Civil Litigation Brief ®
Menu
  • Home
  • About
  • Membership Plans
  • Webinars
  • Login
Updates and Commentary on Civil Procedure, by Gordon Exall, Barrister, Kings Chambers
Browse: Home » Appeals » Page 23
WISEMAN -V- MARSTON: COURT FEES CASE: TRANSCRIPT NOW AVAILABLE

WISEMAN -V- MARSTON: COURT FEES CASE: TRANSCRIPT NOW AVAILABLE

June 6, 2017 · by gexall · in Appeals, Applications, Court fees, Members Content, Striking out

The transcript of the judgment in the Wiseman -v- Marston case is now available. I have included it as an attachment to the previous posts on the case. The links are also available here. THE JUDGMENT AND COURT OF APPEAL…

WISEMAN -V- MARSTON: THE UNDERPAYMENT OF COURT FEES:  DEFENDANT'S APPLICATION FOR PERMISSION TO APPEAL REFUSED

WISEMAN -V- MARSTON: THE UNDERPAYMENT OF COURT FEES: DEFENDANT’S APPLICATION FOR PERMISSION TO APPEAL REFUSED

May 31, 2017 · by gexall · in Appeals, Court fees, Members Content, Striking out

In December last year I reported on the decision in Wiseman -v- Marston’s PLC (Sheffield County Court 21st December 2016). His Honour Judge Robinson allowed the claimant’s appeal in a case relating to payment of court fees. The defendant applied for…

DAMAGES, COSTS AND MEDIATION: COURT OF APPEAL CONSIDERS THE BOUNDARIES

DAMAGES, COSTS AND MEDIATION: COURT OF APPEAL CONSIDERS THE BOUNDARIES

May 24, 2017 · by gexall · in Appeals, Damages, Interest, Mediation, Mediation & ADR, Members Content

In  the judgment today Gore -v- Naheed [2017] EWCA 369 the Court of Appeal considered the issue of damages being awarded (when they had not been claimed) and where costs should lie when a party – reasonably – declined to…

A CLAIMANT CAN SUE AN UNNAMED DRIVER (AND THE INSURER HAS TO PAY): COURT OF APPEAL DECISION TODAY

A CLAIMANT CAN SUE AN UNNAMED DRIVER (AND THE INSURER HAS TO PAY): COURT OF APPEAL DECISION TODAY

May 23, 2017 · by gexall · in Amendment, Appeals, Applications, Insurance, Judgment, Members Content, Parties to actions

NB THIS DECISION WAS OVERTURNED BY THE SUPREME COURT IN Cameron v Liverpool Victoria Insurance Co Ltd [2019] UKSC 6 t In Cameron -v- Hussain [2017] EWCA Civ 366 the Court of Appeal (by a majority) considered the question whether a claimant…

APPEALS, TIME, SERVICE, VENUE: A REAL PROCEDURAL HOTCHPOTCH - EVEN BEFORE THE MAIN ISSUE IS CONSIDERED

APPEALS, TIME, SERVICE, VENUE: A REAL PROCEDURAL HOTCHPOTCH – EVEN BEFORE THE MAIN ISSUE IS CONSIDERED

May 23, 2017 · by gexall · in Appeals, Applications, Members Content, Relief from sanctions, Serving documents

The judgment of Mr Justice Jay in Enniful -v- Motor Insurers Bureau [2017] EWHC 1086 (QB) is a procedural hotchpotch. It relates to service, delay, dates of compliance, venue for appeals and relief from sanctions. All of this occurred before…

SERVICE OF DOCUMENTS II: SERVING AT AN ADDRESS THAT HAD BEEN VACATED (AND OVERTURNING FINDINGS OF FACT)

SERVICE OF DOCUMENTS II: SERVING AT AN ADDRESS THAT HAD BEEN VACATED (AND OVERTURNING FINDINGS OF FACT)

May 21, 2017 · by gexall · in Appeals, Members Content, Serving documents

In Grimes -v- The Trustees of the Essex Farmers and Union Hunt [2017] EWCA Civ 361 is another one of the batch of recent cases on service. The Court of Appeal considered the question of whether a document could be…

NO OBLIGATION TO RETURN STAGE ONE PROTOCOL COSTS: COURT OF APPEAL DECISION TODAY

NO OBLIGATION TO RETURN STAGE ONE PROTOCOL COSTS: COURT OF APPEAL DECISION TODAY

May 16, 2017 · by gexall · in Appeals, Costs, Members Content

In JC and A Solicitors Limited -v- Iqbal [2017] EWCA Civ 355 the Court of Appeal held that there is no obligation to repay costs paid at stage 1 on the Protocol when claimants failed to pursue the matter further….

