Civil Litigation Brief ®
Menu
  • Home
  • About
  • Membership Plans
  • Webinars
  • Login
Updates and Commentary on Civil Procedure, by Gordon Exall, Barrister, Kings Chambers
Browse: Home » Witness statements » Page 22

RECONSTRUCTION AND RECOLLECTION: HONEST WITNESSES GET THINGS WRONG: WHICH WITNESS WILL BE BELIEVED

July 15, 2015 · by gexall · in Avoiding negligence claims, Civil evidence, Members Content, Witness statements

The case of Wright -v- Lewis Silkin LLP [2015] EWHC 1897 (QB) has been widely reported. Some report it as a case where a solicitor’s evidence was not believed. This is grossly unfair. This case is another example of the…

APPEALS ON ISSUES OF FACT: SPECULATION AND "OPINION" EVIDENCE FROM WITNESSES IS TO NO AVAIL

July 9, 2015 · by gexall · in Appeals, Civil evidence, Members Content, Witness statements

In Macleod -v- the Commission of Police for the Metropolis [2015] EWCA Civ 688 the Court of Appeal set out the criteria for appealing findings of fact. Further the case highlights the important distinction between what witnesses saw and what…

JUDGES AND WITNESSES 1: IT WAS A LONG TIME AGO

July 8, 2015 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Members Content, Witness statements

There have been a number of cases recently where the courts have considered, expressly, how they should approach witness evidence.  The first,  Axa -v- Arab Insurance Group [2015] EWHC 1939 (Comm) related to witnesses who had to consider matters after…

MORE ON WITNESS CREDIBILITY: THE DOG THAT OBTAINED A MBA (WITH BETTER GRADES THAN THE WITNESS)

July 5, 2015 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Members Content, Witness statements

The post on the Canadian case of The Hearing Clinic (Niagara Falls)  -v- Ontario 2014 ONAC 5831  attracted a lot of views and a lot of comments.  I am grateful to Chris Rees  for pointing out the judgment of Mr…

ELECTRONIC SIGNATURE OF WITNESS STATEMENTS: IS IT VALID? A FIRST INSTANCE DECISION

July 2, 2015 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Witness statements

The question of whether a witness statement can be signed electronically is often described as an “open” issue. It was considered by District Judge Jenkinson in Fitzpatrick -v- AIG Europe Ltd (Liverpool County Court 1st July 2015*). THE CASE The…

THE PROFOUND LACK OF WISDOM IN SIGNING STATEMENTS OF TRUTH ON BEHALF OF YOUR CLIENT

THE PROFOUND LACK OF WISDOM IN SIGNING STATEMENTS OF TRUTH ON BEHALF OF YOUR CLIENT

July 1, 2015 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Witness statements

The observations of the Administrative Court in MRH Solicitors -v- The County Court sitting at Manchester [2015] EWHC 1795 (Admin) were considered in an earlier post.  However there is one further aspect of the case that justifies examination. A CAVEAT…

HOW THE COURT ASSESSES WITNESSES: NOT A NUMBERS GAME

HOW THE COURT ASSESSES WITNESSES: NOT A NUMBERS GAME

June 30, 2015 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Members Content, Witness statements

In TM -v- St George’s Healthcare NHS Trust [2015] EWHC 1866 (QB) Sir David Eady considered the judicial approach to witnesses and the burden of proof, stressing that the assessment of evidence is not a “numbers game”, THE CASE The…

SIMILAR FACT EVIDENCE IN CIVIL PROCEEDINGS: A REVIEW OF THE CASES

June 28, 2015 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Members Content, Witness statements

In MRH -v- The County Court Sitting at Manchester [2015] EWHC 1795(Admin) considered earlier there was a tantalisingly short reference to similar fact evidence. This was not considered in detail by the Administrative Court, however it does highlight some interesting…

EVIDENCE, COSTS AND THE CREDIBILITY OF WITNESSES: A CANADIAN VIEW

June 24, 2015 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Costs, Members Content, Witness statements

This blog has discussed  issues relating to the judicial approach of  the credibility  of witnesses many times.  Some judges have, shall we say, not been backward in giving their views on the “value” of the evidence of some of the…

IF FINDINGS OF DISHONESTY ARE TO BE MADE THEN WITNESSES HAVE TO BE HEARD

June 24, 2015 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Witness statements

