Civil Litigation Brief ®
Menu
  • Home
  • About
  • Membership Plans
  • Webinars
  • Login

Updates and Commentary on Civil Procedure, by Gordon Exall, Barrister, Kings Chambers

Browse: Page 136

THE ROLE OF THE APPELLATE COURT IN CONSIDERING FINDINGS OF FACT

October 15, 2014 · by gexall · in Appeals, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Witness statements

In Clydesdale Bank -v- Duffy [2014] EWCA Civ 1260 the Court of Appeal set out a clear statement of the limited role of the appeal court in considering appeals in relation to findings of fact by the trial judge. THE…

SETTING ASIDE JUDGMENT, MITCHELL AND DENTON: THE COURT OF APPEAL'S VIEW

October 15, 2014 · by gexall · in Appeals, Applications, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Statements of Case

The question of how far the “Mitchell/Denton” principles apply to applications by defendants to set aside judgments was considered by the Court of Appeal in Regione Piemonte -v- Dexia Credop SpA [2014] EWCA Civ 1298.  It can be seen that these principles…

DRAFTING A SKELETON OR WANT TO SERVE AN ADDITIONAL SKELETON ARGUMENT? THEN YOU HAD BETTER READ THIS

October 15, 2014 · by gexall · in Appeals, Applications, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Written advocacy

We have looked before at judicial complaints about the length and extent of skeleton arguments. Similar grievances can be seen in the judgment of the Court of Appeal earlier this week in Tchenguiz -v- Director of the Serious Fraud Office…

A JUDGE SHOULD RARELY RECUSE THEMSELVES: COURT OF APPEAL DECISION IN OTKRITIE CONSIDERED

October 14, 2014 · by gexall · in Appeals, Applications, Civil Procedure, Members Content

In Otkritie International Investment -v- Mr George Urumov [2014] EWCA Civ 1315 decided today the Court of Appeal reviewed the circumstances in which a judge should recuse themselves for bias. It is clear that this cannot be done lightly. In…

LIES, EVIDENCE, DISCLOSURE AND PROCEDURE : AA -v- LONDON BOROUGH OF SOUTHWARK CONSIDERED

October 14, 2014 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Disclosure, Liability, Members Content, Statements of Case, Witness statements

It is certain that the decision in AA -v- London Borough of Southwark [2014] EWHC 500 QB will receive considerable coverage. It is a remarkable case. There are enormous implications for local authorities. Here we look at the procedural issues in…

THE DUTIES OWED TO THE COURT ON A WITHOUT NOTICE APPLICATION: A VERY HIGH STANDARD

October 14, 2014 · by gexall · in Applications, Avoiding negligence claims, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Witness statements, Written advocacy

In Standard Bank -v- Just Oil LLC [2014] EWHC 2687 (Comm) the Hon Mr Justice Walker considered the duties owed when a party makes an without notice application to the court.  Strong words are said. THE FACTS The claimant had…

PUTTING "WITHOUT PREJUDICE" ON LETTERS DOES NOT NECESSARILY MAKE THEM PRIVILEGED: AVONWICK -v- WEBINVEST CONSIDERED

October 13, 2014 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Disclosure, Members Content, Relief from sanctions, Witness statements

Putting “without prejudice” on inter partes correspondence does not mean that the court will not look at them. This issue was considered by Mr Justice David Richards in Avonwick -v-Webinvest [2014] EWHC 3322 (Ch). The case also contains a short…

RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS, VERY LATE SERVICE OF WITNESS STATEMENTS AND DOCUMENTS: A DECISION TODAY

October 13, 2014 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Relief from sanctions, Statements of Case, Witness statements

The judgment of the Hon Mrs Justice Asplin DBE given today in Lictor Anstalt -v- MIR Steel UK Ltd [2014] EWHC 3316 (Ch) contained a consideration of the Denton criteria in relation to late service of witness evidence and documents….

