Civil Litigation Brief
Menu
  • Home
  • About
  • Membership Plans
  • Webinars
  • Login

Updates and Commentary on Civil Procedure, by Gordon Exall, Barrister, Kings Chambers

Browse: Page 64
WITNESS STATEMENTS SHOULD "NOT MAKE POINTS WHICH ARE ESSENTIALLY A MATTER FOR LEGAL SUBMISSION OR ARGUMENT": HIGH COURT DECISION

WITNESS STATEMENTS SHOULD “NOT MAKE POINTS WHICH ARE ESSENTIALLY A MATTER FOR LEGAL SUBMISSION OR ARGUMENT”: HIGH COURT DECISION

November 25, 2020 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Members Content, Witness statements

In  Flaxby Park Ltd v Harrogate Borough Council [2020] EWHC 3204 (Admin) Mr Justice Holgate made some telling comments on witness statements.  Statements should not provide a commentary on documents or make points which are essentially legal submissions or argument. …

IF YOU WANT RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS - PUT THE DEFAULT RIGHT AT ONCE, AND  CERTAINLY WELL BEFORE ANY APPLICATION FOR RELIEF: DEFENDANT FAILS ON APPEAL WHEN WITNESS EVIDENCE SERVED LATE

IF YOU WANT RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS – PUT THE DEFAULT RIGHT AT ONCE, AND CERTAINLY WELL BEFORE ANY APPLICATION FOR RELIEF: DEFENDANT FAILS ON APPEAL WHEN WITNESS EVIDENCE SERVED LATE

November 24, 2020 · by gexall · in Avoiding negligence claims, Case Management, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Relief from sanctions, Witness statements

In the many posts I have written about seeking relief from sanctions one matter that has been stressed is the overwhelming importance of rectifying the breach immediately. The dangers of  not doing so are exemplified in the judgment of Mr…

DEALING WITH DIFFICULT OPPONENTS: USEFUL LINKS AND HINTS: "NEVER LOWER YOURSELF, HOWEVER TEMPTING"

DEALING WITH DIFFICULT OPPONENTS: USEFUL LINKS AND HINTS: “NEVER LOWER YOURSELF, HOWEVER TEMPTING”

November 24, 2020 · by gexall · in Avoiding negligence claims, Civil evidence, Members Content, Well being

There was a recent Twitter discussion about the most appropriate means of dealing with “difficult” (meaning most rude) opponents.  This led me to look at the guidance that is available for dealing with these issues in the legal profession. Here…

CORONAVIRUS: LAW AND LAWYERS - RECENT POSTS AND ARTICLES

CORONAVIRUS: LAW AND LAWYERS – RECENT POSTS AND ARTICLES

November 24, 2020 · by gexall · in Coronavirus, Members Content, Useful links

Links to articles and posts on coronavirus and the law. CORONAVIRUS LAW Kings Chambers – KINGS CHAMBERS & SIMPSON MILLAR INSTRUCTED TO CHALLENGE THE GOVERNMENT’S 10PM HOSPITALITY CURFEW PLANNING Lewis Silkin – Overview of planning changes 2020 (England only) LOCAL AUTHORITIES The…

RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS GRANTED WHEN NOTICE TO RELY ON HEARSAY EVIDENCE NOT SERVED AHEAD OF TRIAL

RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS GRANTED WHEN NOTICE TO RELY ON HEARSAY EVIDENCE NOT SERVED AHEAD OF TRIAL

November 23, 2020 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Members Content, Relief from sanctions, Sanctions, Witness statements

In  ST (A Minor) & Anor v L Primary School (Rev 2) [2020] EWHC 1046 (QB) Deputy Master Hill QC granted relief from sanctions where the claimant failed to serve a notice of intention to rely on hearsay evidence prior…

WHAT'S THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN A COMMERCIAL SOLICITOR AND A PROFESSIONAL KICKBOXER? (THERE'S A WHOLE WEBINAR ABOUT THIS...)

