Civil Litigation Brief ®
Menu
  • Home
  • About
  • Membership Plans
  • Webinars
  • Login
Updates and Commentary on Civil Procedure, by Gordon Exall, Barrister, Kings Chambers
Browse: Home » gexall » Page 111
INSTRUCTING EXPERTS: FAILURE TO HAVE CLEAR IDENTIFICATION OF ISSUES COMPOUNDS THE PROBLEMS

INSTRUCTING EXPERTS: FAILURE TO HAVE CLEAR IDENTIFICATION OF ISSUES COMPOUNDS THE PROBLEMS

June 22, 2017 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Expert evidence, Experts, Members Content

In Astex Therapeutics Limited -v- Astranzenca AB [2017] EWHC 1442 (Ch) Mr Justice Arnold considered lengthy and complex issues in relation to compounds. However even in a case of such complexity the evidence of the experts should have been more…

ABSENT WITNESSES DO NOT LEAD TO ADVERSE INFERENCES: ARGUMENT WOULD LEAD TO NEW "COSTS AND TERROR" IN LITIGATION

ABSENT WITNESSES DO NOT LEAD TO ADVERSE INFERENCES: ARGUMENT WOULD LEAD TO NEW “COSTS AND TERROR” IN LITIGATION

June 21, 2017 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Members Content, Witness statements

In Astex Therapeutics Limited -v- Astranzenca AB [2017] EWHC 1442 (Ch) Mr Justice Arnold considered, and robustly dismissed, an argument that the court should draw adverse inferences from absent witnesses. “I find it extraordinary that it can be suggested that…

COSTS BUDGETING AND THE FINAL BILL: HARRISON IN THE COURT OF APPEAL

June 21, 2017 · by gexall · in Appeals, Costs, Costs budgeting, Members Content

How definitive is a costs budget when it comes to detailed assessment? That is an issue that has been troubling the courts now for a few years.  The judgment of the Court of Appeal  today in Harrison -v- University Hospitals…

SUMMARY JUDGMENT FOR THE DEFENDANT IN A FATAL ACCIDENT CASE: DODD -V- RAEBARN IN THE COURT OF APPEAL

SUMMARY JUDGMENT FOR THE DEFENDANT IN A FATAL ACCIDENT CASE: DODD -V- RAEBARN IN THE COURT OF APPEAL

June 21, 2017 · by gexall · in Appeals, Members Content, Summary judgment

I am grateful to my colleague Colm Nugent for supplying me with a copy of the judgment in Dodd -v- Raeburn [2017] EWCA Civ 439 *given today the Court of Appeal upheld an order giving summary judgment in a fatal…

ADVERSE INFERENCES FROM ABSENT WITNESSES: ANOTHER EXAMPLE IN THE HIGH COURT

ADVERSE INFERENCES FROM ABSENT WITNESSES: ANOTHER EXAMPLE IN THE HIGH COURT

June 20, 2017 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Members Content, Witness statements

In NRC Holding Limited -v- Danilitskiy [2017] EWHC 1431 (Ch) Robin Dicker QC, sitting as a High Court judge, considered the inferences that should be drawn when a key individual did not give evidence. THE CASE The claimant had a…

WITNESS SUMMONS AGAINST SOLICITOR NOT SET ASIDE: BUT BE THERE AT 2.00 pm (AND BRING YOUR FILES)

WITNESS SUMMONS AGAINST SOLICITOR NOT SET ASIDE: BUT BE THERE AT 2.00 pm (AND BRING YOUR FILES)

June 20, 2017 · by gexall · in Applications, Members Content, Witness statements

In Morris -v- Hatch [2017] EWHC 1448 (Ch) HHJ Paul Matthews (sitting as a judge of the High Court) refused to set aside a witness summons issued against a solicitor. “… it is the civic duty of each of us,…

GLADWIN & SANCTIONS - AN ANALYSIS 3: AN ADJOURNMENT SHOULD NOT HAVE BEEN GRANTED:  A BLAMELESS CLIENT IS NOT A GET OUT OF JAIL FREE CARD

GLADWIN & SANCTIONS – AN ANALYSIS 3: AN ADJOURNMENT SHOULD NOT HAVE BEEN GRANTED: A BLAMELESS CLIENT IS NOT A GET OUT OF JAIL FREE CARD

June 20, 2017 · by gexall · in Adjournments, Appeals, Applications, Members Content, Relief from sanctions

