Civil Litigation Brief ®
Menu
  • Home
  • About
  • Membership Plans
  • Webinars
  • Login
Updates and Commentary on Civil Procedure, by Gordon Exall, Barrister, Kings Chambers
Browse: Home » Assessment of Costs » Page 8
LOOKING AT A SUMMARY ASSESSMENT: WHAT IS BEING ASSESSED? HOURLY RATES AND CAN LONDON SOLICITORS BE JUSTIFIED?

LOOKING AT A SUMMARY ASSESSMENT: WHAT IS BEING ASSESSED? HOURLY RATES AND CAN LONDON SOLICITORS BE JUSTIFIED?

August 25, 2021 · by gexall · in Assessment of Costs, Costs, Members Content, Summary assessment,

Sometimes it is interesting to see what happens in summary assessments.  Very few are reported and looking at those that are can help litigators get a “feel” for the process.  In this respect of the judgment of HHJ Matthews (sitting…

INCREASES IN HOURLY RATE AMOUNTS TO "SPECIAL REASONS" IN SOLICITORS ACT ASSESSMENT OF COSTS

INCREASES IN HOURLY RATE AMOUNTS TO “SPECIAL REASONS” IN SOLICITORS ACT ASSESSMENT OF COSTS

August 6, 2021 · by gexall · in Assessment of Costs, Costs, Members Content

In Raydens Ltd v Cole [2021] EWHC B14 (Costs) Costs Judge Leonard found that an increase in hourly rates meant that “special circumstances” established in a Solicitors Act assessment. “I do not believe that anyone in her position could reasonably…

YOU CANNOT PUT A CAVEAT WHEN ACCEPTING A PART 36 OFFER: CASE UNREASONABLY LEFT THE PORTAL: THE CLAIMANT "MISUNDERSTOOD THE RULES"

YOU CANNOT PUT A CAVEAT WHEN ACCEPTING A PART 36 OFFER: CASE UNREASONABLY LEFT THE PORTAL: THE CLAIMANT “MISUNDERSTOOD THE RULES”

August 1, 2021 · by gexall · in Assessment of Costs, Members Content

I am grateful to barrister James Miller for sending me a copy of the decision of Deputy Master Friston in Jimenez -v- Esure Services Limited (30th July 2021) a copy of which is available here. Jimenz -v- Esure THE CASE…

THE CIVIL JUSTICE COUNCIL FINAL REPORT ON GUIDELINE HOURLY RATES

THE CIVIL JUSTICE COUNCIL FINAL REPORT ON GUIDELINE HOURLY RATES

August 1, 2021 · by gexall · in Assessment of Costs, Costs, Members Content

The Civil Justice Council has produced its final report on guideline hourly rates.  This follows a consultation process following the interim report in January 2021. THE REPORT The report is available here.   THE RECOMMENDED RATES  … Enjoying this post?…

CONDITIONAL FEE AGREEMENT WAS NOT UNFAIR OR UNREASONABLE: SENIOR COURT COSTS OFFICE DECISION TODAY

CONDITIONAL FEE AGREEMENT WAS NOT UNFAIR OR UNREASONABLE: SENIOR COURT COSTS OFFICE DECISION TODAY

June 25, 2021 · by gexall · in Assessment of Costs, Conditional Fee Agreements, Costs, Members Content, Uncategorized

In Acupay System LLC v Stephenson Harwood LLP [2021] EWHC B11 (Costs) Costs Judge Leonard rejected a claimant’s argument that a conditional fee agreement it had entered into with a solicitor was unfair, unreasonable and not supported by consideration. (There…

Commencing Assessment Proceedings, Default Certificates and Drafting Points of Dispute: Where does it all go wrong? Webinar 30th June 2021

Commencing Assessment Proceedings, Default Certificates and Drafting Points of Dispute: Where does it all go wrong? Webinar 30th June 2021

June 23, 2021 · by gexall · in Assessment of Costs, Costs, Members Content, Webinar

Kings Chambers is presenting a webinar on the 30th June 2021 about avoiding problems in the assessment of costs process and the effective drafting of points of dispute. Booking details are available here.  THE WEBINAR In Grekor Fisken Ltd -v-…

THE ASSESSMENT OF COSTS: A "NEAR MISS" OFFER IS NOT ENOUGH

THE ASSESSMENT OF COSTS: A “NEAR MISS” OFFER IS NOT ENOUGH

June 17, 2021 · by gexall · in Assessment of Costs, Costs, Members Content, Part 36

In Mullaraj v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2021] EWHC B5 (Costs) Deputy Costs Judge Campbell rejected an argument that a “different order” for costs should be made following an assessment of costs.  The paying party had made…

"THE PROVISION OF THE CPR FOR SERVICE... SHOULD BE FAMILIAR TO EVERY SOLICITOR WHO CONDUCTS LITIGATION... THE MULTIPLE ERRORS MADE IN PURPORTING TO SERVE THE DEFENDANT COULD HAVE BEEN AVOIDED WITH A LITTLE DILIGENCE"

