Civil Litigation Brief
Menu
  • Home
  • About
  • Membership Plans
  • Webinars
  • Login
Updates and Commentary on Civil Procedure, by Gordon Exall, Barrister, Kings Chambers
Browse: Home » Avoiding negligence claims » Page 14
GUIDANCE ON CORONAVIRUS FOR ADVOCATES FROM THE BAR COUNCIL (AND THE NEED FOR A CLEAR STATEMENT FROM THE BAR STANDARDS BOARD)

GUIDANCE ON CORONAVIRUS FOR ADVOCATES FROM THE BAR COUNCIL (AND THE NEED FOR A CLEAR STATEMENT FROM THE BAR STANDARDS BOARD)

March 16, 2020 · by gexall · in Applications, Avoiding negligence claims, Members Content

The Bar Council website has useful guidance on dealing with Coronavirus, this is in a section on its website here.    GUIDANCE GIVEN ON THE 16th MARCH 2020 This guidance is available from a link on the page, also here….

RECOGNISING THAT 99.8% OF LITIGATORS ARE STARK RAVING BONKERS:  (A REPOST)

RECOGNISING THAT 99.8% OF LITIGATORS ARE STARK RAVING BONKERS: (A REPOST)

March 5, 2020 · by gexall · in Avoiding negligence claims, Case Management, Members Content, Service of the claim form, Serving documents

This is post that was originally written in May 2014.  It followeda talk I gave in Leeds “How to get sued, Make a Loss and be Miserable”.  It led to the sharing of ideas between the 40 litigators who attended. …

THE IMPORTANCE OF THE STATEMENT OF TRUTH (2): WHY LAWYERS SHOULD THINK (MORE THAN TWICE) BEFORE SIGNING IT

THE IMPORTANCE OF THE STATEMENT OF TRUTH (2): WHY LAWYERS SHOULD THINK (MORE THAN TWICE) BEFORE SIGNING IT

February 17, 2020 · by gexall · in Avoiding negligence claims, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Statements of Truth

Given the imminent changes to the statement of truth this is a good time to consider the problems that can occur when a lawyer signs a statement of truth on behalf of their client.  There are some cases that make…

WITNESS STATEMENTS, WITNESS EVIDENCE AND SELF-PROTECTION FOR THE LAWYER

WITNESS STATEMENTS, WITNESS EVIDENCE AND SELF-PROTECTION FOR THE LAWYER

February 5, 2020 · by gexall · in Avoiding negligence claims, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Conduct, Members Content, Witness statements

Every few years I repeat advice given in relation to the need for “self-protection” when drafting witness statements.  This is often caused by something I have seen in practice, questions I am asked, or a transcript of a case.  The…

STAYING SANE AS A LITIGATOR 9: SHARING THE "PAIN"

STAYING SANE AS A LITIGATOR 9: SHARING THE “PAIN”

February 4, 2020 · by gexall · in Avoiding negligence claims, Civil Procedure, Expert evidence, Experts, Extensions of time, Members Content, Well being

Most of the burden of complying with time periods and court orders lies with the solicitor. However a solicitor’s life can be made easier by making sure that all those concerned with the litigation process know of the deadlines involved…

GDPR AND THE CIVIL LITIGATOR (1) : USEFUL LINKS FOR LITIGATORS

GDPR AND THE CIVIL LITIGATOR (1) : USEFUL LINKS FOR LITIGATORS

February 4, 2020 · by gexall · in Avoiding negligence claims, Disclosure, Members Content, Useful links

The post earlier this week that highlighted the fact that an applicant had spent £40,000 unsuccessfully trying to obtain documents that would have been freely available under GDPR has led me to contemplate a series of articles on litigators and…

ADEQUATE TIME ESTIMATES: WAS THIRTY MINUTES LONG ENOUGH?

ADEQUATE TIME ESTIMATES: WAS THIRTY MINUTES LONG ENOUGH?