Two cases in two days have shown the difficulties that arise when findings of dishonesty are made by judges without hearing evidence. Here we look at the difficulties that arose when a judge held a trial without hearing evidence and…

IF YOU CAN'T PROVE IT YOU DON'T GET IT: CALLING EVIDENCE AT COURT TO PROVE A LOSS: A WORKING EXAMPLE

June 16, 2015 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Witness statements

A party claiming damages must bring evidence to court to prove the losses it claims.  This is a simple statement. However adducing evidence which actually proves the losses claimed often gives rise to difficulties in all spheres of litigation.  The…

LATE WITNESS STATEMENTS IN JUDICIAL REVIEW PROCEEDINGS: DON'T GO TO COLLEGE – JUST READ THE RULES

June 16, 2015 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Members Content, Relief from sanctions, Witness statements

In R (on the application of the London College of Finance & Accounting) -v- Secretary of State for the Home Department [2015] EWHC 1688 (Admin) Mr Justice Cobb made some important observations in relation to the late service of evidence…

RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS, LATE WITNESS STATEMENTS AND LITIGANTS IN PERSON

June 9, 2015 · by gexall · in Members Content, Relief from sanctions, Witness statements

The judgment of Mr Justice Warren in Chadwick -v- Burling [2015] EWHC 1610 (Ch) highlights some important issues in relation to relief from sanctions in general, and the position of litigants in person in particular. THE CASE The applicant in…

WITNESS EVIDENCE, CLINICAL NEGLIGENCE AND CLINICAL NOTES: A CASE IN POINT

June 6, 2015 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Members Content, Witness statements

The judgment of Mr Justice Jay in FB -v- Rana & Princes Alexandra Hospital NHS Trust [2015] EWHC 1536 contains another interesting consideration of the value of witness evidence and contemporary records in a clinical negligence case.  I was recently…

OVERTURNING FINDINGS OF FACTS AND "INFERENCES" ON APPEAL

June 5, 2015 · by gexall · in Appeals, Civil evidence, Members Content, Witness statements

In Vann -v-Ocidental [2015] EWCA Civ 572 the Court of Appeal overturned a finding that there was no contributory negligence. There is an interesting discussion about appeals on findings of fact and the inferences that the judge draws from those…

ASSESSING THE CREDIBILITY OF A WITNESS: IT IS A MATTER OF COMMUNICATIONS

June 3, 2015 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Members Content, Witness statements

The judgment of HH Judge Brown QC in Mainline Digital Communications Ltd -v- Chaddah [2015] EWHC 1580 (QB) is an important illustration of the manner in which a judge assesses the credibility of a witness. “In my judgment, contemporaneous written…

LATE WITNESS EVIDENCE AND WITNESS CREDIBILITY IN THE INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY & ENTERPRISE COURT: HANDED OVER ON A PLATE?

LATE WITNESS EVIDENCE AND WITNESS CREDIBILITY IN THE INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY & ENTERPRISE COURT: HANDED OVER ON A PLATE?

May 14, 2015 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Witness statements

The Intellectual Property Enterprise Court is likely to be a model of good practice. Basically designed to ensure the SMEs can protect their intellectual property rights without going broke in the process it has a fairly robust approach to procedure…

WITNESS CREDIBILITY AND APPEALS: A COURT OF APPEAL DECISION

May 4, 2015 · by gexall · in Appeals, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Witness statements

In Curran -v- Collins [2015] EWCA Civ 404 the Court of Appeal considered how an appellate court should approach issues of witness credibility.  It is an example of a court dealing with a witness who, the judge finds, has “convinced…

JUDGES MUST "CONTEND WITH THE CHANGING FASHIONS OF APPELLATE COURTS": ANOTHER LATE WITNESS STATEMENT; ANOTHER CASE WHERE RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS REFUSED

April 29, 2015 · by gexall · in Appeals, Applications, Avoiding negligence claims, Bundles, Civil evidence, Members Content, Statements of Case, Witness statements

“This is yet another appeal concerning the proper application of CPR 3.9 as to relief from sanctions.” The opening words of the judgment of Mr Justice Cranston in Fouda -v- The Mayor & Burgesses of the London Borough of Southwark…

ASSESSING THE EVIDENCE ON A SUMMARY JUDGMENT APPLICATION: CRITICAL EXAMINATION OF THE RAW MATERIAL IS NECESSARY

March 17, 2015 · by gexall · in Appeals, Applications, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Witness statements

