Civil Litigation Brief ®
Menu
  • Home
  • About
  • Membership Plans
  • Webinars
  • Login
Updates and Commentary on Civil Procedure, by Gordon Exall, Barrister, Kings Chambers
Browse: Home » Appeals » Page 5
NEW COURT OF APPEAL (CIVIL DIVISION) GUIDE 2025: A USEFUL LINK TO AN ESSENTIAL GUIDE

NEW COURT OF APPEAL (CIVIL DIVISION) GUIDE 2025: A USEFUL LINK TO AN ESSENTIAL GUIDE

June 10, 2025 · by gexall · in Appeals, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Useful links

A new Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Guide has been published.  It provides an essential guide to Court of Appeal cases.   THE PURPOSE OF THE GUIDE “The main purpose of this Guide is to set out as clearly as…

HOW FAR IS A SOLICITOR'S ESTIMATE OF COSTS BINDING? THE RELEVANT PRINCIPLES CONSIDERED AND APPLIED: A HIGH COURT APPEAL

HOW FAR IS A SOLICITOR’S ESTIMATE OF COSTS BINDING? THE RELEVANT PRINCIPLES CONSIDERED AND APPLIED: A HIGH COURT APPEAL

June 10, 2025 · by gexall · in Appeals, Applications, Assessment of Costs, Costs, Members Content

Many, if not all, litigators will be familiar with the scenario whereby an estimate of costs is given and events develop so that the estimate is overtaken.  This scenario was considered in the case we are considering today.   An estimate…

BECOME A MEMBER TO KEEP UP TO DATE: THIS SITE IS BECOMING A MEMBERSHIP SUBSCRIBER SITE - MAKING CLB BIGGER AND BETTER

BECOME A MEMBER TO KEEP UP TO DATE: THIS SITE IS BECOMING A MEMBERSHIP SUBSCRIBER SITE – MAKING CLB BIGGER AND BETTER

June 9, 2025 · by gexall · in Avoiding negligence claims, Case Management, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure

On the 10th June 2025* this site is becoming a membership site. All the past posts, and the vast majority of future posts will only be available to members who have joined.  This post explains what readers need to do…

WRITING TO THE JUDGE AFTER THE DRAFT JUDGMENT HAS BEEN SENT OUT: THIS IS NOT AN OPPORTUNITY TO ADVANCE FURTHER ARGUMENT

WRITING TO THE JUDGE AFTER THE DRAFT JUDGMENT HAS BEEN SENT OUT: THIS IS NOT AN OPPORTUNITY TO ADVANCE FURTHER ARGUMENT

June 5, 2025 · by gexall · in Appeals, Applications, Civil Procedure, Conduct, Members Content

There have been a large number of cases where the courts have been critical of attempt to “re-open” judgments at the stage where the draft judgment is circulated.  We see another example here. The judge reviewed the cases on this…

PERSONAL INJURY POINTS 7: THE COUNCIL WAS LIABLE FOR THE STATE OF AN UNADOPTED HIGHWAY: A FINDING FOR THE CLAIMANT WAS NOT A BRIDGE TOO FAR

PERSONAL INJURY POINTS 7: THE COUNCIL WAS LIABLE FOR THE STATE OF AN UNADOPTED HIGHWAY: A FINDING FOR THE CLAIMANT WAS NOT A BRIDGE TOO FAR

June 3, 2025 · by gexall · in Appeals, Members Content, Personal Injury

The issues of an occupier’s duty in relation to those walking along unadopted highways are always complex.  Here we look at a case where the claimant was successful in establishing a breach of duty following an injury she sustained when…

THE JUDGE WAS WRONG TO GRANT THE DEFENDANT SUMMARY JUDGMENT IN A PERSONAL INJURY CASE: THIS SHOULD NOT BE A "MINI TRIAL"

THE JUDGE WAS WRONG TO GRANT THE DEFENDANT SUMMARY JUDGMENT IN A PERSONAL INJURY CASE: THIS SHOULD NOT BE A “MINI TRIAL”

May 28, 2025 · by gexall · in Appeals, Applications, Civil evidence, Expert evidence, Members Content, Summary judgment, Witness statements

Today we are looking at a case where the claimants were successful on appeal in overturning an order granting the defendant summary judgment.  The case shows the limits of applications for summary judgment, in particular arguments that evidence was not…

INTEREST ON DAMAGES AND COSTS THAT HAVE TO BE REPAID FOLLOWING AN APPEAL: WHAT IS THE APPROPRIATE RATE?

