Civil Litigation Brief ®
Menu
  • Home
  • About
  • Membership Plans
  • Webinars
  • Login
Updates and Commentary on Civil Procedure, by Gordon Exall, Barrister, Kings Chambers
Browse: Home » Coronavirus » Page 2
THE ADVOCATE BEHIND THE MASK: NEW GUIDANCE ON FACE COVERINGS FROM MONDAY 27th JULY 2020

THE ADVOCATE BEHIND THE MASK: NEW GUIDANCE ON FACE COVERINGS FROM MONDAY 27th JULY 2020

July 24, 2020 · by gexall · in Civil Procedure, Coronavirus, Members Content

The  Kings Chambers’ blog contains the full text of a letter from Susan Acland-Hood relating to the wearing of face coverings in court and tribunal buildings from Monday the 27th July 2020.   WEARING FACE COVERINGS IN THE PUBLIC AREAS…

NEW PRACTICE DIRECTION DEALING WITH PROCEDURE RELATING TO POSSESSION PROCEEDINGS FOLLOWING LIFTING OF THE STAY

NEW PRACTICE DIRECTION DEALING WITH PROCEDURE RELATING TO POSSESSION PROCEEDINGS FOLLOWING LIFTING OF THE STAY

July 21, 2020 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Coronavirus, Members Content, Rule Changes

A new Practice Direction comes into force on the 23rd August 2020. Practice Direction 55C.    This deals with the procedure to be adopted in relation to those actions that have been stayed by reason of the Practice Direction and…

REMOTE HEARINGS: THE PLACE WHERE WITNESSES GIVE EVIDENCE FROM MUST BE APPROVED IN ADVANCE BY THE COURT

REMOTE HEARINGS: THE PLACE WHERE WITNESSES GIVE EVIDENCE FROM MUST BE APPROVED IN ADVANCE BY THE COURT

July 17, 2020 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil evidence, Coronavirus, Members Content, Remote hearings

We looked earlier at the judgment in Navigator Equities Ltd & Anor v Deripaska [2020] EWHC 1798 (Comm) in relation to committal proceedings. That judgment also has some important guidance about the way in which remote hearings are conducted and where…

CORONAVIRUS LAW: APPEAL ON POSSESSION ISSUES STAYED BY PD51Z:  NO SALAMI SLICING OF CASES WHERE A LANDLORD IS SEEKING POSSESSION

CORONAVIRUS LAW: APPEAL ON POSSESSION ISSUES STAYED BY PD51Z: NO SALAMI SLICING OF CASES WHERE A LANDLORD IS SEEKING POSSESSION

July 3, 2020 · by gexall · in Appeals, Civil Procedure, Coronavirus, Members Content

In the judgment in TFS Stores Ltd v The Designer Retail Outlet Centres (Mansfield) General Partner Ltd & Ors[2020] EWCA Civ 833 the Court of Appeal (by a majority) stayed a number of appeals, holding that they were possession proceedings…

Civil Procedure (Coronavirus): BLOG AND ARTICLES ROUNDUP - JUNE 2020

Civil Procedure (Coronavirus): BLOG AND ARTICLES ROUNDUP – JUNE 2020

July 1, 2020 · by gexall · in Case Management, Coronavirus, Members Content, Useful links

This round up looks at the impact that COVID-19 is having on the law, and procedure in particular.  The key cases in relation to the impact of coronavirus were  considered in the post on the Kings Chambers’ blog Coronavirus: How…

JUDGMENT SET ASIDE WHEN DEFAULT WAS OBTAINED BECAUSE OF "LOCKDOWN": LITIGATORS MUST BE AWARE THAT THE WORLD SHIFTED ON ITS AXIS ON 23 MARCH 2020

JUDGMENT SET ASIDE WHEN DEFAULT WAS OBTAINED BECAUSE OF “LOCKDOWN”: LITIGATORS MUST BE AWARE THAT THE WORLD SHIFTED ON ITS AXIS ON 23 MARCH 2020

June 28, 2020 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil Procedure, Coronavirus, Members Content, Relief from sanctions, Setting aside judgment

The judgment of Mr Justice Julian Knowles in  Stanley v London Borough of Tower Hamlets [2020] EWHC 1622 (QB) is the first reference I have seen to that part of CPR PD51ZA that deals  the court’s general discretion when faced…

GOING BACK INTO COURT: MY FIRST EXPERIENCE OF  A SOCIALLY DISTANCED TRIAL

GOING BACK INTO COURT: MY FIRST EXPERIENCE OF A SOCIALLY DISTANCED TRIAL

June 25, 2020 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Coronavirus, Members Content

Yesterday I had my first experience since “lockdown” of going back into a court building to do a trial.  I did a series of tweets about it and they have had some attention.  That is why i thought it best…

CORONAVIRUS LAW: SHOULD A HEARING BE IN PERSON OR BY VIDEO?

