Civil Litigation Brief ®
Menu
  • Home
  • About
  • Membership Plans
  • Webinars
  • Login
Updates and Commentary on Civil Procedure, by Gordon Exall, Barrister, Kings Chambers
Browse: Home » Service of the claim form » Page 6
THE ADDRESS FOR SERVICE OF THE CLAIM FORM: HAVE YOU GOT A SYSTEM? LITIGATING OR WINGING IT?

THE ADDRESS FOR SERVICE OF THE CLAIM FORM: HAVE YOU GOT A SYSTEM? LITIGATING OR WINGING IT?

March 24, 2018 · by gexall · in Avoiding negligence claims, Case Management, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Service of the claim form, Serving documents

Do you know the address for service of all your cases? Are you sure? Looking at the decision in Woodward & Anor v Phoenix Healthcare Distribution Ltd [2018] EWHC 334 (Ch) brings out the point as to how insouciant litigators can be…

SERVICE OF A COMPANY UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT: MURPHY -V- STAPLES RE-VISITED

SERVICE OF A COMPANY UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT: MURPHY -V- STAPLES RE-VISITED

March 23, 2018 · by gexall · in Members Content, Service of the claim form, Serving documents

I am likely to be returning to the judgment of Master Bowles in Woodward & Anor v Phoenix Healthcare Distribution Ltd [2018] EWHC 334 (Ch) several times on this blog. If the decision is appealed and upheld it is likely to…

SERVICE OF THE CLAIM FORM: DEFENDANTS HAVE A DUTY UNDER THE CPR TO POINT OUT TECHNICAL ERRORS (OR WHY LIFE HAS SUDDENLY GOT A LOT HARDER FOR DEFENDANT LAWYERS)

SERVICE OF THE CLAIM FORM: DEFENDANTS HAVE A DUTY UNDER THE CPR TO POINT OUT TECHNICAL ERRORS (OR WHY LIFE HAS SUDDENLY GOT A LOT HARDER FOR DEFENDANT LAWYERS)

March 21, 2018 · by gexall · in Abuse of Process, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Service of the claim form, Serving documents

NB THIS DECISION WAS OVERTURNED ON APPEAL – SEE THE POST HERE I wrote earlier this week about the “tantalising” judgment of Master Bowles in the case of  Woodward & Anor v Phoenix Healthcare Distribution Ltd [2018] EWHC 334 (Ch). At…

SERVICE OF THE CLAIM FORM AFTER BARTON: IS THERE A  DUTY ON A DEFENDANT'S SOLICITOR TO POINT OUT A MISTAKE?

SERVICE OF THE CLAIM FORM AFTER BARTON: IS THERE A DUTY ON A DEFENDANT’S SOLICITOR TO POINT OUT A MISTAKE?

March 20, 2018 · by gexall · in Appeals, Applications, Members Content, Service of the claim form, Serving documents

It was unlikely that the decision in Barton v Wright Hassall LLP [2018] UKSC 12 would put an end to all issues relating to service of the claim form.  There is a tantalising judgment* of Master Bowles in Woodward & Anor v Phoenix Healthcare…

THE LIMITATION PERIOD IS JUST ABOUT TO EXPIRE AND YOU ARE NOT READY:  FIVE KEY POINTS FOR WHEN YOU DICE WITH PROCEDURAL DEATH

THE LIMITATION PERIOD IS JUST ABOUT TO EXPIRE AND YOU ARE NOT READY: FIVE KEY POINTS FOR WHEN YOU DICE WITH PROCEDURAL DEATH

March 18, 2018 · by gexall · in Avoiding negligence claims, Members Content, Service of the claim form, Serving documents

No matter how hard litigators try (and how many warnings are given) it appears inevitable that, sooner or later, you are going to have a case where the limitation period is about to expire but you are not ready.  The…

EXTENSIONS OF TIME FOR SERVICE WERE PROPERLY GRANTED: APPLICATIONS TO SET ASIDE ARE A REHEARING NOT A REVIEW: HIGH COURT DECISION

EXTENSIONS OF TIME FOR SERVICE WERE PROPERLY GRANTED: APPLICATIONS TO SET ASIDE ARE A REHEARING NOT A REVIEW: HIGH COURT DECISION

