THE BRIAN MAY COSTS CASE: TRANSCRIPT NOW AVAILABLE: PROPORTIONALITY APPEAL DID NOT BITE THE DUST
Thanks to the good offices of the ACL the judgment on appeal of May -v- Wavell Group Ltd is now available here. The claimant’s appeal on the issue of proportionality was allowed. The figure of £35,000 plus vat for costs…
PUTTING THE “COSTS OF BUDGETING” IN THE BUDGET: A DEBATE
Yesterday I wrote about the issues posed by the fact that the costs of budgeting (the 1% and 2% allowed for Form H and budgeting) now cannot be assessed at the budget stage. I suggested the budgeting order should read…
THE COSTS OF COSTS BUDGETING CANNOT BE ASSESSED UNTIL THE END OF THE CASE – A QUICK REMINDER: THE PRACTICAL CONSEQUENCES
The early part of the year may be a good time to remind people that it is now not possible to put the 1% and 2% figures in the costs budget at the end of the budgeting process. CHANGE IN…
REVISING COSTS BUDGETS: “SIGNIFICANT DEVELOPMENTS”, INCURRED COSTS AND APPLICATIONS MADE DURING THE COURSE OF A TRIAL
In Sharp v Blank & Ors [2017] EWHC 3390 (Ch) Chief Master Marsh considered an application by the defendant to revise its costs budget. The judgment contains important observations about the practicalities involved in costs budgeting. There is also a detailed…
TWO ISSUES RELATING TO COSTS: STAGE 3 ISSUE FEES; COSTS BUDGETING IN FATAL CASES WHERE THERE IS A CHILD DEPENDENT
I had an interesting email this morning from Jon Heath, solicitor at Levins, Liverpool. It deals with two distinct issue: Stage 3 issue fees. Costs budgeting in a fatal case where there is a child involved. STAGE 3 ISSUE FEES….
CIVIL LITIGATION REVIEW OF 2017 (IV): COSTS, BUDGETS, PROCEDURAL GAMES AND MISCONDUCT ON ASSESSMENT
This year has been a surprisingly muted year for costs cases, particularly in the higher courts. Several judgments were expected, however they rarely proved to be definitive or wide ranging. 2018 may be the year that some issues are resolved….
CHANGES TO THE RULES IN RELATION TO THE COSTS OF COSTS MANAGEMENT: COMPARE AND CONTRAST
There has been a change to the rules governing the costs of costs management. This was introduced by the 93rd Update on Practice Direction Amendments. The Ministry of Justice have confirmed that these have come into force. * THE NEW RULE:…
CLINICAL NEGLIGENCE: RECOVERABILITY OF PREMIUMS & PROPORTIONALITY: COURT OF APPEAL DECISION TODAY
In Peterborough & Stamford Hospitals NHS Trust v McMenemy & Ors [2017] EWCA Civ 1941 the Court of Appeal considered the position in relation to the payment of insurance premiums in clinical negligence cases. The Court decided that it is appropriate…
RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS NOT NEEDED: A DECISION “POUR ENCOURAGER LES AUTRES”: A SOLICITOR CAN RELY ON A LETTER FROM THE COURT
In his judgment today in Freeborn & Anor v Marcal (t/a Dan Marcal Architects) [2017] EWHC 3046 (TCC) Mr Justice Coulson had some telling observations on whether a party needed relief from sanctions and whether relief should be granted. He held…
COSTS BUDGETING AND PROPORTIONALITY TEST APPLY – EVEN IN A CASE FOR £350 MILLION
in Sharp & Ors v Blank & Ors [2017] EWHC 141 (Ch) Mr Justice Nugee considered the issue of proportionality in a case where £350 million was at stake. Mr Justice Nugee decided that the requirement for costs budgeting, and proportionality,…
PRACTISING “DEFENSIVE LITIGATION” : ESSENTIAL CHECKLISTS GATHERED TOGETHER
What many (if not most) of the posts on this blog make clear is that there is now precious little room for error in civil procedure. To operate effectively, and profitably, we have to develop systems of “defensive litigation”. That…
COST BUDGET SERVED TWO MONTHS LATE: RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS ALLOWED: DELAY DOES NOT ALWAYS GIVE RISE TO A SIGNIFICANT BREACH
