WHEN THE JOINTLY INSTRUCTED EXPERT REPORT IS OF “LITTLE OR NO” ASSISTANCE TO THE COURT: A CASE IN POINT
The courts encourages the use of jointly instructed experts However this does not mean that the case, or even key issues in the case, are necessarily determined by those experts. Here we have a case where the judge held that…
“NO ONE CAN EXPECT SOLICITORS TO PAY FOR VEHICLE INSPECTION REPORTS PRODUCED BY SOMEONE OPERATING UNDER A PSEUDONYMN”: SOME INTERESTING ISSUES HERE
This is a case of many layers. It relates to an initial application to restrain the presentation of a winding up petition. The respondent asserted that they did not have no notice of the application and sought to set the…
SUBSCRIBER NEWS: SOME COMMON QUESTIONS CONSIDERED: UPGRADING MEMBERSHIP, USING MEMBERSHIP ON DIFFERENT DEVICES, CHANGING MEMBERS AND MEANS OF SUBSCRIPTION
It is eight days since CLB became a subscription site. I’m glad to say that the numbers visiting the site have not gone down and the membership system is working well. There are a number of common questions I am…
WHICH EXPERT WITNESS IS GOING TO BE PREFERRED? ONE EXPERT TOOK AN “UNREALISTIC APPROACH”
Knowing the reasons why a judge may prefer the evidence of one expert over another is an important part of a litigator’s skill. Each case is, of course, fact specific, but there are clear trends that can be discerned. Here…
WHAT ARE THE CONSEQUENCES WHEN A WITNESS BREAKS THE “PURDAH” RULES? THE ISSUES CONSIDERED IN THE HIGH COURT
The “purdah” rule – that a witness cannot discuss the case and their evidence with others, including their legal team, once they have started giving evidence is of utmost significance. Here we are looking at a case where a witness…
WASTED COSTS ORDER MADE AGAINST SOLICITORS WHO HAD PURSUED A “HOPELESS” CASE: ATTEMPTS TO RELY ON PRIVILEGE WERE A RESORT TO A MERE “FIG LEAF”
It is rare for a wasted costs order to be made against a solicitor for pursuing what is seen as a “hopeless” case. However we have such an order in the case we are considering here. The Master found the…
THE RULES OF COURT DO NOT ALLOW A PARTY TO COMPEL ITS OPPONENT TO EXPLAIN HOW ERRORS WERE MADE IN WITNESS STATEMENTS:
Can the court compel a party to file a witness statement explaining, in detail, why mistakes were made in earlier witness statements? That was the issue considered in the case we are looking at today. The judge considered the provisions…
ARE SOLICITORS WORKING ON A CONDITIONAL FEE AGREEMENT IN THE SAME BASIC POSITION AS CAR HIRE COMPANIES? THE COURT OF APPEAL CONSIDER THE POSITION
We may well be mining the Court of Appeal decision on the liability of car hire companies for costs across a number of further posts. Here, however, we are taking a look at the sections in the judgment that considered…
A COURT ORDER SO AMBIGUOUS THAT IT WAS IMPOSSIBLE TO ENFORCE : SOME ESSENTIAL POINTS ABOUT DRAFTING HERE
Here we are looking at a Court of Appeal decision about the drafting and construction of court orders. The order made in this case was totally deficient, consequently it could not be enforced. (Absolute precision is demanded here…) “……
AN IMPORTANT POINT ABOUT TRIAL BUNDLES: REDACTION SHOULD NOT NORMALLY TAKE PLACE: IT MAKES THE COURT’S JOB MORE DIFFICULT
