Civil Litigation Brief
Menu
  • Home
  • About
  • Membership Plans
  • Webinars
  • Login
Updates and Commentary on Civil Procedure, by Gordon Exall, Barrister, Kings Chambers
Browse: Home » Relief from sanctions » Page 11

THE DENTON PRINCIPLES AND SEEKING TO AVOID PAYING MONEY DUE UNDER COURT ORDERS

December 17, 2014 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil Procedure, Costs, Members Content, Relief from sanctions

The application of the Denton principles was considered by Mr Justice Peter Smith in Mulugeta Guadie Mangiste -v- Endownment Fund for the Rehabilitation of Tigray [2014] EWHC 4196 (Ch) when reviewing an argument that the claimant should not pay an order for…

EXTENSIONS OF TIME TO APPEAL: MITCHELL AND DENTON PRINCIPLES APPLY

December 16, 2014 · by gexall · in Appeals, Applications, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Relief from sanctions

In a combined decision in three cases heard today*  [2014] EWCA Civ 1633 the Court of Appeal set out important guidance in relation to applications to appeal out of time. Practitioners must be aware of the time limit for appeals,…

"THE LEAST MANAGEABLE CASE I HAVE EVER TRIED TO MANAGE": CASE MANAGEMENT UPHELD BY THE COURT OF APPEAL

December 16, 2014 · by gexall · in Appeals, Applications, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Relief from sanctions, Witness statements

This was the description given by His Honour Judge Mackie QC when he was considering, and refusing, an application by the defendant to strike the action out. The decisions he made were upheld by the Court of Appeal In Walsham…

WHEN APPLYING FOR RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS MAKE SURE THAT YOU APPLY FOR ALL OTHER RELEVANT FORMS OF RELIEF AS WELL

December 10, 2014 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Relief from sanctions

It is easy to overlook one aspect of the decision in British Gas Trading -v- Oak Cash & Carry [2014] EWHC 4058 (QB). In that case the judge overturned a decision granting relief from sanctions.  However she also indicated that…

DENTON, MITCHELL AND ADMINISTRATIVE LAW: PUBLIC INTEREST IS A "HIGHLY SIGNIFICANT FACTOR"

December 9, 2014 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Relief from sanctions

The Denton and Mitchell criteria were considered, in passing, in R (RA-Nigeria) -v- Secretary of State for the Home Department [2014] EWHC 4073(Admin). Where Andrew Thomas QC, sitting as a Deputy High Court Judge, considered an application that the Defendant…

POST-MITCHELL PRE-DENTON DECISION TO GRANT RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS OVERTURNED ON APPEAL

December 8, 2014 · by gexall · in Appeals, Applications, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Relief from sanctions

In British Gas Trading -v- Oak Cash & Carry [2014] EWHC 4058 (QB) Mrs Justice McGowan DBE overturned a decision granting a defendant relief from sanctions. What is particularly interesting is that the original decision was made post-Mitchell but prior…

SECOND ACTION AGAINST A DIFFERENT DEFENDANT STRUCK OUT FOR ABUSE OF PROCESS: ALCOCK -v- PARK BUSINESS CENTRES LIMITED

December 4, 2014 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Relief from sanctions, Risks of litigation, Second set of proceedings, Striking out

Should a second action, issued because the first was struck out for some reason, be struck out?  I am grateful to Charles Bagot of Hardwicke Chambers for sending me a copy of the transcript of a decision by District Judge…

DEVELOPMENTS SINCE DENTON: ALL THE POSTS AND CASES IN ONE PLACE

November 26, 2014 · by gexall · in Applications, Avoiding negligence claims, Civil Procedure, Costs, Members Content, Relief from sanctions, Useful links

We are now exactly one year on since Mitchell and 237 days since Denton. This is a good a time as any to review the Post Denton decisions on this blog. It is interesting that there were no reports in…

SUPREME COURT JUDGMENT: SIGNATURE OF DISCLOSURE LISTS, CASE MANAGEMENT AND COMPLIANCE

November 26, 2014 · by gexall · in Appeals, Applications, Civil Procedure, Disclosure, Members Content, Relief from sanctions

The Supreme Court judgment in HRH Prince Abdulaziz Bin Mishal bin Abdulaziz Al Saud (Appellant) v Apex GlobalManagement Ltd and another (Respondents) [2014] UKSC 64 contains some important observations in relation to disclosure and case management. BACKGROUND TO THE CASE This…

RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS REFUSED WHEN DEFENDANT WAS TACTICALLY PLAYING FOR TIME

November 25, 2014 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Relief from sanctions

In Talos Capital Ltd -v- JSC Investment Holding Ltd (QBC 21/11/14)* Flaux J refused an application for an extension of time to acknowledge service and challenge the jurisdiction in circumstances where the delay was held to be deliberate and tactical….