In Gladwin -v- Bogescu [2017] EWHC 1287 (QB) Mr Justice Turner overturned an order giving the claimant relief from sanctions following late service of the witness statement. In the third of the series looking at the case more closely we…

GET £15,000 FOR YOUR COSTS PAY £20,000 IN COSTS: CONDITIONAL FEE AGREEMENT UNFAIR AND UNREASONABLE AND WAS SET ASIDE

GET £15,000 FOR YOUR COSTS PAY £20,000 IN COSTS: CONDITIONAL FEE AGREEMENT UNFAIR AND UNREASONABLE AND WAS SET ASIDE

June 19, 2017 · by gexall · in Conditional Fee Agreements, Conduct, Costs, Members Content

In Vilvarajah -v- West London Law Limited [2017] EWHC B23 (Costs) Master Gordon Saker declared a conditional fee agreement unreasonable and set it aside. The history and circumstances of this action make for interesting reading. “There is no correspondence between…

NON-PARTY COSTS ORDER MADE AGAINST CAR HIRE FIRM: ANOTHER SKIRMISH IN A FORENSIC WAR

NON-PARTY COSTS ORDER MADE AGAINST CAR HIRE FIRM: ANOTHER SKIRMISH IN A FORENSIC WAR

June 19, 2017 · by gexall · in Appeals, Costs, Members Content, Third party funding

The opening words of Mr Justice Turner’s judgment in Select Car Rentals (North West) Limited -v- Esure Services Limited [2017] EWHC 1434 (QB) contain an undeniable truth. The judge was upholding a decision to award costs against a car hire…

APPEAL AGAINST REFUSAL TO ALLOW LATE WITNESS STATEMENTS AT TRIAL: CLAIMANT'S APPEAL DISMISSED

APPEAL AGAINST REFUSAL TO ALLOW LATE WITNESS STATEMENTS AT TRIAL: CLAIMANT’S APPEAL DISMISSED

June 19, 2017 · by gexall · in Adjournments, Appeals, Applications, Members Content, Relief from sanctions, Witness statements

There are a surprising number of cases and appeals in relation to late service of witness evidence. In Byrne -v- Mullan [2017] EWHC 1387 (Ch) the claimant made an application to adduce new witness evidence which was heard on the…

GLADWIN & SANCTIONS - AN ANALYSIS 2: WHY (IN THEORY) THE DEFAULTING CLAIMANT COULD STILL RELY ON THE LATE WITNESS EVIDENCE

GLADWIN & SANCTIONS – AN ANALYSIS 2: WHY (IN THEORY) THE DEFAULTING CLAIMANT COULD STILL RELY ON THE LATE WITNESS EVIDENCE

June 19, 2017 · by gexall · in Adjournments, Members Content, Relief from sanctions, Sanctions, Witness statements

In Gladwin -v- Bogescu [2017] EWHC 1287 (QB) Mr Justice Turner overturned an order giving the claimant relief from sanctions following late service of the witness statement. In the second of the series looking at the case more closely we…

LINKS TO CASES ON THIS SITE: A BRIEF GUIDE

LINKS TO CASES ON THIS SITE: A BRIEF GUIDE

June 15, 2017 · by gexall · in Members Content, Useful links

It was only after an email exchange today that I realised some people do not realise that there are often links on this site to the cases that are being discussed.   LINKS AND HOW TO FIND THEM When a…

SETTING ASIDE DISCONTINUANCE AND DISAPPLYING QOCS: A HIGH COURT DECISION

SETTING ASIDE DISCONTINUANCE AND DISAPPLYING QOCS: A HIGH COURT DECISION

June 15, 2017 · by gexall · in Applications, Costs, Members Content, QOCS

In Shaw -v- Medtronic [2017] EWHC 1397 (QB) Mr Justice Lavender considered issues relating to the setting aside of notices of discontinuance and disapplying QOCS. He declined to set aside a notice of discontinuance or give permission to enforce costs…

GLADWIN & SANCTIONS - AN ANALYSIS 1: WHAT WENT WRONG

GLADWIN & SANCTIONS – AN ANALYSIS 1: WHAT WENT WRONG

June 14, 2017 · by gexall · in Members Content, Relief from sanctions, Sanctions, Witness statements

In Gladwin -v- Bogescu [2017] EWHC 1287 (QB) Mr Justice Turner overturned an order giving the claimant relief from sanctions following late service of the witness statement. In a series looking at the case more closely we look at what…

