Civil Litigation Brief ®
Menu
  • Home
  • About
  • Membership Plans
  • Webinars
  • Login
Updates and Commentary on Civil Procedure, by Gordon Exall, Barrister, Kings Chambers
Browse: Home » Civil Procedure » Page 39
CORONAVIRUS LAW: COVID NOT A GOOD REASON TO CHANGE NORMAL RULE AS TO COSTS FOLLOWING DISCONTINUANCE

CORONAVIRUS LAW: COVID NOT A GOOD REASON TO CHANGE NORMAL RULE AS TO COSTS FOLLOWING DISCONTINUANCE

June 5, 2020 · by gexall · in Civil Procedure, Coronavirus, Costs, Members Content

In Khan v Governor of HMP The Mount & Anor [2020] EWHC 1367  Mr Justice Spencer considered, and rejected, an argument that a different costs order should be made because of the impact of coronavirus.   THE CASE The claimant…

MISTAKES IN THE PORTAL: "ROUGH JUSTICE" AND ERRORS IN OFFERS: CLAIMANT'S CLAIM STRUCK OUT AS AN ABUSE OF PROCESS

MISTAKES IN THE PORTAL: “ROUGH JUSTICE” AND ERRORS IN OFFERS: CLAIMANT’S CLAIM STRUCK OUT AS AN ABUSE OF PROCESS

June 2, 2020 · by gexall · in Civil Procedure, Members Content, Part 36, Relief from sanctions

I am grateful to barrister Matthew Turner for bringing my attention to his report of the case of Mahoney v Royal Mail (DDJ Doman, Truro CC, 26/05/20) it is another example of mistakes being made in offers. In this case…

CIVIL PROCEDURE: BLOG AND ARTICLES ROUND UP – MAY 2020

CIVIL PROCEDURE: BLOG AND ARTICLES ROUND UP – MAY 2020

June 2, 2020 · by gexall · in Case Management, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Costs, Members Content, Relief from sanctions

As we adjust to the problems of the pandemic some of the more conventional issues of litigation have been dealt with extensively this month.  Costs ACL Trio of High Court judges issue costs penalties to defendants that refused ADR ACL Claimant not…

CIVIL PROCEDURE (CORONAVIRUS): BLOG AND ARTICLES ROUND UP  - MAY 2020

CIVIL PROCEDURE (CORONAVIRUS): BLOG AND ARTICLES ROUND UP – MAY 2020

June 1, 2020 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil Procedure, Coronavirus, Members Content

Articles and posts of interest to litigators in relation to civil procedure and Coronavirus. THE POSTS Courts Litigation Futures Court issues guidance on e-bundles for short applications Remote Hearings Litigation Futures “Uphill battle” to engage judges in remote JR hearings Litigation Futures ……

CHANGE TO THE SPECIAL ACCOUNT RATE: DOWN TO 0.1%: PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS

CHANGE TO THE SPECIAL ACCOUNT RATE: DOWN TO 0.1%: PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS

June 1, 2020 · by gexall · in Civil Procedure, Clinical Negligence, Damages, Interest, Members Content

This morning the Ministry of Justice announced a reduction of interest rates for the Courts Funds special and basic accounts, effective from today (1st June 2020). THE ANNOUNCEMENT “Due to the impact of Covid-19, the Bank England reduced the base…

LATE WITNESS STATEMENT: RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS NOT GRANTED:  A WARNING AGAINST COMPLACENCY

LATE WITNESS STATEMENT: RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS NOT GRANTED: A WARNING AGAINST COMPLACENCY

May 29, 2020 · by gexall · in Applications, Avoiding negligence claims, Case Management, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Relief from sanctions, Witness statements

Anyone who has had the pleasure of hearing Professor Dominic Regan lecture will know that he gives a constant warning that the Denton principles have not gone away. In relation to the late service of budgets in particular, but in…

ACCEPTING AN OFFER DURING A HEARING: CONTRACTUAL PRINCIPLES, NOT PART 36, APPLY: OFFER DID NOT LAPSE AT THE DOOR OF THE COURT

ACCEPTING AN OFFER DURING A HEARING: CONTRACTUAL PRINCIPLES, NOT PART 36, APPLY: OFFER DID NOT LAPSE AT THE DOOR OF THE COURT