I am grateful to my colleague Colin Richmond for sending me a copy of the decision of His Honour Judge Gosnell In Hewitt -v- Smith (Bradford County Court 16th June 2017) relating to a successful appeal from a refusal to…
THE BANK OF IRELAND CASE ROUND TWO: APPROPRIATE SUMS FOR AN INTERIM PAYMENT ON ACCOUNT OF COSTS: INDEMNITY COSTS ORDERED BECAUSE OF CONDUCT OF EXPERT
In an earlier post we looked at the judgment in Bank of Ireland -v- Watts Group PLC [2017]EWHC 1667 (TCC) where Mr Justice Coulson was particularly excoriating about the claimant’s expert. Having lost the case the bank had to pay the…
PROPORTIONALITY – A LITIGATOR’S SURVIVAL GUIDE V – A ROUND UP: 12 KEY POINTS TO TAKE YOU INTO OCTOBER (AND BEYOND)
The issue of “proportionality” is central to contemporary litigation. However it is rarely examined in detail and rarely discussed. Attempts to analyse how proportionality can be achieved are even rarer. For the fifth in this (slow burning) series I review…
COST BUDGETING: THE CASES AND POSTS IN ONE PLACE
There is a specific section on relief from sanctions on this blog which links to all the posts and related cases on CPR 3.9. Here I am starting to do the same for costs budgeting. Here, however, I aim to…
BUDGETS, ASSUMPTIONS AND AGREEMENT: GUIDANCE FROM THE BENCH: PRECEDENT R WILL HELP YOU OUT IF YOU EVER WANT TO DEPART FROM THE BUDGET
I have already paid homage to the Solicitors Journal. The articles in the last edition show how much it contributed . Given the inability of the SJ to draw attention to itself I draw everyone’s attention to the article by…
IS THE BUDGET DEFINITIVE ON ASSESSMENT? CASE IDENTIFIED: TWO TRAINS OF THOUGHT CONTINUE
The position of the status of the budget and hourly rates is in flux. Michael Fletcher earlier posted an article reporting an assessment he took part in where District Judge Lumb (sitting as the Regional Costs Judge in Birmingham) expressly disagreed…
IS THE BUDGET DEFINITIVE ON ASSESSMENT? MORE CATS, MORE PIGEONS: THERE ARE NOW TWO TRAINS OF THOUGHT ON THE HOURLY RATE
Earlier this month I blogged on the decision in RNB v London Borough of Newham [2017] EWHC B15 (Costs). Deputy Master Campbell decided that the hourly rate could be challenged at the assessment stage even if the total of a particular…
ANOTHER LATE COSTS BUDGET: RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS GRANTED TO ERRANT DEFENDANTS WHO SERVED BUDGET 10 DAYS LATE
In Mott & Anor v Long & Anor [2017] EWHC 2130 (TCC) His Honour Judge Grant (sitting as a judge of the High Court) considered a relief from sanctions application in relation to defendants who had served a costs budget ten…
COSTS BUDGETING: IMPORTANCE GUIDANCE FROM MASTER MCCLOUD: HOW SHOULD THE COSTS OF BUDGETING BE DEALT WITH IN FORM H AND THE FINAL BILL?
Important guidance was given this morning by Master McCloud (sitting as Deputy Costs Judge) in Woodburn v Thomas (Costs budgeting) [2017] EWHC B16 (Costs).It relates to how the costs of budgeting should be dealt with in Precedent H and any in…
COSTS BUDGETS:HOURLY RATES IN THE BUDGET ARE NOT DETERMINATIVE OF THE HOURLY RATES ON ASSESSMENT: A CAT AMONG THE PIGEONS HERE
In RNB v London Borough of Newham [2017] EWHC B15 (Costs) Deputy Master Campbell made an important decision in relation to hourly rates on assessment. The rates set out in the cost budget are not determinative of the rates allowed on…
COSTS BUDGETING IN BIG CASES: COSTS BUDGETS DO NOT PREVENT REASONABLE AND PROPORTIONATE COSTS BEING RECOVERED
The short judgment of Mr Justice Birss in Napp Pharmaceutical Holdings Ltd v Dr Reddy’s Laboratories (UK) Ltd & Ors [2017] EWHC 1433 (Pat) has some important lessons for litigators. “I entirely reject the submission that cost budgeting creates a problem…
FIXED COSTS: USEFUL LINKS: THE REPORTS AND THE COMMENTARY
The Jackson Report on fixed costs has already led to a great deal of controversy. Here are links to some of the most useful posts and articles. These include links to the report itself, Guidance and the extensive commentary (including…
