Civil Litigation Brief
Menu
  • Home
  • About
  • Membership Plans
  • Webinars
  • Login
Updates and Commentary on Civil Procedure, by Gordon Exall, Barrister, Kings Chambers
Browse: Home » Applications » Page 25
COVID-19 and Remote Court Arrangements: 30 tips for dealing with Virtual Hearings: GUEST POST FROM ANDREW KING

COVID-19 and Remote Court Arrangements: 30 tips for dealing with Virtual Hearings: GUEST POST FROM ANDREW KING

April 15, 2020 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil Procedure, Coronavirus, Members Content, Remote hearings

I am grateful to Andrew King from Lennons solicitors for allowing me to reproduce his article on dealing with virtual hearings. This was based on Andrew’s experience of being involved in a three day remote trial.  As you can see…

MORE ON THE NEW STATEMENT OF TRUTH: CAN YOU CHANGE THE WORDING?

MORE ON THE NEW STATEMENT OF TRUTH: CAN YOU CHANGE THE WORDING?

April 11, 2020 · by gexall · in Applications, Avoiding negligence claims, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Statements of Case, Statements of Truth, Witness statements

I have had questions, from several sources, about whether it is possible to amend the “new form” of the  statement of truth when a document is not being signed by a party to litigation.   PRACTICE DIRECTION 22. The new…

DIVISIONAL COURT FINDS THAT EXPERT IN CONTEMPT OF COURT SHOULD HAVE BEEN ERASED FROM MEDICAL REGISTER: “NEW” EVIDENCE ADMITTED

April 8, 2020 · by gexall · in Appeals, Applications, Civil evidence, Expert evidence, Experts, Members Content

The judgment of the Divisional Court today in  General Medical Council & Ors v Zafar [2020] EWHC 846 (Admin) provides an interesting sequel to the earlier judgments in relation to contempt of court by a doctor who had been seriously…

THE ROYAL COURTS OF JUSTICE FEES OFFICE CLOSED: EMAIL ADDRESSES TO CONTACT

April 1, 2020 · by gexall · in Appeals, Applications, Coronavirus, Court fees, Members Content

A HCMTS notice states that the RCJ Fees Office is closed.  It gives appropriate email addresses. The Royal Courts of Justice Fees Office will close to the public until further notice (1 April 2020). Court users are advised to contact…

COURT FUNDS OFFICE WILL NOW ACCEPT ELECTRONIC PAYMENTS BY BACS DIRECT CREDIT.

COURT FUNDS OFFICE WILL NOW ACCEPT ELECTRONIC PAYMENTS BY BACS DIRECT CREDIT.

March 31, 2020 · by gexall · in Applications, Coronavirus, Members Content

I have had a tweet from John de Bono QC stating that the Courts Funds Office will now accept electronic payment by BACS Direct Credit. “Breaking news. I understand Court Funds Office will now accept electronic payments by BACS Direct…

MORE USEFUL GUIDANCE ON BUNDLES AND VIRTUAL HEARINGS

MORE USEFUL GUIDANCE ON BUNDLES AND VIRTUAL HEARINGS

March 28, 2020 · by gexall · in Applications, Bundles, Coronavirus, Members Content, Remote hearings, Useful links

Caselines has kindly sent me details of their very useful “COVID-19 Resource Hub”     TOPICS COVERED Pandemics, Privacy, and Confidential Data Security: Managing Information Risk is Critical Video: Introduction to a CaseLines Bundle Quick Reference Guide: From Invite to…

GUIDANCE IN DEVON AND CORNWALL: VACATION OF COURT HEARINGS AND RE-LISTING

March 27, 2020 · by gexall · in Adjournments, Applications, Coronavirus, Members Content, Remote hearings

The President of Plymouth Law Society has sent out the following guidance. COVID-19 – URGENT – CIVIL COURT HEARINGS TO BE VACATED – HHJ GORE QC Dear Member If you are a Civil Court user please read the notice below from…

INNOVATIVE APPROACH WHEN PROPOSED APPELLANT UNABLE TO ATTEND COURT

INNOVATIVE APPROACH WHEN PROPOSED APPELLANT UNABLE TO ATTEND COURT

March 27, 2020 · by gexall · in Appeals, Applications, Members Content, Remote hearings, Written advocacy

In  [2020] EWHC 735 (QB) Mrs Justice Tipples took an innovative approach to the problems caused by a claimant’s inability to attend court because of the coronavirus problems.  The submissions were made by email.   THE CASE The judge was…

REMOTE HEARING - WENT AHEAD AND WORKED

REMOTE HEARING – WENT AHEAD AND WORKED

March 27, 2020 · by gexall · in Applications, Coronavirus, Members Content, Remote hearings

In Jalla & Ors v Royal Dutch Shell Plc & Ors [2020] EWHC 738 (TCC) Mr Justice Stuart-Smith gave judgment in a hearing that was conducted remotely.  This demonstrates that, with considerable effort, remote hearings can work in complex hearings….