January 22, 2020 · by gexall · in Appeals, Applications, Avoiding negligence claims, Members Content

One other aspect of the judgment HHJ Lethem in Ivanoy -v- Lubble (Central London County Court 17th January 2020) relates to time estimates. It highlights the importance of giving appropriate time estimates, reviewing the estimate if the matter becomes complex and the…

APPLICATIONS FOR RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS: 10 KEY POINTS

APPLICATIONS FOR RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS: 10 KEY POINTS

January 14, 2020 · by gexall · in Applications, Avoiding negligence claims, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Relief from sanctions, Witness statements

We are now nearly six years on from the Denton decision and the principles are familiar to most litigators.  However applications for relief from sanctions are still a regular occurrence.  Success is never guaranteed. Here I want to look again at…

2019 AND CIVIL PROCEDURE - A ROUND UP OF THE ROUND UPS: WHAT TO FRET ABOUT AND WHAT NOT TO FRET ABOUT...

2019 AND CIVIL PROCEDURE – A ROUND UP OF THE ROUND UPS: WHAT TO FRET ABOUT AND WHAT NOT TO FRET ABOUT…

December 31, 2019 · by gexall · in Assessment of Costs, Avoiding negligence claims, Bundles, Case Management, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Committal proceedings, Costs, Costs budgeting, Credibility of experts, Expert evidence, Experts, Members Content, Useful links, Witness statements, Written advocacy

There have been a series of annual reviews on key topics throughout December.  To round off the year it seemed a good idea to provide a reminder of them all and put the links in one place 2019 AND CIVIL…

2019 AND CIVIL PROCEDURE THE YEAR IN REVIEW: WELL BEING: LOOKING AFTER OURSELVES SO WE CAN LOOK AFTER OTHERS

2019 AND CIVIL PROCEDURE THE YEAR IN REVIEW: WELL BEING: LOOKING AFTER OURSELVES SO WE CAN LOOK AFTER OTHERS

December 23, 2019 · by gexall · in Avoiding negligence claims, Members Content, Well being

This year has seen a large number of posts on avoiding stress and dealing with the difficulties that lawyers can have in litigation.   MARCH: FIND MUGGLES AND DISCONNECT FROM YOUR WORK: “LAWYERS JUST NEED TO HAVE FUN” March had…

HIGH COURT ALLOWS RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS APPEAL FAILING A FAILURE TO PAY THE TRIAL FEE ON TIME

HIGH COURT ALLOWS RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS APPEAL FAILING A FAILURE TO PAY THE TRIAL FEE ON TIME

December 9, 2019 · by gexall · in Appeals, Applications, Avoiding negligence claims, Civil Procedure, Court fees, Members Content, Relief from sanctions

In Badejo v Cranston [2019] EWHC 3343 (Ch) Mr Justice Fancourt overturned the decision of a Circuit Judge and granted relief from sanctions to a claimant who had failed to pay the trial fee in time.   One issue related to…

2O19 AND CIVIL PROCEDURE THE YEAR IN REVIEW (5): WITH A LITTLE HELP FROM MY FRIENDS - CONTRIBUTIONS FROM TWITTER

2O19 AND CIVIL PROCEDURE THE YEAR IN REVIEW (5): WITH A LITTLE HELP FROM MY FRIENDS – CONTRIBUTIONS FROM TWITTER

December 9, 2019 · by gexall · in Avoiding negligence claims, Members Content, Well being

This year has seen a number of posts where contributions have been drawn from Twitter threads, with people accepting invitations to write on particular points.  The advice is usually practical and sometimes profound.  This is an appropriate time to remind…

2019 AND CIVIL PROCEDURE - THE YEAR IN REVIEW (3): SANCTIONS AND RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS (OR NOT...)

2019 AND CIVIL PROCEDURE – THE YEAR IN REVIEW (3): SANCTIONS AND RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS (OR NOT…)

December 5, 2019 · by gexall · in Applications, Avoiding negligence claims, Members Content, Relief from sanctions

Another certainty about writing about civil procedure is that every year will bring a batch of applications relating to sanctions and relief from sanctions.  This year has been no different.  We start off (from the end of last year) with…

CIVIL PROCEDURE BACK TO BASICS 73: THE AUTOMATIC STAY

CIVIL PROCEDURE BACK TO BASICS 73: THE AUTOMATIC STAY

December 2, 2019 · by gexall · in Avoiding negligence claims, Civil Procedure, Members Content

CPR 15,11(2) provides for an automatic stay if nothing happens in an action for six months after service.  This is a rule that can be overlooked.   THE RULE CPR rule 15.11. Sub-paragraph (1) of that rule provides that: “Where…

SERVICE OF THE PARTICULARS OF CLAIM AND THE "TRAP FOR THE UNWARY CLAIMANT": THE TRAP OPERATED AND RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS NOT GRANTED

SERVICE OF THE PARTICULARS OF CLAIM AND THE “TRAP FOR THE UNWARY CLAIMANT”: THE TRAP OPERATED AND RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS NOT GRANTED

November 18, 2019 · by gexall · in Applications, Avoiding negligence claims, Members Content, Relief from sanctions, Service of the claim form, Uncategorized

The judgment of Chief Master Marsh today in Maggistro-Contenta & Anor v O’Shea & Anor [2019] EWHC 3035 (Ch) is a prime example of difficulties being caused because of a mistake in relation to the rules relating to service.   It…

STAYING SANE AS A LITIGATOR 6: WORKLOAD: THE IDEAL CASELOAD OR "BURY EVERYBODY" - WHICH IS MORE PROFITABLE?