ONE YEAR LATE IN SERVING A WITNESS STATEMENT: RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS GRANTED – BUT ON TERMS

November 24, 2014 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Relief from sanctions

There is a report on Lawtel *of the case of Owners of Motor Vessel Coal Hunter -v- Owners of Motor Vessel Yusho Regulus (QBD Admiralty 20/11/2014, Teare J) where the court considered an application for permission to rely on a…

AN IMPORTANT CASE ON COSTS; "INTERESTED PARTY" COSTS; RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS AND SUMMARY ASSESSMENT

November 21, 2014 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil Procedure, Costs, Members Content, Relief from sanctions

In Group M Uk Ltd -v- The Cabinet Office  [2014] EWHC 3863 (TCC) Mr Justice Akenhead mad some important observations as to the liability to pay the costs of “interested parties”; the late serving of costs schedules; relief from sanctions…

CLAIMANTS HAD COMPLIED WITH PEREMPTORY ORDER: CASE NOT STRUCK OUT

November 20, 2014 · by gexall · in Appeals, Applications, Avoiding negligence claims, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Relief from sanctions

There is a brief report on Lawtel of the case of Sharma -v- Quality Redfern Solicitors (Ch D Judge Behrens 19/11/2014). The decision concerns the striking out of a claim for breach of an order and the judge finding, on…

RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS GRANTED DESPITE INADEQUATE REPLIES AND BREACH OF PEREMPTORY ORDER

November 17, 2014 · by gexall · in Civil Procedure, Members Content, Relief from sanctions

There is a brief report on Lawtel today of the decision of S Monty QC in In the matter of Bankside Hotels (Ch D 13/11/2014) Relief from sanctions was granted when a party was in breach of a peremptory order and failed…

APPLICATIONS TO SET ASIDE DEFAULT JUDGMENT & THE MITCHELL/DENTON PRINCIPLES: ANOTHER HIGH COURT CASE

November 16, 2014 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Relief from sanctions, Serving documents, Statements of Case

There are now several cases that deal with how the “Mitchell/Denton” principles effect applications to have judgment set aside. In Robinson -v- Kensington & Chelsea Royal London Borough (Sir Michael Tugendhat 03/011.204 QB)* a default judgment was set aside on…

COSTS SCHEDULE FILED LATE: COSTS ASSESSED AT NIL: NO RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS

November 8, 2014 · by gexall · in Civil Procedure, Costs, Members Content, Relief from sanctions

The short judgment of Deputy District Judge Apthorpe in Gretton -v- Santander [2014]Ew Mic B52(CC) demonstrate that Denton is not an authority that states that relief from sanctions is easy to obtain. The claimant failed to serve and file its…

LORD CHANCELLOR REFUSED RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS: CPR 3.9 APPLIES TO THE HIGH AND MIGHTY AS WELL

November 8, 2014 · by gexall · in Civil Procedure, Members Content, Relief from sanctions

In the  decision yesterday in Lord Chancellor -v- The former Partnership of Taylor Willocks Solicitors [2014] EWHC 3664 (QB) Globe J upheld a decision of Master Leslie refusing to grant the Lord Chancellor relief from sanctions.  The decision is interesting…

"IN TIME" APPLICATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO SERVE PARTICULARS OF CLAIM REFUSED: A DANGER AREA TO WATCH

November 4, 2014 · by gexall · in Appeals, Applications, Avoiding negligence claims, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Relief from sanctions

In Frontier Estates -v- Berwin Leighton Paisner (Ch D 30/10/2014)* John Male QC upheld a decision not to grant an extension of time for service of the particular of claim. What makes this case important is that the application was…

RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS CAN BE HEARD WITHOUT A FORMAL APPLICATION: CUTLER -V- BARNET

November 4, 2014 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Relief from sanctions

In Cutler -v- Barnet (QBD 31/10/14)* Supperstone J held that an application for relief from sanctions could be heard even if it were not made formally in writing. THE CASE The defendant was resisting a claim for possession. She had…

RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS REFUSED: DENTON MADE NO DIFFERENCE