Virtual Settlement Meetings and Mediations: (Mediation when living a Cloistered life…)

March 26, 2020 · by gexall · in Applications, Coronavirus, Members Content, Remote hearings

Cloisters Chambers has produced a video Virtual Settlement Meetings and Mediations, available here. https://youtu.be/sd5qiWH-KPE   THE VIDEO There is a simulated virtual mediation. This is explained by the Cloisters’ team that produced it. “The attached guide is a record of our…

INFORMATION FOR QUEEN’S BENCH COURT USERS QUEEN’S BENCH MASTERS HEARINGS AND QB ACTION DEPARTMENT

INFORMATION FOR QUEEN’S BENCH COURT USERS QUEEN’S BENCH MASTERS HEARINGS AND QB ACTION DEPARTMENT

March 25, 2020 · by gexall · in Applications, Coronavirus, Members Content

Further guidance has been issued by the Queens’ Bench Division in relation to hearings before QB Masters. CORONAVIRUS BULLETIN 2 “In the light of the developments of the last 48 hours, the situation has changed from the communication sent out…

THE EXPLANATORY NOTES TO THE CORONAVIRUS BILL: LIVE LINKS IN COURT PROCEEDINGS

THE EXPLANATORY NOTES TO THE CORONAVIRUS BILL: LIVE LINKS IN COURT PROCEEDINGS

March 24, 2020 · by gexall · in Applications, Coronavirus, Members Content, Remote hearings

The explanatory notes to the Coronavirus Bill have a detailed explanation of the plans for the expansion of live links in court proceedings, particularly criminal proceedings. Clause 51 and Schedule 22 Expansion of availability of live links in criminal proceedings…

USEFUL GUIDANCE ON REMOTE HEARINGS: FROM START TO FINISH

USEFUL GUIDANCE ON REMOTE HEARINGS: FROM START TO FINISH

March 24, 2020 · by gexall · in Applications, Members Content, Remote hearings, Useful links

I am grateful to barristers  Rebecca Musgrove and   Iain Hutchinson who have sent me a copy (and permission to circulate) of their guide to remote hearings.  It provides step by step guidance (and photographs) to help those unfamilar with the…

CLOISTERS GUIDE TO MAKING VIRTUAL HEARINGS IN THE EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNAL WORK

March 23, 2020 · by gexall · in Applications, Coronavirus, Members Content

I am grateful to Chesca Lord from Cloisters for  pointing out and sending me a link to the post “Making virtual hearings in the Employment Tribunal work.”  This is available here. https://youtu.be/GnT9Deye7Ok VIDEO GUIDANCE This includes a 15 minute video…

WEBCAST GUIDES TO ONLINE COMMUNICATIONS AND HEARINGS - FROM ISHAN KOLHATKAR

WEBCAST GUIDES TO ONLINE COMMUNICATIONS AND HEARINGS – FROM ISHAN KOLHATKAR

March 23, 2020 · by gexall · in Applications, Coronavirus, Members Content

I made Ishan Kolhatkar Civil Litigation Brief “Lawyer of the Year” last year for the wonderful work he did on the Billable Hour cookbook.  Ish is a man of many talents.   He has now sent me links to the webcasts…

CLAIMANT BEATS OWN PART 36 OFFER: DEFENDANT ORDERED TO PAY INDEMNITY COSTS FOR AN EXTENDED PERIOD BECAUSE OF ITS CONDUCT

CLAIMANT BEATS OWN PART 36 OFFER: DEFENDANT ORDERED TO PAY INDEMNITY COSTS FOR AN EXTENDED PERIOD BECAUSE OF ITS CONDUCT

March 20, 2020 · by gexall · in Applications, Conduct, Costs, Members Content, Part 36

I am grateful to Sam Hayman from Bolt Burdon Kemp   for drawing my attention to the decision today of Mr Justice Griffiths in DSN v Blackpool Football Club Ltd [2020] EWHC 670 (QB).  The defendant was ordered to pay indemnity…

