Civil Litigation Brief
Menu
  • Home
  • About
  • Membership Plans
  • Login
Updates and Commentary on Civil Procedure, by Gordon Exall, Barrister, Kings Chambers, Leeds, Manchester & Birmingham. 4-5 Gray's Inn Square, London.
Browse: Home » Remote hearings
HEARINGS WHEN WITNESSES GIVE EVIDENCE FROM ABROAD: SOME  POINTS FOR PRACTITIONERS (AND JUDGES) TO WATCH: "IT WOULD ASSIST THE LOWER COURTS IF FORMAL CLARIFICATION IS GIVEN ADDRESSING THAT TENSION HEAD ON"

HEARINGS WHEN WITNESSES GIVE EVIDENCE FROM ABROAD: SOME POINTS FOR PRACTITIONERS (AND JUDGES) TO WATCH: “IT WOULD ASSIST THE LOWER COURTS IF FORMAL CLARIFICATION IS GIVEN ADDRESSING THAT TENSION HEAD ON”

June 20, 2025 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Remote hearings

There have been a number of cases where litigants have run into difficulties because they  have not complied with the requirements for witnesses who give evidence  remotely from abroad.  We see an example of this case where there a conflict…

THE MAN ON THE CLAPHAM OMNIBUS -  WHICH IS NOT A GOOD PLACE TO BE WHEN GIVING EVIDENCE AT A REMOTE HEARING

THE MAN ON THE CLAPHAM OMNIBUS – WHICH IS NOT A GOOD PLACE TO BE WHEN GIVING EVIDENCE AT A REMOTE HEARING

November 8, 2024 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil evidence, Members Content, Remote hearings

In Raja & Anor v ATM Law & Ors [2024] EWHC 2782 (Ch) the witnesses gave evidence (or attempted to give evidence) from inappropriate places, including a bus.  The judgment of Master Clark shows the need to follow the correct…

PROVING THINGS 234: REMOTE EVIDENCE FROM OUTSIDE THE JURISDICTION: PARTY CALLING WITNESSES HITS A PROBLEM

PROVING THINGS 234: REMOTE EVIDENCE FROM OUTSIDE THE JURISDICTION: PARTY CALLING WITNESSES HITS A PROBLEM

November 2, 2023 · by gexall · in Case Management, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Remote hearings, Witness statements

The judgment of Deputy District Judge Batstone in  Amanda Seafood PTE Ltd v Sykes Seafood Ltd [2023] EW Misc 13 (CC) illustrates the care that needs to be taken when attempting to call a witness who is giving evidence remotely…

WORKING REMOTELY: AVOIDING PROCEDURAL AND OTHER PITFALLS: WEBINAR 16th OCTOBER 2023

WORKING REMOTELY: AVOIDING PROCEDURAL AND OTHER PITFALLS: WEBINAR 16th OCTOBER 2023

October 12, 2023 · by gexall · in Avoiding negligence claims, Members Content, Remote hearings, Webinar, Well being

Working remotely can give rise to additional pressures on litigators, particularly in relation to procedural issues and dealing with problems that occur in litigation and with clients. This webinar looks at the major pitfalls that can occur in personal injury…

COURT REFUSES DEFENDANT'S APPLICATION THAT DEFENDANT'S KENYAN WITNESSES SHOULD APPEAR BY VIDEO LINK:

COURT REFUSES DEFENDANT’S APPLICATION THAT DEFENDANT’S KENYAN WITNESSES SHOULD APPEAR BY VIDEO LINK:

April 12, 2022 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil evidence, Members Content, Remote hearings

In  Jackson v Hayes & Jarvis (Travel) Ltd [2022] EWHC 453 (QB) Mrs Justice Eady refused the defendant’s application that its witnesses give evidence by video link from Kenya. “I am left with, on the one hand, an absence of…

A WITNESS GIVING EVIDENCE WHILST DRIVING A CAR: THEN FROM A CROWDED OFFICE AND THEN WITHOUT MOST OF THE DOCUMENTS AVAILABLE: THIS DOES NOT END WELL

A WITNESS GIVING EVIDENCE WHILST DRIVING A CAR: THEN FROM A CROWDED OFFICE AND THEN WITHOUT MOST OF THE DOCUMENTS AVAILABLE: THIS DOES NOT END WELL

February 24, 2022 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Members Content, Remote hearings

