MORE ON SUMMARY ASSESSMENT OF COSTS & PROPORTIONALITY: NOT GOING FOR A SONG
The issue of proportionate costs was considered by Judge Behrens in Taylor -v- Bell & Haworth (16th February 2015). It provides a useful example of judicial comments in relation to disproportional costs. THE CASE The applicant was seeking a variation of…
SUMMARY ASSESSMENT OF COSTS: ANOTHER EXAMPLE: SAY IT WITH FLOWERS
We have looked, several times, at judgments which contain summary assessment of costs. Not least to get a flavour of the approach of the courts. An assessment took place by Mr Justice Birss in Interflora -v- Marks & Spencer…
LITIGANTS IN PERSON INCREASE USE OF RESOURCES NOT SAVE THEM: COURT OF APPEAL DECISION
In Linder -v- Rawlins [2015] EWCA Civ 61 the Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal of a litigant in person appealing in relation to certain aspects of disclosure in a divorce petition. What is particularly telling is that part of…
WHAT THE JACKSON REPORT SAID ABOUT COURT FEES: TOO HIGH AND SHOULD BE USED TO IMPROVE CIVIL JUSTICE SYSTEM
The government, and the Ministry of Justice in particular, has been keen to advocate and implement the Jackson reports. The costs of litigation should be proportional and, in effect, this means reduced. However in all the discussions in relation to…
JOINDER OF A PARTY FOR COSTS, INDEMNITY COSTS & COMMENTS ON COSTS OUTSIDE THE COSTS BUDGET: EXCELERATE TECHNOLOGY ROUND 2
We looked earlier at the observations on costs in giving judgment in Excelerate Technology Ltd -v- Cumberbatch [2015] EWHC B1 Mercantile. A supplementary judgment on the costs issues is now available. It contains the rationale for the matters discussed in the…
WHEN WILL INDEMNITY COSTS BE ORDERED? A HIGH COURT DECISION CONSIDERED
Indemnity costs now carry extra weight in that, on assessment, the court is not bound by the principle of proportionality. In Siegel -v- Pummell [2015] EWHC 195 (QB) Mr Justice Wilkie reviewed the relevant principles in relation to indemnity costs….
EARLY CONTENDERS FOR WORST PUNS ON CIVIL CASES 2015: YOU JUDGE THE STANDARD
In the annual review of civil litigation of 2014 there was an easy winner for the case that gave rise to the most, and worst, puns. There is an early contender for this award in 2015. Since this competition is…
GUIDANCE GIVEN AS COSTS BUDGETING IN PRACTICE: CONTINGENCIES, RATES AND TIMING: YEO -v- TIMES NEWSPAPERS LIMITED
The judgment of Mr Justice Warby in Tim Yeo MP -v- Times Newspapers Limited [2015] EWHC 209 (QB) contains some interesting observations in relation to pleading allegations of fraud. However here we look at the judge’s observations in relation to…
THE RIHANNA CASE AND COSTS: A QUICK CODA
The main judgment in the Rihanna case was considered in an earlier post which considered the problems caused by witnesses giving opinion evidence. There is a short supplementary judgment Fenty -v- Arcadia Group Brands Ltd [2015] EWCA Civ 38 which…
COSTS AGAINST NON-PARTIES: NOTHING LOST IN TRANSLATION: THE CAPITA CASE CONSIDERED
The decision today of Sir James Munby In the Matter of Capita Translation and Interpreting Limited [2015] EWFC 5 reiterates the principles of costs against third parties. The judgment contains a detailed review of the law relating to cost liability…
CHILDREN CASES AND THE RECOVERY OF A SUCCESS FEE: CHANGES COMING INTO FORCE ON APRIL 6th
Amidst all the changes to Part 36 it is easy to miss the fact that changes in relation to children cases on the 6th April 2015. In essence this provides a mechanism for the court to consider the deduction of…
THE MITCHELL CASE AND COSTS: IN THE NEWS AGAIN
My apologies for relying on a non-legal source. However the BBC reports that Mr Mitchell has been ordered to pay both sets of costs in the defamation action. THE CASE BBC News reports a decision of Mr Justice Mitting that…
PRELIMINARY APPLICATIONS: DEPARTING FROM COST BUDGETS AND FAILURE TO SERVE COST SCHEDULES: A HIGH COURT DECISION
In Simpson -v- MGN Limited [2015] EWHC 126 (QB) Mr Justice Warby considered several contentions in relation to costs budgeting; non-service of costs schedules and proportionality. This is, again, a case that serves as an object lesson as to the…
CFA NOT FRUSTRATED BY CAPACITY: BLANKLEY APPEAL DRAWS A BLANK FOR DEFENDANT
In Blankley -v- Central Manchester and Manchester Children’s University Hospitals NHS Trust [2015] EWCA Civ 18, where judgment was given today, the Court of Appeal upheld the first instance decision that a claimant’s subsequent incapacity does not invalidate a claimant’s…