May 28, 2025 · by gexall · in Appeals, Costs, Damages, Members Content, Personal Injury

Losing a case on appeal is always painful.  Having to repay the damages and costs that have been received is more painful still. Another element of pain is the fact that the losing party has to pay interest on the…

A SERVICE OF THE CLAIM FORM CASE WITH A TWIST IN THE TAIL: AND WHAT A TALE THIS IS...IT LEADS TO A LOT OF WASTED COSTS (AND A POTENTIAL WASTED COSTS ORDER)

A SERVICE OF THE CLAIM FORM CASE WITH A TWIST IN THE TAIL: AND WHAT A TALE THIS IS…IT LEADS TO A LOT OF WASTED COSTS (AND A POTENTIAL WASTED COSTS ORDER)

May 27, 2025 · by gexall · in Appeals, Applications, Avoiding negligence claims, Members Content, Service of the claim form, Serving documents, Setting aside judgment

Today we are looking at a case about a failure to serve the claim form properly. The claimant did not consider whether they knew, or had served, on the defendant’s “last known residence”.   As a result a default judgment, order…

PERSONAL INJURY POINTS 5: THE PUBLICAN WAS NOT VICARIOUSLY LIABLE FOR THE ACTS OF A SEPARATE SECURITY COMPANY

PERSONAL INJURY POINTS 5: THE PUBLICAN WAS NOT VICARIOUSLY LIABLE FOR THE ACTS OF A SEPARATE SECURITY COMPANY

May 23, 2025 · by gexall · in Appeals, Civil evidence, Members Content, Personal Injury

When a claimant is injured by  doormen working on licensed premises is the publican vicariously liable if the assailants were employed by a separate security company ? The answer is “it depends”. The issue is primarily one of control. It…

ANOTHER (YES ANOTHER) CASE OF FAKE AUTHORITIES BEING CITED TO THE COURT: APPEAL STRUCK OUT AS AN ABUSE OF PROCESS

ANOTHER (YES ANOTHER) CASE OF FAKE AUTHORITIES BEING CITED TO THE COURT: APPEAL STRUCK OUT AS AN ABUSE OF PROCESS

May 15, 2025 · by gexall · in Advocacy, Appeals, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Conduct, Members Content

Unbelievably we are looking at another case where the court found that false authorities had been cited to it.  The appeal was struck out as an abuse of process.   “In my judgment, the Court needs to take decisive action…

THE DEFENDANT'S DELAY LEADS TO COURT OF APPEAL REFUSING TO SET ASIDE DEFAULT JUDGMENT: THE IMPORTANCE OF BEING PROMPT

THE DEFENDANT’S DELAY LEADS TO COURT OF APPEAL REFUSING TO SET ASIDE DEFAULT JUDGMENT: THE IMPORTANCE OF BEING PROMPT

May 15, 2025 · by gexall · in Appeals, Members Content, Setting aside judgment

Today we are looking at a case where a defendant waited 16 months before applying to set aside a default judgment. That application to set aside was successful at first instance but overturned by the Court of Appeal. The Court…

COST BITES 233: VARDY -v- ROONEY: SOME EXTRA TIME ON THE COSTS ISSUES: CLAIMANT'S CONDUCT DID NOT CROSS THE LINE -NO REDUCTION OF COSTS OF APPEAL

COST BITES 233: VARDY -v- ROONEY: SOME EXTRA TIME ON THE COSTS ISSUES: CLAIMANT’S CONDUCT DID NOT CROSS THE LINE -NO REDUCTION OF COSTS OF APPEAL

April 29, 2025 · by gexall · in Appeals, Conduct, Costs, Members Content, Summary assessment,

In Rebekah Vardy v Coleen Rooney [2025] EWHC 1027 (KB) Mr Justice Cavanagh made some further costs rulings following the dismissal of the defendant’s appeal on issues relating to costs.  Firstly he rejected the defendant’s arguments that the claimant’s costs should be…

APPELLANT FILED APPEAL WITH TWO MINUTES TO SPARE: HOWEVER IT WAS FILED IMPROPERLY AND THE APPEAL DISMISSED: THE DANGERS OF HYPERLINKS...

APPELLANT FILED APPEAL WITH TWO MINUTES TO SPARE: HOWEVER IT WAS FILED IMPROPERLY AND THE APPEAL DISMISSED: THE DANGERS OF HYPERLINKS…

April 23, 2025 · by gexall · in Appeals, Applications, Avoiding negligence claims, Civil Procedure, Extensions of time, Members Content

The judgment of Mr Justice Dexter Dias in  Kumar v The General Medical Council (Rev1) [2025] EWHC 820 (Admin) contains an important lesson for all litigants. An appellant left filing a notice of appeal until two minutes before the expiry…

THREE VERSIONS OF A BUNDLE MADE THE HEARING SO UNFAIR AS TO REQUIRE A REHEARING

THREE VERSIONS OF A BUNDLE MADE THE HEARING SO UNFAIR AS TO REQUIRE A REHEARING

April 22, 2025 · by gexall · in Appeals, Bundles, Case Management, Civil Procedure, Members Content

If ever there was a case that emphasised the importance of bundles being checked prior to a hearing we see it here. In  RP v Barnsley Metropolitan District Council [2025] UKUT 46 (AAC) Upper Tribunal Judge Edward Jacobs found that…

EXPERT REPORTS AND CONDUCT CONSIDERED IN THE COURTS AGAIN: LEADS TO A DOCTOR BEING ERASED FROM THE REGISTER OF DOCTORS

EXPERT REPORTS AND CONDUCT CONSIDERED IN THE COURTS AGAIN: LEADS TO A DOCTOR BEING ERASED FROM THE REGISTER OF DOCTORS

April 17, 2025 · by gexall · in Appeals, Credibility of experts, Expert evidence, Experts, Members Content