CORONAVIRUS LAW: SHOULD A HEARING BE IN PERSON OR BY VIDEO?

June 25, 2020 · by gexall · in Applications, Coronavirus, Members Content, Remote hearings

In Surrey Heath Borough Council v Robb & Ors [2020] EWHC 1650 (QB) Mr Justice Freedman  considered submissions that a hearing should take place in person. He held that there was an onus on part requesting a hearing in court…

CLINICAL NEGLIGENCE TRIAL HELD REMOTELY: AND IT WORKED WELL...

CLINICAL NEGLIGENCE TRIAL HELD REMOTELY: AND IT WORKED WELL…

June 22, 2020 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Clinical Negligence, Coronavirus, Members Content, Remote hearings

I have highlighted some cases where remote hearings have had difficulties. In Jones v Ministry of Defence [2020] EWHC 1603 (QB) the judgment indicates that the remote hearing in a clinical negligence case worked well. THE CASE The case was…

THE (NOT SO) LONELY LITIGATOR'S CLUB 31: THE  MUSICAL SECTION: NIKOLAS CLARKE - THE CONDUCTOR'S TALE

THE (NOT SO) LONELY LITIGATOR’S CLUB 31: THE MUSICAL SECTION: NIKOLAS CLARKE – THE CONDUCTOR’S TALE

June 19, 2020 · by gexall · in Coronavirus, Members Content, Well being

Having had 30 lawyers write about their experiences in lockdown it is now time to vary the membership. Indeed  the club constitution requires us to lighten the mood and provide cheer to the profession.  So I have decided to expand…

THE (NOT SO) LONELY LITIGATOR'S CLUB: OUR THIRTY FOUNDING MEMBERS: WHERE WILL THE CLUB GO FROM HERE?

THE (NOT SO) LONELY LITIGATOR’S CLUB: OUR THIRTY FOUNDING MEMBERS: WHERE WILL THE CLUB GO FROM HERE?

June 18, 2020 · by gexall · in Coronavirus, Members Content, Well being

We now have thirty founding members of  The (not so) Lonely Litigator’s Club.  I started the  club in the hope that it would give some people some support during lockdown by seeing how other lawyers are coping  whilst working at…

WHEN REMOTE HEARINGS GO WRONG: AND STRUGGLING THROUGH TO PUT THEM RIGHT - AT WHOSE COSTS?

WHEN REMOTE HEARINGS GO WRONG: AND STRUGGLING THROUGH TO PUT THEM RIGHT – AT WHOSE COSTS?

June 17, 2020 · by gexall · in Arbitration,, Case Management, Civil Procedure, Coronavirus, Members Content, Remote hearings

I often listen to, and read, official statements about remote hearings with a degree of scepticism.   The impression is given that things are going smoothly. The reality is that things are often going awry and it is taking a great…

THE (NOT SO) LONELY LITIGATOR'S CLUB 30: OUR FINAL FOUNDING MEMBER MICHAEL WILLIAMSON:  " THAT ADMIRABLE SOLICITOR FROM CREWKERNE"

THE (NOT SO) LONELY LITIGATOR’S CLUB 30: OUR FINAL FOUNDING MEMBER MICHAEL WILLIAMSON: ” THAT ADMIRABLE SOLICITOR FROM CREWKERNE”

June 17, 2020 · by gexall · in Coronavirus, Members Content, Well being

This is the last post in this series in its current format.  The thirty club members to date are our “founding members”.   I started this series so lawyers could share their experiences of working through lockdown. Michael has dealt with…