There is always room for another case about bundles on this site. It is a subject of endless fascination to most litigators, and endless frustration for many judges. Here we are looking at a case where the trial judge observed…
PROVING THINGS 264: CLAIMANTS FAIL TO PROVE THAT THEY ARE ENTITLED TO AN INJUNCTION: “THE EVIDENCE PRESENTED BY THE CLAIMANTS DOES NOT COME CLOSE TO DEMONSTRATING A COMPELLING JUSTIFICATION FOR THE ORDER”
We are looking at a case where there was clear example of a failure to prove things. The claimants did not have sufficient evidence to satisfy the court it should make the order they were seeking. In fact the judgment…
THE CORRECT PROCEDURE IF A PARTY WANTS TO ATTEMPT TO RELY ON “WITHOUT PREJUDICE” DOCUMENTS: THE EXCEPTIONS TO THE WP RULE CONSIDERED
We are looking at a judgment from today which considers the “without prejudice” rule in some detail. In particular the steps a party should take if it wishes to argue that it should be able to rely on without prejudice…
SHOULD THIS CASE HAVE BEEN STARTED IN THE LOW VALUE PERSONAL INJURY PROTOCOL? DID IT FALL OUTSIDE IT? THESE ISSUES CONSIDERED
The question of whether a case should have been started using the Low Value Protocol is often a difficult one. The lawyer for the claimant has to make a decision on this important issue without the benefit of any medical…
PROVING THINGS 263: “IT IS A FUNDAMENTAL PRINCIPLE OF LITIGATION THAT A CLAIMANT MUST PROVE THEIR LOSS… THEY MUST ALSO SATISFY THE COURT AS TO THE AMOUNT OF ANY LOSS WHICH THEY HAVE SUFFERED”
This series has now covered hundreds of examples where litigants have failed to prove their case. We are looking at another example here where a counterclaiming defendant adduced no substantive evidence of a claim said to be worth nearly £500,000. …
SOME QUICK NOTES ABOUT CORPORATE SUBSCRIPTIONS: NEW GROUP NUMBERS ADDED – YOU CAN NOW SUBSCRIBE FOR UP TO 1,000 SEATS (AND MORE BY ARRANGEMENT)
A number of people have been in touch asking whether the site can accommodate larger groups than those set out in the original plan (someone has asked whether there can be “limitless” numbers on a subscription). As a result of…
A QUICK NOTE ABOUT CORPORATE MEMBERSHIP: HOW TO ADD COLLEAGUES (AND WHAT TO DO IF YOU WANT MORE THAN 50 MEMBERS)
This is the first day of this site as a subscription site and people have been very supportive. There have been very few teething problems. It will help if I address two issues: (i) how to add colleagues if you…
“ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE” ON TRIAL: WHEN QUESTIONED CHAT GPT WILL TELL YOU ITS MADE THINGS UP: THIS IS “A HALLUCINATION RATHER THAN A REAL LEGAL AUTHORITY”
Artificial Intelligence and legal “research” has been very much in the news of late. I am grateful to my colleague Steven Turner for sending me an example where, upon being questioned, Chat GPT readily conceded that a case it had…
SHOULD A PARTY BE ABLE TO INSTRUCT THEIR OWN EXPERT WHEN THEY DISAGREE WITH THE REPORT OF A JOINTLY INSTRUCTED EXPERT? THE ISSUES CONSIDERED
Here we are looking at a case where a party, dissatisfied with the approach of a jointly instructed expert, applied to the court for permission to instruct their own expert. The judgment contains a useful summary of the relevant principles….
