Civil Litigation Brief
Menu
  • Home
  • About
  • Membership Plans
  • Webinars
  • Login
Updates and Commentary on Civil Procedure, by Gordon Exall, Barrister, Kings Chambers
Browse: Home » Mitchell » Page 2

RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS REFUSED WHEN DEFENDANT WAS TACTICALLY PLAYING FOR TIME

November 25, 2014 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Relief from sanctions

In Talos Capital Ltd -v- JSC Investment Holding Ltd (QBC 21/11/14)* Flaux J refused an application for an extension of time to acknowledge service and challenge the jurisdiction in circumstances where the delay was held to be deliberate and tactical….

AN IMPORTANT CASE ON COSTS; "INTERESTED PARTY" COSTS; RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS AND SUMMARY ASSESSMENT

November 21, 2014 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil Procedure, Costs, Members Content, Relief from sanctions

In Group M Uk Ltd -v- The Cabinet Office  [2014] EWHC 3863 (TCC) Mr Justice Akenhead mad some important observations as to the liability to pay the costs of “interested parties”; the late serving of costs schedules; relief from sanctions…

CLAIMANTS HAD COMPLIED WITH PEREMPTORY ORDER: CASE NOT STRUCK OUT

November 20, 2014 · by gexall · in Appeals, Applications, Avoiding negligence claims, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Relief from sanctions

There is a brief report on Lawtel of the case of Sharma -v- Quality Redfern Solicitors (Ch D Judge Behrens 19/11/2014). The decision concerns the striking out of a claim for breach of an order and the judge finding, on…

RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS GRANTED DESPITE INADEQUATE REPLIES AND BREACH OF PEREMPTORY ORDER

November 17, 2014 · by gexall · in Civil Procedure, Members Content, Relief from sanctions

There is a brief report on Lawtel today of the decision of S Monty QC in In the matter of Bankside Hotels (Ch D 13/11/2014) Relief from sanctions was granted when a party was in breach of a peremptory order and failed…

APPLICATIONS TO SET ASIDE DEFAULT JUDGMENT & THE MITCHELL/DENTON PRINCIPLES: ANOTHER HIGH COURT CASE

November 16, 2014 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Relief from sanctions, Serving documents, Statements of Case

There are now several cases that deal with how the “Mitchell/Denton” principles effect applications to have judgment set aside. In Robinson -v- Kensington & Chelsea Royal London Borough (Sir Michael Tugendhat 03/011.204 QB)* a default judgment was set aside on…

"SIMILAR FACT EVIDENCE" IN CLINICAL NEGLIGENCE CASES: EVIDENCE OF INCOMPETENCE IN OTHER CASES

November 12, 2014 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Expert evidence, Members Content

In Laughton -v- Shalaby [2014] EWCA Civ 1450 the Court of Appeal considered the issue of whether evidence of incompetence in other cases should be admitted in a claim for clinical negligence. THE APPEAL The claimant was appealing a decision…

COSTS SCHEDULE FILED LATE: COSTS ASSESSED AT NIL: NO RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS

November 8, 2014 · by gexall · in Civil Procedure, Costs, Members Content, Relief from sanctions

The short judgment of Deputy District Judge Apthorpe in Gretton -v- Santander [2014]Ew Mic B52(CC) demonstrate that Denton is not an authority that states that relief from sanctions is easy to obtain. The claimant failed to serve and file its…

LORD CHANCELLOR REFUSED RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS: CPR 3.9 APPLIES TO THE HIGH AND MIGHTY AS WELL

November 8, 2014 · by gexall · in Civil Procedure, Members Content, Relief from sanctions

In the  decision yesterday in Lord Chancellor -v- The former Partnership of Taylor Willocks Solicitors [2014] EWHC 3664 (QB) Globe J upheld a decision of Master Leslie refusing to grant the Lord Chancellor relief from sanctions.  The decision is interesting…

"IN TIME" APPLICATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO SERVE PARTICULARS OF CLAIM REFUSED: A DANGER AREA TO WATCH

November 4, 2014 · by gexall · in Appeals, Applications, Avoiding negligence claims, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Relief from sanctions

In Frontier Estates -v- Berwin Leighton Paisner (Ch D 30/10/2014)* John Male QC upheld a decision not to grant an extension of time for service of the particular of claim. What makes this case important is that the application was…

RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS CAN BE HEARD WITHOUT A FORMAL APPLICATION: CUTLER -V- BARNET

November 4, 2014 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Relief from sanctions

In Cutler -v- Barnet (QBD 31/10/14)* Supperstone J held that an application for relief from sanctions could be heard even if it were not made formally in writing. THE CASE The defendant was resisting a claim for possession. She had…

RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS REFUSED: DENTON MADE NO DIFFERENCE

November 3, 2014 · by gexall · in Appeals, Avoiding negligence claims, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Relief from sanctions

In Blemain Finance Ltd -v- Mukhtar &  Osman (28/10/14)* Globe J upheld a decision of the first instance judge refusing relief from sanctions. THE FACTS The claimant sought possession of the defendants’ home following a failure to pay. There was…

CASE NOT STRUCK OUT BECAUSE OF A FAILURE TO FILE TRIAL BUNDLE & PAY COURT FEES

November 3, 2014 · by gexall · in Appeals, Applications, Avoiding negligence claims, Civil Procedure, Costs, Members Content, Relief from sanctions

One of the most read posts on this blog was, in the middle of the Mitchell Madness period, when a judge struck out an action because the trial bundle had been lodged late.  This issue was considered by Hickinbottom J…

MITCHELL: THE CASE THAT KEEPS ON GIVING: EXPERT EVIDENCE; SIMILAR FACT EVIDENCE AND THE EDITING OF WITNESS STATEMENTS

November 2, 2014 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Disclosure, Expert evidence, Members Content, Witness statements

Regular readers of this blog will need no introduction to the procedural issues that Mitchell -v- News Group Newspapers Ltd has given rise to already.  Procedural issues have arisen again and were considered by Mr Justice Warby (2014 EWHC 3590…

EXTENSIONS OF TIME: RESPONDENT'S NOTICES AND THE "MITCHELL" PRINCIPLES & THE "SERIOUSNESS AND SIGNIFICANCE OF THE BREACH"

October 29, 2014 · by gexall · in Appeals, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Relief from sanctions

The question of the general applicability, and the application, of “Mitchell” principles was considered today by the Court of Appeal in Altomart Ltd -v- Salford Estates (No 2) Limited [2014] EWHC 1408. The court considered the principles to be applied…

RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS GRANTED FOLLOWING FAILURE TO GIVE NOTIFICATION OF CFA & ATE

October 21, 2014 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil Procedure, Costs, Members Content, Relief from sanctions

In Caliendo -v- Mischon De Reya [2014] EWHC 3414 (Ch) Mr Justice Hildyard considered an application for relief from sanctions under the post-Denton regime.  He also made interesting observations in relation to applications in relation to considering the relevance of…

SETTING ASIDE JUDGMENT, MITCHELL AND DENTON: THE COURT OF APPEAL'S VIEW

October 15, 2014 · by gexall · in Appeals, Applications, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Statements of Case

The question of how far the “Mitchell/Denton” principles apply to applications by defendants to set aside judgments was considered by the Court of Appeal in Regione Piemonte -v- Dexia Credop SpA [2014] EWCA Civ 1298.  It can be seen that these principles…

DENTON APPLIES TO APPLICATIONS TO SET ASIDE DEFAULT JUDGMENTS: HOCKLEY -v- NORTH EAST LINCOLNSHIRE CONSIDERED

October 7, 2014 · by gexall · in Appeals, Applications, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Relief from sanctions, Statements of Case

The issue of whether the “Mitchell/Denton/CPR 3.9” criteria apply to applications by a defendant to set aside a default judgment has been discussed several times on this blog. In Hockley -v- North Lincolnshire &  Goole NHS Trust (19th September 2014)…

RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS GRANTED: RESPONDENT'S "OPPORTUNISTIC" BEHAVIOUR CONDEMNED

October 3, 2014 · by gexall · in Appeals, Applications, Costs, Members Content, Relief from sanctions

In Long -v- Value Properties [2014] EWHC 2981 (Ch) Mr Justice Barling roundly condemned the defendants for taking opportunistic points in litigation. The judge overturned a decision by the Master refusing relief from sanctions. THE FACTS This was an application…

TALK ON SANCTIONS AND HOW TO AVOID THEM: LEEDS 23rd OCTOBER 2014

September 27, 2014 · by gexall · in Civil Procedure, Costs budgeting, Members Content, Relief from sanctions, Useful links

I am taking part in the Costs and Litigation Funding Update organised by Clarion solicitors and K2 Legal Support in Leeds on the 23rd October 2014. I am  talking on “sanctions and how to avoid them” .Other speakers are dealing…

DURRANT CASE BACK IN THE REPORTS: WHAT PRESUMPTIONS SHOULD A JUDGE DRAW WHEN A PARTY IS DEBARRED FROM CALLING WITNESSES?