"THE DOG ATE MY COURTWORK": REASONS, EXCUSES AND EXPLANATIONS IN APPLICATIONS FOR RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS

“THE DOG ATE MY COURTWORK”: REASONS, EXCUSES AND EXPLANATIONS IN APPLICATIONS FOR RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS

June 14, 2017 · by gexall · in Applications, Members Content, Relief from sanctions

 One thing that the the Denton decision did, without doubt*, was to put an end to the “mandatory” requirement for a “good reason” to explain a breach when applying for relief from sanctions.   However it is always incumbent upon…

SKELETON ARGUMENTS  TOO LONG & AMOUNT OF DOCUMENTS "ABSURD": A JUSTIFIABLE JUDICIAL COMPLAINT

SKELETON ARGUMENTS TOO LONG & AMOUNT OF DOCUMENTS “ABSURD”: A JUSTIFIABLE JUDICIAL COMPLAINT

June 13, 2017 · by gexall · in Applications, Bundles, Members Content, Written advocacy

In ICAP Management Services Limited -v- Berry [2017] EWHC 1321 (QB) Mr Justice Garnham added his voice to those judges who have protested about the length of skeleton arguments and written submissions and the burden of unnecessary documents. “It is…

NO PLAYING OF THE ADVANTAGE RULE IN CIVIL LITIGATION: LATE WITNESS STATEMENTS LEAD TO CLAIMANT'S CASE BEING SENT OFF: GOOD TRY BUT NO TRIAL

NO PLAYING OF THE ADVANTAGE RULE IN CIVIL LITIGATION: LATE WITNESS STATEMENTS LEAD TO CLAIMANT’S CASE BEING SENT OFF: GOOD TRY BUT NO TRIAL

June 12, 2017 · by gexall · in Appeals, Applications, Members Content, Relief from sanctions, Sanctions, Witness statements

In Gladwin -v- Bogescu [2017] EWHC 1287 (QB) Mr Justice Turner uses the English language to its full effect when ruling that a claimant who served a witness statement late should not have been granted relief from sanctions. The case…

STOP USING PROCEDURE TO BULLY  VULNERABLE PEOPLE:  HM REVENUE & CUSTOMS TOLD TO READ DENTON PROPERLY

STOP USING PROCEDURE TO BULLY VULNERABLE PEOPLE: HM REVENUE & CUSTOMS TOLD TO READ DENTON PROPERLY

June 11, 2017 · by gexall · in Applications, Members Content, Relief from sanctions

I have no intention of taking this blog into areas of taxation and customs and excise. However the judgment of the First-tier Tribunal (Tax) in E -v- The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs [2017] UKFTT 348 (TCC) contains…

A NUMBER OF  CHALLENGES TO THE ENFORCEABILITY OF  A DAMAGES BASED AGREEMENT: MASTER MAKES ORDER FOR A SPLIT TRIAL

A NUMBER OF CHALLENGES TO THE ENFORCEABILITY OF A DAMAGES BASED AGREEMENT: MASTER MAKES ORDER FOR A SPLIT TRIAL

June 11, 2017 · by gexall · in Applications, Costs, Members Content

In Lexlaw Ltd -v- Zuberi [2017] EWHC 1350 (Ch) Master Clark considered challenges to the validity of a damages based agreement between solicitor and client. It was decided that the question of the enforceability  of the agreement should be tried…

SETTING JUDGMENT ASIDE AFTER REDBOURN: 10 KEY POINTS FOR DEFENDANTS (CLAIMANTS MUST READ TOO)

SETTING JUDGMENT ASIDE AFTER REDBOURN: 10 KEY POINTS FOR DEFENDANTS (CLAIMANTS MUST READ TOO)

June 9, 2017 · by gexall · in Applications, Default judgment,, Members Content, Setting aside judgment

The judgment in Redbourn Group Ltd -v- Fairgate Development Limited [2017] EWHC 1223 (TCC) highlights the fact that there is a new age for a party seeking to set judgment aside. Not only does the party have to satisfy the requirements of…

DEFERMENT OF PAYMENT OF COSTS NOT PERMITTED: RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS REFUSED: 7 DAYS LATE WAS "SERIOUS AND SIGNIFICANT"

DEFERMENT OF PAYMENT OF COSTS NOT PERMITTED: RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS REFUSED: 7 DAYS LATE WAS “SERIOUS AND SIGNIFICANT”

