THE CORRECT COURT FEE WHEN ADDITIONAL PARTIES ARE JOINED INTO AN ACTION: NOT £55 BUT £10,000 (OH, AND YOU CAN’T RELY ON WHAT THE COURT TOLD YOU…)
There are not many cases where a judge is asked to determine what the appropriate court fee should be. However this is precisely what occurred in the judgment of HHJ Pearce in Walayat & Ors v Berkeley Solicitors Ltd [2021]…
JUDGE REFUSES PERMISSION TO A DEFENDANT TO RELY ON A WITNESS STATEMENT SERVED LATE: THE APPLICATION DID NOT FLY…
In Manchester Airport PLC & Anor v Radisson Hotel Manchester Ltd & Anor [2020] EWHC 3739 (Ch) HHJ Halliwell refused a defendant’s application to serve witness evidence late. “There cannot be any reasonable justification for adjourning the trial to give the…
INEFFECTIVE REDACTION IN DISCLOSED DOCUMENTS: A WARNING TO ALL LITIGATORS (AND LOCAL AUTHORITIES…)
Sometimes documents can be redacted. The judgment of Mr Justice Pepperall in London Borough of Lambeth v AM (Judgment No. 2) [2021] EWHC 186 (QB) shows that great care must be taken in “redacted” documents provided electronically. THE CASE The…
TAKING APPROPRIATE STEPS WHEN A DEFENDANT DOES NOT HAVE CAPACITY: AN IMPORTANT WARNING
A real and profound warning about the dangers of issuing against someone without capacity is given in the judgment of HHJ Hodge QC sitting as a judge of the High Court in Kumar v Hellard [2021] EWHC 181 (Ch). …
SOLICITORS SUING FOR THEIR COSTS AND SUMMARY JUDGMENT: THE AMOUNT OF DETAIL NEEDED IN THE BILL
In Devonshires Solicitors LLP v Elbishlawi & Anor [2021] EWHC 173 (Comm) Mr Justice Butcher considered the position when a solicitor was suing for their costs and the bill was challenged. Summary judgment was allowed for some of the bills, other,…
COSTS NOT REDUCED BECAUSE OF THE WAY A DEFENDANT CONDUCTED ITS CASE: THE PRAGMATIC PRUNING OF A CASE SHOULD NOT BE DETERRED
We are returning again (and not for the last time) to the judgment of Mr Justice Turner in Municipio De Mariana & Ors v BHP Group PLC & Anor [2021] EWHC 146 (TCC). This time we are looking at the claimants’ argument…
SOLICITOR DID NOT HAVE GOOD GROUNDS TO TERMINATE THE RETAINER UNDER A CFA: CLAIM FOR £16,200 IN COSTS FAILS
I am returning to the judgment of Master Haworth in Murray & Anor v Richard Slade and Company Ltd [2021] EWHC B3 (Costs). This time looking at the decision in relation to termination of a conditional fee agreement. The Master held…
FIRST SERVICE CASE OF THE YEAR: SERVING PROCEEDINGS IS NOT ALWAYS A WALK ON THE BEACH
In Alli-Balogun & On The Beach Ltd & Ors [2021] EWHC 83 (QB) Mr Justice Bourne considered an issue relating to mis-service of proceedings. He held that service on a foreign company on another company, in the same group, with…
THE DANGER OF CLAIMANT’S PART 36 OFFERS: THE DEFENDANT CAN WAIT ONE DAY AND THEN PUT COSTS AT LARGE
In Pallett v MGN Ltd [2021] EWHC 76 (Ch) Mr Justice Mann considered a major anomaly in the rules relating to claimant’s Part 36 offers. This shows that any claimant making a Part 36 offer must remember that a defendant…
ANOTHER WITNESS STATEMENT THAT STRAYED INTO INADMISSIBLE ARGUMENTS, PROTRACTED COMMENTARY AND EXPERT EVIDENCE
There have been a number of recent cases regarding the appropriate drafting of witness statements, in particular attempts to put much inadmissible material into statements. This can be seen in the judgment of HH Russen QC in Philipp v Barclays…
CLAIMANTS SUED THE WRONG (NON-EXISTENT) DEFENDANT – AND THE LIMITATION PERIOD HAD EXPIRED: DON’T START BREAKING THE CROCKERY JUST YET