The judgment in Moodliar v General Medical Council [2025] EWHC 913 (Admin) provides a salutary reminder to medical experts that giving expert evidence is a highly significant task.  Failures in the process can lead to erasure from the medical register,…

THE DENTON PRINCIPLES: RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS AND EXTENSIONS OF TIME TO APPEAL: A "NUANCED APPROACH" IS REQUIRED

THE DENTON PRINCIPLES: RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS AND EXTENSIONS OF TIME TO APPEAL: A “NUANCED APPROACH” IS REQUIRED

April 17, 2025 · by gexall · in Appeals, Extensions of time, Members Content, Relief from sanctions

In Yaxley-Lennon v HM Solicitor General [2025] EWCA Civ 476 the Court of Appeal considered the Denton principles in the context of extending time for permission to appeal.   The case emphasises that the absence of a good reason for default…

PROVING THINGS 260: COURT OF APPEAL JUDGMENT ON ADVERSE INFERENCES: "WE REJECT THIS NEW WAY OF PUTTING THE ADVERSE INFERENCE CASE"

PROVING THINGS 260: COURT OF APPEAL JUDGMENT ON ADVERSE INFERENCES: “WE REJECT THIS NEW WAY OF PUTTING THE ADVERSE INFERENCE CASE”

April 16, 2025 · by gexall · in Appeals, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Fatal Accidents, Members Content, Personal Injury

I am grateful to David Platt KC for drawing my attention to the Court of Appeal decision in Alexander Johnstone v Fawcett’s Garage (Newbury) Limited [2025] EWCA Civ 467, in particular to the judgment in relation to adverse inferences.  The Court of…

COST BITES 227 : THE JUDGE WAS RIGHT TO ORDER THE CLAIMANT TO PAY 80% OF THE COSTS OF TWO APPLICATIONS:  DECISION UPHELD ON APPEAL

COST BITES 227 : THE JUDGE WAS RIGHT TO ORDER THE CLAIMANT TO PAY 80% OF THE COSTS OF TWO APPLICATIONS: DECISION UPHELD ON APPEAL

April 16, 2025 · by gexall · in Appeals, Assessment of Costs, Conduct, Costs, Members Content

I am grateful to James Packer of Duncan Lewis for sending me a copy of the judgment of Mrs Justice Hill in Mlundira -v- The Secretary of State for the Home Department [2025] EWHC 189 (KB), a copy of which…

THE JUDGE SHOULD NOT HAVE OVERRIDDEN THE EVIDENCE OF THE (UNCHALLENGED) EXPERT WITNESS: CLAIMANT WAS ENTITLED TO DAMAGES FOR PSYCHIATRIC INJURY

THE JUDGE SHOULD NOT HAVE OVERRIDDEN THE EVIDENCE OF THE (UNCHALLENGED) EXPERT WITNESS: CLAIMANT WAS ENTITLED TO DAMAGES FOR PSYCHIATRIC INJURY

April 15, 2025 · by gexall · in Appeals, Civil evidence, Expert evidence, Experts, Members Content

In Sarah Jane Young v John Anthony Downey [2025] EWCA Civ 177 the Court of Appeal sent out another reminder that there are difficulties in trial judges attempting to override the views of expert witnesses.       “… in the circumstances…

CLAIMANT ENTITLED TO COSTS TO BE ASSESSED AFTER LATE ACCEPTANCE OF A PART 36 OFFER: EVEN THOUGH FIXED COSTS APPLIED AT THE TIME THE OFFER WAS MADE

April 11, 2025 · by gexall · in Appeals, Assessment of Costs, Costs, Fixed Costs, Members Content, Personal Injury

NB THIS DECISION WAS OVERTURNED BY THE COURT OF APPEAL IN  Attersley v UK Insurance Ltd [2026] EWCA Civ 217 I am grateful to barrister Thomas Mason for drawing my attention to the judgment today in Laura Attersley v UK…

VARDY -v- ROONEY: CLAIMANT'S ARGUMENT THAT DEFENDANT HAD BEEN GUILTY OF MISCONDUCT IN COSTS ASSESSMENT FAILS TO CROSS THE LINE

VARDY -v- ROONEY: CLAIMANT’S ARGUMENT THAT DEFENDANT HAD BEEN GUILTY OF MISCONDUCT IN COSTS ASSESSMENT FAILS TO CROSS THE LINE

April 10, 2025 · by gexall · in Appeals, Conduct, Costs, Costs budgeting, Members Content

In  Rebekah Vardy v Coleen Rooney [2025] EWHC 851 (KB) Mr Justice Cavanagh rejected the claimant’s arguments that the defendant’s solicitors had misconducted themselves improperly and that there should consequently be a disallowance of some of the costs claimed by the…

SERVICE OF THE CLAIM FORM: NO IMPLIED DUTY ON A CLAIMANT TO TAKE STEPS TO ENSURE THAT THE DEFENDANT IS STILL AT THE LAST KNOWN ADDRESS