June 7, 2017 · by gexall · in Applications, Costs, Members Content, Relief from sanctions

In The Queen on the application of Bhandal -v- HM Revenue and Customs [2016] EWHC 3387 (Admin) Mr Justice Holroyde dismissed an application deferment of an order to pay costs and an application for relief from sanctions in making the…

LITIGANT MAY HAVE LODGED APPEAL NOTICE ON TIME WHEN THE COURT CLOSED EARLY:  CLAIMANT GRANTED PERMISSION TO APPEAL

LITIGANT MAY HAVE LODGED APPEAL NOTICE ON TIME WHEN THE COURT CLOSED EARLY: CLAIMANT GRANTED PERMISSION TO APPEAL

June 7, 2017 · by gexall · in Appeals, Applications, Members Content

In Croke -v-Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government [2017] EWCA Civ 423 Lord Justice Hickinbottom found that it is arguable that that a litigant in person had complied with the strict six week time limit for appeals because…

DEFENDANT'S ADMISSION IS BINDING: BUT PERMISSION TO WITHDRAW ADMISSION GRANTED: HIGH COURT DECISION

DEFENDANT’S ADMISSION IS BINDING: BUT PERMISSION TO WITHDRAW ADMISSION GRANTED: HIGH COURT DECISION

June 7, 2017 · by gexall · in Admissions, Amendment, Applications, Members Content, RTA Protocol

In Blake -v- Croasdale [2017] EWHC 1336 (QB) His Honour Judge Purle QC (sitting as a Judge of the High Court) decided that an admission made by insurers was a binding admission. However he granted permission to resile from that…

WHY YOU SHOULD NEVER JUDGE A BOOK BY ITS COVER: THE UNDERWOOD TRILOGY

WHY YOU SHOULD NEVER JUDGE A BOOK BY ITS COVER: THE UNDERWOOD TRILOGY

June 6, 2017 · by gexall · in Assessment of Costs, Book Review, Case Management, Civil Procedure, Costs, Members Content

There are three volumes in Kerry Underwood’s guide to “Kerry on Personal Injury Small Claims Portals and Fixed costs”. Each has Kerry’s photo on the front. Should that put you off? As ever I have a “quick” review and a…

WISEMAN -V- MARSTON: COURT FEES CASE: TRANSCRIPT NOW AVAILABLE

WISEMAN -V- MARSTON: COURT FEES CASE: TRANSCRIPT NOW AVAILABLE

June 6, 2017 · by gexall · in Appeals, Applications, Court fees, Members Content, Striking out

The transcript of the judgment in the Wiseman -v- Marston case is now available. I have included it as an attachment to the previous posts on the case. The links are also available here. THE JUDGMENT AND COURT OF APPEAL…

AGREEING EXTENSIONS OF TIME: REFUSAL TO AGREE CONTRARY TO THE OVERRIDING OBJECTIVE HAS CONSEQUENCES IN COSTS

AGREEING EXTENSIONS OF TIME: REFUSAL TO AGREE CONTRARY TO THE OVERRIDING OBJECTIVE HAS CONSEQUENCES IN COSTS

June 5, 2017 · by gexall · in Applications, Costs, Extensions of time, Members Content

When should a party agree an extension of time? In Emmanuel -v- The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs [2017]  EWHC 1253 (Ch)  Her Honour Judge Karen Walden Smith made some telling observations . “… in my judgment the…

LIES, DAMN LIES AND LITIGATION: WHY PEOPLE TELL LIES AND WHAT DOES THE JUDGE DO?

LIES, DAMN LIES AND LITIGATION: WHY PEOPLE TELL LIES AND WHAT DOES THE JUDGE DO?

June 4, 2017 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Members Content, Witness statements

Litigation is not always about  lies or liars. Often it is about misunderstandings, mistaken recollection and people convincing themselves that they are correct.  However in litigation, as in life, people do tell lies. Litigators need to know about lies, and…

PROVING THINGS 63: LAW SOCIETY FAILS TO PROVE IT MAKES A LOSS: "DISAPPOINTING, TO SAY THE LEAST"

PROVING THINGS 63: LAW SOCIETY FAILS TO PROVE IT MAKES A LOSS: “DISAPPOINTING, TO SAY THE LEAST”

June 2, 2017 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Disclosure, Education, Members Content

The Law Society put forward a budget of £637,000* to defend the action in Socrates Training Limited -v- The Law Society of England and Wales [2017] CAT 10.  The Law Society, however suffered from a basic failure to prove one…