STAYING SANE AS A LITIGATOR 6: WORKLOAD: THE IDEAL CASELOAD OR “BURY EVERYBODY” – WHICH IS MORE PROFITABLE?

November 4, 2019 · by gexall · in Applications, Avoiding negligence claims, Members Content, Useful links, Well being

This is unlikely to be the last post on this topic.  Workload is likely to be the main source of stress for most litigators. The very basic issue of what is an appropriate caseload for litigators is often complained about…

STAYING SANE AS A LITIGATOR 5: THINGS WILL GO WRONG: "YOU GOTTA HAVE A PLAN": DON'T CRASH...

STAYING SANE AS A LITIGATOR 5: THINGS WILL GO WRONG: “YOU GOTTA HAVE A PLAN”: DON’T CRASH…

October 31, 2019 · by gexall · in Applications, Avoiding negligence claims, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Professional negligence,, Relief from sanctions, Service of the claim form, Serving documents, Setting aside judgment, Witness statements

No matter how hard you try, on occasions, things will go wrong in litigation.  Do you have a plan?  Here we examine the need to have a plan to cover default and other issues in litigation. We then look in…

"IF COURT PROCEEDINGS ARE SERVED ON A SOLICITOR WITHOUT AUTHORITY - IS THAT GOOD SERVICE?": A QUESTION WITH AN EASY ANSWER

“IF COURT PROCEEDINGS ARE SERVED ON A SOLICITOR WITHOUT AUTHORITY – IS THAT GOOD SERVICE?”: A QUESTION WITH AN EASY ANSWER

October 29, 2019 · by gexall · in Applications, Avoiding negligence claims, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Service of the claim form, Serving documents

“If court proceedings are served on a solicitor without authority is that good service” was a search that led to this blog yesterday.  This is a question with a very easy answer.  This blog has looked at this issue several…

PROSPECTIVE APPLICATIONS FOR EXTENSIONS OF TIME (CONSTITUTIONAL LAWYERS DO NOT GET EXCITED)

PROSPECTIVE APPLICATIONS FOR EXTENSIONS OF TIME (CONSTITUTIONAL LAWYERS DO NOT GET EXCITED)

October 28, 2019 · by gexall · in Applications, Avoiding negligence claims, Case Management, Civil Procedure, Extensions of time, Members Content, Relief from sanctions

Today seems a good day to consider prospective applications for extensions of time. These are going to figure in every litigators career at some point.  A knowledge of the relevant law is essential. A prospective application of time is dealt…

STAYING SANE AS A LITIGATOR 4: : A HALLOWEEN SPECIAL: KNOWING THE EVERYONE HAS LITIGATION NIGHTMARES

STAYING SANE AS A LITIGATOR 4: : A HALLOWEEN SPECIAL: KNOWING THE EVERYONE HAS LITIGATION NIGHTMARES

October 26, 2019 · by gexall · in Avoiding negligence claims, Members Content, Relief from sanctions, Well being

Litigation gives rise to its own pressures. Every litigator with any degree of experience will have horror stories.  I thought it worthwhile repeating the advice given by the lawyers of Twitter for Halloween a few years back. You will see…

STAYING SANE AS A LITIGATOR 2: FISH FILES AND HOW TO FILLET THEM

STAYING SANE AS A LITIGATOR 2: FISH FILES AND HOW TO FILLET THEM

October 21, 2019 · by gexall · in Avoiding negligence claims, Case Management, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content

We have looked at “fish files” several times on this blog, and with good reason. A “fish file” is a file that has been left for so long it has started to smell. Consequently the litigator avoids it and it…

THE BACK TO BASICS SERIES: A RUNNING ACCOUNT: READ THEM ALL HERE

THE BACK TO BASICS SERIES: A RUNNING ACCOUNT: READ THEM ALL HERE

October 17, 2019 · by gexall · in Appeals, Applications, Assessment of Costs, Avoiding negligence claims, Bundles, Case Management, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Costs, Costs budgeting, Experts, Limitation, Members Content, QOCS, Relief from sanctions, Serving documents, Statements of Case, Statements of Truth, Witness statements

