THROWING EVERYTHING IN AT TRIAL- INCLUDING THE KITCHEN CABINET: YOU HAVE TO PUT YOUR CASE (AND PLEAD IT)
There are some important observations in the judgment of Mr Justice Henry Carr in Neptune (Europe) Ltd v Devol Kitchens Ltd [2017] EWHC 2172 (Pat) about the need to plead and put a case at trial. An attempt to introduce a…
EXPERT WITNESS GIVEN “NO WEIGHT AT ALL”: FAILURE TO DISCLOSE A CONFLICT OF INTEREST
There are some interesting passages in the judgment of David Stone (sitting as a Deputy High Court Judge) in Technomed Ltd & Anor v Bluecrest Health Screening Ltd & Anor [2017] EWHC 2142 (Ch). Here we look at the judgment…
“ROBUST” BUT NOT GRATUITOUSLY OFFENSIVE:” SRA GUIDANCE ON COMMUNICATIONS WITH OTHER FIRMS AND LITIGANTS IN PERSON: THE FUTILITY OF RUDENESS
The Solicitors Regulatory Authority has issued guidance today on “Offensive communications” It gives me a chance to recap on earlier posts about the futility of rudeness. “Your role is to act in the client’s best interests; antagonising the other side…
SOMETIMES YOU DON’T HAVE TO SIGN STATEMENTS OF CASE WITH A STATEMENT OF TRUTH: HIGH COURT DECISION ON AMENDING PARTICULARS OF CLAIM
The case of Kimathi v Foreign and Commonwealth Office [2017] EWHC 2145 (QB) promises to be a legal epic. As I understand it the trial is not even half way through. It was opened in April 2017. It is unlikely…
CLINICAL NEGLIGENCE AND INSURANCE COSTS: POLICY OF £10,000 WAS BOTH REASONABLE AND PROPORTIONAL: HIGH COURT DECISION
In Mitchell v Gilling-Smith [2017] EWHC B18 (Costs) Master Leonard held that a £10,000 premium incurred in a clinical negligence case was reasonable and proportional. It also highlights the importance of a paying party bringing actual evidence to court if they…
PROVING THINGS 66: IT ALL COMES DOWN TO THE CREDIBILITY OF WITNESSES: WHERE THERE’S A WILL THERE’S A WAY
This blog regularly looks at cases in which trial judges assess the credibility of witnesses. Here I want to look at the careful analysis of witness evidence by HHJ Paul Matthews (sitting as a High Court judge) in Legg & Anor…
WITNESS STATEMENTS “INADMISSIBLE”: CONTAINED “SUBJECTIVE INTENTION”, “OPINION” AND “LEGAL ARGUMENT”: ANOTHER EXAMPLE
A brief passage under the judgment of Mr Justice Arnold in Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Ltd v Fougera Sweden Holding 2 AB [2017] EWHC 1995 (Ch) serves to show how much “witness evidence” served by a litigant can, in fact, be inadmissible….
