TOGETHER”: LIMITED MEANS DID NOT JUSTIFY REFUSING AN ORDER FOR AN INTERIM PAYMENT OF COSTS

There are a number of costs issues considered in this judgment. Should indemnity costs be awarded? Should each defendant be liable to the same extent? Should the defendants' financial position play a part in the decision on costs? Should there be an interim payment as to costs.   Suffice to say that...

Enjoying this post?

Become a Civil Litigation Brief member to read full articles and access all premium content.

Become a member

Already a member? Log in below