BUNDLES IN THE SUPREME COURT: EXERCISING RESTRAINT

BUNDLES IN THE SUPREME COURT: EXERCISING RESTRAINT

May 11, 2017 · by gexall · in Appeals, Bundles, Members Content

There was a short postscript to the judgment of the Supreme Court in Poshteh v Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea [2017] UKSC 36> Lord Carnwath gave the single judgment. Even the Supreme Court complains about bundles. This adds to…

MEDIATION AND LITIGATION:  A REVIEW OF KEY CASES: IGNORE THEM AT YOUR PERIL

MEDIATION AND LITIGATION: A REVIEW OF KEY CASES: IGNORE THEM AT YOUR PERIL

May 7, 2017 · by gexall · in Appeals, Applications, Mediation, Mediation & ADR, Members Content

It is sometimes difficult to keep track of the cases that refer to mediation.  Given that ADR can play a central role in the litigation process this is an appropriate time to review the key cases, particularly in the light…

DUTY TO DRAW ADVERSE AUTHORITIES TO THE  ATTENTION OF THE COURT: HOW FAR DOES IT GO?

DUTY TO DRAW ADVERSE AUTHORITIES TO THE ATTENTION OF THE COURT: HOW FAR DOES IT GO?

May 5, 2017 · by gexall · in Appeals, Applications, Conduct, Members Content

The duty to draw the court’s attention to authorities that do not support your case is an important one.  In Weir -v- Hildson [2017] EWHC 983 (Ch) Mr Justice Nugee discusses the extent of this duty. THE CASE The applicant…

COURT OF APPEAL OVERTURNS FINDINGS OF FACT & CONSIDERS THE IMPORTANT ROLE OF THE SINGLE JOINT EXPERT

COURT OF APPEAL OVERTURNS FINDINGS OF FACT & CONSIDERS THE IMPORTANT ROLE OF THE SINGLE JOINT EXPERT

May 2, 2017 · by gexall · in Appeals, Damages, Expert evidence, Members Content, Witness statements

We have already looked at the decision in Perry -v- Raleys Solicitors [2017] EWCA Civ 314 in the context of the award of interest.   The decision also contains important observations about evidence and the way in which the courts approach…

BOUNDARIES, BORDERS AND COSTS: IF YOU LEAVE THE ISSUE OF COSTS TO THE JUDGE YOU MAY NOT GET THE ANSWER YOU WANT

BOUNDARIES, BORDERS AND COSTS: IF YOU LEAVE THE ISSUE OF COSTS TO THE JUDGE YOU MAY NOT GET THE ANSWER YOU WANT

April 25, 2017 · by gexall · in Appeals, Costs, Members Content

The judgment of the Court of Appeal in Powles -v- Reeves [2016] EWCA Civ 1375 shows the dangers of not being able to agree the principle of who should pay the costs of litigation. It shows the dangers of just…

APPLICATIONS TO AMEND APPEAL NOTICE AND PARTICULARS AT A LATE STAGE NOT ALLOWED BY THE COURT OF APPEAL

APPLICATIONS TO AMEND APPEAL NOTICE AND PARTICULARS AT A LATE STAGE NOT ALLOWED BY THE COURT OF APPEAL

April 24, 2017 · by gexall · in Amendment, Appeals, Applications, Civil Procedure, Limitation, Members Content

I am grateful to Jill Greenfield from Field Fisher  for sending me a copy of the Court of Appeal transcript in Howe -v- Motor Insurers Bureau (CA 8th February 2017). This is a judgment refusing permission to amend and for…

MERRIX NOT BEING APPEALED (BUT HARRISON IS - WATCH THIS SPACE)

MERRIX NOT BEING APPEALED (BUT HARRISON IS – WATCH THIS SPACE)

April 22, 2017 · by gexall · in Appeals, Assessment of Costs, Costs, Costs budgeting, Members Content

The decision in Merrix -v- Heart of England NHS Foundation Trust [2017] EWHC 346 (QB) is not being appealed by the defendant. The rationale is, apparently, that the defendant did not want to risk losing the listing of the appeal in Harrison…

BE CAREFUL WHAT YOU WRITE: THE SUPREME COURT MAY READ IT ONE DAY (AND IT MAY END UP ON A BLOG SOMEWHERE...)