IS THE BUDGET DEFINITIVE ON ASSESSMENT? MORE CATS, MORE PIGEONS: THERE ARE NOW TWO TRAINS OF THOUGHT ON THE HOURLY RATE
Earlier this month I blogged on the decision in RNB v London Borough of Newham [2017] EWHC B15 (Costs). Deputy Master Campbell decided that the hourly rate could be challenged at the assessment stage even if the total of a particular…
WITNESS EVIDENCE: THE DANGERS OF OPINION EVIDENCE AND TRYING TO USURP THE ROLE OF THE JUDGE : BACK TO MARSH -v- MINISTRY OF DEFENCE
Anyone considering matters relating to witness evidence and the drafting of statements will be drawn like a moth to the fire to the decision of Lady Justice Thirwall in Marsh -v- Ministry of Justice [2017] EWHC 1040. Once again I am returning…
THE DUTY TO PUT YOUR CASE : FINDINGS MADE ON KEY POINTS WHICH WERE NOT PUT TO THE WITNESS OVERTURNED ON APPEAL
In Chen v Ng (British Virgin Islands) [2017] UKPC 27 the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council considered the extent of the duty to put a case to a witness. It is a reminder of the importance of putting a case…
DEFENDANT DEBARRED FROM CALLING WITNESS EVIDENCE AT TRIAL: COURT OF APPEAL OVERTURNS FINDING FOR DEFENDANT
The case of Durrant -v- Chief Constable of Avon & Somerset Constabulary is a long-running saga. We have looked at it twice before. The incident occurred in 2009. In 2013 the Court of Appeal overturned a judge’s decision to grant…
ANOTHER SERVICE CASE: AVOIDING THE PROCESS SERVER CAN LEAD TO AN ORDER THAT ALTERNATIVE METHOD IS GOOD SERVICE
I resolved not to write about service of the claim form cases for a while. However the cases keep coming through. CPR 6.15(2) allows the court to order that steps already taken to bring the claim form to attention of…
WRITING TO THE COURT UNILATERALLY (AGAIN) – PROCEDURAL FAIRNESS AND WHY JUDGES NEED THE PATIENCE OF A SAINT
I have no plans to expand this blog to cover issues relating to procedure in Employment Tribunals. However there are certain passages of the judgment of Mr Justice Kerr in Jones v The Secretary of State for Business Innovation &…
ANOTHER LATE COSTS BUDGET: RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS GRANTED TO ERRANT DEFENDANTS WHO SERVED BUDGET 10 DAYS LATE
In Mott & Anor v Long & Anor [2017] EWHC 2130 (TCC) His Honour Judge Grant (sitting as a judge of the High Court) considered a relief from sanctions application in relation to defendants who had served a costs budget ten…
SERVICE ON A NOMINATED SOLICITOR: BE CLEAR WHO YOU REPRESENT: “A THOROUGHLY TECHNICAL POINT”, UNATTRACTIVE, MISCONCEIVED AND “REFLECTS NO CREDIT ON THE INSURERS OR THEIR ADVISERS”
Earlier this week Master McCloud commented upon “a dry and unlovely crop of procedural service issues” in the Masters’ Corridor. These issues may well follow the Masters around. Master Davison sits as a Recorder. In that capacity he decided an…
COPYING THE OTHER SIDE INTO CORRESPONDENCE WITH THE COURT: A RECAP AND REVIEW OF THE EARLIER CASE MENTIONED
I am writing, again, about the the judgment of Mr Justice Kerr in Topping v Ralph Tristees Ltd [2017] EWHC 1954 (QB). The point the case makes about the correct route of appeal has been commented on, however I had not anticipated…
DESTINATION OF APPEALS FROM A DISTRICT JUDGE ALLOCATED A CIRCUIT JUDGE’S WORK: IMPORTANT WORDS ON COMMUNICATING WITH THE COURT
The judgment of Mr Justice Kerr in Topping v Ralph Tristees Ltd [2017] EWHC 1954 (QB) is of considerable importance in relation to the correct route for appeals. It was held that the correct route of appeal from a district…
PROVING THINGS 65: : ASSUMPTIONS ARE NOT EVIDENCE: (IF THE COURT OF APPEAL HAVE TO ASK FOR THE MATTER TO BE MADE SIMPLE YOU ARE IN SERIOUS TROUBLE)
The case of Ted Baker Plc & Anor v Axa Insurance UK Plc & Ors [2017] EWCA Civ 4097 could serve as a parable of modern litigation. The claimant won the first trial on this matter, establishing the defendant insurers were…
