MORE ABOUT WITNESS STATEMENTS AND CONTEMPORARY EVIDENCE: THE RULE OF RECENT FABRICATION
The post on the decision in Bartlett -v- The English Cricket Board Association of Cricket Officials 2015 WL 5037730 led to an interesting comment. However that comment, in itself, leads to further interesting questions about the use of witness statements….
THE LYING WITNESS: THE APPROACH OF THE CIVIL COURTS
Mr Justice Smith has observed that “witnesses can regularly lie”. How do lies impact upon the judge’s assessment of that witness and the case generally. Further problems occur when both parties are lying. Here we look at some of the important judgments…
ASKING LEADING QUESTIONS AND WITNESS STATEMENTS: THIS IS GOING TO END BADLY: EIGHT CRUCIAL POINTS ON EVIDENCE (& THEN 10 MORE)
I am returning to the judgment of Mr Justice Jay in Susan Saunderson & Others -v- Sonae Industria (UK) Ltd [2015] EWCA 2264 (QB). Among other things this case emphasises the dangers of leading questions when interviewing witnesses. There are dangers…
A FAILURE TO DISCLOSE CAN BE JUST AS TELLING AS DISCLOSURE ITSELF: EVIDENCE, INFERENCES AND THE BLUE ANGEL CASE
The decision of Mr Robin Hollington QC (Sitting as a Deputy Judge of the Chancery Division) in Davy -v- Croxen [2015] EWHC 2372 (Ch) (“The Blue Angel case”) contains some illuminating observations about the practicalities and costs of disclosure and…
WITNESSES WHO DID NOT DRAFT (OR UNDERSTAND) THEIR STATEMENTS, WOULD BE "EXPERTS" AND OTHER WITNESS WOES.
Hot on the heels of my posing the question whether 278 years of judicial prompting on witness statements had led to any results comes the decision today of Mr Justice Andrew Smith in Michael Norcross -v- The Estate of Christos…
WITNESS STATEMENTS AND EVIDENCE: AFTER 278 YEARS OF JUDICIAL PROMPTING HAVE PRACTITIONERS GOT THE MESSAGE?
Often (once a month or so but sometimes more frequently) this blog considers a case where the judge has been critical of the witness evidence in written form. Often because the evidence is irrelevant, argumentative and consists of submissions. This…
EXPERT WITNESSES IN INSURANCE CASES 1: INVOLNERT MANAGEMENT
In Involnert Management Inc -v- AIS Insurance Services Limited [2015] EWHC 2225 (Comm) Mr Justice Leggatt considered the evidence of experts in a case between insurer and insured and, more particularly,between the insured and insurance broker. THE CASE The defendants…
WITNESS CREDIBILITY: PROBLEM WITH DEFENDANTS' EVIDENCE
The recent posts on witness credibility have given rise to much attention. Matthew Stockwell, junior counsel for the claimant, has pointed out that the case of Pollock -v- Cahill [2015] EWHC 2260 (QB) also involves an assessment of witness evidence….
WITNESS CREDIBILITY AGAIN: THE HIDDEN VICTIMS OF PERSONAL INJURY FRAUD: HONEST CLAIMANTS
This post should serve as a necessary balance/counterblast to the earlier post on the Sonae Industria case. In that case some of the witnesses were found to be honest and some patently dishonest. It was a feature of that case…
WITNESS EVIDENCE: CREDIBILITY;FACEBOOK;TWITTER AND THE CLAIMS GO UP IN SMOKE…
This blog has looked at issues relating to witness credibility many times. It is one of the most under-examined aspects of the civil litigation process. The decision of Mr Justice Jay in Susan Saunderson & Others -v- Sonae Industria (UK)…
THE CHIPS ARE DOWN FOR EXPERT WHO FAILED TO DECLARE AN INTEREST
In The Ritz Hotel Casino Ltd -v- Al Geabury [2015] EWHC 2294(QB) Mrs Justice Simler DBE was critical of an expert who failed to declare an interest in a case. The expert had become a treating doctor. “It was no…
THIS "PROBLEM" WITH WITNESSES: IT IS NOT A ONE WAY STREET: DEFENDANT'S EVIDENCE NOT BELIEVED
Much attention is, rightly, paid to the actions of evidence of claimants who bring fraudulent claims or give untrue evidence. However it is important to remember that this issue with evidence is not a one way street. There are plenty…
STRIKING OUT WITNESS STATEMENTS BECAUSE OF IRRELEVANT MATERIAL AND "SIGNIFICANT DEVELOPMENTS" IN RELATION TO CHANGES OF COSTS BUDGETS