In Calland -v- Financial Conduct Authority [2015] EWCA Civ 192 the Court of Appeal set out important principles to be considered when the court is considering an application for summary judgment. THE CASE The claimant brought an action under the…

RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS FOLLOWING LATE SERVICE OF WITNESS STATEMENTS: ANOTHER EXAMPLE

March 10, 2015 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Relief from sanctions, Witness statements

In Sloutsker -v- Romanova [2015] EWHC 545 (QB) Warby J granted the claimant relief from sanctions after it failed to serve witness statements in time. THE CASE The claimants brought an action for libel. The defendant applied for orders setting…

THE LADD -v- MARSHALL TEST: WHAT IS MEANT BY "REASONABLE DILIGENCE": A TALE OF COMPUTERS IN COURT

February 26, 2015 · by gexall · in Appeals, Applications, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Witness statements

An appeal court will only consider new evidence on very limited grounds. The test in Ladd -v- Marshall [1954] 1 WLR 1489 is that the applicant can show that the evidence could not with reasonable diligence have been obtained for…

Y0UR OPPONENT'S WITNESS STATEMENT CANNOT BE DISCLOSED UNTIL AFTER IT IS USED AT A HEARING IN PUBLIC: A USEFUL REMINDER

February 26, 2015 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Disclosure, Members Content, Witness statements

The judgment of Mr Justice Warby in Barry -v- Butler [2015] EWHC 447 (QB) contains some important reminders about witness statements. The witness statements received from an opposing party cannot be disclosed generally until they are used at a hearing…

INADEQUATE WITNESS STATEMENTS LEAD TO CASE BEING STRUCK OUT AT TRIAL

February 24, 2015 · by gexall · in Appeals, Applications, Civil evidence, Damages, Disclosure, Members Content, Statements of Case, Witness statements

We have looked at the case of  Devon & Cornwall Autistic Community Trust -v- Cornwall Council before.  In the first report Mr Justice Green refused an application to adjourn a trial date but gave permission to serve witness evidence late….

DECIDING CASES ON PAPER: WOODLANDS, EVIDENCE & DECIDING CASES "ONLINE"

February 24, 2015 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Witness statements, Written advocacy

The decision in Woodland -v- Maxwell looked at in an earlier blog is interesting because it is one of the rare cases where the Court of Appeal carried out a (brief) analysis of the evidence in the case more than…

WHOLLY SUCCESSFUL DEFENDANT RECOVERS ONLY TWO-THIRDS OF COSTS BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO ENGAGE IN ADR

February 19, 2015 · by gexall · in Appeals, Applications, Costs, Mediation & ADR, Members Content, Witness statements

In Christian -v- The Commission of Police for the Metropolis [2015] EWHC 371 (QB) Mr Justice Turner considered the costs applications of a failure to a defendant to engage in mediation. THE CASE The claimant was unsuccessful in an action…

LENGTHY BUNDLES AND INTERIM COSTS: OBSERVATIONS FROM THE TECHNOLOGY & CONSTRUCTION COURT

February 18, 2015 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil Procedure, Costs, Members Content, Witness statements, Written advocacy

The two judgments of Mr Justice Akenhead in the Secretary of State for the Home Environment -v- Raythean Systems Limited [2014] EWHC 4375 (TCC) and [2015] EWHC 311 (TCC) contain some familiar motifs in relation to the size of bundles,…

PROVING MATTERS BY EVIDENCE: A LESSON FROM THE FAMILY COURT

February 17, 2015 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil evidence, Members Content, Witness statements, Written advocacy

It is certain that most lawyers involved in childcare matters will read the decision of Sir James Munby in Darlington Borough Council -v- M [2015] EWFC 11.  However there are points made in that judgment of general relevance to all…

WITHDRAWING FROM ADMISSIONS, MISTAKES AND THE DENTON PRINCIPLES

February 16, 2015 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Witness statements

There is a report on Lawtel of the decision of Judge Bidder QC in Moore -v- Worcestershire Acute Hospitals NHS Trust [12/02/15].* This case demonstrates some of the difficult issues in relation to the law of withdrawing from admissions. THE…

