Civil Litigation Brief ®
Menu
  • Home
  • About
  • Membership Plans
  • Webinars
  • Login
Updates and Commentary on Civil Procedure, by Gordon Exall, Barrister, Kings Chambers
Browse: Home » Remote hearings » Page 2
COURT OF APPEAL HEAR CASE BY VIDEOCONFERENCING

COURT OF APPEAL HEAR CASE BY VIDEOCONFERENCING

April 2, 2020 · by gexall · in Appeals, Civil Procedure, Coronavirus, Members Content

Fairly soon, I am sure, the holding of hearings remotely will become such a commonplace that they will pass without comment. In the interim, however, it is worthwhile noting that the Court of Appeal heard an appeal on the 26th…

REMOTE HEARINGS (1): HOW ARE THE COURTS COPING? TWO CASES TODAY

REMOTE HEARINGS (1): HOW ARE THE COURTS COPING? TWO CASES TODAY

March 31, 2020 · by gexall · in Access to justice, Civil Procedure, Coronavirus, Members Content, Remote hearings

I hope to keep a running record of how the courts are coping with remote hearings. Two cases reported today provide examples. Telephone used in committal proceedings In  Anwer v Central Bridging Loans Ltd [2020] EWHC 765 (Ch) Mr Justice…

REMOTE HEARINGS: BUT WHAT ABOUT "WITNESS DEMEANOUR"?

REMOTE HEARINGS: BUT WHAT ABOUT “WITNESS DEMEANOUR”?

March 29, 2020 · by gexall · in Coronavirus, Members Content, Remote hearings, Witness statements

One of the issues that has been raised in objection to “remote” hearings is the question of witness demeanour.  In modern litigation recent case law suggests that this is not a major factor in any event.   “No doubt it…

REMOTE HEARING IN THE COURT OF PROTECTION: 17 PARTICIPANTS, 11 WITNESSES AND TWO JOURNALISTS: LESSONS TO BE LEARNT

REMOTE HEARING IN THE COURT OF PROTECTION: 17 PARTICIPANTS, 11 WITNESSES AND TWO JOURNALISTS: LESSONS TO BE LEARNT

March 28, 2020 · by gexall · in Coronavirus, Members Content, Remote hearings

I am grateful to Dr Penny Cooper for pointing out to me that the decision of Mr Justice Mostyn in A Clinical Commissioning Group v AF & Ors [2020] EWCOP 16 involved a hearing remotely.  It contains an important comment…

THE FIRST VIRTUAL TRIAL IN THE COMMERCIAL COURT - READ ALL ABOUT IT

THE FIRST VIRTUAL TRIAL IN THE COMMERCIAL COURT – READ ALL ABOUT IT

March 28, 2020 · by gexall · in Civil Procedure, Coronavirus, Members Content, Remote hearings

There is an interesting article by Stewarts about an ongoing trial in the commercial court that is continuing remotely.   The trial of  National Bank of Kazakhstan & Others v The Bank of New York Mellon & Ors is continuing remotely….

MORE USEFUL GUIDANCE ON BUNDLES AND VIRTUAL HEARINGS

MORE USEFUL GUIDANCE ON BUNDLES AND VIRTUAL HEARINGS

March 28, 2020 · by gexall · in Applications, Bundles, Coronavirus, Members Content, Remote hearings, Useful links

Caselines has kindly sent me details of their very useful “COVID-19 Resource Hub”     TOPICS COVERED Pandemics, Privacy, and Confidential Data Security: Managing Information Risk is Critical Video: Introduction to a CaseLines Bundle Quick Reference Guide: From Invite to…

GUIDANCE IN DEVON AND CORNWALL: VACATION OF COURT HEARINGS AND RE-LISTING

March 27, 2020 · by gexall · in Adjournments, Applications, Coronavirus, Members Content, Remote hearings

The President of Plymouth Law Society has sent out the following guidance. COVID-19 – URGENT – CIVIL COURT HEARINGS TO BE VACATED – HHJ GORE QC Dear Member If you are a Civil Court user please read the notice below from…

INNOVATIVE APPROACH WHEN PROPOSED APPELLANT UNABLE TO ATTEND COURT

INNOVATIVE APPROACH WHEN PROPOSED APPELLANT UNABLE TO ATTEND COURT

March 27, 2020 · by gexall · in Appeals, Applications, Members Content, Remote hearings, Written advocacy

In  [2020] EWHC 735 (QB) Mrs Justice Tipples took an innovative approach to the problems caused by a claimant’s inability to attend court because of the coronavirus problems.  The submissions were made by email.   THE CASE The judge was…

REMOTE HEARING - WENT AHEAD AND WORKED

REMOTE HEARING – WENT AHEAD AND WORKED

March 27, 2020 · by gexall · in Applications, Coronavirus, Members Content, Remote hearings

In Jalla & Ors v Royal Dutch Shell Plc & Ors [2020] EWHC 738 (TCC) Mr Justice Stuart-Smith gave judgment in a hearing that was conducted remotely.  This demonstrates that, with considerable effort, remote hearings can work in complex hearings….

