POST DENTON RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS APPEAL IN THE HIGH COURT: RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS GRANTED: "UNREASONABLE" DEFENDANT ORDERED TO PAY COSTS
I am grateful to Ashley Pratt of St James Chambers for his note of the decision of Mr Justice King in Johnson -v- Bourne Leisure on the 21st July 2014. King J granted relief from sanctions and allowed an appeal from the…
CASE MANAGEMENT AFTER DENTON: DIRECTIONS AND COURT ORDERS SHOULD BE "REALISTIC AND ACHIEVABLE"
Most of the articles about the Denton case focus upon the relief from sanctions and “clarification” of the principles in Mitchell. However the Court of Appeal made it clear that part of the focus of case management should be to…
DENTON: THE DISSENTING JUDGMENT OF JACKSON L.J. CONSIDERED
In the hundreds of articles, blogs and commentaries on the decision in Denton the “dissenting” judgment is barely mentioned or considered. Whilst all three members of the court were in agreement that each of the appeals should be allowed there…
WHAT IS MEANT BY "SERIOUS AND SIGNIFICANT"? THE COURT CONCENTRATES MUCH MORE UPON THE EFFECT OF THE BREACH RATHER THAN THE BREACH ITSELF
In Denton -v- White; [2014] EWCA Civ 906. the Court of Appeal eschewed the use of the word “trivial” where a court is considering an application for relief from sanctions. Instead the Court stated that the focus should be on whether…
MITCHELL NOT EXTENDED TO ADMINISTRATIVE LAW: AN ISSUE FOR ANOTHER DAY
In R (Abbas Mohammadi -v- Secretary of State for the Home Department [2014] EWHC 2251 (Admin)the court did not decide the issue of whether “Mitchell” principles applied to applications for judicial review. THE FACTS The applicant was seeking judicial review of…
MORE ABOUT APPEALING MITCHELL DECISIONS OUT OF TIME: RELEVANT CASE LAW
A post yesterday considered the possibility of appealing, out of time, the unjust orders that may have been made following Mitchell and the subsequent “clarification” in Denton. There is some law on this topic, ironically it is a result of…
"HISTORIC" SANCTIONS DECISIONS: ARE YOU GOING TO APPLY TO APPEAL OUT OF TIME
In Denton -v- White [2014] EWCA Civ 906. the Court of Appeal stated that we think that the judgment in Mitchell has been misunderstood and is being misapplied by some courts. It is clear that it needs to be clarified and amplified in…
DENTON, RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS AND THE "LITIGATOR'S DILEMMA": LIFE IS NOW DANGEROUS FOR RESPONDENTS
I have written before about the “litigator’s dilemma” in relation to whether a point should be taken in relation to a breach, or an application for relief of sanctions opposed. The Denton decision makes this issue far more difficult for…
ANATOMY OF A POST-DENTON APPLICATION FOR RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS 4: COSTS, INDEMNITY COSTS & EVERYBODY IS AT RISK AS TO COSTS
In the fourth in the series of articles we look at the very heavy incentive the Court of Appeal imposed upon litigants (and litigators) not to object to applications for relief from sanctions in “all but the most serious cases”….
ANATOMY OF A POST-DENTON APPLICATION FOR RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS 3: THE "THIRD STAGE": EVERYTHING IS IN THE MIX
Having considered whether the breach is serious or significant and the reason for the breach a judge hearing a relief from sanctions application may have to go on to the “third stage”. Here the court considers all aspects of the…
ANATOMY OF A POST-DENTON RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS APPLICATION 2: THE REASON MAY NOT BE GOOD ENOUGH BUT THIS DOES NOT PREVENT RELIEF BEING GRANTED
The first stage of an application for relief from sanctions has been considered in an earlier post. If the breach is neither serious or significant then the court need not spend too much time on the second and third stages….