“THE PROVISION OF THE CPR FOR SERVICE… SHOULD BE FAMILIAR TO EVERY SOLICITOR WHO CONDUCTS LITIGATION… THE MULTIPLE ERRORS MADE IN PURPORTING TO SERVE THE DEFENDANT COULD HAVE BEEN AVOIDED WITH A LITTLE DILIGENCE”

June 15, 2021 · by gexall · in Assessment of Costs, Civil Procedure, Costs, Members Content, Service of the claim form, Serving documents

Although issues of service are a regular feature on this blog I cannot recall many cases about mis-service of Notice of Commencement of a Bill of Costs. There have been several recently.   The claimant failed to serve properly in Gregor…

THE SITUATION WHERE A PARTY SERVES ITS SCHEDULE OF COSTS LATE: CLAIMANT PERMITTED TO RECOVER COSTS, BUT THIS IS A POINT TO WATCH

THE SITUATION WHERE A PARTY SERVES ITS SCHEDULE OF COSTS LATE: CLAIMANT PERMITTED TO RECOVER COSTS, BUT THIS IS A POINT TO WATCH

May 19, 2021 · by gexall · in Applications, Assessment of Costs, Costs, Members Content

In Tribe v Elborne Mitchell LLP (Costs) [2021] EWHC 1252 (Ch) Deputy Master Raeburn considered the appropriate approach when a party serves a schedule of costs late.  Although the claimant was allowed to recover costs I report this case primarily…

DEFAULT COSTS CERTIFICATE NOT SET ASIDE: SERVICE BY EMAIL WAS WRONG, BUT RECTIFIABLE: RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS REFUSED

DEFAULT COSTS CERTIFICATE NOT SET ASIDE: SERVICE BY EMAIL WAS WRONG, BUT RECTIFIABLE: RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS REFUSED

May 13, 2021 · by gexall · in Appeals, Applications, Assessment of Costs, Costs, Members Content, Relief from sanctions, Service of the claim form, Serving documents, Setting aside judgment

Cases on Default Costs Certificates appear to be like London Buses – they come along in twos. Here we have the second case in two days.  In  Serbian Orthodox Church – Serbian Patriarchy v Kesar & Co [2021] EWHC 1205…

DEFENDANTS FAIL TO HAVE DEFAULT COSTS CERTIFICATE OF  US$3 MILLION SET ASIDE: DRAFT POINTS OF DISPUTE NOT AVAILABLE AT THE APPLICATION

DEFENDANTS FAIL TO HAVE DEFAULT COSTS CERTIFICATE OF US$3 MILLION SET ASIDE: DRAFT POINTS OF DISPUTE NOT AVAILABLE AT THE APPLICATION

May 12, 2021 · by gexall · in Applications, Assessment of Costs, Costs, Default judgment,, Members Content, Relief from sanctions

In  National Bank of Kazakhstan & Anor v The Bank of New York Mellon SA/NV, London Branch & Ors [2021] EWHC B7 (Costs) Costs Judge Rowley refused an application by the defendants to set aside a default costs certificate.  This…

APPLYING TO VARY A COSTS BUDGET: RULES AND PROCEDURE: WEBINAR 19th MAY 2021

APPLYING TO VARY A COSTS BUDGET: RULES AND PROCEDURE: WEBINAR 19th MAY 2021

April 14, 2021 · by gexall · in Assessment of Costs, Costs, Costs budgeting, Members Content, Webinar

On the 19th  May 2021 I am presenting a webinar on applying to vary a costs budget.  Booking details are available here.  WHAT THE WEBINAR COVERS Making sure that the budget is, and remains, correct is an important part of…

COURT ALLOWS ASSESSMENT OF SOLICITOR’S BILLS OUTSIDE 12 MONTHS: PUBLIC SPIRITED LITIGATION DOES NOT AMOUNT TO SPECIAL CIRCUMSTANCES

March 23, 2021 · by gexall · in Assessment of Costs, Costs, Members Content

I am grateful to Mark Carlisle  for sending me a copy of the judgment of Master Brown in Erlam -v- Edmonds Marshall McMahon Limited (SCCO – 19th November 2020 – a copy available here Erlam v Edmonds Marshall McMahon Ltd…

ARGUING ABOUT COSTS - WHEN YOURS ARE BIGGER THAN THEIRS

ARGUING ABOUT COSTS – WHEN YOURS ARE BIGGER THAN THEIRS

February 15, 2021 · by gexall · in Assessment of Costs, Costs, Members Content

In  HXA & Anor v Surrey County Council [2021] EWHC 250 (QB) Deputy Master Bagot QC struck out part of the claimant’s claim for damages against the defendant local authority.  This blog, however, is interested in the question of costs….