TELEPHONE APPLICATIONS: A BEGINNER'S GUIDE

TELEPHONE APPLICATIONS: A BEGINNER’S GUIDE

March 19, 2020 · by gexall · in Applications, Members Content

For many civil lawyers telephone hearings have been a part of litigation for some time.  Developments today, however, have left some in the profession scratching their heads.  Family lawyers in particular are asking about this mysteries of telephone hearings. Even…

HMCTS GUIDANCE: CLOSURE OF COUNTERS IN THE QBD AND COURT OF APPEAL

HMCTS GUIDANCE: CLOSURE OF COUNTERS IN THE QBD AND COURT OF APPEAL

March 18, 2020 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil Procedure, Members Content

In press Notices sent out at 21.55 this evening HMCTS announced the closure of counters at the QBD and  Court of Appeal.  These are both set out in full below.   QBD “The Queen’s Bench Division is making some temporary…

HMCTS GUIDANCE ON TELEPHONE AND VIDEO HEARINGS DURING CORONAVIRUS OUTBREAK

HMCTS GUIDANCE ON TELEPHONE AND VIDEO HEARINGS DURING CORONAVIRUS OUTBREAK

March 18, 2020 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil Procedure, Members Content

HMCTS has published guidance HMCTS telephone and video hearings during coronavirus outbreak   THE GUIDANCE “Running our courts and tribunals is an essential public service. Audio and video technology has long played a part in the justice system and can now…

CIVIL PROCEDURE AND THE CORONAVIRUS: PRACTICAL SOLUTIONS IN AN UNCERTAIN TIME: WEBINAR 25th MARCH 2020

CIVIL PROCEDURE AND THE CORONAVIRUS: PRACTICAL SOLUTIONS IN AN UNCERTAIN TIME: WEBINAR 25th MARCH 2020

March 18, 2020 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil Procedure, Members Content

On the 25th March 2020 at 1.00 pm I am giving a webinar on civil procedure and coronavirus, dealing with the best means of coping with procedural and other issues arising from COVID-19.  This is aimed primarily at personal injury…

GUIDANCE ON CORONAVIRUS FOR ADVOCATES FROM THE BAR COUNCIL (AND THE NEED FOR A CLEAR STATEMENT FROM THE BAR STANDARDS BOARD)

GUIDANCE ON CORONAVIRUS FOR ADVOCATES FROM THE BAR COUNCIL (AND THE NEED FOR A CLEAR STATEMENT FROM THE BAR STANDARDS BOARD)

March 16, 2020 · by gexall · in Applications, Avoiding negligence claims, Members Content

The Bar Council website has useful guidance on dealing with Coronavirus, this is in a section on its website here.    GUIDANCE GIVEN ON THE 16th MARCH 2020 This guidance is available from a link on the page, also here….

CORONAVIRUS - A USEFUL CASE: MASTER ALLOWS PARTY TO VARY DIRECTIONS BY CONSENT BY 56 DAYS

CORONAVIRUS – A USEFUL CASE: MASTER ALLOWS PARTY TO VARY DIRECTIONS BY CONSENT BY 56 DAYS

March 16, 2020 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil Procedure, Extensions of time, Members Content

7BR’s website carries an interesting report  from Adam Korn of a judgment today where Master Davison made an order extending the amount of time the parties can agree to vary directions.  This was directly because of potential difficulties arising out…

DEFENCE STRUCK OUT FOLLOWING FAILURE TO GIVE FULL DISCLOSURE: SEVERE SANCTION WAS NOT DISPROPORTIONATE

DEFENCE STRUCK OUT FOLLOWING FAILURE TO GIVE FULL DISCLOSURE: SEVERE SANCTION WAS NOT DISPROPORTIONATE

March 13, 2020 · by gexall · in Applications, Disclosure, Members Content, Relief from sanctions, Striking out

In MKG Convenience Ltd, Re [2020] EWHC 547 (Ch) HHJ David Cooke refused the defendants’ application for relief from sanctions following a failure to comply with a peremptory order in relation to disclosure.   The sanction was severe, however the circumstances…

DEFENDANT'S PART 20 CLAIM AGAINST CLAIMANT'S WITNESSES STRUCK OUT: WITNESSES HAVE IMMUNITY (AND THIS HAS CONSEQUENCES...)