There are passages in the judgment of Recorder Douglas Campbell QC in  ASR Interiors Ltd v AWS Trading Ltd & Anor [2022] EWHC 372 (IPEC) which demonstrate a remarkably “relaxed” attitude to giving evidence in court by one of the…

WITNESSES AND REMOTE HEARINGS: HOW IS IT GOING?  IT IS WORTHWHILE AS LONG AS THE TECHNOLOGY WORKS

WITNESSES AND REMOTE HEARINGS: HOW IS IT GOING? IT IS WORTHWHILE AS LONG AS THE TECHNOLOGY WORKS

December 8, 2021 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Clinical Negligence, Members Content, Remote hearings

I am grateful to John De Bono QC for sending me a copy of the judgment of HHJ Tindal in Freeman -v- Pennine Acute Hospitals NHS Trust, a copy of which is available here. Freeman v Pennine NHS Judgment 03.12.21(without…

THE CONSEQUENCES OF FAILING TO FILE AN ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF SERVICE: NO INJUSTICE WHEN A DEBARRED PARTY ATTENDED A TRIAL BY SKYPE: COURT OF APPEAL DECISION

October 15, 2021 · by gexall · in Appeals, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Default judgment,, Members Content, Remote hearings

In Hirachand v Hirachand & Anor [2021] EWCA Civ 1498 the Court of Appeal rejected an argument that a defendant, who had not filed an acknowledgement of service and had been debarred from taking part in the action, suffered injustice…

TRANSCRIBERS, LIVE RECORDING AND COURT HEARINGS: COURT SENDS OUT  A WARNING: FOLLOW THE RULES AND GET PERMISSION IN ADVANCE

TRANSCRIBERS, LIVE RECORDING AND COURT HEARINGS: COURT SENDS OUT A WARNING: FOLLOW THE RULES AND GET PERMISSION IN ADVANCE

June 24, 2021 · by gexall · in Avoiding negligence claims, Case Management, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Remote hearings

In JR & B Farming Limited v Hewitt [2021] EWHC 1704 (Comm) HH- Davis-White QC (sitting as a High Court judge) issued a clear warning to parties and transcription services that they must follow the correct procedure if a record…

STATEMENT ON THE ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE POST-PANDEMIC: FOUR BARS ISSUE A WARNING

STATEMENT ON THE ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE POST-PANDEMIC: FOUR BARS ISSUE A WARNING

May 21, 2021 · by gexall · in Civil Procedure, Members Content, Remote hearings

In a document issued on the 5th May the Bar Council of England and Wales, the Bar of Ireland, the Bar Council of Northern Ireland and the Faculty of Advocates of Scotland sent out an important message about post-pandemic hearings. …

CLAIMANT NOT SUCCESSFUL IN  APPLICATION THAT A WITNESS ATTEND IN PERSON AND NOT REMOTELY

CLAIMANT NOT SUCCESSFUL IN APPLICATION THAT A WITNESS ATTEND IN PERSON AND NOT REMOTELY

January 14, 2021 · by gexall · in Case Management, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Coronavirus, Members Content, Remote hearings

In Langley v GMB & Ors [2020] EWHC 3619 (QB) Mrs Justice Stacy refused a claimant’s application for an order that a defendant’s witness attend court personally.  The matter could proceed fairly with the witness attending remotely.  This judgment (given…

COVID DOESN'T STOP THE COURTS GOING ON: BUT GREAT CARE IS NEEDED

COVID DOESN’T STOP THE COURTS GOING ON: BUT GREAT CARE IS NEEDED

January 12, 2021 · by gexall · in Adjournments, Applications, Civil Procedure, Coronavirus, Members Content, Remote hearings

In Bilta (UK) Ltd & Ors v SVS Securities Plc & Ors [2021] EWHC 36 (Ch) Mr Justice Marcus Smith examined in detail the principles relating to court hearings during COVID.  There is an examination of the steps that need…

IT IS UNLAWFUL TO TAKE PHOTOGRAPHS OF A TRIAL CONDUCTED REMOTELY

IT IS UNLAWFUL TO TAKE PHOTOGRAPHS OF A TRIAL CONDUCTED REMOTELY

January 6, 2021 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil evidence, Conduct, Coronavirus, Members Content, Remote hearings

In SLF Associates Inc v (1) HSBC (UK) Bank Plc & Ors [2021] EWHC 5 (Ch) Master Kaye pointed out that taking photographs of participants in a remote  court was unlawful. THE CASE The Master was giving judgment in a…