The Mitchell libel case led to a number of interlocutory hearings and applications, some of which had a profound effect on civil procedure (for a while at least). The case of Yeo -v- Times Newspapers Ltd is also leading to…
IS A FALSE AFFIDAVIT WORSE THAN A FALSE WITNESS STATEMENT? THE HIGH COURT CONSIDERS THE POINT
In International Sports Tours -v- Shorey [2015] EWHC 2040 (QB) Mr Justice Green considered some interesting issues relating to committal for contempt, witness statements and affidavits. THE ACTION The claimant brought an action against a former employee and others claiming breach…
RECONSTRUCTION AND RECOLLECTION: HONEST WITNESSES GET THINGS WRONG: WHICH WITNESS WILL BE BELIEVED
The case of Wright -v- Lewis Silkin LLP [2015] EWHC 1897 (QB) has been widely reported. Some report it as a case where a solicitor’s evidence was not believed. This is grossly unfair. This case is another example of the…
MAKING A FINDING OF FRAUD WITHOUT EVIDENCE 3: THE COURTS ARE NOT EASILY AFFRONTED
For the third time in a fortnight the courts have sent out a clear message of the dangers of judges making findings of fraud without having all the evidence to hand. THE CASE In Alpha Rocks Solicitors -v- Alade [2015]…
JUDGES AND WITNESSES 4: THE LITIGANT IN PERSON AND THE ABSENT WITNESS
In Otou -v- Brierley [2015] EWHC 1938 (Ch) Edward Murray (sitting as s Deputy Judge of the Chancery Division) was in an unusual situation. A witness statement drafted by a litigant in person contrasted to a witness statement by a…
JUDGES AND WITNESSES 3: "UNCHALLENGED" EVIDENCE AND CREDIBILITY
In Various Claimants -v- Giambrone [2015] EWHC 1946 (QB) Mr Justice Foskett looked at issues relating to the credibility of witnesses where it was alleged that their evidence had not been “challenged” in certain respects. “…the days of the “I…
JUDGES AND WITNESSES 2: POISE AND POLISH IS FAR FROM CONCLUSIVE
This is the second post today on the issue of how judges assess witnesses. In Mudroglu -v- Reddish LLP [2015] EWHC 1044 (Ch) His Honour Judge Keyser QC had to consider issues relating to the credibility of two witnesses. THE…
JUDGES AND WITNESSES 1: IT WAS A LONG TIME AGO
There have been a number of cases recently where the courts have considered, expressly, how they should approach witness evidence. The first, Axa -v- Arab Insurance Group [2015] EWHC 1939 (Comm) related to witnesses who had to consider matters after…
MORE ON WITNESS CREDIBILITY: THE DOG THAT OBTAINED A MBA (WITH BETTER GRADES THAN THE WITNESS)
The post on the Canadian case of The Hearing Clinic (Niagara Falls) -v- Ontario 2014 ONAC 5831 attracted a lot of views and a lot of comments. I am grateful to Chris Rees for pointing out the judgment of Mr…
A TRIAL WITHOUT WITNESSES: THE PRACTICAL CONSEQUENCES: DUNNAGE -v- RANDALL
The Court of Appeal decision today in Dunnage -v- Randall [2015] EWCA Civ 673 is one of those seminal cases that every tort law student will have to read. Here we look at the case and the procedure. In particular…
HOW THE COURT ASSESSES WITNESSES: NOT A NUMBERS GAME
In TM -v- St George’s Healthcare NHS Trust [2015] EWHC 1866 (QB) Sir David Eady considered the judicial approach to witnesses and the burden of proof, stressing that the assessment of evidence is not a “numbers game”, THE CASE The…
SIMILAR FACT EVIDENCE IN CIVIL PROCEEDINGS: A REVIEW OF THE CASES
In MRH -v- The County Court Sitting at Manchester [2015] EWHC 1795(Admin) considered earlier there was a tantalisingly short reference to similar fact evidence. This was not considered in detail by the Administrative Court, however it does highlight some interesting…
IF FINDINGS OF DISHONESTY ARE TO BE MADE THEN WITNESSES HAVE TO BE HEARD
Two cases in two days have shown the difficulties that arise when findings of dishonesty are made by judges without hearing evidence. Here we look at the difficulties that arose when a judge held a trial without hearing evidence and…
CAUSATION AND EVIDENCE – A BURNING PROBLEM? IMPORTANT ISSUES FROM A BIZARRE SET OF FACTS
In Graves -v- Brouwer [2015] EWCA Civ 595 the Court of Appeal carried out an extensive review of the principles and authorities relating to evidence and causation. There is a useful discussion on the role and questioning of experts at…