TALES FROM THE APIL CONFERENCE V: COURT FEE REMISSION:  USEFUL LINKS

TALES FROM THE APIL CONFERENCE V: COURT FEE REMISSION: USEFUL LINKS

June 1, 2017 · by gexall · in Costs, Court fees, Members Content

I attended the session on court fees. One part of this related to the increasing importance of court fee remissions.  Claimants have to know the rules and, before they pay any fee, be certain that their client is eligible. Sometimes…

PROVING THINGS 62: "TOTALLY UNSATISFACTORY" EVIDENCE AT TRIAL FAILS TO PROVE SPECIAL DAMAGES

PROVING THINGS 62: “TOTALLY UNSATISFACTORY” EVIDENCE AT TRIAL FAILS TO PROVE SPECIAL DAMAGES

May 31, 2017 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Damages, Members Content, Schedules, Witness statements

I wrote about the judgment in Stewart & Chergui -v- The Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis [2017] EWHC 921 (QB), yesterday. There is no harm in repeating one element of that post in this series.  I am repeating it because…

WISEMAN -V- MARSTON: THE UNDERPAYMENT OF COURT FEES:  DEFENDANT'S APPLICATION FOR PERMISSION TO APPEAL REFUSED

WISEMAN -V- MARSTON: THE UNDERPAYMENT OF COURT FEES: DEFENDANT’S APPLICATION FOR PERMISSION TO APPEAL REFUSED

May 31, 2017 · by gexall · in Appeals, Court fees, Members Content, Striking out

In December last year I reported on the decision in Wiseman -v- Marston’s PLC (Sheffield County Court 21st December 2016). His Honour Judge Robinson allowed the claimant’s appeal in a case relating to payment of court fees. The defendant applied for…

COSTS AT THE END OF THE CASE - WHO IS THE REAL WINNER? (AND MORE ABOUT FAILING TO PROVE DAMAGES)

COSTS AT THE END OF THE CASE – WHO IS THE REAL WINNER? (AND MORE ABOUT FAILING TO PROVE DAMAGES)

May 30, 2017 · by gexall · in Assessment of Costs, Civil evidence, Costs, Damages, Members Content

It is uncertain how much a three week jury trial in the High Court will cost.  It is certain that it costs a great deal more than the awards of £5,400 and £5,700 Mrs Justice McGowan awarded to the claimants…

SETTING ASIDE JUDGMENT, DELAY AND DENTON: "PROMPTNESS" CONSIDERED: DELAY MUST BE EXPLAINED

SETTING ASIDE JUDGMENT, DELAY AND DENTON: “PROMPTNESS” CONSIDERED: DELAY MUST BE EXPLAINED

May 29, 2017 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil Procedure, Default judgment,, Members Content, Relief from sanctions, Setting aside judgment

In Redbourn Group Ltd -v- Fairgate Development Limited [2017] EWHC 1223 (TCC) Mr Justice Coulson refused to set aside a default judgment.  The case contains some important discussion on how the Denton principles apply to applications to set aside judgment. “……

LATE SERVICE OF APPLICATIONS, INACCURATE TIME ESTIMATES  AND THE PRESUMPTIONS THE JUDGE SHOULD DRAW

LATE SERVICE OF APPLICATIONS, INACCURATE TIME ESTIMATES AND THE PRESUMPTIONS THE JUDGE SHOULD DRAW

May 29, 2017 · by gexall · in Applications, Case Management, Injunctions, Members Content

In Capita PLC -v- Darch [2017] EWHC 1248 (Ch) Richard Spearman QC highlighted some of the procedural issues that can arise when applications are served late and with insufficient time estimates.   A failure to serve promptly did not, ultimately,…

EXPERTS AND EVIDENCE: WHEN THE CASE GETS PIECED TOGETHER ON THE EVE OF THE TRIAL

EXPERTS AND EVIDENCE: WHEN THE CASE GETS PIECED TOGETHER ON THE EVE OF THE TRIAL

May 26, 2017 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Clinical Negligence, Disclosure, Expert evidence, Experts, Members Content

In the course of a very detailed judgment today  in a clinical negligence case Mr Justice Langstaff made some important observations about expert evidence. He observed that late evidence may lead to costs consequences. Given that the whole rationale of…

CLIFF, THE BBC AND PART 18 OF THE CPR: "WE DON'T TALK ANY MORE"

CLIFF, THE BBC AND PART 18 OF THE CPR: “WE DON’T TALK ANY MORE”

May 26, 2017 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content

In Sir Cliff Richard OBE -v- The British Broadcasting Corporation [2017] EWHC 1291 (Ch) Mr Justice Mann considered an issue of whether the BBC should answer Part 18 questions. It is unusual for one Part 18 question to be the…

DEALING WITH BEREAVED  CLIENTS: A DEFICIT IN LEGAL TRAINING?