February 27, 2018 · by gexall · in Appeals, Extensions of time, Members Content, Service of the claim form

Another week, another case about service of the claim form. This time the claimant was more successful. In DDM v Al-Zahra (PVT) Hospital & Ors [2018] EWHC 346 (QB). Mr Justice Foskett allowed an appeal against a Master’s decision setting aside…

AVOIDING PROBLEMS WITH SERVICE OF THE CLAIM FORM: WEBINAR 14th MARCH 2018

AVOIDING PROBLEMS WITH SERVICE OF THE CLAIM FORM: WEBINAR 14th MARCH 2018

February 22, 2018 · by gexall · in Members Content, Service of the claim form, Serving documents, Useful links

The judgment yesterday in Barton -v- Wright Hassall LLP [2018] UKSC 12  shows how crucial correct service of the claim form can be.  There are dozens of examples on this blog  of  cases where service with the claim form goes wrong. In an…

12 POINTS RELATING TO SERVICE OF THE CLAIM FORM: THINGS THAT YOU REALLY, REALLY, NEED TO KNOW

12 POINTS RELATING TO SERVICE OF THE CLAIM FORM: THINGS THAT YOU REALLY, REALLY, NEED TO KNOW

February 21, 2018 · by gexall · in Appeals, Applications, Avoiding negligence claims, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Service of the claim form, Serving documents

Today is all about service of the claim form. Following on from the Supreme Court decision in Barton -v- Wright Hassall LLP [2018] UKSC 12  this morning this is a good time to update your knowledge about basic points of procedure. TWELVE…

BARTON -V- WRIGHT HASSALL: JUDGMENT IN THE SUPREME COURT TODAY: A DETAILED BREAKDOWN OF THE MAJORITY JUDGMENT

BARTON -V- WRIGHT HASSALL: JUDGMENT IN THE SUPREME COURT TODAY: A DETAILED BREAKDOWN OF THE MAJORITY JUDGMENT

February 21, 2018 · by gexall · in Appeals, Members Content, Service of the claim form, Serving documents

It is rare for issues relating to procedure to reach the Supreme Court. The judgment today in Barton -v- Wright Hassall LLP [2018] UKSC 12 concerned the issue of correct service of the claim form.  The claimant lost the appeal (albeit…

CLAIM FORMS IN THE SUPREME COURT: SERVICE BY EMAIL NOT GOOD SERVICE: NO SPECIAL RULES FOR A LITIGANT IN PERSON

CLAIM FORMS IN THE SUPREME COURT: SERVICE BY EMAIL NOT GOOD SERVICE: NO SPECIAL RULES FOR A LITIGANT IN PERSON

February 21, 2018 · by gexall · in Appeals, Members Content, Service of the claim form

The Supreme Court dismissed the claimant’s appeal in Barton -v- Wright Hassall [2018] UKSC 12.  Service by email on a solicitor who had not confirmed they would accept service was not good service. A claimant would not be granted any…

FIRST CLAIM FORM CASE OF THE YEAR: THE DANGERS OF LEAVING SERVICE UNTIL THE LAST MINUTE

FIRST CLAIM FORM CASE OF THE YEAR: THE DANGERS OF LEAVING SERVICE UNTIL THE LAST MINUTE

January 17, 2018 · by gexall · in Civil Procedure, Members Content, Relief from sanctions, Service of the claim form, Serving documents

It is the middle of January (bluebells nowhere in sight) and we have already have a claim form case to consider.  In  Kennedy v The National Trust for Scotland [2017] EWHC 3368 (QB) Sir David Eady considered whether service (at the…

MYTHS ABOUT PROCEDURE: THE DATE FOR SERVICE IS  NOT CALCULATED FROM THE DAY THE COURT RECEIVES THE CLAIM FORM: IT IS CALCULATED FROM THE DATE OF "ISSUE"

MYTHS ABOUT PROCEDURE: THE DATE FOR SERVICE IS NOT CALCULATED FROM THE DAY THE COURT RECEIVES THE CLAIM FORM: IT IS CALCULATED FROM THE DATE OF “ISSUE”