ANATOMY OF A POST-DENTON RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS APPLICATION 1: THE DEATH OF THE WORD "TRIVIAL"
There are now plenty of places that summarise and give views on the effect of the Court of Appeal decision in Denton -v- White. Here I want to start on the task of looking, in some detail, at the practical…
COURT OF APPEAL SANCTIONS HEARING: 70 KEY POINTS OF THE JUDGMENT
The 70 key points of the Court of Appeal judgment in Denton -v- White [2014] EWCA Civ 906. “We hope that what follows will avoid the need in future to resort to the earlier authorities.” (Paragraph 24). CRITICISM OF MITCHELL 1. The…
SANCTIONS HEARING 6: USEFUL LINKS AND WATCH THE JUDGMENT
These are links to commentary and comment on the Court of Appeal decision in Denton -v- White [2014] EWCA Civ 906. 1. The Law Society Gazette reviews the decision (and also allows you to see the judgment being given).(Also a…
SANCTIONS HEARING 4: DOES DECADENT VAPOURS LEAVE A PLEASANT SMELL?
The second substantive decision was Decadent Vapours. Here the Court of Appeal overturned a refusal to grant relief from sanctions and the claimant’s case was allowed to proceed. THE FACTS The claimant failed to make payments of fees by the…
SANCTIONS JUDGMENT: THE KEY POINTS (1): STAGES 1 AND 2 OF CONSIDERATIONS IN RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS APPLICATIONS
The history and arguments in relation to the Court of Appeal hearings on sanctions have been fully recorded on this blog. In the judgment given today there are a number of Key points. MITCHELL HAS BEEN THE SUBJECT OF CRITICISM…
COURT OF APPEAL HEARING ON SANCTIONS TODAY: BREAKING NEWS AND LINK TO JUDGMENT
The Court of Appeal have allowed all three appeals in the sanctions cases that were before them. This is breaking news (as I write the judgment is still being given). In Decadent Vapours the action had been struck out…
DATE SET FOR JUDGMENTS ON COURT OF APPEAL SANCTIONS HEARINGS
Judgment in the three recent cases where the Court of Appeal reviewed the application of the Mitchell criteria is to be given in in Court 71 in the Royal Courts of Justice on Friday 4th July at 2pm. TO SEE THE ARGUMENTS…
WITNESS STATEMENTS ARE FOR FACTS: KNOWING THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN EVIDENCE AND SUBMISSIONS (AND WHY IT MATTERS)
The recent Leeds Law Society Civil Litigation event reminded me of a similar meeting with judges over 25 years ago. The Registrars (District Judges) gave a talk to local articled clerks (trainee solicitors). There was a basic message delivered in…
WITNESS STATEMENTS CANNOT BE RELIED ON AT TRIAL IF SERVED LATE AND RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS NOT GIVEN
Lawtel today reported the case of Davies -v- Liberty Place [2014] EWHC 2034 (Admin). In that case Leggatt J stated that a party who served a witness statement late was not automatically precluded from relying on that statement at trial….
NO RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS AFTER APPELLANT FAILED TO FILE TRANSCRIPTS ON TIME.
In Patterson -v- Spencer [2014] EWHC 1878 (Ch) Henry Carr QC (sitting as a High Court Judge) refused an appellant’s application for relief from sanctions after she failed to file transcripts of the initial hearing. THE FACTS One of the defendants,…
ANOTHER CASE WHERE PARTY REFUSED RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS FOLLOWING LATE SERVICE OF WITNESS STATEMENT
The case of Swinden -v- Grima (Nicol J) 18/06/2014 is briefly reported on Lawtel (20th June). It is another example of the court refusing permission to serve witness statements late. THE FACTS The defendant served a witness statement on the…
MORE ABOUT SETTING ASIDE JUDGMENT AND CPR 3.9: NEWLAND -v- TOBA CONSIDERED
The question of whether CPR 3.9 and the Mitchell criteria apply to applications to have judgment set aside is an issue that has been considered several times on this blog. In a decision yesterday Newland -v- Trading FZC (& other)…
RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS FOLLOWING LATE FAILURE TO SERVE WITNESS STATEMENT: ONE OUT OF THREE MAY NOT BE ENOUGH
In Cranford Community College -v- Cranford College Ltd (16/06/2014 IPEC Judge Hacon) the court granted relief from sanctions following late service of a witness statement. (The case was reported on Lawtel on the 18th June 2014). THE FACTS The action…
WELL WHAT SHOULD THE TEST FOR RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS BE? YOUR CHANCE TO COMMENT
“Is there not a more imaginative way to encourage parties to co-operate? Looking at some of the circumstances litigation had been utterly derailed due to satellite litigation. This is inappropriate in 99% of cases. We need a message saying that…
LEEDS LAW SOCIETY MEET THE JUDGES EVENT: JACKSON ONE YEAR (AND A FEW MONTHS) ON
Yesterday evening Leeds Law Society held a “meet the judges” evening when practitioners met local judges and court staff to discuss issues arising out of the implementation of the Jackson reforms. Some of the issues were specific to Leeds but most…
COURT OF APPEAL SANCTIONS HEARING: SUBMISSIONS IN UTILISE -V- DAVIES
The final tranche of the notes taking at the hearing of the sanctions cases yesterday. The case of Utilise -v- Davies. Discussion of the first instance decision can be found in this blog as can a link to the transcript….
RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS FOLLOWING FAILURE TO FILE FUNDING INFORMATION AT START OF COSTS ASSESSMENT: MERCANTILE COURT DECISION
In Warner -v- Merrett (QBD Merc 12/6/2014) Judge Mackie QC granted relief from sanctions following a failure to serve documents relating to serve documents relating to additional liabilities at the outset of a detailed costs assessment. The case was briefly…
RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS GRANTED AFTER LATE SERVICE OF WITNESS SUMMARY: HIGH COURT CASE CONSIDERED
Whilst the Court of Appeal ruminates over the problems caused by Mitchell life goes on at the procedural coalface. Attached to this post is a decision of Mr. N. Strauss Q.C. sitting as a Deputy High Court Judge on the…
SANCTIONS CASE TODAY: SUBMISSIONS AND DISCUSSIONS FROM THE LAW SOCIETY AND BAR COUNCIL
The Bar Council and the Law Society were invited to make submissions at the sanctions hearings in the Court of Appeal today. The discussions between the Bar and the Bench make fascinating reading. (Mr Holland QC for both the Bar…
SANCTIONS HEARING TODAY: NOTES OF THE HEARING IN DECADENT VAPOURS
DECADENT VAPOURS LIMITED V BEVAN Heard by the Court of Appeal on 16th June 2014 (Lord Justice Dyson MR) (Lord Justice Jackson) (Lord Justice Vos) APPELLANT/CLAIMANT’S SUBMISSION In the present case the appellant appeals a decision to refuse relief from…
SANCTIONS CASES: SUMMARY OF ARGUMENTS THIS MORNING
Here is a very brief summary of the arguments considered by the Court of Appeal in the cases on sanctions this morning. A useful summary is also being provided by @JohnHyde1982 on twitter. Lord Justices Jackson, Dyson and Voss are…
TWO DAYS LATE SERVICE OF NOTICE OF APPEAL IS A "TRIVIAL" ERROR: HIGH COURT DECISION CONSIDERED
In Harrogate Borough Council -v- Secretary of State for Communities & Local Government & Zammitt [2014] EWHC 1506 (Admin) the appellant was two days late in serving a notice of appeal. His Honour Judge Behrens (sitting as a judge of the…
COSTS DRAFTSMAN SIGNING COSTS BUDGET DOES NOT RENDER IT A NULLITY: HIGH COURT DECISION TODAY CONSIDERED
There may be no end to the Mitchell points being taken. In a case earlier today, Americhem Europe Ltd -v- Rakem Ltd [2014] EWHC 1881 (TCC) e Mr Justice Stuart-Smith considered an argument that the costs budget signed by a…
SETTING JUDGMENT ASIDE: DELAY & PROMPTNESS
When setting aside a default judgment the court has to consider whether the application was made “promptly”. The relevance and importance of a “prompt” application has been considered several times on this blog. The issue was considered again in Page…
FAILURE TO SERVE FORM N251: ADDITIONAL LIABILITIES & PREMIUM DISALLOWED; RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS REFUSED
We are seeing reports come through of cases that were decided some time ago. However they provide illustrations of the problems that can arise and the court’s likely approach. Ibbertson -v- Black Horse Ltd [Maidstone County Court] is available on…
PAY COURT FEES ON TIME AND DON'T RELY ON COURT STAFF FOR LEGAL ADVICE: ANOTHER REPORTED CASE WHERE RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS REFUSED:
The case of Decadent Vapours Ltd -v- Bevan et al (Judge Jarman Q.C. Cardiff District Registry, 18th February 2014) was reported on Lawtel this morning. It provides another warning of the dangers involved in not complying with court orders on…
WHO IS WATCHING YOUR BACK? A CHECKLIST ON "DEFENSIVE LITIGATION"
The previous post looked at the “fish file” checklist prepared by groups in a recent session I conducted in at one of Kerry Underwood’s courses. A second checklist was also prepared by the groups and this related to “defensive litigation”….