STOPPING PROBLEMS WITH SERVICE OF THE CLAIM FORM SPRINGING UP: 10 KEY POINTS
In Caretech Community Services Ltd v Oakden & Ors [2017] EWHC 1944 (QB) Master McCloud described how the Masters’ Corridor is plagued by “a dry and unlovely crop of procedural service issues. Despite efforts by numerous courts at all levels to prevent their…
ARRANGEMENTS FOR VULNERABLE WITNESSES: HURDLES IN THE WAY OF SENSIBLE ARRANGEMENTS
The very title of the case Ajayi v Abu & Anor (labour exploitation : human trafficking : modern slavery) [2017] EWHC 1946 (QB) gives a clue that this is going to be an important and difficult issue. The judgment, however, highlights…
BLUEBELLS, THE MASTERS’ CORRIDOR AND THE CLAIM FORM: “A DRY AND UNLOVELY CROP OF PROCEDURAL SERVICE ISSUES”
There are numerous cases about service of the claim form on this blog. They are clearly a major issue in the Masters’ Corridor. Witness the opening words of Master McCloud’s judgment in Caretech Community Services Ltd v Oakden & Ors [2017]…
LATE (BUT NOT VERY LATE) AMENDMENTS ALLOWED: LIMITATION DEFENCE WAS NOT “MUCKING AROUND AT THE LAST MOMENT”
In Vilca & Ors v XSTRATA Ltd & Anor [2017] EWHC 2096 (QB) Mr Justice Stuart Smith allowed a late, but not “very late” application by the defendant to allow it to plead limitation. “To my mind… all of the…
A GOOD REASON WHY YOU SHOULD LOVE (OR AT LEAST MEDIATE WITH) THY NEIGHBOUR: INDEMNITY COSTS OF £200,000
The Court of Appeal judgment in Dickinson & Anor v Cassillas [2017] EWCA Civ 1254 serves as a warning for anyone involved in a neighbour dispute. The Court dismissed the appellants’ appeal in relation to findings against them after a trial….
COSTS BUDGETING: IMPORTANCE GUIDANCE FROM MASTER MCCLOUD: HOW SHOULD THE COSTS OF BUDGETING BE DEALT WITH IN FORM H AND THE FINAL BILL?
Important guidance was given this morning by Master McCloud (sitting as Deputy Costs Judge) in Woodburn v Thomas (Costs budgeting) [2017] EWHC B16 (Costs).It relates to how the costs of budgeting should be dealt with in Precedent H and any in…
WHAT DO YOU DO WHEN IT ALL GETS TOO MUCH (OR IT IS YOU THAT HAS TO PICK UP THE PIECES): A RECAP
I am repeating, in large part, an earlier post. I do so without apology. Part of my job involves, periodically, dealing with cases (sometimes multiple cases) where someone has “gone off the rails” leaving numerous practical and procedural problems…
ISSUING NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT OF COSTS PREMATURELY: CAN CAUSE PROBLEMS: CLAIMANT SUCCESSFUL ON THE THIRD ATTEMPT
There is an article on the Temple Garden Chambers website of the decision of Master Gordon-Saker of the judgment in Austin -v- East Sussex Fire and Rescue Service (08/08/17). The report concentrates upon the Master’s decision that he would not…
MORE ON FISH FILES: “LEAVE THEM IN THE CORNER UNTIL THEY START TO SMELL”: RECOGNISING THE PROBLEM AND SOLUTIONS
Everyone, at some stage, has a “fish file” – a file that has been left for so long it has started to smell (sometimes literally). Consequently the litigator avoids it and it gets smellier and smellier. These files are always ripe….
COSTS AFTER CLAIMANT’S PART 36 OFFER ACCEPTED LATE: FIXED COSTS, ASSESSED COSTS OR INDEMNITY COSTS? CIRCUIT JUDGE DECISION
I am grateful to Jonathan Frith from Winns solicitors for sending me a copy of the decision of HHJ Walden-Smith in Hislop -v- Perde a decision made in the County Court at Central London. I set the decision out in…
PROVING HANDWRITING IN CIVIL CASES: EXPERT EVIDENCE NOT ALWAYS NECESSARY
I am returning to the decision of Chief Master Marsh in 44 Wellfit Street Ltd v GMR Services Ltd [2017] EWHC 1841 (Ch). We have already looked at that case in relation to false emails and the significance of CPR 32.19 ….
