AVOIDING PROBLEMS WITH EXPERT WITNESSES: WEBINAR 6th MARCH 2025: DEALS WITH SOME “INTERESTING” ISSUES: EXPERTS BEHAVING BADLY
This webinar deals, among other things, with three cases where solicitors have been struck off the Roll because of their conduct with expert witnesses. In one of those cases the solicitor also went to prison. The Court of Appeal held…
AVOIDING LIMITATION PROBLEMS AND MAKING AN EFFECTIVE SECTION 33 APPLICATION: WEBINAR 20th FEBRUARY 2025
Limitation issues feature regularly on this blog and are a major reason for litigators being sued. This webinar looks at the major problem areas in limitation for personal injury and clinical negligence litigators. It identifies, and helps litigators avoid, all…
EXTRAORDINARY CONDUCT WHICH LED TO SOLICITOR’S UNLAWFUL DEDUCTION FROM A PROTECT PARTY’S DAMAGES: JUDGMENT FROM THE SCCO
In AKS v National Farmers Union Mutual Insurance Society Ltd [2025] EWHC 126 (SCCO) Costs Judge Leonard recounted an extraordinary set of facts where a solicitor had wrongly deducted sums from their client’s damages. The judgment shows that this issue…
THE COSTS JUDGE OVER YOUR SHOULDER: MAXIMISING COSTS RECOVERY ON AN INTER PARTIES RECOVER – THE LITIGATOR’S ROLE: WEBINAR 23rd JANUARY 2025
Detailed assessment usually takes place after attempts at settlement of costs have failed and there are some major differences between the parties. The webinar uses examples from reported cases to show where failures and omissions by the receiving party has…
“CUT AND PASTE” PARAGRAPHS UNDERMINE THE COGENCY OF THE EVIDENCE IN WITNESS STATEMENTS
We are returning to the judgment of HHJ Kelly (sitting as a High Court Judge) in MJF v University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust [2024] EWHC 3156 (KB). This time we are looking at the judge’s observations about the preparation…
“STATEMENTS OF CASE PLAY AN ESSENTIAL ROLE IN CIVIL LITIGATION”: THE DEFENDANT WAS NOT ALLOWED TO RUN A CASE ON CAUSATION THAT IT HAD NOT PLEADED: CLINICAL NEGLIGENCE CASE CONSIDERED
In MJF v University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust [2024] EWHC 3156 (KB) HHJ Emma Kelly (sitting as a High Court Judge) found that the defendant in a clinical negligence trial was trying to run a case on causation that…
68 YEARS AND STILL ROLLING OFF THE PRESS: THE 15TH EDITION OF MUNKMAN (& EXALL) ON DAMAGES:A LOOK AT THE PAST EDITIONS AND WHAT WE CAN LEARN
The latest edition of what, used to be called, Munkman on Damages is now hot off the press. This is the 15th edition, the first being written in 1956. Now called Munkman and Exall on Damages for Personal Injury and…
CHANGE IN THE DISCOUNT RATE FROM THE 11th JANUARY 2025: THE STATUTORY INSTRUMENT IS OUT…
The Damages (Personal Injury) (England and Wales) Order 2024 changes the discount rate from the 11th January 2025 so that the prescribed rate of return is 0.5%. This may lead to some schedules (and counter-schedules) needing to be re-visited and…
CLAIMANT’S APPLICATION FOR AN ANONYMITY ORDER REFUSED: THE APPLICATION WAS TOO LATE: IMPORTANT ISSUES CONSIDERED BY THE HIGH COURT
I am grateful to barrister Leslie Keegan for sending me a copy of the judgment of Mr Justice Nicklin in PMC -v- A Local Health Board [2024] EWHC 2969 (KB). It deals with important issues relating to the making of…
DEFENDANT COULD NOT PLEAD MATTERS THAT WERE INCONSISTENT WITH THE JUDGMENT: QUITE A TALE HERE…
In Tait v Torbay and South Devon NHS Foundation Trust [2024] EWHC 2958 (KB) Master Sullivan considered whether the defendant’s defence was inconsistent with the matters set out in a detailed judgment that had been entered on liability and causation. …