HOURLY RATES AND THE SUMMARY ASSESSMENT OF COSTS: SOME INTERESTING ISSUES

HOURLY RATES AND THE SUMMARY ASSESSMENT OF COSTS: SOME INTERESTING ISSUES

February 8, 2021 · by gexall · in Assessment of Costs, Costs, Members Content, Summary assessment,

In ABS Company Ltd v Pantaenius UK Ltd & Ors [2020] EWHC 3720 (Comm)  HHJ Pelling QC assessed costs at the end of a trial.  There are some interesting observations in relation to hourly rates, and the conduct of litigation…

SOLICITOR DID NOT HAVE GOOD GROUNDS TO TERMINATE THE RETAINER UNDER A CFA: CLAIM FOR £16,200 IN COSTS FAILS

SOLICITOR DID NOT HAVE GOOD GROUNDS TO TERMINATE THE RETAINER UNDER A CFA: CLAIM FOR £16,200 IN COSTS FAILS

February 1, 2021 · by gexall · in Applications, Assessment of Costs, Conditional Fee Agreements, Conduct, Costs, Members Content

I am returning to the judgment of Master Haworth in  Murray & Anor v Richard Slade and Company Ltd [2021] EWHC B3 (Costs). This time looking at the decision in relation to termination of a conditional fee agreement. The Master held…

AN OBJECT LESSON OF THE NEED TO CONFIRM VARIATIONS TO A RETAINER: COUNSEL'S FEES NOT RECOVERABLE: THE SOLICITOR WAS THE AUTHOR OF HIS OWN MISFORTUNE

AN OBJECT LESSON OF THE NEED TO CONFIRM VARIATIONS TO A RETAINER: COUNSEL’S FEES NOT RECOVERABLE: THE SOLICITOR WAS THE AUTHOR OF HIS OWN MISFORTUNE

January 31, 2021 · by gexall · in Assessment of Costs, Costs, Members Content

The judgment of Master Haworth in Murray & Anor v Richard Slade and Company Ltd [2021] EWHC B3 (Costs) could be seen as an object lesson to solicitors about confirming the terms of a retainer.  The Master did not allow…

PART 36 AND THE ASSESSMENT OF COSTS: CLAIMANT ALLOWED TO RAISE THE ISSUE LATE, BUT TO NO GREAT AVAIL

PART 36 AND THE ASSESSMENT OF COSTS: CLAIMANT ALLOWED TO RAISE THE ISSUE LATE, BUT TO NO GREAT AVAIL

January 29, 2021 · by gexall · in Assessment of Costs, Costs, Members Content, Part 36

In Best v Luton & Dunstable Hospital NHS Foundation Trust [2021] EWHC B2 (Costs) Costs Judge Leonard allowed a claimant to raise an argument as to Part 36 benefits following an offer in assessment proceedings.  However it was held that…

SOLICITOR AND OWN CLIENT ASSESSMENT: INTERIM BILLS ARE NOT STATUTE BILLS

SOLICITOR AND OWN CLIENT ASSESSMENT: INTERIM BILLS ARE NOT STATUTE BILLS

January 20, 2021 · by gexall · in Assessment of Costs, Costs, Members Content

In Masters v Charles Fussell & Co LLP [2021] EWHC B1 (Costs) Costs Judge Rowley found that bills rendered by the defendant solicitors were not final bills and the claimant retained a right to challenge those costs. ” in order…

NO INTEREST ON COSTS OF LOAN IN A PERSONAL INJURY CASE: THERE IS A POWER BUT THE COURT DID NOT EXERCISE ITS DISCRETION

NO INTEREST ON COSTS OF LOAN IN A PERSONAL INJURY CASE: THERE IS A POWER BUT THE COURT DID NOT EXERCISE ITS DISCRETION

December 22, 2020 · by gexall · in Assessment of Costs, Costs, Interest, Members Content

I am grateful to Paul Wainwright for sending me a copy of the judgment of District Judge Baldwin in Godfrey -v- Automotive Products Limited (17th December 2020). This decision, by the regional costs judge, considers whether a claimant in a…

COSTS LAWYERS BEWARE: COURT REFUSES TO SET ASIDE DEFAULT COSTS CERTIFICATE: "AVOIDABLE DELAY" IS NOT LOOKED AT KINDLY

COSTS LAWYERS BEWARE: COURT REFUSES TO SET ASIDE DEFAULT COSTS CERTIFICATE: “AVOIDABLE DELAY” IS NOT LOOKED AT KINDLY

December 17, 2020 · by gexall · in Applications, Assessment of Costs, Avoiding negligence claims, Civil Procedure, Costs, Extensions of time, Members Content, Relief from sanctions

In  Masten v London Britannia Hotel Ltd [2020] EWHC B31 (Costs) Mr Leonard refused to set aside a default costs certificate.  This serves as a salutary warning of the importance of time limits.  Further the Master observed that if a…