  The “Back to Basics” series, as the title suggests, deals with some of the basic elements of civil procedure. It covers everything from applications and bundles to the taking of witness statements.  The titles are often prompted by elements…

STAYING SANE AS A LITIGATOR 1: "OWN YOUR MISTAKES"

STAYING SANE AS A LITIGATOR 1: “OWN YOUR MISTAKES”

October 16, 2019 · by gexall · in Avoiding negligence claims, Conduct, Members Content

Today I am speaking at the Motor Accidents Solicitors Society annual conference on the topic of “Avoiding a Breakdown – Helping Your Clients by Helping Yourself”.  I thought this would be a good day to start a new series on…

DEFENDANTS - WAKE UP, SERIOUSLY:  A "VERY RELAXED" ATTITUDE TO THE RULES WILL COST YOUR CLIENTS DEAR: APPLICATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE A DEFENCE REFUSED: REFUSAL CONFIRMED ON APPEAL

DEFENDANTS – WAKE UP, SERIOUSLY: A “VERY RELAXED” ATTITUDE TO THE RULES WILL COST YOUR CLIENTS DEAR: APPLICATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE A DEFENCE REFUSED: REFUSAL CONFIRMED ON APPEAL

October 4, 2019 · by gexall · in Appeals, Applications, Avoiding negligence claims, Case Management, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Relief from sanctions

In Joan Angela Kember v (As Personal Representative of the Estate of Leonard John Kember, Deceased And On Her Own Behalf And On Behalf of His Dependants) [2019] EWHC 2297 (QB) Mrs Justice Lambert upheld a refusal to grant a…

CIVIL PROCEDURE BACK TO BASICS 65: THAT NIGHTMARE SCENARIO WHERE THE COURT HAS ISSUED THE CLAIM FORM BUT YOU CAN'T SERVE IT

CIVIL PROCEDURE BACK TO BASICS 65: THAT NIGHTMARE SCENARIO WHERE THE COURT HAS ISSUED THE CLAIM FORM BUT YOU CAN’T SERVE IT

October 2, 2019 · by gexall · in Avoiding negligence claims, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Service of the claim form

Here I want to isolate one aspect of the judgment in AAA -v- Rakoff [2019] EWHC 2525 (QB) that was easy to miss amidst all the features of that case.  The fact that the court can issue proceedings and hold onto…

SERVE YOUR EVIDENCE IN RESPONSE VERY LATE IN THE DAY - WHAT IS THE COURT GOING TO THINK?

SERVE YOUR EVIDENCE IN RESPONSE VERY LATE IN THE DAY – WHAT IS THE COURT GOING TO THINK?

September 26, 2019 · by gexall · in Applications, Avoiding negligence claims, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content

In Gregory & Anor v Moore & Ors [2019] EWHC 2430 (Ch)  Chief Master Marsh commented upon evidence served in response, but very late in the day.   In the absence of an explanation in relation to late service the Master…

AUTOMATICALLY CREATED NAME AT THE FOOT OF AN EMAIL CREATES BINDING CONTRACT TO SELL LAND: "MANY THANKS" FOR THIS

AUTOMATICALLY CREATED NAME AT THE FOOT OF AN EMAIL CREATES BINDING CONTRACT TO SELL LAND: “MANY THANKS” FOR THIS

September 25, 2019 · by gexall · in Applications, Avoiding negligence claims, Members Content, Witness statements

The judgment of HHJ Pearce in Neocleous & Anor v Rees [2019] EWHC 2462 (Ch) is not about procedure.  However it is a judgment that many litigators must become familiar with. An automatically generated name at the end of an…

LAWYERS GIVING EVIDENCE 3: THE SOLICITOR (GIVING EVIDENCE WHILST REPRESENTING HIS CLIENTS) HAD BECOME FAR TOO CLOSE TO THE CASE TO BE OBJECTIVE

LAWYERS GIVING EVIDENCE 3: THE SOLICITOR (GIVING EVIDENCE WHILST REPRESENTING HIS CLIENTS) HAD BECOME FAR TOO CLOSE TO THE CASE TO BE OBJECTIVE

September 24, 2019 · by gexall · in Avoiding negligence claims, Civil evidence, Members Content, Witness statements

