Civil Litigation Brief ®
Menu
  • Home
  • About
  • Membership Plans
  • Webinars
  • Login
Updates and Commentary on Civil Procedure, by Gordon Exall, Barrister, Kings Chambers
Browse: Home » Civil Procedure » Page 40
"WHEN MUST AN UNSUCCESSFUL LITIGANT ACCEPT "NO" FOR AN ANSWER?": COURT OF APPEAL DECISION

“WHEN MUST AN UNSUCCESSFUL LITIGANT ACCEPT “NO” FOR AN ANSWER?”: COURT OF APPEAL DECISION

December 1, 2020 · by gexall · in Access to justice, Appeals, Civil Procedure, Members Content

In Wingfield, R (on the application of) v Canterbury City Council & Anor [2020] EWCA Civ 1588 the Court of Appeal considered the provisions of CPR 52.30 which provide an extremely limited chance of persuading a court to reconsider a…

HOW TO LOSE A CASE: SILKY GUIDANCE: IGNORE THE FACTS (THAT ALWAYS HELPS)

November 29, 2020 · by gexall · in Advocacy, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Useful links

Today I am encouraging you to read one of the most authoritative  and witty articles I have read about being involved in the civil litigation process.  How to Lose a Case is a post by Edmund King QC on the…

A PANDEMIC DOESN'T STOP YOU TICKING A BOX: DEFENDANT'S APPLICATION FOR ADJOURNMENT OF DEFAULT JUDGMENT APPLICATION REFUSED

A PANDEMIC DOESN’T STOP YOU TICKING A BOX: DEFENDANT’S APPLICATION FOR ADJOURNMENT OF DEFAULT JUDGMENT APPLICATION REFUSED

November 27, 2020 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil Procedure, Default judgment,, Members Content

In Glenn v Kline [2020] EWHC 3182 (QB) Mr Justice Nicklin refused the defendant’s application for an adjournment of an application for judgement in default of acknowledgement of service.  The reasons provided by the defendant, including COVID, did not provide…

IF YOU WANT RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS - PUT THE DEFAULT RIGHT AT ONCE, AND  CERTAINLY WELL BEFORE ANY APPLICATION FOR RELIEF: DEFENDANT FAILS ON APPEAL WHEN WITNESS EVIDENCE SERVED LATE

IF YOU WANT RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS – PUT THE DEFAULT RIGHT AT ONCE, AND CERTAINLY WELL BEFORE ANY APPLICATION FOR RELIEF: DEFENDANT FAILS ON APPEAL WHEN WITNESS EVIDENCE SERVED LATE

November 24, 2020 · by gexall · in Avoiding negligence claims, Case Management, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Relief from sanctions, Witness statements

In the many posts I have written about seeking relief from sanctions one matter that has been stressed is the overwhelming importance of rectifying the breach immediately. The dangers of  not doing so are exemplified in the judgment of Mr…

WEARING FACEMASKS IN THE COURTROOM: A MATTER OF CHOICE FOR BOTH THE JUDGE AND OTHER PARTICIPANTS (UNLESS ACTUALLY SPEAKING)

WEARING FACEMASKS IN THE COURTROOM: A MATTER OF CHOICE FOR BOTH THE JUDGE AND OTHER PARTICIPANTS (UNLESS ACTUALLY SPEAKING)

November 19, 2020 · by gexall · in Civil Procedure, Coronavirus, Members Content

The Senior and Deputy Senior Presiding Judges at the Royal Courts of Justice issued guidance on the 17th November 2020 which replaced earlier guidance on this topic.  The guidance deals with wearing facemasks in the court room. THE GUIDANCE “Wearing…

COURT REFUSES PARTY PERMISSION TO RELY ON WITNESS STATEMENT SERVED LATE

COURT REFUSES PARTY PERMISSION TO RELY ON WITNESS STATEMENT SERVED LATE

November 18, 2020 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Relief from sanctions, Witness statements

In RGB Plastering Ltd v TAWE Drylining and Plastering Ltd [2020] EWHC 3028 (TCC)  HHJ Jarman QC (sitting as a judge of the High Court) refused the defendant permission to rely on a witness statement that was served late. “Ms…