BE CAREFUL WHAT YOU WRITE: THE SUPREME COURT MAY READ IT ONE DAY (AND IT MAY END UP ON A BLOG SOMEWHERE…)

April 14, 2017 · by gexall · in Appeals, Conduct, Members Content

There has already been some interesting debate on Twitter about one aspect of the Supreme Court decision in Times -v- Flood [2017] UKSC 33 that has not made the headlines.   Dominic Regan observed that the case is another example…

DELAY, DENTON, APPEALS AND CROSS-APPEALS: EXTENSION OF TIME WOULD HAVE BEEN GRANTED

DELAY, DENTON, APPEALS AND CROSS-APPEALS: EXTENSION OF TIME WOULD HAVE BEEN GRANTED

April 13, 2017 · by gexall · in Appeals, Extensions of time, Members Content, Relief from sanctions

In Pinisetty -v-Manikonda [2017] EWHC 838 (QB) Mr Justice Langstaff considered an issue relating to an appeal (and cross-appeal)  being out of time. Although the judgment on this issue is largely academic (the appeal failed in any event), it contains…

RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS GRANTED TO DEFENDANT WHO APPEARED BY COUNSEL: A "SURPRISING STATE OF AFFAIRS" PUT RIGHT

RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS GRANTED TO DEFENDANT WHO APPEARED BY COUNSEL: A “SURPRISING STATE OF AFFAIRS” PUT RIGHT

April 11, 2017 · by gexall · in Appeals, Civil evidence, Members Content, Relief from sanctions

There may well be a term for the process by which a number of decisions, which appeared sensible at the time they were made, lead to a ridiculous result. This principle may well apply to what happened in Falmouth House…

PROVING THINGS 60: PUTTING SEAWEED OUT OF THE WINDOW:  THE ABSENCE OF EVIDENCE AND THE JUDGE WHO WAS EVEN-HANDEDLY OFFENSIVE:

PROVING THINGS 60: PUTTING SEAWEED OUT OF THE WINDOW: THE ABSENCE OF EVIDENCE AND THE JUDGE WHO WAS EVEN-HANDEDLY OFFENSIVE:

April 9, 2017 · by gexall · in Appeals, Civil evidence, Members Content

The Court of Appeal judgment in McBride -v- UK Insurance Ltd [2017] EWCA Civ 144 has been covered widely on the issue of the appropriate rate for car hire charges after an accident. However less widely discussed is the fact that,…

JUDICIAL INTERVENTION, INTERRUPTIONS AND HOT TUBBING: JUDICIAL LATITUDE IS NOT UNLIMITED

JUDICIAL INTERVENTION, INTERRUPTIONS AND HOT TUBBING: JUDICIAL LATITUDE IS NOT UNLIMITED

April 6, 2017 · by gexall · in Appeals, Case Management, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Expert evidence, Members Content

In Shaw -v- Grouby [2017] EWCA Civ 233 the Court of Appeal made some observations about the dangers of a judge getting too inquisitorial in the course of a trial, particularly in the course of cross-examination. “The judge intervened in…

THE TRIAL JUDGE AND FINDINGS OF FACT:  COURT OF APPEAL DID NOT OVERTURN FINDINGS OF TRIAL JUDGE

THE TRIAL JUDGE AND FINDINGS OF FACT: COURT OF APPEAL DID NOT OVERTURN FINDINGS OF TRIAL JUDGE

April 1, 2017 · by gexall · in Appeals, Civil evidence, Members Content, Witness statements

A disappointed insurer failed in its attempt to overturn findings of a trial judge in Hamid -v- Khalid [2017] EWCA Civ 201. “The task of a trial judge is difficult enough without having to deal expressly with every single piece…

WHEN THE EVIDENCE OF THE "INDEPENDENT" WITNESS IS NOT ACCEPTED: WHEN WE WILL EVER LEARN?