DEFENDANT FAILS TO ESTABLISH A WHOLE HOST OF ALLEGATIONS OF FUNDAMENTAL DISHONESTY:
In Cullen v Henniker-Major [2024] EWHC 2809 (KB) HHJ Ambrose (sitting as a Judge of the High Court) rejected the numerous allegations of fundamental dishonesty made by the defendant against the claimant. The case may be an object lesson in…
LOSS OF EARNINGS CLAIMS: THE FUNDAMENTALS: WEBINAR 11th NOVEMBER 2024
We have seen some interesting cases on loss of earnings claims this year, with a claimant being found fundamentally dishonest, because of the way the claim for loss earnings was presented, an “unreliable” schedule leading to a claim for loss…
WHEN THE CLAIMANT HAS TO CHANGE JOBS, EARNS MORE THAN BEFORE – BUT THERE IS A SUBSTANTIAL AWARD FOR LOSS OF EARNINGS: THE VERY REAL VALUE OF “FRINGE BENEFITS”
A webinar on the 5th November looks at loss of earnings from the point of view of loss of benefits and pension claims. It is important that the very real value of “fringe” benefits is not overlooked when looking at…
PERSONAL INJURY DAMAGES: COURT OF PROTECTION RELEASES CLAIMANT FROM “PETERS” UNDERTAKING
I am grateful to my colleagues Sam Karim KC and Fay Collinson for pointing out the decision of BJB, In the Matter Of [2024] EWCOP 59 (T2). In that case HHJ Hilder granted the claimant’s application that she be released…
PROVING THINGS 247: APPLYING A DIFFERENT MULTIPLIER TO THE RESIDUAL EARNING CAPACITY OF A DISABLED CLAIMANT
It is worthwhile highlighting one aspect of the judgment of Neil Moody KC (sitting as a High Court judge) in Winterbotham v Shahrak [2024] EWHC 2633 (KB), looked at in the previous post. The judge applied different multipliers to the claim. A…
PROVING THINGS 246: THE SELF EMPLOYED CLAIMANT AND LOSS OF EARNINGS: HIGH COURT DECISION
There are many difficult issues facing a self-employed claimant making a claim for loss of earnings. This issue was considered by Neil Moody KC (sitting as a High Court judge) in Winterbotham v Shahrak [2024] EWHC 2633 (KB). …
INTEREST RATE REDUCTION ON THE COURTS FUND OFFICE SPECIAL AND BASIC ACCOUNTS: IMPORTANT NEWS FOR PERSONAL INJURY AND CLINICAL NEGLIGENCE PRACTITIONERS
The Courts Funds Office has reduced the rates of interest payable from the 19th September 2024. In the announcement that can be found here the rates on the special account and basic account are decreased. Special Account – decreased…
CONSIDERING THE IMPACT OF INFLATION WHEN LOOKING AT THE JUDICIAL COLLEGE GUIDELINES: A CASE TO POINT
It has been established for some time that the figures in the Judicial College Guidelines for the Assessment of Personal Injury Damages are themselves subject to indexation for inflation. The most recent Guidelines (the 17th) are based on the RPI…
THE DIFFICULT ISSUE OF THE CHILD CLAIMANT AND LOSS OF EARNINGS CLAIMS: WEBINAR 14th OCTOBER 2024
For many years now I have been researching and writing about the particular problems that face practitioners when they are dealing with a claim by a child who could suffer loss of earnings in the future as a result of…
AN IDEAL CHRISTMAS PRESENT FOR THE LITIGATORS IN YOUR LIFE: MUNKMAN & EXALL ON DAMAGES: 15th EDITION
The latest edition of Munkman and Exall on damages in being published in November this year, obviously it has been cleverly timed to catch the important Christmas market. Details of how to buy the multiple copies you will undoubtedly need…