DEFENDANT’S PART 20 CLAIM AGAINST CLAIMANT’S WITNESSES STRUCK OUT: WITNESSES HAVE IMMUNITY (AND THIS HAS CONSEQUENCES…)

March 12, 2020 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Striking out, Witness statements

I am grateful to barrister David Green for supplying me with a note* of the judgment of HHJ Saggerson in Holley -v- Woodburn.  HHJ Saggerson, Central London County Court). A copy of the judgment is available  here C65YX969 Holley v…

OUT OF TIME APPEAL ALLOWED BECAUSE OF ITS UNDERLYING MERITS: DENTON CONSIDERED

OUT OF TIME APPEAL ALLOWED BECAUSE OF ITS UNDERLYING MERITS: DENTON CONSIDERED

March 10, 2020 · by gexall · in Appeals, Applications, Extensions of time, Members Content, Relief from sanctions

For the second time in two days I am writing about a relief from sanctions case where the court took into account the merits of the underlying case.  Yesterday relief was refused because the court held that the case had…

APPLICATION FOR RELIEF REFUSED BECAUSE THE UNDERLYING CLAIM WAS MISCONCEIVED: A RARE EXAMPLE OF THE MERITS OF THE ACTION BEING CONSIDERED

APPLICATION FOR RELIEF REFUSED BECAUSE THE UNDERLYING CLAIM WAS MISCONCEIVED: A RARE EXAMPLE OF THE MERITS OF THE ACTION BEING CONSIDERED

March 9, 2020 · by gexall · in Applications, Members Content, Relief from sanctions

In  Price, R v (on the application of) v The Crown Court at Snaresbrook [2020] EWHC 496 (Admin) Mr Justice Freedman refused the claimant’s application for relief from sanctions because the underlying claim was “hopeless”. This is a rare example…

INTERVIEWS FOR PUPILLAGE AND TRAINING CONTRACTS: ADVICE FROM ACROSS THE PROFESSION

INTERVIEWS FOR PUPILLAGE AND TRAINING CONTRACTS: ADVICE FROM ACROSS THE PROFESSION

March 8, 2020 · by gexall · in Applications, Members Content, Useful links

There was some controversy earlier this week when Legal Cheek reported on websites charging barrister hopefuls as much as £200 an hour for pupillage interview advice.   Many of the lawyers on Twitter were fairly outraged by this practice and doubted…

CLAIMANT'S HUMAN RIGHTS CLAIM FOR LOSS OF CHERISHED NUMBER PLATES NOT STRUCK OUT:

CLAIMANT’S HUMAN RIGHTS CLAIM FOR LOSS OF CHERISHED NUMBER PLATES NOT STRUCK OUT:

March 6, 2020 · by gexall · in Abuse of Process, Applications, Members Content, Striking out, Summary judgment

I am grateful to solicitor Ian Bailey from PGB Gitlin Baker for sending me a copy of the decision of HHJ Roberts in Phillips -v- Secretary of State for Transport.  (County Court at Central London 24/02/2020 – a copy of…

THE PROBLEMS THAT CAN OCCUR WHEN A LAWYER MAKES A STATEMENT ON THEIR CLIENT'S BEHALF: "I ATTACH NO WEIGHT TO WHAT HE SAYS"

THE PROBLEMS THAT CAN OCCUR WHEN A LAWYER MAKES A STATEMENT ON THEIR CLIENT’S BEHALF: “I ATTACH NO WEIGHT TO WHAT HE SAYS”

March 4, 2020 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil evidence, Members Content, Witness statements

This blog has looked, many times, at the pitfalls that can occur when lawyers make statements on behalf of their clients.  An example can be seen in the judge of Mr Justice Edis in Cobussen Principal Investment Holdings Ltd v…

SETTING ASIDE DEFAULT JUDGMENT: THE NEED FOR PROMPTNESS AND THE RELEVANCE OF THE DENTON CRITERIA

SETTING ASIDE DEFAULT JUDGMENT: THE NEED FOR PROMPTNESS AND THE RELEVANCE OF THE DENTON CRITERIA

March 2, 2020 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Relief from sanctions, Setting aside judgment

In Core-Export Spa -v- Yang Ming Marine Transportation Corp [2020] EWHC 425 (Comm) HHJ Pelling QC (sitting as a High Court Judge) refused an application to set aside a default judgment.  The defendant had an arguable defence, however its history…