WHEN THE EVIDENCE OF THE “INDEPENDENT” WITNESS IS NOT ACCEPTED: WHEN WE WILL EVER LEARN?

March 30, 2017 · by gexall · in Appeals, Civil evidence, Members Content, Witness statements

In a case where there are disputed facts a party that has an independent witness usually holds a strong hand.  However in Elson -v- Stilgoe [2017] EWCA Civ 193 today the Court of Appeal upheld a decision where the trial…

INTERIM PAYMENTS ON ACCOUNT OF COSTS:  READ (AND CITE) THE CORRECT CHAPTER OF COOK ON COSTS

INTERIM PAYMENTS ON ACCOUNT OF COSTS: READ (AND CITE) THE CORRECT CHAPTER OF COOK ON COSTS

March 28, 2017 · by gexall · in Appeals, Costs, Interim Payments, Members Content

 I am grateful to John McQuater for sending me a copy of an order from HH Judge Robinson,  It relates to an application on account of costs.  The appeal was (for obvious reasons) compromised. However the robust terms of the…

A JUDGE CANNOT GIVE PERMISSION TO APPEAL AFTER THE HEARING: MONROE -v- HOPKINS - SECOND ROUND

A JUDGE CANNOT GIVE PERMISSION TO APPEAL AFTER THE HEARING: MONROE -v- HOPKINS – SECOND ROUND

March 28, 2017 · by gexall · in Adjournments, Appeals, Members Content

The case of Monroe -v- Hopkins [2017] EWHC 645 (QB) is the second judgment on the case. The judgment today related solely to the defendant’s application for permission to appeal. The judge ruled that he did not have jurisdiction to…

INTEREST ON DAMAGES AFTER FAILING TO BEAT A CLAIMANT'S PART 36 OFFER: THE AIM IS TO ENCOURAGE GOOD PRACTICE AND NOT SIMPLY TO COMPENSATE

INTEREST ON DAMAGES AFTER FAILING TO BEAT A CLAIMANT’S PART 36 OFFER: THE AIM IS TO ENCOURAGE GOOD PRACTICE AND NOT SIMPLY TO COMPENSATE

March 28, 2017 · by gexall · in Appeals, Costs, Damages, Members Content, Part 36

In Ovm Petrom SA -v- Glencore International SA [2017] EWCA Civ 195 the Court of Appeal overturned a decision not to award 10% interest on damages in a case where a defendant failed to beat a claimant’s Part 36 offer….

RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS GRANTED AFTER SECRETARY OF STATE RELIED UPON AN OUTDATED REFERENCE IN THE WHITE BOOK

RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS GRANTED AFTER SECRETARY OF STATE RELIED UPON AN OUTDATED REFERENCE IN THE WHITE BOOK

March 26, 2017 · by gexall · in Appeals, Extensions of time, Members Content, Relief from sanctions

In AM (Pakistan) -v- Secretary of State for the Home Department [2017] EWCA Civ 180 the Court of Appeal granted relief after an appeal was filed late.  The appellant had relied upon an out of date commentary in the white…

ADJOURNMENTS, ILL HEALTH, FAIRNESS AND THE DENTON PRINCIPLES: COURT OF APPEAL UPHOLDS CASE MANAGEMENT DECISIONS

ADJOURNMENTS, ILL HEALTH, FAIRNESS AND THE DENTON PRINCIPLES: COURT OF APPEAL UPHOLDS CASE MANAGEMENT DECISIONS

March 22, 2017 · by gexall · in Adjournments, Appeals, Applications, Case Management, Members Content, Relief from sanctions

In Dove -v- London Borough of Havering [2017] EWCA Civ 156 the Court of Appeal considered a number of procedural issues prior to giving judgment on the substantive point.  The defendants argued that they should have been granted an adjournment of…

APPEAL JUDGE OVERTURNS FINDINGS OF KNOWLEDGE IN AN ACTION AGAINST THE MIB

APPEAL JUDGE OVERTURNS FINDINGS OF KNOWLEDGE IN AN ACTION AGAINST THE MIB

March 21, 2017 · by gexall · in Appeals, Civil evidence, Members Content, Witness statements