October 26, 2017 · by gexall · in Avoiding negligence claims, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Service of the claim form

 In an earlier post on limitation myths I recounted how I often received phone calls from worried solicitors who feared they had missed a limitation period. The papers had been received by the court within the period, the date of…

SERVICE ON SOLICITORS: A REMARKABLE VIEW LEADS TO MAJOR MISTAKE:  THE LAW SUMMARISED

SERVICE ON SOLICITORS: A REMARKABLE VIEW LEADS TO MAJOR MISTAKE: THE LAW SUMMARISED

September 20, 2017 · by gexall · in Avoiding negligence claims, Members Content, Service of the claim form, Serving documents

I have already written today about the decision in Higgins & Ors v ERC Accountants & Business Advisers Ltd [2017] EWHC 2190 (Ch). I want to isolate one element of that case that relates to the remarkable view that the claimants’ solicitor…

ANOTHER MONTH, ANOTHER DECISION ON NON-SERVICE OF THE CLAIM FORM: THE RESULT OF A "NEGLIGENT OR INCOMPETENT ERROR"

ANOTHER MONTH, ANOTHER DECISION ON NON-SERVICE OF THE CLAIM FORM: THE RESULT OF A “NEGLIGENT OR INCOMPETENT ERROR”

September 20, 2017 · by gexall · in Applications, Members Content, Service of the claim form, Serving documents

In Higgins & Ors v ERC Accountants & Business Advisers Ltd [2017] EWHC 2190 (Ch) His Honour Judge Pelling  (sitting as a High Court judge) considered a number of issues relating to service of the claim form. It is another example…

ANOTHER CLAIM FORM CASE: PUTTING IN THE POST ON REQUISITE DATE IS GOOD SERVICE: NO SAFE HARBOUR FOR DEFENDANTS ON THIS ISSUE

ANOTHER CLAIM FORM CASE: PUTTING IN THE POST ON REQUISITE DATE IS GOOD SERVICE: NO SAFE HARBOUR FOR DEFENDANTS ON THIS ISSUE

September 12, 2017 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Service of the claim form

Master McCloud has already made observations about the ” dry and unlovely crop of procedural service issues” that are regularly coming before the Masters.  Another issue was considered in  Jones v Chichester Harbour Conservancy & Ors [2017] EWHC 2270. “… the correct…

SERVICE OF PROCEEDINGS WITHOUT PERMISSION: THE COURT HAS POWER TO RECTIFY THE POSITION RETROSPECTIVELY

SERVICE OF PROCEEDINGS WITHOUT PERMISSION: THE COURT HAS POWER TO RECTIFY THE POSITION RETROSPECTIVELY

September 6, 2017 · by gexall · in Applications, Extensions of time, Members Content, Service of the claim form, Serving documents

Can the court rectify the situation when a claimant, who requires permission to continue proceedings, has issued and served without such permission? That was the question considered by His Honour Judge Davis-White QC in Wilton UK Ltd v Shuttleworth & Ors…

ANOTHER SERVICE CASE: AVOIDING THE PROCESS SERVER CAN LEAD TO AN ORDER THAT ALTERNATIVE METHOD IS GOOD SERVICE

ANOTHER SERVICE CASE: AVOIDING THE PROCESS SERVER CAN LEAD TO AN ORDER THAT ALTERNATIVE METHOD IS GOOD SERVICE

August 16, 2017 · by gexall · in Members Content, Service of the claim form, Serving documents

I resolved not to write about service of the claim form cases for a while. However the cases keep coming through. CPR 6.15(2) allows the court to order that steps already taken to bring the claim form to attention of…

SERVICE ON A NOMINATED SOLICITOR: BE CLEAR WHO YOU REPRESENT: "A THOROUGHLY TECHNICAL POINT", UNATTRACTIVE, MISCONCEIVED AND "REFLECTS NO CREDIT ON THE INSURERS OR THEIR ADVISERS"

SERVICE ON A NOMINATED SOLICITOR: BE CLEAR WHO YOU REPRESENT: “A THOROUGHLY TECHNICAL POINT”, UNATTRACTIVE, MISCONCEIVED AND “REFLECTS NO CREDIT ON THE INSURERS OR THEIR ADVISERS”