WHAT’S THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN A COMMERCIAL SOLICITOR AND A PROFESSIONAL KICKBOXER? (THERE’S A WHOLE WEBINAR ABOUT THIS…)

November 23, 2020 · by gexall · in Damages, Members Content, Personal Injury

What is the difference between a solicitor and a professional kickboxer? There are many answers to this – and I am certain that I am going to receive some interesting responses on social media.  However, whatever the differences are, there…

BULLYING AT WORK: ADVICE FROM THE PROFESSION AND USEFUL LINKS: "NO ONE IS IMMUNE AND NO ONE KNOWS HOW MUCH IT WILL AFFECT THEM UNTIL IT HAPPENS"

BULLYING AT WORK: ADVICE FROM THE PROFESSION AND USEFUL LINKS: “NO ONE IS IMMUNE AND NO ONE KNOWS HOW MUCH IT WILL AFFECT THEM UNTIL IT HAPPENS”

November 20, 2020 · by gexall · in Members Content, Useful links, Well being

This week is Anti-Bullying week. For this, and other, reasons it is a good time to repeat advice about dealing with bullying at work, in the legal profession in particular.  Firstly useful observations from the lawyers on Twitter, secondly reviews…

CONTEMPT OF COURT,  THE STATEMENT OF TRUTH AND THE CRIMINAL STANDARD OF PROOF: HIGH COURT DECISION FINDS CLAIMANTS IN CONTEMPT OF COURT

CONTEMPT OF COURT, THE STATEMENT OF TRUTH AND THE CRIMINAL STANDARD OF PROOF: HIGH COURT DECISION FINDS CLAIMANTS IN CONTEMPT OF COURT

November 20, 2020 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Committal proceedings, Fundamental Dishonesty, Members Content

In Zurich Insurance Plc v Barnicoat & Anor [2020] EWHC 3127 (QB)  David Lock (QC) sitting as a Judge of the High Court considered the difficulties a party seeking an order for contempt of court faces when they do not…

PROVING THINGS 186: WHEN THE ONE WITNESS IN THE CASE HAD LITTLE KNOWLEDGE OF HOW THE FIGURES IN THE SCHEDULE HAD BEEN REACHED - THERE IS TROUBLE AHEAD...

PROVING THINGS 186: WHEN THE ONE WITNESS IN THE CASE HAD LITTLE KNOWLEDGE OF HOW THE FIGURES IN THE SCHEDULE HAD BEEN REACHED – THERE IS TROUBLE AHEAD…

November 20, 2020 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Damages, Members Content, Witness statements

In Crazy Bear Group Ltd v Patel & Anor [2020] EWHC 3023 (Ch) Insolvency and Companies Court Judge Jones (sitting as a Judge of the High Court) considered whether defendants in an action had proven that they had suffered damages…

WEARING FACEMASKS IN THE COURTROOM: A MATTER OF CHOICE FOR BOTH THE JUDGE AND OTHER PARTICIPANTS (UNLESS ACTUALLY SPEAKING)

WEARING FACEMASKS IN THE COURTROOM: A MATTER OF CHOICE FOR BOTH THE JUDGE AND OTHER PARTICIPANTS (UNLESS ACTUALLY SPEAKING)

November 19, 2020 · by gexall · in Civil Procedure, Coronavirus, Members Content

The Senior and Deputy Senior Presiding Judges at the Royal Courts of Justice issued guidance on the 17th November 2020 which replaced earlier guidance on this topic.  The guidance deals with wearing facemasks in the court room. THE GUIDANCE “Wearing…

APPEALS,  ISSUES OF FACT AND SAILING IN DIFFERENT OCEANS IN THE COURT OF APPEAL: CLINICAL NEGLIGENCE DECISION TODAY

APPEALS, ISSUES OF FACT AND SAILING IN DIFFERENT OCEANS IN THE COURT OF APPEAL: CLINICAL NEGLIGENCE DECISION TODAY

November 18, 2020 · by gexall · in Appeals, Applications, Civil evidence, Clinical Negligence, Members Content