May 27, 2020 · by gexall · in Appeals, Assessment of Costs, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Part 36

Offers of settlement can, and often are, made outside the ambit of Part 36.  In MEF v St George’s Healthcare NHS Trust [2020] EWHC 1300 (QB) Mr Justice Morris considered issues relating to late acceptance of offers.  The case shows…

AUTOMATIC STAY OF POSSESSION HEARINGS APPLIES TO APPEALS: COURT OF APPEAL DECISION THIS MORNING

AUTOMATIC STAY OF POSSESSION HEARINGS APPLIES TO APPEALS: COURT OF APPEAL DECISION THIS MORNING

May 27, 2020 · by gexall · in Appeals, Civil Procedure, Coronavirus, Members Content

In London Borough of Hackney -v- Okoro [2020] EWCA Civ 681 the Court of Appeal found that the automatic stay on possession proceedings also applies to appeals against possession orders.     THE CASE The Court of Appeal were asked…

AFFIDAVITS, COMPULSION,  EXHIBITS AND THE IMPLIED DUTY NOT TO DISCLOSE TO THIRD PARTIES: HIGH COURT DECISION

AFFIDAVITS, COMPULSION, EXHIBITS AND THE IMPLIED DUTY NOT TO DISCLOSE TO THIRD PARTIES: HIGH COURT DECISION

May 26, 2020 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Witness statements

I am grateful to barrister Sarah Walker for sending me a copy of the judgment of Deputy Insolvencies and Companies Court Judge Kyriakides in the Official Receiver -v- Skeene & Bowers [2020] EWHC 1252. It concerned the issue of whether…

COVID REPEATS 32: EXPERTS: SEEING THE WOOD FOR THE TREES: THE EXPERT THAT DIDN'T BOUGH DOWN TO THE RULES...

COVID REPEATS 32: EXPERTS: SEEING THE WOOD FOR THE TREES: THE EXPERT THAT DIDN’T BOUGH DOWN TO THE RULES…

May 25, 2020 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Credibility of experts, Expert evidence, Experts, Members Content

This week, providing there are no major developments that draw us elsewhere, the repeats are going to be about cases relating to experts.  Firstly we go back to 2014 the judgment of Mr Justice Coulson in Stagecoach Great Western Trains -v- Hind…

COVID REPEATS 31: REPLIES AND DEFENCE TO COUNTERCLAIM: A PRIMER

COVID REPEATS 31: REPLIES AND DEFENCE TO COUNTERCLAIM: A PRIMER

May 24, 2020 · by gexall · in Civil Procedure, Members Content, Statements of Case

Surprisingly this post about the basics of replies and counterclaims  was the second most read post on this blog in 2017 (surprising because it was written in July 2016).  It simply sets out the basic rules relating to filing a…

CIVIL UPDATE FOR NORTH AND WEST YORKSHIRE: UPDATED GUIDANCE FROM THE DESIGNATED CIVIL JUDGE

CIVIL UPDATE FOR NORTH AND WEST YORKSHIRE: UPDATED GUIDANCE FROM THE DESIGNATED CIVIL JUDGE

May 22, 2020 · by gexall · in Access to justice, Civil Procedure, Coronavirus, Members Content, Remote hearings

HHJ Gosnell has issued new guidance for civil courts in North and West Yorkshire. It is reproduced in full below.   “Introduction The purpose of this document is to update you on events since my last update on 6th April…

AMENDED LISTING PRIORITIES IN THE COUNTY COURT

AMENDED LISTING PRIORITIES IN THE COUNTY COURT

May 22, 2020 · by gexall · in Civil Procedure, Coronavirus, Members Content

The listing priorities in the county court were amended on 14.05.2020.   “Introduction 1. Listing is a judicial function. 2. All applications/hearings/trials should be considered in advance by a judge in order for the judge to decide whether it should…

CLAIM STRUCK OUT FOR INADEQUATE PLEADING: ENOUGH TO MAKE YOU HIT THE BOTTLE

CLAIM STRUCK OUT FOR INADEQUATE PLEADING: ENOUGH TO MAKE YOU HIT THE BOTTLE

May 20, 2020 · by gexall · in Civil Procedure, Members Content, Statements of Case, Striking out