BULLOCK AND SANDERSON ORDERS IN PRACTICE: UNSUCCESSFUL DEFENDANT ORDERED TO INDEMNIFY CLAIMANT AGAINST SUCCESSFUL DEFENDANTS’ COSTS
One of the abiding memories of learning (and teaching) civil procedure is knowing the difference between a Bullock and a Sanderson order. Students (and practitioners) can see a Bullock order in practice in the decision of Mr Justice Nicol in Jabang…
EXPERT EVIDENCE: WHEN PART OF THE EVIDENCE IS “ABSURD” – THIS IS NO SMALL BEER
I am grateful to barrister Simon Mills for sending me a copy of the judgment of Judge Waksman QC (sitting as a judge of the High Court) in BHL -v- Leumi ABL Limited [2017] EWHC 1871 (QB). Here I look at…
COSTS BUDGETS:HOURLY RATES IN THE BUDGET ARE NOT DETERMINATIVE OF THE HOURLY RATES ON ASSESSMENT: A CAT AMONG THE PIGEONS HERE
In RNB v London Borough of Newham [2017] EWHC B15 (Costs) Deputy Master Campbell made an important decision in relation to hourly rates on assessment. The rates set out in the cost budget are not determinative of the rates allowed on…
THE STRENGTH OF ENGLISH LAW: GUIDANCE WHICH NEEDS TO BE GIVEN AT HOME NOT JUST ABROAD
The Courts and Tribunals service have today produced a short guide – essentially selling the English courts* and the UK Jurisdiction. In essence it is a marketing booklet to persuade foreign litigants to use court in the UK and to…
COMPLYING WITH DIRECTIONS IN THE FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL: IT CAN BE A TAXING MATTER: PUBLIC BODIES SHOULD LIVE UP TO THE STANDARDS EXPECTED IN THE CONDUCT OF LITIGATION
The decision of the Supreme Court in BPP Holdings Ltd & Ors v Revenue and Customs [2017] UKSC 55 is interesting for a number of reasons. It is about the provision of textbooks (on law and accountancy presumably) to students….
COSTS AFTER A PART 36 OFFER AFFECTED BY THE CHANGE IN THE DISCOUNT RATE: CONDUCT OF DEFENCE ALONE SUFFICIENT TO JUSTIFY INDEMNITY COSTS
I have written several times about the judgment of Thirlwall LJ in Marsh -v- MOJ*. I have been provided with a copy of a note of the judgment on costs given on the 31st July 2017. I am grateful to…
THE JOB OF THE COURT IN CIVIL CASES: A USEFUL PRIMER: ADJUDICATION, THE BURDEN OF PROOF: THE JUDGE DOES NOT DECIDE WHO HAS THE MORAL HIGH GROUND
In Ball & Ors v Ball & Ors [2017] EWHC 1750 (Ch) HHJ Paul Matthews (sitting as a Judge of the High Court) set out clearly and succinctly the principles by which the civil courts determine cases. They serve as a…
“MUST” MEANS “MUST”: WHEN CRUCIAL PARTS OF YOUR EVIDENCE AMOUNTS TO NO MORE THAN GOSSIP AND RUMOUR IT CAN BE COSTLY.
I have already written that there are many reasons litigators should read the judgment of Lady Justice Thirwall in Marsh -v- Ministry of Justice [2017] EWHC 1040 (QB) (the subsequent judgment on costs is also worth reading and will be covered soon)….
A MATTER OF EVIDENCE AND A MATTER OF FACT: CLINICAL NEGLIGENCE ACTION WITH “AN OBVIOUS LACUNA IN THE DEFENDANT’S CASE”
Last year I wrote a series of posts about the seminal case of Whitehouse -v- Jordan. The aim was to point out that the essence of the decision was about findings of fact not legal principle. The House of Lords upheld…
FALSE EMAILS, METADATA AND CPR 32.19: A “PROCESS OF FALSIFICATION AND KNOWINGLY PUTTING FORWARD EVIDENCE THAT IS FALSE”
The case of 44 Wellfit Street Ltd v GMR Services Ltd [2017] EWHC 1841 (Ch) was described by Chris Dale as being “like one a much-expanded version of those old-style Finals questions with kitchen sink thrown in”. The judgment of Chief…
You must be logged in to post a comment.