August 15, 2017 · by gexall · in Appeals, Members Content, Service of the claim form, Serving documents

Earlier this week Master McCloud commented upon “a dry and unlovely crop of procedural service issues” in the Masters’ Corridor.   These issues may well follow the Masters around.  Master Davison sits as a Recorder. In that capacity he decided an…

STOPPING PROBLEMS WITH  SERVICE OF THE CLAIM FORM SPRINGING UP: 10 KEY POINTS

STOPPING PROBLEMS WITH SERVICE OF THE CLAIM FORM SPRINGING UP: 10 KEY POINTS

August 12, 2017 · by gexall · in Avoiding negligence claims, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Service of the claim form, Serving documents

In Caretech Community Services Ltd v Oakden & Ors [2017] EWHC 1944 (QB) Master McCloud described how the Masters’ Corridor is plagued by “a dry and unlovely crop of procedural service issues. Despite efforts by numerous courts at all levels to prevent their…

BLUEBELLS, THE MASTERS' CORRIDOR AND  THE CLAIM FORM:  "A DRY AND UNLOVELY CROP OF PROCEDURAL SERVICE ISSUES"

BLUEBELLS, THE MASTERS’ CORRIDOR AND THE CLAIM FORM: “A DRY AND UNLOVELY CROP OF PROCEDURAL SERVICE ISSUES”

August 12, 2017 · by gexall · in Extensions of time, Members Content, Service of the claim form, Serving documents

There are numerous cases about service of the claim form on this blog. They are clearly a major issue in the Masters’ Corridor. Witness the opening words of Master McCloud’s judgment in Caretech Community Services Ltd v Oakden & Ors [2017]…

THE SERVICE OF PROCEEDINGS WAS PHOTOGRAPHED AND FILMED : AND THIS TURNED OUT TO BE IMPORTANT

THE SERVICE OF PROCEEDINGS WAS PHOTOGRAPHED AND FILMED : AND THIS TURNED OUT TO BE IMPORTANT

July 30, 2017 · by gexall · in Applications, Members Content, Service of the claim form, Serving documents

In Yukos Finance BV & Ors v Lynch & Ors [2017] EWHC 1812 (Comm) the claimants were so concerned about the defendant’s attempt to evade service that they arranged for the process to be photographed and filmed. As it turns out…

MICROSOFT, SERVICE AND FULL AND FRANK DISCLOSURE: HIGH COURT JUDGE SAYS "NO"

MICROSOFT, SERVICE AND FULL AND FRANK DISCLOSURE: HIGH COURT JUDGE SAYS “NO”

February 28, 2017 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Service of the claim form

One feature of this blog  for this year has been the duty owed by litigants making without notice applications.  Another example of the problems caused can be seen in the judgment on Mr Justice Marcus Smith in Microsoft Mobile OY…

THE DUTY OF FULL DISCLOSURE ON WITHOUT NOTICE APPLICATIONS: ANOTHER EXAMPLE OF PROBLEMS OCCURRING

February 3, 2017 · by gexall · in Applications, Extensions of time, Members Content, Service of the claim form

The New Year’s resolution for litigators that I recommended this year came (apparently) as a surprise to many: “Think very carefully before, during and after, making an ex parte application of any kind.”  The judgment of Mrs Justice Andrews DBE…

FIRST CLAIM FORM CASE OF THE YEAR: AND THERE'S A BRIGHTSIDE

January 10, 2017 · by gexall · in Case Management, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Service of the claim form, Serving documents, Uncategorized

Every year brings a batch of cases relating to service of the claim form. This year starts with an unusual issue. In Brightside Group Ltd -v- RSM UK Audit LLP [2017] EWHC 6 (Comm) Mr Justice Andrew Baker considered  issues…

DISPUTING SERVICE: USING THE RIGHT PROCEDURE: THE APPLICATION OF CPR 3.10

December 7, 2016 · by gexall · in Members Content, Service of the claim form, Serving documents, Setting aside judgment, Uncategorized