I don’t normally write about the cases relating to defamation and pleading, this is a very niche area and there is usually little of general interest. However the judgment of Mr Justice Nicol in  BrewDog Plc & Anor v Frank…

COVID REPEATS 25: COSTS WHEN A CLAIMANT RECEIVES NOMINAL DAMAGES: YOU'VE TURNED DOWN £1.5 MILLION, RECEIVED £2  & NOW HAVE TO FACE THE CONSEQUENCES

COVID REPEATS 25: COSTS WHEN A CLAIMANT RECEIVES NOMINAL DAMAGES: YOU’VE TURNED DOWN £1.5 MILLION, RECEIVED £2 & NOW HAVE TO FACE THE CONSEQUENCES

May 18, 2020 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Costs, Members Content, Part 36

Failing to beat a Part 36 offer is always painful. Failing to beat an offer of £1.5 million and receiving £2 is, most probably, even more painful.   Here we look at the second part of the case discussed yesterday.  In Marathon…

COVID REPEATS 24: THE CLAIMANT THAT CLAIMED £15 MILLION, TURNED DOWN £1.5 MILLION AND RECEIVED £2.00 (YES TWO WHOLE POUNDS)

COVID REPEATS 24: THE CLAIMANT THAT CLAIMED £15 MILLION, TURNED DOWN £1.5 MILLION AND RECEIVED £2.00 (YES TWO WHOLE POUNDS)

May 17, 2020 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Damages, Members Content

The “Proving Things” series has been a part of this blog for several years now.  Many of the posts highlight those cases (and there does not seem to be any end to them) where a party simply has no evidence…

COVID REPEATS 23: A CHEERFUL POST FOR THE WEEKEND: THE GOOD STUFF ABOUT BEING A LITIGATOR - FROM NICE LAWYERS

COVID REPEATS 23: A CHEERFUL POST FOR THE WEEKEND: THE GOOD STUFF ABOUT BEING A LITIGATOR – FROM NICE LAWYERS

May 15, 2020 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Well being

I thought it would be a good idea to end the week on a positive note.  Here we are looking at contributions from lawyers on Twitter about the positive side of being a lawyer. THE QUEST I set the challenge…

THE IMPORTANCE OF STATEMENTS OF CASE: THE TRIAL SHOULD NOT BECOME A "FREE FOR ALL": COURT OF APPEAL SENDS OUT A WARNING

THE IMPORTANCE OF STATEMENTS OF CASE: THE TRIAL SHOULD NOT BECOME A “FREE FOR ALL”: COURT OF APPEAL SENDS OUT A WARNING

May 15, 2020 · by gexall · in Civil Procedure, Members Content, Statements of Case

In Dhillon v Barclays Bank Plc & Anor [2020] EWCA Civ 619 the Court of Appeal reiterated the importance of statements of case in relation to civil litigation.  The statements of case should define the issues at trial.   “It…

PRE-ACTION DISCLOSURE: CONDUCT, DISCRETION AND THE "FISHING EXPEDITION" ANALOGY MAY NOT BE A GOOD ONE

PRE-ACTION DISCLOSURE: CONDUCT, DISCRETION AND THE “FISHING EXPEDITION” ANALOGY MAY NOT BE A GOOD ONE

May 14, 2020 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil Procedure, Disclosure, Members Content

It is relatively rare for  there to be a High Court judgment on the issue of pre-action disclosure.   In Taylor Wimpey UK Ltd v Harron Homes Ltd [2020] EWHC 1190 (TCC) Mr Justice Fraser had some interesting observations on the…

COVID REPEATS 21: OPENING LINES OF JUDGMENTS (WITH SOME NEW ONES THROWN IN): BJORN AGAIN

COVID REPEATS 21: OPENING LINES OF JUDGMENTS (WITH SOME NEW ONES THROWN IN): BJORN AGAIN

May 14, 2020 · by gexall · in Civil Procedure, Coronavirus, Members Content

Today we are looking at opening lines of judgment.  We also have a new opening line from earlier this year.   ABBA: (ALTHOUGH THE WINNER DIDN’T TAKE IT ALL…) In April this year in a judgment about an inheritance dispute…