TWITTER SOURCED ADVICE: "LOW TECH" IDEAS FOR WORKING AT HOME

TWITTER SOURCED ADVICE: “LOW TECH” IDEAS FOR WORKING AT HOME

March 27, 2020 · by gexall · in Coronavirus, Members Content

Again I have used the media of Twitter to get “low tech” advice for working at home.  Your ironing board has more uses than one. Emma Bower (@EmmaMcBower)  I’d say keeping a normal routine of getting up,  washed, dressed and…

THE EXPLANATORY NOTES TO THE CORONAVIRUS BILL: LIVE LINKS IN COURT PROCEEDINGS

THE EXPLANATORY NOTES TO THE CORONAVIRUS BILL: LIVE LINKS IN COURT PROCEEDINGS

March 24, 2020 · by gexall · in Applications, Coronavirus, Members Content, Remote hearings

The explanatory notes to the Coronavirus Bill have a detailed explanation of the plans for the expansion of live links in court proceedings, particularly criminal proceedings. Clause 51 and Schedule 22 Expansion of availability of live links in criminal proceedings…

USEFUL GUIDANCE ON REMOTE HEARINGS: FROM START TO FINISH

USEFUL GUIDANCE ON REMOTE HEARINGS: FROM START TO FINISH

March 24, 2020 · by gexall · in Applications, Members Content, Remote hearings, Useful links

I am grateful to barristers  Rebecca Musgrove and   Iain Hutchinson who have sent me a copy (and permission to circulate) of their guide to remote hearings.  It provides step by step guidance (and photographs) to help those unfamilar with the…

← Previous 1 2

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email. Subscription notifies you of a new post, it does not give you access to members' content.

Join 12.2K other subscribers

Recent Posts

  • CHANGES COMING INTO FORCE ON THE 1ST OCTOBER 2026: HOUSING LAWYERS BE AWARE…
  • THE CURRENT IMPORTANCE OF PLEADINGS 95: THE DEFENDANT’S ARGUMENT THAT THE JUDGE HAD AWARDED THE CLAIMANTS MORE THAN THEIR PLEADED CASE
  • EXPERT WATCH 72: THE DEFENDANT HAD LEFT IT TOO LATE TO OBJECT TO THE CLAIMANTS’ EXPERT EVIDENCE: THIS SHOULD HAVE BEEN DONE AT TRIAL NOT AT THE APPEAL STAGE
  • THROWBACK FRIDAY: FOR WANT OF A PAGE IN A BUNDLE THE DAMAGES WERE LOWER… (SEPTEMBER 2015)
  • THE PAYING PARTY’S MANUAL: HOW TO REDUCE YOUR OWN CLIENT’S LIABILITY TO PAY THEIR OPPONENT’S COSTS: THE WEBINAR, THE BOOK AND THE TOOLKIT

Top Posts

COST BITES 455: COURT OF APPEAL DECISION TODAY ON WHETHER A CLIENT IS ENTITLED TO RAISE PART 18 QUESTIONS AS TO WHETHER THE SOLICITOR OBTAINED COMMISSION ON AN ATE PREMIUM
WITNESS EVIDENCE WEDNESDAY: WAIVING LEGAL PROFESSIONAL PRIVILEGE BY MENTIONING IT IN A WITNESS STATEMENT
COST BITES 456: LET US ALL REMEMBER THAT THE DISPUTE THAT REACHED THE COURT OF APPEAL TODAY WAS OVER THE PRINCELY SUM OF £25: "THE CLIENT HAS NEVER HAD ANY REAL ECONOMIC INTEREST IN THE PURSUIT OF THIS COSTLY LITIGATION"
PROPORTIONALITY IN LITIGATION (1): A TEN POINT GUIDE FOR CIVIL LITIGATORS: A REVIEW OF CASE LAW AND POSTS OVER THE PAST 13 YEARS
THE SRA CANNOT COMPEL A SOLICITOR TO DISCLOSE A CLIENT’S PRIVILEGED DOCUMENTS: THE FUNDAMENTAL IMPORTANCE OF LEGAL PROFESSIONAL PRIVILEGE

Archives

Blogroll

  • Fatal Accident Law
  • Legal Futures
  • Personal injury: Liability and Damages

Books

  • Munkman & Exall on Damages for Personal Injuries and Death 15th ed
  • The APIL Guide to Fatal Accidents 4th edition

Useful Links

  • Buntools (for preparing PDF Bundles)
  • Kings Chambers
  • Kings Chambers Costs & Litigation Funding
  • Kings Chambers Serious Injury
  • The Civil Procedure Rules
  • The Law Society Gazette
  • The National Archives Recently Published Judgments
  • The Senior Court Costs Office Guide 2025
  • www.Bailii.org

Copyright

© Gordon Exall, Exall Legal Training, Civil Litigation Brief, 2013-2026. Unauthorised use and or duplication of the material contained on this blog without permission is strictly prohibited.
Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.

To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
  • Membership Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Advertising Policy
  • Copyright
  • Legal Disclaimer

Copyright © 2026 Civil Litigation Brief ®

Powered by Big Yellow Workshop

Loading Comments...

You must be logged in to post a comment.