September 1, 2014 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Witness statements

The case of Durrant  -v- Chief Constable of Avon & Somerset Constabulary [2013]  EWCA Civ 1264 was well known as one of the first reports on sanctions. The defendant police authority was debarred from calling witness evidence as a result…

ANOTHER RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS CASE – ANOTHER CONSERVATIVE MP: RELIEF GRANTED AFTER FAILURE TO SERVE NOTICE OF FUNDING

August 22, 2014 · by gexall · in Civil Procedure, Costs, Members Content, Relief from sanctions

Relief from sanctions was granted to the claimant in Ye0 MP -v- Times Newspapers Ltd [2014] EWHC 2853 (QB). THE ACTION This was a defamation action where the claimant had failed to file notice of funding with the Particulars of…

DENTON APPLIED IN THE TAX & CHANCERY CHAMBER: LEEDS -v- COMMISSIONERS CONSIDERED

August 14, 2014 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Relief from sanctions

One of the places where Mitchell, and subsequently Denton, had a major impact was the specialist tribunals. As we have seen in this blog Mitchell principles were applied with some vigour and the “clarification” by Denton has also had an effect….

FAILURE TO SERVE NOTICE OF AMENDED CFA DETAILS IS NOT A SERIOUS OR SIGNIFICANT BREACH: HIGH COURT DECISION CONSIDERED IN DETAIL

August 13, 2014 · by gexall · in Appeals, Civil Procedure, Costs, Members Content, Relief from sanctions

The High Court decision in Ultimate Products Ltd -v- Wooley [2014] EWHC 2706 (Ch) provides further guidance as to what the courts are likely to consider “serious or significant” breaches. The High Court judge upheld the decision of the Master…

THE MITCHELL CASE RUMBLES ON: MORE PROCEDURAL ISSUES: SPLIT TRIAL ORDERED

August 4, 2014 · by gexall · in Appeals, Applications, Civil Procedure, Members Content

I feel almost duty bound to continue to report on the Mitchell case, even if now has limited relevance to the question of sanctions. The latest case management decision offers an interesting decision on whether there should be a split…

DENTON CONSIDERED IN THE TAX TRIBUNAL: ELDER -v- REVENUE & CUSTOMS

August 3, 2014 · by gexall · in Applications, Members Content, Relief from sanctions

The Denton case was considered by the First Tier Chamber: Tax Tribunal in Elder -v- Revenue & Customs [2014] UKFTT 728 (TC). Consideration of the Denton principles led to relief being granted.  The decision is, obviously, specific to the rules relating to…

DENTON APPLIED: A (VERY) BRIEF REPORT

July 31, 2014 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil Procedure, Disclosure, Members Content, Relief from sanctions

The Denton principles were mentioned, in passing, in the judgment of HHJ Moloney QC In NNN -v- DI [2014] EWHC B14 (QB). The defendant had been in default in serving a list of documents on the claimant.   A peremptory…

LITIGATION AFTER JACKSON (POST DENTON EDITION): 12 POINT SURVIVAL GUIDE

July 26, 2014 · by gexall · in Appeals, Applications, Avoiding negligence claims, Civil Procedure, Costs, Costs budgeting, Members Content, Part 36, Relief from sanctions, Service of the claim form, Serving documents, Useful links, Witness statements

In August last year I wrote Litigation after Jackson a  10 point Survival Guide.  All of the points made in that post remain valid. I have added another 2 to deal with the situation post -Denton. The biggest danger, post…

DENTON APPLIED IN THE TAX TRIBUNAL: NO PERMISSION TO APPEAL THREE YEARS LATE

July 25, 2014 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Relief from sanctions

The Mitchell and Denton cases were reviewed by Judge John Brooks in Meah -v- The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs [2014] UKFTT 708 (TC).  The proposed appellant was three years late.  The refusal of permission to appeal out of…