CORONAVIRUS LAW: FURTHER STATUTORY STAY ON EVICTIONS AND TAKING CONTROL OF GOODS

CORONAVIRUS LAW: FURTHER STATUTORY STAY ON EVICTIONS AND TAKING CONTROL OF GOODS

November 16, 2020 · by gexall · in Civil Procedure, Coronavirus, Members Content

The Public Health (Coronavirus) (Protection from Eviction and Taking Control of Goods) (England) Regulations 2020 come into force tomorrow. They prevent residential evictions (for the most part) until the 11th January 2021. THE REGULATIONS Citation, Commencement and Application 1.—(1) These Reg……

ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF SERVICE FILED LATE - BUT JUDGMENT IN DEFAULT WAS IRREGULAR AND SET ASIDE: A REMINDER THAT THE RULES HAVE CHANGED

ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF SERVICE FILED LATE – BUT JUDGMENT IN DEFAULT WAS IRREGULAR AND SET ASIDE: A REMINDER THAT THE RULES HAVE CHANGED

November 12, 2020 · by gexall · in Appeals, Civil Procedure, Default judgment,, Members Content, Setting aside judgment

The judgment of Mr Justice Choudhury in  MB v RBG [2020] EWHC 3022 (QB) is the first I have seen considering the new provisions of CPR 12.3 and the circumstances in which a default judgment can be set aside.  It…

THE APPROACH OF THE COURT AT TRIAL WHEN A PARTY HAS NOT GIVEN DISCLOSURE: THE BENEFIT OF DOUBT IS AGAINST THEM

THE APPROACH OF THE COURT AT TRIAL WHEN A PARTY HAS NOT GIVEN DISCLOSURE: THE BENEFIT OF DOUBT IS AGAINST THEM

November 6, 2020 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Disclosure, Members Content, Sanctions

In Aegean Baltic Bank SA v Renzlor Shipping Ltd [2020] EWHC 2851 (Comm) Mr Adrian Beltrami QC (sitting as a Judge of the High Court) considered the appropriate approach at trial when a party has been debarred from calling evidence….

"A MARKED 'DISCONNECT' BETWEEN THE RESPONDENT'S WRITTEN EVIDENCE AND HIS ORAL TESTIMONY": ANOTHER "ARGUMENTATIVE" WITNESS STATEMENT BITES THE DUST

“A MARKED ‘DISCONNECT’ BETWEEN THE RESPONDENT’S WRITTEN EVIDENCE AND HIS ORAL TESTIMONY”: ANOTHER “ARGUMENTATIVE” WITNESS STATEMENT BITES THE DUST

November 5, 2020 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Witness statements

The judgment of ICC Judge Barber in Leopard v Robinson [2020] EWHC 2928 (Ch) provides another example of a written witness statement being misused. The judge held that the statement consisted of “assertions and legal submissions”. These have no place…

"THE DOG ATE MY HOMEWORK" EXCUSE DOESN'T WORK WELL IN COURT: THE JUDGE MAY HAVE BEEN WRONG ABOUT THE WAY "SIGNED FOR 1ST CLASS" OPERATED BUT THEY WERE RIGHT TO REFUSE RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS: COURT OF APPEAL DECIION

“THE DOG ATE MY HOMEWORK” EXCUSE DOESN’T WORK WELL IN COURT: THE JUDGE MAY HAVE BEEN WRONG ABOUT THE WAY “SIGNED FOR 1ST CLASS” OPERATED BUT THEY WERE RIGHT TO REFUSE RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS: COURT OF APPEAL DECIION

November 4, 2020 · by gexall · in Appeals, Applications, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Damages, Members Content, Relief from sanctions, Sanctions

In Diriye v Bojaj & Anor [2020] EWCA Civ 1400 the Court of Appeal held that the judges who heard a relief from sanctions hearing below were in error about the way that “Signed for 1st class” post operated, however…

PROCEEDINGS BROUGHT BY BANKRUPT WERE “DOOMED TO FAIL”: AN IMPORTANT REMINDER

November 2, 2020 · by gexall · in Civil Procedure, Insolvency, Members Content

Part of the judgment of Mr Justice Griffiths in Lambert v Forest of Dean District Council [2020] EWHC 2854 (Admin) provides an important reminder that someone who has been declared bankrupt may have no standing at all to bring subsequent…

CIVIL PROCEDURE: BLOG AND ARTICLES ROUND UP OCTOBER 2020

CIVIL PROCEDURE: BLOG AND ARTICLES ROUND UP OCTOBER 2020

October 31, 2020 · by gexall · in Case Management, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Useful links

This round up covers specific posts and articles in relation to civil procedure .  There is a monthly round up of a wide range of legal issues and coronavirus on the Kings Chambers blog, Coronavirus: Guidance for Lawyers and Business….