INTEREST AND COSTS WHEN A CLAIMANT BEATS THEIR OWN PART 36 OFFER: WATCHORN –v- JUPITER CONSIDERED

October 13, 2014 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil Procedure, Costs, Damages, Members Content, Part 36

There have been relatively few cases dealing with the approach of the courts under the new Part 36 provisions when a claimant beats their own Part 36 offer at trial. The judgment of HH Judge Purle QC in Watchorn -v-…

COURT ORDERED MEDIATION: DRAFT PRECEDENTS

October 12, 2014 · by gexall · in Civil Procedure, Costs, Members Content, Useful links

In Bradley -v- Heslin Norris J set out , in strong terms the desirability of a formal order for mediation. Here we look at the precedents available. THE OBSERVATIONS IN BRADLEY  In Bradley -v- Heslin [2014] EWHC 3276 (Ch) “If in…

WRITTEN SUBMISSIONS: STATEMENTS OF ISSUES; PLEADING AND PROOF

October 12, 2014 · by gexall · in Appeals, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Statements of Case, Written advocacy

The decision of Mr Justice Walker in Burrows -v- Northumbrian Walker Ltd [2014] EWHC 3305(QB) considers the need for clarity in written submission and for the issues the judge is asked to determine to be clearly defined. It also considers…

TRIAL PREPARATION, BUNDLES & WITNESS STATEMENTS: THE JUDGE'S LAMENT

October 12, 2014 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Useful links, Witness statements, Written advocacy

The earlier post on the decision in Weathford -v- Hydropath  concentrated upon the application for a non-party costs order.  However in the primary judgment on liability the judge made some all too common criticisms in relation to trial preparation, skeleton…

NON-PARTY COSTS ORDERS: ALL THE LAW IN ONE USEFUL PLACE

October 12, 2014 · by gexall · in Applications, Avoiding negligence claims, Civil Procedure, Costs, Members Content

Making an application for a non-party costs order can be a controversial step in the proceedings. The, principles, law and practice are thoroughly reviewed by Mr Justice Akenhead in Weatherford Global Products Ltd -v- Hydropath Holdings Ltd [2014] EWHC 3243…

ROBUST DECISIONS, CASE MANAGEMENT AND WITNESS EVIDENCE: AVOIDING REVERSE MACROCOSM

October 11, 2014 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Witness statements, Written advocacy

In Tindall Cobham 1 Ltd -v- Adda Hotel  [2014] EWHC 2637 (Ch) Peter Smith J made robust orders to ensure that an application would be heard within days rather than months.  He also made some telling observations in relation to…

CAPS ON DAMAGES AND PART 36: THE INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY ENTERPRISE COURT

October 10, 2014 · by gexall · in Civil Procedure, Costs, Damages, Members Content, Part 36

Some interesting and important points of procedure were considered today by H.H. Judge Hacon in Abbot -v- Design & Display Ltd [2014] EWHC 3243 (IPEC). Firstly in relation to the rules of the Intellectual Property Enterprise Court and the damages…

SOME THINGS MAY BE BETTER MEDIATED THAN LITIGATED: NEIGHBOUR DISPUTES FOR INSTANCE

October 9, 2014 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil Procedure, Costs, Mediation & ADR, Members Content

There are some very important observations in the judgment  of Norris J in the case of Bradley -v- Heslin [2014] EWHC 3276 (Ch) today.  This was given in a  neighbour dispute over access and gates which could have been remedied…

PRE-ACTION DISCLOSURE WAS JUSTIFIED AND REASONABLE: COURT OF APPEAL DECISION

October 9, 2014 · by gexall · in Appeals, Applications, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content

In the judgment today in  Jet Airways (India) Ltd -v- Barloworld Handling Ltd [2014] EWCA Civ 1311 the Court of Appeal reiterated the criteria for pre-action disclosure. The Court upheld a decision ordering pre-action disclosure and were extremely firm in…

VERY, VERY LATE APPLICATION TO AMEND PARTICULARS OF CLAIM ALLOWED

October 8, 2014 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Statements of Case

In MacLeod -v- Mears [2014] EWHC 3140 QB Mr Justice Hamblen allowed the claimant to amend the particulars of claim very late, after a trial in fact.  THE FACTS The claimant brought an action alleging a failure to pay a…

MATERIAL NON-DISCLOSURE ON WITHOUT NOTICE APPLICATIONS: A SALUTARY REMINDER

October 8, 2014 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil Procedure, Members Content

The previous post on the Evans’ case highlights the duty of full and frank disclosure on an ex parte application. In the Evans case it would have been impossible for the claimant to argue material non-disclosure (if indeed there was…