THE (NOT SO) LONELY LITIGATOR'S CLUB 29: STEPHEN LOXTON: THE CLERK'S TALE

THE (NOT SO) LONELY LITIGATOR’S CLUB 29: STEPHEN LOXTON: THE CLERK’S TALE

June 17, 2020 · by gexall · in Coronavirus, Members Content, Well being

Next on our list of members is Stephen Loxton, Director of Clerking at Kings Chambers.  Steve is working from home with two young children for company.  He is one of hundreds (if not thousands)of people involved in the management of…

THE (NOT SO) LONELY LITIGATOR'S CLUB 28: DAVID WITHERS

THE (NOT SO) LONELY LITIGATOR’S CLUB 28: DAVID WITHERS

June 15, 2020 · by gexall · in Coronavirus, Members Content, Well being

There may, at times, be a slight Yorkshire bias to the selection of club members, be assured that this is not unconscious.  However I noticed that South Yorkshire was missing. Today we here from David Withers a partner at Irwin…

The Civil Procedure (Amendment No. 2) (Coronavirus) Rules 2020: EXTENDING STAY ON POSSESSION PROCEEDINGS UNTIL THE 23rd AUGUST 2020EEDINGS TO THE 23

The Civil Procedure (Amendment No. 2) (Coronavirus) Rules 2020: EXTENDING STAY ON POSSESSION PROCEEDINGS UNTIL THE 23rd AUGUST 2020EEDINGS TO THE 23

June 13, 2020 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil Procedure, Coronavirus, Members Content

These Regulations come into force on the 25th June 2020.  The put the stay on possession proceedings into the rules (they have  previously been in a Practice Direction).    The rules are available here . THE NEW RULES Citation and commencement…

CORONAVIRUS LAW: POSSESSION APPEAL HEARD IN STAY PERIOD: JUDGMENT WILL NOT BE GIVEN UNTIL END OF THE STAY

CORONAVIRUS LAW: POSSESSION APPEAL HEARD IN STAY PERIOD: JUDGMENT WILL NOT BE GIVEN UNTIL END OF THE STAY

June 13, 2020 · by gexall · in Appeals, Coronavirus, Members Content

The judgment of Mr Justice Cavanagh yesterday in  Bromford Housing Association Ltd v Nightingale & Anor [2020] EWHC 1532 (QB) is another variant of the issues relating to the stay of possession proceedings.  In this case the judge declined to…

CORONAVIRUS LAW: APPLICATION TO ADJOURN HEARING REFUSED: JUSTICE DELAYED IS JUSTICE DENIED

CORONAVIRUS LAW: APPLICATION TO ADJOURN HEARING REFUSED: JUSTICE DELAYED IS JUSTICE DENIED

June 12, 2020 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil Procedure, Coronavirus, Members Content

The decision of Mr Justice MacDonald today in Lancashire County Council v M & Ors (COVID-19 Adjournment Application) [2020] EWFC 43  is another case where an application to adjourn because of Covid concerns was refused. The judge held that an…

BACK TO COURT: USEFUL ADVICE AND LINKS FOR KEEPING SAFE  WHILST OUT AND ABOUT IN A PANDEMIC

BACK TO COURT: USEFUL ADVICE AND LINKS FOR KEEPING SAFE WHILST OUT AND ABOUT IN A PANDEMIC

June 12, 2020 · by gexall · in Coronavirus, Members Content, Well being

The courts are, gradually, re-opening.  Civil and criminal hearings are taking place.  We have to trust that steps are being taken to protect our health. I asked on Twitter for advice that people had in relation to getting to, and…

CORONAVIRUS LAW: COVID IS NOT GOING TO BE USED AS A REASON TO ALLOW A LATE AMENDMENT TO A DEFENCE

CORONAVIRUS LAW: COVID IS NOT GOING TO BE USED AS A REASON TO ALLOW A LATE AMENDMENT TO A DEFENCE

June 11, 2020 · by gexall · in Amendment, Applications, Coronavirus, Members Content

In the judgment today in Pearce v East and North Hertfordshire NHS Trust [2020] EWHC 1504 (QB) Mrs Justice Lambert considered an argument that the Coronavirus epidemic could play a part in the defendant’s application to amend its defence.  …

TRANSPARENCY PROJECT: REMOTE COURT HEARINGS GUIDANCE NOTE

TRANSPARENCY PROJECT: REMOTE COURT HEARINGS GUIDANCE NOTE

June 10, 2020 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Coronavirus, Members Content, Remote hearings