THE CHORLEY PRINCIPLE APPLIED TO A SOLICITOR WHO DID NOT HAVE THEIR OWN "FIRM": DEFENDANT HAD TO PAY CLAIMANT'S COSTS ON THE USUAL BASIS

THE CHORLEY PRINCIPLE APPLIED TO A SOLICITOR WHO DID NOT HAVE THEIR OWN “FIRM”: DEFENDANT HAD TO PAY CLAIMANT’S COSTS ON THE USUAL BASIS

December 11, 2020 · by gexall · in Assessment of Costs, Costs, Members Content

A post earlier this week considered the “Chorley” principle in relation to a solicitor litigating and recovering their costs. I am grateful to my colleague Matthew Smith for sending me a copy of the judgment of Master Rowley in the…

SUMMARY ASSESSMENT OF COSTS: WHAT TO DO IF YOU ARE PRESSED FOR TIME

SUMMARY ASSESSMENT OF COSTS: WHAT TO DO IF YOU ARE PRESSED FOR TIME

December 2, 2020 · by gexall · in Applications, Assessment of Costs, Costs, Members Content, Summary assessment,

I am looking again at the judgment of HHJ Hodge QC in  Cohen v Fine & Ors [2020] EWHC 3278 (Ch) a because, in concentrating on the issues relating to hourly rates, the other important part of the judgment may…

HOURLY RATES ALLOWED SHOULD BE INCREASED, AT LEAST, BY INFLATION: APPEAL AGAINST SUMMARY ASSESSMENT OF COSTS ALLOWED.

HOURLY RATES ALLOWED SHOULD BE INCREASED, AT LEAST, BY INFLATION: APPEAL AGAINST SUMMARY ASSESSMENT OF COSTS ALLOWED.

December 2, 2020 · by gexall · in Appeals, Assessment of Costs, Costs, Members Content, Summary assessment,

I am grateful to Sean Linley for drawing my attention to the judgment of HHJ Hodge QC in  Cohen v Fine & Ors [2020] EWHC 3278 (Ch).That judgment has some interesting things to say in relation to current hourly rates…

SOLICITOR AND OWN CLIENT COSTS: NO SENSE OF PROPORTIONALITY HERE: SOME BASIC POINTS ON BILLS

SOLICITOR AND OWN CLIENT COSTS: NO SENSE OF PROPORTIONALITY HERE: SOME BASIC POINTS ON BILLS

October 20, 2020 · by gexall · in Assessment of Costs, Costs, Costs budgeting, Members Content

In Belsner v Cam Legal Services Ltd [2020] EWHC 2755 (QB) the parties were arguing about £385.40.   The judge observed “According to their statements of costs, the Claimant and the Defendant have spent £52,575.63 and £35,139.70 respectively on this appeal. That…

GUIDELINE HOURLY RATES (NOT MUCH USE); CANARY WHARF (EXPENSIVE PLACE TO BE); EVIDENCE AND THE SEVEN PILLARS OF WISDOM (ALL FOR £750 AN HOUR)

GUIDELINE HOURLY RATES (NOT MUCH USE); CANARY WHARF (EXPENSIVE PLACE TO BE); EVIDENCE AND THE SEVEN PILLARS OF WISDOM (ALL FOR £750 AN HOUR)

October 8, 2020 · by gexall · in Assessment of Costs, Costs, Members Content

I am grateful to Tom Jenkinson from Bolt Burdon Kemp for sending me a copy of the decision of Master Rowley in Shulman -v- Kolomoisky (24/06/20) where the issue of the guideline hourly rates was determined.  A copy of the…

GUIDELINE HOURLY RATES CONSIDERED IN COURT OF PROTECTION: INFLATION CAN BE TAKEN INTO ACCOUNT ON ASSESSMENT

GUIDELINE HOURLY RATES CONSIDERED IN COURT OF PROTECTION: INFLATION CAN BE TAKEN INTO ACCOUNT ON ASSESSMENT

October 1, 2020 · by gexall · in Assessment of Costs, Civil Procedure, Costs, Members Content

In  PLK & Ors (Court of Protection : Costs) [2020] EWHC B28 (Costs) Master Whalan considered the appropriate hourly rate for Deputies in Court of Protection matters. (I am grateful to Carter Burnett, Costs Consultants, for bringing my attention to…

HEARINGS AND DETAILED ASSESSMENTS IN THE SENIOR COURTS COSTS OFFICE PRACTICE NOTE BY THE SENIOR COSTS JUDGE

July 31, 2020 · by gexall · in Assessment of Costs, Coronavirus, Costs, Members Content

Senior Costs Judge Gordon-Saker has issued a Practice Note in relation to Practice in the Senior Courts Costs Office.   “Introduction 1. As a result of the hard work and determination of the court staff and the willingness to adapt…

WHEN SHOULD INTEREST ON COSTS RUN FROM?  A DECISION THAT DOESN'T GO ALL AROUND THE GARDEN...