In the third post on the dangers of lawyers giving evidence we are looking at the judgment of Recorder Monty QC in   Afia v Mellor & Anor [2013] EW Misc 23 (CC). The only witness called for the defendants was…

CIVIL PROCEDURE BACK TO BASICS 64: THE AUTOMATIC STAY (EASY TO FORGET ABOUT)

CIVIL PROCEDURE BACK TO BASICS 64: THE AUTOMATIC STAY (EASY TO FORGET ABOUT)

September 20, 2019 · by gexall · in Avoiding negligence claims, Civil Procedure, Members Content

Here we look at the automatic stay imposed by CPR 15.11. This is one of those rules than can be overlooked and could, if ignored, cause major procedural difficulties. THE RULES “Where – (a) at least 6 months have expired…

ONE PLUG: COURT FEES - AVOIDING THE PITFALLS: WEBINAR 25th SEPTEMBER 2019

ONE PLUG: COURT FEES – AVOIDING THE PITFALLS: WEBINAR 25th SEPTEMBER 2019

September 16, 2019 · by gexall · in Avoiding negligence claims, Civil Procedure, Courses, Court fees, Members Content

Just one plug this time. For the webinar on Court Fees on the 25th September. COURT FEES: AVOIDING THE PITFALLS On the 25th September at 1.pm, I am giving a webinar “Court fees: Avoiding the pitfalls – fees, fee remission, abuse…

CIVIL PROCEDURE BACK TO BASICS 62: ASKING LEADING QUESTIONS WHEN INTERVIEWING WITNESSES - CAN (OR WILL) LEAD TO PROBLEMS

CIVIL PROCEDURE BACK TO BASICS 62: ASKING LEADING QUESTIONS WHEN INTERVIEWING WITNESSES – CAN (OR WILL) LEAD TO PROBLEMS

September 16, 2019 · by gexall · in Avoiding negligence claims, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Witness statements

Examination in chief is rare in civil cases, many (perhaps most) practitioners will never have seen it done in court.   There is a rule against asking leading questions  when taking a witness through their evidence.   There is a good reason…

WEBINARS: (1) LOSS OF EARNINGS (2) COURT FEES - AVOIDING THE PITFALLS: TWO PLUGS

WEBINARS: (1) LOSS OF EARNINGS (2) COURT FEES – AVOIDING THE PITFALLS: TWO PLUGS

September 3, 2019 · by gexall · in Applications, Avoiding negligence claims, Courses, Court fees, Damages, Members Content, Striking out

Just a brief reminder of two webinars this month: one on loss of earnings, the other on court fees and associated issues. CLAIMS FOR LOSS OF EARNINGS This webinar “Claims for loss of earnings: law, procedure and evidence, prove it…

AVOIDING NEGLIGENCE CLAIMS IN LITIGATION 11: PROCEDURE: AN EIGHT POINT SURVIVAL GUIDE

AVOIDING NEGLIGENCE CLAIMS IN LITIGATION 11: PROCEDURE: AN EIGHT POINT SURVIVAL GUIDE

August 27, 2019 · by gexall · in Avoiding negligence claims, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Extensions of time, Members Content

Here we have a short eight point guide on some of the key problem areas in relation to procedure once proceedings have been issued. Rule 1: Have everything ready pre-issue and have a plan. Effectively this means that you have,…

AVOIDING NEGLIGENCE CLAIMS IN LITIGATION 10: "DEFENSIVE LITIGATION": PROTECT AND SURVIVE

AVOIDING NEGLIGENCE CLAIMS IN LITIGATION 10: “DEFENSIVE LITIGATION”: PROTECT AND SURVIVE

August 22, 2019 · by gexall · in Avoiding negligence claims, Members Content

In the 10th post in this series we consider the concept of “defensive litigation”, that is what positive steps litigators can take to avoid problems occurring. THE LIST: DEFENSIVE LITIGATION This list is based on a talk I gave in…

CIVIL PROCEDURE BACK TO BASICS 59: WHEN A CLIENT DISOWNS THEIR OWN WITNESS STATEMENT? SELF PROTECTION FOR THE LAWYER

CIVIL PROCEDURE BACK TO BASICS 59: WHEN A CLIENT DISOWNS THEIR OWN WITNESS STATEMENT? SELF PROTECTION FOR THE LAWYER

August 20, 2019 · by gexall · in Avoiding negligence claims, Members Content, Witness statements

There has been much discussion on Twitter tonight in relation to the language used in witness statements. That led to this account being given by “Sweary Expat” a lawyer based in the Cayman Islands (some people clearly have to suffer…