WHEN CAN YOU SERVE WITNESS SUMMARIES? A HIGH COURT CASE ON THE QUESTION OF WHETHER A PARTY IS "UNABLE" TO OBTAIN A WITNESS STATEMENT
The case of Scarlett -v- Grace (4/6/2014) QBD Phillips J was reported briefly on Lawtel yesterday. It provides an example of the difficulties when a party proposes to serve witness summaries rather than witness statements. THE RULES: CPR 32.9 CPR…
PROVING SOMETHING HAS BEEN POSTED: SWEAR IT TO BE TRUE
I initially read the Court of Appeal decision of Price -v- Price [2014[ EWCA] Civ with interest because it showed that the old CPR 3.9 still applied in family proceedings. However Jon Williams pointed out that the case has an…
73rd AMENDMENT TO THE CIVIL PROCEDURE RULES COMES INTO FORCE TODAY: FINAL TRIO OF LINKS
Monmouthshire Law Society’s twitter account announced Happy 73rd update to CPR day this morning. Here are three crucial links so you can join in the celebrations. CELEBRATORY LINKS A general summary and the rules themselves are here Guidance as to…
YOU CAN AGREE TO EXTEND TIME NOW: BUT SHOULD YOU AGREE TO EXTENSIONS?
Parties can agree to extend time from the 5th June. I have already written on the dangers of the system. However, if the dangers can be sidestepped, should a litigator agree to extend time. THE HEATED DEBATE: SHOULD PARTIES AGREE EXTENSIONS? This…
"ESSENTIAL CHECKLISTS": THE COMPLETE LIST
The “Essential Checklist” series developed out of a workshop series in a course I gave last month. Six groups produced six checklists. Here is a link to them all. SERVICE OF PROCEEDINGS: (“SERVICE WITH A SMILE”) Essential points before the…
AVOIDING UNDERSETTLEMENT: THE FINAL "ESSENTIAL CHECKLIST" & A USEFUL LINK
The final list in the “essential checklist” series is on “avoiding undersettlement”. The day the course was held the Law Society Gazette had published Rachel Rothwell’s piece on Why Cannibalism is coming to PI. One delegate noted that he had…
COURT OF APPEAL TO HEAR THREE MORE CASES ON RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS
The Court of Appeal is to hear three cases on sanctions on the 16th & 17th June. One of the cases being considered is Utilise -v- Davies [2014] EWHC 834 (Ch) which was considered in an earlier post on this blog. The…
SURVIVING MITCHELL 20: THE GREAT BIG OVERALL CHECKLIST
I suspect that this series could go on indefinitely. It is drawn to a close with a round up of the key points. KEY POINTS 1. Know what happened in Mitchell and how it could have been avoided. 2. Assume…
SURVIVING MITCHELL 19: PRACTICE "DEFENSIVE LITIGATION" OR DON'T PRACTICE AT ALL
This is the 19th (and penultimate) in this series on “surviving Mitchell”. What the Mitchell case makes clear is that there is now precious little room for error in civil procedure. We have to develop systems of “defensive litigation”. That…
“MITCHELL BITES TO PENALISE LITIGANTS WHO FAIL TO COMPLY”: EXTENSIONS OF TIME, APPEALS AND BAHO.
The case of Baho & Ors –v- Meerza [2014] EWCA Civ 669 is a further example of a litigant coming to grief because they failed to file an application in time and make the application for an extension of time…
PROMPTNESS AND APPLICATIONS TO SET ASIDE JUDGMENT : THE BIG YELLOW VAN –V- RAYNER 27/05/2014 CONSIDERED
PROMPTNESS AND APPLICATIONS TO SET ASIDE JUDGMENT : THE BIG YELLOW VAN –V- RAYNER (2014) IPEC (Judge Hacon) 27/05/2014 CONSIDERED The importance of a prompt response to procedural issues and setting aside default judgment has been explored previously on this…
You must be logged in to post a comment.