The Transparency Project have produced a Remote Court Hearings Guidance Note.  This is aimed at litigants themselves. Although it is quite specifically aimed at the Family Courts many litigants (and some lawyers) may find this of some assistance.   THE…

CORONAVIRUS LAW IN THE COURT OF APPEAL: A HYBRID HEARING WILL NOT BE UNFAIR IF LEADING COUNSEL CANNOT ATTEND IN PERSON

CORONAVIRUS LAW IN THE COURT OF APPEAL: A HYBRID HEARING WILL NOT BE UNFAIR IF LEADING COUNSEL CANNOT ATTEND IN PERSON

June 10, 2020 · by gexall · in Appeals, Coronavirus, Members Content

In the judgment today in C (Children : Covid-19: Representation) [2020] EWCA Civ 734 the Court of Appeal dismissed an argument that a “hybrid” hearing, to be heard with one side’s leading counsel attending remotely, was unfair.   THE CASE…

PROCEEDINGS BEFORE QUEEN'S BENCH MASTERS FROM 15th JUNE 2020: (EVEN THOUGH YOU'RE NOT GOING TO EQUITY YOU WILL HAVE CLEAN HANDS...)

PROCEEDINGS BEFORE QUEEN’S BENCH MASTERS FROM 15th JUNE 2020: (EVEN THOUGH YOU’RE NOT GOING TO EQUITY YOU WILL HAVE CLEAN HANDS…)

June 10, 2020 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil Procedure, Coronavirus, Members Content

A further bulletin has been issued which sets out the procedure for hearings before Queen’s Bench Masters from the 15th June.  The default position is that hearings will be heard remotely. If an “in person” hearing is needed then it…

CIVIL JUSTICE COUNCIL REPORT ON THE IMPACT OF COVID-19 ON CIVIL COURT USERS

CIVIL JUSTICE COUNCIL REPORT ON THE IMPACT OF COVID-19 ON CIVIL COURT USERS

June 8, 2020 · by gexall · in Civil Procedure, Coronavirus, Members Content

It is not possible to have anything but admiration for the way in which the Civil Justice Council have produced their report on the impact of COVID-19 on civil court users.   The report is available here.  It carried out what…

CORONAVIRUS LAW: DEFENDANT'S APPLICATION TO ADJOURN TRIAL REFUSED: TRIAL CAN GO AHEAD IN PERSON (AND WOULD GO AHEAD EVEN IF HELD REMOTELY)

CORONAVIRUS LAW: DEFENDANT’S APPLICATION TO ADJOURN TRIAL REFUSED: TRIAL CAN GO AHEAD IN PERSON (AND WOULD GO AHEAD EVEN IF HELD REMOTELY)

June 5, 2020 · by gexall · in Adjournments, Civil Procedure, Clinical Negligence, Coronavirus, Members Content

In the judgment in  SC v University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust (Rev 2) [2020] EWHC 1445 (QB) given yesterday Mr Justice Johnson refused the defendant’s application for an adjournment on the grounds that a trial held remotely would be…

CORONAVIRUS LAW: FURLOUGHED EMPLOYEES GIVING EVIDENCE AT COURT IS NOT "WORK"

CORONAVIRUS LAW: FURLOUGHED EMPLOYEES GIVING EVIDENCE AT COURT IS NOT “WORK”

June 5, 2020 · by gexall · in Civil Procedure, Coronavirus, Members Content

I am grateful to barrister Tom Herbert from bringing my attention to Nottinghamshire Law Society Civil Court User Bulletin No 5. It is a case, Fottles v Bourne Leisure, where HHJ Godsmark QC allowed an application to vacate. However during…

CORONAVIRUS LAW: COVID NOT A GOOD REASON TO CHANGE NORMAL RULE AS TO COSTS FOLLOWING DISCONTINUANCE

CORONAVIRUS LAW: COVID NOT A GOOD REASON TO CHANGE NORMAL RULE AS TO COSTS FOLLOWING DISCONTINUANCE

June 5, 2020 · by gexall · in Civil Procedure, Coronavirus, Costs, Members Content

In Khan v Governor of HMP The Mount & Anor [2020] EWHC 1367  Mr Justice Spencer considered, and rejected, an argument that a different costs order should be made because of the impact of coronavirus.   THE CASE The claimant…