POST DENTON RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS APPEAL IN THE HIGH COURT: RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS GRANTED: "UNREASONABLE" DEFENDANT ORDERED TO PAY COSTS

July 23, 2014 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Relief from sanctions, Witness statements

I am grateful to Ashley Pratt of St James Chambers for his note of the decision of Mr Justice King in Johnson -v- Bourne Leisure on the 21st July 2014. King J granted relief from sanctions and allowed an appeal from the…

DENTON: THE DISSENTING JUDGMENT OF JACKSON L.J. CONSIDERED

July 19, 2014 · by gexall · in Appeals, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Relief from sanctions

In the hundreds of articles, blogs and commentaries on the decision in Denton the “dissenting” judgment is barely mentioned or considered.  Whilst all three members of the court were in agreement that each of the appeals should be allowed there…

WHAT IS MEANT BY "SERIOUS AND SIGNIFICANT"? THE COURT CONCENTRATES MUCH MORE UPON THE EFFECT OF THE BREACH RATHER THAN THE BREACH ITSELF

July 18, 2014 · by gexall · in Appeals, Applications, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Relief from sanctions

In Denton -v- White;  [2014] EWCA Civ 906. the Court of Appeal eschewed the use of the word “trivial” where a court is considering an application for relief from sanctions.  Instead the Court stated that the focus should be on whether…

MITCHELL NOT EXTENDED TO ADMINISTRATIVE LAW: AN ISSUE FOR ANOTHER DAY

July 17, 2014 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Relief from sanctions

In R (Abbas Mohammadi -v- Secretary of State for the Home Department [2014] EWHC 2251 (Admin)the court did not decide the issue of whether “Mitchell” principles applied to applications for judicial review. THE FACTS The applicant was seeking judicial review of…

CIVIL PROCEDURE – HOW IT SHOULD BE DONE: A DESCRIPTION OF HOW THE ASBESTOS COURT WORKS

July 15, 2014 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil Procedure, Costs budgeting, Members Content

Anyone want to see a description of a civil procedure system running smoothly then read Master McCloud’s description of the “asbestos disease court” in her judgment in Yates -v- Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs [2014] EWCH 2311 (QB)….

MORE ABOUT APPEALING MITCHELL DECISIONS OUT OF TIME: RELEVANT CASE LAW

July 13, 2014 · by gexall · in Appeals, Members Content, Relief from sanctions

A post yesterday considered the possibility of appealing, out of time, the unjust orders that may have been made following Mitchell and the subsequent “clarification” in Denton.  There is some law on this topic, ironically it is a result of…

"HISTORIC" SANCTIONS DECISIONS: ARE YOU GOING TO APPLY TO APPEAL OUT OF TIME

July 12, 2014 · by gexall · in Appeals, Applications, Members Content, Relief from sanctions

In Denton -v- White [2014] EWCA Civ 906.   the Court of Appeal stated that we think that the judgment in Mitchell has been misunderstood and is being misapplied by some courts. It is clear that it needs to be clarified and amplified in…

DENTON, RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS AND THE "LITIGATOR'S DILEMMA": LIFE IS NOW DANGEROUS FOR RESPONDENTS

July 9, 2014 · by gexall · in Avoiding negligence claims, Civil Procedure, Costs, Members Content, Relief from sanctions

I have written before about the “litigator’s dilemma” in relation to whether a point should be taken in relation to a breach, or an application for relief of sanctions opposed.  The Denton decision makes this issue far more difficult for…

ANATOMY OF A POST-DENTON APPLICATION FOR RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS 4: COSTS, INDEMNITY COSTS & EVERYBODY IS AT RISK AS TO COSTS

July 8, 2014 · by gexall · in Applications, Members Content, Relief from sanctions

In the fourth in the series of articles we look at the very heavy incentive the Court of Appeal imposed upon litigants (and litigators) not to object to applications for relief from sanctions in “all but the most serious cases”….

