Civil Litigation Brief ®
Menu
  • Home
  • About
  • Membership Plans
  • Webinars
  • Login
Updates and Commentary on Civil Procedure, by Gordon Exall, Barrister, Kings Chambers
Browse: Home » Civil Procedure » Page 38
GUIDANCE IN CIVIL CASES FROM THE DCJ FOR NORTHUMBRIA AND DURHAM

GUIDANCE IN CIVIL CASES FROM THE DCJ FOR NORTHUMBRIA AND DURHAM

March 26, 2020 · by gexall · in Case Management, Civil Procedure, Coronavirus, Members Content

HHJ Jeremy Freedman, DCJ for Northumbria and Durham, has given the following guidance for courts within that area. Note: (1) The extension of time for the parties to agree variation of the timetable to 90 days; (2) Electronic signatures will…

MODEL LETTERS FOR LAWYERS IN THE CORONAVIRUS CRISIS

March 25, 2020 · by gexall · in Civil Procedure, Coronavirus, Members Content

I am grateful to John McQuater, solicitor, for sending me copies of model letters for use in the current crisis.  The first is for the client, the other to the other side in litigation. Emergency 1 – Letter to client…

REMOTE WORKING AND THE LITIGATOR 4: YOU CAN AGREE TO EXTEND TIME FOR SERVICE OF THE CLAIM FORM: BUT YOU HAVE TO BE CAREFUL

REMOTE WORKING AND THE LITIGATOR 4: YOU CAN AGREE TO EXTEND TIME FOR SERVICE OF THE CLAIM FORM: BUT YOU HAVE TO BE CAREFUL

March 25, 2020 · by gexall · in Civil Procedure, Coronavirus, Extensions of time, Members Content, Service of the claim form

One question asked after I gave a webinar this morning was whether it is possible for the parties to agree an extension of time for service of the claim form.  The brief answer is – yes it is. Care has…

NEW PRACTICE DIRECTION COMES INTO FORCE TODAY: VIDEO OR AUDIO HEARINGS DURING CORONAVIRUS PANDEMIC

NEW PRACTICE DIRECTION COMES INTO FORCE TODAY: VIDEO OR AUDIO HEARINGS DURING CORONAVIRUS PANDEMIC

March 25, 2020 · by gexall · in Civil Procedure, Coronavirus, Members Content

A new Practice Direction comes into force today governing remote hearings. 116th UPDATE – PRACTICE DIRECTION AMENDMENTS PRACTICE DIRECTION 51Y – VIDEO OR AUDIO HEARINGS DURING CORONAVIRUS PANDEMIC This Practice Direction supplements Part 51 1. This practice direction, made under…

REMOTE WORKING AND THE LITIGATOR 3: SIGNING WITNESS STATEMENTS IN A TIME OF SOCIAL ISOLATION

REMOTE WORKING AND THE LITIGATOR 3: SIGNING WITNESS STATEMENTS IN A TIME OF SOCIAL ISOLATION

March 25, 2020 · by gexall · in Civil Procedure, Coronavirus, Members Content, Statements of Truth, Witness statements

One major difficulty that faces all litigators at present is how to get witness statements signed.    Here are a few ideas.   E-SIGNATURES MAY BE VALID There is no binding authority on this issue. However the decision of District Judge…

AN OPEN LETTER TO THE CIVIL PROCEDURE RULE COMMITTEE: DO SOMETHING AND DO IT NOW – FOR THE SAKE OF THE COUNTRY

March 24, 2020 · by gexall · in Access to justice, Civil Procedure, Coronavirus, Members Content

Earlier today I tweeted “Anyone want to join me in an “open letter” to the Civil Procedure Rule Committee (& anyone else who will listen). We need guidance NOW to allow the parties to agree open-ended extensions of time. This…

MODEL: AGREED PROCEDURAL TEMPLATE FOR JOINT SETTLEMENT MEETINGS HELD REMOTELY

MODEL: AGREED PROCEDURAL TEMPLATE FOR JOINT SETTLEMENT MEETINGS HELD REMOTELY

March 24, 2020 · by gexall · in Civil Procedure, Coronavirus, Members Content, Remote hearings