YOU CAN'T GO BEHIND THE OTHER SIDE'S BACK WHEN WITHDRAWING A PART 36 OFFER

October 8, 2014 · by gexall · in Civil Procedure, Members Content, Part 36

Mr Justice Leggatt in a judgment given today described the facts in Evans -v- Royal Wolverhampton Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2014] EWHC 3185 (QB) as “remarkable”. It raised the question of “whether a party who requires the court’s permission to…

DENTON APPLIES TO APPLICATIONS TO SET ASIDE DEFAULT JUDGMENTS: HOCKLEY -v- NORTH EAST LINCOLNSHIRE CONSIDERED

October 7, 2014 · by gexall · in Appeals, Applications, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Relief from sanctions, Statements of Case

The issue of whether the “Mitchell/Denton/CPR 3.9” criteria apply to applications by a defendant to set aside a default judgment has been discussed several times on this blog. In Hockley -v- North Lincolnshire &  Goole NHS Trust (19th September 2014)…

THE CREDIBILITY OF WITNESSES; JOINT MEETINGS AND OVERREACHING EXPERTS: A CASE TO POINT

October 6, 2014 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Witness statements

The judgment of Mr Justice Dingemans in Garcia -v- Associated Newspapers Ltd [2014] EWHC 3137 is a defamation action. It contains some interesting examples of evidential issues and problems. Firstly relating to the assessment of witnesses; secondly in relation to…

SORTING MAJOR PROBLEMS OUT IN THE MIDDLE OF A TRIAL: SCHEDULES AND STATEMENT OF ISSUES SHOULD BE PREPARED IN ADVANCE NOT DURING A TRIAL

October 6, 2014 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil Procedure, Costs, Damages, Disclosure, Members Content, Statements of Case, Written advocacy

The major purpose of case management is to ensure that when a matter reaches trial the parties, and the judge, know precisely what the issues are in Redd Factors  -v- Bombadier Transportation [2014] EWCH 3138 (QB) this process clearly went…

A PARTY UNREASONABLY REFUSES TO MEDIATE BUT RECOVERS ALL ITS COSTS: WHY NORTHGROP GRUMMAN (2) IS ESSENTIAL READING

October 5, 2014 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil Procedure, Costs, Members Content

The question of costs liability following an “unreasonable” failure to mediate remain a developing area of law. This is an area with profound practical implications for litigators and their clients. That is why the decision of Mr Justice Ramsey in…

RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS GRANTED: RESPONDENT'S "OPPORTUNISTIC" BEHAVIOUR CONDEMNED

October 3, 2014 · by gexall · in Appeals, Applications, Costs, Members Content, Relief from sanctions

In Long -v- Value Properties [2014] EWHC 2981 (Ch) Mr Justice Barling roundly condemned the defendants for taking opportunistic points in litigation. The judge overturned a decision by the Master refusing relief from sanctions. THE FACTS This was an application…

CALDERBANK OFFER HAD NO EFFECT ON OUTCOME IN RELATION TO COSTS:

October 2, 2014 · by gexall · in Appeals, Applications, Costs, Damages, Members Content

Some parties make “Calderbank” offers in place of Part 36 offers. The effect of a Calderbank offer and whether it should affect an order for costs was considered by the Court of Appeal today in Coward -v- Phaesetos [2014] EWCA…

PLEADING AND PROVING ALLEGATIONS OF FRAUD OR DISHONESTY: MULLARKE -v- BROAD: USEFUL LINKS AND GUIDANCE

October 2, 2014 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Statements of Case, Written advocacy

Great care needs to be taken in pleading allegations of fraud or dishonesty.  In particular the pleader needs to be sure that there is sufficient evidence to justify the pleading.  This was considered in some detail by Lewison J in…

NO INDEMNITY COSTS: GORGEOUS BEAUTY 2

October 2, 2014 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil Procedure, Costs, Members Content

We looked at the Gorgeous Beauty case earlier in the context of witness evidence. I am grateful to Jon Lord for bringing my attention to the subsequent decision on costs.  The judge declined to order indemnity costs and awarded the…

INVOLUNTARY BAILMENT AND CIVIL PROCEDURE: CAMPBELL -v- REDSTONE CONSIDERED

October 2, 2014 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Damages, Liability, Members Content, Risks of litigation