WHEN SHOULD INTEREST ON COSTS RUN FROM? A DECISION THAT DOESN’T GO ALL AROUND THE GARDEN…

July 13, 2020 · by gexall · in Assessment of Costs, Costs, Interest, Members Content

We looked at the decision of Senior Costs Judge Gordon-Saker in  Marbrow v Sharpes Garden Services Ltd [2020] EWHC B26 (Costs) last week in relation to the question of whether the costs budgeting caps were inclusive or exclusive of VAT.  There…

FARMER -v- THE CHIEF CONSTABLE OF LANCASHIRE: COSTS DISALLOWED IN FULL: FULL JUDGMENT NOW AVAILABLE

FARMER -v- THE CHIEF CONSTABLE OF LANCASHIRE: COSTS DISALLOWED IN FULL: FULL JUDGMENT NOW AVAILABLE

June 23, 2020 · by gexall · in Assessment of Costs, Conduct, Costs, Members Content

I wrote yesterday about the two useful articles on the case of  Farmer v The Chief Constable of Lancashire [2019] EWHC B18 (Costs). The full judgment is now available on BAILLI. “Anybody around this table being of the costs persuasion…

WHEN MISCONDUCT ON ASSESSMENT LEADS TO NO AWARD OF COSTS

WHEN MISCONDUCT ON ASSESSMENT LEADS TO NO AWARD OF COSTS

June 22, 2020 · by gexall · in Assessment of Costs, Conduct, Costs, Members Content

It is illuminating to read two reports of the case of Farmer -v- the Chief Constable of Lancashire, where a party’s conduct on assessment led to no award of costs being made. Indeed the claimant was ordered to pay the…

ACCEPTING AN OFFER DURING A HEARING: CONTRACTUAL PRINCIPLES, NOT PART 36, APPLY: OFFER DID NOT LAPSE AT THE DOOR OF THE COURT

ACCEPTING AN OFFER DURING A HEARING: CONTRACTUAL PRINCIPLES, NOT PART 36, APPLY: OFFER DID NOT LAPSE AT THE DOOR OF THE COURT

May 27, 2020 · by gexall · in Appeals, Assessment of Costs, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Part 36

Offers of settlement can, and often are, made outside the ambit of Part 36.  In MEF v St George’s Healthcare NHS Trust [2020] EWHC 1300 (QB) Mr Justice Morris considered issues relating to late acceptance of offers.  The case shows…

ASSESSMENT OF COSTS: UNDER SPEND OF A PHASE  -  NOT A GOOD REASON TO DEPART FROM THE BUDGET

ASSESSMENT OF COSTS: UNDER SPEND OF A PHASE – NOT A GOOD REASON TO DEPART FROM THE BUDGET

May 25, 2020 · by gexall · in Assessment of Costs, Costs, Costs budgeting, Members Content

In  Utting v City College Norwich [2020] EWHC B20 (Costs) Master Brown rejected an argument that an “underspend” amounted to a good reason to depart from a budget. I am grateful to Paul Kay from R Costings for drawing this…

GUIDANCE FOR THE CONDUCT OF REMOTE COSTS HEARINGS: READ ALL ABOUT IT

GUIDANCE FOR THE CONDUCT OF REMOTE COSTS HEARINGS: READ ALL ABOUT IT

April 23, 2020 · by gexall · in Assessment of Costs, Coronavirus, Costs, Members Content, Remote hearings

The Association of Cost Lawyers has a link on its site to agreed guidance for the Guidance of Remote Hearings. This is designed to ensure that assessments can continue remotely during social isolation.  Litigation Futures has a useful summary of…

MAKING SERIOUS SAVINGS ON TRAIN TRAVEL: ADVICE FROM A WELL TRAVELLED PROFESSOR : WHY FIRST CLASS IS SOMETIMES CHEAPER

MAKING SERIOUS SAVINGS ON TRAIN TRAVEL: ADVICE FROM A WELL TRAVELLED PROFESSOR : WHY FIRST CLASS IS SOMETIMES CHEAPER

February 24, 2020 · by gexall · in Applications, Assessment of Costs, Members Content

Last September there was a crowd-sourced post on this blog about  the best means of travel and accommodation for lawyers.  This is particular interest to litigators who who to travel for court hearings or meetings. When Professor Dominic Regan contacted…

STRIKING OUT POINTS OF DISPUTE BECAUSE OF LACK OF PARTICULARISATION: PARTIES HAVE TO KNOW WHAT IS IN DISPUTE AND WHY

STRIKING OUT POINTS OF DISPUTE BECAUSE OF LACK OF PARTICULARISATION: PARTIES HAVE TO KNOW WHAT IS IN DISPUTE AND WHY

February 20, 2020 · by gexall · in Appeals, Assessment of Costs, Case Management, Costs, Members Content