AN ELECTRONIC BUNDLE SHOULD BE CONFINED TO "ESSENTIAL" DOCUMENTS: IT HELPS IF COUNSEL HAS A SAY IN ITS PREPARATION: IMPORTANCE GUIDANCE FROM THE HIGH COURT

AN ELECTRONIC BUNDLE SHOULD BE CONFINED TO “ESSENTIAL” DOCUMENTS: IT HELPS IF COUNSEL HAS A SAY IN ITS PREPARATION: IMPORTANCE GUIDANCE FROM THE HIGH COURT

May 11, 2020 · by gexall · in Bundles, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Remote hearings

In the judgment given this morning in  Tailby , Re TPS Investments (UK) Ltd [2020] EWHC 1135 (Ch) HHJ Cox QC (sitting as a High Court Judge) gave some importance guidance in relation to the preparation and presentation of an…

THE EXPERT'S DUTY TO GIVE A RANGE OF OPINION: A DECISION NOT TO DO SO "BORDERING ON ARROGANCE"

THE EXPERT’S DUTY TO GIVE A RANGE OF OPINION: A DECISION NOT TO DO SO “BORDERING ON ARROGANCE”

May 11, 2020 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Credibility of experts, Expert evidence, Experts, Members Content, Personal Injury

Experts have a mandatory duty under the rules to give a range of opinion for their advices.  I am grateful to Gary Smith from Prince Evans & Co for sending me a copy of the judgment of HHJ Belcher in…

LAW CENTRES AND LEGAL NEED DURING LOCKDOWN: GUEST POST FROM SUE JAMES

LAW CENTRES AND LEGAL NEED DURING LOCKDOWN: GUEST POST FROM SUE JAMES

May 7, 2020 · by gexall · in Access to justice, Civil Procedure, Coronavirus, Members Content

Sue James was an early member of the (not so) Lonely Litigator’s Club.  Following comments made about law centres yesterday I  invited Sue to write a guest post on the role of  law centres, generally and during the pandemic.  Sue…

CORONAVIRUS CATCH UP 1: DENTON AND RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS

CORONAVIRUS CATCH UP 1: DENTON AND RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS

May 6, 2020 · by gexall · in Civil Procedure, Members Content, Relief from sanctions

I have, recently, been writing primarily about the impact of coronavirus on lawyers and civil procedure.  Some cases in “mainstream” civil litigation have been overlooked.  To prevent a “backlog” of cases here is a link to, and brief summary of,…

CIVIL PROCEDURE (NOT-CORONAVIRUS): BLOG AND ARTICLES ROUND UP - APRIL 2020

CIVIL PROCEDURE (NOT-CORONAVIRUS): BLOG AND ARTICLES ROUND UP – APRIL 2020

May 2, 2020 · by gexall · in Civil Procedure, Members Content, Useful links

There is still plenty of non-covid work going on as evidenced by these links to posts and articles in April.   Costs Costs Barrister Non party costs orders considered Costs Barrister Principle and non party costs orders Costs Barrister Non party costs orders…

CIVIL PROCEDURE (CORONAVIRUS): BLOG AND ARTICLES ROUND UP - APRIL 2020

CIVIL PROCEDURE (CORONAVIRUS): BLOG AND ARTICLES ROUND UP – APRIL 2020

May 1, 2020 · by gexall · in Civil Procedure, Coronavirus, Members Content, Remote hearings, Useful links

We may not have been getting out much this month but there has been plenty of material on civil procedure, the courts and coronavirus. Courts Herbert Smith Freehills Courts relax rules on agreeing extensions to procedural deadlines in light of COVID-19…

A DRAFT JUDGMENT IS NOT AN INVITATION TO TREAT: PARTIES SHOULD NOT ATTEMPT TO REOPEN THEIR CASE

A DRAFT JUDGMENT IS NOT AN INVITATION TO TREAT: PARTIES SHOULD NOT ATTEMPT TO REOPEN THEIR CASE

April 30, 2020 · by gexall · in Civil Procedure, Conduct, Members Content

In Michael Wilson & Partners Ltd v Sinclair & Anor (No. 2) [2020] EWHC 1017 (QB) Mr Justice Chamberlain added a postscript to the judgment about attempt to “re-open” draft judgments. “Professional lawyers ought to know that the circulation of…