39 Essex Chambers have sent me a model Agreed Procedural Template for Joint Settlement Meetings held remotely and kindly said I can share it.  This is available on their website – here.    “The parties to a remote JSM agree…

LISTING PROTOCOL FOR CIVIL COURTS: NORTH AND WEST YORKSHIRE AND LEEDS DISTRICT REGISTRY

LISTING PROTOCOL FOR CIVIL COURTS: NORTH AND WEST YORKSHIRE AND LEEDS DISTRICT REGISTRY

March 23, 2020 · by gexall · in Civil Procedure, Coronavirus, Members Content

HHJ Gosnell has issued a Listing Protocol covering procedure in the county court North and West Yorkshire or in the District Registry of the Queen’s Bench Division in Leeds”  Note, in particular, the adjournment of all ongoing possession proceedings.  …

REVIEW OF COURT ARRANGEMENTS: MESSAGE FROM THE LORD CHIEF JUSTICE

March 23, 2020 · by gexall · in Civil Procedure, Coronavirus, Members Content

As I am reading reports of numerous courts being open and requiring personal attendance today (23rd March) the Lord Chief Justice has issued a further note.  Jury trials are “paused”.   It has finally dawned on someone that the practice of…

PROTOCOL REGARDING REMOTE HEARINGS: OFFICIAL GUIDANCE

March 22, 2020 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Coronavirus, Members Content

This Protocol was issued on the 20th March.  Civil-court-guidance-on-how-to-conduct-remote-hearings CIVIL JUSTICE IN ENGLAND and WALES PROTOCOL REGARDING REMOTE HEARINGS 20 March 2020: for publication Introduction to this Protocol 1. The current pandemic necessitates the use of remote hearings where… Enjoying…

SPECIFIC GUIDANCE FOR FAMILY COURTS IN DORSET

SPECIFIC GUIDANCE FOR FAMILY COURTS IN DORSET

March 21, 2020 · by gexall · in Case Management, Civil Procedure, Coronavirus, Members Content

HHJ Dancey, the Designated Family Judge for Dorset, has sent out a Local Practice Guidance on COVID-19. I am grateful to barrister Amanda Bancroft for sending it to me. It provides a template for working and supplements the President’s national…

REMOTE WORKING AND LITIGATOR 2: THE STATEMENT OF TRUTH

REMOTE WORKING AND LITIGATOR 2: THE STATEMENT OF TRUTH

March 21, 2020 · by gexall · in Avoiding negligence claims, Civil Procedure, Coronavirus, Members Content, Statements of Truth

There are likely to be very few, if any, “face to face” meetings with clients in the near future. How do we cope with the statement of truth (I will deal with the specific issue of witness statements and the…

CIVIL COURT USERS IN MANCHESTER: GUIDANCE FROM THE DESIGNATED CIVIL JUDGE

CIVIL COURT USERS IN MANCHESTER: GUIDANCE FROM THE DESIGNATED CIVIL JUDGE

March 20, 2020 · by gexall · in Case Management, Civil Procedure, Coronavirus, Members Content

HHJ Bird has issued specific guidance for civil court users in Manchester. “Dear Court User, I am writing to let you know what steps we are taking to keep the civil courts running in these difficult times. Specific arrangements apply…

REMOTE WORKING AND THE LITIGATOR 1: THE NEW REQUIREMENT FOR WITNESS STATEMENTS

REMOTE WORKING AND THE LITIGATOR 1: THE NEW REQUIREMENT FOR WITNESS STATEMENTS

March 20, 2020 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Coronavirus, Members Content, Witness statements

Given that many of us will be working from home and not having direct contact with colleagues or clients I am starting a series on the issues we litigators currently face. The first looks at the issues caused by the…

UPDATE ON COVID-19 AND THE COURTS: GUIDANCE FROM THE LORD CHIEF JUSTICE

UPDATE ON COVID-19 AND THE COURTS: GUIDANCE FROM THE LORD CHIEF JUSTICE

March 19, 2020 · by gexall · in Civil Procedure, Coronavirus, Members Content

The Lord Chief Justice has today issued guidance today which makes it clear that remote hearings are now the default position. “The default position now in all jurisdictions must be that hearings should be conducted with one, more than one…