In Bank of Boroda, GCC Operations -v- Nawayny Marine Shipping FZE [2016] EWHC 3089 (Comm) Ms Sara Cockerill QC (sitting as a Deputy Judge of the High Court) considered issues in relation to disputing service. What is interesting  here is…

ANOTHER CLAIM FORM CASE: WHY IT CAN BE DANGEROUS FOR A DEFENDANT TO TAKE TECHNICAL POINTS

July 15, 2016 · by gexall · in Civil Procedure, Members Content, Service of the claim form, Serving documents, Uncategorized

The decision of Master Mathews in DB UK Bank Limited -v- Sinclair Solicitors [2015] EWHC B29 (Ch) has today been reported on Bailli.  It is a case that shows the dangers of taking technical points as to service. “if I…

EXTENSION OF THE CLAIM FORM: A RARE SUCCESS FOR A CLAIMANT (BUT IT HAS GOT A LOT TO DO WITH CONDUCT)

June 15, 2016 · by gexall · in Appeals, Applications, Conduct, Members Content, Service of the claim form, Serving documents, Uncategorized

Most cases relating to extensions of time for service for the claim form end badly for the claimant. The decision of Mr Justice Roth in The Khan Partnership LLP -v- Infinity Distribution Limited [2016] EWHC 1390 (Ch) is an exception….

EXTENDING TIME FOR SERVICE OF A CLAIM FORM: PROSECCO MAY HELP

May 12, 2016 · by gexall · in Appeals, Extensions of time, Insolvency, Members Content, Service of the claim form, Uncategorized

There have been numerous cases relating to extension of the claim form on this blog. I can’t remember one which ended well for the claimant.  However the claimant was successful in the Instone -v- Prosecco (Leeds) LImited [2016] EW Misc…

EXTENSION OF TIME FOR SERVICE OF THE CLAIM FORM SET ASIDE: A CASE ALL CLAIMANTS SHOULD KNOW

May 6, 2016 · by gexall · in Appeals, Members Content, Service of the claim form, Serving documents, Uncategorized

A really easy way for a claimant lawyer to get sued is to hold onto the claim form. Cases relating to late or mis-service of the claim form are a regular feature of this blog.  It is equally dangerous for…

TAKING TECHNICAL POINTS AS TO SERVICE: JUDICIAL "DISMAY" THAT THE MATTER WAS PURSUED

April 25, 2016 · by gexall · in Members Content, Relief from sanctions, Service of the claim form, Serving documents, Uncategorized

One of the most difficult decisions that litigators now face is whether to take “technical points”. Technical points, particularly as to service of the claim form, can potentially bring proceedings to a premature end. However there are risks as well…

MORE ABOUT SERVICE OF THE CLAIM FORM: GOOD REASONS, DELAY AND A FAILURE TO PAY THE PROPER COURT FEES

April 15, 2016 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil evidence, Limitation, Members Content, Service of the claim form, Uncategorized

In TMT Asia LImited -v- BHP Billiton Marketing AG [2016] EWHC 287 (Ch) Mr Justice Burton considered several issues relating to late service of the claim form and failure to pay the correct court fee. KEY POINTS The defendant’s application…

WHAT A DAY FOR CLAIM FORM CASES: DECISION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL

March 23, 2016 · by gexall · in Appeals, Applications, Members Content, Service of the claim form, Serving documents, Uncategorized

No sooner was the (metaphorical) ink dry on the post on the Abbott -v- Econwall case   when the Court of Appeal decision in Barton -v- Wright Hassall [2016] EWCA Civ 177. In the case the judge allowed an application…

A FURTHER GENTLE REMINDER OF YOUR NEW YEAR'S RESOLUTION 2: BE CAREFUL ABOUT THE ADDRESS FOR SERVICE

February 4, 2016 · by gexall · in Applications, Avoiding negligence claims, Members Content, Service of the claim form, Serving documents, Uncategorized

Now that the gyms are emptying out again this is a good time to provide one of the periodical reminders about the civil litigator’s new year’s resolutions.  Just concentrating upon the address for service. RESOLUTION 2 KNOW THE ADDRESS AND…

SERVICE OF PROCEEDINGS WHEN THEY ARE PUT IN THE BIN: A HIGH COURT DECISION

February 1, 2016 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil evidence, Members Content, Service of the claim form, Serving documents, Uncategorized