WHO SAYS THAT YOU'LL WIN NOTHING WITH KIDS? THE WITNESS EVIDENCE IN WOODLAND -v- MAXWELL CONSIDERED

February 13, 2015 · by gexall · in Appeals, Applications, Civil evidence, Members Content, Witness statements

The case of Woodland -v- Maxwell [2015] EWHC 273 (QB) is almost a procedural epic. It has involved one trip to the Court of Appeal to allow a withdrawal of admissions and a further trip to the Supreme Court on…

IN A DOG EAT DOG WORLD MAKE SURE YOU GET YOUR WITNESS STATEMENTS RIGHT (OR DON'T LET YOUR WITNESSES RABBIT ON WITHOUT GOOD EVIDENCE)

IN A DOG EAT DOG WORLD MAKE SURE YOU GET YOUR WITNESS STATEMENTS RIGHT (OR DON'T LET YOUR WITNESSES RABBIT ON WITHOUT GOOD EVIDENCE)

February 13, 2015 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Witness statements

The judgment of Mr Justice Arnold in Supreme Petfoods Limited -v- Henry Bell & Co (Grantham) Limited [2015] EWHC 256 (Ch) contains a detailed analysis of the law relating to trade marks. Thanks to technology the judgment contains some vivid…

EXPERT EVIDENCE ABOUT THE VERACITY OF WITNESSES: WELL, IT IS PROBABLY A WASTE OF TIME

February 11, 2015 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Expert evidence, Members Content, Witness statements

In Wigan Council -v- C [2015] EWFC 8 Mr Justice Peter Jackson raised considerable doubts as to whether an expert report on the potential veracity of child witnesses was of much value to a judge. It is a family case…

WITNESS STATEMENTS AND "LITIGATION WISHFUL THINKING"

February 9, 2015 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil evidence, Members Content, Witness statements

It is surprising how many cases turn, in essence, on the judge’s assessment of the credibility of the witnesses.  In assessing the evidence on your own, and the other wise, litigators must be aware of the concept, and dangers, of…

EARLY CONTENDERS FOR WORST PUNS ON CIVIL CASES 2015: YOU JUDGE THE STANDARD

February 4, 2015 · by gexall · in Avoiding negligence claims, Civil Procedure, Costs, Costs budgeting, Members Content, Witness statements, Written advocacy

In the annual review of civil litigation of 2014 there was an easy winner for the case that gave rise to the most, and worst, puns.  There is an early contender for this award in 2015. Since this competition is…

WITNESS CREDIBILITY: WHAT FACTORS DOES THE COURT LOOK AT? ANOTHER EXAMPLE FROM THE MERCANTILE COURT

February 1, 2015 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Witness statements

The case of Excelerate Technology Ltd -v- Cumberbatch [2015] EWHC B1 Mercantile was looked at in an earlier post in relation to the judge’s observations about the costs budget*. It did, however, contain important observations about the way in which judges assess…

THE COURT OF APPEAL CAN RE-OPEN A DECISION TO REFUSE PERMISSION TO APPEAL WHEN IT IS ALLEGED THE JUDGMENT WAS OBTAINED BY FRAUD

February 1, 2015 · by gexall · in Appeals, Applications, Members Content, Uncategorized, Witness statements

In Bishop -v- Chhokar [2015] EWCA Civ 24 the Court of Appeal decided that it had jurisdiction to re-open an order refusing permission to appeal when it was alleged that a judgment was obtained by fraud. THE CASE The respondent…

LATE SERVICE OF WITNESS STATEMENTS AND RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS IN THE HIGH COURT

January 30, 2015 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Relief from sanctions, Witness statements

In Devon & Cornwall Autistic Community Trust -v- Cornwall Council [2015] EWHC 129 (QB) the claimant’s application for the adjournment of the trial date was refused. However the claimant was given permission to serve witness statements late.  Mr Justice Green…

MORE ON ADVERSE INFERENCES FROM ABSENT WITNESSES: A CLINICAL NEGLIGENCE CASE

January 29, 2015 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil evidence, Members Content, Witness statements

In Webb -v- Liverpool Women’s NHS Foundation Trust [2015] EWHC 133 (QB) HH Judge Saffman (sitting as a judge of the High Court) considered the implications of an important witness not called by the defendant in a clinical negligence case….