LITIGATION, CASHFLOW AND COVID 2: INTERIM PAYMENTS ON ACCOUNT OF COSTS

LITIGATION, CASHFLOW AND COVID 2: INTERIM PAYMENTS ON ACCOUNT OF COSTS

April 30, 2020 · by gexall · in Civil Procedure, Costs, Interim Payments, Members Content

It is often said that cashflow is the lifeblood of business and this is never more so than in the current situation.  Here we are looking at orders for interim payments when a case, or an issue in a case,…

COVID REPEATS 8: "NEVER WRITE ANYTHING DOWN THAT YOU WOULDN’T WANT READ OUT IN OPEN COURT"

COVID REPEATS 8: “NEVER WRITE ANYTHING DOWN THAT YOU WOULDN’T WANT READ OUT IN OPEN COURT”

April 29, 2020 · by gexall · in Avoiding negligence claims, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Coronavirus, Disclosure, Members Content

I am repeating this because it is important. One rule that every lawyer should learn is that if you write, type, email or text anything you live with the risk that it could end up being read out in court….

THE SOLICITOR'S DUTY TO REVIEW THE DOCUMENTS IN LITIGATION: AN INTERESTING POSTSCRIPT

THE SOLICITOR’S DUTY TO REVIEW THE DOCUMENTS IN LITIGATION: AN INTERESTING POSTSCRIPT

April 28, 2020 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Disclosure, Members Content

There is an interesting postcript to the judgment of  Jon Turner Q.C. (sitting as a Deputy High Court Judge) in Square Global Ltd v Leonard [2020] EWHC 1008 (QB. “It is fundamental that the client must not make the selection…

PERSONAL INJURY LITIGATORS AND THE CORONAVIRUS (LIVE WEBINAR): 13th MAY 2020

PERSONAL INJURY LITIGATORS AND THE CORONAVIRUS (LIVE WEBINAR): 13th MAY 2020

April 27, 2020 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Coronavirus, Members Content, Remote hearings

On the 13th May I am giving a webinar looking at the practical implications for personal injury litigators of coronavirus and social isolation.  This looks at the rule changes, relevant legislation, case law and guidance in relation to coronavirus. It…

THE (NOT SO) LONELY LITIGATOR’S CLUB 14 : ANONYMOUS DISTRICT JUDGE (2): EXERCISING A “RIGHT OF REPLY”

April 27, 2020 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil Procedure, Coronavirus, Members Content, Well being

Our 14th club member is also anonymous.  A second District Judge provides some insight into the difficulties of continuing to work throughout the problems caused by COVID-19. Where are you working from now?   Home. A market town 60 miles…

The Virtual Workspace: 50 Tips for Effective Video Conferencing: BOOK REVIEW - "BUY" IT QUICKLY...

The Virtual Workspace: 50 Tips for Effective Video Conferencing: BOOK REVIEW – “BUY” IT QUICKLY…

April 27, 2020 · by gexall · in Charity, Civil Procedure, Coronavirus, Members Content, Remote hearings

Andrew King’s book is a testament to the speed at which it is possible for lawyers to act. Just over a fortnight ago Andrew wrote a thread on Twitter setting out his experience of being involved in a virtual trial,…

THE (NOT SO) LONELY LITIGATOR'S CLUB 12: ANONYMOUS DISTRICT JUDGE (1)

THE (NOT SO) LONELY LITIGATOR’S CLUB 12: ANONYMOUS DISTRICT JUDGE (1)

April 26, 2020 · by gexall · in Access to justice, Case Management, Civil Procedure, Coronavirus, Members Content, Well being

I haven’t quite worked out the logistics of our club having anonymous members (I will have to check the constitution carefully).  However there are advantages to anonymity, a District Judge (in fact more than one) have agreed to join and…

COVID REPEATS 5: WHAT THEY DON'T TEACH YOU AT LAW SCHOOL 3: SURVIVE AND THRIVE

COVID REPEATS 5: WHAT THEY DON’T TEACH YOU AT LAW SCHOOL 3: SURVIVE AND THRIVE

April 26, 2020 · by gexall · in Avoiding negligence claims, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Well being