November 3, 2014 · by gexall · in Appeals, Avoiding negligence claims, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Relief from sanctions

In Blemain Finance Ltd -v- Mukhtar &  Osman (28/10/14)* Globe J upheld a decision of the first instance judge refusing relief from sanctions. THE FACTS The claimant sought possession of the defendants’ home following a failure to pay. There was…

CASE NOT STRUCK OUT BECAUSE OF A FAILURE TO FILE TRIAL BUNDLE & PAY COURT FEES

November 3, 2014 · by gexall · in Appeals, Applications, Avoiding negligence claims, Civil Procedure, Costs, Members Content, Relief from sanctions

One of the most read posts on this blog was, in the middle of the Mitchell Madness period, when a judge struck out an action because the trial bundle had been lodged late.  This issue was considered by Hickinbottom J…

CASE STRUCK OUT BECAUSE DELAY WAS AN ABUSE OF PROCESS: WEARN -v- HNH CONSIDERED

October 30, 2014 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Relief from sanctions, Risks of litigation, Striking out

In Wearn -v- HNH International Holdings Ltd [2014] EWHC 3542 (Ch) Mr Justice Barling struck out a claim for delay, holding that the claimant’s delay amounted to an abuse of process. There are also a few interesting observations about the…

EXTENSIONS OF TIME: RESPONDENT'S NOTICES AND THE "MITCHELL" PRINCIPLES & THE "SERIOUSNESS AND SIGNIFICANCE OF THE BREACH"

October 29, 2014 · by gexall · in Appeals, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Relief from sanctions

The question of the general applicability, and the application, of “Mitchell” principles was considered today by the Court of Appeal in Altomart Ltd -v- Salford Estates (No 2) Limited [2014] EWHC 1408. The court considered the principles to be applied…

RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS GRANTED FOLLOWING FAILURE TO GIVE NOTIFICATION OF CFA & ATE

October 21, 2014 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil Procedure, Costs, Members Content, Relief from sanctions

In Caliendo -v- Mischon De Reya [2014] EWHC 3414 (Ch) Mr Justice Hildyard considered an application for relief from sanctions under the post-Denton regime.  He also made interesting observations in relation to applications in relation to considering the relevance of…

CHALLENGING THE AUTHENTICITY OF DOCUMENTS: THE IMPORTANCE OF KNOWING THE RULES & A FEW POINTS FROM THE CASES

October 20, 2014 · by gexall · in Civil Procedure, Expert evidence, Members Content, Relief from sanctions, Statements of Case, Written advocacy

The earlier post on Redstone Mortgages Ltd -v- B Legal Ltd[2014]EWHC 3390 (Ch)contained some important observations from the judge on the steps to be taken if a party wishes to challenge the authenticity of a document. Here we look at this…

FAILING TO TURN UP TO HEARINGS AND SERVING WITNESS STATEMENTS LATE: AN EXAMPLE OF THE DISCRETION BEING EXERCISED: RELIEF GRANTED UPON CONDITION THAT DEFAULTING PARTY PAYS COSTS AND PAYS £25,000 INTO COURT

October 16, 2014 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Costs, Members Content, Relief from sanctions

The question of relief from sanctions after witness statements were served late has been discussed several times on this blog.  The issue was considered by HH Judge Mackie QC  in Carlton Advisers -v- Dorchester Holdings Ltd [2014] EWHC 3341 (Comm)….

PUTTING "WITHOUT PREJUDICE" ON LETTERS DOES NOT NECESSARILY MAKE THEM PRIVILEGED: AVONWICK -v- WEBINVEST CONSIDERED

October 13, 2014 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Disclosure, Members Content, Relief from sanctions, Witness statements

Putting “without prejudice” on inter partes correspondence does not mean that the court will not look at them. This issue was considered by Mr Justice David Richards in Avonwick -v-Webinvest [2014] EWHC 3322 (Ch). The case also contains a short…

RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS, VERY LATE SERVICE OF WITNESS STATEMENTS AND DOCUMENTS: A DECISION TODAY

October 13, 2014 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Relief from sanctions, Statements of Case, Witness statements

The judgment of the Hon Mrs Justice Asplin DBE given today in Lictor Anstalt -v- MIR Steel UK Ltd [2014] EWHC 3316 (Ch) contained a consideration of the Denton criteria in relation to late service of witness evidence and documents….