In Morby -v- Gate Gourmet Luxembourg IV SARL [2016] EWHC  74 (Ch) Edward Murray (sitting as a Deputy Judge of the Chancery Division) considered an issue relating to personal service. “If facts are in dispute, absent special situations, it would…

EXTENDING TIME FOR SERVICE OF THE CLAIM FORM: A RISKY BUSINESS

January 28, 2016 · by gexall · in Applications, Avoiding negligence claims, Case Management, Civil Procedure, Extensions of time, Members Content, Service of the claim form, Uncategorized

In Medhi Kohsravi -v- British American Tobacco PLC [2016] EWHC 123 (QB)Sir David Eady stated that he would have set aside an order extending time for service of the claim form. It is a timely warning that obtaining an extension…

SERVICE BY EMAIL IS GOOD SERVICE: FAMILY COURT DECISION

January 14, 2016 · by gexall · in Applications, Electronic service,, Members Content, Service of the claim form, Serving documents, Uncategorized

Issues of electronic service are still relatively novel.  Some interesting issues were addressed by Mostyn J in Maughan -v- Wilmot [2015] EWHC 29 (Fam).  This is a family case where important observations are made in relation to service by email…

LATE SERVICE OF THE CLAIM FORM, EXTENSIONS OF TIME AND RESTORATION TO THE REGISTER: IT DOESN'T END WELL

January 12, 2016 · by gexall · in Appeals, Applications, Members Content, Service of the claim form, Uncategorized

The decision in Hyfield Estates Ltd -v- Eggar [2015] EWHC 3773 (QB) (His Honour Judge Peter Hughes QC sitting as a Judge of the High Court) provides another example of the dangers of late service of the claim form “It…

TEN NEW YEAR'S RESOLUTIONS FOR LITIGATORS IN 2016

December 31, 2015 · by gexall · in Applications, Assessment of Costs, Avoiding negligence claims, Bundles, Case Management, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Costs, Costs budgeting, Credibility of experts, Damages, Disclosure, Expert evidence, Members Content, Professional negligence,, Proportionality, Relief from sanctions, Risks of litigation, Service of the claim form, Statements of Case, Uncategorized, Witness statements

Some resolutions to keep you prosperous and out of difficulties in 2016. (Happy New Year) 1. NEVER, EVER, GUESS ABOUT A LIMITATION PERIOD (OR TAKE A CLIENT’S WORD FOR IT) Litigators of all types must have a clear idea about…

SENDING THE FEE WITH THE APPLICATION: FAILURE CAN BE FATAL

December 1, 2015 · by gexall · in Appeals, Applications, Members Content, Service of the claim form, Serving documents, Uncategorized

I am grateful to barrister Matthew White for sending me details and a copy of the decision of His Honour Judge Lopez in Price -v- Egbert H Taylor Limited (Birmingham County Court 2nd October 2015). “… there [are] numerous authorities…

WHEN TWO RULES COLLIDE:PART 36 OFFER DOES NOT OVERRIDE NEED TO SERVE THE CLAIM FORM

November 27, 2015 · by gexall · in Members Content, Part 36, Relief from sanctions, Service of the claim form, Uncategorized

In The Former Owners of the Motor Vessel “Melissa K” -v- The Former Owners of the Motor Tanker “Tomsk” [2015] EWHC 3445 (Admlty) Mr Justice Males considered the interplay between Part 36 and the need to serve. It is an…

WHEN IS PERSONAL SERVICE EFFECTED? A CASE TO SEND TO ALL YOUR PROCESS SERVERS

November 2, 2015 · by gexall · in Members Content, Service of the claim form, Serving documents, Uncategorized

In Tseitline -v- Mikhelson [2015] EWHC 3065 (Comm) Mr Justice Phillips had to consider whether effective personal service had taken place. THE CASE The claimants had attempted to serve the defendant outside, and then later inside, the National Gallery.  The…

CPR 3.10 STOPS A CLAIM FROM SINKING: USING THE WRONG FORM NOT FATAL TO AN ACTION

October 29, 2015 · by gexall · in Civil Procedure, Members Content, Service of the claim form, Uncategorized