DEALING WITH BEREAVED CLIENTS: A DEFICIT IN LEGAL TRAINING?

May 26, 2017 · by gexall · in Fatal Accidents, Members Content, Useful links

I was lecturing yesterday alongside an oncologist.  He has a difficult job.  On a regular (sometimes daily) basis he has to tell patients whether they can be treated, how long they “have left” and whether treatment is worthwhile. This left…

CHANGING FROM LEGAL AID TO CFA: THE COURT OF APPEAL DECISION

CHANGING FROM LEGAL AID TO CFA: THE COURT OF APPEAL DECISION

May 25, 2017 · by gexall · in Costs, Members Content

This blog has followed the cases that arose out of decisions to switch from public funding to legal aid. In Hyde -v- Milton Keynes NHS Foundation Trust [2017] EWCA Civ 399 the Court of Appeal has given a judgment that…

BOOK  REVIEW: AN INTRODUCTION TO PERSONAL INJURY LAW

BOOK REVIEW: AN INTRODUCTION TO PERSONAL INJURY LAW

May 25, 2017 · by gexall · in Book Review, Members Content, Personal Injury

I reviewed David Boyle’s book on expert evidence earlier in the year. He has presumably decided to forego all forms of social interaction and has now written a general introduction to Personal Injury.  The book places some emphasis on the…

LIES, DAMN LIES AND CAR HIRE QUOTES: COMPUTER RECORDS, AND INTERNAL DOCUMENTS PREFERRED TO WITNESS EVIDENCE

LIES, DAMN LIES AND CAR HIRE QUOTES: COMPUTER RECORDS, AND INTERNAL DOCUMENTS PREFERRED TO WITNESS EVIDENCE

May 24, 2017 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Committal proceedings, Disclosure, Members Content, Witness statements

The judgment in Accident Exchange Limited -v- Broom [2017] EWHC 1096 (Admin) shows a deliberate, and concerted, effort to undermine the civil justice process. It also shows the importance of obtaining computer records, and internal documentation when preparing a trial….

DAMAGES, COSTS AND MEDIATION: COURT OF APPEAL CONSIDERS THE BOUNDARIES

DAMAGES, COSTS AND MEDIATION: COURT OF APPEAL CONSIDERS THE BOUNDARIES

May 24, 2017 · by gexall · in Appeals, Damages, Interest, Mediation, Mediation & ADR, Members Content

In  the judgment today Gore -v- Naheed [2017] EWCA 369 the Court of Appeal considered the issue of damages being awarded (when they had not been claimed) and where costs should lie when a party – reasonably – declined to…

AMENDMENT, PLEADINGS,  NEARLY OPPRESSIVE CONDUCT AND PROLIX WITNESS STATEMENTS: MASTER ISSUES AN EARLY WARNING

AMENDMENT, PLEADINGS, NEARLY OPPRESSIVE CONDUCT AND PROLIX WITNESS STATEMENTS: MASTER ISSUES AN EARLY WARNING

May 24, 2017 · by gexall · in Amendment, Applications, Members Content, Statements of Case, Witness statements

In Williers -v Joyce [2017] EWHC 1225 (Ch) Chief Master Marsh issued a number of warnings in relation to procedural issues.  Amendment, conduct, pleadings, disclosure and witness statements are considered. (The judgment also contains a full copy of the re-amended…

EXTRAORDINARY AMOUNT OF COSTS CAUSES JUDGE GREAT CONCERN: RBS COSTS ESTIMATES GREATLY EXCEEDED - NOW £129 MILLION

EXTRAORDINARY AMOUNT OF COSTS CAUSES JUDGE GREAT CONCERN: RBS COSTS ESTIMATES GREATLY EXCEEDED – NOW £129 MILLION

May 23, 2017 · by gexall · in Assessment of Costs, Costs, Members Content, Proportionality