THE CURRENT IMPORTANCE OF PLEADINGS 16: THE CASE AGAINST ALL REMAINING DEFENDANTS WAS STRUCK OUT: THE CLAIMANT CANNOT SIMPLY PLEAD “SOMEONE HERE” MUST BE TO BLAME
We are looking at a case where the court struck out the claimant’s case against three defendants because of the inadequate way in which the case was pleaded. General assertions that someone here must be to blame were not sufficient. The…
BECOME A MEMBER TO KEEP UP TO DATE: THIS SITE IS BECOMING A MEMBERSHIP SUBSCRIBER SITE – MAKING CLB BIGGER AND BETTER
On the 10th June 2025* this site is becoming a membership site. All the past posts, and the vast majority of future posts will only be available to members who have joined. This post explains what readers need to do…
CITING FALSE CASES TO THE COURT 3: THE PROBLEMS, THE GUIDANCE AND THE PENALTIES: PERVERTING THE COURSE OF JUSTICE HAS A MAXIMUM SENTENCE OF LIFE IMPRISONMENT…
We are returning to (and not for the last time) to the Divisional Court judgment in relation to the citation of false authorities due to the use of Artificial Intelligence. The Court reviews the dangers, the guidance and the sanctions…
CITING “FALSE” CASES TO THE COURT 1: JUDGMENT ON THE CONTEMPT OF COURT HEARINGS 1: THE CASE OF AYINDE
This blog has already considered the case of Frederick Ayinde, R (on the application of) v The London Borough of Haringey [2025] EWHC 1040 (Admin) on several occasions. False (presumably AI generated) authorities were put before the court. That case,…
PROVING THINGS 262: CLAIMANTS DID NOT HAVE THE EVIDENCE AT TRIAL TO PROVE THE DAMAGES SOUGHT: AN EXHAUSTING JOB
This series may well be misnamed. A more apt description may well be “not proving things”. That is what we are considering in looking at the case today. There was a lengthy trial with a substantial claim for damages. The…
THE CURRENT IMPORTANCE OF PLEADINGS 15: THE CLAIMANT HAD NOT PLEADED AN ISSUE SHE WANTED TO RELY ON AT TRIAL: THE ISSUE WAS “NOT PURSUED”
This series is giving rise to more cases than I initially thought. Here we look at an example of a claimant wishing to pursue a specific line of argument but having to accept that it was not pleaded and that…
PARTS OF WITNESS STATEMENT STRUCK OUT – THIS “CARRIES NO WEIGHT AS EVIDENCE”:DOORS FIRMLY SHUT IN RELATION TO INADMISSIBLE COMMENTARY
If we had a pound for every word in witness statements served in just one single month that was irrelevant or inadmissible we could probably go a long way to paying off the national debt. The costs, however, are probably…
PART 35 QUESTIONS TO EXPERTS A POINT ABOUT THE CASE LAW: HOW FAR CAN THE QUESTIONS GO? A CLOSE LOOK AT THE COURT OF APPEAL DECISION IN MUTCH
The previous post about when experts should be called to give evidence also contained a consideration of the nature of questions that can be put to experts. One of my colleagues has suggested that the summary relating to the questioning…
WHEN SHOULD PARTIES BE ALLOWED TO CALL EXPERT WITNESSES TO GIVE EVIDENCE AT TRIAL? THE ISSUES CONSIDERED (IN THE FAMILY COURT)
When should the courts permit experts to give evidence at trial? There are few cases on this topic and today we are looking at a decision in the family courts. The case is relevant to civil practitioners in that it…
WITNESS STATEMENTS, FORGED DOCUMENTS AND A FINDING OF CONTEMPT OF COURT: A WHOLE BUNCH OF PROBLEMS
This is a case where the judge found that the claimant and a witness relied on documents that they knew to be forged. It is an important reminder of the lengths that some people can go to in litigation. It…
THE CURRENT IMPORTANCE OF PLEADINGS 14: THE DEFENDANT COULD GIVE EVIDENCE OF MATTERS THAT WERE NOT PLEADED
Today we are looking at a case where the judge rejected an argument that evidence could not be given because the particular issue had not been pleaded. The judge held that, on the facts of this case, the evidence was…