In Whyatt -v- Powell & the Motor Insurers Bureau [2017] EWHC 484 (QB) Mr Justice Lewis overturned the findings of the trial judge that three claimants had knowledge that a driver was not insured.  The judgment considers what inferences a…

RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS: COURT OF APPEAL ALLOWS APPEAL AND  GRANTS RELIEF WHEN THE ORIGINAL ORDER WAS PRE-DENTON

RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS: COURT OF APPEAL ALLOWS APPEAL AND GRANTS RELIEF WHEN THE ORIGINAL ORDER WAS PRE-DENTON

March 17, 2017 · by gexall · in Appeals, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Relief from sanctions

It is surprising, perhaps embarrassing, that the Court of Appeal is still hearing appeals where the judge at first instance applied the pre-Denton approach to relief from sanctions. However a judgment today involved just that*.  In Patterson -v- Spencer [2017]…

COURT OF APPEAL: REFUSAL TO ENGAGE WITH AN OPEN OFFER  OF SETTLEMENT IS AN ABUSE OF PROCESS

COURT OF APPEAL: REFUSAL TO ENGAGE WITH AN OPEN OFFER OF SETTLEMENT IS AN ABUSE OF PROCESS

March 10, 2017 · by gexall · in Appeals, Applications, Conduct, Litigants in person, Members Content, Risks of litigation

In Balk -v- Otkrite International Investment [2017] EWCA the Court of Appeal was highly critical of a litigant’s failure to respond to an open offer of settlement of appeal. The failure to engage  with an open offer of settlement amounted…

LATE SKELETON ARGUMENTS, ADJOURNMENTS AND THE OVERRIDING OBJECTIVE

LATE SKELETON ARGUMENTS, ADJOURNMENTS AND THE OVERRIDING OBJECTIVE

March 9, 2017 · by gexall · in Adjournments, Appeals, Members Content, Written advocacy

In Owgilo -v- The General Medical Council [2017] EWHC 419(Admin) Mr Justice Dove considered the situation when a witness statement was served late and the applicant requested an adjournment.  The overriding objective played a prominent part in the decisions made….

WHAT A DIFFERENCE A DAY MAKES: ACTION BROUGHT IN TIME:  COURT'S EARLIER REFUSAL TO EXTEND DISCRETION TO EXTEND TIME OVERTURNED

WHAT A DIFFERENCE A DAY MAKES: ACTION BROUGHT IN TIME: COURT’S EARLIER REFUSAL TO EXTEND DISCRETION TO EXTEND TIME OVERTURNED

March 9, 2017 · by gexall · in Appeals, Applications, Limitation, Members Content

The judgment of the Court of Appeal in Otuo -v- Watchtower Bible and Tract Society of Britain [2017] EWCA Civ 136 shows the importance of calculating time periods for limitation. It shows what a difference a day makes KEY POINTS…

HIGH COURT WRITES AN OPEN LETTER TO LITIGANTS IN PERSON: STRIKING OUT CAN BE A BENEFIT NOT A BURDEN

HIGH COURT WRITES AN OPEN LETTER TO LITIGANTS IN PERSON: STRIKING OUT CAN BE A BENEFIT NOT A BURDEN

March 3, 2017 · by gexall · in Appeals, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Striking out

There are aspects of the judgment of Mr Justice Walker in Chambers -v- Rooney [2017] EWHC 285 (QB) that amount to an open letter from the High Court to litigants in person. Some of the observations are aimed at everyone…

PREVENTING DEFENDANT FROM DEFENDING DAMAGES IS AN APPROPRIATE MEANS OF ENFORCING PEREMPTORY ORDERS: COURT OF APPEAL DECISION

PREVENTING DEFENDANT FROM DEFENDING DAMAGES IS AN APPROPRIATE MEANS OF ENFORCING PEREMPTORY ORDERS: COURT OF APPEAL DECISION

February 27, 2017 · by gexall · in Appeals, Damages, Members Content, Peremptory orders

 Workman -v- Forrester [2017] EWCA Civ 73 is an important example of the courts using peremptory orders in an attempt to secure compliance.  The Court of Appeal upheld a decision to make a peremptory order that allowed the claimants to…