The RBS Rights Issue Litigation is clearly a major and unusual case.  However costs have to be reasonable and proportionate even (and perhaps especially) in this type of litigation. This is made clear in the judgment of Mr Justice Hildyard…

A CLAIMANT CAN SUE AN UNNAMED DRIVER (AND THE INSURER HAS TO PAY): COURT OF APPEAL DECISION TODAY

A CLAIMANT CAN SUE AN UNNAMED DRIVER (AND THE INSURER HAS TO PAY): COURT OF APPEAL DECISION TODAY

May 23, 2017 · by gexall · in Amendment, Appeals, Applications, Insurance, Judgment, Members Content, Parties to actions

NB THIS DECISION WAS OVERTURNED BY THE SUPREME COURT IN Cameron v Liverpool Victoria Insurance Co Ltd [2019] UKSC 6 t In Cameron -v- Hussain [2017] EWCA Civ 366 the Court of Appeal (by a majority) considered the question whether a claimant…

APPEALS, TIME, SERVICE, VENUE: A REAL PROCEDURAL HOTCHPOTCH - EVEN BEFORE THE MAIN ISSUE IS CONSIDERED

APPEALS, TIME, SERVICE, VENUE: A REAL PROCEDURAL HOTCHPOTCH – EVEN BEFORE THE MAIN ISSUE IS CONSIDERED

May 23, 2017 · by gexall · in Appeals, Applications, Members Content, Relief from sanctions, Serving documents

The judgment of Mr Justice Jay in Enniful -v- Motor Insurers Bureau [2017] EWHC 1086 (QB) is a procedural hotchpotch. It relates to service, delay, dates of compliance, venue for appeals and relief from sanctions. All of this occurred before…

TALES FROM THE APIL CONFERENCE IV: HOW PROCEDURAL CHANGES CAN MAKE A DIFFERENCE IN THE REAL WORLD

TALES FROM THE APIL CONFERENCE IV: HOW PROCEDURAL CHANGES CAN MAKE A DIFFERENCE IN THE REAL WORLD

May 22, 2017 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content

This may have been a strange venue to be talking about intellectual property rights and civil procedure.  However it arose because Mr Justice Birss was on the panel and he has a background in intellectual property law. HOW CHANGES TO…

TALES FROM THE APIL CONFERENCE 3: WITNESS STATEMENTS: LITIGANTS IN PERSON ARE BETTER THAN LAWYERS

TALES FROM THE APIL CONFERENCE 3: WITNESS STATEMENTS: LITIGANTS IN PERSON ARE BETTER THAN LAWYERS

May 22, 2017 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Courses, Members Content, Witness statements

I attended the APIL conference because I was asked to talk about “proving things”, that is the basic task of establishing a case by evidence. The fact that this blog has a long-running series on this issue may have played…

TALES FROM THE APIL CONFERENCE II: THE ONGOING DEBATE ABOUT COURT FEES

TALES FROM THE APIL CONFERENCE II: THE ONGOING DEBATE ABOUT COURT FEES

May 22, 2017 · by gexall · in Court fees, Members Content, Relief from sanctions

Whilst at the conference I attended a session on court fees. The defendant in the case of Wiseman -v- Martins PLC  has sought permission to appeal and there remains a degree of uncertainty in relation to these issues. However there…

TALES FROM THE APIL CONFERENCE I: TO AVOID "AGREEMENT" OF COSTS BUDGETS BY DEFAULT READ DIRECTIONS FOR THE CCMC WITH CONSIDERABLE CARE

TALES FROM THE APIL CONFERENCE I: TO AVOID “AGREEMENT” OF COSTS BUDGETS BY DEFAULT READ DIRECTIONS FOR THE CCMC WITH CONSIDERABLE CARE

May 21, 2017 · by gexall · in Applications, Assessment of Costs, Costs, Costs budgeting, Members Content

I am doing a series of posts on matters arising from the APIL annual conference.  I am not aiming to cover all the issues and matters raised.  People can (and should) read the Presidents speech .   Given the nature of…

SERVICE OF DOCUMENTS II: SERVING AT AN ADDRESS THAT HAD BEEN VACATED (AND OVERTURNING FINDINGS OF FACT)

SERVICE OF DOCUMENTS II: SERVING AT AN ADDRESS THAT HAD BEEN VACATED (AND OVERTURNING FINDINGS OF FACT)

May 21, 2017 · by gexall · in Appeals, Members Content, Serving documents

In Grimes -v- The Trustees of the Essex Farmers and Union Hunt [2017] EWCA Civ 361 is another one of the batch of recent cases on service. The Court of Appeal considered the question of whether a document could be…

← Previous 1 … 110 111 112 … 146 Next →

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email. Subscription notifies you of a new post, it does not give you access to members' content.