REVIEW OF CIVIL PROCEDURE IN 2020 2: BEST WRITING ON CIVIL PROCEDURE DURING THE YEAR: TWO WISE KINGS

REVIEW OF CIVIL PROCEDURE IN 2020 2: BEST WRITING ON CIVIL PROCEDURE DURING THE YEAR: TWO WISE KINGS

December 24, 2020 · by gexall · in Charity, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Remote hearings

This year saw a explosion of legal writing as everyone had to get to grips with the procedural mayhem that resulted in lockdown.  This is an appropriate time to pay tribute to all those who wrote. Some  of the best…

MORE GUIDANCE FROM JUDGES ON PREPARATION AND ADVOCACY IN REMOTE HEARINGS: "WEAR PANTS, SEQUESTER PETS"

MORE GUIDANCE FROM JUDGES ON PREPARATION AND ADVOCACY IN REMOTE HEARINGS: “WEAR PANTS, SEQUESTER PETS”

December 8, 2020 · by gexall · in Advocacy, Coronavirus, Members Content, Remote hearings

I started the day with a look at guidance for remote hearings.  As is often the way more useful guidance came out this morning in Bloomberg Law “Wear Pants, Sequester Pets: Five Tips From Judges for Zoom Court”. THE GUIDANCE…

REMOTE HEARINGS AND REMOTE ADVOCACY: USEFUL LINKS FROM THE UK AND BEYOND...

REMOTE HEARINGS AND REMOTE ADVOCACY: USEFUL LINKS FROM THE UK AND BEYOND…

December 8, 2020 · by gexall · in Advocacy, Coronavirus, Members Content, Remote hearings, Written advocacy

Lawyers all over the world are getting to grips with advocacy via a computer screen.  This is an opportune time to look at the useful guidance out their for those undertaking and preparing hearings and trials that are heard remotely….

ELECTRONIC BUNDLES AND PROBLEMS AT TRIAL: IF PAGES ARE ADDED IT IS NOT PLAIN SAILING

ELECTRONIC BUNDLES AND PROBLEMS AT TRIAL: IF PAGES ARE ADDED IT IS NOT PLAIN SAILING

December 4, 2020 · by gexall · in Bundles, Case Management, Members Content, Remote hearings

Readers have been waiting, with anticipation, for cases about electronic bundles.   The judgment of HHJ Pearce in Global Technologies Racing Ltd v 5 West (t/a Alex Thomson Racing) [2020] EWHC 3334 (Comm) shows the problems that can occur in relation…

REMOTE  HEARINGS: TRIAL CAN GO AHEAD WITH PARTICIPANTS FROM ABROAD ALLOWED TO WATCH (SUBJECT TO SAFEGUARDS)

REMOTE HEARINGS: TRIAL CAN GO AHEAD WITH PARTICIPANTS FROM ABROAD ALLOWED TO WATCH (SUBJECT TO SAFEGUARDS)

November 17, 2020 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil evidence, Coronavirus, Members Content, Remote hearings

In the judgment this morning in Huber & Anor v X-Yachts (GB) Ltd & Anor [2020] EWHC 3082 (TCC) Mr Justice Kerr rejected an argument that participants in a civil trial could not continue to watch the trial if they…

A REMOTE HEARING IS NOT INNATELY UNFAIR: NOR DOES IT CREATE AN INEQUALITY OF ARMS

A REMOTE HEARING IS NOT INNATELY UNFAIR: NOR DOES IT CREATE AN INEQUALITY OF ARMS

November 13, 2020 · by gexall · in Coronavirus, Members Content, Remote hearings

In Attorney General of the Turks and Caicos Islands v Misick & Ors [2020] UKPC 30 the Privy Council rejected an argument that continuing a criminal trial by remote means would be innately unfair. ” It cannot be said that…

YOU CAN TEACH AN OLD JUDGE NEW TRICKS: TECHNOLOGY "EMBRACE IT: IT WILL MAKE YOUR JOB EASIER"

YOU CAN TEACH AN OLD JUDGE NEW TRICKS: TECHNOLOGY “EMBRACE IT: IT WILL MAKE YOUR JOB EASIER”

November 12, 2020 · by gexall · in Bundles, Case Management, Coronavirus, Members Content, Remote hearings

In S (Fact-Finding) [2020] EWFC 71 HHJ Jack sitting as a High Court Judge heard a case remotely.  I will leave the analysis of his robust findings in the case – where the children were returned to their parents – …