PART 36: JUDGE WAS WRONG NOT TO ALLOW ENHANCED INTEREST WHEN CLAIMANT BEAT ITS OWN OFFER: COURT OF APPEAL DECISION

PART 36: JUDGE WAS WRONG NOT TO ALLOW ENHANCED INTEREST WHEN CLAIMANT BEAT ITS OWN OFFER: COURT OF APPEAL DECISION

October 29, 2020 · by gexall · in Appeals, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Part 36

In the judgment today in Telefonica UK Ltd v The Office of Communications [2020] EWCA Civ 1374 the Court of Appeal overturned the decision of the trial judge not to award additional interest on damages and costs in a case…

CORONAVIRUS AND CIVIL PROCEDURE: THE PRACTICE DIRECTION ENDS TOMORROW: REVIEW OF THE CASES

CORONAVIRUS AND CIVIL PROCEDURE: THE PRACTICE DIRECTION ENDS TOMORROW: REVIEW OF THE CASES

October 29, 2020 · by gexall · in Amendment, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Coronavirus, Members Content

Practice Direction 51ZA which allows parties to extend time limits for up to 56 days comes to an end on the 30th October 2020.   Unless there is a further rule change then parties can only agree extensions of 28 days. …

GOING FOR A SONG: THE DANGERS OF DOING NOTHING WHEN PART 18 QUESTIONS ARE SERVED, AND ARGUING "NOT" ENTITLED WHEN A COURT ORDER HAS BEEN MADE:

GOING FOR A SONG: THE DANGERS OF DOING NOTHING WHEN PART 18 QUESTIONS ARE SERVED, AND ARGUING “NOT” ENTITLED WHEN A COURT ORDER HAS BEEN MADE:

October 28, 2020 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Relief from sanctions

The judgment of Master Kay in Sheeran & Ors v Chokri & Ors [2020] EWHC 2806 (Ch) provides an important reminder that a Part 18 request cannot simply be ignored.  Further once a court makes an order that a party…

COURT SET ASIDE A JUDGMENT OBTAINED 10 YEARS LATER: COURT FINDS THAT DOCUMENTS WERE FORGED BY DEFENDANTS: ANOTHER ROUND IN A BARE KNUCKLE FIGHT

COURT SET ASIDE A JUDGMENT OBTAINED 10 YEARS LATER: COURT FINDS THAT DOCUMENTS WERE FORGED BY DEFENDANTS: ANOTHER ROUND IN A BARE KNUCKLE FIGHT

October 26, 2020 · by gexall · in Civil Procedure, Members Content, Setting aside judgment

In March last year I wrote about the Supreme Court’s decision in Takhar v Gracefield Developments Ltd & Ors [2019] UKSC 13. In that case the Supreme Court held that a claimant could bring an action to set aside an earlier judgment which,…

PROVING THINGS 184: PROVING YOU CAN'T A CLAIM WILL BE "STIFLED"  REQUIRES A DETAILED EXPLANATION

PROVING THINGS 184: PROVING YOU CAN’T A CLAIM WILL BE “STIFLED” REQUIRES A DETAILED EXPLANATION

October 26, 2020 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Setting aside judgment

In National Tourism Council of Qatar v Mehdiyev [2020] EWHC 2638 (Ch) Deputy Master Hansen considered the defendant’s evidence as to means when deciding whether or not to impose terms when setting aside a judgment.  It is important to note…

“ALL MATTERS WERE INFECTED FROM THE OUTSET WITH A REGRETTABLE INJUDICIOUS AND PEREMPTORY LACK OF PROFESSIONAL ASSIDUOUSNESS” : FROM AN ORGANISATION THAT SHOULD KNOW MUCH, MUCH, BETTER: JUST TAKE A WITNESS STATEMENT

October 22, 2020 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Conduct, Members Content, Witness statements

This blog has looked, many times, at cases that have floundered at trial because of basic failures to investigate the primary facts.  Sometimes applications fail because of a fundamental lack of knowledge as to what “facts” are.    The judgment…

LIFE IN LAW ISN'T ALWAYS GLAMOROUS:  A CLIENT CAN BLAME THEIR LAWYER (OR FORMER LAWYER) FOR THEIR WITNESS STATEMENT

LIFE IN LAW ISN’T ALWAYS GLAMOROUS: A CLIENT CAN BLAME THEIR LAWYER (OR FORMER LAWYER) FOR THEIR WITNESS STATEMENT

October 19, 2020 · by gexall · in Avoiding negligence claims, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Fundamental Dishonesty, Members Content, Witness statements

