NO SPECIFIC FORM OF WRITTEN NOTICE IS REQUIRED TO WITHDRAW A PART 36 OFFER: THE ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES OF LEAVING A PART 36 OFFER OPEN
Part 36 offers are relatively easy to withdraw. This is demonstrated by the decision of Flaux J in of Supergroup Plc v JustEnough Software Corp Inc where he rejected an application for a declaration that the the claimant had validly…
ALLOCATION BETWEEN THE SMALL CLAIMS TRACK AND THE FAST TRACK: WHAT IS MEANT BY "ANY AMOUNT NOT IN DISPUTE"?
In the case of Akhtar -v- Boland [2014] EWCA Civ 872 the Court of Appeal gave guidance on CPR 26 and the matters to be considered when a determination is made as to allocation between the Fast Track and the…
WITNESS STATEMENTS CANNOT BE RELIED ON AT TRIAL IF SERVED LATE AND RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS NOT GIVEN
Lawtel today reported the case of Davies -v- Liberty Place [2014] EWHC 2034 (Admin). In that case Leggatt J stated that a party who served a witness statement late was not automatically precluded from relying on that statement at trial….
PRO BONO COSTS ORDERS: THE SECTION, GUIDES AND LINKS
I am grateful to Nick Hanning for pointing out one aspect of the judgement in the recent Paratus case that he, rightly, says would benefit from wider publicity. The Court made a Pro Bono Costs order under section 194…
GIVING EVIDENCE CAN BE A GRIZZLY BUSINESS: HOW DO THE COURTS ASSESS WHOSE ACCOUNT IS CORRECT?
In Grizzly Business Ltd -v- Stena Drilling Ltd [2014] EWHC 1920 (Comm) a judge had to decide between two competing versions of what was said in a telephone call three years earlier in a case when $2.5 million was at…
NO RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS AFTER APPELLANT FAILED TO FILE TRANSCRIPTS ON TIME.
In Patterson -v- Spencer [2014] EWHC 1878 (Ch) Henry Carr QC (sitting as a High Court Judge) refused an appellant’s application for relief from sanctions after she failed to file transcripts of the initial hearing. THE FACTS One of the defendants,…
ANOTHER CASE WHERE PARTY REFUSED RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS FOLLOWING LATE SERVICE OF WITNESS STATEMENT
The case of Swinden -v- Grima (Nicol J) 18/06/2014 is briefly reported on Lawtel (20th June). It is another example of the court refusing permission to serve witness statements late. THE FACTS The defendant served a witness statement on the…
MORE ABOUT SETTING ASIDE JUDGMENT AND CPR 3.9: NEWLAND -v- TOBA CONSIDERED
The question of whether CPR 3.9 and the Mitchell criteria apply to applications to have judgment set aside is an issue that has been considered several times on this blog. In a decision yesterday Newland -v- Trading FZC (& other)…
RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS FOLLOWING LATE FAILURE TO SERVE WITNESS STATEMENT: ONE OUT OF THREE MAY NOT BE ENOUGH
In Cranford Community College -v- Cranford College Ltd (16/06/2014 IPEC Judge Hacon) the court granted relief from sanctions following late service of a witness statement. (The case was reported on Lawtel on the 18th June 2014). THE FACTS The action…
WELL WHAT SHOULD THE TEST FOR RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS BE? YOUR CHANCE TO COMMENT
“Is there not a more imaginative way to encourage parties to co-operate? Looking at some of the circumstances litigation had been utterly derailed due to satellite litigation. This is inappropriate in 99% of cases. We need a message saying that…
LEEDS LAW SOCIETY MEET THE JUDGES EVENT: JACKSON ONE YEAR (AND A FEW MONTHS) ON
Yesterday evening Leeds Law Society held a “meet the judges” evening when practitioners met local judges and court staff to discuss issues arising out of the implementation of the Jackson reforms. Some of the issues were specific to Leeds but most…
COURT OF APPEAL SANCTIONS HEARING: SUBMISSIONS IN UTILISE -V- DAVIES
The final tranche of the notes taking at the hearing of the sanctions cases yesterday. The case of Utilise -v- Davies. Discussion of the first instance decision can be found in this blog as can a link to the transcript….
RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS FOLLOWING FAILURE TO FILE FUNDING INFORMATION AT START OF COSTS ASSESSMENT: MERCANTILE COURT DECISION
In Warner -v- Merrett (QBD Merc 12/6/2014) Judge Mackie QC granted relief from sanctions following a failure to serve documents relating to serve documents relating to additional liabilities at the outset of a detailed costs assessment. The case was briefly…
RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS GRANTED AFTER LATE SERVICE OF WITNESS SUMMARY: HIGH COURT CASE CONSIDERED
Whilst the Court of Appeal ruminates over the problems caused by Mitchell life goes on at the procedural coalface. Attached to this post is a decision of Mr. N. Strauss Q.C. sitting as a Deputy High Court Judge on the…
SANCTIONS CASE TODAY: SUBMISSIONS AND DISCUSSIONS FROM THE LAW SOCIETY AND BAR COUNCIL
The Bar Council and the Law Society were invited to make submissions at the sanctions hearings in the Court of Appeal today. The discussions between the Bar and the Bench make fascinating reading. (Mr Holland QC for both the Bar…
SANCTIONS HEARING TODAY: NOTES OF THE HEARING IN DECADENT VAPOURS
DECADENT VAPOURS LIMITED V BEVAN Heard by the Court of Appeal on 16th June 2014 (Lord Justice Dyson MR) (Lord Justice Jackson) (Lord Justice Vos) APPELLANT/CLAIMANT’S SUBMISSION In the present case the appellant appeals a decision to refuse relief from…
COURT OF APPEAL HEARING TODAY: DETAILED NOTE OF SUBMISSIONS AND DISCUSSIONS AT THE COURT
The Court of Appeal hearing on sanctions after Mitchell goes on. Here I outline, in detail, the submissions and discussions in Denton. Other cases will follow. DENTON AND OTHERS V T H WHITE LIMITED Heard by the Court of…
SANCTIONS CASES: SUMMARY OF ARGUMENTS THIS MORNING
Here is a very brief summary of the arguments considered by the Court of Appeal in the cases on sanctions this morning. A useful summary is also being provided by @JohnHyde1982 on twitter. Lord Justices Jackson, Dyson and Voss are…
PORTAL ISSUES: WHAT HAPPENS IF THE DEFENDANT DOESN'T PAY THE COSTS?
It is clear that a new jurisprudence is developing around behaviour in, or around, the portal. A previous post looked at how the court will construe procedural issues arising out of the portal. I am grateful to Tom Melville of…
COSTS DRAFTSMAN SIGNING COSTS BUDGET DOES NOT RENDER IT A NULLITY: HIGH COURT DECISION TODAY CONSIDERED
There may be no end to the Mitchell points being taken. In a case earlier today, Americhem Europe Ltd -v- Rakem Ltd [2014] EWHC 1881 (TCC) e Mr Justice Stuart-Smith considered an argument that the costs budget signed by a…
YET MORE ON SETTING ASIDE DEFAULT JUDGMENT, DELAY & PROMPTNESS
The case of Page -v- Champion Financial Ltd [2014] EWHC 1778 (QB) was discussed in an earlier post in relation to delays in applying to set judgment aside. The case of Dalton -v- Cooper [2014] EWHC 1556 (QB) was decided earlier, by…
EXPERT EVIDENCE: THE EXPERT’S ROLE: SEEING THE WOOD FOR THE TREES
A recent post dealt with the cross-examination of expert witnesses. It is interesting, in some cases, to look at how judged view expert evidence in practice. A good example arises in the judgment of Mr Justice Coulson in Stagecoach Great…
SETTING JUDGMENT ASIDE: DELAY & PROMPTNESS
When setting aside a default judgment the court has to consider whether the application was made “promptly”. The relevance and importance of a “prompt” application has been considered several times on this blog. The issue was considered again in Page…
FAILURE TO SERVE FORM N251: ADDITIONAL LIABILITIES & PREMIUM DISALLOWED; RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS REFUSED
We are seeing reports come through of cases that were decided some time ago. However they provide illustrations of the problems that can arise and the court’s likely approach. Ibbertson -v- Black Horse Ltd [Maidstone County Court] is available on…
PAY COURT FEES ON TIME AND DON'T RELY ON COURT STAFF FOR LEGAL ADVICE: ANOTHER REPORTED CASE WHERE RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS REFUSED:
The case of Decadent Vapours Ltd -v- Bevan et al (Judge Jarman Q.C. Cardiff District Registry, 18th February 2014) was reported on Lawtel this morning. It provides another warning of the dangers involved in not complying with court orders on…
CROSS-EXAMINING EXPERT WITNESSES: HINTS, TIPS AND LINKS
The impartiality, or otherwise, of expert witness witnesses is in the news today. This would seem an appropriate time to look at the cross-examination of expert witnesses, particularly in the context of civil litigation. THE ROLE OF THE EXPERT IN…
WHO IS WATCHING YOUR BACK? A CHECKLIST ON "DEFENSIVE LITIGATION"
The previous post looked at the “fish file” checklist prepared by groups in a recent session I conducted in at one of Kerry Underwood’s courses. A second checklist was also prepared by the groups and this related to “defensive litigation”….