Join 12.3K other subscribers

Recent Posts

  • COST BITES 409: A PART 36 CASE TO FINISH OFF THE WEEK: CLAIM £8.4 MILLION GET £102,000 (HAVING TURNED DOWN AN OFFER OF £3.175 MILLION): IT IS NOT “UNJUST” FOR THE CLAIMANT TO FACE TO NORMAL PART 36 CONSEQUENCES, NOR WOULD THE COURT “PICK AND CHOOSE” IN RELATION TO THE COSTS PAYABLE
  • COST BITES 408: WHO (IF ANYONE) SHOULD PAY THE COSTS WHEN THE COURT MAKES NO DECISION ON THE SUBSTANTIVE ISSUE?
  • THROWBACK FRIDAY: “WHICH WITNESS WILL BE BELIEVED? IS IT ALL A LOTTERY? (JULY 2014): ISSUES OF WITNESS CREDIBILITY CONSIDERED
  • EXPERT WATCH 54 : THE DEPUTY MASTER SHOULD NOT HAVE IGNORED THE EXPERT EVIDENCE BEFORE THE COURT: IT WAS RELEVANT AND ADDRESSED THE CENTRAL ISSUE
  • A SOLICITOR SHOULD JUST NOT BE SAYING THIS IS IN A WITNESS STATEMENT: IT “STRAYED WELL BEYOND WHAT SHE COULD LEGALLY GIVE EVIDENCE ABOUT FROM HER OWN KNOWLEDGE INCLUDED HEARSAY FROM AN UNNAMED SOURCE AND INCLUDED STATEMENTS OF OPINION WHICH SHE DID NOT HAVE THE EXPERTISE TO GIVE…”

Top Posts

RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS: AS STRONGLY WORDED A REFUSAL AS I HAVE SEEN: THE CONCEPT "DOES NOT EMBODY A PRINCIPLE OF "BREACH NOW REPENT LATER"
A SOLICITOR SHOULD JUST NOT BE SAYING THIS IS IN A WITNESS STATEMENT: IT "STRAYED WELL BEYOND WHAT SHE COULD LEGALLY GIVE EVIDENCE ABOUT FROM HER OWN KNOWLEDGE INCLUDED HEARSAY FROM AN UNNAMED SOURCE AND INCLUDED STATEMENTS OF OPINION WHICH SHE DID NOT HAVE THE EXPERTISE TO GIVE..."
THE ONLINE PROCEDURE (RULES AND PRACTICE DIRECTIONS) RULES 2026 COME INTO FORCE ON THE 7th SEPTEMBER: HERE IS A SUMMARY (AND THE RULES THEMSLVES)
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND LITIGATION: AN UPDATE ON CONSULTATION FINDINGS FROM THE CIVIL JUSTICE COUNCIL
WHERE THINGS WENT WRONG IN LITIGATION (AND STOPPING IT HAPPENING TO YOU) 2: ADVISING A CLIENT THAT THEY ARE NOT LIABLE FOR COSTS BECAUSE PROCEEDINGS HAVE NOT BEEN SERVED

Archives

Blogroll

  • Fatal Accident Law
  • Legal Futures
  • Personal injury: Liability and Damages

Books

  • Munkman & Exall on Damages for Personal Injuries and Death 15th ed
  • The APIL Guide to Fatal Accidents 4th edition

Useful Links

  • Buntools (for preparing PDF Bundles)
  • Kings Chambers
  • Kings Chambers Costs & Litigation Funding
  • Kings Chambers Serious Injury
  • The Civil Procedure Rules
  • The Law Society Gazette
  • The National Archives Recently Published Judgments
  • The Senior Court Costs Office Guide 2025
  • www.Bailii.org

Copyright

© Gordon Exall, Exall Legal Training, Civil Litigation Brief, 2013-2026. Unauthorised use and or duplication of the material contained on this blog without permission is strictly prohibited.
Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.

To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
  • Membership Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Advertising Policy
  • Copyright
  • Legal Disclaimer

Copyright © 2026 Civil Litigation Brief ®

Powered by Big Yellow Workshop

Loading Comments...

You must be logged in to post a comment.