A classic example of a client seeking to blame their lawyer for the contents of a witness statement can be seen in the judgment in  Simpson v Payne, reported in the PI Brief Update Law Journal.   THE CASE The claimant…

20 PIECES OF ADVICE FOR THE YOUNG LAWYER (& THE REST OF US): WITH A LITTLE HELP FROM MY FRIENDS

20 PIECES OF ADVICE FOR THE YOUNG LAWYER (& THE REST OF US): WITH A LITTLE HELP FROM MY FRIENDS

October 9, 2020 · by gexall · in Advocacy, Applications, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Useful links, Well being, Witness statements

This week I have been concentrating on advice given by judges to lawyers.  We are now moving on to advice given by lawyers for lawyers.  I have selected twenty from dozens (possibly hundreds) of tweets given when I asked on…

A FURTHER TEN PIECES OF ADVICE FOR THE YOUNG, AND NOT SO YOUNG, LAWYER: AVOIDING THAT "SPECIAL RING IN HELL"

A FURTHER TEN PIECES OF ADVICE FOR THE YOUNG, AND NOT SO YOUNG, LAWYER: AVOIDING THAT “SPECIAL RING IN HELL”

October 8, 2020 · by gexall · in Advocacy, Avoiding negligence claims, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Useful links

Continuing with the  review of those series on this site which  collate the guidance that judges have given to lawyers.  In series three we looked at everything from going to hell; brevity (the absence of which leads you rapidly towards…

TEN MORE PIECES OF ADVICE FOR THE YOUNG LAWYER: "INCIVILITY IS COUNTERPRODUCTIVE": "BE BRIEF"; "DON'T CRUMBLE"

TEN MORE PIECES OF ADVICE FOR THE YOUNG LAWYER: “INCIVILITY IS COUNTERPRODUCTIVE”: “BE BRIEF”; “DON’T CRUMBLE”

October 7, 2020 · by gexall · in Advocacy, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Useful links, Written advocacy

I am using this week to look back a previous series where guidance was given, primarily by judges, to young advocates.  There are links here to the original posts, and sources for the posts.  Here we look at the second…

TEN KEY PIECES OF ADVICE STRAIGHT FROM THE JUDICIARY FOR THE NEWLY MINTED LAWYER (WHICH MAY ALSO HELP THE REST OF US)

TEN KEY PIECES OF ADVICE STRAIGHT FROM THE JUDICIARY FOR THE NEWLY MINTED LAWYER (WHICH MAY ALSO HELP THE REST OF US)

October 6, 2020 · by gexall · in Advocacy, Avoiding negligence claims, Civil Procedure, Members Content

Following on from the post yesterday aimed at those about to start their training contracts or pupillage this would seem to be a good time to remind people of the number of  series there are on this site about advocacy. …

THE CHILD CLAIMANT AND FATAL ACCIDENT LITIGATION: WEBINAR 8th DECEMBER 2020

THE CHILD CLAIMANT AND FATAL ACCIDENT LITIGATION: WEBINAR 8th DECEMBER 2020

October 5, 2020 · by gexall · in Civil Procedure, Fatal Accidents, Members Content, Webinar

I am giving a webinar on the 8th December 2020.  I wanted to look at the particular issues facing a child claimant in a fatal accident case.   There are quite complex principles governing the losses involved.  Booking details are available…

WHAT THEY DIDN'T TEACH YOU AT LAW SCHOOL: 10 KEY POSTS FOR THOSE JUST STARTING OFF (AND THE REST OF US TO BE HONEST)

WHAT THEY DIDN’T TEACH YOU AT LAW SCHOOL: 10 KEY POSTS FOR THOSE JUST STARTING OFF (AND THE REST OF US TO BE HONEST)

October 5, 2020 · by gexall · in Avoiding negligence claims, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Useful links

The transition from learning to practice is not an easy one.  It is even more difficult for litigators starting their careers now –  with training contracts and pupillage being delayed because of COVID problems.   Even if training has started much…

THE PERILS OF THE LAWYER SIGNING THE STATEMENT OF TRUTH: A NECESSARY REPEAT

THE PERILS OF THE LAWYER SIGNING THE STATEMENT OF TRUTH: A NECESSARY REPEAT

October 4, 2020 · by gexall · in Avoiding negligence claims, Civil Procedure, Committal proceedings, Members Content