In LD Commodities Rice Merchandising LLC -v- The Owners and/or Charterers of the Vessel Styliani Z [2015 ] EWHC 3060 (Admlty) Mr Justice Teare considered a case where the claimant used the wrong form to issue an action, this could…

ANOTHER CLAIM FORM NOT SERVED PROPERLY: SERVICE ABROAD AND SERVICE ON A SOLICITOR

October 23, 2015 · by gexall · in Members Content, Service of the claim form, Serving documents, Uncategorized

In Transportes Viana E Fernandes LDA -v- Baban & others (Brighton County Court, 15th January 2015)*  His Honour Judge Simkiss overturned the order of the District Judge in circumstances where the claim form had not been served properly.  The claim…

SERVICE BY E-MAIL: ALLOWED BY THE HIGH COURT SO THAT INJUNCTION COULD BE EFFECTIVE

October 12, 2015 · by gexall · in Civil Procedure, Members Content, Service of the claim form, Serving documents, Uncategorized

In JPH -v- XYZ [2015] EWHC (a decision made this Saturday!) Mr Justice Popplewell made an order allowing service by e-mail. THE CASE The claimant was bringing an injunction to prevent “revenge porn”. An application was made without notice to…

WHEN LAW AND POLITICS COLLIDE : IT'S ALL ABOUT SERVICE

October 12, 2015 · by gexall · in Civil Procedure, Members Content, Service of the claim form, Uncategorized

It is rare for cases about service of the claim form to reach the headlines. This, however, is what happened in Ireland -v- Dorries [2015] EWHC 2781 (QB). Although service here relates to service of an Election Petition the court…

SERVED A COPY CLAIM FORM BY MISTAKE? THERE MAY BE A WAY OUT: BUT BE CAREFUL

October 9, 2015 · by gexall · in Civil Procedure, Members Content, Relief from sanctions, Service of the claim form, Uncategorized

In United Utilities Group PLC -v- Hart (HH Judge Wood, Liverpool County Court, 24th September 2015*) a claimant was granted a “reprieve” after having served a photocopy of the claim form by mistake.  However this is another one of those…

SERVICE OF THE CLAIM FORM; RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS AND CHALLENGING THE JURISDICTION: A COMPLEX MIX?

September 27, 2015 · by gexall · in Civil Procedure, Members Content, Relief from sanctions, Service of the claim form, Uncategorized

The decision of Judge Hacon in Cant -v- Hertz Corporation [2015] EWHC 2617 (Ch) raises some interesting issues.  However, equally interesting, are the issues that were not addressed. In particular the issues relating to the applicability of CPR Part 11…

"HOW TO GET SUED, MAKE A LOSS AND BE MISERABLE": 22nd SEPTEMBER 2015: HARDWICKE BUILDING, LONDON: RAISING FUNDS FOR THE BILLABLE HOUR

September 11, 2015 · by gexall · in Avoiding negligence claims, Case Management, Civil evidence, Costs, Costs budgeting, Members Content, Relief from sanctions, Risks of litigation, Service of the claim form, Striking out, Uncategorized, Witness statements

LITIGATORS: HOW TO GET SUED: MAKE A LOSS AND BE MISERABLE RAISING MONEY FOR THE BILLABLE HOUR APPEAL (ALL PROCEEDS GO TO THE APPEAL) Gordon Exall and PJ Kirby QC. Hardwicke Building, Lincoln’s Inn. TUESDAY 22nd SEPTEMBER 2015 5.30 -…

SERVICE OF THE CLAIM FORM – FURTHER PROBLEMS: YOU CANNOT ALWAYS RELY ON WHAT YOU ARE TOLD

July 21, 2015 · by gexall · in Civil Procedure, Members Content, Service of the claim form

Service of the claim form is an issue that continues to cause problems.  There is a brief report on Lawtel today of the decision of Stewart J in Dzekova -v- Thomas Eggar PPL (QBD 17/07/2015)*.  It is another example of…

ANOTHER MIS-SERVED CLAIM FORM: CLAIMANTS DO NOT PASS GO AND DO NOT GET TO THE BANK

June 3, 2015 · by gexall · in Civil Procedure, Members Content, Service of the claim form, Serving documents

There are a number of issues considered by Mr Justice Arnold in Chopra -v- Bank of Singapore [2015] EWHC 1549 (Ch).  However the claimants failed at the very first, and very familiar, hurdle – service of the claim form. THE…

← Previous 1 … 5 6 7 Next →

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email. Subscription notifies you of a new post, it does not give you access to members' content.