The law as to bailment sometimes raises its head in civil procedure. It is relevant for instance when someone damages a car which is borrowed. It is more significant in relation to the duties owed in relation to goods left…

MORE ON WITNESS CREDIBILITY: McIntyre & HENNESSY -v- THE HOME OFFICE

October 1, 2014 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Witness statements

We have looked at issues of witness credibility many times before. It is often the key issue when a matter reaches trial. A graphic example of credibility issues can be found in the judgment of Mr Justice Mostyn in McIntyre…

"GRABBING THE CASE BY THE SCRUFF OF THE NECK": CASE MANAGEMENT IN THE FAMILY DIVISION

September 30, 2014 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Relief from sanctions

For the second time in two days we are looking at a report from the Family Division, seeking inspiration for civil lawyers. The robust case management decisions by Holman J in Abuchian -v-Maksoud [2014] EWHC 3104(Fam)  are, in part, decisions…

WITNESS STATEMENTS IN FOREIGN LANGUAGES: THE APPROPRIATE PROCEDURE

September 29, 2014 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Witness statements

If a witness cannot speak English and a witness statement is required what needs to be done? Some guidance can be found in the rules and in a recent case in the Family Division. GUIDANCE IN PRACTICE DIRECTION 32 23.2…

TALK ON SANCTIONS AND HOW TO AVOID THEM: LEEDS 23rd OCTOBER 2014

September 27, 2014 · by gexall · in Civil Procedure, Costs budgeting, Members Content, Relief from sanctions, Useful links

I am taking part in the Costs and Litigation Funding Update organised by Clarion solicitors and K2 Legal Support in Leeds on the 23rd October 2014. I am  talking on “sanctions and how to avoid them” .Other speakers are dealing…

MAKING AN APPLICATION IN THE CHANCERY DIVISION AFTER THE 1ST OCTOBER 2014: NO BUNDLE NO HEARING

September 26, 2014 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Useful links, Written advocacy

The Chancery Division has introduced strict new provisions which apply from 1st October 2014. No bundle no hearing. Here we look at the essential elements of the guidance and application bundles. THE PRACTICE NOTE The Practice Note states: “Old and…

MORE ON CHILD CLAIMANTS AND THE RECOVERY OF SUCCESS FEES: AN EXTREMELY HELPFUL NOTE FROM THE CLAIMANT'S SOLICITORS

September 26, 2014 · by gexall · in Appeals, Applications, Costs, Members Content, Rule Changes

The post yesterday on children and success fees got a lot of attention. I am grateful to Daniel Higgins head of costs at Gavin Edmonson Solicitors Ltd who was involved in that appeal. His note (reproduced with his permission below)…

RULE CHANGES COMING INTO FORCE ON THE 1st OCTOBER 2014

September 26, 2014 · by gexall · in Civil Procedure, Costs, Members Content, Rule Changes

A reminder that rule changes come into force on the 1st October with links to the relevant rules and useful articles and guidance. AN OUTLINE OF THE CHANGES The following summary  is taken from The Justice guide  The changes are,…

SUCCESS FEES IN CHILDREN CASES: LIVERPOOL AND MANCHESTER PRACTICE

September 25, 2014 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil Procedure, Costs, Damages, Members Content

The question of deducting success fees from the damages of a child remains a vexed one. I am grateful to Gillian Shaw from Paul Rooney LLP Solicitors who sent me the following note in relation to the practice in Liverpool…

DRESSING FOR COURT: GUIDANCE AND LINKS FOR LAWYERS, LITIGANTS AND WITNESSES

DRESSING FOR COURT: GUIDANCE AND LINKS FOR LAWYERS, LITIGANTS AND WITNESSES

September 24, 2014 · by gexall · in Advocacy, Members Content, Useful links

There has been a lot of debate recently about appropriate dress for court. I am not going to discuss the reports that gave rise to that. However at least that should lead to a consideration of appropriate dress for court….

COSTS CAPPING IN THE COURT OF APPEAL: DON'T BANK ON THE TIDE BEING IN YOUR FAVOUR

September 24, 2014 · by gexall · in Appeals, Applications, Civil Procedure, Costs, Costs budgeting, Members Content

In Tidal Energy -v- Bank of Scotland Plc Arden L.J. considered, and rejected, an application for costs capping in relation to a forthcoming Court of Appeal hearing. The Court was keen to discourage satellite litigation in the Court of Appeal….