HMCTS GUIDANCE: CLOSURE OF COUNTERS IN THE QBD AND COURT OF APPEAL

HMCTS GUIDANCE: CLOSURE OF COUNTERS IN THE QBD AND COURT OF APPEAL

March 18, 2020 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil Procedure, Members Content

In press Notices sent out at 21.55 this evening HMCTS announced the closure of counters at the QBD and  Court of Appeal.  These are both set out in full below.   QBD “The Queen’s Bench Division is making some temporary…

HMCTS GUIDANCE ON TELEPHONE AND VIDEO HEARINGS DURING CORONAVIRUS OUTBREAK

HMCTS GUIDANCE ON TELEPHONE AND VIDEO HEARINGS DURING CORONAVIRUS OUTBREAK

March 18, 2020 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil Procedure, Members Content

HMCTS has published guidance HMCTS telephone and video hearings during coronavirus outbreak   THE GUIDANCE “Running our courts and tribunals is an essential public service. Audio and video technology has long played a part in the justice system and can now…

CIVIL PROCEDURE AND THE CORONAVIRUS: PRACTICAL SOLUTIONS IN AN UNCERTAIN TIME: WEBINAR 25th MARCH 2020

CIVIL PROCEDURE AND THE CORONAVIRUS: PRACTICAL SOLUTIONS IN AN UNCERTAIN TIME: WEBINAR 25th MARCH 2020

March 18, 2020 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil Procedure, Members Content

On the 25th March 2020 at 1.00 pm I am giving a webinar on civil procedure and coronavirus, dealing with the best means of coping with procedural and other issues arising from COVID-19.  This is aimed primarily at personal injury…

CORONAVIRUS UPDATE FROM THE LORD CHIEF JUSTICE: THE WHEELS OF JUSTICE SHOULD NOT GRIND TO A HALT

CORONAVIRUS UPDATE FROM THE LORD CHIEF JUSTICE: THE WHEELS OF JUSTICE SHOULD NOT GRIND TO A HALT

March 18, 2020 · by gexall · in Civil Procedure, Members Content

The update, issued yesterday is available here.  KEY POINTS “It is not realistic to suppose that it will be business as usual in any jurisdiction, but it is of vital importance that the administration of justice does not grind to…

WORKING REMOTELY: USEFUL GUIDANCE

WORKING REMOTELY: USEFUL GUIDANCE

March 17, 2020 · by gexall · in Avoiding negligence claims, Case Management, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Useful links

I have, ironically, been planning to write on remote working for some time.  The post was going to be in the “well being” series and, among other things, deal with issues like social isolation when working from home.  Now, of…

CORONAVIRUS: MORE USEFUL LINKS FOR LAWYERS

CORONAVIRUS: MORE USEFUL LINKS FOR LAWYERS

March 17, 2020 · by gexall · in Civil Procedure, Members Content

A large part of me wants to get back to writing about service of the claim form, committal proceedings and the like (and to that extent normal proceedings will be resumed shortly).  Here a few additional links and updates. HEALTH…

CORONAVIRUS - A USEFUL CASE: MASTER ALLOWS PARTY TO VARY DIRECTIONS BY CONSENT BY 56 DAYS

CORONAVIRUS – A USEFUL CASE: MASTER ALLOWS PARTY TO VARY DIRECTIONS BY CONSENT BY 56 DAYS

March 16, 2020 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil Procedure, Extensions of time, Members Content

7BR’s website carries an interesting report  from Adam Korn of a judgment today where Master Davison made an order extending the amount of time the parties can agree to vary directions.  This was directly because of potential difficulties arising out…

GIVING THE SOURCE OF INFORMATION AND BELIEF IN A WITNESS STATEMENT: NOT A MERE TECHNICALITY: FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH RULES CAN HAVE MAJOR CONSEQUENCES

GIVING THE SOURCE OF INFORMATION AND BELIEF IN A WITNESS STATEMENT: NOT A MERE TECHNICALITY: FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH RULES CAN HAVE MAJOR CONSEQUENCES

March 15, 2020 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Witness statements

This blog has dealt, many times, with the difficulties  that  can arise when a solicitor makes a witness statement in support of an interlocutory application.  Not least there is a duty to give details of the source of information and…