APPEALING COSTS BUDGETS: THE RELEVANT CRITERIA CONSIDERED AND APPLIED
The decision of H H Judge Freedman in Havenga -v- Gateshead NHS Foundation Trust [2014] EWHC B25(QB) demonstrates how difficult it is for a party to appeal a costs budget. THE CASE The claimant was bringing a claim for hemiplegic…
THE DANGERS OF A PART 36 OFFER: CLAIMANT PAYS THREE TIMES MORE IN COSTS THAN HE RECEIVED IN DAMAGES
The dangers of a claimant rejecting a Part 36 offer are clearly demonstrated in the case of UWUG Ltd & Haiss -v- Ball [2015] EWHC 74 (IPEC). The claimant received damages of £2,859.20 but was ordered to pay the defendant…
COSTS AT THE END OF THE CASE: THE JUDGE CAN MAKE OBSERVATIONS ABOUT MATTERS OUTSIDE THE COSTS BUDGET
The judgment of H.H. Judge Simon Brown Q.C in Excelerate Technology Ltd -v- Cumberbatch [2015] EWHC B1 Mercantile contains some interesting observations at the end. This illustrates the need for trial counsel to be aware of both the costs budget…
LET THE COURT KNOW HOW MUCH AN EXPERT IS GOING TO COST: A MANDATORY REQUIREMENT
The short judgment of Mr Justice Warby in Sloutsker -v- Romanova [2015] EWHC 81(QB) contains some important observations about preparing for hearings. It also serves as a timely reminder that a party asking for permission to instruct an expert must…
GET BUNDLES AND SKELETON ARGUMENTS TO COURT – OR ELSE: CHIEF CONSTABLE COPS IT
There is a brief report on Lawtel today of the case of Marsh -v- Ministry of Justice (QB Phillips J 20/01/2015)*. It provides an object lesson on the need for all parties (and non-parties) to lodge – or re-lodge -…
SUBSTANTIAL COSTS INCURRED IN ARGUING ABOUT COSTS: NIGHTMARE IN BELGRAVIA?
In Chliafichtein -v-Wainbridge Estates Belgravia Ltd [2015] EWHC 47 (TCC) Mr Justice Coulson made some comments in relation to the escalation of costs in preparing for an argument about who should pay the costs. THE CASE The claimant obtained an…
PROPOSALS FOR INCREASED COURT FEES: MONITORING THE PROPOSALS AND THE DEBATES
There is a section on this blog which provides regularly updated links to posts and articles on civil procedure. However the issue of the major proposed increase in court fees is such a major issue I am giving this its…
COSTS REDUCED FROM £201,000 TO £96,465 ON SUMMARY ASSESSMENT: A WORKING EXAMPLE OF PROPORTIONALITY IN PRACTICE
It is always useful to look at the way in which courts are carrying out summary assessments. Another interesting example of the pragmatic approach adopted can be found in the judgment of Mr Justice Akenhead in Savoye -v- Spicers Ltd…
£3,500 DAMAGES: A 10 DAY TRIAL: 3 DAYS IN THE COURT OF APPEAL: £500,000 IN COSTS: BLEAK HOUSE IN THE COURT OF APPEAL
In Gilks -v- Hodgson [2015] EWCA Civ 5 the Court of Appeal had strong words to say about the costs of a boundary dispute. The observations should be read by anyone tempted to litigate about these issues. THE CASE The…
RECEIVERS, EXTENSIONS OF TIME AND RIGOROUS COSTS BUDGETING TO ENSURE PROPORTIONALITY
The Denton principles were considered by Mr Registrar Jones in Justice Capital Ltd -v- Murphy [2014] All ER (D) 187 (Dec). There were important issues in relation to proportionality and costs. Of particular interest is the rigorous case management and…
ENTERPRISE, PROPORTIONALITY, WITNESS STATEMENTS AND UNNECESSARY COSTS: OBSERVATIONS FROM THE HIGH COURT
In Enterprise Holdings, Inc -v- Europcar Group UK Ltd [2015] EWHC 17 (Ch) Mr Justice Arnold made some telling remarks which bear on proportionality, witness evidence and costs. THE CASE The dispute related to the use of a “e” logo…
THE LORD CHIEF JUSTICE'S REPORT 2014: CIVIL JUSTICE
The Lord Chief Justice’s Report for 2014 is available online. It covers many aspects of the judicial system. Here we look at the report in relation to civil justice, THE REPORT On civil justice the Report identifies 5 key areas:…
THE NEW PART 36: PART 10: PULLING IT ALL TOGETHER: 18 KEY POINTS
This post provides a summary of the changes to Part 36 and then considers the practical implications of the new rules, including the implications for on-going litigation. There are links to the relevant posts on the issue and a summary…
THE NEW PART 36: PART 9: HOW IT REFLECTS AND CHANGES THE EXISTING CASE LAW
This is the 9th in the series on the new Part 36. Here we deal with the relevant case law which may be changed by the new rules. THE EXPLANATORY TEXT Rule changes are usually accompanied by helpful explanatory notes….