PROVING THINGS 244: WHERE THERE IS A “GENUINE DIFFERENCE OF OPINION” BETWEEN EXPERTS : CLAIMANT FAILS TO ESTABLISH LIABILITY IN A CLINICAL NEGLIGENCE CASE
Many of the cases on this blog that consider experts feature judicial criticism of those experts. Sometimes because of a failure to take into account the duties owed by those experts. However litigation is more complicated than that. It is…
AN “UNRELIABLE” SCHEDULE LEADS TO A CLAIM FOR LOSS OF EARNINGS BEING STRUCK OUT (AND FOUR WEBINARS ON LOSS OF EARNINGS)
The way in which a claim for loss of earnings claim is presented is of crucial importance in most claims for damages. There are a series of four seminars below where many of the essential elements are considered. A case…
COST BITES 180: EXCESSIVE BUDGET LEADS TO PARTY BEING ORDERED TO PAY THE COSTS OF A BUDGETING HEARING
In Nicholas Worcester v Dr Philip Hopley [2024] EWHC 2181 (KB) Master Thornett awarded costs against a party who, the Master felt, had over-inflated their costs budget. The case stands as a warning that a party putting forward a budget which is…
CLINICAL NEGLIGENCE, EVIDENCE AND DISCLOSURE: WHEN THE JUDGE FINDS THAT THE MEDICAL NOTES ARE NOT ACCURATE: “A CONTRIVED AND FALSE PIECE OF EVIDENCE”
In Biggadike v El Farra & Anor [2024] EWHC 1688 (KB) HHJ Carmel Wall (sitting as a High Court Judge) found that annotations made to medical records were not, in fact, contemporaneous. She rejected the second defendant’s evidence based on…
WHEN THE JUDGE PREFERS ONE EXPERT WITNESS OVER ANOTHER: A CLINICAL NEGLIGENCE EXAMPLE
In Woods v Doncaster And Bassetlaw Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2024] EWHC 1432 (KB) Mrs Justice Lambert preferred the claimant’s expert evidence to that that of the defendant. This was not because either expert was unduly partisan. Rather it…
FUNDAMENTAL DISHONESTY COST CLAIMANT £325,000 IN DEFENCE COSTS EVEN AFTER THE CLAIM HAD BEEN DISCONTINUED
I am grateful to Louise Jackson from Clyde & Co for drawing my attention to her piece about a recent settlement in a case where fundamental dishonesty was alleged. This is not a case that got to trial. However it…
AVOIDING UNDERSETTLEMENT: A GUIDE FOR PERSONAL INJURY LAWYERS: WEBINAR 4th JUNE 2024
This webinar looks at those cases where allegations of under settlement have been made against claimant solicitors, looking at the factors that lead to a court finding whether there was negligence when a case was settled or litigated. Booking details…
COURT ORDERS DISCLOSURE AGAINST HEALTHCARE SAFETY INVESTIGATION BOARD
In Turner & Anor Sheffield Teaching Hospital NHS Foundation Trust & Anor [2023] EWHC 3452 (KB) Master Brown allowed an application by the claimant for disclosure of statements made to the Healthcare Investigation Board. “A trial judge faced with deciding…
CHANGES TO THE FIXED COSTS RULE 1: WHEN CLINICAL NEGLIGENCE CLAIMS MUST BE ALLOCATED TO THE MULTI TRACK
There are a number of significant changes taking place to the fixed costs rules, coming into force on the 6th April 2024. These are introduced by The Civil Procedure (Amendment) Rules 2024. Here we look at the change to the…
DAMAGES FOR PSYCHIATRIC INJURY AFTER SEEING A DEATH : SOME IMPORTANT POINTS CLARIFIED BY THE SUPREME COURT
The judgment of the Supreme Court in Paul & Anor v Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust [2024] UKSC 1 will be the subject of detailed scrutiny by practitioners and academics for years to come. It is an action where the claimants…
DRAFTING WITNESS STATEMENTS: WHEN THE CLAIMANT’S STATEMENT IS SIMPLY A REHASH OF THE PARTICULARS OF CLAIM