CIVIL LITIGATION IN A TIME OF TOTAL UNCERTAINTY: 10 KEY POINTS ON DIFFICULTIES ARISING OUT OF THE CORONAVIRUS OUTBREAK

CIVIL LITIGATION IN A TIME OF TOTAL UNCERTAINTY: 10 KEY POINTS ON DIFFICULTIES ARISING OUT OF THE CORONAVIRUS OUTBREAK

March 15, 2020 · by gexall · in Civil Procedure, Extensions of time, Members Content, Relief from sanctions

I cannot recall a time when matters were so rife with uncertainty.  By request I have been asked to consider practical steps litigators can take.  Equally significantly we have to consider what steps the courts, and the Rules Committee, should…

"STATEMENTS OF CASE PLAY A CRITICAL ROLE IN CIVIL LITIGATION WHICH SHOULD NOT BE DIMINISHED": THE COURT OF APPEAL AND THE LEARNING ACADEMY

“STATEMENTS OF CASE PLAY A CRITICAL ROLE IN CIVIL LITIGATION WHICH SHOULD NOT BE DIMINISHED”: THE COURT OF APPEAL AND THE LEARNING ACADEMY

March 12, 2020 · by gexall · in Appeals, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Statements of Case

In November 2018 I wrote about the decision of HHJ Klein in  UK Learning Academy Ltd v The Secretary of State for Education [2018] EWHC 2915 (Comm). An appeal from that judgment has been heard, and dismissed, by the Court of Appeal. …

DEFENDANT'S PART 20 CLAIM AGAINST CLAIMANT'S WITNESSES STRUCK OUT: WITNESSES HAVE IMMUNITY (AND THIS HAS CONSEQUENCES...)

DEFENDANT’S PART 20 CLAIM AGAINST CLAIMANT’S WITNESSES STRUCK OUT: WITNESSES HAVE IMMUNITY (AND THIS HAS CONSEQUENCES…)

March 12, 2020 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Striking out, Witness statements

I am grateful to barrister David Green for supplying me with a note* of the judgment of HHJ Saggerson in Holley -v- Woodburn.  HHJ Saggerson, Central London County Court). A copy of the judgment is available  here C65YX969 Holley v…

ATTEMPTING TO APPEAL A FINDING OF FACT? SET THIS OUT EXPLICITLY IN THE NOTICE OF APPEAL: CLEAR GUIDANCE FROM THE COURT OF APPEAL

March 11, 2020 · by gexall · in Appeals, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content

In Taylor v Rhino Overseas Inc. [2020] EWCA Civ 353 the Court of Appeal set out guidance for a party attempting to appeal a finding of fact.  The fact that such an appeal is being made must be set out…

THAT IMPORTANT DISTINCTION BETWEEN A "NON-ADMISSION" AND A DENIAL IN A DEFENCE:  THE KEY CASES CONSIDERED

THAT IMPORTANT DISTINCTION BETWEEN A “NON-ADMISSION” AND A DENIAL IN A DEFENCE: THE KEY CASES CONSIDERED

March 10, 2020 · by gexall · in Appeals, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Statements of Case

The discussion yesterday of the decision in Aven & Ors v Orbis Business Intelligence Ltd [2020] EWHC 523 (QB) gives rise to review  cases on pleading a defence, in particular the  important distinction between a “denial” and a “non-admission”. It is…

SERVING PROCEEDINGS: COURT OF APPEAL REFUSE GOOSE'S APPEAL : THE DANGERS OF OVERLOOKING THE BASIC OBLIGATION TO SERVE

SERVING PROCEEDINGS: COURT OF APPEAL REFUSE GOOSE’S APPEAL : THE DANGERS OF OVERLOOKING THE BASIC OBLIGATION TO SERVE

March 9, 2020 · by gexall · in Appeals, Civil Procedure, Injunctions, Members Content, Service of the claim form, Serving documents

In Canada Goose UK Retail Ltd & Anor v Unknown Persons [2020] EWCA Civ 303 the Court of Appeal upheld the judge’s decision not to grant the claimant any kind of relief due to a failure to properly serve the…