ANATOMY OF A POST-DENTON APPLICATION FOR RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS 3: THE "THIRD STAGE": EVERYTHING IS IN THE MIX

July 7, 2014 · by gexall · in Appeals, Applications, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Relief from sanctions

Having considered whether the breach is serious or significant and the reason for the breach a judge hearing a relief from sanctions application may have to go on to the “third stage”. Here the court considers all aspects of the…

ANATOMY OF A POST-DENTON RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS APPLICATION 2: THE REASON MAY NOT BE GOOD ENOUGH BUT THIS DOES NOT PREVENT RELIEF BEING GRANTED

July 7, 2014 · by gexall · in Appeals, Applications, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Relief from sanctions

The first stage of an application for relief from sanctions has been considered in an earlier post.  If the breach is neither serious or significant then the court need not spend too much time on the second and third stages….

ANATOMY OF A POST-DENTON RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS APPLICATION 1: THE DEATH OF THE WORD "TRIVIAL"

July 6, 2014 · by gexall · in Appeals, Applications, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Relief from sanctions

There are now plenty of places that summarise and give views on the effect of the Court of Appeal decision in Denton -v- White.  Here I want to start on the task of looking, in some detail, at the practical…

COURT OF APPEAL SANCTIONS HEARING: 70 KEY POINTS OF THE JUDGMENT

July 4, 2014 · by gexall · in Members Content, Relief from sanctions

The 70 key points of the Court of Appeal judgment in Denton -v- White [2014] EWCA Civ 906. “We hope that what follows will avoid the need in future to resort to the earlier authorities.” (Paragraph 24). CRITICISM OF MITCHELL 1. The…

SANCTIONS HEARING 6: USEFUL LINKS AND WATCH THE JUDGMENT

July 4, 2014 · by gexall · in Members Content, Relief from sanctions

These are links to commentary and comment on the Court of Appeal decision in Denton -v- White [2014] EWCA Civ 906. 1.  The Law Society Gazette reviews the decision (and also allows you to see the judgment being given).(Also a…

SANCTIONS HEARING 4: DOES DECADENT VAPOURS LEAVE A PLEASANT SMELL?

July 4, 2014 · by gexall · in Appeals, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Relief from sanctions

The second substantive decision was Decadent  Vapours.  Here the Court of Appeal overturned a refusal to grant relief from sanctions and the claimant’s case was allowed to proceed. THE FACTS The claimant failed to make payments of fees by the…

COURT OF APPEAL HEARING ON SANCTIONS TODAY: BREAKING NEWS AND LINK TO JUDGMENT

July 4, 2014 · by gexall · in Appeals, Members Content, Relief from sanctions

The Court of Appeal have allowed all three appeals in the sanctions cases that were before them. This is breaking news (as I write the judgment is still being given).   In Decadent Vapours the action had been struck out…

DATE SET FOR JUDGMENTS ON COURT OF APPEAL SANCTIONS HEARINGS

July 2, 2014 · by gexall · in Members Content, Relief from sanctions

Judgment in the three recent cases where the Court of Appeal reviewed the application of the Mitchell criteria is to be given in in  Court 71 in the Royal Courts of Justice on  Friday 4th July at 2pm. TO SEE THE ARGUMENTS…

"MISAPPLICATION OF THE WORD SANCTION": EXTENDING TIME ON A CONSENT ORDER IS NOT AN APPLICATION FOR RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS: SERVICE -v- BEACKON CONSIDERED

June 29, 2014 · by gexall · in Appeals, Applications, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Relief from sanctions, Second set of proceedings

The case of Service Insurance Company Ltd -v- Beackon is briefly reported on Lawtel on the 26th June 2014.   It is a High Court decision by Andrews J where he rejected an appeal by an insurance company against an…

WITNESS STATEMENTS CANNOT BE RELIED ON AT TRIAL IF SERVED LATE AND RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS NOT GIVEN

June 25, 2014 · by gexall · in Civil Procedure, Members Content, Relief from sanctions, Witness statements

Lawtel today reported the case of Davies -v- Liberty Place [2014] EWHC 2034 (Admin). In that case Leggatt J stated that a party who served a witness statement late was not automatically precluded from relying on that statement at trial….

FIRST ANNIVERSARY OF CIVIL LITIGATION BRIEF (OR CONFESSIONS OF A RELUCTANT BLOGGER)

June 23, 2014 · by gexall · in Avoiding negligence claims, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Relief from sanctions, Risks of litigation, Useful links

Today marks the first anniversary of the setting up of this blog, tomorrow marks the anniversary of the first post. It gives an opportunity to recap (and reminisce).  CIVIL PROCEDURE IN JUNE 2013 When the blog started civil procedure was…

NO RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS AFTER APPELLANT FAILED TO FILE TRANSCRIPTS ON TIME.