DENTON APPLIES TO APPLICATIONS TO SET ASIDE DEFAULT JUDGMENTS: HOCKLEY -v- NORTH EAST LINCOLNSHIRE CONSIDERED

October 7, 2014 · by gexall · in Appeals, Applications, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Relief from sanctions, Statements of Case

The issue of whether the “Mitchell/Denton/CPR 3.9” criteria apply to applications by a defendant to set aside a default judgment has been discussed several times on this blog. In Hockley -v- North Lincolnshire &  Goole NHS Trust (19th September 2014)…

RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS GRANTED: RESPONDENT'S "OPPORTUNISTIC" BEHAVIOUR CONDEMNED

October 3, 2014 · by gexall · in Appeals, Applications, Costs, Members Content, Relief from sanctions

In Long -v- Value Properties [2014] EWHC 2981 (Ch) Mr Justice Barling roundly condemned the defendants for taking opportunistic points in litigation. The judge overturned a decision by the Master refusing relief from sanctions. THE FACTS This was an application…

"GRABBING THE CASE BY THE SCRUFF OF THE NECK": CASE MANAGEMENT IN THE FAMILY DIVISION

September 30, 2014 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Relief from sanctions

For the second time in two days we are looking at a report from the Family Division, seeking inspiration for civil lawyers. The robust case management decisions by Holman J in Abuchian -v-Maksoud [2014] EWHC 3104(Fam)  are, in part, decisions…

TALK ON SANCTIONS AND HOW TO AVOID THEM: LEEDS 23rd OCTOBER 2014

September 27, 2014 · by gexall · in Civil Procedure, Costs budgeting, Members Content, Relief from sanctions, Useful links

I am taking part in the Costs and Litigation Funding Update organised by Clarion solicitors and K2 Legal Support in Leeds on the 23rd October 2014. I am  talking on “sanctions and how to avoid them” .Other speakers are dealing…

ADDUCING A SECOND EXPERT WITNESS LATE IN THE DAY: THWAYTES -v- SOTHEBYS CONSIDERED

September 18, 2014 · by gexall · in Applications, Disclosure, Expert evidence, Members Content, Relief from sanctions, Statements of Case

There is a brief report on Lawtel today of a decision of Rose J in Thwaytes -v- Sothebys (16/09/2014) where permission was given for the defendant to rely on an additional expert and the application was heard six weeks before…

SERVICE OF THE PARTICULARS OF CLAIM TWO DANGEROUS POINTS TO WATCH

September 11, 2014 · by gexall · in Applications, Members Content, Relief from sanctions, Service of the claim form, Useful links

Most of the cases and commentary in relation to service concentrate upon late service of the claim form.  However it is possible to fall foul of the rules and serve the particulars of claim late even when the claim form…

ANOTHER RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS CASE – ANOTHER CONSERVATIVE MP: RELIEF GRANTED AFTER FAILURE TO SERVE NOTICE OF FUNDING

August 22, 2014 · by gexall · in Civil Procedure, Costs, Members Content, Relief from sanctions

Relief from sanctions was granted to the claimant in Ye0 MP -v- Times Newspapers Ltd [2014] EWHC 2853 (QB). THE ACTION This was a defamation action where the claimant had failed to file notice of funding with the Particulars of…

DENTON APPLIED IN THE TAX & CHANCERY CHAMBER: LEEDS -v- COMMISSIONERS CONSIDERED

August 14, 2014 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Relief from sanctions

One of the places where Mitchell, and subsequently Denton, had a major impact was the specialist tribunals. As we have seen in this blog Mitchell principles were applied with some vigour and the “clarification” by Denton has also had an effect….

FAILURE TO SERVE NOTICE OF AMENDED CFA DETAILS IS NOT A SERIOUS OR SIGNIFICANT BREACH: HIGH COURT DECISION CONSIDERED IN DETAIL

August 13, 2014 · by gexall · in Appeals, Civil Procedure, Costs, Members Content, Relief from sanctions

The High Court decision in Ultimate Products Ltd -v- Wooley [2014] EWHC 2706 (Ch) provides further guidance as to what the courts are likely to consider “serious or significant” breaches. The High Court judge upheld the decision of the Master…

DENTON CONSIDERED IN THE TAX TRIBUNAL: ELDER -v- REVENUE & CUSTOMS

August 3, 2014 · by gexall · in Applications, Members Content, Relief from sanctions

The Denton case was considered by the First Tier Chamber: Tax Tribunal in Elder -v- Revenue & Customs [2014] UKFTT 728 (TC). Consideration of the Denton principles led to relief being granted.  The decision is, obviously, specific to the rules relating to…