In Ainsworth v Stewarts Law LLP [2020] EWCA Civ 178 the Court of Appeal upheld a decision striking out part of points of dispute. “Common sense dictates that the points of dispute must be drafted in a way which enables…

FIXED COSTS OUSTED BY AGREEMENT: INSURER HAS TO STAND BY THE DEAL IT STRUCK

FIXED COSTS OUSTED BY AGREEMENT: INSURER HAS TO STAND BY THE DEAL IT STRUCK

February 12, 2020 · by gexall · in Applications, Assessment of Costs, Costs, Fixed Costs, Members Content, Personal Injury

I am grateful to barrister Andrew Roy  for sending me a copy of the decision of District Judge Baldwin (sitting as a Regional Costs Judge) in Turner -v- Cole (16th December 2019). It is a case where the judge held…

BILL OF COSTS STRUCK OUT IN FIXED COSTS CASE: CPR 36.20(11) GIVES RISE TO A "DIFFERENT, SELF-CONTAINED PROCEDURE" FOR DISPUTES AS TO DISBURSEMENTS

BILL OF COSTS STRUCK OUT IN FIXED COSTS CASE: CPR 36.20(11) GIVES RISE TO A “DIFFERENT, SELF-CONTAINED PROCEDURE” FOR DISPUTES AS TO DISBURSEMENTS

February 4, 2020 · by gexall · in Assessment of Costs, Costs, Fixed Costs, Members Content, Striking out

In Nema v Kirkland [2019] EWHC B15 (Costs) Master Leonard struck out a claimant’s bill of costs on the grounds that the action was subject to the fixed costs regime and an assessment should never have been sought. The rules…

THE COSTS OF PRE-ACTION DISCLOSURE: IS IT WORTH THE RISK? £40,000 SPENT IN COSTS FOR DOCUMENTS THAT WERE AVAILABLE UNDER GDPR

THE COSTS OF PRE-ACTION DISCLOSURE: IS IT WORTH THE RISK? £40,000 SPENT IN COSTS FOR DOCUMENTS THAT WERE AVAILABLE UNDER GDPR

February 2, 2020 · by gexall · in Applications, Assessment of Costs, Costs, Members Content, Summary assessment,

I am looking again at the decision in  Hussain v Medical Defence Union & Anor [2020] EWHC 157 (QB). This time I am looking at the order in relation to costs.  The application cost in excess of £40,000 in relation to…

A BAD DAY IN COURT FOR THE CLAIMANT'S SOLICITORS: COMPLICATED, OH SO COMPLICATED CFA AGREEMENTS: BREACHES OF THE INDEMNITY PRINCIPLE AND MISCONDUCT ON ASSESSMENT: AGREEMENTS "SO DARKLY PENNED AS TO BE INCOMPREHENSIBLE"

A BAD DAY IN COURT FOR THE CLAIMANT’S SOLICITORS: COMPLICATED, OH SO COMPLICATED CFA AGREEMENTS: BREACHES OF THE INDEMNITY PRINCIPLE AND MISCONDUCT ON ASSESSMENT: AGREEMENTS “SO DARKLY PENNED AS TO BE INCOMPREHENSIBLE”

January 27, 2020 · by gexall · in Assessment of Costs, Costs, Members Content

The judgment of Deputy Master Friston in Anthony v Collins [2020] EWHC B14 (Costs) makes for interesting reading.   A highly complex series of conditional fee agreements were held to be in breach of the indemnity principle.   There are important lessons…

2019 AND CIVIL PROCEDURE - A ROUND UP OF THE ROUND UPS: WHAT TO FRET ABOUT AND WHAT NOT TO FRET ABOUT...

2019 AND CIVIL PROCEDURE – A ROUND UP OF THE ROUND UPS: WHAT TO FRET ABOUT AND WHAT NOT TO FRET ABOUT…

December 31, 2019 · by gexall · in Assessment of Costs, Avoiding negligence claims, Bundles, Case Management, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Committal proceedings, Costs, Costs budgeting, Credibility of experts, Expert evidence, Experts, Members Content, Useful links, Witness statements, Written advocacy

There have been a series of annual reviews on key topics throughout December.  To round off the year it seemed a good idea to provide a reminder of them all and put the links in one place 2019 AND CIVIL…

A CASE THAT SHOULD BE READ BY EVERY LAWYER WHO BILLS CLIENTS: CLAIM £84,000 – GET £8,000: PROVIDE ADEQUATE ESTIMATES OF COSTS OR ELSE…

November 28, 2019 · by gexall · in Assessment of Costs, Costs, Members Content

The judgment of Master Leonard Dunbar v Virgo Consultancy Services Ltd [2019] EWHC B12 (Costs) provides an object lesson as to why lawyers must give a full and proper estimate of costs to their clients.  The defendant solicitor sought £84,ooo…