In The 52 Occupiers of the Ceramic Works v Bowmer & Kirkland Ltd & Anor [2021] EWHC 17 (TCC) District Judge Baldwin considered an application to substitute a defendant after the primary limitation period had expired. The judge, if anything,…
COVID DOESN’T STOP THE COURTS GOING ON: BUT GREAT CARE IS NEEDED
In Bilta (UK) Ltd & Ors v SVS Securities Plc & Ors [2021] EWHC 36 (Ch) Mr Justice Marcus Smith examined in detail the principles relating to court hearings during COVID. There is an examination of the steps that need…
COURT REFUSES CLAIMANT PERMISSION TO WITHDRAW FROM ADMISSIONS: “THE WHOLE POINT OF THINGS BEING ADMITTED IS THAT PARTIES CAN MOVE ON AND NOT BE BOTHERED WITH INVESTIGATING SUCH MATTERS”
In Advinia Care Homes Ltd v (1) BUPA Care Homes Investments (Holdings) Ltd & Ors [2020] EWHC 1563 (Ch) Mr Michael Green QC (sitting as a High Court judge) refused a claimant’s application to withdraw from an admission. “The whole…
A CLAIMANT’S ADDRESS SHOULD BE ON THE CLAIM FORM: BUT A FAILURE DOES NOT LEAD TO A GRANT OF SECURITY FOR COSTS
The judgment of Master Kaye in Beriwala v Woodstone Properties (Birmingham) Ltd & Anor [2021] EWHC 6 (Ch) provides a reminder that the inclusion of the claimant’s address on the claim form is a mandatory requirement [unless an application is…
IT IS UNLAWFUL TO TAKE PHOTOGRAPHS OF A TRIAL CONDUCTED REMOTELY
In SLF Associates Inc v (1) HSBC (UK) Bank Plc & Ors [2021] EWHC 5 (Ch) Master Kaye pointed out that taking photographs of participants in a remote court was unlawful. THE CASE The Master was giving judgment in a…
SERVICE OF DEFENCE BY EMAIL NOT GOOD SERVICE: RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS REQUIRED TO SET ASIDE JUDGMENT (AND GRANTED)
The judgment of Mr Justice Calver in Ipsum Capital Ltd v Lyall & Ors [2020] EWHC 3508 (Comm) shows the dangers of serving documents by email. The judge held that service of a defence by email was not good service…
JOINT LIABILITY OF DEFENDANTS TO PAY COSTS: TRYING TO MAKE A SIMPLE THING MORE COMPLICATED: THE IMPORTANCE OF OBTAINING AFTER THE EVENT INSURANCE FOR EVERY PARTY TO AN ACTION
The judgment of HHJ Keyser QC in Arag Plc v Jones & Anor [2020] EWHC 3484 (Comm) is, on the face of it, a technical issue about the right of an insurer to claim a contribution. The key issue here,…
COSTS LAWYERS BEWARE: COURT REFUSES TO SET ASIDE DEFAULT COSTS CERTIFICATE: “AVOIDABLE DELAY” IS NOT LOOKED AT KINDLY
In Masten v London Britannia Hotel Ltd [2020] EWHC B31 (Costs) Mr Leonard refused to set aside a default costs certificate. This serves as a salutary warning of the importance of time limits. Further the Master observed that if a…
DIVIDING FACTS FROM COMMENTS AND SUBMISSIONS: WHY IT MATTERS AND HOW IT CAN HELP YOUR CASE
The judgment is Scottow -v- Crown Prosecution Service [2020] EWHC 3421 (Admin) is of interest for many reasons. This, however, is a blog about procedure. It is worthwhile looking at the comments that the Divisional Court made about the way…
THE COURT FINDS IT DOES NOT HAVE JURISDICTION TO ORDER A TRANSFER FROM PART 8 TO PART 7
This is a note about a hearing I was involved in today (16th December 2020). A decision by Deputy Master Yoxall. For various reasons I cannot name the parties, however I have my Instructing Solicitors’ permission to set out the…
MISTAKES IN THE TERMS OF AN ORDER, DENTON AND THE SLIP RULE: AN UNFORTUNATE ERROR LEADS TO A LOT OF LITIGATION
In IC v RC [2020] EWHC 2997 (Fam) Mrs Justice Knowles had to consider the Denton criteria and the slip rule. It also serves as an important warning to anyone undertaking the task of drafting a court order. “I…