CORONAVIRUS LAW: STAY LIFTED SOLELY FOR THE PURPOSE OF HANDING DOWN APPEAL JUDGMENT

CORONAVIRUS LAW: STAY LIFTED SOLELY FOR THE PURPOSE OF HANDING DOWN APPEAL JUDGMENT

June 4, 2020 · by gexall · in Appeals, Coronavirus, Members Content

In Copeland v Bank of Scotland Plc [2020] EWHC 1441 (QB) Mr Justice Freedman lifted the stay on possession proceedings for the purpose of handing down a judgment on appeal.   THE CASE The action related to possession proceedings brought…

SOME LAWYERS HAVE WRITTEN POEMS ABOUT COVID AND THE LAW, I'VE JUST READ IT TWICE  NOW AND I'M SIMPLY IN AWE

SOME LAWYERS HAVE WRITTEN POEMS ABOUT COVID AND THE LAW, I’VE JUST READ IT TWICE NOW AND I’M SIMPLY IN AWE

June 4, 2020 · by gexall · in Book Review, Coronavirus, Members Content

Quite a few decades  – possibly to the day – since I finished my A Level English Literature  exam I find myself reviewing a book of poetry. (Mrs Turner and Mr Payne were right, these skills would come in handy…

MORE CORONAVIRUS LAW:  HEALTH PROTECTION REGULATIONS BAN ON RELIGIOUS GATHERING NOT REMOVED BY INJUNCTION

MORE CORONAVIRUS LAW: HEALTH PROTECTION REGULATIONS BAN ON RELIGIOUS GATHERING NOT REMOVED BY INJUNCTION

June 3, 2020 · by gexall · in Coronavirus, Injunctions, Members Content

In Hussain, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for Health & Social Care [2020] EWHC 1392 (Admin) Mr Justice Swift refused an application for interim relief to allow attendance at religious services.  The application requested the prevention…

MORE CORONAVIRUS LAW: ORDER TO RESTRAIN WINDING UP PETITION: WHERE THERE'S A BILL THERE IS A WAY

MORE CORONAVIRUS LAW: ORDER TO RESTRAIN WINDING UP PETITION: WHERE THERE’S A BILL THERE IS A WAY

June 2, 2020 · by gexall · in Applications, Coronavirus, Members Content

The judgment of Mr Justice Morgan today in A Company (Injunction To Restrain Presentation of Petition) [2020] EWHC 1406 (Ch) is another example of “coronavirus law”.  The judge made an order restraining the presentation of a winding up petition not…

CIVIL PROCEDURE (CORONAVIRUS): BLOG AND ARTICLES ROUND UP  - MAY 2020

CIVIL PROCEDURE (CORONAVIRUS): BLOG AND ARTICLES ROUND UP – MAY 2020

June 1, 2020 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil Procedure, Coronavirus, Members Content

Articles and posts of interest to litigators in relation to civil procedure and Coronavirus. THE POSTS Courts Litigation Futures Court issues guidance on e-bundles for short applications Remote Hearings Litigation Futures “Uphill battle” to engage judges in remote JR hearings Litigation Futures ……

NO VARIATION TO COURT ORDER BECAUSE OF CORONOVIRUS: RESPONDENT DOES NOT GET TWO BITES OF THE CHERRY

NO VARIATION TO COURT ORDER BECAUSE OF CORONOVIRUS: RESPONDENT DOES NOT GET TWO BITES OF THE CHERRY

June 1, 2020 · by gexall · in Applications, Coronavirus, Damages, Members Content

It is likely that the Coronavirus epidemic is going to give rise to many issues in litigation.  Some of them unusual and unprecedented.   An example can be seen in the judgment today in Dinglis v Dinglis & Ors [2020] EWHC…

THE (NOT SO) LONELY LITIGATOR'S CLUB 26: GABOR COVAKS: THE MANDOLIN PLAYING SOLICITOR'S TALE

THE (NOT SO) LONELY LITIGATOR’S CLUB 26: GABOR COVAKS: THE MANDOLIN PLAYING SOLICITOR’S TALE

May 28, 2020 · by gexall · in Coronavirus, Members Content, Well being

The Club may be unique in legal history  because, in addition to promoting knowledge and skills about litigation, the constitution also has the aims of promoting laywers playing and listening to mandolin music.  That is just one of the reasons…