MERRIX ON APPEAL TO THE HIGH COURT JUDGE: COSTS BUDGETING IS AS DEFINITIVE FOR PAYING PARTY AS IT IS FOR RECEIVING PARTY: JUDGMENT TODAY

MERRIX ON APPEAL TO THE HIGH COURT JUDGE: COSTS BUDGETING IS AS DEFINITIVE FOR PAYING PARTY AS IT IS FOR RECEIVING PARTY: JUDGMENT TODAY

February 24, 2017 · by gexall · in Appeals, Costs, Costs budgeting, Members Content

In the judgment today in Merrix -v- Heart of England NHS Foundation Trust [2017] EWHC 346 (QB) Mrs Justice Carr allowed an appeal about the significance of costs budgeting when it comes to assessment. “In my judgment, the answer to…

SEXUAL ABUSE AND SECTION 33 OF THE LIMITATION ACT: COURT OF APPEAL OVERTURNS JUDGE’S ORDER

February 22, 2017 · by gexall · in Appeals, Limitation, Members Content

In Archbishop Michael George Bowen -v- JL [2017] EWCA Civ 82 the Court of Appeal overturned a judge’s decision under section 33 of the Limitation Act 1980.  The judge had exercised the discretion in favour of the claimant. On appeal…

THE DUTY ON EX PARTE APPLICATIONS: SOLICITOR INVOLVED NOT ALLOWED TO APPEAL TO THE COURT OF APPEAL AGAINST FINDINGS AGAINST HIM

February 12, 2017 · by gexall · in Appeals, Applications, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Conduct, Injunctions, Members Content

I am returning to the question of the lawyer’s duty on without notice applications. In March 2015 we looked at the case of Boreh -v- Republic of Djibouti [2015] EWHC 769 (Comm)  where Mr Justice Flaux made a clear and unequivocal…

TRIAL JUDGE’S REJECTION OF EXPERT WITNESS CREDIBILITY UPHELD BY THE COURT OF APPEAL: IF AN EXPERT KNOWS A PARTY THEY SHOULD SAY SO

February 10, 2017 · by gexall · in Appeals, Civil evidence, Clinical Negligence, Conduct, Expert evidence, Experts, Members Content

In EXP -v- Barker [2017]  EWCA Civ 63 the Court of Appeal upheld the trial judge’s rejection of the evidence of an expert witness. “the starting point is to identify what the judge decided. He considered that the witness had…

ORAL CLOSING SUBMISSIONS ARE IMPORTANT: USE OF WRITTEN SUBMISSIONS IS “UNSATISFACTORY”

February 10, 2017 · by gexall · in Appeals, Members Content, Written advocacy

In Pimlico Plumbers Ltd -v- Smith [2017] EWCA Civ 51 the Court of Appeal stated that oral closing submissions are important. Relying on written submissions alone represents a “considerable risk”. THE CASE The Court of Appeal was considering an appeal…

E-DISCLOSURE: UNLESS ORDERS: STRIKING OUT, COMPLIANCE AND DENTON: DEFENDANTS COME TO GRIEF

February 2, 2017 · by gexall · in Appeals, Disclosure, Members Content, Relief from sanctions

There is a lot to consider in the judgment today of Mr Justice Green in Micheal -v- Phillips [2017] EWHC 42 (QB). It relates to inadequate disclosure; retention of electronic documents; peremptory orders and relief from sanctions. Things did not…

A COUNTERCLAIM IS SUBJECT TO THE SAME RULES AS LIMITATION AS A CLAIM: SECTION 35 OF THE LIMITATION ACT CONSIDERED BY THE COURT OF APPEAL

February 1, 2017 · by gexall · in Appeals, Limitation, Members Content

In the judgment today in  Al-Rawas -v- Hassan Khan (A Firm) [2017] EWCA Civ 42 the Court of Appeal held that a counterclaim did not have any special status under the Limitation Act. It was subject to the same principles as…

FIXED COSTS APPLY TO APPLICATIONS FOR PRE-ACTION DISCLOSURE: COURT OF APPEAL DECISION TODAY

February 1, 2017 · by gexall · in Appeals, Applications, Costs, Disclosure, Members Content, QOCS

The Court of Appeal judgment today in Sharp -v- Leeds City Council [2017] EWCA Civ 33 deals with an important point about fixed costs and applications for pre-action disclosure. KEY POINTS An application for pre-action disclosure made by a claimant…