EXPERT'S CONDUCT DID NOT LEAD TO EVIDENCE BEING DISALLOWED: CLAIMANT'S CASE REMAINS ON TRACK

EXPERT’S CONDUCT DID NOT LEAD TO EVIDENCE BEING DISALLOWED: CLAIMANT’S CASE REMAINS ON TRACK

February 26, 2020 · by gexall · in Abuse of Process, Applications, Case Management, Civil evidence, Conduct, Expert evidence, Experts, Members Content

In Blackpool Borough Council v Volkerfitzpatrick Ltd and Range Roofing and Cladding Ltd & Ors [2020] EWHC 387 (TCC)   HHJ Davies (sitting as a High Court judge) carried out a detailed consideration of the conduct of an expert when considering,…

JUDGE WAS CORRECT TO STRIKE OUT ACTION AGAINST NON-EXISTENT COMPANY: ALSO GUIDANCE FOR INSURERS ON MOST PRUDENT COURSE OF ACTION

JUDGE WAS CORRECT TO STRIKE OUT ACTION AGAINST NON-EXISTENT COMPANY: ALSO GUIDANCE FOR INSURERS ON MOST PRUDENT COURSE OF ACTION

February 25, 2020 · by gexall · in Appeals, Applications, Members Content, Striking out

In the judgment in Cowley v LW Carlisle & Company Ltd [2020] EWCA Civ 227 today the Court of Appeal dismissed the claimant’s appeal against an order striking out his claim against one defendant.  At the time the striking out…

MAKING SERIOUS SAVINGS ON TRAIN TRAVEL: ADVICE FROM A WELL TRAVELLED PROFESSOR : WHY FIRST CLASS IS SOMETIMES CHEAPER

MAKING SERIOUS SAVINGS ON TRAIN TRAVEL: ADVICE FROM A WELL TRAVELLED PROFESSOR : WHY FIRST CLASS IS SOMETIMES CHEAPER

February 24, 2020 · by gexall · in Applications, Assessment of Costs, Members Content

Last September there was a crowd-sourced post on this blog about  the best means of travel and accommodation for lawyers.  This is particular interest to litigators who who to travel for court hearings or meetings. When Professor Dominic Regan contacted…

APPLICATIONS TO THE COURT AND THE DUTY OF CANDOUR: THE JUDGE MUST SEE DOCUMENTS THAT ARE ADVERSE TO YOUR CASE

APPLICATIONS TO THE COURT AND THE DUTY OF CANDOUR: THE JUDGE MUST SEE DOCUMENTS THAT ARE ADVERSE TO YOUR CASE

February 23, 2020 · by gexall · in Applications, Conduct, Injunctions, Members Content, Witness statements

In Short & Ors, R (On the Application Of) v Police Misconduct Tribunal & Anor [2020] EWHC 385 (Admin)  Mr Justice Saini issued a warning about the duty of candour owed to the court, particularly on a without notice application….

THE VULNERABLE CLAIMANT GIVING EVIDENCE: GROUND RULES AND INTERMEDIARIES: "I HAVE STRONG RESERVATIONS ABOUT WHETHER ANY OF THE GROUND RULES WERE NECESSARY"

THE VULNERABLE CLAIMANT GIVING EVIDENCE: GROUND RULES AND INTERMEDIARIES: “I HAVE STRONG RESERVATIONS ABOUT WHETHER ANY OF THE GROUND RULES WERE NECESSARY”

February 21, 2020 · by gexall · in Advocacy, Applications, Civil evidence, Members Content, Witness statements

In the judgment today  in Morrow v Shrewsbury Rugby Union Football Club Ltd [2020] EWHC 379 (QB) Mrs Justice Farbey considered a case that involved a vulnerable claimant.  The judgment contains some scepticism as to whether  the ground rules set…

EARLY NEUTRAL EVALUATION BY THE COURTS: PRACTICAL GUIDANCE AS TO PROCEDURE AND IMPLEMENTATION

EARLY NEUTRAL EVALUATION BY THE COURTS: PRACTICAL GUIDANCE AS TO PROCEDURE AND IMPLEMENTATION

February 20, 2020 · by gexall · in Applications, Case Management, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content

There is a short judgment of Master McCloud today in Telecom Centre (UK) Ltd v Thomas Sanderson Ltd (Early Neutral Evaluation) [2020] EWHC 368 (QB)  which contains some important observations on the practical implementation of Early Neutral Evaluation by the…

ACCURATE TIME ESTIMATES: A ROUND UP OF THE CASES AND SOME GUIDANCE (IF YOU HAVE THE TIME TO READ IT...)