E BUNDLES: GUIDANCE FROM THE FINANCIAL REMEDIES COURT

E BUNDLES: GUIDANCE FROM THE FINANCIAL REMEDIES COURT

March 4, 2020 · by gexall · in Bundles, Case Management, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Useful links

The Courts and Tribunals Judiciary site has an “e-bundles protocol”. Since this is a sign of things to come it would benefit all practitioners to read it. THE GUIDANCE 4. Where an e-bundle is to be used the following technical…

SETTING ASIDE DEFAULT JUDGMENT: THE NEED FOR PROMPTNESS AND THE RELEVANCE OF THE DENTON CRITERIA

SETTING ASIDE DEFAULT JUDGMENT: THE NEED FOR PROMPTNESS AND THE RELEVANCE OF THE DENTON CRITERIA

March 2, 2020 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Relief from sanctions, Setting aside judgment

In Core-Export Spa -v- Yang Ming Marine Transportation Corp [2020] EWHC 425 (Comm) HHJ Pelling QC (sitting as a High Court Judge) refused an application to set aside a default judgment.  The defendant had an arguable defence, however its history…

EXPERT WITNESSES: HANDING THE JUDGE AN UNSORTED MEDLEY OF DOCUMENTS MAY NOT GO DOWN TOO WELL

EXPERT WITNESSES: HANDING THE JUDGE AN UNSORTED MEDLEY OF DOCUMENTS MAY NOT GO DOWN TOO WELL

February 24, 2020 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Credibility of experts, Expert evidence, Experts, Members Content

 There was one aspect of the evidence mentioned in the judgment Morrow v Shrewsbury Rugby Union Football Club Ltd [2020] EWHC 379 (QB) Mrs Justice Farbey that was somewhat unusual.  An expert handed the judge a “file of documents” to…

NEW MANDATORY REQUIREMENTS FOR WITNESS STATEMENTS IN APRIL: STATE THE PROCESS BY WHICH THE STATEMENT WAS OBTAINED

NEW MANDATORY REQUIREMENTS FOR WITNESS STATEMENTS IN APRIL: STATE THE PROCESS BY WHICH THE STATEMENT WAS OBTAINED

February 21, 2020 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Rule Changes, Witness statements

It is worth isolating one aspect of the changes to the rules relating to witness statements coming into force in April as a result of  The 113th update to Practice Direction Amendments.   That is the mandatory obligation in every witness statement…

WITNESS STATEMENTS IN FOREIGN LANGUAGES: CHANGES COMING INTO FORCE IN APRIL

WITNESS STATEMENTS IN FOREIGN LANGUAGES: CHANGES COMING INTO FORCE IN APRIL

February 21, 2020 · by gexall · in Appeals, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Rule Changes, Statements of Case, Statements of Truth

The 113th update to Practice Direction Amendments  introduces important changes to to witness statements in foreign languages  (Coming into force from the 6th April 2020).   CHANGES TO PRACTICE DIRECTION 22 – STATEMENTS OF TRUTH There are amendments and addition…

EARLY NEUTRAL EVALUATION BY THE COURTS: PRACTICAL GUIDANCE AS TO PROCEDURE AND IMPLEMENTATION

EARLY NEUTRAL EVALUATION BY THE COURTS: PRACTICAL GUIDANCE AS TO PROCEDURE AND IMPLEMENTATION

February 20, 2020 · by gexall · in Applications, Case Management, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content

There is a short judgment of Master McCloud today in Telecom Centre (UK) Ltd v Thomas Sanderson Ltd (Early Neutral Evaluation) [2020] EWHC 368 (QB)  which contains some important observations on the practical implementation of Early Neutral Evaluation by the…

ACCURATE TIME ESTIMATES: A ROUND UP OF THE CASES AND SOME GUIDANCE (IF YOU HAVE THE TIME TO READ IT...)