APPLYING FOR DISPENSATION FROM COURT FEES: TWO DIFFERENT CASES

APPLYING FOR DISPENSATION FROM COURT FEES: TWO DIFFERENT CASES

November 8, 2019 · by gexall · in Applications, Assessment of Costs, Costs, Court fees, Members Content

I am grateful to my colleague Paul Hughes for sending me a copy of the judgment of District Judge Jenkinson in the case of Stone -v- Allianz Insurance PLC where Paul acted for the defendant.  This, and the case of…

DEFECTIVE PART 36 OFFER MEANT CLAIMANT DID NOT OBTAIN PART 36 BENEFITS: WHY CLAIMANTS SHOULD DRAFT THEIR PART 36 OFFERS CAREFULLY

DEFECTIVE PART 36 OFFER MEANT CLAIMANT DID NOT OBTAIN PART 36 BENEFITS: WHY CLAIMANTS SHOULD DRAFT THEIR PART 36 OFFERS CAREFULLY

October 25, 2019 · by gexall · in Applications, Assessment of Costs, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Part 36

I am grateful to Simon Fisher from DWF costs for sending me a copy of the decision of District Judge Osborne in Flanagan -v- Royal & Sun Alliance Insurance PLC (16th May 2019). A copy of that case is available…

A CRI DE COEUR FOR MORE MONEY WON'T GET YOU AN INTERIM PAYMENT ON ACCOUNT OF COSTS: MASTER EMPHASISES THE NEED FOR HARD EVIDENCE

A CRI DE COEUR FOR MORE MONEY WON’T GET YOU AN INTERIM PAYMENT ON ACCOUNT OF COSTS: MASTER EMPHASISES THE NEED FOR HARD EVIDENCE

October 21, 2019 · by gexall · in Access to justice, Applications, Assessment of Costs, Costs, Interim Payments, Members Content

In RXK v Hampshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2019] EWHC 2751 (QB) Master Cook made some important observations about the quality of evidence needed to obtain an interim order for costs in an ongoing case. (The judgment in X -v-…

THE BACK TO BASICS SERIES: A RUNNING ACCOUNT: READ THEM ALL HERE

THE BACK TO BASICS SERIES: A RUNNING ACCOUNT: READ THEM ALL HERE

October 17, 2019 · by gexall · in Appeals, Applications, Assessment of Costs, Avoiding negligence claims, Bundles, Case Management, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Costs, Costs budgeting, Experts, Limitation, Members Content, QOCS, Relief from sanctions, Serving documents, Statements of Case, Statements of Truth, Witness statements

  The “Back to Basics” series, as the title suggests, deals with some of the basic elements of civil procedure. It covers everything from applications and bundles to the taking of witness statements.  The titles are often prompted by elements…

DISTRICT JUDGE SHOULD NOT HAVE "PARTIALLY" RECUSED THEMSELVES: THINGS THAT SHOULD NEVER HAVE BEEN IN A WITNESS STATEMENT: A VERY INTERESTING ASSESSMENT OF COSTS...

DISTRICT JUDGE SHOULD NOT HAVE “PARTIALLY” RECUSED THEMSELVES: THINGS THAT SHOULD NEVER HAVE BEEN IN A WITNESS STATEMENT: A VERY INTERESTING ASSESSMENT OF COSTS…

October 10, 2019 · by gexall · in Appeals, Applications, Assessment of Costs, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Costs, Members Content, Witness statements

I am grateful to Simon Fisher from DWF for providing me a copy of the judgment in Akers -v- Kirlkland [2019] EWHC 2176 (QB) Mr Justice Waksman discussed, in detail, the circumstances in which a judge should recuse themselves and…

SUMMARY ASSESSMENT AND HOURLY RATES: "SOLICITORS PROVIDING SUCH SKILL AND EXPERTISE ARE ENTITLED TO CHARGE THE MARKET HOURLY RATE FOR THEIR AREA OF PRACTICE"

SUMMARY ASSESSMENT AND HOURLY RATES: “SOLICITORS PROVIDING SUCH SKILL AND EXPERTISE ARE ENTITLED TO CHARGE THE MARKET HOURLY RATE FOR THEIR AREA OF PRACTICE”

October 4, 2019 · by gexall · in Applications, Assessment of Costs, Civil Procedure, Costs, Members Content, Summary assessment,

In  Ohpen Operations UK Ltd v Invesco Fund Managers Ltd [2019] EWHC 2504 (TCC) Mrs Justice O’Farrell carried out a summary assessment of costs.  She also had something to say in relation to hourly rates.  There is a succinct review…

ELECTRONIC WORKING IN THE SENIOR COURTS COSTS OFFICE: USEFUL LINKS

ELECTRONIC WORKING IN THE SENIOR COURTS COSTS OFFICE: USEFUL LINKS

October 2, 2019 · by gexall · in Assessment of Costs, Civil Procedure, Costs, Members Content, Rule Changes