ACCURATE TIME ESTIMATES: A ROUND UP OF THE CASES AND SOME GUIDANCE (IF YOU HAVE THE TIME TO READ IT…)

February 20, 2020 · by gexall · in Applications, Case Management, Civil Procedure, Members Content

In Kazakhstan Kagazy Plc & Ors v Zhunus & Ors [2020] EWHC 128 (Comm) Mr Justice Andrew Baker made some observations about inadequate time estimates.  This criticism was specifically about applications in the Commercial Court.  However time estimates are an…

THE SET OFF OF COSTS AND QOCS: A HIGH COURT DECISION: THE COURT HAS A DISCRETION TO SET OFF COSTS - BUT ON THE FACTS OF THIS CASE WOULD NOT DO SO

THE SET OFF OF COSTS AND QOCS: A HIGH COURT DECISION: THE COURT HAS A DISCRETION TO SET OFF COSTS – BUT ON THE FACTS OF THIS CASE WOULD NOT DO SO

February 18, 2020 · by gexall · in Applications, Costs, Members Content

In the judgment given this morning in Faulkner -v- Secretary of State for Energy and Industrial Strategy [2020] EWHC 296 (QB) Mr Justice Turner considered the issue of whether a defendant, ordered to pay costs when  failing in an application…

FIXED COSTS OUSTED BY AGREEMENT: INSURER HAS TO STAND BY THE DEAL IT STRUCK

FIXED COSTS OUSTED BY AGREEMENT: INSURER HAS TO STAND BY THE DEAL IT STRUCK

February 12, 2020 · by gexall · in Applications, Assessment of Costs, Costs, Fixed Costs, Members Content, Personal Injury

I am grateful to barrister Andrew Roy  for sending me a copy of the decision of District Judge Baldwin (sitting as a Regional Costs Judge) in Turner -v- Cole (16th December 2019). It is a case where the judge held…

MARGARET THATCHER, BETAMAX VIDEOS, THE MACARENA AND CIVIL PROCEDURE (ECHOES OF COMPLAINTS FROM "DOWN UNDER")

MARGARET THATCHER, BETAMAX VIDEOS, THE MACARENA AND CIVIL PROCEDURE (ECHOES OF COMPLAINTS FROM “DOWN UNDER”)

February 9, 2020 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil Procedure, Members Content

The judgment of Lord Justice Coulson in  Lejonvarn v Burgess & Anor [2020] EWCA Civ 114 commenting on a case “with echoes of the bad old days” shares some sentiments with the judgment of Lee J in the Federal Court of…

THE DANGERS OF MAKING ORDERS FOR SPLIT TRIALS: DECISION AT TRIAL SET ASIDE DUE TO A SERIOUS PROCEDURAL IRREGULARITY

THE DANGERS OF MAKING ORDERS FOR SPLIT TRIALS: DECISION AT TRIAL SET ASIDE DUE TO A SERIOUS PROCEDURAL IRREGULARITY

February 7, 2020 · by gexall · in Appeals, Applications, Case Management, Civil Procedure, Members Content

The judgment of Mr Justice Murray today in Sharn Panesar Ltd v Pistachios In The Park Ltd & Anor [2020] EWHC 194 (QB) illustrates some of the dangers of holding a trial on a preliminary issue. In this case a…

JUDGMENT IN DEFAULT - AFTER DEFENCE IS DUE BUT WHEN DEFENCE IS FILED LATE: ISSUE TO BE DETERMINED BY THE COURT OF APPEAL

JUDGMENT IN DEFAULT – AFTER DEFENCE IS DUE BUT WHEN DEFENCE IS FILED LATE: ISSUE TO BE DETERMINED BY THE COURT OF APPEAL

February 5, 2020 · by gexall · in Appeals, Applications, Civil Procedure, Default judgment,, Members Content, Setting aside judgment

An earlier post dealt with rule changes that come into force in April in relation to default judgment being entered. The new rules make it clear that judgment cannot be entered if the court has received an acknowledgement of service…

NEW RULES ON ENTERING A DEFAULT JUDGMENT WHERE ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF SERVICE OR DEFENCE IS FILED LATE

NEW RULES ON ENTERING A DEFAULT JUDGMENT WHERE ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF SERVICE OR DEFENCE IS FILED LATE

February 5, 2020 · by gexall · in Applications, Default judgment,, Members Content, Rule Changes