In Hewes v West Hertfordshire Acute Hospitals NHS Trust & Ors [2020] EWCA Civ 1523 the Court of Appeal reiterated the difficulties faced by an appellant attempting to argue that the judge had erred in relation to findings of the…

COURT REFUSES PARTY PERMISSION TO RELY ON WITNESS STATEMENT SERVED LATE

COURT REFUSES PARTY PERMISSION TO RELY ON WITNESS STATEMENT SERVED LATE

November 18, 2020 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Relief from sanctions, Witness statements

In RGB Plastering Ltd v TAWE Drylining and Plastering Ltd [2020] EWHC 3028 (TCC)  HHJ Jarman QC (sitting as a judge of the High Court) refused the defendant permission to rely on a witness statement that was served late. “Ms…

REMOTE  HEARINGS: TRIAL CAN GO AHEAD WITH PARTICIPANTS FROM ABROAD ALLOWED TO WATCH (SUBJECT TO SAFEGUARDS)

REMOTE HEARINGS: TRIAL CAN GO AHEAD WITH PARTICIPANTS FROM ABROAD ALLOWED TO WATCH (SUBJECT TO SAFEGUARDS)

November 17, 2020 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil evidence, Coronavirus, Members Content, Remote hearings

In the judgment this morning in Huber & Anor v X-Yachts (GB) Ltd & Anor [2020] EWHC 3082 (TCC) Mr Justice Kerr rejected an argument that participants in a civil trial could not continue to watch the trial if they…

CORONAVIRUS LAW: FURTHER STATUTORY STAY ON EVICTIONS AND TAKING CONTROL OF GOODS

CORONAVIRUS LAW: FURTHER STATUTORY STAY ON EVICTIONS AND TAKING CONTROL OF GOODS

November 16, 2020 · by gexall · in Civil Procedure, Coronavirus, Members Content

The Public Health (Coronavirus) (Protection from Eviction and Taking Control of Goods) (England) Regulations 2020 come into force tomorrow. They prevent residential evictions (for the most part) until the 11th January 2021. THE REGULATIONS Citation, Commencement and Application 1.—(1) These Reg……

CLAIMANT'S CASE STRUCK OUT BECAUSE IT SAID TWO CONTRADICTORY THINGS: "JANUS-FACED" PLEADINGS NOT ALLOWED

CLAIMANT’S CASE STRUCK OUT BECAUSE IT SAID TWO CONTRADICTORY THINGS: “JANUS-FACED” PLEADINGS NOT ALLOWED

November 16, 2020 · by gexall · in Appeals, Applications, Damages, Members Content, Statements of Case

The judgment of Mr Justice Marcus Smith in Betesh Partnership -v- Evans [2020] EWHC 1589 (QB) contains interesting observations on the need for a claimant to plead a case that is not inconsistent.  I am working and citing  from the…

WITNESS STATEMENTS COULD BE DISCLOSED IF MENTIONED IN OPEN COURT: DEPP, THE UNCALLED WITNESSES AND THE MEDIA

WITNESS STATEMENTS COULD BE DISCLOSED IF MENTIONED IN OPEN COURT: DEPP, THE UNCALLED WITNESSES AND THE MEDIA

November 16, 2020 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Members Content, Witness statements

There are many aspects of the judgment in Depp II v News Group Newspapers Ltd & Anor [2020] EWHC 2911 (QB) that have gained wide media attention.  Here I want to look at two issues in relation to the failure…

A REMOTE HEARING IS NOT INNATELY UNFAIR: NOR DOES IT CREATE AN INEQUALITY OF ARMS

A REMOTE HEARING IS NOT INNATELY UNFAIR: NOR DOES IT CREATE AN INEQUALITY OF ARMS

November 13, 2020 · by gexall · in Coronavirus, Members Content, Remote hearings

In Attorney General of the Turks and Caicos Islands v Misick & Ors [2020] UKPC 30 the Privy Council rejected an argument that continuing a criminal trial by remote means would be innately unfair. ” It cannot be said that…