Here I am repeating really good, well thought out guidance from the Young Lawyers Group of the Law Society of South Wales.  Quite honestly this is the type of guidance that every lawyer starting their career should be given.  There…

A LIST OF PRACTICAL GUIDANCE CONCERNING THE OPERATIONS OF COURTS AND TRIBUNALS

A LIST OF PRACTICAL GUIDANCE CONCERNING THE OPERATIONS OF COURTS AND TRIBUNALS

April 24, 2020 · by gexall · in Civil Procedure, Coronavirus, Members Content

There has been a whole host of information relating to the practical operation of courts and tribunals.  I am grateful to the barristers at 4-5 Gray’s Inn Square for sending me details of their collection and collation of this material….

APPEAL JUDGE OVERTURNS REFUSAL TO EXERCISE SECTION 33 DISCRETION: DELAY AND PREJUDICE HIGHLY RELEVANT FACTORS

APPEAL JUDGE OVERTURNS REFUSAL TO EXERCISE SECTION 33 DISCRETION: DELAY AND PREJUDICE HIGHLY RELEVANT FACTORS

April 24, 2020 · by gexall · in Civil Procedure, Limitation, Members Content

In Gregory v H J Haynes Ltd [2020] EWHC 911 (Ch) Mr Justice Mann overturned a judge’s decision not to exercise their discretion under Section 33 of the Limitation Act 1980.  The claimant had been guilty of culpable delay but…

COVID REPEATS 3: WHAT THEY DON’T TEACH YOU AT LAW SCHOOL (1)

April 23, 2020 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Useful links

In 2017 there was a whole series of posts with advice given from Twitter for those starting their careers in the courts.  Since many people aren’t getting that experience right now (or getting it in a fairly remote form), this…

COVID REPEATS 2:  DEADLINES AND PROCRASTINATION: HOW DO YOU DEAL WITH IT?

COVID REPEATS 2: DEADLINES AND PROCRASTINATION: HOW DO YOU DEAL WITH IT?

April 22, 2020 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Well being

Working in unusual conditions, often away from the office, and in the midst of a pandemic can sharpen the mind. For many of us, however,  it makes work more difficult.  It is worthwhile repeating a post from last year with…

QUEEN'S BENCH GUIDANCE BULLETINS: SUMMARIES AND LINKS

QUEEN’S BENCH GUIDANCE BULLETINS: SUMMARIES AND LINKS

April 22, 2020 · by gexall · in Case Management, Civil Procedure, Coronavirus, Members Content, Useful links

Inevitably guidance from the QBD  on the impact of coronavirus has come in stages.  The six  Bulletins are summarised below, together with links to the each guidance. Queen’s Bench guidance: This update explains the steps that are being taken in order…

SERVICE ON EU-DOMICILED DEFENDANTS: DIFFICULTIES THAT ARISE WITH THE CLOSURE OF THE FOREIGN PROCESS SECTION

SERVICE ON EU-DOMICILED DEFENDANTS: DIFFICULTIES THAT ARISE WITH THE CLOSURE OF THE FOREIGN PROCESS SECTION

April 21, 2020 · by gexall · in Civil Procedure, Coronavirus, Members Content, Service of the claim form, Serving documents

I am grateful to barrister James Beeton for drawing my attention to, and giving me permission to cite from, his post on the International Law and Travel Blog “A BIG PROBLEM FOR SERVICE ON EU-DOMICILED DEFENDANTS” THE CLOSURE OF THE FOREIGN…

EXTENSION OF TIME GRANTED AND HEARING PUT BACK BECAUSE OF COVID-19 PROBLEMS: THE RELEVANT PRINCIPLES CONSIDERED

EXTENSION OF TIME GRANTED AND HEARING PUT BACK BECAUSE OF COVID-19 PROBLEMS: THE RELEVANT PRINCIPLES CONSIDERED

April 21, 2020 · by gexall · in Case Management, Civil Procedure, Coronavirus, Extensions of time, Members Content