The previous post about the judgment in North of England Coachworks Ltd v Khan [2020] EWHC 2596 (QB) gives me an opportunity to repeat earlier advice pm the blog in relation to the lawyer signing the statement of truth. In the…

"LITIGANTS SHOULD BE TERRIFIED IF THEY LIE TO THE COURT": THE IMPORTANCE OF THE STATEMENT OF TRUTH

“LITIGANTS SHOULD BE TERRIFIED IF THEY LIE TO THE COURT”: THE IMPORTANCE OF THE STATEMENT OF TRUTH

October 4, 2020 · by gexall · in Civil Procedure, Committal proceedings, Members Content, Statements of Truth

There are many, many cases about committal proceedings in commercial cases.  Some judges have observed that they appear to be used tactically.   Most are confined to their own facts. However in North of England Coachworks Ltd v Khan [2020] EWHC…

ODE TO A DYING CORPORATION: "THE SMELL OF CORDITE, GUN POWDER AND NAPALM NO LONGER FILLS THE AIR"

ODE TO A DYING CORPORATION: “THE SMELL OF CORDITE, GUN POWDER AND NAPALM NO LONGER FILLS THE AIR”

October 2, 2020 · by gexall · in Civil Procedure, Members Content

The heading of the judgment of Master Sanderson in Bell Group (UK) Holdings Limited (In Liquidation) [2020] WASC 347 includes “Corporations law – Ode to a dying corporation – Turns on own facts”.  This led me to want to investigate…

PROPORTIONAL COSTS: THE LITIGATOR'S WATCHWORDS: 12 PRACTICAL STEPS FOR THE PRUDENT LAWYER...

PROPORTIONAL COSTS: THE LITIGATOR’S WATCHWORDS: 12 PRACTICAL STEPS FOR THE PRUDENT LAWYER…

October 2, 2020 · by gexall · in Case Management, Civil Procedure, Costs, Members Content, Proportionality

The issue of “proportionality” is central to contemporary litigation.  However it is rarely examined in detail and rarely discussed.  Attempts to analyse how proportionality can be achieved are even rarer.   Here I reprise some points made several years ago about…

GUIDELINE HOURLY RATES CONSIDERED IN COURT OF PROTECTION: INFLATION CAN BE TAKEN INTO ACCOUNT ON ASSESSMENT

GUIDELINE HOURLY RATES CONSIDERED IN COURT OF PROTECTION: INFLATION CAN BE TAKEN INTO ACCOUNT ON ASSESSMENT

October 1, 2020 · by gexall · in Assessment of Costs, Civil Procedure, Costs, Members Content

In  PLK & Ors (Court of Protection : Costs) [2020] EWHC B28 (Costs) Master Whalan considered the appropriate hourly rate for Deputies in Court of Protection matters. (I am grateful to Carter Burnett, Costs Consultants, for bringing my attention to…

CIVIL PROCEDURE: BLOG AND ARTICLES ROUND UP - SEPTEMBER 2020

CIVIL PROCEDURE: BLOG AND ARTICLES ROUND UP – SEPTEMBER 2020

September 30, 2020 · by gexall · in Civil Procedure, Coronavirus, Members Content, Useful links

This round up also covers specific posts and articles in relation to coronavirus. There will no longer be a specific round up covering coronavirus and and civil procedure.  There is, however, a monthly round up of a wide range of…

CIVIL PROCEDURE BACK TO BASICS 86: PRE-ACTION ADMISSIONS: THE DANGERS OF NOT MAKING THEM AND THE CONSEQUENCES IF YOU DO

CIVIL PROCEDURE BACK TO BASICS 86: PRE-ACTION ADMISSIONS: THE DANGERS OF NOT MAKING THEM AND THE CONSEQUENCES IF YOU DO

September 28, 2020 · by gexall · in Admissions, Civil Procedure, Members Content

The judgment in Greater Manchester Fire and Rescue Service v Veevers [2020] EWHC 2550 (Comm) HHJ Pearce emphasises the point that a party can make a formal pre-action admission.  A party who tries an alternative “non-formal” admission may well not get…