SERVICE OF THE CLAIM FORM: NO IMPLIED DUTY ON A CLAIMANT TO TAKE STEPS TO ENSURE THAT THE DEFENDANT IS STILL AT THE LAST KNOWN ADDRESS

April 9, 2025 · by gexall · in Appeals, Applications, Avoiding negligence claims, Members Content, Service of the claim form, Serving documents

I am grateful to barrister Anthony Reddiford for sending me a copy of the judgment of HHJ Truman in  Aston -v- Tew & Alwyn Insurance Company Ltd [2025] EWCC 20 , a copy of which is available here. Aston -v-…

TIME FOR PERMISSION TO APPEAL: A "SECOND APPEAL": COURT REFUSES TO GRANT EXTENSION

TIME FOR PERMISSION TO APPEAL: A “SECOND APPEAL”: COURT REFUSES TO GRANT EXTENSION

March 21, 2025 · by gexall · in Appeals, Applications, Extensions of time, Members Content

For the second time this week we are looking at issues relating to extension of time and appeals. In Abbotsley Ltd v Pheasantland Ltd [2025] EWHC 654 (KB) HHJ Karen Walden-Smith provided a timely reminder that a party who wishes…

"A TRAP FOR THE UNWARY": WHEN DOES TIME FOR APPEALING START TO RUN WHEN A JUDGMENT IS SENT OUT? CLARITY IS ESSENTIAL

“A TRAP FOR THE UNWARY”: WHEN DOES TIME FOR APPEALING START TO RUN WHEN A JUDGMENT IS SENT OUT? CLARITY IS ESSENTIAL

March 18, 2025 · by gexall · in Appeals, Applications, Avoiding negligence claims, Extensions of time, Members Content

The judgment of Mr Justice Hayden in  F (A Minor) (Permission To Appeal) [2025] EWHC 638 (Fam) highlights a trap for those seeking permission to appeal.  The time for appealing runs from the date that the order was announced and…

COST BITES 222: A "RETROSPECTIVE" CONDITIONAL FEE AGREEMENT WAS STILL VALID AND THE PAYING PARTY HAD TO PAY: COURT OF APPEAL DECISION

COST BITES 222: A “RETROSPECTIVE” CONDITIONAL FEE AGREEMENT WAS STILL VALID AND THE PAYING PARTY HAD TO PAY: COURT OF APPEAL DECISION

March 14, 2025 · by gexall · in Appeals, Costs, Members Content

In Singh & Ors v Ingram [2025] EWCA Civ 264 the Court of Appeal rejected an argument that a retrospective conditional fee agreement was invalid. The Court was, to say the least, suspicious of argument that the receiving party’s solicitors…

COURT WAS CORRECT TO REFUSE TO GRANT RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS WHO WAS IN DEFAULT (OH, AND THE PROCEEDINGS HAD NEVER BEEN SERVED PROPERLY ANYWAY...)

COURT WAS CORRECT TO REFUSE TO GRANT RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS WHO WAS IN DEFAULT (OH, AND THE PROCEEDINGS HAD NEVER BEEN SERVED PROPERLY ANYWAY…)

March 12, 2025 · by gexall · in Appeals, Applications, Members Content, Relief from sanctions, Service of the claim form, Serving documents

In Lumsden v Charles [2025] EWCC 7 HHJ Peter Marquand refused a claimant’s application for relief from sanctions. The claimant had issued Part 8 proceedings but failed to serve the witness evidence and particulars with the proceedings by the rules. …

THE CURRENT IMPORTANCE OF PLEADINGS 1: FAILURE TO SERVE A REPLY ALLEGING FORGERY LEADS TO JUDGMENT AT TRIAL BEING SET ASIDE

THE CURRENT IMPORTANCE OF PLEADINGS 1: FAILURE TO SERVE A REPLY ALLEGING FORGERY LEADS TO JUDGMENT AT TRIAL BEING SET ASIDE

March 5, 2025 · by gexall · in Appeals, Applications, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Statements of Case

For some time now I have been meaning to write a series on the numerous issues that arise when cases are not pleaded properly.  There are a catalogue of cases where the parties come to court, normally shortly before (sometimes…

ANOTHER CASE INVOLVING BUNDLES: DIFFERENCES IN PAGINATION AND OTHER MISHAPS MEANT THAT A DECISION WAS UNFAIR AND THERE WAS AN ERROR OF LAW

ANOTHER CASE INVOLVING BUNDLES: DIFFERENCES IN PAGINATION AND OTHER MISHAPS MEANT THAT A DECISION WAS UNFAIR AND THERE WAS AN ERROR OF LAW

March 4, 2025 · by gexall · in Appeals, Bundles, Case Management, Civil Procedure, Members Content

In  RP v Barnsley Metropolitan District Council [2025] UKUT 46 (AAC) Edward Jacobs, Upper Tribunal Judge, found that the errors with bundles at a First-Tier Tribunal led to unfairness and amounted to a an error of law. “There were, as…

A QUICK POST ABOUT BUNDLES: THIS WAS "ALMOST UNUSABLE": "THE INDEX MUST IDENTIFY THE DOCUMENTS CONTAINED"