In Muncipio De Mariana & Ors v BHP Group Plc [2020] EWHC 928 (TCC) HHJ Eyre QC allowed the defendants extra time to serve evidence because of the coronavirus crisis and a hearing date was put back.  There is an…

Covid-19 and the immigration tribunals: a working guide for representatives

April 20, 2020 · by gexall · in Civil Procedure, Coronavirus, Members Content, Useful links

Barristers Bernadette Smith and Geeta Koska have produced a guide dealing with the legal and practical issues facing those who are practising in immigration tribunals during the coronavirus crisis. THE GUIDE One useful function of the guide is that it…

ANOTHER DAY ANOTHER AMENDMENT TO THE PRACTICE DIRECTIONS: POSSESSION PROCEEDINGS

ANOTHER DAY ANOTHER AMENDMENT TO THE PRACTICE DIRECTIONS: POSSESSION PROCEEDINGS

April 20, 2020 · by gexall · in Civil Procedure, Coronavirus, Members Content

There have been amendments to Practice Direction 51Z.  These provide exceptions to the total ban on possession proceedings.   THE AMENDMENTS: 120th UPDATE – PRACTICE DIRECTION AMENDMENTS “The amendments to Practice Direction 51Z supplementing the Civil Procedure Rules 1998 are…

119th Practice Direction Update to the Civil Procedure Rules – Online Civil Money Claims in support of the Covid-19 effort

119th Practice Direction Update to the Civil Procedure Rules – Online Civil Money Claims in support of the Covid-19 effort

April 20, 2020 · by gexall · in Case Management, Civil Procedure, Coronavirus, Members Content

The 119th update to the Practice Direction Amendments can be found here.  The amendments relate to the the Online Civil Claims (OCMC) pilot scheme. THE CHANGES The changes are best summarised in the Courts and Tribunals Announcements page, available here. …

THE POSTS ON CORONAVIRUS: CATALOGUED AND SORTED (IT HAS BEEN QUITE A MONTH…)

April 19, 2020 · by gexall · in Civil Procedure, Coronavirus, Members Content, Useful links

I first wrote about Coronavirus in a post on March 15.  This feels like a very long time ago. This blog has, basically, been looking at the issues relating to coronavirus, lawyers and litigation ever since then.  This seems like…

COVID REPEATS (1): THE (ALMOST) COMPLETE GUIDE FOR ASPIRANT AND NEW LAWYERS - FROM TWITTER

COVID REPEATS (1): THE (ALMOST) COMPLETE GUIDE FOR ASPIRANT AND NEW LAWYERS – FROM TWITTER

April 17, 2020 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content, What I'd tell a younger me

I have spent some time (probably too much time) watching repeats of cricket matches over the past few weeks. On the whole these remain almost as interesting (or boring, depending on your point of view) as the first time around. …

THE INNS OF COURT COLLEGE OF ADVOCACY: PRINCIPLES FOR REMOTE ADVOCACY

THE INNS OF COURT COLLEGE OF ADVOCACY: PRINCIPLES FOR REMOTE ADVOCACY

April 16, 2020 · by gexall · in Case Management, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Remote hearings, Useful links, Written advocacy

In an extremely short amount of time the Inns of Court College of Advocacy has produced a remarkable guide “Principles for Remote Advocacy”. The document has entered the public domain today, with no restrictions on its use, it is available…

MESSAGE FOR CIRCUIT AND DISTRICT JUDGES FROM THE LORD CHIEF JUSTICE, MASTER OF THE ROLLS AND PRESIDENT OF THE FAMILY DIVISION

MESSAGE FOR CIRCUIT AND DISTRICT JUDGES FROM THE LORD CHIEF JUSTICE, MASTER OF THE ROLLS AND PRESIDENT OF THE FAMILY DIVISION

April 15, 2020 · by gexall · in Civil Procedure, Coronavirus, Members Content, Remote hearings

The Lord Chief Justice, Master of the Rolls and President of the Family Division have sent out a message to civil and family judges.  This has been made generally available.  I provide here highlights of the message, particularly relating to…

COVID-19 and Remote Court Arrangements: 30 tips for dealing with Virtual Hearings: GUEST POST FROM ANDREW KING

COVID-19 and Remote Court Arrangements: 30 tips for dealing with Virtual Hearings: GUEST POST FROM ANDREW KING

April 15, 2020 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil Procedure, Coronavirus, Members Content, Remote hearings

I am grateful to Andrew King from Lennons solicitors for allowing me to reproduce his article on dealing with virtual hearings. This was based on Andrew’s experience of being involved in a three day remote trial.  As you can see…

← Previous 1 … 38 39 40 … 67 Next →

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email. Subscription notifies you of a new post, it does not give you access to members' content.