AUTOMATIC STAY OF POSSESSION HEARINGS APPLIES TO APPEALS: COURT OF APPEAL DECISION THIS MORNING

AUTOMATIC STAY OF POSSESSION HEARINGS APPLIES TO APPEALS: COURT OF APPEAL DECISION THIS MORNING

May 27, 2020 · by gexall · in Appeals, Civil Procedure, Coronavirus, Members Content

In London Borough of Hackney -v- Okoro [2020] EWCA Civ 681 the Court of Appeal found that the automatic stay on possession proceedings also applies to appeals against possession orders.     THE CASE The Court of Appeal were asked…

CIVIL UPDATE FOR NORTH AND WEST YORKSHIRE: UPDATED GUIDANCE FROM THE DESIGNATED CIVIL JUDGE

CIVIL UPDATE FOR NORTH AND WEST YORKSHIRE: UPDATED GUIDANCE FROM THE DESIGNATED CIVIL JUDGE

May 22, 2020 · by gexall · in Access to justice, Civil Procedure, Coronavirus, Members Content, Remote hearings

HHJ Gosnell has issued new guidance for civil courts in North and West Yorkshire. It is reproduced in full below.   “Introduction The purpose of this document is to update you on events since my last update on 6th April…

AMENDED LISTING PRIORITIES IN THE COUNTY COURT

AMENDED LISTING PRIORITIES IN THE COUNTY COURT

May 22, 2020 · by gexall · in Civil Procedure, Coronavirus, Members Content

The listing priorities in the county court were amended on 14.05.2020.   “Introduction 1. Listing is a judicial function. 2. All applications/hearings/trials should be considered in advance by a judge in order for the judge to decide whether it should…

THE (NOT SO) LONELY LITIGATOR'S CLUB 25: CLAIRE GREEN: THE COST LAWYER'S TALE (OR TWO TAILS IN FACT)

THE (NOT SO) LONELY LITIGATOR’S CLUB 25: CLAIRE GREEN: THE COST LAWYER’S TALE (OR TWO TAILS IN FACT)

May 21, 2020 · by gexall · in Coronavirus, Costs, Members Content, Well being

Our club is going to need a costs lawyer or two. So for our first costs lawyer member I went straight to the top. Claire Green is currently Chairman of the Association of  Costs Lawyers ( ACL) as well as…

HMCTS GUIDANCE "Keeping court and tribunal buildings safe, secure and clean"

HMCTS GUIDANCE “Keeping court and tribunal buildings safe, secure and clean”

May 21, 2020 · by gexall · in Coronavirus, Members Content

HMCTS have recently updated their guidance about  security, cleaning and social-distancing arrangements in court and tribunal buildings during the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic.  Some of the guidance puts obligations on lawyers and court users.  Having successfully avoided the pun for two…

THE (NOT SO) LONELY LITIGATOR'S CLUB 24: ROBERT MALES: THE MANAGING PARTNER'S TALE

THE (NOT SO) LONELY LITIGATOR’S CLUB 24: ROBERT MALES: THE MANAGING PARTNER’S TALE

May 20, 2020 · by gexall · in Coronavirus, Members Content, Well being

The latest member of our club is Robert Males. As you may be able to guess from the photo Robert is managing partner of Underwoods Solicitors of Hemel Hempstead Hertfordshire and Cape Town, South Africa.   Where are you working…

GENERAL GUIDANCE ON PDF BUNDLES FOR HEARINGS IN COURTS: GUIDANCE ISSUED TODAY

GENERAL GUIDANCE ON PDF BUNDLES FOR HEARINGS IN COURTS: GUIDANCE ISSUED TODAY

May 20, 2020 · by gexall · in Bundles, Case Management, Coronavirus, Members Content

Mr Justice Mann has issued the following guidance on PDF bundles today. It provides practical guidance as to the matters that should be included in bundles, including the need for optical recognition, the need for the documents to be in…

THE (NOT SO) LONELY LITIGATOR'S CLUB 23: SASHA BEAUMONT-HODGES: THE LAW STUDENT'S TALE

THE (NOT SO) LONELY LITIGATOR’S CLUB 23: SASHA BEAUMONT-HODGES: THE LAW STUDENT’S TALE

May 17, 2020 · by gexall · in Coronavirus, Members Content, Well being

It is important for the future of the club that we encourage young members and are aware of the difficulties that they are going through at the moment. For that reason I invited law student Sasha Beaumont-Hughes to become a…