SERVICE OF UNSEALED AMENDED CLAIM FORMS DID NOT CONSTITUTE GOOD SERVICE: ALL OF THE CLAIMANTS’ ATTEMPT TO REMEDY THE SITUATION COME TO GRIEF: THE CLAIMANTS’ CARDS WERE MARKED
In November I wrote that there had been a lull in reported cases relating to service of the claim form. As predicted that lull did not last long. In Ideal Shopping Direct Ltd & Ors v Visa Europe Ltd &…
INSURER WAS ENTITLED TO AVOID EMPLOYER’S LIABILITY POLICY: A RESULT THAT IS “DEFECTIVE AND UNFAIR”
The judgment of Master Davison in Komives v Hick Lane Bedding Ltd & Anor [2020] EWHC 3288 (QB) highlights an area of law which, as the Master stated, is “defective an unfair”- an insurer was entitled to avoid an employer’s…
SUMMARY ASSESSMENT OF COSTS: WHAT TO DO IF YOU ARE PRESSED FOR TIME
I am looking again at the judgment of HHJ Hodge QC in Cohen v Fine & Ors [2020] EWHC 3278 (Ch) a because, in concentrating on the issues relating to hourly rates, the other important part of the judgment may…
EXPERT EVIDENCE NOT ADMITTED: IT WAS NOT NECESSARY AND TOO COSTLY
It must be disheartening for parties who get to trial to find that the judge does not think that the “experts” they have instructed (at great cost) are not regarded by the courts as experts at all. This is exactly…
CLAIMANT REFUSED PERMISSION TO RELY ON NEW WITNESS STATEMENT SERVED PART-WAY THROUGH A TRIAL: LATE WITNESSES COULD NOT BE ALLOWED TO PLUG GAPS
In PJSC Tatneft v Bogolyubov & Ors [2020] EWHC 3250 (Comm) Mrs Justice Moulder refused the claimant’s application for permission to rely on new evidence which was served in the middle of a trial. Not only is this a consideration…
A PANDEMIC DOESN’T STOP YOU TICKING A BOX: DEFENDANT’S APPLICATION FOR ADJOURNMENT OF DEFAULT JUDGMENT APPLICATION REFUSED
In Glenn v Kline [2020] EWHC 3182 (QB) Mr Justice Nicklin refused the defendant’s application for an adjournment of an application for judgement in default of acknowledgement of service. The reasons provided by the defendant, including COVID, did not provide…
INDEMNITY COSTS AFTER A JUDGMENT DEBTOR WAS EXAMINED: IN ADDITION THERE IS GOING TO BE A SECOND MATCH…
In Shearer v Neal [2020] EWHC 3148 (QB) Deputy Master Hill QC ordered that a debtor pay costs on the indemnity basis after she heard a Part 71 hearing. The case was also remitted to the High Court Judge on…
MORE ON OPINION EVIDENCE IN WITNESS STATEMENTS: DEFENDANT’S STATEMENT LARGELY STRUCK OUT AS AN ABUSE
The judgment in Flaxby Park Ltd v Harrogate Borough Council [2020] EWHC 3204 (Admin) that was looked at yesterday referred to the earlier case of JD Wetherspoon plc v Harris [2013] 1 WLR 3296. Since that decision pre-dated this blog. I thought it…
APPEALS, ISSUES OF FACT AND SAILING IN DIFFERENT OCEANS IN THE COURT OF APPEAL: CLINICAL NEGLIGENCE DECISION TODAY
In Hewes v West Hertfordshire Acute Hospitals NHS Trust & Ors [2020] EWCA Civ 1523 the Court of Appeal reiterated the difficulties faced by an appellant attempting to argue that the judge had erred in relation to findings of the…
COURT REFUSES PARTY PERMISSION TO RELY ON WITNESS STATEMENT SERVED LATE
In RGB Plastering Ltd v TAWE Drylining and Plastering Ltd [2020] EWHC 3028 (TCC) HHJ Jarman QC (sitting as a judge of the High Court) refused the defendant permission to rely on a witness statement that was served late. “Ms…
REMOTE HEARINGS: TRIAL CAN GO AHEAD WITH PARTICIPANTS FROM ABROAD ALLOWED TO WATCH (SUBJECT TO SAFEGUARDS)