IF YOU DECIDE NOT TO TURN UP FOR COURT DON'T EXPECT MUCH SYMPATHY: COUNCIL TOLD TO GET ON ITS BIKE

IF YOU DECIDE NOT TO TURN UP FOR COURT DON’T EXPECT MUCH SYMPATHY: COUNCIL TOLD TO GET ON ITS BIKE

January 26, 2017 · by gexall · in Appeals, Applications, Members Content

The judgment  of the Court of Appeal in Camden Borough Council -v- Humphreys [2017] EWCA Civ 24 illustrates the danger of  a party deciding not to attend a hearing. THE CASE A recipient of a parking ticket, Mr Humphreys,  had…

LIMITATION, EXTENSIONS AND THE HUMAN RIGHTS ACT: COURT OF APPEAL SAYS NO

January 26, 2017 · by gexall · in Appeals, Extensions of time, Limitation, Members Content

For the second time within a week we have a case where the courts consider the discretion to extend time under s.7(5)(a) of the Human Rights Act 1998.  In London Borough of Hackney -v- Williams [2017] EWCA Civ 26 the…

APPEALS, COUNTER-SCHEDULES AND A RESERVE POSITION: NOT MANNA FOR THE DEFENDANTS

January 18, 2017 · by gexall · in Admissions, Appeals, Damages, Members Content, Schedules, Statements of Case

We will be looking at the Court of Appeal decision in Manna -v- Central Manchester Hospitals NHS Trust [2017]  EWCA Civ 12 twice today.  Here I want to look at the difficulties the defendant had in arguing a point in…

"UNNECESSARY, UNHELPFUL & UNACCEPTABLE" : OVER-LONG SKELETON ARGUMENTS – AGAIN.

January 6, 2017 · by gexall · in Appeals, Members Content, Skeleton arguments, Uncategorized

There have been a series of judgments in the civil courts, notably from Jackson L.J., commenting on the length of skeleton arguments.  The criminal courts are not immune. In R -v- Brandford [2016] EWCA Crim 1749 the Court of Appeal…

CIVIL LITIGATION REVIEW OF 2016: PROMISCUOUS BUNDLES & THAT CRAZY LITTLE THING CALLED PROPORTIONALITY

December 28, 2016 · by gexall · in Appeals, Applications, Assessment of Costs, Avoiding negligence claims, Bundles, Case Management, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Conduct, Costs, Credibility of experts, Experts, Fundamental Dishonesty, Injunctions, Members Content, Uncategorized, Witness statements

This is the third annual review of the year on this blog. 2016, as ever, has been an interesting year.  As ever, a comprehensive review can be found in Herbert Smith Freehills A litigator’s yearbook: 2016 (England and Wales). PREDICTIONS…

PAYING THE CORRECT COURT FEE, AMENDMENT & STRIKING OUT: ANOTHER DECISION

December 23, 2016 · by gexall · in Amendment, Appeals, Applications, Civil Procedure, Court fees, Members Content, Striking out, Uncategorized

There have been a number of cases in relation to the consequences for a claimant when the correct court fee has not been paid upon issue.  This issue was considered by His Honour Judge Robinson this week in an appeal…

CIVIL COMMITTAL PROCEEDINGS: STILL A MATTER FOR GRAVE CONCERN

December 6, 2016 · by gexall · in Appeals, Members Content, Uncategorized

I have written several times about the problems in obtaining representation and funding for civil committal proceedings.   The judgement of the Court of Appeal yesterday in Devon County Council -v- Kirk [2016] EWCA Civ 1221 exemplifies the difficulties and…

CIVIL PROCEDURE: THE BEHRENS' EFFECT

November 27, 2016 · by gexall · in Appeals, Applications, Case Management, Civil evidence, Members Content, Uncategorized

His Honour Judge Behrens, the resident Chancery judge in Leeds, retires tomorrow. This led me to consider the contribution he has made to civil procedure. JOHN BEHRENS AT THE BAR I could begin by telling of the  meticulous neatness of…

WITNESS STATEMENTS & DISCLOSURE: OMISSIONS MEAN THAT CASE FAILS AT SECOND HURDLE AND HAS TO GO BACK TO THE START

November 24, 2016 · by gexall · in Appeals, Disclosure, Members Content, Uncategorized, Witness statements

S  When a proponent of proportionate litigation, such as Jackson L.J., orders a retrial in a case where the judgment was for £4,449 the case merits examination. In Knowles -v- Watson [2016] EWCA Civ 1122 a re-trial was ordered because…

← Previous 1 … 22 23 24 … 29 Next →

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email. Subscription notifies you of a new post, it does not give you access to members' content.