ACCURATE TIME ESTIMATES: A ROUND UP OF THE CASES AND SOME GUIDANCE (IF YOU HAVE THE TIME TO READ IT…)

February 20, 2020 · by gexall · in Applications, Case Management, Civil Procedure, Members Content

In Kazakhstan Kagazy Plc & Ors v Zhunus & Ors [2020] EWHC 128 (Comm) Mr Justice Andrew Baker made some observations about inadequate time estimates.  This criticism was specifically about applications in the Commercial Court.  However time estimates are an…

THE IMPORTANCE OF THE STATEMENT OF TRUTH (3): THE SCARY STUFF (THE REALLY SCARY STUFF)

THE IMPORTANCE OF THE STATEMENT OF TRUTH (3): THE SCARY STUFF (THE REALLY SCARY STUFF)

February 17, 2020 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Statements of Case, Statements of Truth, Witness statements

This is the third (and final) post in the series that examines the importance of the statement of truth.  Here we look at the clear and start warnings given by the courts about the importance of the statement of truth….

THE IMPORTANCE OF THE STATEMENT OF TRUTH (2): WHY LAWYERS SHOULD THINK (MORE THAN TWICE) BEFORE SIGNING IT

THE IMPORTANCE OF THE STATEMENT OF TRUTH (2): WHY LAWYERS SHOULD THINK (MORE THAN TWICE) BEFORE SIGNING IT

February 17, 2020 · by gexall · in Avoiding negligence claims, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Statements of Truth

Given the imminent changes to the statement of truth this is a good time to consider the problems that can occur when a lawyer signs a statement of truth on behalf of their client.  There are some cases that make…

THE IMPORTANCE OF THE STATEMENT OF TRUTH (1): WHY IT NEEDED "BEEFING UP" (THE RULES COMMITTEE COULD HAVE DONE THIS FIVE YEARS AGO...)

THE IMPORTANCE OF THE STATEMENT OF TRUTH (1): WHY IT NEEDED “BEEFING UP” (THE RULES COMMITTEE COULD HAVE DONE THIS FIVE YEARS AGO…)

February 15, 2020 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Rule Changes, Statements of Case, Statements of Truth

Yesterday was, by a long way, the busiest day on this blog ever.  The reason for this being that everyone is anxious to know the new wording for the statement truth.  There is a need for a short series on…

MORE RULE CHANGES IN APRIL: CHANGES TO THE STATEMENT OF TRUTH: YOU HAVE BEEN WARNED...

MORE RULE CHANGES IN APRIL: CHANGES TO THE STATEMENT OF TRUTH: YOU HAVE BEEN WARNED…

February 14, 2020 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Rule Changes, Statements of Truth, Witness statements

We are returning to the 113th update to Practice Direction Amendments.  This introduces important changes to to the wording of the statement of truth.  (Coming into force from the 6th April 2020). THE AMENDMENT The amendment makes changes to the…

NEW RULES COMING INTO FORCE: PLEADING SPECIFIC ISSUES IN RELATION TO THE HIRE OF A REPLACEMENT VEHICLE

NEW RULES COMING INTO FORCE: PLEADING SPECIFIC ISSUES IN RELATION TO THE HIRE OF A REPLACEMENT VEHICLE

February 13, 2020 · by gexall · in Civil Procedure, Damages, Members Content, Rule Changes, Statements of Case

The 113th update to Practice Direction Amendments comes into force on the 6th April 2020. It introduces new, and quite specific, obligations on a claimant claiming the cost of a replacement hire vehicle. THE NEW RULE There is a new Paragraph…

WITNESS STATEMENT SERVED 28 DAYS LATE: RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS REFUSED: ACTION STRUCK OUT: THE PERILS OF DELIBERATELY NOT COMPLYING WITH DIRECTIONS

WITNESS STATEMENT SERVED 28 DAYS LATE: RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS REFUSED: ACTION STRUCK OUT: THE PERILS OF DELIBERATELY NOT COMPLYING WITH DIRECTIONS

February 11, 2020 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Relief from sanctions, Striking out, Witness statements

I am grateful to barrister Andrew Worthley for drawing my attention to, and sending me a note of the decision in Syed -v- Shah [2020] 2 WLUK 15 where Trower J upheld a decision not to grant a claimant relief…

FIRST CLAIM FORM CASE OF THE YEAR: SERVICE WITHOUT A SEAL IS NOT GOOD SERVICE BUT CPR 3.10 SAVED THE CLAIMANT

FIRST CLAIM FORM CASE OF THE YEAR: SERVICE WITHOUT A SEAL IS NOT GOOD SERVICE BUT CPR 3.10 SAVED THE CLAIMANT

February 11, 2020 · by gexall · in Civil Procedure, Members Content, Sanctions, Service of the claim form, Serving documents, Uncategorized