WORKING FROM HOME IN A LONELY WINTER (1): DECOMPRESSION - WINDING DOWN AFTER WORK FINISHES

WORKING FROM HOME IN A LONELY WINTER (1): DECOMPRESSION – WINDING DOWN AFTER WORK FINISHES

November 3, 2020 · by gexall · in Coronavirus, Members Content, Remote hearings, Well being

There are many posts on this blog about  issues relating to working from home. In the early stage of the “first” lockdown many practitioners kindly contributed to a series of posts about the practicalities of  home working, a new experience…

WHEN A LITIGANT DOES NOT HAVE A COMPUTER AT COURT: WHAT IS THE PRACTICAL RESPONSE?

WHEN A LITIGANT DOES NOT HAVE A COMPUTER AT COURT: WHAT IS THE PRACTICAL RESPONSE?

October 16, 2020 · by gexall · in Access to justice, Coronavirus, Members Content, Remote hearings

In  BM Electrical Solutions Ltd & Anor v Belcher [2020] EWHC 2749 (Ch) a very practical problem occurred. The court held a “hybrid” hearing, a litigant appeared in person.  The litigant in person did not have a laptop with them….

10 TIPS FOR LAWYERS WORKING FROM HOME: IN THIS EXPERIENCE YOU ARE NEVER ALONE

10 TIPS FOR LAWYERS WORKING FROM HOME: IN THIS EXPERIENCE YOU ARE NEVER ALONE

October 15, 2020 · by gexall · in Coronavirus, Members Content, Remote hearings

A lot of people  had to get used to working from home very quickly.   During the “early days” a lot of help was gathered from Twitter. Here are 10 points selected  from a series of posts on this blog :…

WITNESSES AT SEA: EVIDENCE FROM THE HIGH SEAS

WITNESSES AT SEA: EVIDENCE FROM THE HIGH SEAS

October 5, 2020 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Members Content, Remote hearings

The judgment of Mr Justice Teare (sitting with two assessors) in  Sakizaya Kalon, Owners of The Vessel v Panamax Alexander, Owners of The Vessel [2020] EWHC 2604 (Admlty) shows some real advantages of being able to take witness evidence remotely. …

ONLINE COURTS DURING THE PANDEMIC:  RESEARCH AND QUESTIONS:  LESSONS FROM TEXAS

ONLINE COURTS DURING THE PANDEMIC: RESEARCH AND QUESTIONS: LESSONS FROM TEXAS

September 28, 2020 · by gexall · in Access to justice, Coronavirus, Members Content, Remote hearings

The problems of keeping the courts going during a pandemic are universal and worldwide. Countries throughout the globe  are getting to grips with the problems caused by remote hearings.  Professor Elizabeth Thornburg  from the Southern Methodist University has written a…

PROTOCOL FOR INSOLVENCY AND COMPANY WORK AT CENTRAL LONDON COUNTY COURT: APPLICABLE FROM TODAY

PROTOCOL FOR INSOLVENCY AND COMPANY WORK AT CENTRAL LONDON COUNTY COURT: APPLICABLE FROM TODAY

September 7, 2020 · by gexall · in Civil Procedure, Coronavirus, Members Content, Remote hearings

A Protocol for insolvency and company work at Central London applies from today. It is set out in full below. It sets out details for remote hearings of bulk and other work made necessary by the pandemic. “PROTOCOL FOR INSOLVENCY…

GUIDANCE ON GIVING REMOTE EVIDENCE: ESSENTIAL READING FROM THE ACADEMY OF EXPERTS

GUIDANCE ON GIVING REMOTE EVIDENCE: ESSENTIAL READING FROM THE ACADEMY OF EXPERTS

September 3, 2020 · by gexall · in Applications, Coronavirus, Expert evidence, Experts, Members Content, Remote hearings, Useful links

The Academy of Experts have written Guidance on Giving Remote Evidence. Although this is aimed at expert witnesses there is much that anyone involved in litigation can take away from this.   SELECTED EXTRACTS There is much that is useful. …

PROVING PROPENSITY AND SIMILAR FACT EVIDENCE IN CIVIL CASES: COURT OF APPEAL JUDGMENT TODAY

August 18, 2020 · by gexall · in Appeals, Civil evidence, Members Content, Remote hearings

In the judgment today in R v P (Children: Similar Fact Evidence) [2020] EWCA Civ 1088 the Court of Appeal set out the principles relating to similar fact evidence in civil and family cases.   The case is also an example…