In the judgment this morning in Huber & Anor v X-Yachts (GB) Ltd & Anor [2020] EWHC 3082 (TCC) Mr Justice Kerr rejected an argument that participants in a civil trial could not continue to watch the trial if they…
CLAIMANT’S CASE STRUCK OUT BECAUSE IT SAID TWO CONTRADICTORY THINGS: “JANUS-FACED” PLEADINGS NOT ALLOWED
The judgment of Mr Justice Marcus Smith in Betesh Partnership -v- Evans [2020] EWHC 1589 (QB) contains interesting observations on the need for a claimant to plead a case that is not inconsistent. I am working and citing from the…
FUNDAMENTAL DISHONESTY, APPEALS AND RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS: CLAIMANT’S PROPOSED APPEAL COMES TO GRIEF
The judgment of Mr Justice Lavender in Kamara v Builder Depot Ltd [2020] EWHC 3046 (QB) contains a catalogue of material in relation to procedural issues and appeals. However, here, I want to concentrate upon the issues relating to fundamental…
THOUSANDS OF DOCUMENTS AND LEAVING SOME POINTS ON THE CUTTING ROOM FLOOR: THE JUDGE’S LAMENT
In Município De Mariana & Ors v BHP Group Plc & Anor [2020] EWHC 2930 (TCC) Mr Justice Turner allowed the defendants’ application to strike out the claim being brought by 202,600 claimants. Here we look at the observations in relation…
APPLYING FOR RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS: TWO CLASSIC MISTAKES AND A REMINDER OF 10 KEY POINTS
The judgment in Diriye v Bojaj & Anor [2020] EWCA Civ 1400 shows, at least, two classic mistakes that people make when applying for relief from sanctions: not making the application promptly and not remedying the default properly (in fact…
“THE DOG ATE MY HOMEWORK” EXCUSE DOESN’T WORK WELL IN COURT: THE JUDGE MAY HAVE BEEN WRONG ABOUT THE WAY “SIGNED FOR 1ST CLASS” OPERATED BUT THEY WERE RIGHT TO REFUSE RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS: COURT OF APPEAL DECIION
In Diriye v Bojaj & Anor [2020] EWCA Civ 1400 the Court of Appeal held that the judges who heard a relief from sanctions hearing below were in error about the way that “Signed for 1st class” post operated, however…
TOP 10 HALLOWEEN WORRIES FOR LAWYERS: TIME LIMITS, TRIAL BUNDLES AND WAKING UP IN THE MIDDLE OF THE NIGHT…
Today is a special day and I thought I’d start by looking at what scares lawyers most? This was discussed in 2017, there was another useful post on scary stuff in 2018. I have made a selection from the 2017…
THE DANGERS OF APPLYING FOR NON-PARTY COSTS ORDERS: THE APPLICANT HAS TO PAY THE PRICE: COURT OF APPEAL DECISION TODAY
In the judgment today in Deepchand & Anor v Sooben [2020] EWCA Civ 1409 the Court of Appeal overturned a decision that there be no order for costs when a party made an unsuccessful application for a non-party costs order. …
SERVE WITNESS STATEMENTS LATE AT YOUR PERIL: RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS NECESSARY AND LATE SERVICE IS NEARLY ALWAYS A SERIOUS BREACH
There are many interesting aspects of the judgment of HHJ Mithani QC in Patel & Anor v Barlows Solicitors (a firm) & Ors [2020] EWHC 2753 (Ch). Here I want to look at the part of the judgment that considers…
EXTENSION OF TIME TO APPEAL REFUSED: HIGH COURT DECISION TODAY
In the judgment today in Jamous v Mercouris [2020] EWHC 2814 (QB) Mr Justice Murray refused a claimant’s application for permission to appeal out of time. It is a reminder that applications of extensions of time to appeal are dealt…
CLAIMANT GIVEN RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS FOLLOWING BREACH OF PEREMPTORY ORDER (WITH NO FORMAL APPLICATION BEING MADE).