DOES EVERY DOG DESERVE ONE BITE? LIABILITY FOR ANIMALS – RECENT CASES CONSIDERED: WEBINAR 6th JUNE 2025
It is difficult to find anyone who has a good word to say about Section 2 of the Animals Act, this webinar looks at recent cases relating to liability for animals and the practical steps litigators can take when considering…
PERIODICAL PAYMENTS AND PROVISIONAL DAMAGES 2025: WEBINAR 4th JUNE 2025
This webinar looks at recent cases in relation to periodical payments and periodical payments, including an interesting negligence case brought against solicitors who failed to claim provisional damages. Booking details are available here. It then looks at the…
THE JUDGE WAS WRONG TO GRANT THE DEFENDANT SUMMARY JUDGMENT IN A PERSONAL INJURY CASE: THIS SHOULD NOT BE A “MINI TRIAL”
Today we are looking at a case where the claimants were successful on appeal in overturning an order granting the defendant summary judgment. The case shows the limits of applications for summary judgment, in particular arguments that evidence was not…
PERSONAL INJURY POINTS 5: THE PUBLICAN WAS NOT VICARIOUSLY LIABLE FOR THE ACTS OF A SEPARATE SECURITY COMPANY
When a claimant is injured by doormen working on licensed premises is the publican vicariously liable if the assailants were employed by a separate security company ? The answer is “it depends”. The issue is primarily one of control. It…
EXPERTS IN COURT: “TRESPASSING ON THE JUDICIAL FUNCTION” AND “SEEKING TO ADVOCATE” ON BEHALF OF PARTY: THIS RARELY ENDS WELL…
There is no shortage of posts on this blogs where judges are critical of expert witnesses. Today we look at another such case where the judge found the expert’s approach “concerning” and went on to state that the expert was…
PROVING THINGS 261: PROVING FUTURE INTENTIONS: AN INTENTION TO HAVE MEDICAL OPERATIONS CARRIED OUT PRIVATELY
Today we are looking at a case where the defendant appealed against a decision that the claimant could recover the future cost of medical treatment to be carried out on a private basis. Statute states that there is no duty…
THE IMPORTANCE OF CONTEMPORANEOUS ATTENDANCE NOTES EXAMINED IN THE COURT OF APPEAL (BUT A DIFFERENT DIVISION TO THE ONE WE USUALLY LOOK AT)
Today we are taking a rare trip into the criminal courts, the Court of Appeal Criminal Division. However we are looking at an issue that affects most, if not all, lawyers. A client can attempt to blame their lawyer for…
AVOIDING UNDERSETTLEMENT: PROTECTING THE CLIENT AND PROTECTING YOURSELF: WEBINAR 29th MAY 2025
“We go back through your claim in fine detail and if we find that your previous solicitor wasn’t thorough enough and your claim was mishandled, we’ll squeeze out all the compensation that you’re entitled to, getting you more money, and…
PERSONAL INJURY POINTS 4: THE EMPLOYER WAS IN BREACH OF DUTY WHEN EMPLOYEE WAS INJURED CROSSING THE ROAD
Last week we looked at a case where someone was injured in their workplace, but there was no breach. Today we are looking a case where an employee was injured crossing the road and it was held that the employer…
THE CURRENT IMPORTANCE OF PLEADINGS 10: THE DUTIES ON A PARTY PLEADING ALLEGATIONS OF FRAUD OR DECEIT
Allegations of fraud have to be pleaded with care. Those pleading such assertions must have “reasonably credible material” to support them. Here we look at a case where allegations of deceit were made. The judge found that the allegations had…
PARTS OF A SOLICITORS’ WITNESS STATEMENT ARE STRUCK OUT: A REMINDER – A WITNESS STATEMENT IS A PLACE FOR FACTS, NOT OPINION, LEGAL ARGUMENTS OR ATTEMPTS TO GIVE EXPERT EVIDENCE: IT IS REALLY THAT SIMPLE
There are countless posts on this blog where judges have criticised the contents of witness statements. Here we are looking at a case where the judge struck out parts of a witness statement signed by a solicitor. Parts of the…