REMOTE HEARINGS: ZOOM PLATFORM USED, AND WORKED: ALSO AN ENTRY FOR THE OPENING LINE OF JUDGMENT CONTEST: "FAMILY LAW CRAVES FINALITY"

REMOTE HEARINGS: ZOOM PLATFORM USED, AND WORKED: ALSO AN ENTRY FOR THE OPENING LINE OF JUDGMENT CONTEST: “FAMILY LAW CRAVES FINALITY”

August 17, 2020 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil Procedure, Coronavirus, Members Content, Remote hearings

In LB v DB [2020] EWFC B34 (OJ) Deputy District Judge Hodson expressed his dissatisfaction with telephone hearings, but found that a zoom hearing worked.  This has not been a platform viewed with favour by the court authorities, yet appears…

COURTESY AND CORRESPONDENCE: "NOTHING WAS SAID TO ACKNOWLEDGE OR ACCEPT THE JUDGE'S CRITICISM OF THE HIGH-HANDED MANNER IN WHICH THE ASSOCIATE SOLICITOR HAD SOUGHT TO TELL THE COURT HOW THE TRIAL WAS GOING TO BE CONDUCTED"

COURTESY AND CORRESPONDENCE: “NOTHING WAS SAID TO ACKNOWLEDGE OR ACCEPT THE JUDGE’S CRITICISM OF THE HIGH-HANDED MANNER IN WHICH THE ASSOCIATE SOLICITOR HAD SOUGHT TO TELL THE COURT HOW THE TRIAL WAS GOING TO BE CONDUCTED”

August 7, 2020 · by gexall · in Applications, Conduct, Members Content, Remote hearings

The post yesterday on the decision in  Gubarev & Anor v Orbis Business Intelligence Ltd & Anor [2020] EWHC 2167 (QB) mentioned the issue that the Divisional Court had with the way in which the claimant’s solicitors had attempted to dictate…

CIVIL PROCEDURE (CORONAVIRUS): BLOG AND ARTICLES ROUND UP - JULY 2020

CIVIL PROCEDURE (CORONAVIRUS): BLOG AND ARTICLES ROUND UP – JULY 2020

August 7, 2020 · by gexall · in Coronavirus, Members Content, Remote hearings, Useful links

Issues relating to coronavirus still play a large part in the conduct of civil litigation. It is still worthwhile looking at those posts and articles that deal specifically with covid and the courts.   Costs ACL – Gordon-Saker: Video and phone…

REMOTE HEARINGS THE SOLICITOR'S DUTIES: (1) READ THE ORDERS MADE; (2)  DO NOT BE IN CONTEMPT OF COURT

REMOTE HEARINGS THE SOLICITOR’S DUTIES: (1) READ THE ORDERS MADE; (2) DO NOT BE IN CONTEMPT OF COURT

August 6, 2020 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Conduct, Coronavirus, Members Content, Remote hearings

In the judgment today in Gubarev & Anor v Orbis Business Intelligence Ltd & Anor [2020] EWHC 2167 (QB) the Divisional Court sent out a clear message that lawyers must follow orders of the court.  Live trials cannot be transmitted…

REMOTE HEARINGS: THE PLACE WHERE WITNESSES GIVE EVIDENCE FROM MUST BE APPROVED IN ADVANCE BY THE COURT

REMOTE HEARINGS: THE PLACE WHERE WITNESSES GIVE EVIDENCE FROM MUST BE APPROVED IN ADVANCE BY THE COURT

July 17, 2020 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil evidence, Coronavirus, Members Content, Remote hearings

We looked earlier at the judgment in Navigator Equities Ltd & Anor v Deripaska [2020] EWHC 1798 (Comm) in relation to committal proceedings. That judgment also has some important guidance about the way in which remote hearings are conducted and where…

CORONAVIRUS LAW: SHOULD A HEARING BE IN PERSON OR BY VIDEO?

CORONAVIRUS LAW: SHOULD A HEARING BE IN PERSON OR BY VIDEO?

June 25, 2020 · by gexall · in Applications, Coronavirus, Members Content, Remote hearings

In Surrey Heath Borough Council v Robb & Ors [2020] EWHC 1650 (QB) Mr Justice Freedman  considered submissions that a hearing should take place in person. He held that there was an onus on part requesting a hearing in court…

CLINICAL NEGLIGENCE TRIAL HELD REMOTELY: AND IT WORKED WELL...