IF YOU CAN'T PROVE IT YOU DON'T GET IT: CALLING EVIDENCE AT COURT TO PROVE A LOSS: A WORKING EXAMPLE
A party claiming damages must bring evidence to court to prove the losses it claims. This is a simple statement. However adducing evidence which actually proves the losses claimed often gives rise to difficulties in all spheres of litigation. The…
OPINION EVIDENCE IN WITNESS STATEMENTS AND THE CASE THAT MAY HAVE SPARKED OFF THE JACKSON REFORMS: Multiplex -v- Cleveland Bridge
Whilst doing some work on the problems caused when lay witnesses attempt to give expert evidence I came across the case of Multiplex Constructions (UK) LImited -v- Cleveland Bridge UK Limited [2008] EWHC 2220(TCC). It makes interesting reading for a…
EXPERT REPORTS: TOO LONG AND NOT MUCH USE: CARE EXPERTS MUST TAKE MORE CARE
In the case of Harman -v- East Kent Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2015] EWHC 1662 (QB) Mr Justice Turner had some very clear criticisms of the expert reports. Some of the comments are of general importance. “Against the background of…
THE MEETING OF EXPERTS: CASE LAW AND GUIDANCE
The case of Cintas Corp No 2 -v- Rhino Developments (2015 Ch D Newey J 10/6/2015) * reported on Lawtel today provides an interesting scenario in relation to the conduct of an expert and joint meetings. There is relatively little…
WITNESS EVIDENCE, CLINICAL NEGLIGENCE AND CLINICAL NOTES: A CASE IN POINT
The judgment of Mr Justice Jay in FB -v- Rana & Princes Alexandra Hospital NHS Trust [2015] EWHC 1536 contains another interesting consideration of the value of witness evidence and contemporary records in a clinical negligence case. I was recently…
EXPERTS GOING ON A FROLIC: A FAMILY LAW CASE WHERE THE EXPERT WITNESS WAS "THOROUGHLY UNHELPFUL"
The conduct of experts has been considered many times on this blog. There is an interesting example of problems caused in the context of family law in M -v- M [2015] EWFC B63. Here we have an expert going well…
PHONE HACKING, MISSING DOCUMENTS AND THE ABSENT WITNESS: IMPORTANT ISSUES OF CIVIL EVIDENCE
The issues raised in the “phone hacking” trial are well known. However Mr Justice Mann also made some important observations about civil evidence. In particular the inferences to be drawn when witnesses are not called or evidence not available. These…
GET AN INJUNCTION – PAY £27 MILLION IN DAMAGES: A POINT WORTH REMEMBERING
The judgment in AstraZeneca AB -v- KRKA dd Novo Mesto [2015] EWCA Civ 484 is one that should be read by anyone thinking of applying for an injunction and giving an undertaking in damages. The claimant obtained an injunction and…
APPEALS AGAINST DECISION TO ALLOW EXPERT EVIDENCE: DEFENDANTS TOLD TO GET ON THEIR BIKE
Appeals against orders granting permission for parties to call expert witnesses are rare. It is worthwhile, therefore, reading the judgment of Mr Justice Green in Allen -v- Cornwall Council [2015] EWCA Civ 1461 (QB) with some care. THE CASE The…
PROOF OF FACTS: THE BASIC PRINCIPLES SUMMARISED (BORROWING FROM THE FAMILY COURTS)
In a short judgment BR (Proof of Facts) [2015] EWFC 41 Mr Justice Peter Jackson provides a summary of key issues in relation to evidence. The judgment is specifically in relation fact finding in children cases. However part of the…
APPEALING ON THE JUDGE'S FINDINGS OF FACTS: A TRIAL IS NOT A DRESS REHEARSAL BUT "THE FIRST AND LAST NIGHT OF THE SHOW"
In the decision in Watson Farley and Williams -v- Ostrovizky today [2015] EWCA Civ 457 the Court of Appeal emphasised the difficulties of a party appealing findings of facts by the trial judge. “The aptness of the metaphor relating to…
"FUNDAMENTAL DISHONESTY" AND STRIKING OUT IN PERSONAL INJURY CASES: TEN KEY PROCEDURAL POINTS
The rule as to “fundamental” dishonesty has attracted a lot of attraction (and a lot of heated debate). However there has been very little examination of the details of the Act and the consequent procedural implications. There are 10 key…
AN EXPERT MUST DISCLOSE DETAILS OF PROFESSIONAL RELATIONSHIP WITH A PARTY OTHERWISE THE CONSEQUENCES CAN BE DIRE: EXP -v- BARKER