A QUICK POST ABOUT BUNDLES: THIS WAS “ALMOST UNUSABLE”: “THE INDEX MUST IDENTIFY THE DOCUMENTS CONTAINED”

February 28, 2025 · by gexall · in Appeals, Applications, Bundles, Members Content

There is an interesting postscript to the judgment of Judge Anthony Snelson in the case of  Soor v Luton Borough Council [2025] UKFTT 259 (GRC). It relates to bundles… … the bundle produced by the Council (over 600 pages long)…

COST BITES 219:  DISBURSEMENTS: WHAT IS A REASONABLE AND PROPORTIONAL INTERPRETER'S FEE? THE COURT MUST "HAVE REGARD TO THE MARKET"

COST BITES 219: DISBURSEMENTS: WHAT IS A REASONABLE AND PROPORTIONAL INTERPRETER’S FEE? THE COURT MUST “HAVE REGARD TO THE MARKET”

February 27, 2025 · by gexall · in Appeals, Assessment of Costs, Costs, Members Content

In  Santiago v Motor Insurers’ Bureau  ( The County Court at Central London, 22nd February 2025,available here Santiago v MIB Final)*  HHJ Dight CBE considered the issue of what was a reasonable and proportional interpreter’s fee.  The case had been…

FINDING OF FUNDAMENTAL DISHONESTY AT TRIAL OVERTURNED ON APPEAL: THE TRIAL JUDGE WAS WRONG TO RELY ON AN INJURY THAT DID NOT FORM PART OF THE CLAIMANT'S PLEADED CASE

FINDING OF FUNDAMENTAL DISHONESTY AT TRIAL OVERTURNED ON APPEAL: THE TRIAL JUDGE WAS WRONG TO RELY ON AN INJURY THAT DID NOT FORM PART OF THE CLAIMANT’S PLEADED CASE

February 26, 2025 · by gexall · in Appeals, Fundamental Dishonesty, Members Content, Personal Injury

I am grateful to Express Solicitors for sending me a copy of the judgment of HHK Baddeley in Robinson -v- UK Insurance Limited, a note that  case and of the judgment is available here -Robinson word . HHJ Baddeley was…

SENSIBLE STEPS TO TAKE WHEN THERE IS NO TRANSCRIPT OF A HEARING AVAILABLE

SENSIBLE STEPS TO TAKE WHEN THERE IS NO TRANSCRIPT OF A HEARING AVAILABLE

February 25, 2025 · by gexall · in Appeals, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content

A very short passage in the judgment of  Mr Justice Fancourt in Odhavji v Tighe & Ors [2025] EWHC 372 (Ch) sets out the steps a prudent party should take when a transcript (and sometimes a judgment) cannot be obtained. …

DOES A PROPOSED NEW DEFENDANT HAVE TO BE GIVEN NOTICE OF THE APPLICATION TO JOIN THEM INTO THE ACTION? TWO CONTRASTING VIEWS FROM THE COURT OF APPEAL

DOES A PROPOSED NEW DEFENDANT HAVE TO BE GIVEN NOTICE OF THE APPLICATION TO JOIN THEM INTO THE ACTION? TWO CONTRASTING VIEWS FROM THE COURT OF APPEAL

February 24, 2025 · by gexall · in Appeals, Applications, Civil Procedure, Members Content

In Noel Anthony Clarke v Guardian News & Media Ltd [2025] EWCA Civ 164 the Court of Appeal considered (but did not determine) the question of whether it was mandatory to give notice of the application to join a new defendant to…

CPR 11 AND THE PRINCIPLES IN HODDINOTT DO NOT APPLY IN A CASE WHERE THE COURT HAS NO JURISDICTION AT ALL: AN INTERESTING JUDGMENT

CPR 11 AND THE PRINCIPLES IN HODDINOTT DO NOT APPLY IN A CASE WHERE THE COURT HAS NO JURISDICTION AT ALL: AN INTERESTING JUDGMENT

February 19, 2025 · by gexall · in Appeals, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Sanctions, Striking out

I am grateful to Elliot Gold, barrister,  for sending me a copy of the decision of HHJ Bloom in Davidson -v- The London Centre of Psychodrama, a copy of which is available here  DavidsonJudgment.       The judge, among other…

WHEN A PARTY CITES, AND RELIES, ON CASE LAW THAT "DOES NOT EXIST" :"A MOST UNHAPPY FEATURE OF THIS CASE"

WHEN A PARTY CITES, AND RELIES, ON CASE LAW THAT “DOES NOT EXIST” :”A MOST UNHAPPY FEATURE OF THIS CASE”

January 31, 2025 · by gexall · in Appeals, Applications, Civil Procedure, Conduct, Members Content

There is a very unusual element to the judgment of Mr Justice Kerr in Olsen & Anor v Finansiel Stabilitet A/S [2025] EWHC 42 (KB). The appellants, litigants in person, relied on case law that apparently supported their case. That…