DENTON PRINCIPLES AND EXTENDING TIME FOR APPEALING: COURT OF APPEAL OBSERVATIONS

August 2, 2014 · by gexall · in Appeals, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Relief from sanctions

The issue of whether the “Denton” principles applied to applications for permission to appeal out of time were considered briefly by the Court of Appeal in Hart -v- Burbridge [2014] EWCA Civ 992 THE ISSUES The appellants appealed out of…

DENTON APPLIED: A (VERY) BRIEF REPORT

July 31, 2014 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil Procedure, Disclosure, Members Content, Relief from sanctions

The Denton principles were mentioned, in passing, in the judgment of HHJ Moloney QC In NNN -v- DI [2014] EWHC B14 (QB). The defendant had been in default in serving a list of documents on the claimant.   A peremptory…

LITIGATION AFTER JACKSON (POST DENTON EDITION): 12 POINT SURVIVAL GUIDE

July 26, 2014 · by gexall · in Appeals, Applications, Avoiding negligence claims, Civil Procedure, Costs, Costs budgeting, Members Content, Part 36, Relief from sanctions, Service of the claim form, Serving documents, Useful links, Witness statements

In August last year I wrote Litigation after Jackson a  10 point Survival Guide.  All of the points made in that post remain valid. I have added another 2 to deal with the situation post -Denton. The biggest danger, post…

DENTON APPLIED IN THE TAX TRIBUNAL: NO PERMISSION TO APPEAL THREE YEARS LATE

July 25, 2014 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Relief from sanctions

The Mitchell and Denton cases were reviewed by Judge John Brooks in Meah -v- The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs [2014] UKFTT 708 (TC).  The proposed appellant was three years late.  The refusal of permission to appeal out of…

POST DENTON RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS APPEAL IN THE HIGH COURT: RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS GRANTED: "UNREASONABLE" DEFENDANT ORDERED TO PAY COSTS

July 23, 2014 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Relief from sanctions, Witness statements

I am grateful to Ashley Pratt of St James Chambers for his note of the decision of Mr Justice King in Johnson -v- Bourne Leisure on the 21st July 2014. King J granted relief from sanctions and allowed an appeal from the…

CASE MANAGEMENT AFTER DENTON: DIRECTIONS AND COURT ORDERS SHOULD BE "REALISTIC AND ACHIEVABLE"

July 20, 2014 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil Procedure, Disclosure, Expert evidence, Members Content, Relief from sanctions, Witness statements

Most of the articles about the Denton case focus upon the relief from sanctions and “clarification” of the principles in Mitchell.  However the Court of Appeal made it clear that part of the focus of case management should be to…

DENTON: THE DISSENTING JUDGMENT OF JACKSON L.J. CONSIDERED

July 19, 2014 · by gexall · in Appeals, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Relief from sanctions

In the hundreds of articles, blogs and commentaries on the decision in Denton the “dissenting” judgment is barely mentioned or considered.  Whilst all three members of the court were in agreement that each of the appeals should be allowed there…

WHAT IS MEANT BY "SERIOUS AND SIGNIFICANT"? THE COURT CONCENTRATES MUCH MORE UPON THE EFFECT OF THE BREACH RATHER THAN THE BREACH ITSELF

July 18, 2014 · by gexall · in Appeals, Applications, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Relief from sanctions

In Denton -v- White;  [2014] EWCA Civ 906. the Court of Appeal eschewed the use of the word “trivial” where a court is considering an application for relief from sanctions.  Instead the Court stated that the focus should be on whether…

MITCHELL NOT EXTENDED TO ADMINISTRATIVE LAW: AN ISSUE FOR ANOTHER DAY

July 17, 2014 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Relief from sanctions

In R (Abbas Mohammadi -v- Secretary of State for the Home Department [2014] EWHC 2251 (Admin)the court did not decide the issue of whether “Mitchell” principles applied to applications for judicial review. THE FACTS The applicant was seeking judicial review of…

MORE ABOUT APPEALING MITCHELL DECISIONS OUT OF TIME: RELEVANT CASE LAW

July 13, 2014 · by gexall · in Appeals, Members Content, Relief from sanctions

A post yesterday considered the possibility of appealing, out of time, the unjust orders that may have been made following Mitchell and the subsequent “clarification” in Denton.  There is some law on this topic, ironically it is a result of…