AVOIDING NEGLIGENCE CLAIMS IN LITIGATION 9: SERVICE OF THE CLAIM FORM (3): SERVICE AT THE LAST KNOWN ADDRESS

AVOIDING NEGLIGENCE CLAIMS IN LITIGATION 9: SERVICE OF THE CLAIM FORM (3): SERVICE AT THE LAST KNOWN ADDRESS

August 13, 2019 · by gexall · in Applications, Avoiding negligence claims, Members Content, Service of the claim form, Serving documents

Staying with  issues relating to service of the claim form we are looking at another common source of error –  service at the “last known address”.   The key point here is that a claimant cannot simply serve at the “last…

AVOIDING NEGLIGENCE CLAIMS IN LITIGATION 8: SERVICE OF THE CLAIM FORM (2) - SERVICE ON SOLICITORS (OR NOT)

AVOIDING NEGLIGENCE CLAIMS IN LITIGATION 8: SERVICE OF THE CLAIM FORM (2) – SERVICE ON SOLICITORS (OR NOT)

August 12, 2019 · by gexall · in Avoiding negligence claims, Members Content, Service of the claim form, Serving documents

We have looked at the problem of service on solicitors many times, including several cases where claimants have come to grief.  Anyone proposing to serve on a solicitor must know the basic rules. In some circumstances it is mandatory to…

RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS GRANTED WHEN WITNESS AND EXPERT EVIDENCE SERVED LATE : EXPLAIN DELAY EVEN IF THERE IS NO GOOD REASON FOR IT

RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS GRANTED WHEN WITNESS AND EXPERT EVIDENCE SERVED LATE : EXPLAIN DELAY EVEN IF THERE IS NO GOOD REASON FOR IT

August 9, 2019 · by gexall · in Applications, Avoiding negligence claims, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Relief from sanctions

In Castle Trustees Ltd -v-Bombay Palace Restaurant Ltd [2017] EWHC 3893 (TCC) Mrs Justice Jefford allowed the defendant’s application for relief from sanctions when the defendant served witness and expert evidence late. This case is interesting for a number of…

AVOIDING NEGLIGENCE CLAIMS IN LITIGATION 7: SERVICE OF THE CLAIM FORM (1) - TIME (SIT UP AND PAY ATTENTION NOW NON-PI LAWYERS)

AVOIDING NEGLIGENCE CLAIMS IN LITIGATION 7: SERVICE OF THE CLAIM FORM (1) – TIME (SIT UP AND PAY ATTENTION NOW NON-PI LAWYERS)

August 7, 2019 · by gexall · in Avoiding negligence claims, Members Content, Service of the claim form

The previous post in this series have been primarily of interest to personal injury lawyers.  Matters relating to service of the claim form relate to virtually all litigators. Indeed the majority of disputed cases in relation to service appear to…

AVOIDING NEGLIGENCE CLAIMS IN LITIGATION 6: MAKE SURE YOUR CLIENT IS NOT BANKRUPT (& KNOW WHAT TO DO IF THEY ARE)

AVOIDING NEGLIGENCE CLAIMS IN LITIGATION 6: MAKE SURE YOUR CLIENT IS NOT BANKRUPT (& KNOW WHAT TO DO IF THEY ARE)

August 6, 2019 · by gexall · in Avoiding negligence claims, Civil Procedure, Insolvency, Members Content

Many litigants don’t tell their lawyers that they are bankrupt. Some firms ask as a matter of course, many do not. Some litigators do not appreciate the impact of personal bankruptcy on a litigant. A CASE TO POINT:  A TRIAL,…

AVOIDING NEGLIGENCE CLAIMS IN LITIGATION 6: ACCIDENTS ABROAD ARE SUBJECT TO DIFFERENT LIMITATION PERIODS

August 6, 2019 · by gexall · in Avoiding negligence claims, Limitation, Members Content

In the sixth in this series we look at accidents abroad.  In most cases the limitation period of the country where the accident occurred is the limitation period that applies.  A lack of knowledge of this basic point, and of…

AVOIDING NEGLIGENCE CLAIMS IN LITIGATION 5: BE WARY OF EVERYTHING THAT HAPPENS ON WATER: BOATS AND SHIPS (& GANGWAYS)

AVOIDING NEGLIGENCE CLAIMS IN LITIGATION 5: BE WARY OF EVERYTHING THAT HAPPENS ON WATER: BOATS AND SHIPS (& GANGWAYS)