NB THE USE OF CPR 3.10 IS MOST PROBABLY NOT AN EFFECTIVE STRATEGY FOLLOWING THE COURT OF APPEAL JUDGMENT IN Ideal Shopping Direct Ltd & Ors v Mastercard Incorporated & Ors [2022] EWCA Civ 14. It took until the 31st January…

MARGARET THATCHER, BETAMAX VIDEOS, THE MACARENA AND CIVIL PROCEDURE (ECHOES OF COMPLAINTS FROM "DOWN UNDER")

MARGARET THATCHER, BETAMAX VIDEOS, THE MACARENA AND CIVIL PROCEDURE (ECHOES OF COMPLAINTS FROM “DOWN UNDER”)

February 9, 2020 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil Procedure, Members Content

The judgment of Lord Justice Coulson in  Lejonvarn v Burgess & Anor [2020] EWCA Civ 114 commenting on a case “with echoes of the bad old days” shares some sentiments with the judgment of Lee J in the Federal Court of…

THE DANGERS OF MAKING ORDERS FOR SPLIT TRIALS: DECISION AT TRIAL SET ASIDE DUE TO A SERIOUS PROCEDURAL IRREGULARITY

THE DANGERS OF MAKING ORDERS FOR SPLIT TRIALS: DECISION AT TRIAL SET ASIDE DUE TO A SERIOUS PROCEDURAL IRREGULARITY

February 7, 2020 · by gexall · in Appeals, Applications, Case Management, Civil Procedure, Members Content

The judgment of Mr Justice Murray today in Sharn Panesar Ltd v Pistachios In The Park Ltd & Anor [2020] EWHC 194 (QB) illustrates some of the dangers of holding a trial on a preliminary issue. In this case a…

LUTON COUNTY COURT IS MOVING: BEAR THAT IN MIND OVER THE NEXT FEW WEEKS (AND AFTER THAT...)

LUTON COUNTY COURT IS MOVING: BEAR THAT IN MIND OVER THE NEXT FEW WEEKS (AND AFTER THAT…)

February 6, 2020 · by gexall · in Civil Procedure, Members Content

It is difficult to describe the feeling when you turn up at a court that you have been going through for many years and it isn’t there.  It happened to me years ago when York County Court moved from one…

JUDGMENT IN DEFAULT - AFTER DEFENCE IS DUE BUT WHEN DEFENCE IS FILED LATE: ISSUE TO BE DETERMINED BY THE COURT OF APPEAL

JUDGMENT IN DEFAULT – AFTER DEFENCE IS DUE BUT WHEN DEFENCE IS FILED LATE: ISSUE TO BE DETERMINED BY THE COURT OF APPEAL

February 5, 2020 · by gexall · in Appeals, Applications, Civil Procedure, Default judgment,, Members Content, Setting aside judgment

An earlier post dealt with rule changes that come into force in April in relation to default judgment being entered. The new rules make it clear that judgment cannot be entered if the court has received an acknowledgement of service…

LATE COSTS BUDGET: RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS GRANTED: DEFENDANT DROPPED THE BALL BUT THIS WAS FORGIVABLE

LATE COSTS BUDGET: RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS GRANTED: DEFENDANT DROPPED THE BALL BUT THIS WAS FORGIVABLE

February 5, 2020 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil Procedure, Costs, Costs budgeting, Members Content, Relief from sanctions

In Manchester Shipping Ltd v Balfour Shipping Ltd & Anor [2020] EWHC 164 (Comm) Lionel Persey QC (sitting as a Deputy High Court Judge) granted relief from sanctions to a defendant who had filed a costs budget late.  The case…

WITNESS STATEMENTS, WITNESS EVIDENCE AND SELF-PROTECTION FOR THE LAWYER

WITNESS STATEMENTS, WITNESS EVIDENCE AND SELF-PROTECTION FOR THE LAWYER

February 5, 2020 · by gexall · in Avoiding negligence claims, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Conduct, Members Content, Witness statements