THE WITNESSES SAY THE OTHER SIDE IS LYING: WHAT DOES THE JUDGE DO? A GORGEOUS BEAUTY CONSIDERED!

September 23, 2014 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Witness statements

We have looked before at issues of witness credibility, particularly in relation to the drafting of witness statements. This was an issue considered by Arnold J in Gorgeous Beauty Ltd -v- Liu (and others) [2014] EWHC 2952 (Ch). It provides…

THE JUDGE, THE EXPERT, CAUSATION AND DAMAGES: THE APPROPRIATE APPROACH WHEN THE DEFENDANT HAS MADE A BAD SITUATION WORSE

September 20, 2014 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Damages, Expert evidence, Members Content

The decision of Foskett J in Reaney -v- University Hospital of North Staffordshire NHS Trust [2014] EWHC 2016 (QB) contains important observations on the role of the judge and the expert in assessing damages for care. It also contains a…

THINKING OF ISSUING WITHOUT A LETTER BEFORE ACTION? THINK AGAIN IT MAY BE BAD FOR YOUR HEALTH(CARE)

September 20, 2014 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil Procedure, Costs, Members Content

In Baxter Healthcare UK Ltd -v- Fresenius Kabi* (17/09/14) Judge Hacon set out the dangers of issuing proceedings without sending a letter before action. THE ISSUES The claimant issued proceedings without sending a letter before action. The dispute was resolved….

ADDUCING A SECOND EXPERT WITNESS LATE IN THE DAY: THWAYTES -v- SOTHEBYS CONSIDERED

September 18, 2014 · by gexall · in Applications, Disclosure, Expert evidence, Members Content, Relief from sanctions, Statements of Case

There is a brief report on Lawtel today of a decision of Rose J in Thwaytes -v- Sothebys (16/09/2014) where permission was given for the defendant to rely on an additional expert and the application was heard six weeks before…

INDEMNITY COSTS, COSTS BUDGETING AND WITNESS STATEMENTS:INTERVIEW ON KELLIE -v- LLOYD

September 18, 2014 · by gexall · in Applications, Costs, Costs budgeting, Members Content, Useful links, Witness statements

There is a feature on the Lexis Nexis Dispute Resolution Blog where I answer questions about the implications of the judgment in Kellie and another v Wheatley & Lloyd Architects Ltd [2014] EWHC 2886 (TCC), [2014] All ER (D) 152 (Aug)…

COSTS IN THE SUPREME COURT: NEGLIGENT SOLICITORS ORDERED TO PAY COSTS OF BOTH SIDES

September 18, 2014 · by gexall · in Appeals, Civil Procedure, Costs, Members Content

What costs order should the Supreme Court make when an appellant succeeds in establishing that wills are valid despite the fact that they have been improperly executed because of negligence on the part of a solicitor? A pragmatic view was…

CHANGES TO CHANCERY PROCEDURE FROM 1st OCTOBER

September 17, 2014 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Useful links

Master Marsh has put out two Practice Notes which deal with changes in Chancery Procedure from the 1st October 2014. The first deals with lodging of documents electronically and in hard copy.  Documents will not be able to be filed…

COSTS CLAIMED AS DAMAGES 2: THE CASE LAW IN DETAIL

September 17, 2014 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Costs, Damages, Members Content

I am grateful to P.J.Kirby Q.C. for responding to the previous post on costs claimed as damages.  The situation is far more complex than the passage cited in the Rentokil case suggests. THE ISSUE P.J. asked whether the case of…

WHAT IS THE POSITION WHEN LEGAL COSTS ARE CLAIMED AS A HEAD OF DAMAGES?