CIVIL LITIGATION BRIEF 25 YEARS AGO:  A QUARTER OF A CENTURY OF CIVIL PROCEDURE

CIVIL LITIGATION BRIEF 25 YEARS AGO: A QUARTER OF A CENTURY OF CIVIL PROCEDURE

September 25, 2020 · by gexall · in Civil Procedure, Members Content, Striking out

Nobody knew what a “blog” was 25 years ago. However at that time Civil Litigation Brief  did exist, it was a monthly column in the Solicitors Journal.  It is interesting to see how much (or how little) matters have moved…

CIVIL PROCEDURE BACK TO BASICS  85: DIRECTIONS AND COURT ORDERS SHOULD BE "REALISTIC AND ACHIEVABLE"

CIVIL PROCEDURE BACK TO BASICS 85: DIRECTIONS AND COURT ORDERS SHOULD BE “REALISTIC AND ACHIEVABLE”

September 22, 2020 · by gexall · in Case Management, Civil Procedure, Members Content

One aspect of the Denton decision that is often overlooked, but which was very welcome, was the Court of Appeal’s message to the courts (and the parties) that any directions given should be “realistic and achievable.”   WHAT WAS SAID…

SEEK PERMISSION TO APPEAL PROMPTLY (AND TELL THE JUDGE ABOUT IT): "A close analysis of the parties' cases thus reveals a fractal pattern of progressively complex and ever-finer recursive detail of sharply declining significance."

SEEK PERMISSION TO APPEAL PROMPTLY (AND TELL THE JUDGE ABOUT IT): “A close analysis of the parties’ cases thus reveals a fractal pattern of progressively complex and ever-finer recursive detail of sharply declining significance.”

September 20, 2020 · by gexall · in Appeals, Applications, Civil Procedure, Conduct, Members Content

The judgment of Mr Justice Turner in  Município De Mariana & Ors v BHP Group Plc & Anor [2020] EWHC 2471 (TCC) discloses an unusual turn of events in relation to an appeal. It contains some important observations about the…

CIVIL PROCEDURE BACK TO BASICS 84: HOW NOT TO MAKE A PART 36 OFFER THAT IS NOT VALID:

CIVIL PROCEDURE BACK TO BASICS 84: HOW NOT TO MAKE A PART 36 OFFER THAT IS NOT VALID:

September 17, 2020 · by gexall · in Avoiding negligence claims, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Part 36

You may not care to believe it but the title of this post is deliberate, there is a double negative and a lack of clarity.  This reflects  the ambiguities and uncertainties in many of the attempts at Part 36 offers…

SETTING ASIDE  A REGULAR JUDGMENT: TWO HURDLES FOR THE APPLICANT TO CLEAR - AND EVEN THEN THERE CAN BE CONDITIONS

SETTING ASIDE A REGULAR JUDGMENT: TWO HURDLES FOR THE APPLICANT TO CLEAR – AND EVEN THEN THERE CAN BE CONDITIONS

September 16, 2020 · by gexall · in Civil Procedure, Members Content, Sanctions, Setting aside judgment

The judgment of Master Kaye in  Penta Ultimate Holdings Ltd & Anor v Storrier [2020] EWHC 2400 (Ch) is a reminder that a party attempting to set aside a regular judgment has two hurdles to clear: the test set out…

PART 18 REQUEST FOR INFORMATION ABOUT DAMAGES REFUSED: "NEITHER REASONABLE OR PROPORTIONATE"

PART 18 REQUEST FOR INFORMATION ABOUT DAMAGES REFUSED: “NEITHER REASONABLE OR PROPORTIONATE”

September 15, 2020 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Statements of Case

In Kings Security Systems Ltd v King & Anor [2019] EWHC 3620 (Ch) Master Kaye refused an application that a party provide further information in relation to damages. “Part 18 requests should be for the purpose of providing further information…

JUDGE SHOULD NOT HAVE GRANTED DEFENDANT PERMISSION TO WITHDRAW FROM ADMISSIONS: CHANGE OF LAW DID NOT JUSTIFY CHANGE OF STANCE

JUDGE SHOULD NOT HAVE GRANTED DEFENDANT PERMISSION TO WITHDRAW FROM ADMISSIONS: CHANGE OF LAW DID NOT JUSTIFY CHANGE OF STANCE

September 14, 2020 · by gexall · in Admissions, Civil Procedure, Members Content

In the judgment today in J v A South Wales Local Authority [2020] EWHC 2362 (Admin) Mr Justice Marcus Smith overturned a decision granting a defendant permission to withdraw admissions. ” changes in the law are to be anticipated, particularly…