Every few years I repeat advice given in relation to the need for “self-protection” when drafting witness statements.  This is often caused by something I have seen in practice, questions I am asked, or a transcript of a case.  The…

STAYING SANE AS A LITIGATOR 9: SHARING THE "PAIN"

STAYING SANE AS A LITIGATOR 9: SHARING THE “PAIN”

February 4, 2020 · by gexall · in Avoiding negligence claims, Civil Procedure, Expert evidence, Experts, Extensions of time, Members Content, Well being

Most of the burden of complying with time periods and court orders lies with the solicitor. However a solicitor’s life can be made easier by making sure that all those concerned with the litigation process know of the deadlines involved…

← Previous 1 … 37 38 39 … 65 Next →

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email. Subscription notifies you of a new post, it does not give you access to members' content.

Join 12.3K other subscribers

Recent Posts

  • THE NEW SRA GUIDANCE ON SUPERVISION 7: RECORDING ARRANGMENTS (IF IT ISN’T WRITTEN DOWN IT HASN’T HAPPENED…)
  • AN APPLICATION TO SET A DEFAULT JUDGMENT ASIDE (3): THE DENTON CRITERIA CONSIDERED
  • AN APPLICATION TO SET A DEFAULT JUDGMENT ASIDE (2): CONSIDERATION OF “PROMPTNESS” WHEN NOTHING HAPPENED FOR A YEAR…
  • THE NEW SRA GUIDANCE ON EFFECTIVE SUPERVISION 6: WHAT IS MEANT BY THE “CONDUCT OF LITIGATION”? (IT TURNS OUT ITS A MATTER OF “PROFESSIONAL JUDGMENT”)
  • AN APPLICATION TO SET A DEFAULT JUDGMENT ASIDE (1): THE EVIDENCE AS TO THE MERITS: THE JUDGE SHOULD NOT HAVE CONDUCTED A “MINI TRIAL”

Top Posts

NEW COURT FEES COMING INTO FORCE ON THE 13th JULY 2026: SOME BRAND NEW PROVISIONS AND THE INFLATIONARY INCREASES: THE CIVIL AND FAMILY COURTS, THE MAGISTRATES' COURT, THE LANDS CHAMBER (AND MANY OTHERS)
COST BITES 403: JUDGMENT TODAY: SUCCESS FEE AND ATE PREMIUM NOT PAYABLE BY CLIENT WHEN THE SOLICITOR FAILED TO MAKE REASONABLE ENQUIRIES ABOUT BTE INSURANCE
DESIGNATED CIVIL JUDGES SHOULD BE CAREFUL WHO IS GIVEN THE TASK OF TRYING COMPLEX TRIALS: COURT OF APPEAL MISSIVE TO DESIGNATED CIVIL JUDGES (& MANY OTHERS...)
A NEW SERIES OF USEFUL ONLINE CALCULATORS FOR LITIGATORS AND THE LEGAL PROFESSION (WITH A 20% DISCOUNT FOR CLB READERS): MAKING IT ALL ADD UP
BACK TO BASICS MONDAY: MAKING AN APPLICATION TO THE COURT: HOW TO AVOID PROBLEMS: KEY POINTS AND SOME USEFUL CHECKLISTS

Archives

Blogroll

  • Fatal Accident Law
  • Legal Futures
  • Personal injury: Liability and Damages

Books

  • Munkman & Exall on Damages for Personal Injuries and Death 15th ed
  • The APIL Guide to Fatal Accidents 4th edition

Useful Links

  • Buntools (for preparing PDF Bundles)
  • Kings Chambers
  • Kings Chambers Costs & Litigation Funding
  • Kings Chambers Serious Injury
  • The Civil Procedure Rules
  • The Law Society Gazette
  • The National Archives Recently Published Judgments
  • The Senior Court Costs Office Guide 2025
  • www.Bailii.org

Copyright

© Gordon Exall, Exall Legal Training, Civil Litigation Brief, 2013-2026. Unauthorised use and or duplication of the material contained on this blog without permission is strictly prohibited.
Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.

To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
  • Membership Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Advertising Policy
  • Copyright
  • Legal Disclaimer

Copyright © 2026 Civil Litigation Brief ®

Powered by Big Yellow Workshop

Loading Comments...

You must be logged in to post a comment.