ANOTHER (YES ANOTHER) CASE OF FAKE AUTHORITIES BEING CITED TO THE COURT: APPEAL STRUCK OUT AS AN ABUSE OF PROCESS
Unbelievably we are looking at another case where the court found that false authorities had been cited to it. The appeal was struck out as an abuse of process. “In my judgment, the Court needs to take decisive action…
WHAT TO DO IF THE DEFENDANT MAKES AN EARLY PART 36 OFFER: WEBINAR 21st MAY 2025
A defendant is entitled to make a Part 36 offer whenever it wants. The making of an early offer can cause major problems for claimants and their lawyers. An understanding of the rules, the relevant cases and the steps that…
CIVIL PROCEDURE BACK TO BASICS 101: HOW NOT TO WRITE A LEGAL LETTER : DIMISSING CRUCIAL POINTS AS “COSMETIC” ERRORS LEADS TO REFERRAL TO THE SRA
There has not been a post in this series for some time. There was one case last week that made me decide to restart the series. It is not difficult to guess which case caused me concern. …
WITNESS STATEMENTS AND FINDINGS OF DISHONESTY BY AN EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNAL: EDMUND BURKE CITED “YOUR REPRESENTATIVE OWES YOU, NOT HIS INDUSTRY ONLY, BUT HIS JUDGEMENT: AND HE BETRAYS YOU INSTEAD OF SERVING YOU IF HE SACRIFIES IT TO YOUR OPINION”
It is rare for this blog to look at Employment Tribunal decisions. However examining the drafting of witness statements is part of its everyday fare. Here we look at a decision where the Tribunal was certain that witness statements had…
EXPERT EVIDENCE AND THE RISKS OF “ANCHORING”: THE EXPERT “GAVE THE SENSE OF TRYING TO ARGUE THE CLAIMANT’S CASE”
Today we are looking at a case where the judge had considerable reservations about expert evidence called on behalf of a claimant. Not all the problems that occurred were the fault of the expert. However she was the third expert…
WITNESS STATEMENTS: WHEN THE JUDGE REFERS TO MONKEYS WRITING SHAKESPEARE AND THE CHANCES OF SIMILARITIES BEING AKIN TO THE HEAT DEATH OF THE UNIVERSE – YOU ARE PROBABLY IN TROUBLE
There are countless posts about witness statements on this blog. Most of them reflect judicial commentary that is far from favourable in relation to the way that the statements have been drafted. We see considerable criticism in this case where…
WHEN CASES RELIED UPON IN WRITTEN ARGUMENTS WERE SIMPLY “FALSE”: WASTED COSTS ORDER MADE AGAINST COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS
This blog celebrates its 12th anniversary next month. Civil Litigation Brief started as a column in the Solicitors Journal 35 years ago. Over that time many people have helpfully sent me and pointed me me to cases of interest. In…
THE ROLE OF LEADING COUNSEL IN RELATION TO EXPERT REPORTS AND WITNESS STATEMENTS: A CLIENT CAN PAY FOR WHAT THEY WANT, BUT THESE COSTS WILL NOT BE RECOVERABLE INTER PARTES
How far should leading counsel, or counsel generally, be involved in the preparation of expert reports and witness statements? One obvious reply is “not at all”, given that the evidence should come from the expert or witness. These issues were…
CHIEF CORONER’S GUIDANCE FOR CORONERS ON THE BENCH: A USEFUL SOURCE OF INFORMATION FOR ALL THOSE INVOLVED IN INQUESTS
Today has been a day for sending out useful links. Here we have a useful link for all those who are involved in inquests. A link to the Chief Coroner’s Guidance for Coroners on the Bench which was revised earlier…
NEW EDITION OF THE KINGS BENCH GUIDE: THE GENERAL CHANGES AND THE GUIDANCE ON ANONYMITY ORDERS
There is a new edition of the King’s Bench Guide. There are some additions and changes. In particular the Guide notes the difference between an application for an anonymity order made at an approval hearing and one that is not….
You must be logged in to post a comment.