CHILDREN AND PERSONAL INJURY LITIGATION: WEBINAR 5th OCTOBER 2020

CHILDREN AND PERSONAL INJURY LITIGATION: WEBINAR 5th OCTOBER 2020

September 11, 2020 · by gexall · in Civil Procedure, Clinical Negligence, Damages, Members Content, Personal Injury, Webinar

This webinar looks at practical issues relating to children and personal injury litigation, including liability, damages and procedure. Details of how to book are available here.    This webinar looks at the practical implications of acting for children injured in…

SENSIBLE COVID PRECAUTIONS TAKEN WHEN IMPLEMENTING A SEARCH ORDER: APPLICANT TAKES A VERY NUANCED APPROACH

SENSIBLE COVID PRECAUTIONS TAKEN WHEN IMPLEMENTING A SEARCH ORDER: APPLICANT TAKES A VERY NUANCED APPROACH

September 9, 2020 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil Procedure, Coronavirus, Injunctions, Members Content

The judgment of Mr Justice Fordham in Calor Gas Ltd v Chorley Bottle Gas Ltd & Anor [2020] EWHC 2426 (QB) has some interesting observations about the way in which COVID affects both the way a hearing is held and…

CIVIL PROCEDURE BACK TO BASICS 83: PART 18 REQUESTS FOR FURTHER INFORMATION

CIVIL PROCEDURE BACK TO BASICS 83: PART 18 REQUESTS FOR FURTHER INFORMATION

September 8, 2020 · by gexall · in Case Management, Civil Procedure, Members Content

Part 18 requests are often misused.  The Practice Direction states “A Request should be concise and strictly confined to matters which are reasonably necessary and proportionate to enable the first party to prepare his own case or to understand the…

PROTOCOL FOR INSOLVENCY AND COMPANY WORK AT CENTRAL LONDON COUNTY COURT: APPLICABLE FROM TODAY

PROTOCOL FOR INSOLVENCY AND COMPANY WORK AT CENTRAL LONDON COUNTY COURT: APPLICABLE FROM TODAY

September 7, 2020 · by gexall · in Civil Procedure, Coronavirus, Members Content, Remote hearings

A Protocol for insolvency and company work at Central London applies from today. It is set out in full below. It sets out details for remote hearings of bulk and other work made necessary by the pandemic. “PROTOCOL FOR INSOLVENCY…

PROVING THINGS 182: FAILING TO PROVE A CONTRACT WAS SIGNED AND GETTING DAMAGES OF £1: NOT A GREAT RESULT FOR A CLAIMANT

PROVING THINGS 182: FAILING TO PROVE A CONTRACT WAS SIGNED AND GETTING DAMAGES OF £1: NOT A GREAT RESULT FOR A CLAIMANT

September 4, 2020 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Damages, Members Content

The judgment of JJH Melissa Clarke, sitting as a High Court Judge, in DPA (London) Ltd v D’Aguanno & Ors [2020] EWHC 2374 (IPEC) is a classic example of failing to prove key matters in a claim. Firstly the claimant…

SIMILAR WITNESS STATEMENTS (WITH THE SAME TYPOS) AND WITNESS CONFERRING WITH OTHERS: WHY “I SAY THE SAME AS THEM” RARELY HELPS

September 4, 2020 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Witness statements

 In  the judgment today in Dr Jones Yeovil Ltd v The Stepping Stone Group Ltd [2020] EWHC 2308 (TCC)  HHJ Russen QC (sitting as a High Court judge) made some observations about the witnesses giving evidence.  The fact that some…

LETTER STATING THAT THE DEFENDANT CONSENTED TO SOME AMENDMENTS DID NOT OUST COURT'S JURISDICTION: TRY TO AMEND AT YOUR PERIL

LETTER STATING THAT THE DEFENDANT CONSENTED TO SOME AMENDMENTS DID NOT OUST COURT’S JURISDICTION: TRY TO AMEND AT YOUR PERIL

September 3, 2020 · by gexall · in Amendment, Applications, Case Management, Civil Procedure, Members Content

In  Scott & Ors v Singh [2020] EWHC 1714 (Comm) HHJ Eyre QC rejected an argument that a letter stating that the defendants agreed to some proposed amendments by the claimant meant that the court had no jurisdiction to prevent…

"PREPARED IN A WAY THAT MAKES ME ASHAMED OF MY PROFESSION": ENSURING WITNESS STATEMENTS ARE ACCURATE IS AN IMPORTANT TASK - IF YOU WANT TO KEEP YOUR JOB...