August 4, 2019 · by gexall · in Applications, Avoiding negligence claims, Limitation, Members Content

  In the fifth in this updated series we are looking at the different time periods that apply when an accident occurs on, or even near, water. The aim, as ever, is to flag these issues up so that (as…

AVOIDING NEGLIGENCE CLAIMS IN LITIGATION 4: AVIATION, PLANES, AIRPORTS AND BALLOONS: VICIOUS RULES APPLY

AVOIDING NEGLIGENCE CLAIMS IN LITIGATION 4: AVIATION, PLANES, AIRPORTS AND BALLOONS: VICIOUS RULES APPLY

July 30, 2019 · by gexall · in Avoiding negligence claims, Limitation, Members Content, Personal Injury

This is the fourth in the series. The purpose of this post is to make you feel really uncomfortable when you are involved with a case that involves aviation and personal injury, in any way shape or form. Including when…

AVOIDING NEGLIGENCE CLAIMS IN LITIGATION 3: 10 MYTHS ABOUT LIMITATION THAT EVERY PERSONAL INJURY LAWYER SHOULD KNOW

AVOIDING NEGLIGENCE CLAIMS IN LITIGATION 3: 10 MYTHS ABOUT LIMITATION THAT EVERY PERSONAL INJURY LAWYER SHOULD KNOW

July 29, 2019 · by gexall · in Avoiding negligence claims, Limitation, Members Content

Here we look at ten “myths” (that is misconceptions) about limitation that can lead to personal injury litigators getting into difficulties. Myth 1:  In a breach of contract case the limitation period is six years.  This is clearly a prevalent…

AVOIDING NEGLIGENCE CLAIMS IN LITIGATION 2: HOW DO YOU MISS THE THREE YEAR LIMITATION PERIOD?

AVOIDING NEGLIGENCE CLAIMS IN LITIGATION 2: HOW DO YOU MISS THE THREE YEAR LIMITATION PERIOD?

July 28, 2019 · by gexall · in Avoiding negligence claims, Limitation, Members Content, Personal Injury

This series looks at avoiding negligence claims in litigation, personal injury litigation in particular.  The easiest (and most common) method of a negligence claim is missing the limitation period. How does anyone miss a three year limitation period?  The basic…

AVOIDING NEGLIGENCE CLAIMS IN LITIGATION: A LAWYER'S GUIDE: PREFACE FOR THE SERIES

AVOIDING NEGLIGENCE CLAIMS IN LITIGATION: A LAWYER’S GUIDE: PREFACE FOR THE SERIES

July 24, 2019 · by gexall · in Applications, Avoiding negligence claims, Members Content

I am re-writing  and expanding upon an earlier series of posts on the topic of  avoiding negligence claims.  This is mainly aimed at personal injury practitioners, however many of the posts relate to procedure and will be of more general…

CIVIL PROCEDURE BACK TO BASICS 56: ADVISING ON THE RISKS OF LITIGATION: "CLIENTS WANT TWO INCONSISTENT THINGS"

CIVIL PROCEDURE BACK TO BASICS 56: ADVISING ON THE RISKS OF LITIGATION: “CLIENTS WANT TWO INCONSISTENT THINGS”

July 23, 2019 · by gexall · in Avoiding negligence claims, Members Content, Risks of litigation

The difficulties facing those giving advice about litigation is summed up in a judgment of Sedley LJ  “Clients, I know, want two inconsistent things. They want confident advice on which they can act, and they want cautionary advice about the…

CIVIL PROCEDURE BACK TO BASICS 55: THE 70 KEY POINTS OF THE DENTON JUDGMENT

CIVIL PROCEDURE BACK TO BASICS 55: THE 70 KEY POINTS OF THE DENTON JUDGMENT

July 21, 2019 · by gexall · in Applications, Avoiding negligence claims, Case Management, Members Content, Relief from sanctions

The judgment in Denton -v- White [2014] EWCA Civ 906 was given five years ago. It is a case that is still cited daily in the courts. It can be misunderstood or misquoted. Here are the 70 key points of this…

ADVICE TO A NEWLY QUALIFIED LITIGATOR 3: THINGS WILL GO WRONG, ADMIT IT, DEAL WITH IT AND NEVER, EVER, EVER ATTEMPT TO HIDE IT

ADVICE TO A NEWLY QUALIFIED LITIGATOR 3: THINGS WILL GO WRONG, ADMIT IT, DEAL WITH IT AND NEVER, EVER, EVER ATTEMPT TO HIDE IT