AN INSURER CAN CONTINUE AN APPEAL AFTER THE APPELLANT HAS BEEN DISSOLVED: JOIN ITSELF INTO THE ACTION

AN INSURER CAN CONTINUE AN APPEAL AFTER THE APPELLANT HAS BEEN DISSOLVED: JOIN ITSELF INTO THE ACTION

January 29, 2025 · by gexall · in Appeals, Civil Procedure, Members Content

The Court of Appeal decision in Birley & Anor v Heritage Independent Living Ltd [2025] EWCA Civ 44 also dealt with an interesting point of procedure. The appellant company had been dissolved shortly before the appeal was heard.  The Court of…

FAILING TO SERVE THE CLAIM FORM IS NOT AN "ABUSE OF PROCESS" SO AS TO LEAD TO QOCS BEING DISAPPLIED: COURT OF APPEAL DECISION

FAILING TO SERVE THE CLAIM FORM IS NOT AN “ABUSE OF PROCESS” SO AS TO LEAD TO QOCS BEING DISAPPLIED: COURT OF APPEAL DECISION

January 29, 2025 · by gexall · in Appeals, Applications, Avoiding negligence claims, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Personal Injury, QOCS

We are returning to the decision of the Court of Appeal in Court of Appeal in Birley & Anor v Heritage Independent Living Ltd [2025] EWCA Civ 44. The Court upheld a finding that the failure to serve the claim form, or…

AN APPLICATION - AND ORDER -  FOR A STAY OF PROCEEDINGS DOES NOT LEAD TO TIME FOR SERVICE OF THE CLAIM FORM BEING EXTENDED: A POINT TO WATCH

AN APPLICATION – AND ORDER – FOR A STAY OF PROCEEDINGS DOES NOT LEAD TO TIME FOR SERVICE OF THE CLAIM FORM BEING EXTENDED: A POINT TO WATCH

January 29, 2025 · by gexall · in Appeals, Avoiding negligence claims, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Service of the claim form

It was possible that we could get to the end of January without a claim form case being reported. It was, however, unlikely.  A failure to serve was one of the many issues considered by the Court of Appeal in…

ADVOCACY - THE JUDGE'S VIEW XIII: GUIDANCE ON SKELETON ARGUMENTS: "PUT YOURSELF IN THE POSITION OF THE JUDGE":  "DIFFICULT TO READ, DISGUSTING TO TOUCH AND IMPOSSIBLE TO UNDERSTAND. IT IS WORSE THAN NO SKELETON AT ALL"

ADVOCACY – THE JUDGE’S VIEW XIII: GUIDANCE ON SKELETON ARGUMENTS: “PUT YOURSELF IN THE POSITION OF THE JUDGE”: “DIFFICULT TO READ, DISGUSTING TO TOUCH AND IMPOSSIBLE TO UNDERSTAND. IT IS WORSE THAN NO SKELETON AT ALL”

January 22, 2025 · by gexall · in Appeals, Applications, Members Content, Useful links, Written advocacy

This post is another in the series of repeats of the series on advocacy. This blog has many posts that record cases where judges have been critical of the contents (and usually length) of skeleton arguments.  A remedy for most…

THE IMPORTANCE OF ADVOCATES WORKING WITHIN TIME ESTIMATES: COURT OF APPEAL POLICE THEIR PROCEDURE

THE IMPORTANCE OF ADVOCATES WORKING WITHIN TIME ESTIMATES: COURT OF APPEAL POLICE THEIR PROCEDURE

January 16, 2025 · by gexall · in Appeals, Applications, Case Management, Members Content, Written advocacy

In Chief Constable of Northamptonshire Police v Woodcock [2025] EWCA Civ 13 the Court of Appeal considered many significant issues relating to the civil liability of the police force. However this blog, being this blog, will defer consideration of those…

SEEKING PERMISSION TO APPEAL: WHEN IS THERE AN "ADJOURNED HEARING"? THE ISSUES CONSIDERED

SEEKING PERMISSION TO APPEAL: WHEN IS THERE AN “ADJOURNED HEARING”? THE ISSUES CONSIDERED

January 2, 2025 · by gexall · in Appeals, Avoiding negligence claims, Extensions of time, Members Content

The question of when a hearing has been adjourned and when time starts running for applying to the trial judge for permission to appeal was considered by  Mr Justice Freedman in Mex Group Worldwide Limited v Stewart Owen Ford & Ors [2024]…

JUDGE OVERTURNS NON-PARTY COSTS ORDER AGAINST CLAIMS MANAGEMENT COMPANY: ANOTHER (EXPENSIVE) BATTLE IN THE "NEVER-ENDING WAR"

JUDGE OVERTURNS NON-PARTY COSTS ORDER AGAINST CLAIMS MANAGEMENT COMPANY: ANOTHER (EXPENSIVE) BATTLE IN THE “NEVER-ENDING WAR”

January 2, 2025 · by gexall · in Appeals, Applications, Costs, Members Content

I am grateful to Navid Hakimmaani, Consultant Solicitor at Collins Benson Goldhill LLP,  for sending me a copy of the judgment of HHJ Mark Gargan in Smith -v- AXA Insurance UK PlC & Spectra Drive Limited (24th December 2024), a…