CLINICAL NEGLIGENCE TRIAL HELD REMOTELY: AND IT WORKED WELL…

June 22, 2020 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Clinical Negligence, Coronavirus, Members Content, Remote hearings

I have highlighted some cases where remote hearings have had difficulties. In Jones v Ministry of Defence [2020] EWHC 1603 (QB) the judgment indicates that the remote hearing in a clinical negligence case worked well. THE CASE The case was…

WHEN REMOTE HEARINGS GO WRONG: AND STRUGGLING THROUGH TO PUT THEM RIGHT - AT WHOSE COSTS?

WHEN REMOTE HEARINGS GO WRONG: AND STRUGGLING THROUGH TO PUT THEM RIGHT – AT WHOSE COSTS?

June 17, 2020 · by gexall · in Arbitration,, Case Management, Civil Procedure, Coronavirus, Members Content, Remote hearings

I often listen to, and read, official statements about remote hearings with a degree of scepticism.   The impression is given that things are going smoothly. The reality is that things are often going awry and it is taking a great…

TRANSPARENCY PROJECT: REMOTE COURT HEARINGS GUIDANCE NOTE

TRANSPARENCY PROJECT: REMOTE COURT HEARINGS GUIDANCE NOTE

June 10, 2020 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Coronavirus, Members Content, Remote hearings

The Transparency Project have produced a Remote Court Hearings Guidance Note.  This is aimed at litigants themselves. Although it is quite specifically aimed at the Family Courts many litigants (and some lawyers) may find this of some assistance.   THE…

CIVIL UPDATE FOR NORTH AND WEST YORKSHIRE: UPDATED GUIDANCE FROM THE DESIGNATED CIVIL JUDGE

CIVIL UPDATE FOR NORTH AND WEST YORKSHIRE: UPDATED GUIDANCE FROM THE DESIGNATED CIVIL JUDGE

May 22, 2020 · by gexall · in Access to justice, Civil Procedure, Coronavirus, Members Content, Remote hearings

HHJ Gosnell has issued new guidance for civil courts in North and West Yorkshire. It is reproduced in full below.   “Introduction The purpose of this document is to update you on events since my last update on 6th April…

AN ELECTRONIC BUNDLE SHOULD BE CONFINED TO "ESSENTIAL" DOCUMENTS: IT HELPS IF COUNSEL HAS A SAY IN ITS PREPARATION: IMPORTANCE GUIDANCE FROM THE HIGH COURT

AN ELECTRONIC BUNDLE SHOULD BE CONFINED TO “ESSENTIAL” DOCUMENTS: IT HELPS IF COUNSEL HAS A SAY IN ITS PREPARATION: IMPORTANCE GUIDANCE FROM THE HIGH COURT

May 11, 2020 · by gexall · in Bundles, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Remote hearings

In the judgment given this morning in  Tailby , Re TPS Investments (UK) Ltd [2020] EWHC 1135 (Ch) HHJ Cox QC (sitting as a High Court Judge) gave some importance guidance in relation to the preparation and presentation of an…

REMOTE HEARINGS IN FAMILY CASES: A STUDY WORTH READING (BUT PERHAPS NOT ON THE SCREEN...)

REMOTE HEARINGS IN FAMILY CASES: A STUDY WORTH READING (BUT PERHAPS NOT ON THE SCREEN…)

May 6, 2020 · by gexall · in Members Content, Remote hearings, Useful links, Well being

In a remarkably quick amount of time the Nuffield Family Justice Observatory has produced a “rapid consultation” Remote hearings in the family justice system. It is available on a link here. The report is worth reading in full. One point…

APPLICATION TO ADJOURN REMOTE HEARING REFUSED: "Some people are much better at lying than others and that will be no different whether they do so remotely or in court"

APPLICATION TO ADJOURN REMOTE HEARING REFUSED: “Some people are much better at lying than others and that will be no different whether they do so remotely or in court”

May 5, 2020 · by gexall · in Access to justice, Applications, Coronavirus, Members Content, Remote hearings

In the judgment given this morning in A Local Authority v Mother [2020] EWHC 1086 (Fam)  Mrs Justice Lieven considered the recent guidance on remote hearings and refused to adjourn an ongoing hearing. “We have had five days of evidence…

ARTICLE IN THE BARRISTER MAGAZINE:  "THE BAR IN A TIME OF CRISIS: A RESPONSE WE CAN BE PROUD OF"