September 17, 2014 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Costs, Damages, Expert evidence, Members Content

The case of Rentokil Initial -v- Goodman Derrick LLP [2014] EWHC 2994 (Ch) was looked at in the previous post in relation to evidence.  However it also raised an interesting issue as to the approach a court should take when a…

LITIGATION: EVIDENCE; MITIGATION OF LOSS AND "BLACK BOXES" IN THE EVIDENCE

September 17, 2014 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content

The case of Rentokil Initial -v- Goodman Derrick LLP [2014] EWHC 2994 (Ch) contains some interesting observations on evidence. In particular what is the position when a party claims privilege and fails to disclose legal advice relating to a settlement…

CORONER'S HEARINGS AND THE USE OF HEARSAY EVIDENCE

September 17, 2014 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Members Content

The Chief Coroner has issued a Law Sheet on the use of Hearsay Evidence in Coroner’s Courts.  It is available here THE KEY POINTS Hearsay evidence is admissible in coroner’s courts. Once it is admitted its value is a matter…

← Previous 1 … 135 136 137 … 146 Next →

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email. Subscription notifies you of a new post, it does not give you access to members' content.

Join 12.3K other subscribers

Recent Posts

  • ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND LITIGATION: AN UPDATE ON CONSULTATION FINDINGS FROM THE CIVIL JUSTICE COUNCIL
  • WITNESS EVIDENCE WEDNESDAY 2: A CHECKLIST FOR THOSE CALLED UP TO PREPARE WITNESS STATEMENTS IN A “FAREPAK” TYPE SCENARIO
  • WITNESS EVIDENCE WEDNESDAY: THE CASE WHERE THE GOVERNMENT’S WITNESS EVIDENCE WAS SO BAD THAT IT WITHDREW THE CASE BEFORE THE RESPONDENTS GAVE EVIDENCE: WHY THE PRINCIPLES RELATING TO WITNESS EVIDENCE NEED TO BE UNDERSTOOD
  • WHERE THINGS GO WRONG IN LITIGATION (AND STOPPING IT HAPPENING TO YOU 3): ADVISING A CLIENT THAT IF THEY DISCONTINUE THEN THEY CAN’T COME BACK
  • WHERE THINGS WENT WRONG IN LITIGATION (AND STOPPING IT HAPPENING TO YOU) 2: ADVISING A CLIENT THAT THEY ARE NOT LIABLE FOR COSTS BECAUSE PROCEEDINGS HAVE NOT BEEN SERVED

Top Posts

RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS: AS STRONGLY WORDED A REFUSAL AS I HAVE SEEN: THE CONCEPT "DOES NOT EMBODY A PRINCIPLE OF "BREACH NOW REPENT LATER"
THE ONLINE PROCEDURE (RULES AND PRACTICE DIRECTIONS) RULES 2026 COME INTO FORCE ON THE 7th SEPTEMBER: HERE IS A SUMMARY (AND THE RULES THEMSLVES)
WHERE THINGS WENT WRONG IN LITIGATION (AND STOPPING IT HAPPENING TO YOU) 2: ADVISING A CLIENT THAT THEY ARE NOT LIABLE FOR COSTS BECAUSE PROCEEDINGS HAVE NOT BEEN SERVED
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND LITIGATION: AN UPDATE ON CONSULTATION FINDINGS FROM THE CIVIL JUSTICE COUNCIL
THE CURRENT IMPORTANCE OF PLEADINGS 84 : DEFENCE STRUCK OUT "THE SMALL PARTS OF THE PLEADINGS THAT DO ADDRESS THE CLAIMANT'S CARE ARE LIKE TINY ISLANDS LOST IN A VAST OCEAN OF IRRELEVANCE"

Archives

Blogroll

  • Fatal Accident Law
  • Legal Futures
  • Personal injury: Liability and Damages

Books

  • Munkman & Exall on Damages for Personal Injuries and Death 15th ed
  • The APIL Guide to Fatal Accidents 4th edition

Useful Links

  • Buntools (for preparing PDF Bundles)
  • Kings Chambers
  • Kings Chambers Costs & Litigation Funding
  • Kings Chambers Serious Injury
  • The Civil Procedure Rules
  • The Law Society Gazette
  • The National Archives Recently Published Judgments
  • The Senior Court Costs Office Guide 2025
  • www.Bailii.org

Copyright

© Gordon Exall, Exall Legal Training, Civil Litigation Brief, 2013-2026. Unauthorised use and or duplication of the material contained on this blog without permission is strictly prohibited.
Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.

To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
  • Membership Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Advertising Policy
  • Copyright
  • Legal Disclaimer

Copyright © 2026 Civil Litigation Brief ®

Powered by Big Yellow Workshop

Loading Comments...

You must be logged in to post a comment.