We have looked several times at the cases (sometimes conflicting cases) about whether a defence can be filed late.  In some cases it has been held that a claimant faced with a late defence can enter default judgment even when…

LATE COSTS BUDGET: RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS GRANTED: DEFENDANT DROPPED THE BALL BUT THIS WAS FORGIVABLE

LATE COSTS BUDGET: RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS GRANTED: DEFENDANT DROPPED THE BALL BUT THIS WAS FORGIVABLE

February 5, 2020 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil Procedure, Costs, Costs budgeting, Members Content, Relief from sanctions

In Manchester Shipping Ltd v Balfour Shipping Ltd & Anor [2020] EWHC 164 (Comm) Lionel Persey QC (sitting as a Deputy High Court Judge) granted relief from sanctions to a defendant who had filed a costs budget late.  The case…

SEEKING FURTHER DISCLOSURE: DON'T GO IMPORTING STONES FROM A NEIGHBOURING QUARRY: DISCLOSURE PILOT PREVAILS

SEEKING FURTHER DISCLOSURE: DON’T GO IMPORTING STONES FROM A NEIGHBOURING QUARRY: DISCLOSURE PILOT PREVAILS

February 2, 2020 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Disclosure, Members Content

In Maher v Maher & Anor [2019] EWHC 3613 (Ch) HHJ  Hodge (sitting as a High Court Judge) refused an application for disclosure.   There are a number of important points here, including the need for an application for further disclosure to…

THE COSTS OF PRE-ACTION DISCLOSURE: IS IT WORTH THE RISK? £40,000 SPENT IN COSTS FOR DOCUMENTS THAT WERE AVAILABLE UNDER GDPR

THE COSTS OF PRE-ACTION DISCLOSURE: IS IT WORTH THE RISK? £40,000 SPENT IN COSTS FOR DOCUMENTS THAT WERE AVAILABLE UNDER GDPR

February 2, 2020 · by gexall · in Applications, Assessment of Costs, Costs, Members Content, Summary assessment,

I am looking again at the decision in  Hussain v Medical Defence Union & Anor [2020] EWHC 157 (QB). This time I am looking at the order in relation to costs.  The application cost in excess of £40,000 in relation to…

APPLICATION UNDER SECTION 33 SUCCEEDS MORE THAN 24 YEARS AFTER EXPIRY OF LIMITATION PERIOD

APPLICATION UNDER SECTION 33 SUCCEEDS MORE THAN 24 YEARS AFTER EXPIRY OF LIMITATION PERIOD

January 30, 2020 · by gexall · in Applications, Limitation, Members Content, Personal Injury

In BXB v Watch Tower And Bible Tract Society of Pennsylvannia & Anor [2020] EWHC 156 (QB) Mr Justice Chamberlain allowed the claimant’s application under Section 33 of the Limitation Act in a case that was issued more than 24…

JOINDER OF NEW PARTIES IN EXISTING PROCEEDINGS 2: THE PRINCIPLES (AND THE COSTS!)

JOINDER OF NEW PARTIES IN EXISTING PROCEEDINGS 2: THE PRINCIPLES (AND THE COSTS!)

January 28, 2020 · by gexall · in Amendment, Applications, Case Management, Civil Procedure, Members Content

We are looking again at the decision of HHJ Kimbell QC (sitting as a High Court judge) in  Molavi v Hibbert & Ors [2020] EWHC, this time relating to the principles to be considered in relation to joinder of additional parties….

JOINDER OF NEW PARTIES INTO EXISTING PROCEEDINGS 1: NOTIFY THE EXISTING PARTIES: THE RULES DON'T SAY SO BUT COMMON SENSE DOES

JOINDER OF NEW PARTIES INTO EXISTING PROCEEDINGS 1: NOTIFY THE EXISTING PARTIES: THE RULES DON’T SAY SO BUT COMMON SENSE DOES

January 28, 2020 · by gexall · in Applications, Case Management, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Parties to actions

There are a few interesting procedural matters that flow from the decision of HHJ Kimbell QC (sitting as a High Court judge) in  Molavi v Hibbert & Ors [2020] EWHC 121 (Ch).  Here we look at the judge’s comments on…

COURT OF APPEAL DECISION TODAY: "WAREHOUSING" A CLAIM IS NOT AN ALWAYS ABUSE OF PROCESS (AND SHOULD NOT HAVE BEEN STRUCK OUT IN ANY EVENT)

COURT OF APPEAL DECISION TODAY: “WAREHOUSING” A CLAIM IS NOT AN ALWAYS ABUSE OF PROCESS (AND SHOULD NOT HAVE BEEN STRUCK OUT IN ANY EVENT)

January 24, 2020 · by gexall · in Abuse of Process, Appeals, Applications, Civil Procedure, Members Content

In the judgment today in Alibrahim v Asturion Fondation [2020] EWCA Civ 32 the Court of Appeal confirmed that the court should not have struck out a claim that had been left dormant for a period. “Striking out was a…

← Previous 1 … 24 25 26 … 47 Next →

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email. Subscription notifies you of a new post, it does not give you access to members' content.