"HISTORIC" SANCTIONS DECISIONS: ARE YOU GOING TO APPLY TO APPEAL OUT OF TIME

July 12, 2014 · by gexall · in Appeals, Applications, Members Content, Relief from sanctions

In Denton -v- White [2014] EWCA Civ 906.   the Court of Appeal stated that we think that the judgment in Mitchell has been misunderstood and is being misapplied by some courts. It is clear that it needs to be clarified and amplified in…

DENTON, RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS AND THE "LITIGATOR'S DILEMMA": LIFE IS NOW DANGEROUS FOR RESPONDENTS

July 9, 2014 · by gexall · in Avoiding negligence claims, Civil Procedure, Costs, Members Content, Relief from sanctions

I have written before about the “litigator’s dilemma” in relation to whether a point should be taken in relation to a breach, or an application for relief of sanctions opposed.  The Denton decision makes this issue far more difficult for…

← Previous 1 … 10 11 12 … 15 Next →

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email. Subscription notifies you of a new post, it does not give you access to members' content.

Join 16.8K other subscribers

Recent Posts

  • CHILD CLAIMANTS AND LOSS OF EARNINGS CLAIMS: WEBINAR 20th APRIL 2026: NOW WITH GREATLY EXPANDED QUESTIONNAIRE
  • AN APPEAL WAS LODGED IN TIME: SOMETIMES THE COURT DOES NOT HELP – BUT HINDER: “I HAVE CONCLUDED THAT THE COURT THWARTED THE LITIGANT’S PROPER AND REASONABLE ATTEMPT TO BRING THE APPEAL IN TIME”
  • THROWBACK FRIDAY: THE DANGERS OF LETTING WITNESSES GIVE “OPINION” EVIDENCE: TWELVE YEARS ON AND THINGS MAY HAVE NOT CHANGED THAT MUCH: APRIL 2014
  • PROVING THINGS 287: CLAIMS FOR FUTURE LOSS OF EARNINGS OF A CHILD: A JUDGMENT FROM YESTERDAY (AND A WEBINAR NEXT MONDAY…)
  • “OVERHEATED LANGUAGE” A “CAVALIER APPROACH” AND “THIN ALLEGATIONS”: WHY IT PAYS TO BE CAREFUL AND DETAILED WHEN MAKING APPLICATIONS TO DISCHARGE INJUNCTIONS

Top Posts

  • AN APPEAL WAS LODGED IN TIME: SOMETIMES THE COURT DOES NOT HELP - BUT HINDER: "I HAVE CONCLUDED THAT THE COURT THWARTED THE LITIGANT'S PROPER AND REASONABLE ATTEMPT TO BRING THE APPEAL IN TIME"
  • THROWBACK FRIDAY: THE DANGERS OF LETTING WITNESSES GIVE "OPINION" EVIDENCE: TWELVE YEARS ON AND THINGS MAY HAVE NOT CHANGED THAT MUCH: APRIL 2014
  • CHILD CLAIMANTS AND LOSS OF EARNINGS CLAIMS: WEBINAR 20th APRIL 2026: NOW WITH GREATLY EXPANDED QUESTIONNAIRE
  • PROVING THINGS 287: CLAIMS FOR FUTURE LOSS OF EARNINGS OF A CHILD: A JUDGMENT FROM YESTERDAY (AND A WEBINAR NEXT MONDAY...)
  • MAZUR MATTERS 61: A COMPARISON OF THE LAW SOCIETY GUIDANCE BEFORE AND AFTER THE COURT OF APPEAL DECISION

Archives

Blogroll

  • Fatal Accident Law
  • Legal Futures
  • Personal injury: Liability and Damages

Books

  • Munkman & Exall on Damages for Personal Injuries and Death 15th ed
  • The APIL Guide to Fatal Accidents 4th edition

Useful Links

  • Buntools (for preparing PDF Bundles)
  • Kings Chambers
  • Kings Chambers Costs & Litigation Funding
  • Kings Chambers Serious Injury
  • The Civil Procedure Rules
  • The Law Society Gazette
  • The National Archives Recently Published Judgments
  • The Senior Court Costs Office Guide 2025
  • www.Bailii.org

Copyright

© Gordon Exall, Exall Legal Training, Civil Litigation Brief, 2013-2026. Unauthorised use and or duplication of the material contained on this blog without permission is strictly prohibited.
Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.

To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
  • Membership Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Advertising Policy
  • Copyright
  • Legal Disclaimer

Copyright © 2026 Civil Litigation Brief

Powered by Big Yellow Workshop