“PREPARED IN A WAY THAT MAKES ME ASHAMED OF MY PROFESSION”: ENSURING WITNESS STATEMENTS ARE ACCURATE IS AN IMPORTANT TASK – IF YOU WANT TO KEEP YOUR JOB…

September 2, 2020 · by gexall · in Avoiding negligence claims, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Conduct, Damages, Members Content, Witness statements

There are nearly 800 posts on this blog that deal with  issues relating to witness statements.  The importance of ensuring that a statement is accurate is seen in the judgment of the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal in SRA -v- Gilfillan, available…

CIVIL PROCEDURE (CORONAVIRUS): BLOG AND ARTICLES ROUND UP - AUGUST 2020

CIVIL PROCEDURE (CORONAVIRUS): BLOG AND ARTICLES ROUND UP – AUGUST 2020

September 1, 2020 · by gexall · in Civil Procedure, Coronavirus, Members Content, Useful links

A round up of blog posts and articles relating to civil procedure and coronavirus for August 2020. Remote Hearings Stewarts – Divisional Court judgment offers lessons for virtual trials   Litigation Litigation Futures – NHS, solicitors and patients group agree Covid-19 claims…

CIVIL PROCEDURE (NOT-CORONAVIRUS): BLOG AND ARTICLES ROUND UP - AUGUST 2020

CIVIL PROCEDURE (NOT-CORONAVIRUS): BLOG AND ARTICLES ROUND UP – AUGUST 2020

September 1, 2020 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Useful links

A round up of blogs and articles about procedure, evidence and damages published in August 2020. Costs DAC Beachcroft – Beware of costs sanctions if your conduct falls out of line Costs Barrister – Crypto tokens and litigation funding ACL – Claimant debarred…

← Previous 1 … 39 40 41 … 70 Next →

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email. Subscription notifies you of a new post, it does not give you access to members' content.

Join 12.3K other subscribers

Recent Posts

  • ARE YOU SURE WHO IS REALLY INSTRUCTING YOU? SOLICITORS DECEIVED BY A FALSE EMAIL ADDRESS IN NAOMI CAMPBELL’S CASE
  • COSTS BITES 461: WINNING THE CASE BUT LOSING THE MAIN BATTLE MEANS CLAIMANT RECOVERS 85% OF COSTS: DEFENDANT CANNOT SEEK THE ADVANTAGES OF PART 36 WITHOUT MAKING A PART 36 OFFER
  • WHAT HAS CIVIL LITIGATION BRIEF DONE ABOUT … APPLYING TO RELY ON EXPERT EVIDENCE (2): A GUIDE FOR RESPONDENTS: 10 KEY POINTS WITH USEFUL LINKS
  • PROVING THINGS 297 : THE COURT OF APPEAL OVERTURNED A FINDING THAT A SOLICITOR WAS DISHONEST: RECKLESSNESS AND CUTTING CORNERS ARE NOT THE SAME AS DISHONESTY
  • WHAT HAS CIVIL LITIGATION BRIEF DONE ABOUT… APPLYING FOR PERMISSION TO RELY ON EXPERT EVIDENCE ? A GUIDE FOR APPLICANTS: 10 KEY POINTS WITH USEFUL LINKS

Top Posts

Archives

Blogroll

  • Fatal Accident Law
  • Legal Futures
  • Personal injury: Liability and Damages

Books

  • Munkman & Exall on Damages for Personal Injuries and Death 15th ed
  • The APIL Guide to Fatal Accidents 4th edition

Useful Links

  • Buntools (for preparing PDF Bundles)
  • Kings Chambers
  • Kings Chambers Costs & Litigation Funding
  • Kings Chambers Serious Injury
  • The Civil Procedure Rules
  • The Law Society Gazette
  • The National Archives Recently Published Judgments
  • The Senior Court Costs Office Guide 2025
  • www.Bailii.org

Copyright

© Gordon Exall, Exall Legal Training, Civil Litigation Brief, 2013-2026. Unauthorised use and or duplication of the material contained on this blog without permission is strictly prohibited.
Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.

To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
  • Membership Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Advertising Policy
  • Copyright
  • Legal Disclaimer

Copyright © 2026 Civil Litigation Brief ®

Powered by Big Yellow Workshop

Loading Comments...

You must be logged in to post a comment.