I am grateful to barrister Nadia Whittaker for sending me a copy of the judgment of Recorder Sheehan KC in the case of Ball -v- The Wolverhampton NHS Trust. It is a working example of the difficulties that flow when…
WEBINAR ON CLINICAL NEGLIGENCE COSTS: KING CHAMBERS EVENT: 7th DECEMBER 2023
My colleagues Andrew Hogan and Kevin Latham are presenting a webinar on Clinical Negligence Costs on the 7th December 2023. Booking details are available here. THE WEBINAR In this timely seminar, Andrew Hogan and Kevin Latham will consider current issues in clinical negligence costs…
SECTION 33 APPLICATION IN CLINICAL NEGLIGENCE CASE: THE SINS OF THE SOLICITORS WERE NOT VISITED UPON THE CLAIMANT: ACTION ALLOWED TO PROCEED WHEN IT WAS 5 1/2 YEARS OUT OF TIME
We looked at the judgment in Shaw v Maguire (Re Preliminary Issues) [2023] EWHC 2155 (KB) in an earlier post where Master Cook held that the court had a discretion under Section 33 of the Limitation Act 1980 in a fatal…
MAJOR PROBLEMS WHEN THE JUDGE IS “NOT IMPRESSED” BY THE SCHEDULES OF LOSS: “MUCH TIME WAS THROWN AWAY ON CALCULATIONS BASED ON THE WRONG PREMISES”
We are returning to the judgment of Costs Judge James in HD v Northern Devon Healthcare NHS Trust [2023] EWHC 2118 (SCCO). This is a case that anyone drafting a Schedule of Damages should read. These actions were settled well before…
COST BITES 97: CLAIMANT NOT ALLOWED 62.3 HOURS TO DRAFT THE LETTER OF CLAIM: WHAT SHOULD LETTERS OF CLAIM CONTAIN?
In HD v Northern Devon Healthcare NHS Trust [2023] EWHC 2118 (SCCO) Costs Judge James considered the question of how much time should have been spent drafting a letter of claim in a clinical negligence case. She disallowed the 62…
CLINICAL NEGLIGENCE CASE WHERE CLAIMANT OFFERED TO ACCEPT 90% OF DAMAGES WAS A VALID PART 36 OFFER: IT WAS NOT UNJUST FOR THE DEFENDANT TO FACE THE CONSEQUENCES
In Chapman v Mid and South Essex NHS Foundation Trust (Re Costs) [2023] EWHC 1871 (KB) Mrs Justice Hill decided that a claimant’s offer to accept 90% of damages in a clinical negligence case, where there had been a trial…
PERMISSION GIVEN FOR “UPDATING” WITNESS STATEMENTS: PARTIES NEED TO CONSIDER DIRECTIONS FOR UP-TO-DATE FACTUAL EVIDENCE
The judgment of Mr Justice Ritchie in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2023] EWHC 1770 (KB) is an example of how consideration needs to be given to “updated” witness statements in a case where there situation is…
CLINICAL NEGLIGENCE, CONTRIBUTORY NEGLIGENCE AND PART 36: A USEFUL NOTE OF JUDGMENT
I am grateful to solicitor Bethan Parry from Browne Jacobson for sending me a note of the decision of HHJ Khan in Rix -v- Wall, the details of which are set out below. The note is interesting in that it…
YOU’VE INSTRUCTED THE WRONG EXPERT: AND THIS HAS MAJOR CONSEQUENCES
We are returning to the judgment of Mr Justice Ritchie in GKE v Gunning [2023] EWHC 332 (KB). This time to look at the judge’s observations on the claimant’s expert on liability. The judge observed that the claimant had instructed the…
SETTING ASIDE A DEFAULT JUDGMENT: HAVE COGENT EVIDENCE (AND A DRAFT DEFENCE) TO HAND: DEFENDANT’S DELAY ALONE WOULD HAVE LED TO APPLICATION BEING REFUSED IN A CLINICAL NEGLIGENCE CASE
I am grateful to Barrister Leslie Keegan for their note of the judgment of Master Cook in Buckingham -v- Elneil (15th July 2022)*. The Master refused the defendant’s application to set aside a default judgment. The defendant did not have…
PROVING THINGS 233: ASSESSING EVIDENCE AFTER 14 YEARS: THE CRUEL CONCEPT OF CAUSATION IN MEDICAL NEGLIGENCE