ARTICLE IN THE BARRISTER MAGAZINE: “THE BAR IN A TIME OF CRISIS: A RESPONSE WE CAN BE PROUD OF”

May 2, 2020 · by gexall · in Access to justice, Coronavirus, Members Content, Remote hearings, Useful links

I have  written an article in The Barrister magazine available here.    It deals with the many remarkable responses individual chambers made to the COVID-19 crisis, providing a wealth of online material and resources WHY I HESITATED I explain the…

CIVIL PROCEDURE (CORONAVIRUS): BLOG AND ARTICLES ROUND UP - APRIL 2020

CIVIL PROCEDURE (CORONAVIRUS): BLOG AND ARTICLES ROUND UP – APRIL 2020

May 1, 2020 · by gexall · in Civil Procedure, Coronavirus, Members Content, Remote hearings, Useful links

We may not have been getting out much this month but there has been plenty of material on civil procedure, the courts and coronavirus. Courts Herbert Smith Freehills Courts relax rules on agreeing extensions to procedural deadlines in light of COVID-19…

MORE ON REMOTE HEARINGS: THE DANGERS OF INJUSTICE: COURT OF APPEAL DECISION (IT MAY BE DIFFICULT TO DO JUSTICE OVER THE TELEPHONE IN THE COURSE OF A OVER-BUSY LIST)

MORE ON REMOTE HEARINGS: THE DANGERS OF INJUSTICE: COURT OF APPEAL DECISION (IT MAY BE DIFFICULT TO DO JUSTICE OVER THE TELEPHONE IN THE COURSE OF A OVER-BUSY LIST)

April 30, 2020 · by gexall · in Coronavirus, Members Content, Remote hearings

In  B (Children)(Remote Hearing: Interim Care Order) [2020] EWCA Civ 584 the Court of Appeal set out some of the dangers of remote hearings and the need to take considerable care when important decisions are being made. It is also…

REMOTE HEARINGS: CHILDREN CASES: GUIDANCE FROM THE COURT OF APPEAL

REMOTE HEARINGS: CHILDREN CASES: GUIDANCE FROM THE COURT OF APPEAL

April 30, 2020 · by gexall · in Appeals, Case Management, Coronavirus, Members Content, Remote hearings

Civil litigators may well be able to gain some assistance from the guidance being given in children cases. The Court of Appeal gave judgment today in Re A (Children) (Remote Hearing: Care and Placement Orders). a-children-judgment-300420 [2020] EWCA Civ 583…

PERSONAL INJURY LITIGATORS AND THE CORONAVIRUS (LIVE WEBINAR): 13th MAY 2020

PERSONAL INJURY LITIGATORS AND THE CORONAVIRUS (LIVE WEBINAR): 13th MAY 2020

April 27, 2020 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Coronavirus, Members Content, Remote hearings

On the 13th May I am giving a webinar looking at the practical implications for personal injury litigators of coronavirus and social isolation.  This looks at the rule changes, relevant legislation, case law and guidance in relation to coronavirus. It…

The Virtual Workspace: 50 Tips for Effective Video Conferencing: BOOK REVIEW - "BUY" IT QUICKLY...

The Virtual Workspace: 50 Tips for Effective Video Conferencing: BOOK REVIEW – “BUY” IT QUICKLY…

April 27, 2020 · by gexall · in Charity, Civil Procedure, Coronavirus, Members Content, Remote hearings

Andrew King’s book is a testament to the speed at which it is possible for lawyers to act. Just over a fortnight ago Andrew wrote a thread on Twitter setting out his experience of being involved in a virtual trial,…

GUIDANCE FOR THE CONDUCT OF REMOTE COSTS HEARINGS: READ ALL ABOUT IT

GUIDANCE FOR THE CONDUCT OF REMOTE COSTS HEARINGS: READ ALL ABOUT IT

April 23, 2020 · by gexall · in Assessment of Costs, Coronavirus, Costs, Members Content, Remote hearings

The Association of Cost Lawyers has a link on its site to agreed guidance for the Guidance of Remote Hearings. This is designed to ensure that assessments can continue remotely during social isolation.  Litigation Futures has a useful summary of…

REMOTE HEARINGS: ARE THERE "TWO NATIONS" OPERATING WITHIN THE COURT SYSTEM (OR MORE THAN THAT...)