THE (NOT SO) LONELY LITIGATOR'S CLUB 22: PAUL MAGRATH: THE LAW REPORTER'S TALE

THE (NOT SO) LONELY LITIGATOR’S CLUB 22: PAUL MAGRATH: THE LAW REPORTER’S TALE

May 15, 2020 · by gexall · in Coronavirus, Members Content, Well being

It occurred to me that a law reporter would would be a very helpful, in not essential,  addition to our club ( I have checked and the club rules allow this). So I asked Paul Magrath to join. Paul  is…

COVID REPEATS 22: DRESSING FOR COURT: NO RIPPED JEANS, BUT NO TOP HAT,  TAILS AND SPATS EITHER

COVID REPEATS 22: DRESSING FOR COURT: NO RIPPED JEANS, BUT NO TOP HAT, TAILS AND SPATS EITHER

May 15, 2020 · by gexall · in Advocacy, Conduct, Coronavirus, Members Content

I thought hard about whether repeating a post about dressing for court is appropriate for the current times. We will have to go back to court one day, and current guidance dictates that (the top half of us at least)…

COVID REPEATS 21: OPENING LINES OF JUDGMENTS (WITH SOME NEW ONES THROWN IN): BJORN AGAIN

COVID REPEATS 21: OPENING LINES OF JUDGMENTS (WITH SOME NEW ONES THROWN IN): BJORN AGAIN

May 14, 2020 · by gexall · in Civil Procedure, Coronavirus, Members Content

Today we are looking at opening lines of judgment.  We also have a new opening line from earlier this year.   ABBA: (ALTHOUGH THE WINNER DIDN’T TAKE IT ALL…) In April this year in a judgment about an inheritance dispute…

COVID REPEATS 20: CIVIL LITIGATION BRIEF 26 YEARS AGO: PROCEDURAL DEVELOPMENT IN 1994

COVID REPEATS 20: CIVIL LITIGATION BRIEF 26 YEARS AGO: PROCEDURAL DEVELOPMENT IN 1994

May 13, 2020 · by gexall · in Applications, Bundles, Coronavirus, Members Content, Relief from sanctions

Six years ago I reviewed the annual output of Civil Litigation Brief in 1994 so, in essence, this is a repeat of a repeat. There were no “blogs” back. Twenty six ago CLB  was a monthly column in the Solicitors…

CHALLENGES TO THE VALIDITY OF PRACTICE DIRECTION MADE AS A RESPONSE TO CORONAVIRUS:  THIS IS A PILOT SCHEME

CHALLENGES TO THE VALIDITY OF PRACTICE DIRECTION MADE AS A RESPONSE TO CORONAVIRUS: THIS IS A PILOT SCHEME

May 12, 2020 · by gexall · in Appeals, Civil evidence, Coronavirus, Members Content

In Arkin -v- Marshall [2020] EWCA Civ 620 the Court of Appeal rejected an argument that  Practice Direction 51Z  was ultra vires. The Practice Direction which provides for a stay of possession proceedings during the coronavirus crisis was held to…

THE (NOT SO) LONELY LITIGATOR'S CLUB 21: DONNA SCULLY: FROM DUBLIN TO LIVERPOOL

THE (NOT SO) LONELY LITIGATOR’S CLUB 21: DONNA SCULLY: FROM DUBLIN TO LIVERPOOL

May 12, 2020 · by gexall · in Coronavirus, Members Content, Well being

Our newest member practices in Liverpool. Donna Scully. Originally from Dublin Donna qualified as a solicitor at the age of 30 and is now director of the Carpenters Group.   I am Irish, from Dublin.  I am a joint owner/Director…

COVID REPEATS 18: "BEHIND THE DIFFIDENT SMILE OF THE SHYEST JUNIOR IS A CONCEIT OF NAPOLEONIC PROPORTIONS"

COVID REPEATS 18: “BEHIND THE DIFFIDENT SMILE OF THE SHYEST JUNIOR IS A CONCEIT OF NAPOLEONIC PROPORTIONS”

May 11, 2020 · by gexall · in Advocacy, Applications, Coronavirus, Members Content