Join 12.4K other subscribers

Recent Posts

  • COMMERCIAL LITIGATORS ON THE NAUGHTY STEP 3: WHY PD57AC WAS INTRODUCED: “THE PROPER AND SENSIBLE SCOPE OF EVIDENCE-IN-CHIEF IS NO LONGER THE STOCK-IN-TRADE KNOWLEDGE OF THOSE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROOFING WITNESSSES…”
  • PROVING THINGS 288: HOW SHOULD A COURT CONSIDER A CLAIM FOR LOSS OF EARNINGS WHEN THE CLAIMANT IS STILL IN EMPLOYMENT? SMITH -v- MANCHESTER APPROACH PREVAILS
  • CLAIMS FOR LOSS OF EARNINGS: AVOIDING THE PITFALLS: WEBINAR 19th JUNE 2026 (TOGETHER WITH A USEFUL QUESTIONNAIRE AND SERIES OF CHECKLISTS)
  • THE “WEAPONISATION” OF APPLICATIONS TO COMMIT IN CIVIL PROCEEDINGS: IT’S NOT CLEVER, IT’S NOT “TOUGH” AND IT CERTAINLY IS NOT A MARKETING TOOL
  • COST BITES 378 : REFORM OF THE SOLICITORS ACT 1974, PART III: READ THE CONSULATION PAPER: A CHANCE TO COMMENT ON THE PROVISIONS THAT ARE “A GREAT MYSTERY” TO MANY SOLICITORS (NOT MY WORDS…)

Top Posts

  • COST (MEGA) BITES 378: WHO WOULD SPEND £15,751,483 PLUS VAT TO RECOVER DAMAGES OF £16.91? (WELCOME TO THE SURREAL WORLD OF "COLLECTIVE PROCEEDINGS": THE CAT ARE CONCERNED THAT LITIGATION IS BEING BROUGHT FOR THE LAWYERS & FUNDERS RATHER THAN CONSUMERS
  • THE "WEAPONISATION" OF APPLICATIONS TO COMMIT IN CIVIL PROCEEDINGS: IT'S NOT CLEVER, IT'S NOT "TOUGH" AND IT CERTAINLY IS NOT A MARKETING TOOL
  • THROWBACK FRIDAY: SCHEDULES AND COUNTER-SCHEDULES ARE NOT A "NUMBER CRUNCHING EXERCISE" (APRIL 2018)
  • WITNESS STATEMENTS SERVED LATE: THE COURT GRANTED RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS - BUT... : BE WARY OF MISSING THINGS WHEN OTHER THINGS ARE GOING ON...
  • COMMERCIAL LITIGATORS ON THE NAUGHTY STEP 2: NON-COMPLIANCE WITH PD57AC: "HE KNOWS NOT OF WHAT HE SPEAKS"

Archives

Blogroll

  • Fatal Accident Law
  • Legal Futures
  • Personal injury: Liability and Damages

Books

  • Munkman & Exall on Damages for Personal Injuries and Death 15th ed
  • The APIL Guide to Fatal Accidents 4th edition

Useful Links

  • Buntools (for preparing PDF Bundles)
  • Kings Chambers
  • Kings Chambers Costs & Litigation Funding
  • Kings Chambers Serious Injury
  • The Civil Procedure Rules
  • The Law Society Gazette
  • The National Archives Recently Published Judgments
  • The Senior Court Costs Office Guide 2025
  • www.Bailii.org

Copyright

© Gordon Exall, Exall Legal Training, Civil Litigation Brief, 2013-2026. Unauthorised use and or duplication of the material contained on this blog without permission is strictly prohibited.
Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.

To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
  • Membership Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Advertising Policy
  • Copyright
  • Legal Disclaimer

Copyright © 2026 Civil Litigation Brief

Powered by Big Yellow Workshop

 

Loading Comments...
 

You must be logged in to post a comment.