FUNDAMENTAL DISHONESTY, APPEALS AND RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS: CLAIMANT'S PROPOSED APPEAL COMES TO GRIEF

FUNDAMENTAL DISHONESTY, APPEALS AND RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS: CLAIMANT’S PROPOSED APPEAL COMES TO GRIEF

November 13, 2020 · by gexall · in Appeals, Applications, Fundamental Dishonesty, Members Content, Relief from sanctions

The judgment of Mr Justice Lavender in Kamara v Builder Depot Ltd [2020] EWHC 3046 (QB) contains a catalogue of material in relation to procedural issues and appeals.  However, here, I want to concentrate upon the issues relating to fundamental…

YOU CAN TEACH AN OLD JUDGE NEW TRICKS: TECHNOLOGY "EMBRACE IT: IT WILL MAKE YOUR JOB EASIER"

YOU CAN TEACH AN OLD JUDGE NEW TRICKS: TECHNOLOGY “EMBRACE IT: IT WILL MAKE YOUR JOB EASIER”

November 12, 2020 · by gexall · in Bundles, Case Management, Coronavirus, Members Content, Remote hearings

In S (Fact-Finding) [2020] EWFC 71 HHJ Jack sitting as a High Court Judge heard a case remotely.  I will leave the analysis of his robust findings in the case – where the children were returned to their parents – …

COURT OF APPEAL CONSIDERS AWARD FOR  AS TO COSTS ON ACCOUNT: WHAT IS A "REASONABLE SUM"? (£325,000 IN THIS CASE)

COURT OF APPEAL CONSIDERS AWARD FOR AS TO COSTS ON ACCOUNT: WHAT IS A “REASONABLE SUM”? (£325,000 IN THIS CASE)

November 12, 2020 · by gexall · in Appeals, Costs, Interim Payments, Members Content

In Mousavi-Khalkali v Abrishamchi & Anor [2020] EWCA Civ 1493 we have a rare case of the Court of Appeal considering an appeal on an order that a party pay a sum on account of costs. THE CASE The Court…

ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF SERVICE FILED LATE - BUT JUDGMENT IN DEFAULT WAS IRREGULAR AND SET ASIDE: A REMINDER THAT THE RULES HAVE CHANGED

ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF SERVICE FILED LATE – BUT JUDGMENT IN DEFAULT WAS IRREGULAR AND SET ASIDE: A REMINDER THAT THE RULES HAVE CHANGED

November 12, 2020 · by gexall · in Appeals, Civil Procedure, Default judgment,, Members Content, Setting aside judgment

The judgment of Mr Justice Choudhury in  MB v RBG [2020] EWHC 3022 (QB) is the first I have seen considering the new provisions of CPR 12.3 and the circumstances in which a default judgment can be set aside.  It…

SERVICE OF THE CLAIM FORM: WHERE, AND WHY DO THINGS GO WRONG?  THE LULL BEFORE THE STORM?

SERVICE OF THE CLAIM FORM: WHERE, AND WHY DO THINGS GO WRONG? THE LULL BEFORE THE STORM?

November 11, 2020 · by gexall · in Avoiding negligence claims, Civil evidence, Members Content, Service of the claim form

It has been just over four weeks since the previous post on issues relating to service of the claim form.   I thought I would take advantage of this lull to remind people potential issues relating to service of the claim…

WORKING FROM HOME IN A LONELY WINTER (5):LITIGATION DEADLINES -  AVOIDING THE PAIN BY SHARING THE PAIN

WORKING FROM HOME IN A LONELY WINTER (5):LITIGATION DEADLINES – AVOIDING THE PAIN BY SHARING THE PAIN

November 10, 2020 · by gexall · in Avoiding negligence claims, Coronavirus, Members Content, Relief from sanctions, Well being

The fact that we are in lockdown does not make litigation deadlines go away.  Litigation may be more problematic, however there is now nothing in the rules that recognises the difficulties that litigators face.   One way of dealing with this…

LOSS OF EARNINGS AND THE SELF-EMPLOYED: SOME KEY ISSUES: (ALSO A WEBINAR...)