WHEN CIRCUMSTANCES CHANGE AFTER A BUDGET IS CONFINED TO COURT FEES: DECISION TO ALTER BUDGET UPHELD
In Asghar -v- Bhatti[ 2017] EWHC 1702 (QB) Mr Justice Lewis considered an issue in relation to varying a budget that was confined to court fees. The court considered “change of circumstances” – this is also a case that shows…
COSTS BUDGET ONE DAY LATE: RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS REFUSED: DON’T MAKE MOUNTAINS OUT OF MOLEHILLS BUT PUT THINGS RIGHT – QUICKLY
There are only two realistic options in relation to a relief from sanctions application: (i) do it properly and promptly; (ii) don’t do it all. The dangers of a hasty application are illustrated in the judgment in Lakhani -v- Mahmud…
INCURRED COSTS, PROPORTIONALITY AND BUDGETING MEANS A CASE SHOULD NOT BE STRUCK OUT
The previous post looked at the issue of incurred costs and budgeting. Some interesting points were raised in the very complex case of King Felix Sunday Bebor Berebon & others -v- The Shell Petroleum Development Company of Nigeria Limited [2017]…
INCURRED COSTS AND COSTS BUDGETING: TWO RECENT CASES
Two recent cases have considered the significance of incurred costs in costs budgeting. These two cases indicate: 1. Incurred costs do not form part of the budgeting process (but can be scrutinised at assessment, including on the issue of whether…
DON’T STOP ME NOW*: CLIFF’S COSTS BUDGETING: INCURRED COSTS; THE CAP ON THE COSTS OF BUDGETING AND PREPARATION FOR TRIAL
In Sir Cliff Richard OBE -v- The BBC & Chief Constable of South Yorkshire Police [2017] EWHC 1666(Ch) Chief Master Marsh declined an invitation to make any observations about incurred costs. The case: Has an interesting (and important) discussion of…
HARRISON -v- COVENTRY: THE COMMENTARY SO FAR: USEFUL LINKS
The Court of Appeal decision Harrison -v- University Hospitals Coventry & Warwickshire Hospital NHS Trust [2017] EWCA Civ 792 is a significant one. To help consider its practical significance here are links to the commentary on the case. (I…
COSTS BUDGETING AND THE FINAL BILL: HARRISON IN THE COURT OF APPEAL
How definitive is a costs budget when it comes to detailed assessment? That is an issue that has been troubling the courts now for a few years. The judgment of the Court of Appeal today in Harrison -v- University Hospitals…
TALES FROM THE APIL CONFERENCE I: TO AVOID “AGREEMENT” OF COSTS BUDGETS BY DEFAULT READ DIRECTIONS FOR THE CCMC WITH CONSIDERABLE CARE
I am doing a series of posts on matters arising from the APIL annual conference. I am not aiming to cover all the issues and matters raised. People can (and should) read the Presidents speech . Given the nature of…
COSTS, BUDGETS AND “STRATEGY”: THE CASES TO READ
Is it appropriate to talk about “strategy” in relation to costs budgeting? It probably says a lot that I am at the APIL annual conference and this is one of the things being talked about in the reception at the…
“WE WILL FIGHT THEM ON THE BUDGET”: COSTS BUDGETING: STOP PLAYING PROCEDURAL GAMES: COULSON J PROVIDES CLEAR GUIDANCE
Costs budgeting is not a place for the playing of procedural games. Mr Justice Coulson made this clear in his judgment published today in Findcharm Ltd -v- Churchill Group Ltd [2017] EWHC 1109 (TCC). It is a clear warning of…
MERRIX NOT BEING APPEALED (BUT HARRISON IS – WATCH THIS SPACE)
The decision in Merrix -v- Heart of England NHS Foundation Trust [2017] EWHC 346 (QB) is not being appealed by the defendant. The rationale is, apparently, that the defendant did not want to risk losing the listing of the appeal in Harrison…
FILING FORM H: WHEN DOES A CASE HAVE A VALUE OF “LESS THAN £50,000”? A POINT TO WATCH
There are now several formats for Form H. The “short” one page version is now used in cases where the value is between £25,000 and “less than £50,000”. Some judges are interpreting this strictly to read between £25,000 and £49,999″….