OTHER ESSENTIAL CHECKLISTS: DEALING WITH THOSE "FISH FILES"
Earlier posts looked at the essential checklists prepared by delegates at the “how to get sued” conference. Missing from those checklists was any discussion of one real problem for practitioners that can often lead to problems – the “fish file”….
WHEN CAN YOU SERVE WITNESS SUMMARIES? A HIGH COURT CASE ON THE QUESTION OF WHETHER A PARTY IS "UNABLE" TO OBTAIN A WITNESS STATEMENT
The case of Scarlett -v- Grace (4/6/2014) QBD Phillips J was reported briefly on Lawtel yesterday. It provides an example of the difficulties when a party proposes to serve witness summaries rather than witness statements. THE RULES: CPR 32.9 CPR…
PROVING SOMETHING HAS BEEN POSTED: SWEAR IT TO BE TRUE
I initially read the Court of Appeal decision of Price -v- Price [2014[ EWCA] Civ with interest because it showed that the old CPR 3.9 still applied in family proceedings. However Jon Williams pointed out that the case has an…
73rd AMENDMENT TO THE CIVIL PROCEDURE RULES COMES INTO FORCE TODAY: FINAL TRIO OF LINKS
Monmouthshire Law Society’s twitter account announced Happy 73rd update to CPR day this morning. Here are three crucial links so you can join in the celebrations. CELEBRATORY LINKS A general summary and the rules themselves are here Guidance as to…
YOU CAN AGREE TO EXTEND TIME NOW: BUT SHOULD YOU AGREE TO EXTENSIONS?
Parties can agree to extend time from the 5th June. I have already written on the dangers of the system. However, if the dangers can be sidestepped, should a litigator agree to extend time. THE HEATED DEBATE: SHOULD PARTIES AGREE EXTENSIONS? This…
"ESSENTIAL CHECKLISTS": THE COMPLETE LIST
The “Essential Checklist” series developed out of a workshop series in a course I gave last month. Six groups produced six checklists. Here is a link to them all. SERVICE OF PROCEEDINGS: (“SERVICE WITH A SMILE”) Essential points before the…
AVOIDING UNDERSETTLEMENT: THE FINAL "ESSENTIAL CHECKLIST" & A USEFUL LINK
The final list in the “essential checklist” series is on “avoiding undersettlement”. The day the course was held the Law Society Gazette had published Rachel Rothwell’s piece on Why Cannibalism is coming to PI. One delegate noted that he had…
PRE-ACTION CONDUCT: ESSENTIAL CHECKLISTS AND USEFUL LINKS
This is the 5th in the series of “Essential Checklists”. The group “Prequel” (the clue is in the name I guess) set out what they thought were essential elements in Pre-action procedure. PREQUEL’S CHECKLIST PRE-ACTION STEPS, PROTOCOL AND LETTERS BEFORE…
COURT OF APPEAL TO HEAR THREE MORE CASES ON RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS
The Court of Appeal is to hear three cases on sanctions on the 16th & 17th June. One of the cases being considered is Utilise -v- Davies [2014] EWHC 834 (Ch) which was considered in an earlier post on this blog. The…
COSTS, COSTS BUDGETING AND MAKING A LIVING: THE PREQUEL TO THE ESSENTIAL CHECKLIST
The fourth in our “essential checklist” series was prepared by a group that called itself “Group H”. The checklist addresses issues relating to recording and recovering costs. GROUP H This was the only group where I was involved in some…
LATE SERVICE OF THE CLAIM FORM, RETROSPECTIVE EXTENSIONS AND OTHER CAUSES OF SLEEPLESS NIGHTS: A CASE TO POINT.