GET YOUR WITNESS TO CHECK THEIR STATEMENT CAREFULLY: OR ELSE

January 29, 2015 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Witness statements

Many earlier posts have concentrated upon the need for care and accuracy in the drafting of witness statements. A classic example of the problems that can occur is shown in the judgment of Mr Justice Warby in David Halberstam -v-…

ABSENT WITNESSES ARE NOT NECESSARILY DECISIVE: WESTERN TRADING CONSIDERED

January 26, 2015 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Witness statements

Several recent posts have looked at the inferences the court can draw in circumstances where a witness is not called or is silent on key points.  This issue was mentioned  in a judgment today by H H Judge Mackie QC…

INFERENCES TO BE DRAWN FROM SILENCE: THE VIEWS OF THE SUPREME COURT

January 25, 2015 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Witness statements

In the recent case of  Gordon Ramsay -v- Gary Love [2015] EWHC 65 Mr Justice Morgan considered, among other things, the inferences that could properly be drawn from the absence or silence of a witness. He refers to the relevant…

THE RIHANNA CASE AND OPINION EVIDENCE IN WITNESS STATEMENTS: BEEN THERE, DONE THAT GOT THE TEE SHIRT

January 22, 2015 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Witness statements

We should, perhaps, get used to celebrities dominating the law reports. After court fees are increased they will be the only people who will be able to afford litigation in any event.  The case of Robyn Rihanna Fenty -v- Arcadia…

DOCUMENTS, CIVIL EVIDENCE AND WITNESS STATEMENTS: SERVE PROPER NOTICES OR YOU COULD BE ON YOUR BIKE

January 21, 2015 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Witness statements

The judgment of His Honour Allan Gore QC (sitting as a High Court judge) in Edwards -v- London Borough of Sutton [2014] EWHC 4378 QB contains some important observations about documents, Civil Evidence Act notices and witness statements. THE CASE…

GORDON RAMSAY CASE AND WITNESS EVIDENCE: ABSENCE OF KEY WITNESSES DOES NOT LEAD TO TURNING UP OF THE HEAT

January 21, 2015 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil evidence, Members Content, Witness statements

The case of Gordon Ramsay -v- Gary Love [2015] EWHC 65 (Ch) has had much attention in the media, primarily because of the identity of the claimant. However the judge made important observations as to the inferences that can be…

SERVICE OF THE CLAIM FORM: E-MAILING A COPY IS NOT GOOD SERVICE (AND WON'T BE EXCUSED)

January 20, 2015 · by gexall · in Appeals, Applications, Avoiding negligence claims, Members Content, Service of the claim form, Serving documents, Witness statements

Service of the claim form raises its head for the second time in two days. In Dunbar Assets Plc -v- BCP Premier Limited [2014] EWHC 10 (Ch) Mr John Baldwin QC (sitting as a Deputy Judge) overturned an order that…

WITNESS "PREPARATION" IN A CIVIL CONTEXT: HOW DO WE HELP THE UNDERDOG WHILST WORKING ON A SHOESTRING?

January 20, 2015 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Members Content, Useful links, Witness statements

The controversy surrounding the new guidelines by the CPS for the preparation of witnesses in serious cases has led me to consider the rules and principles relating to witness preparation in the context of civil litigation. This is always a…

LATE SERVICE OF WITNESS STATEMENTS: ORAL APPLICATION TO EXTEND TIME GRANTED – BUT ON STRICT TERMS

January 17, 2015 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Witness statements

In Rai -v- Jaskaran Singh Bholowasia Pardes Weekly (UK) Ltd [2014] EWHC 4501 (QB) Mrs Justice Simler granted what was effectively an oral application for relief from sanctions. THE CASE The claimant brought an action for defamation. There was an…

PUTTING "WITHOUT PREJUDICE" ON LETTERS DOES NOT NECESSARILY MAKE THEM PRIVILEGED: AVONWICK -V- WEBINVEST IN THE COURT OF APPEAL

January 15, 2015 · by gexall · in Appeals, Applications, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Disclosure, Members Content, Witness statements

The case of Avonwick -v- Webinvest has been looked at before on this blog. Mr Justice David Richards held that letters asking for time to pay a debt were not covered by privilege just because they were headed “without prejudice”….

RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS AND THE LATE SERVICE OF WITNESS STATEMENTS (AGAIN)

January 14, 2015 · by gexall · in Applications, Avoiding negligence claims, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Relief from sanctions, Witness statements

The issue of serving witness statements late, with relief from sanctions being required, was considered by Mr Justice Warby in Hamdani -v- Khafaf & others [2015] EWHC 38 (QB). It contains some timely warnings. THE CASE The claimants were bringing…

ENTERPRISE, PROPORTIONALITY, WITNESS STATEMENTS AND UNNECESSARY COSTS: OBSERVATIONS FROM THE HIGH COURT

January 13, 2015 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Costs, Members Content, Witness statements

In Enterprise Holdings, Inc -v- Europcar Group UK Ltd [2015] EWHC 17 (Ch) Mr Justice Arnold made some telling remarks which bear on proportionality, witness evidence and costs. THE CASE The dispute related to the use of a “e” logo…

← Previous 1 … 21 22 23 … 25 Next →

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email. Subscription notifies you of a new post, it does not give you access to members' content.

Join 12.4K other subscribers

Recent Posts

  • LIMITATION AND SEXUAL ABUSE CLAIMS: THE LAW CHANGED AFTER EVIDENCE AND SUBMISSIONS BUT BEFORE JUDGMENT: THE AMENDED ACT APPLIES
  • THE DANGERS OF SUING A DISSOLVED COMPANY WHICH HAS BEEN RESTORED TO THE REGISTER: COURT REFUSES TO EXTEND TIME BEYOND THE PERIOD OF DISSOLUTION
  • ACCOMMODATION AND APPLIANCE CLAIMS: THE CASES SINCE SWIFT -v- CARPENTER: WEBINAR 3rd SEPTEMBER 2026
  • EXPERT WATCH 68: THE MISUSE OF AI: “CREATE ME AN EXCEPTIONAL EXPERT WITNESS REPORT”: SHOW HOW MY CLIENT “IS 0% AT FAULT”: THIS WITNESS HAD A FEW PROBLEMS…
  • APPELLANT HAS £2.8 MILLION APPEAL STRUCK OUT: RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS REFUSED: THE DANGERS OF INACTIVITY: “THE SERIOUSNESS OF THE CONSEQUENCES CANNOT DETERMINE THE OUTCOME”

Top Posts

EXPERT WATCH 65 : WHEN THE JUDGES SAY "WE ATTACH VERY LITTLE WEIGHT" TO A REPORT IT IS CLEAR THAT SOMETHING HAS GONE WRONG
EXPERT WATCH 68: THE MISUSE OF AI: "CREATE ME AN EXCEPTIONAL EXPERT WITNESS REPORT": SHOW HOW MY CLIENT "IS 0% AT FAULT": THIS WITNESS HAD A FEW PROBLEMS...
COST BITES 441: NO ORDER FOR COSTS - EVEN THOUGH THE APPLICANT WAS SUCCESSFUL: THERE ARE MANY LESSONS TO LEARN HERE...
THROWBACK FRIDAY: AVOIDING NEGLIGENCE CLAIMS IN LITIGATION AN 8 POINT SURVIVAL GUIDE (AUGUST 2019): AND LOOK AT THE LINKS...
EXPERT WATCH 66: RED FLAGS AND EXPERTS (1) :THE DUTY TO CONSIDER THE RANGE OF OPINIONS: OFTEN "HONOURED IN THE BREACH"; OFTEN FATAL TO A PARTY'S CASE

Archives

Blogroll

  • Fatal Accident Law
  • Legal Futures
  • Personal injury: Liability and Damages

Books

  • Munkman & Exall on Damages for Personal Injuries and Death 15th ed
  • The APIL Guide to Fatal Accidents 4th edition

Useful Links

  • Buntools (for preparing PDF Bundles)
  • Kings Chambers
  • Kings Chambers Costs & Litigation Funding
  • Kings Chambers Serious Injury
  • The Civil Procedure Rules
  • The Law Society Gazette
  • The National Archives Recently Published Judgments
  • The Senior Court Costs Office Guide 2025
  • www.Bailii.org

Copyright

© Gordon Exall, Exall Legal Training, Civil Litigation Brief, 2013-2026. Unauthorised use and or duplication of the material contained on this blog without permission is strictly prohibited.
Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.

To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
  • Membership Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Advertising Policy
  • Copyright
  • Legal Disclaimer

Copyright © 2026 Civil Litigation Brief ®

Powered by Big Yellow Workshop

Loading Comments...

You must be logged in to post a comment.