July 15, 2019 · by gexall · in Avoiding negligence claims, Members Content, Well being

At sometime in everybody’s legal career there is likely to be a situation when mistakes are made and everything points to you. Mathew Hickey puts the point succinctly in Rocket Lawyer “There will be moments in your legal career when things…

ADVICE TO A NEWLY QUALIFIED LITIGATOR (2): BE LEGALLY STREETWISE : A LITIGATION CLIENT'S STRATEGY MAY POSSIBLY BE TO BLAME YOU

ADVICE TO A NEWLY QUALIFIED LITIGATOR (2): BE LEGALLY STREETWISE : A LITIGATION CLIENT’S STRATEGY MAY POSSIBLY BE TO BLAME YOU

July 15, 2019 · by gexall · in Avoiding negligence claims, Members Content, Useful links, Well being

In the second in this series I am reminding everyone of a very useful post from Darlingtons solicitors . I said at the time it was first written that it deserved wider publication, and they kindly agreed I could reproduce it. …

← Previous 1 … 13 14 15 … 20 Next →

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email. Subscription notifies you of a new post, it does not give you access to members' content.

Join 16.8K other subscribers

Recent Posts

  • AVOIDING THE PITFALLS: DRAFTING SCHEDULES OF DAMAGES: WEBINAR 16th APRIL 2026: WITH SOME INTERESTING QUOTES TO WHET YOUR APPETITE..
  • WASTED COSTS ORDER MADE AGAINST SOLICITORS WHEN THEY WERE MISTAKEN AS TO WHO THEY WERE INSTRUCTED BY: THE DEFENDANT ESTABLISHES CAUSATION
  • COST BITES 375 : WHY THESE INTERIM BILLS WERE NOT STATUTORY BILLS: “VERY CLEAR EVIDENCE WOULD BE NEEDED TO ESTABLISH THAT AN INVOICE WHICH, ON ITS FACE, IS EXPRESSLY NOT FINAL HAS NONETHELESS BEEN AGREED TO BE FINAL”
  • MAZUR IN THE COURT OF APPEAL: WEBINAR WITH CHECKLISTS: NOW AVAILABLE “ON DEMAND”
  • THROWBACK FRIDAY (1): ADJOURNMENTS ON THE GROUNDS OF ILL HEALTH: A DETAILED CONSIDERATION (APRIL 2015)

Top Posts

  • JOINDER OF NEW PARTIES IN EXISTING PROCEEDINGS 2: THE PRINCIPLES (AND THE COSTS!)
  • SETTING ASIDE DEFAULT JUDGMENT: THE RELEVANCE OF DELAY AND THE DENTON PRINCIPLES CONSIDERED IN THE HIGH COURT
  • WASTED COSTS ORDER MADE AGAINST SOLICITORS WHEN THEY WERE MISTAKEN AS TO WHO THEY WERE INSTRUCTED BY: THE DEFENDANT ESTABLISHES CAUSATION
  • MAZUR(ISH) MATTERS 59: UNQUALIFIED PERSON NOT ALLOWED TO REPRESENT PARKING COMPANY AT A SMALL CLAIMS HEARING
  • THE JUDGE FOUND AGAINST ME BECAUSE THEY GAVE TOO MUCH LEEWAY TO A LITIGANT IN PERSON : ALLEGATIONS OF THIS KIND SHOULD BE PARTICULARISED (AND CAREFULLY THOUGHT OUT)

Archives

Blogroll

  • Fatal Accident Law
  • Legal Futures
  • Personal injury: Liability and Damages

Books

  • Munkman & Exall on Damages for Personal Injuries and Death 15th ed
  • The APIL Guide to Fatal Accidents 4th edition

Useful Links

  • Buntools (for preparing PDF Bundles)
  • Kings Chambers
  • Kings Chambers Costs & Litigation Funding
  • Kings Chambers Serious Injury
  • The Civil Procedure Rules
  • The Law Society Gazette
  • The National Archives Recently Published Judgments
  • The Senior Court Costs Office Guide 2025
  • www.Bailii.org

Copyright

© Gordon Exall, Exall Legal Training, Civil Litigation Brief, 2013-2026. Unauthorised use and or duplication of the material contained on this blog without permission is strictly prohibited.
Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.

To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
  • Membership Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Advertising Policy
  • Copyright
  • Legal Disclaimer

Copyright © 2026 Civil Litigation Brief

Powered by Big Yellow Workshop

 

Loading Comments...
 

You must be logged in to post a comment.