PROPORTIONALITY & SURVIVAL FOR LITIGATORS: PART 2: A WHOLE NEW APPROACH?
It is no accident that there is nearly a month between the first post in this series and the second. Nor is it surprising that very little (if anything) has been written on “proportional” litigation. This is a difficult subject….
THE NEW PART 36: PART 8: STRUCTURE OF THE NEW RULE AND A RECAP OF POSTS TO DATE
Here we look at the structure of the new Part 36. The section part of this post recaps and provides links to the earlier posts on the new Part 36. Future posts will deal with the impact of the new…
THE NEW PART 36: PART 6: PERSONAL INJURY CASES
This is the sixth in the series of posts dealing with the new rules governing Part 36 coming into force in April 2015. This post deals with a new section of Part 36 on personal injury cases. This appears to…
THE NEW PART 36: PART 5: WAS THE OFFER A "GENUINE ATTEMPT" TO SETTLE PROCEEDINGS?
One addition to the rule is a further factor for the court to take into account when considering whether or not the usual costs, and other consequences, of Part 36 should apply. THE NEW CPR 36.17: COSTS CONSEQUENCES FOLLOWING JUDGMENT…
THE NEW PART 36: PART 4: WHERE A COSTS BUDGET IS LIMITED TO COURT FEES
This is the fourth in the series of posts on the new Part 36 coming into force on the 6th April 2015. The rules contain a brand new provision that deals with the position where a offeror’s costs are limited…
THE NEW PART 36: PART 3: UNACCEPTED OFFERS AND INCREASED RESTRICTIONS ON DISCLOSURE OF OFFERS
This is the third in the series of posts that deals with the Part 36 provisions coming into force on the 6th April 2015. Here we look at the rules restricting disclosure of a Part 36 offer and some important…
THE NEW PART 36 PART 2: OTHER EFFECTS OF ACCEPTING A PART 36 OFFER
This is the second part of a series dealing with the new provisions of Part 36 which comes into force on the 6th April 2015. The first in the series can be found here. Here we look at the new…
ADMISSION UNDER THE PROTOCOL AND PORTAL MAY NOT BE BINDING IN SUBSEQUENT PROCEEDINGS
Is an admission made by an insurer under the Portal binding on the parties in a future action? In September last year we looked at the case of Ullah -v- Jon where a district judge held that an admission was…
E-DISCLOSURE & BREACH OF ORDERS: CASE STRUCK OUT: NO QUESTION: AND NO QUARTER GIVEN
In Smailes -v-McNally [2014] EWCA Civ 1296 the Court of Appeal made it clear that breach of a peremptory order in relation to disclosure will lead to grave consequences for the defaulting litigant. THE CASE This case was looked at…
THE NEW PART 36: COMING TO YOUR PRACTICES SOON: PART 1
The “new” Part 36 comes into force on the 6th April 2015. Here I provide the first part a summary of the main chances. To prevent any confusion this post only cites the new rules. THERE IS NOW AN EXPRESS…
THE DENTON PRINCIPLES AND SEEKING TO AVOID PAYING MONEY DUE UNDER COURT ORDERS
The application of the Denton principles was considered by Mr Justice Peter Smith in Mulugeta Guadie Mangiste -v- Endownment Fund for the Rehabilitation of Tigray [2014] EWHC 4196 (Ch) when reviewing an argument that the claimant should not pay an order for…
SUMMARY ASSESSMENT OF COSTS: AN IMPORTANT EXAMPLE