Join 12.3K other subscribers

Recent Posts

  • ATTEMPTING TO RE-WRITE A DRAFT JUDGMENT: THIS HARDLY EVER (IF EVER) PERSUADES A JUDGE THAT THEY WERE WRONG
  • ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN COURT: AN INTERESTING PRACTICE DIRECTION FROM THE HIGH COURT IN IRELAND : GOOD ADVICE FOR US ALL
  • COST BITES 424: A CLAIM FOR 30.5 HOURS IN ONE DAY: A SCHEDULE “SO UNRELIABLE IT CANNOT FORM THE BASIS FOR ASSESSMENT”
  • THE NEW LAW ON LIMITATION AND SEXUAL ABUSE CLAIMS CONSIDERED IN THE HIGH COURT: THE NEW SECTION 11ZA ONLY EXTENDS TO THE SEXUAL ABUSE ASPECTS OF A CLAIM
  • THROWBACK FRIDAY: GESTMIN GUIDANCE IN THE CONTEXT OF CLINICAL NEGLIGENCE CASES (WITH A CHANCE TO REMEMBER HH ALAN GORE K.C.) : JULY 2019

Top Posts

COST BITES 419: HOW CLAIMING COUNSEL'S FEES ON AN N260 CAN LEAD TO REFERRAL TO THE ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR CONTEMPT OF COURT PROCEEDINGS TO BE CONSIDERED: SIGNATORY BEWARE
COST BITES 423: THE JUDGE'S EYEBROWS ARE RAISED AT AN ADDITIONAL £2,500 BECAUSE THE KC HAS TO STAY FOR THE AFTERNOON...
COST BITES 421 : THE AMY WINEHOUSE CASE IS BACK IN COURT: CLAIMANT'S AGGRESSIVE CONDUCT OF A CASE WHERE HE LOST "ON EVERY MATERIAL POINT OF FACT AND LAW" LEADS TO AN ORDER FOR INDEMNITY COSTS TO PAY COSTS ON THE INDEMNITY BASIS
MAZUR MATTERS 66: THE LEGAL SERVICES BOARD FINAL REPORT ON MAZUR: "REGULATORY REVIEW OF ADVICE AND GUIDANCE PROVIDED TO THE PROFESSION ON THE CONDUCT OF LITIGAITON BY APPROVED REGULATORS AND REGULATORY BODIES"
AN APPLICATION TO STRIKE OUT FOR ABUSE OR PROCESS ADJOURNED - TO SEE WHETHER THIS NEED HAPPEN ON A "ROLLING BASIS": ONE THOUSAND CLAIMANTS STARTED BUT ARE UNLIKELY TO FINISH...

Archives

Blogroll

  • Fatal Accident Law
  • Legal Futures
  • Personal injury: Liability and Damages

Books

  • Munkman & Exall on Damages for Personal Injuries and Death 15th ed
  • The APIL Guide to Fatal Accidents 4th edition

Useful Links

  • Buntools (for preparing PDF Bundles)
  • Kings Chambers
  • Kings Chambers Costs & Litigation Funding
  • Kings Chambers Serious Injury
  • The Civil Procedure Rules
  • The Law Society Gazette
  • The National Archives Recently Published Judgments
  • The Senior Court Costs Office Guide 2025
  • www.Bailii.org

Copyright

© Gordon Exall, Exall Legal Training, Civil Litigation Brief, 2013-2026. Unauthorised use and or duplication of the material contained on this blog without permission is strictly prohibited.
Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.

To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
  • Membership Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Advertising Policy
  • Copyright
  • Legal Disclaimer

Copyright © 2026 Civil Litigation Brief ®

Powered by Big Yellow Workshop

Loading Comments...

You must be logged in to post a comment.