The Electronic Working Pilot Scheme in the Senior Courts Costs Office  comes into force on the 7th October. There are some useful links on the working of the sceme. USEFUL LINKS A summary on the Courts and Tribunal Judiciary website …

CIVIL PROCEDURE, COSTS, EVIDENCE AND - DINOSAURS : A REVIEW OF THE MONTH -  ARTICLES AND POSTS (SEPTEMBER 2019)

CIVIL PROCEDURE, COSTS, EVIDENCE AND – DINOSAURS : A REVIEW OF THE MONTH – ARTICLES AND POSTS (SEPTEMBER 2019)

September 29, 2019 · by gexall · in Applications, Assessment of Costs, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Useful links

Every month I plan to provide links to useful articles and posts on civil procedure.   I am happy for anyone to send me links that are relevant to the topics that this blog covers.  (Links to  posts does not constitute…

← Previous 1 … 7 8 9 … 12 Next →

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email. Subscription notifies you of a new post, it does not give you access to members' content.

Join 12.3K other subscribers

Recent Posts

  • COST BITES 448: PART 36 AND FIXED COSTS: “VERY LATE” ACCEPTANCE OF A DEFENDANT’S OFFER LEADS TO THE CLAIMANT RECOVERING NO COSTS AT ALL
  • COST BITES 447: “THESE SUMS ARE ASTONISHING”: COURT OF APPEAL CONSIDERS £2 MILLION BRIEF FEE AND COSTS OF A FOUR-DAY APPEAL (AND IS NOT TOO IMPRESSED)
  • SERVICE POINTS 56 : PERSONAL SERVICE NOT EFFECTED: COURT RETROSPECTIVELY APPROVES ALTERNATIVE SERVICE OF DOCUMENTS IN CONTEMPT PROCEEDINGS
  • DID YOU KNOW THAT YOU COULD BE MADE BANKRUPT (OSTENSIBLY ON YOUR OWN APPLICATION), NOT KNOW ANYTHING ABOUT IT – AND THEN HAVE TO PAY THE TRUSTEE’S COSTS? THE IMPORTANCE OF GETTING KEY EVIDENCE BEFORE THE COURT
  • THROWBACK FRIDAY: A CASE WHERE THE SOLICITORS’ EVIDENCE (OF THEIR OWN) LOSS WAS “WHOLLY INADEQUATE” (OCTOBER 2017)

Top Posts

COST BITES 447: “THESE SUMS ARE ASTONISHING”: COURT OF APPEAL CONSIDERS £2 MILLION BRIEF FEE AND COSTS OF A FOUR-DAY APPEAL (AND IS NOT TOO IMPRESSED)
SERVICE POINTS 55: THE SOLICITORS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL FINDS THAT A SOLICITOR WAS TELLING LIES ABOUT SERVICE: SOLICITOR STRUCK OFF (DON'T LET THIS HAPPEN TO YOU...)
EXPERT WATCH 78 : "ROWING BACK"?: WHEN AN EXPERT CHANGES THEIR VIEW AFTER THE JOINT REPORT: "THAT IS NOT THE FAIR OR PROPER WAY FOR PUTTING NEW EXPERT EVIDENCE BEFORE THE COURT"
CONDITIONAL FEE AGREEMENTS, CHANGE OF SOLICITORS AND RATIFICATION AND INFORMED ADVICE: IT IS NOT SO EASY TO SIMPLY RECOMMEND A CHANGE OF SOLICITORS...
DID YOU KNOW THAT YOU COULD BE MADE BANKRUPT (OSTENSIBLY ON YOUR OWN APPLICATION), NOT KNOW ANYTHING ABOUT IT - AND THEN HAVE TO PAY THE TRUSTEE'S COSTS? THE IMPORTANCE OF GETTING KEY EVIDENCE BEFORE THE COURT

Archives

Blogroll

  • Fatal Accident Law
  • Legal Futures
  • Personal injury: Liability and Damages

Books

  • Munkman & Exall on Damages for Personal Injuries and Death 15th ed
  • The APIL Guide to Fatal Accidents 4th edition

Useful Links

  • Buntools (for preparing PDF Bundles)
  • Kings Chambers
  • Kings Chambers Costs & Litigation Funding
  • Kings Chambers Serious Injury
  • The Civil Procedure Rules
  • The Law Society Gazette
  • The National Archives Recently Published Judgments
  • The Senior Court Costs Office Guide 2025
  • www.Bailii.org

Copyright

© Gordon Exall, Exall Legal Training, Civil Litigation Brief, 2013-2026. Unauthorised use and or duplication of the material contained on this blog without permission is strictly prohibited.
Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.

To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
  • Membership Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Advertising Policy
  • Copyright
  • Legal Disclaimer

Copyright © 2026 Civil Litigation Brief ®

Powered by Big Yellow Workshop

Loading Comments...

You must be logged in to post a comment.