Today we travel to Australia and looking again at  guidance given by the Hon Chief Justice Pat Keane in his keynote address to the Australian Lawyers Alliance Queensland State Conference in February 2013. Remember the main aim of these posts…

THE (NOT SO) LONELY LITIGATOR'S CLUB 20: SNIGDHA NAG: THE LAW LECTURER'S VIEW

THE (NOT SO) LONELY LITIGATOR’S CLUB 20: SNIGDHA NAG: THE LAW LECTURER’S VIEW

May 10, 2020 · by gexall · in Coronavirus, Members Content, Well being

It is well known that the constitution of the Club requires us to “encourage and educate the legal profession and public in the importance and rules of civil procedure”. Naturally, therefore, the Club needs law lecturers to help us in…

← Previous 1 2 3 … 5 Next →

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email. Subscription notifies you of a new post, it does not give you access to members' content.

Join 12.3K other subscribers

Recent Posts

  • THE APIL FATAL ACCIDENTS WEBINAR SERIES 2026: SEVEN WEBINARS TO HELP NEGOTIATE THIS DIFFICULT AREA OF LAW AND PRACTICE
  • WHOSE EXPERT EVIDENCE IS GOING TO BE ACCEPTED AT TRIAL? PERSONAL INJURY: WEBINAR 3rd JUNE 2026
  • THE CURRENT IMPORTANCE OF PLEADINGS 79: COURT REJECTS CLAIMANT’S AMENDMENT APPLICATION BECAUSE THERE WERE “REASONABLY ARGUABLE” ISSUES IN RELATION TO LIMITATION
  • THE CURRENT IMPORTANCE OF PLEADINGS 78: CLAIMANT REFUSED PERMISSION TO AMEND PARTICULARS IN CLINICAL NEGLIGENCE/FATAL ACCIDENT CLAIM
  • THROWBACK FRIDAY: AMENDING PLEADINGS : A REVIEW OF THE PRINCIPLES: WHAT IS MEANT BY “LATE”? (MAY 2015)

Top Posts

  • A FIRM OF SOLICITORS ISSUED PROCEEDINGS WITHOUT AUTHORITY TO DO SO: ORDERED TO PAY £900,000 ON ACCOUNT OF COSTS: SOME EXPENSIVE LESSONS HERE...
  • COST BITES 386: THREATS TO REPORT THE DEFENDANTS' SOLICITORS TO THE SRA WAS ONE OF THE REASONS THE CLAIMANT HAD TO PAY COSTS ON AN INDEMNITY BASIS: WEAPONISERS BEWARE
  • ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND THE CITATION OF MISLEADING AUTHORITIES: ANOTHER WEEK, ANOTHER CASE: IF YOUR NAME IS ON THE DOCUMENT YOU "OWN" IT...
  • THROWBACK FRIDAY: LAWYERS FAILURE TO PROVIDE OVERSIGHT OF EXPERTS LEADS TO EXCLUSION OF THEIR EVIDENCE: EXPERT EVIDENCE IS “NOT A MATTER OF RIGHT” (MAY 2021)
  • COST BITES 385: THE COURTS SHOULD BE WARY OF DECIDING PRELIMINARY APPLICATIONS AND ISSUES ON A PROVISIONAL ASSESSMENT: THIS COULD UNDERMINE THE WHOLE PURPOSE OF THE REGIME

Archives

Blogroll

  • Fatal Accident Law
  • Legal Futures
  • Personal injury: Liability and Damages

Books

  • Munkman & Exall on Damages for Personal Injuries and Death 15th ed
  • The APIL Guide to Fatal Accidents 4th edition

Useful Links

  • Buntools (for preparing PDF Bundles)
  • Kings Chambers
  • Kings Chambers Costs & Litigation Funding
  • Kings Chambers Serious Injury
  • The Civil Procedure Rules
  • The Law Society Gazette
  • The National Archives Recently Published Judgments
  • The Senior Court Costs Office Guide 2025
  • www.Bailii.org

Copyright

© Gordon Exall, Exall Legal Training, Civil Litigation Brief, 2013-2026. Unauthorised use and or duplication of the material contained on this blog without permission is strictly prohibited.
Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.

To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
  • Membership Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Advertising Policy
  • Copyright
  • Legal Disclaimer

Copyright © 2026 Civil Litigation Brief ®

Powered by Big Yellow Workshop

Loading Comments...

You must be logged in to post a comment.