Civil Litigation Brief ®
Menu
  • Home
  • About
  • Membership Plans
  • Webinars
  • Login
Updates and Commentary on Civil Procedure, by Gordon Exall, Barrister, Kings Chambers
Browse: Home » 2026 » January » 29
PART 36 IN THE PAST 12 MONTHS: WHAT PRACTITIONERS NEED TO KNOW: WEBINAR 26th FEBRUARY 2.00 pm (THREE TRACTORS, TWO FIELDS AND FAILING TO BEAT AN OFFER BY A "WHISKER")

PART 36 IN THE PAST 12 MONTHS: WHAT PRACTITIONERS NEED TO KNOW: WEBINAR 26th FEBRUARY 2.00 pm (THREE TRACTORS, TWO FIELDS AND FAILING TO BEAT AN OFFER BY A “WHISKER”)

January 29, 2026 · by gexall · in Applications, Avoiding negligence claims, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Part 36, Webinar

The past 12 months have seen some important cases about Part 36. Every civil litigator needs to keep up to date with these developments. This webinar looks at the cases and considers the practical implications for litigators. DATE AND TIME…

COST BITES 340:  CLAIMANTS' CONDUCT,  FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH PRE-ACTION PROTOCOL AND EFFECTIVE REFUSAL TO MEDIATE LEADS TO NO ORDER FOR COSTS

COST BITES 340: CLAIMANTS’ CONDUCT, FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH PRE-ACTION PROTOCOL AND EFFECTIVE REFUSAL TO MEDIATE LEADS TO NO ORDER FOR COSTS

January 29, 2026 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil Procedure, Conduct, Costs, Mediation & ADR, Members Content

Here we have a case where the claimants were (largely) successful but the court made no order for costs between the parties. There were three major factors (i) the way in which the claimants conducted the action; (ii) the failure…

PROVING THINGS 277: FARMER'S WIDOW HAD SUFFERED A LOSS OF £55,000 A YEAR EVEN THOUGH THE FARM WAS NOT MAKING A PROFIT: AN IMPORTANT ELEMENT OF FATAL ACCIDENT DAMAGES CONSIDERED AND APPLIED

PROVING THINGS 277: FARMER’S WIDOW HAD SUFFERED A LOSS OF £55,000 A YEAR EVEN THOUGH THE FARM WAS NOT MAKING A PROFIT: AN IMPORTANT ELEMENT OF FATAL ACCIDENT DAMAGES CONSIDERED AND APPLIED

January 29, 2026 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Damages, Fatal Accidents, Members Content

Here we have an interesting example of the application of one of the important principles of Fatal Accident Act damages. When the deceased person was running a business, the business may continue to operate after the death. However the dependants…

WITNESS EVIDENCE WEDNESDAY: HOW DOES THE COURT APPROACH EVIDENCE OF SOMETHING THAT HAPPENED OVER FOUR YEARS BEFORE AND TOOK PLACE WITHIN TWO MINUTES?

WITNESS EVIDENCE WEDNESDAY: HOW DOES THE COURT APPROACH EVIDENCE OF SOMETHING THAT HAPPENED OVER FOUR YEARS BEFORE AND TOOK PLACE WITHIN TWO MINUTES?

January 29, 2026 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Witness statements

This series enables us to look at witness evidence in many different contexts. Here we look at evidence relating to an arrest and events that took place within two minutes.  The judge was well aware of the issues that could…

EXPERT WATCH 32: A REVIEW OF THE CASE LAW AS TO THE INDEPENDENCE (OR OTHERWISE) OF EXPERT WITNESSES

EXPERT WATCH 32: A REVIEW OF THE CASE LAW AS TO THE INDEPENDENCE (OR OTHERWISE) OF EXPERT WITNESSES

January 29, 2026 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Credibility of experts, Expert evidence, Experts, Members Content

We are looking again at a case looked at yesterday. This is because the judgment contained a useful summary of many leading cases relating to the question of expert bias, or apparent bias. “It is always desirable that an expert…

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email. Subscription notifies you of a new post, it does not give you access to members' content.

Join 12.3K other subscribers

Recent Posts

  • WHAT HAS CIVIL LITIGATION BRIEF DONE ABOUT … PROVING DAMAGES: 10 KEY POINTS AND LOTS OF RELEVANT LINKS
  • THROWBACK FRIDAY: “PROVING THINGS BY EVIDENCE: SUCH A QUAINT, OLD FASHIONED CONCEPT” (OCTOBER 2015)
  • EXPERT WATCH 74: “HE EFFECTIVELY ASSUMED AN IMPERMISSIBLE ROLE PROMOTING A PROSECUTION CASE”: EXPERT AND PROSECUTORIAL MISCONDUCT LEAD TO CONVICTIONS BEING QUASHED
  • COST BITES 459 : A DEFENDANT TO COMMITTAL PROCEEDINGS CAN RECOVER COSTS OVER AND ABOVE CRIMINAL LEGAL AID RATES: COURT OF APPEAL DECISION
  • THE CHANCERY DIVISION IS NO MORE: A PRACTICE NOTE FROM THE CHANCELLOR OF THE HIGH COURT

Top Posts

SUPREME COURT PRACTICE DIRECTIONS AMENDED: REPLIES TO OBJECTIONS, BUNDLES, COURT DRESS AND DRAFT ORDERS: WHAT THIS MEANS IN PRACTICE
BACK TO BASICS MONDAY: DOCUMENTS ARE ADMISSIBLE WHEN THEY ARE IN AN AGREED TRIAL OR APPLICATION BUNDLE BUT...
EXPERT WATCH 73: AN "AD HOMINEM ATTACK" ON A PARTY'S EXPERT FAILS TO IMPRESS THE JUDGE
THE CHANCERY DIVISION IS NO MORE: A PRACTICE NOTE FROM THE CHANCELLOR OF THE HIGH COURT
INTERIM PAYMENTS: THE EXISTENCE OF DISPUTED DEFENCES AND COUNTERCLAIMS DID NOT PREVENT AN AWARD OF £1.4 MILLION

Archives

Blogroll

  • Fatal Accident Law
  • Legal Futures
  • Personal injury: Liability and Damages

Books

  • Munkman & Exall on Damages for Personal Injuries and Death 15th ed
  • The APIL Guide to Fatal Accidents 4th edition

Useful Links

  • Buntools (for preparing PDF Bundles)
  • Kings Chambers
  • Kings Chambers Costs & Litigation Funding
  • Kings Chambers Serious Injury
  • The Civil Procedure Rules
  • The Law Society Gazette
  • The National Archives Recently Published Judgments
  • The Senior Court Costs Office Guide 2025
  • www.Bailii.org

Copyright

© Gordon Exall, Exall Legal Training, Civil Litigation Brief, 2013-2026. Unauthorised use and or duplication of the material contained on this blog without permission is strictly prohibited.
Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.

To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
  • Membership Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Advertising Policy
  • Copyright
  • Legal Disclaimer

Copyright © 2026 Civil Litigation Brief ®

Powered by Big Yellow Workshop

Loading Comments...

You must be logged in to post a comment.