COST BITES 204: A SUCCESS FEE CANNOT BE RECOVERED AS DAMAGES: SUPREME COURT DECISION: "AN ORDER THAT PROVIDES FOR ONE PARTY TO PAY ANOTHER PARTY'S COSTS IS A COSTS ORDER"

COST BITES 204: A SUCCESS FEE CANNOT BE RECOVERED AS DAMAGES: SUPREME COURT DECISION: “AN ORDER THAT PROVIDES FOR ONE PARTY TO PAY ANOTHER PARTY’S COSTS IS A COSTS ORDER”

December 31, 2024 · by gexall · in Appeals, Assessment of Costs, Costs, Members Content, Success Fees, Webinar

In Hirachand v Hirachand & Anor [2024] UKSC 43 the Supreme Court dismissed the idea that an award to a claimant could be increased to take account of the fact that the claimant was liable to pay a success fee…

CLAIMANT IS SUCCESSFUL ON APPEAL, BUT DEFENDANT’S PART 36 OFFER MEANS THAT CLAIMANT PAYS THE COSTS: A REMINDER THAT PART 36 REMAINS IMPORTANT – EVEN AT THE APPEAL STAGE

December 16, 2024 · by gexall · in Appeals, Costs, Members Content, Part 36

I am grateful to my colleague Steven Turner for sending me a copy of the Court of Appeal decision on costs in  Majid -v- HSF Logistics Polksa AP.ZO.,  a copy of which is available here CA Decision on Costs (and…

IT IS NEVER TOO LATE IN THE YEAR FOR A NEW CLAIM FORM CASE: COURT OF APPEAL OVERTURN ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR SERVICE

IT IS NEVER TOO LATE IN THE YEAR FOR A NEW CLAIM FORM CASE: COURT OF APPEAL OVERTURN ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR SERVICE

December 11, 2024 · by gexall · in Appeals, Civil Procedure, Extensions of time, Members Content, Service of the claim form, Serving documents

In Secretary of State for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities v Rogers [2024] EWCA Civ 1554 the Court of Appeal overturned a decision that granted a claimant an extension of time for service of the claim form.  The case is…

COURT OF APPEAL FIND THAT CLAIMANT'S ACTION AGAINST "WRONG" DEFENDANT SHOULD NOT HAVE BEEN STRUCK OUT: PERMISSION TO AMEND THE CLAIM SHOULD HAVE BEEN GIVEN

COURT OF APPEAL FIND THAT CLAIMANT’S ACTION AGAINST “WRONG” DEFENDANT SHOULD NOT HAVE BEEN STRUCK OUT: PERMISSION TO AMEND THE CLAIM SHOULD HAVE BEEN GIVEN

December 11, 2024 · by gexall · in Amendment, Appeals, Applications, Members Content, Striking out

I am grateful to barrister James Patience for sending me a copy of the Court of Appeal judgment in ELYSA ALTON  and – POWSZECHNY ZAKLAD UBEZPIECZEN [2024] EWCA Civ 1435. The Court of Appeal upheld the decision of a Circuit…

COST BITES 201: COUNCIL NOT GRANTED PERMISSION TO APPEAL ON "ACADEMIC" POINTS WHERE THE REAL ISSUE WAS ABOUT COSTS

COST BITES 201: COUNCIL NOT GRANTED PERMISSION TO APPEAL ON “ACADEMIC” POINTS WHERE THE REAL ISSUE WAS ABOUT COSTS

December 10, 2024 · by gexall · in Appeals, Applications, Costs, Members Content

In London Borough of Sutton v Betts [2024] EWCA Civ 1492 the Court of Appeal refused the defendant council’s application for permission to appeal.  The claimant tenant had found accommodation and, as between the parties, the points on appeal were…

ITS NOT TOO LATE IN THE YEAR FOR "CLAIM FORM" CASES: JUDGE ALLOWS APPEAL AND GRANTS CLAIMANT EXTENSION OF TIME TO SERVE THE PARTICULARS OF CLAIM: CPR 3.9 & DENTON DID NOT APPLY

ITS NOT TOO LATE IN THE YEAR FOR “CLAIM FORM” CASES: JUDGE ALLOWS APPEAL AND GRANTS CLAIMANT EXTENSION OF TIME TO SERVE THE PARTICULARS OF CLAIM: CPR 3.9 & DENTON DID NOT APPLY

December 6, 2024 · by gexall · in Appeals, Avoiding negligence claims, Extensions of time, Members Content, Relief from sanctions, Service of the claim form, Serving documents, Uncategorized

I am grateful to solicitor Chris Topping of Broudie Jackson Canter for sending me a copy of the judgment of HHJ Bird in Brown -v- the Chief Constable of Greater Manchester Police (5th December 2024). The judge allowed an appeal against the…

CLAIMANT WAS ENTITLED TO COST OF CAR HIRE DESPITE HIS CAR NOT HAVING A VALID MOT CERTIFICATE: COURT OF APPEAL DECISION TODAY

