RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS REFUSED AFTER CLAIMANT FAILS TO COMPLY WITH PEREMPTORY ORDER FOR DISCLOSURE: “THE CONSEQUENCE IS THAT THE PROCEEDINGS ARE STRUCK OUT”

Here we look at the "second half" of the decision considered in the previous post.  Having rejected the claimant's submissions that breaches of a peremptory order should be considered under CPR 3.10 the judge then went on to consider the application for relief from sanctions under CPR 3.9.   Things ...

Enjoying this post?

Become a Civil Litigation Brief member to read full articles and access all premium content.

Become a member

Already a member? Log in below