LOSS OF EARNINGS AND THE SELF-EMPLOYED: SOME KEY ISSUES: (ALSO A WEBINAR…)

November 9, 2020 · by gexall · in Damages, Members Content, Personal Injury, Webinar

There are now a record number of self-employed people working in the UK and the numbers are increasing.  The self-employed amount to 5 million, that is 15.3% of the workforce, (up from 12% in 2000).  Here I want to look…

STRIKING OUT A MULTI-PARTY CASE AS AN ABUSE OF PROCESS: WHEN CASE MANAGEMENT IS "AKIN TO TRYING TO BUILD A HOUSE OF CARDS IN A WIND TUNNEL"

STRIKING OUT A MULTI-PARTY CASE AS AN ABUSE OF PROCESS: WHEN CASE MANAGEMENT IS “AKIN TO TRYING TO BUILD A HOUSE OF CARDS IN A WIND TUNNEL”

November 9, 2020 · by gexall · in Abuse of Process, Members Content, Striking out

Returning to the substantive issue in the judgment of Turner J in Município De Mariana & Ors v BHP Group Plc & Anor [2020] EWHC 2930 (TCC). The judge struck out the claims of 202,600 claimants on the grounds that…

THOUSANDS OF DOCUMENTS AND LEAVING SOME POINTS ON THE CUTTING ROOM FLOOR: THE JUDGE'S LAMENT

THOUSANDS OF DOCUMENTS AND LEAVING SOME POINTS ON THE CUTTING ROOM FLOOR: THE JUDGE’S LAMENT

November 9, 2020 · by gexall · in Applications, Bundles, Case Management, Members Content

In  Município De Mariana & Ors v BHP Group Plc & Anor [2020] EWHC 2930 (TCC) Mr Justice Turner allowed the defendants’ application to strike out the claim being brought by 202,600 claimants.   Here we look at the observations in relation…

WORKING FROM HOME IN A LONELY WINTER (4): PRODUCTIVITY

WORKING FROM HOME IN A LONELY WINTER (4): PRODUCTIVITY

November 8, 2020 · by gexall · in Coronavirus, Members Content, Well being

How hard is it to say “productive” whilst working from home?  This issue has been addressed in a number of publications. Here are a selection from across the world. Stanford – The productivity pitfalls of working from home in the age…

WORKING FROM HOME IN A LONELY WINTER (3): STARTING A NEW JOB IN LOCKDOWN (WITH SOME HINTS FOR THE REST OF US AS WELL)

WORKING FROM HOME IN A LONELY WINTER (3): STARTING A NEW JOB IN LOCKDOWN (WITH SOME HINTS FOR THE REST OF US AS WELL)

November 7, 2020 · by gexall · in Coronavirus, Members Content, Well being

Some people are starting new jobs during lockdown.  Many trainees and pupils are also embarking upon their careers.  This post was actually suggested by someone doing just that – starting their (deferred) training contract early next year.  There are now…

SWIFT -v- CARPENTER: THE SUBSEQUENT COSTS JUDGMENT: AN ADDITIONAL £65,095.65; INDEMNITY COSTS & INCREASED INTERESTS: THE WISDOM OF MAKING A PART 36 OFFER WHEN APPEALING

November 6, 2020 · by gexall · in Appeals, Costs, Members Content, Part 36

On the day when it is announced that the Court of Appeal refused permission to appeal in the case of Swift -v- Carpenter it is interesting to look at the subsequent judgment on costs given today in Swift v Carpenter…