REMOTE HEARINGS: ARE THERE “TWO NATIONS” OPERATING WITHIN THE COURT SYSTEM (OR MORE THAN THAT…)

April 22, 2020 · by gexall · in Coronavirus, Members Content, Remote hearings

The ability of the courts to proceed using remote hearings has to be celebrated. Sometimes, however, it is interesting to contrast the very real technical difficulties being experienced by county courts up and down the country with what appears to…

THE INNS OF COURT COLLEGE OF ADVOCACY: PRINCIPLES FOR REMOTE ADVOCACY

THE INNS OF COURT COLLEGE OF ADVOCACY: PRINCIPLES FOR REMOTE ADVOCACY

April 16, 2020 · by gexall · in Case Management, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Remote hearings, Useful links, Written advocacy

In an extremely short amount of time the Inns of Court College of Advocacy has produced a remarkable guide “Principles for Remote Advocacy”. The document has entered the public domain today, with no restrictions on its use, it is available…

1 2 Next →

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email. Subscription notifies you of a new post, it does not give you access to members' content.

Join 35.2K other subscribers

Recent Posts

  • MAZUR RECORDING – NOW AVAILABLE
  • MAZUR MATTERS 10: THE STATUTORY DEFENCE TO THE CRIMINAL OFFENCE: WHY YOU (PROBABLY) WON’T GO TO JAIL: BUT THE POSITION GOING FORWARD MAY BE DIFFERENT…
  • THE JUDGE WAS RIGHT TO ALLOW A WASTED COSTS APPLICATION AGAINST THE CLAIMANT’S SOLICITORS TO PROCEED TO STAGE 2: MUCH TO THINK ABOUT HERE FOR CLINICAL NEGLIGENCE LAWYERS (AND INDEED ANYONE WHO DRAFTS PLEADINGS)
  • MAZUR MATTERS 9: WHAT IS MEANT BY THE “CONDUCT OF LITIGATION”? (2): AN EARLY COURT OF APPEAL DECISION WHICH HELPS
  • PART 36: SHOULD THE COURT EXERCISE ITS DISCRETION SO THAT THE NORMAL PART 36 PROVISIONS DO NOT APPLY? THE HIGH COURT CONSIDERS THE “FORMIDABLE OBSTACLE”…

Top Posts

  • MAZUR MATTERS 10: THE STATUTORY DEFENCE TO THE CRIMINAL OFFENCE: WHY YOU (PROBABLY) WON'T GO TO JAIL: BUT THE POSITION GOING FORWARD MAY BE DIFFERENT...
  • MAZUR MATTERS 9: WHAT IS MEANT BY THE "CONDUCT OF LITIGATION"? (2): AN EARLY COURT OF APPEAL DECISION WHICH HELPS
  • MAZUR RECORDING - NOW AVAILABLE
  • MAZUR MATTERS 8: WHAT IS MEANT BY THE "CONDUCT OF LITIGATION" (1): HOW HELPFUL ARE THE REGULATORS?
  • THE JUDGE WAS RIGHT TO ALLOW A WASTED COSTS APPLICATION AGAINST THE CLAIMANT'S SOLICITORS TO PROCEED TO STAGE 2: MUCH TO THINK ABOUT HERE FOR CLINICAL NEGLIGENCE LAWYERS (AND INDEED ANYONE WHO DRAFTS PLEADINGS)

Archives

Blogroll

  • Coronavirus: Guidance for lawyers and businesses
  • Fatal Accident Law
  • Personal injury: Liability and Damages

Books

  • Munkman & Exall on Damages for Personal Injuries and Death 15th ed
  • The APIL Guide to Fatal Accidents 4th edition

Useful Links

  • Buntools (for preparing PDF Bundles)
  • Kings Chambers
  • Kings Chambers Costs & Litigation Funding
  • Kings Chambers Serious Injury
  • The Civil Procedure Rules
  • The National Archives Recently Published Judgments
  • The Senior Court Costs Office Guide 2023
  • Website of 4 – 5 Gray's Inn Square
  • www.Bailii.org

Copyright

© Gordon Exall, Exall Legal Training, Civil Litigation Brief, 2013-2025. Unauthorised use and or duplication of the material contained on this blog without permission is strictly prohibited.
Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
  • Membership Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Advertising Policy
  • Copyright
  • Legal Disclaimer

Copyright © 2025 Civil Litigation Brief

Powered by Big Yellow Workshop

 

Loading Comments...
 

You must be logged in to post a comment.