This blog has looked many times at issues relating to witness evidence and the judicial approach when hearing evidence of matters that happened a considerable time before trial. The difficulties are made clear in the judgment of HHJ Emma Kelly…
RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS: NOT ALL BAD REASONS FOR DEFAULT ARE EQUALLY BAD: A PARTY CANNOT ASSERT PREJUDICE BY BEING SILENT
In EXN v East Lancashire Hospitals NHS Trust & Anor [2022] EWHC 872 (QB) Mr Justice Turner allowed an appeal where a District Judge had refused to grant relief from sanctions. The judgment is particularly interesting in that it notes…
DEFENDANTS HAVE TO PAY COSTS OF ATE PREMIUM: DEEMED ORDER FOR COSTS FOLLOWING ACCEPTANCE OF PART 36 OFFER INCLUDES THE COSTS THE ATE PREMIUM
In Dance v East Kent University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust & Ors [2022] EWHC B9 (Costs) Costs Judge Leonard considered two ingenious arguments where the defendants attempted to avoid paying the claimant’s ATE premium. This involved consideration of the deemed…
WITNESS EVIDENCE IN CLINICAL NEGLIGENCE CASES: WEBINAR 22nd MARCH 2022
Over the past few months this blog has covered several cases where clinical negligence cases have been determined, ultimately, on the accuracy of witness recollection. For example the judgment of Mr Justice Ritchie in Watson v Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS…
WITNESS EVIDENCE IN CLINICAL NEGLIGENCE CASES: CRUCIAL FACTUAL FINDINGS MADE IN FAVOUR OF THE DEFENDANT
It is surprising how many clinical negligence cases rest, ultimately, on findings of fact as to what was said. An example can be seen in the judgment of Mr Justice Ritchie in Watson v Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust…
WITNESS EVIDENCE, MEMORY AND CLINICAL NEGLIGENCE CASES: A DETAILED CONSIDERATION OF THE PRINCIPLES
We looked yesterday at the judgment of HHJ Tindal in Freeman -v- Pennine Acute Hospitals NHS Trust, a copy of which is available here. Freeman v Pennine NHS Judgment 03.12.21(without password) (1) The major part of that judgment contains a detailed…
WITNESS EVIDENCE AND CLINICAL NEGLIGENCE: THE COURT CONSIDERS WHAT WAS SAID – 17 YEARS AFTER THE EVENT
In HTR v Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust [2021] EWHC 3228 (QB) Mr Justice Cotter considered the issue of the reliability of witness evidence when the events being considered occurred 17 years previously. It is an example of the kind…
SURVEILLANCE EVIDENCE IN PERSONAL INJURY CASES: WEBINAR 4th NOVEMBER 2021
On the 4th November I am giving a webinar on surveillance evidence. Booking details are available here. This webinar deals with practice and procedure in relation to the production of surveillance evidence in personal injury cases and looks at: The…
LIMITATION, THE DATE OF KNOWLEDGE AND THE SECTION 33 DISCRETION: THE SINS OF THE LAWYER CANNOT NECESSARILY BE PASSED ONTO THE CLIENT
The judgment of Richard Hermer QC, sitting as a High Court Judge, in Wilkins v University Hospital North Midlands NHS Trust [2021] EWHC 2164 (QB) deals with several important elements of limitation in the context of clinical negligence. Firstly the…
DEFENDANT NOT LIABLE TO PAY THE COSTS OF DISPUTES OVER WHO SHOULD BE CLAIMANT’S LITIGATION FRIEND
In HR v Aneurin Bevan University Local Health Board [2021] EWHC 2195 (Admin) Mrs Justice Foster rejected an argument that the defendant should be liable to pay the costs incurred when there was a dispute in relation to the identity…
You must be logged in to post a comment.