This blog has looked at examples of the summary assessment of costs before. These do not give rise to any great principles or points of law. Summary assessments are rarely (if ever) reported. Virtually every litigator is going to be…
CLAIMANT BEATS OWN PART 36 OFFER AND RECEIVES AN ADDITIONAL £75,000 IN DAMAGES
The advantages to a claimant in making a prompt, and realistic, Part 36 offer are shown in the judgment of Sir David Eady in Downing -v- Peterborough & Stamford Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2014] EWHC 4216 (QB). THE KEY POINT…
COSTS OF £7 MILLION: PART 36 BITES HARD ON CLAIMANTS WHO CLEARED A FIRST HURDLE BUT FELL AT THE SECOND
If anyone ever needed a lesson on the risks of litigation they should read the judgment of Mr Justice Eder in Ted Baker plc -v- Axa Insurances UK Plc [2014] EWHC 4178 (Comm). THE CASE There had been a preliminary…
SOLICITOR'S NEGLIGENCE & SOLICITOR'S COSTS: ELEMENTARY ISSUES WORTH READING
The transcript of Edwin Coe LLP -v- Aidiniantz [2014] EWHC 3994 (QB) is worth reading for a number of reasons: (i) The nature of the duty owed by the solicitor in litigation; (ii)evidence and contemporary documents and (iii) the circumstances…
PROPORTIONALITY & SURVIVAL FOR LITIGATORS: LITIGATING WITHIN A BUDGET: PART 1 OF WHAT MAY WELL BE A MULTI PART SERIES
There is now plenty of material on costs budgeting, much of it can be found in links on this blog. However I have not found any guidance for litigators on how the requirement for “proportional” costs will affect their work…
COSTS, PROPORTIONALITY AND GETTING THE BUNDLES RIGHT: TAKE EVERYTHING OUT OF COURT NOW AND COME BACK TOMORROW
An earlier post reported on the observations of Mostyn J in J-v-J in relation to costs, proportionality and bundles. If you take the indignation and sense of outrage expressed in J-v-J about costs, preparation and bundles, and then quadruple it,…
COSTS INCURRED PRE-BUDGET ARE HIGHLY RELEVANT: FUTURE COSTS COULD BE DRASTICALLY REDUCED
In Redfern -v- Corby Borough Council (QBD 03/12/2014)* Judge Seymour QC upheld the decision of a deputy master that the amount of costs already incurred had a major impact upon the future costs budget. THE CLAIM The claimant was brining…
MAKING AN "APPORTIONED" COSTS ORDER: A CLAIMANT WHO RECOVERS LESS THAN THEY ARE ASKING IS NOT A "LOSER"
It is more common for a judge to “apportion” costs at the end of a trial to reflect the merits of the case and the “success” of each party. In Trant -v- Stokes (o3/12/2014 CA)* the Court of Appeal overturned…
IF YOU SETTLE WITH SOME OF THE PARTIES THE OTHERS CAN STILL COME AFTER YOU FOR COSTS: THE LESSONS OF DUFOO
In Dufoo -v- Tolaini and Ors [2014] EWCA Civ 1536 the Court of Appeal considered the issue of costs liability between the claimants where two claimants had settled their action with a defendant but a third went on to trial…
IF YOU CAN'T PROVE YOU HAVE A PROPER RETAINER YOU WON'T GET PAID: SHIPPING IN FROM HULL
In Scott -v- Hull & East Yorkshire Hospitals NHS Trust [2014] Ew Misc B53(CC) the claimant failed to recover any costs against the defendant because he failed to prove that there was a valid CFA. THE FACTS A detailed assessment was…
COSTS BUDGETING AND MORE CASE MANAGEMENT IN THE COURT OF PROTECTION? EXPECT IT SOON
It is only recently that the Court of Appeal has “opened its doors” so to speak on reports of its cases. The judgment of Peter Jackson J in A & B (Court of Protection: Delay & Costs) [2014] EWCOP 8…