“AGREED” COSTS BUDGETS NOT APPROVED BY THE COURT : THAT QC IS JUST TOO EXPENSIVE – THINK AGAIN
In Brown -v- BCA Trading Limited [2016] EWHC 1464 (Ch) Mr Registrar Jones refused to approve “agreed” budgets. He held that the fees of leading counsel were too high and needed to be reconsidered. This shows that an agreement between…
COSTS, CONDUCT, PART 36, COSTS BUDGETING: THE SECOND JUDGMENT IN GIANT CAR LIMITED
The previous post looked at the judgment of Mr Stephen Furst QC in Car Giant Limited -v- the Mayor and Burgesses of the London Borough of Hammersmith [2017] EWHC 197 (TCC). Here we look at the subsequent judgment on costs at [2017]…
MERRIX ON APPEAL TO THE HIGH COURT JUDGE: COSTS BUDGETING IS AS DEFINITIVE FOR PAYING PARTY AS IT IS FOR RECEIVING PARTY: JUDGMENT TODAY
In the judgment today in Merrix -v- Heart of England NHS Foundation Trust [2017] EWHC 346 (QB) Mrs Justice Carr allowed an appeal about the significance of costs budgeting when it comes to assessment. “In my judgment, the answer to…
NEW RULES COMING INTO FORCE: COSTS BUDGETING AND QADER RESULT CODIFIED
The Civil Procedure (Amendment) Rules 2017 were made on the 3rd February. Most of these come into force on the 6th April 2017. The new rules are available here COSTS BUDGETING The amendments set out below may be perplexing. However…
COSTS AT THE END OF A CASE: INDEMNITY COSTS, PAYMENTS ON ACCOUNT AND GOING BEYOND THE COSTS BUDGET
In Barkhuysen -v- Hamilton [2016] EWHC 3371 (QB) Mr Justice Warby considered matters relating to costs after a trial. The defendant’s conduct led to an order for indemnity costs being made. The judge also identified those areas in which the claimant…
JUDGE USES COSTS BUDGET TO ASSESS COSTS AT THE END OF A TRIAL: THE RELEVANCE OF THE BUDGET & WHEN SHOULD THE COURT GO OUTSIDE IT?
In Sony Communications International AB -v- SSH Communications Security Corporation [2016] EWHC 2985 (Pat) Mr Roger Wyand QC (sitting as a Deputy High Court Judge) used the costs budget to carry out an assessment of the costs at the end…
PROPORTIONATE COST ORDERS WHEN COSTS ARE £8 MILLION AND £10 MILLION APIECE: HIGH COURT DECISION
We have already looked at the decision in Amey LG Limited -v- Cumbria County Council [2016] EWHC 2496 (TCC) in relation to the question of proportionality. However the judgment contains much more of interest in relation to costs. It provides an…
TALES FROM COSTS LAW CONFERENCE IV: PROPORTIONALITY – A LITIGATOR'S SURVIVAL GUIDE V
The issue of proportionality raised its head more than once at the recent ACL conference. However I addressed the issue directly (or perhaps obliquely). My central argument being that proportionality requires a fundamentally different approach to litigation. Further there is…
TALES FROM COSTS LAW CONFERENCE III: SATELLITE NAVIGATION, MERRIX AND COSTS BUDGETING
One issue discussed at the Association of Costs Lawyers in Manchester on the 24th October was the decision in Merrix -v- Heart of England NHS Foundation Trust [2016] EWHC B28 (QB). The question of whether a detailed assessment is needed…
ANOTHER EXAMPLE OF THE DIFFICULTY IN REVISING A BUDGET: AN ACUTE CHANGE OF CASE IS REQUIRED
I am grateful to Michael Davidson from Acumension who has sent me a copy of the judgment of District Judge Hovington in the case of Warner -v- The Pennine Acute Hospital NHS Trust (Manchester County Court 23rd September 2016) (available…
THE PARTIES CANNOT CONTRACT OUT OF COSTS BUDGETING (& A LITTLE BIT ABOUT WITHOUT PREJUDICE CORRESPONDENCE)
An earlier post dealt with the decision of Mr Justice Roth in Agents’ Mutual Limited -v- Gascoigne Halman [2016] CAT 21. However an earlier ruling in the same case contains a consideration of whether the parties can agree to sidestep budgeting….
COSTS MANAGEMENT AND PROPORTIONALITY IN ACTION
Issues of costs budgeting and proportionality were considered by Mr Justice Roth in Agents’ Mutual Limited -v- Gascoigne Halman [2016] CAT 21. It provides an interesting example of the judicial approach to proportionality and costs budgeting. “Proportionality is fundamental to…
COSTS BUDGETING: IT'S JUST A PHASE I'M GOING THROUGH
One advantage of going to conferences is that it usually gives rise to ideas for the blog. So speaking at the Association of Costs Lawyers conference yesterday has given rise to a whole host of issues which will be explored…
REASONABLENESS AND PROPORTIONALITY: A DIRECT IMPACT UPON LITIGATION DECISIONS
I have been writing for some time about the impact of “proportionality” upon the practice of litigation itself. One example of this can be found in the judgment of Master James in Briggs & 598 others -v- First Choice Holidays…
THIS COSTS BUDGETING THING – IT IS NOT THAT IMPORTANT: WELL THINK AGAIN
There are some important observations made by Mr Justice Roth in Agents’ Mutual Limited -v- Gascoigne Halman Limited [2016] EWHC 2315 (Ch) in relation to both costs budgeting and security for costs. KEY POINTS There is no duty on a…
You must be logged in to post a comment.