The recent case of Kaki –v- National Private Air Transport & National Air Service Ltd (QBD (Comm) 23/5/2014 raises some interesting issues in relation to the retrospective validation of service of a claim form when that claim form was served…
SURVIVING MITCHELL 20: THE GREAT BIG OVERALL CHECKLIST
I suspect that this series could go on indefinitely. It is drawn to a close with a round up of the key points. KEY POINTS 1. Know what happened in Mitchell and how it could have been avoided. 2. Assume…
SURVIVING MITCHELL 19: PRACTICE "DEFENSIVE LITIGATION" OR DON'T PRACTICE AT ALL
This is the 19th (and penultimate) in this series on “surviving Mitchell”. What the Mitchell case makes clear is that there is now precious little room for error in civil procedure. We have to develop systems of “defensive litigation”. That…
“MITCHELL BITES TO PENALISE LITIGANTS WHO FAIL TO COMPLY”: EXTENSIONS OF TIME, APPEALS AND BAHO.
The case of Baho & Ors –v- Meerza [2014] EWCA Civ 669 is a further example of a litigant coming to grief because they failed to file an application in time and make the application for an extension of time…
PROMPTNESS AND APPLICATIONS TO SET ASIDE JUDGMENT : THE BIG YELLOW VAN –V- RAYNER 27/05/2014 CONSIDERED
PROMPTNESS AND APPLICATIONS TO SET ASIDE JUDGMENT : THE BIG YELLOW VAN –V- RAYNER (2014) IPEC (Judge Hacon) 27/05/2014 CONSIDERED The importance of a prompt response to procedural issues and setting aside default judgment has been explored previously on this…
WITNESS STATEMENTS: NOT ONE BUT TWO "ESSENTIAL CHECKLISTS"
Earlier posts have documented how these checklists were made. The prequel to the essential checklist sets out matters that practitioners have to watch. Here I set out the checklist prepared by the group “Stating the Obvious”. It is no…
WITNESS STATEMENTS: THE PREQUEL TO THE "ESSENTIAL CHECKLIST"
As part of the “Essential Checklist” series a group considered the issues relating to witness statements. Prior to the checklist it is worth reviewing some of the essential issues relating to the service and preparation of witness statements. THE ISSUES…
“FAILING TO SEE THE WOOD FOR THE TREES” AND LATE APPLICATIONS TO AMEND PLEADINGS : GROARKE –V- FONTAINE CONSIDERED
Groarke –v- Fontaine [2014] EWHC 1679 (QB) centred on a Road Traffic Accident that happened in November 2009. The central issue on appeal was whether a late application to amend the defence to plead contributory negligence should have been allowed….
SERVICE OF PROCEEDINGS: ADDING TO THE "ESSENTIAL CHECKLIST"
One advantage of twitter is that it is instantaneous. Tweeters today commented on the new practice at Salford of only sending one copy of the sealed claim form back for solicitor service. This is something that can usefully be added…
SERVICE BY E-MAIL: SETTING ASIDE JUDGMENTS AFTER MITCHELL AND MUCH MORE: BRETT –V- COLCHESTER HOSPITAL UNIVERSITY CONSIDERED
There is a considerable amount of interest in the judgment of Master O’Hare in this case. Firstly was service by e-mail good service when a party had not complied with the Practice Direction on service by electric means? Secondly what…
A DELIBERATE DECISION NOT TO FILE A WITNESS STATEMENT AND YET RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS GRANTED: MONDE PETROLEUM SA-V- WESTERNAZAGROS LTD CONSIDERED
In Monde Petroleum SA –v- Westernzagros Ltd (2014) QBD (Comm) (Hamblen J) 19/05/2014 a party intentionally failed to file a witness statement on time, yet relief from sanctions was granted. (The following is based on the Lawtel summary) THE FACTS…
CPR 3.9: MITCHELL AND APPLYING TO JOIN GROUP LITIGATION: HOLLOWAY -v- TRANSFORM MEDICAL GROUP
In Holloway -v- Transport Medical Group [2014] EWHC 1641 (QB) Mrs Justice Thirlwall DBE considered whether the “Mitchell” principles applied to late applications to join the register of claims following a Group Litigation Order. THE JUDGMENT The judgment is available…
SETTING ASIDE A DEFAULT JUDGMENT AFTER MITCHELL: WHAT IS THE APPROPRIATE TEST?
There has been much discussion of whether the Mitchell principles impact upon an application have a default judgment set aside. There are some cases that indicate that the amended CPR 3.9 should be taken into account in relation to a…
You must be logged in to post a comment.