Civil Litigation Brief ®
Menu
  • Home
  • About
  • Membership Plans
  • Webinars
  • Login
Updates and Commentary on Civil Procedure, by Gordon Exall, Barrister, Kings Chambers
Browse: Home » Damages » Page 9
THANKS FOR THE £500,000. NOW WHERE’S THE EXTRA £50,000 YOU OWE ME?  KNOWING THE RISKS AND ADVANTAGES FOR THE CLAIMANT IN THE NEW PART 36

THANKS FOR THE £500,000. NOW WHERE’S THE EXTRA £50,000 YOU OWE ME? KNOWING THE RISKS AND ADVANTAGES FOR THE CLAIMANT IN THE NEW PART 36

June 27, 2013 · by gexall · in Avoiding negligence claims, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Part 36

The new provisions when a claimant beats their own Part 36 provide challenges (including potential negligence claims) for the claimant lawyer.  A claimant who beats their own Part 36 offer at trial now obtains considerable benefit.  CPR 36.13(3) states that…

← Previous 1 … 8 9

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email. Subscription notifies you of a new post, it does not give you access to members' content.

Join 12.3K other subscribers

Recent Posts

  • THE CURRENT IMPORTANCE OF PLEADINGS 102: THE CLAIMANTS FAILURE TO PLEAD A COUNTERFACTUAL PROPERLY MEANS THE PARTICULARS NEED SUBSTANTIAL AMENDMENT
  • WITNESS EVIDENCE WEDNESDAY: INTERMEDIARIES IN CIVIL PROCEEDINGS: DEFENDANT WITH ADHD ENTITLED TO ASSISTANCE WHEN GIVING EVIDENCE, BUT NOT THROUGHOUT THE TRIAL
  • WHAT IS TO BE DONE WITH LITIGANTS WHO CAN’T KEEP SECRETS (2): EMBARGOED JUDGMENTS: TEN KEY POINTS AND SUGGESTIONS FOR HOW A LETTER TO THE CLIENT SHOULD BE DRAFTED
  • ANOTHER CASE ON BREACH OF A JUDGMENT EMBARGO: WHAT IS TO BE DONE WITH LITIGANTS WHO CAN’T KEEP SECRETS (1)?
  • PROVING THINGS 302 : THE COURT DREW ADVERSE INFERENCES WHEN THE CLAIMANT FAILED TO TEST THE METER IT WAS RELYING ON

Top Posts

COST BITES 447: “THESE SUMS ARE ASTONISHING”: COURT OF APPEAL CONSIDERS £2 MILLION BRIEF FEE AND COSTS OF A FOUR-DAY APPEAL (AND IS NOT TOO IMPRESSED)
DID YOU KNOW THAT YOU COULD BE MADE BANKRUPT (OSTENSIBLY ON YOUR OWN APPLICATION), NOT KNOW ANYTHING ABOUT IT - AND THEN HAVE TO PAY THE TRUSTEE'S COSTS? THE IMPORTANCE OF GETTING KEY EVIDENCE BEFORE THE COURT
COST BITES 448: PART 36 AND FIXED COSTS: "VERY LATE" ACCEPTANCE OF A DEFENDANT'S OFFER LEADS TO THE CLAIMANT RECOVERING NO COSTS AT ALL
SERVICE POINTS 57: PRESENCE IN THE JURISDICTION, A LAST KNOWN ADDRESS AND THE COST OF GETTING IT WRONG: UNSUCCESFUL CLAIMANT FACES A COSTS BILL OF £500,000...
"LITIGATION SHOULD BE CONDUCTED BY APPLICATIONS AND ORDERS": "THESE EPISTOLARY COMMUNICATIONS WERE LESS THAN SATISFACTORY..."

Archives

Blogroll

  • Fatal Accident Law
  • Legal Futures
  • Personal injury: Liability and Damages

Books

  • Munkman & Exall on Damages for Personal Injuries and Death 15th ed
  • The APIL Guide to Fatal Accidents 4th edition

Useful Links

  • Buntools (for preparing PDF Bundles)
  • Kings Chambers
  • Kings Chambers Costs & Litigation Funding
  • Kings Chambers Serious Injury
  • The Civil Procedure Rules
  • The Law Society Gazette
  • The National Archives Recently Published Judgments
  • The Senior Court Costs Office Guide 2025
  • www.Bailii.org

Copyright

© Gordon Exall, Exall Legal Training, Civil Litigation Brief, 2013-2026. Unauthorised use and or duplication of the material contained on this blog without permission is strictly prohibited.
Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.

To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
  • Membership Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Advertising Policy
  • Copyright
  • Legal Disclaimer

Copyright © 2026 Civil Litigation Brief ®

Powered by Big Yellow Workshop

Loading Comments...

You must be logged in to post a comment.