The facts in relation to the Defendant’s expert witness in the case of EXP -v- Barker [2015] EWHC 1289 (QB) are quite remarkable. The case shows the importance of an expert disclosing their history of dealing with the person on…
LETTERS OF EXPLANATION NOT GOOD ENOUGH: SOLICITOR SHOULD HAVE EXPLAINED MATTERS TO THE CLIENT: COURT OF APPEAL UPHOLD DECISION ON SOLICITOR'S NEGLIGENCE
In Procter -v- Raleys Solicitors [2015] EWCA Civ 400 the Court of Appeal upheld a decision at first instance that a failure to give an oral explanation to a client was negligent. The solicitors could not simply rely on standard…
INTERIM PAYMENTS; SERIOUS INJURY; ACCOMMODATION AND EELES
The very first post on this blog was a review of the law relating to interim payments in personal injury cases after Eeles. This issue was raised against in the decision of Grainger -v- Cooper [2015] EWHC 1132 (QB). THE…
FAILURE TO GIVE ADEQUATE REPLIES TO PART 18 QUESTIONS LEADS TO ACTION BEING STRUCK OUT: RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS REFUSED
In his judgment today in Griffith -v- Gourgey [2015] EWHC 1080 (Ch) Mr Justice Simon addressed the issue of whether an action stands struck out if a party gives inadequate replies to Part 18 questions after a peremptory order has…
ANOTHER LATE WITNESS STATEMENT: RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS REFUSED
There is a brief report on Lawtel of the decision of Judge Robinson in Buswell -v- Symes (QBD 20/04/2015) this involves another case where a witness statement was served late and permission to rely upon that statement was refused. *…
COURT CANNOT RE-OPEN "FINAL JUDGMENT": ISSUES RELATING TO DEFENDANT'S CAPACITY: EVESHAM –v- WERRETT CONSIDERED
In the judgment today in Eversham & Pershore Housing Association Ltd -v- Werrett [2015] EWHC 1060 (QB) Mr Justice Nicol held that the court could not re-open a decision because of later evidence in relation to the defendant’s capacity. THE…
WITNESS STATEMENTS AND AVOIDING JAIL: ARE YOU PROTECTING YOUR CLIENTS AND PROTECTING YOURSELF?
In the recent case of Hughmans -v- Dunhill [2015] EWHC 716 (Ch) an interesting point arose about the drafting of a witness statement when a (former) client alleged that it had largely been drafted by her (former) solicitor. The assertion…
THE "URGENT NEED FOR COMMERCIAL PRACTITIONERS TO BRING A SENSE OF PROPORTION" TO LITIGATION: EVIDENCE NEEDED IN WHEN ARGUING SECURITY FOR COSTS "STIFLES" AN ACTION.
In Kazakhstan Kagazy Plc -v- Baglan Zhunus [2015] EWHC 996 Mr Justice Walker had strong words to say, and constructive guidance to give, in relation to some aspects of commercial litigation. The case further serves as a reminder of the…
WITNESS STATEMENTS, EXHIBITS AND NOT MAKING AN EXHIBITION OF YOURSELF: THE OFTEN IGNORED RULES ABOUT EXHIBITS TO WITNESS STATEMENTS
Your life will not be complete unless you have read a post about exhibits to witness statements. The “exhibiting” of documents is common. It is surprising how common it is for the exhibit, and the witness statement, to fail to…
PLEADING, PARTICULARITY, SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND STRIKING OUT: WAIT UNTIL AFTER DISCLOSURE
In Dellal -v- Dellal [2015] EWHC 907 (Fam) Mr Justice Mostyn made some important observations about the need for particularity in pleading THE CASE The claimant was bringing an action under the Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975…
CHANGES TO THE PRE-ACTION PROTOCOLS THAT WE KNOW ABOUT: LOW VALUE ROAD TRAFFIC ACCIDENTS
Important changes have been made to the Pre-Action Protocols which came into force yesterday. At the moment the whereabout of the the Protocols is a mystery in that they have not been published generally. However there are some changes to…
FATAL ACCIDENT AND FATAL PLEADINGS: THE NEED TO PLEAD AND PROVE FOREIGN LAW
On the face of it the case of Bianco -v- Bennett [2015] EWHC 626 (QB) is simply a case about fatal accidents. I was going to discuss it solely on the Fatal Accident Blog. On close reading, however, it reveals…
You must be logged in to post a comment.