CLAIMANT WAS ENTITLED TO COST OF CAR HIRE DESPITE HIS CAR NOT HAVING A VALID MOT CERTIFICATE: COURT OF APPEAL DECISION TODAY

December 4, 2024 · by gexall · in Appeals, Civil evidence, Damages, Members Content

In the judgment today in Ali v HSF Logistics Polska SP ZOO [2024] EWCA Civ 1479 (04 December 2024) the Court of Appeal overturned a finding that the absence of a MOT Certificate meant that a claimant could not make…

THE JUDGE SHOULD HAVE GRANTED AN ADJOURNMENT OF THE TRIAL: STRIKING OUT OF THE ACTION WHEN CLAIMANT DID NOT ATTEND THE PTR OVERTURNED ON APPEAL

THE JUDGE SHOULD HAVE GRANTED AN ADJOURNMENT OF THE TRIAL: STRIKING OUT OF THE ACTION WHEN CLAIMANT DID NOT ATTEND THE PTR OVERTURNED ON APPEAL

November 22, 2024 · by gexall · in Adjournments, Applications, Members Content

The judgment of Mrs Justice Hill in Attaei v Alsharif & Ors [2024] EWHC 2972 (KB) is the second case this month where an appeal has been allowed against a refusal to grant an adjournment. In this case, however, the…

← Previous 1 … 4 5 6 … 19 Next →

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email. Subscription notifies you of a new post, it does not give you access to members' content.

Join 12.3K other subscribers

Recent Posts

  • AN OFFER TO SETTLE THAT DOES NOT INCLUDE PROVISION FOR COSTS MAY WELL BE INEFFECTIVE: IT CERTAINLY WILL NOT LEAD TO A PETITION BEING STRUCK OUT: COURT OF APPEAL DECISION TODAY
  • IF YOU ARE ASKING FOR AN EXPEDITED TRIAL – MAKE SURE YOU ARE AVAILABLE…: JUDGE SAYS THE PARTIES SHOULD HAVE CHECKED THIS ISSUE
  • COST BITES 398: MORE BUDGETING IN THE MERCEDES-BENZ LITIGATION: ONLY A “MODEST” REDUCTION OF £1 MILLION HERE: BUT WHY (THE COURT ASKS) WEREN’T REALISTICALLY REDUCED FIGURES PUT FORWARD IN THE FIRST PLACE?
  • THROWBACK FRIDAY: “ADVOCACY – THE JUDGE’S VIEW: “AVOID BULLSHIT, SMOKE AND MIRRORS” (OH AND “WELL PADDED VANITY” (JUNE 2016
  • WHOSE EXPERT EVIDENCE IS GOING TO BE ACCEPTED AT TRIAL? (CLINICAL NEGLIGENCE): WEBINAR 10th JUNE 2026

Top Posts

  • A FIRM OF SOLICITORS ISSUED PROCEEDINGS WITHOUT AUTHORITY TO DO SO: ORDERED TO PAY £900,000 ON ACCOUNT OF COSTS: SOME EXPENSIVE LESSONS HERE...
  • COST BITES 386: THREATS TO REPORT THE DEFENDANTS' SOLICITORS TO THE SRA WAS ONE OF THE REASONS THE CLAIMANT HAD TO PAY COSTS ON AN INDEMNITY BASIS: WEAPONISERS BEWARE
  • ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND THE CITATION OF MISLEADING AUTHORITIES: ANOTHER WEEK, ANOTHER CASE: IF YOUR NAME IS ON THE DOCUMENT YOU "OWN" IT...
  • THROWBACK FRIDAY: LAWYERS FAILURE TO PROVIDE OVERSIGHT OF EXPERTS LEADS TO EXCLUSION OF THEIR EVIDENCE: EXPERT EVIDENCE IS “NOT A MATTER OF RIGHT” (MAY 2021)
  • COST BITES 385: THE COURTS SHOULD BE WARY OF DECIDING PRELIMINARY APPLICATIONS AND ISSUES ON A PROVISIONAL ASSESSMENT: THIS COULD UNDERMINE THE WHOLE PURPOSE OF THE REGIME

Archives

Blogroll

  • Fatal Accident Law
  • Legal Futures
  • Personal injury: Liability and Damages

Books

  • Munkman & Exall on Damages for Personal Injuries and Death 15th ed
  • The APIL Guide to Fatal Accidents 4th edition

Useful Links

  • Buntools (for preparing PDF Bundles)
  • Kings Chambers
  • Kings Chambers Costs & Litigation Funding
  • Kings Chambers Serious Injury
  • The Civil Procedure Rules
  • The Law Society Gazette
  • The National Archives Recently Published Judgments
  • The Senior Court Costs Office Guide 2025
  • www.Bailii.org

Copyright

© Gordon Exall, Exall Legal Training, Civil Litigation Brief, 2013-2026. Unauthorised use and or duplication of the material contained on this blog without permission is strictly prohibited.
Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.

To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
  • Membership Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Advertising Policy
  • Copyright
  • Legal Disclaimer

Copyright © 2026 Civil Litigation Brief ®

Powered by Big Yellow Workshop

Loading Comments...

You must be logged in to post a comment.