Join 12.4K other subscribers

Recent Posts

  • COST BITES 429: A REMINDER THAT A CLAIMANT IS STILL LIABLE TO PAY COSTS EVEN IF PROCEEDINGS ARE NEVER SERVED: SOMETHING ABOUT PRE-ACTION CONDUCT TOO…
  • SETTING ASIDE A JUDGMENT OBTAINED BY FRAUD: WHAT IF ONE OF THE PARTIES WAS INNOCENT? COURT OF APPEAL CONSIDERS THE ISSUE: SOMETHING ABOUT LACHES TOO…
  • ENFORCEMENT BULLETIN 5: AN APPLICATION FOR RECOVERY OF MONEY PAID TO ENFORCEMENT AGENT DISMISSED: IT WAS TOO LATE AND MISCONCEIVED IN ANY EVENT
  • A MYRIAD OF PROCEDURAL ISSUES A BANKRUPT CLAIMANT; AN APPLICATION TO RESILE FROM AN ADMISSION AND AN ATTEMPT TO STRIKE OUT A COUNTERCLAIM FOR “WAREHOUSING”
  • THROWBACK FRIDAY: THE DUTY TO PUT YOUR CASE: FINDINGS MADE ON KEY POINTS THAT WERE NOT PUT TO THE WITNESS OVERTURNED ON APPEAL (AUGUST 2017)

Top Posts

COST BITES 426: COURT OF APPEAL OVERTURNS DECISION THAT A CLAIMANT IN THE SMALL CLAIMS TRACK SHOULD PAY COSTS AFTER DISCONTINUING: "THE SMALL CLAIMS TRACK IS DESIGNED TO BE DIFFERENT"
THIS CASE SHOULD BE HEARD IN MANCHESTER: ANOTHER ADMINISTRATIVE COURT CASE TRANSFERRED AWAY FROM LONDON
THROWBACK FRIDAY: THE DUTY TO PUT YOUR CASE: FINDINGS MADE ON KEY POINTS THAT WERE NOT PUT TO THE WITNESS OVERTURNED ON APPEAL (AUGUST 2017)
BACK TO BASICS MONDAY: WHAT DOCUMENTS NEED TO BE IN AN APPEAL BUNDLE? A JUDGMENT ON THAT VERY POINT:"DOCUMENTS GENUINELY REQUIRED FOR DETERMINATION OF THE APPEAL"
A PARTY CANNOT ADVANCE ONE CASE IN ONE SET OF PROCEEDINGS AND THE OPPOSITE CASE IN ANOTHER: ESTOPPEL BY CONDUCT LEADS TO A COUNTERCLAIM BEING STRUCK OUT: COURT OF APPEAL DECISION

Archives

Blogroll

  • Fatal Accident Law
  • Legal Futures
  • Personal injury: Liability and Damages

Books

  • Munkman & Exall on Damages for Personal Injuries and Death 15th ed
  • The APIL Guide to Fatal Accidents 4th edition

Useful Links

  • Buntools (for preparing PDF Bundles)
  • Kings Chambers
  • Kings Chambers Costs & Litigation Funding
  • Kings Chambers Serious Injury
  • The Civil Procedure Rules
  • The Law Society Gazette
  • The National Archives Recently Published Judgments
  • The Senior Court Costs Office Guide 2025
  • www.Bailii.org

Copyright

© Gordon Exall, Exall Legal Training, Civil Litigation Brief, 2013-2026. Unauthorised use and or duplication of the material contained on this blog without permission is strictly prohibited.
Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.

To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
  • Membership Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Advertising Policy
  • Copyright
  • Legal Disclaimer

Copyright © 2026 Civil Litigation Brief ®

Powered by Big Yellow Workshop

Loading Comments...

You must be logged in to post a comment.