Join 12.3K other subscribers

Recent Posts

  • IF YOU ARE ASKING FOR AN EXPEDITED TRIAL – MAKE SURE YOU ARE AVAILABLE…: JUDGE SAYS THE PARTIES SHOULD HAVE CHECKED THIS ISSUE
  • COST BITES 398: MORE BUDGETING IN THE MERCEDES-BENZ LITIGATION: ONLY A “MODEST” REDUCTION OF £1 MILLION HERE: BUT WHY (THE COURT ASKS) WEREN’T REALISTICALLY REDUCED FIGURES PUT FORWARD IN THE FIRST PLACE?
  • THROWBACK FRIDAY: “ADVOCACY – THE JUDGE’S VIEW: “AVOID BULLSHIT, SMOKE AND MIRRORS” (OH AND “WELL PADDED VANITY” (JUNE 2016
  • WHOSE EXPERT EVIDENCE IS GOING TO BE ACCEPTED AT TRIAL? (CLINICAL NEGLIGENCE): WEBINAR 10th JUNE 2026
  • COST BITES 397: THE PARTIES THAT SPENT £500,000 IN A DISPUTE THAT WAS WORTH £5,000: THE JUDGE FOUND GOOD REASON TO DEPART FROM THE DEFENDANT’S COSTS BUDGET (A CASE I WOULD ENCOURAGE EVERY LITIGATOR TO READ)

Top Posts

  • A FIRM OF SOLICITORS ISSUED PROCEEDINGS WITHOUT AUTHORITY TO DO SO: ORDERED TO PAY £900,000 ON ACCOUNT OF COSTS: SOME EXPENSIVE LESSONS HERE...
  • COST BITES 386: THREATS TO REPORT THE DEFENDANTS' SOLICITORS TO THE SRA WAS ONE OF THE REASONS THE CLAIMANT HAD TO PAY COSTS ON AN INDEMNITY BASIS: WEAPONISERS BEWARE
  • ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND THE CITATION OF MISLEADING AUTHORITIES: ANOTHER WEEK, ANOTHER CASE: IF YOUR NAME IS ON THE DOCUMENT YOU "OWN" IT...
  • THROWBACK FRIDAY: LAWYERS FAILURE TO PROVIDE OVERSIGHT OF EXPERTS LEADS TO EXCLUSION OF THEIR EVIDENCE: EXPERT EVIDENCE IS “NOT A MATTER OF RIGHT” (MAY 2021)
  • COST BITES 385: THE COURTS SHOULD BE WARY OF DECIDING PRELIMINARY APPLICATIONS AND ISSUES ON A PROVISIONAL ASSESSMENT: THIS COULD UNDERMINE THE WHOLE PURPOSE OF THE REGIME

Archives

Blogroll

  • Fatal Accident Law
  • Legal Futures
  • Personal injury: Liability and Damages

Books

  • Munkman & Exall on Damages for Personal Injuries and Death 15th ed
  • The APIL Guide to Fatal Accidents 4th edition

Useful Links

  • Buntools (for preparing PDF Bundles)
  • Kings Chambers
  • Kings Chambers Costs & Litigation Funding
  • Kings Chambers Serious Injury
  • The Civil Procedure Rules
  • The Law Society Gazette
  • The National Archives Recently Published Judgments
  • The Senior Court Costs Office Guide 2025
  • www.Bailii.org

Copyright

© Gordon Exall, Exall Legal Training, Civil Litigation Brief, 2013-2026. Unauthorised use and or duplication of the material contained on this blog without permission is strictly prohibited.
Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.

To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
  • Membership Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Advertising Policy
  • Copyright
  • Legal Disclaimer

Copyright © 2026 Civil Litigation Brief ®

Powered by Big Yellow Workshop

Loading Comments...

You must be logged in to post a comment.