In Park v Hadi & Anor [2020] EWHC 2687 Mr Justice Freedman granted a defendant relief from sanctions in circumstances where there had been a breach of a peremptory order and no formal application had been made. THE CASE…
SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND STRIKING OUT: COVID MATTERS ARE A GOOD REASON TO DETERMINE ISSUES NOT DELAY THEM
In TKC London Ltd v Allianz Insurance PLC [2020] EWHC 2710 (Comm) Mr Richard Salter QC (sitting as a High Court Judge) considered the issue of whether issues relating to the COVID pandemic should be a factor in considering a…
COUNSEL PROHIBITED FROM ACTING FOR A PARTY: APPEAL UPHELD: A VERY RARE POWER EXERCISED
In Ahmed v Iqbal (Order Preventing Counsel from Acting) [2020] EWHC 2666 (Fam) Mr Justice Macdonald upheld a decision preventing counsel from acting for a party in family proceedings. THE CASE The father and mother were involved in proceedings under…
20 PIECES OF ADVICE FOR THE YOUNG LAWYER (& THE REST OF US): WITH A LITTLE HELP FROM MY FRIENDS
This week I have been concentrating on advice given by judges to lawyers. We are now moving on to advice given by lawyers for lawyers. I have selected twenty from dozens (possibly hundreds) of tweets given when I asked on…
ADDRESS FOR SERVICE: THE USE OF A POST OFFICE BOX NUMBER OR ACCOMODATION ADDRESS DOES NOT COMPLY WITH THE RULES: (ALSO – THE PRICE TAG FOR LITIGANTS IN PERSON)
In Smith v Marston Holdings Ltd & Anor [2020] EW Misc 23 (CC) HHJ Paul Matthews made some observations about the correct address for service when applications are issued. He also noted the issues that can arise when dealing with…
“A MOST UNUSUAL CASE”: “A JUDGE’S DRAFT JUDGMENT IS NOT AN INVITATION TO TREAT”
In FS v RS and JS [2020] EWFC 63 Sir James Munby warned against trying to re-open cases after judgment has been given. There were several attempts to re-open the judgment after it was given. It is the only judgment…
FUNDAMENTAL DISHONESTY AND WASTED COSTS AGAINST A SOLICITOR: THE BURDEN IS ON THE APPLICANT TO PROVE CAUSATION
The judgment of Mrs Justice Lambert in Razaq v Iqbal & Ors [2019] EWHC 3924 (QB) provides an interesting example of a failure to prove causation in a wasted costs application. A solicitor had been negligent in failing to pass…
VIDEO EVIDENCE NOT ALLOWED AT TRIAL: APPEAL AGAINST REFUSAL DISMISSED: A “STORM IN A TEACUP”
In Wilcox v King’s College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust [2020] EWHC 2555 (QB) Mrs Justice Lambert dismissed an appeal against a refusal by a defendant to allow video evidence to be adduced at trial. The evidence was not relevant and…
CLAIM FOR DAMAGES STRUCK OUT: APPLICATION TO AMEND REFUSED: CLAIMANT FAILED TO USE THEIR LOAF AS CLAIM IS SLICED…
The judgment of Mrs Justice Jefford in The Leicester Bakery (Holdings) Ltd v Ridge And Partners LLP [2020] EWHC 2430 (TCC) shows the necessity of being able to particularise a claim for damages. What it demonstrates is that, in claims…
You must be logged in to post a comment.