June 21, 2014 · by gexall · in Appeals, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Relief from sanctions

In  Patterson -v- Spencer [2014] EWHC 1878 (Ch) Henry Carr QC (sitting as a High Court Judge) refused an appellant’s application for relief from sanctions after she failed to file transcripts of the initial hearing. THE FACTS One of the defendants,…

ANOTHER CASE WHERE PARTY REFUSED RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS FOLLOWING LATE SERVICE OF WITNESS STATEMENT

June 21, 2014 · by gexall · in Appeals, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Relief from sanctions, Witness statements

The case of Swinden -v- Grima (Nicol J) 18/06/2014 is briefly reported on Lawtel (20th June). It is another example of the court refusing permission to serve witness statements late. THE FACTS The defendant served a witness statement on the…

← Previous 1 2 3 … 5 Next →

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email. Subscription notifies you of a new post, it does not give you access to members' content.

Join 12.4K other subscribers

Recent Posts

  • COMMERCIAL LITIGATORS ON THE NAUGHTY STEP 5: PD57AC AND REFERENCE TO DOCUMENTS: WHY LAWYERS NEED TO BE PRISED AWAY FROM THEIR COMFORT BLANKETS
  • THE DEFENDANT WAS OUT OF TIME FOR APPLYING FOR PERMISSION TO APPEAL: THE COURT DID NOT HAVE POWER AT THIS STAGE IN ANY EVENT
  • ACTION STRUCK OUT UNDER CPR 3.4(2)(c) FOR NON COMPLIANCE: DENTON PRINCIPLES APPLIED
  • IS AN APPLICATION VALID IF THE INCORRECT COURT FEE IS PAID? THE ISSUES CONSIDERED…
  • SERVICE POINTS 37 : IS SERVICE ON A P.0. BOX GOOD SERVICE? (OH – AND BY THE WAY – AS IT TURNS OUT – THE CLAIM FORM WAS NEVER, IN FACT, SERVED AT ALL): A BIT OF A SURPRISE FOR THE CLAIMANT AT THE APPEAL STAGE

Top Posts

  • SERVICE POINTS 37 : IS SERVICE ON A P.0. BOX GOOD SERVICE? (OH - AND BY THE WAY - AS IT TURNS OUT - THE CLAIM FORM WAS NEVER, IN FACT, SERVED AT ALL): A BIT OF A SURPRISE FOR THE CLAIMANT AT THE APPEAL STAGE
  • IS AN APPLICATION VALID IF THE INCORRECT COURT FEE IS PAID? THE ISSUES CONSIDERED...
  • OPENING LINES TO START THE WEEK: "FOR CENTURIES, IT HAS BEEN RECOGNISED THAT HUMAN HEARING CAN BE DAMAGED BY EXPOSURE TO LOUD NOISE"
  • BACK TO BASICS MONDAY: WHEN YOU ARE SEEKING PERMISSION TO RELY ON EXPERT EVIDENCE THE COURT HAS TO KNOW HOW MUCH IT WILL ALL COST...
  • ACTION STRUCK OUT UNDER CPR 3.4(2)(c) FOR NON COMPLIANCE: DENTON PRINCIPLES APPLIED

Archives

Blogroll

  • Fatal Accident Law
  • Legal Futures
  • Personal injury: Liability and Damages

Books

  • Munkman & Exall on Damages for Personal Injuries and Death 15th ed
  • The APIL Guide to Fatal Accidents 4th edition

Useful Links

  • Buntools (for preparing PDF Bundles)
  • Kings Chambers
  • Kings Chambers Costs & Litigation Funding
  • Kings Chambers Serious Injury
  • The Civil Procedure Rules
  • The Law Society Gazette
  • The National Archives Recently Published Judgments
  • The Senior Court Costs Office Guide 2025
  • www.Bailii.org

Copyright

© Gordon Exall, Exall Legal Training, Civil Litigation Brief, 2013-2026. Unauthorised use and or duplication of the material contained on this blog without permission is strictly prohibited.
Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.

To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
  • Membership Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Advertising Policy
  • Copyright
  • Legal Disclaimer

Copyright © 2026 Civil Litigation Brief

Powered by Big Yellow Workshop