THE APPROACH OF THE COURT AT TRIAL WHEN A PARTY HAS NOT GIVEN DISCLOSURE: THE BENEFIT OF DOUBT IS AGAINST THEM

THE APPROACH OF THE COURT AT TRIAL WHEN A PARTY HAS NOT GIVEN DISCLOSURE: THE BENEFIT OF DOUBT IS AGAINST THEM

November 6, 2020 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Disclosure, Members Content, Sanctions

In Aegean Baltic Bank SA v Renzlor Shipping Ltd [2020] EWHC 2851 (Comm) Mr Adrian Beltrami QC (sitting as a Judge of the High Court) considered the appropriate approach at trial when a party has been debarred from calling evidence….

PROVING THINGS 185: SAYING "I'M BROKE" DOES NOT PROVE IMPECUNIOSITY: "THE DEFENDANT IS ENTITLED TO KNOW THE CASE THEY HAVE TO MEET"

PROVING THINGS 185: SAYING “I’M BROKE” DOES NOT PROVE IMPECUNIOSITY: “THE DEFENDANT IS ENTITLED TO KNOW THE CASE THEY HAVE TO MEET”

November 5, 2020 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Damages, Members Content, Witness statements

We are returning again to the Court of Appeal decision in Diriye v Bojaj & Anor [2020] EWCA Civ 1400. This time concentrating upon the Court’s comments in relation to the need to prove impecuniosity and the claimant’s failure to…

WORKING FROM HOME IN A LONELY WINTER (2): DEALING WITH LONELINESS - ADVICE FOR LAWYERS (AND OTHERS)

WORKING FROM HOME IN A LONELY WINTER (2): DEALING WITH LONELINESS – ADVICE FOR LAWYERS (AND OTHERS)

November 5, 2020 · by gexall · in Coronavirus, Members Content, Well being

Working from home can be a lonely experience. This can be tough, particularly in the winter months.  In the second in this series we  look at some of the helpful guidance that is available for dealing with issues relating to…

"A MARKED 'DISCONNECT' BETWEEN THE RESPONDENT'S WRITTEN EVIDENCE AND HIS ORAL TESTIMONY": ANOTHER "ARGUMENTATIVE" WITNESS STATEMENT BITES THE DUST

“A MARKED ‘DISCONNECT’ BETWEEN THE RESPONDENT’S WRITTEN EVIDENCE AND HIS ORAL TESTIMONY”: ANOTHER “ARGUMENTATIVE” WITNESS STATEMENT BITES THE DUST

November 5, 2020 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Witness statements

The judgment of ICC Judge Barber in Leopard v Robinson [2020] EWHC 2928 (Ch) provides another example of a written witness statement being misused. The judge held that the statement consisted of “assertions and legal submissions”. These have no place…

APPLYING FOR RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS: TWO CLASSIC MISTAKES AND A REMINDER OF 10 KEY POINTS

APPLYING FOR RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS: TWO CLASSIC MISTAKES AND A REMINDER OF 10 KEY POINTS

November 4, 2020 · by gexall · in Applications, Members Content, Relief from sanctions

The judgment in Diriye v Bojaj & Anor [2020] EWCA Civ 1400 shows, at least, two classic mistakes that people make when applying for relief from sanctions: not making the application promptly and not remedying the default properly (in fact…

APPLICATION TO ADDUCE NEW PHOTOGRAPHS AFTER FINAL SUBMISSIONS REFUSED: DENTON PRINCIPLES APPLIED

APPLICATION TO ADDUCE NEW PHOTOGRAPHS AFTER FINAL SUBMISSIONS REFUSED: DENTON PRINCIPLES APPLIED

November 4, 2020 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Members Content, Relief from sanctions

In Mullane v Davies [2020] EW Misc 25 (CC)  HHJ Jarman QC refused an application by a party to admit new photographs after closing submissions.  The Denton principles applied and militated against granting relief from sanctions. “Such noncompliance is serious,…

"THE DOG ATE MY HOMEWORK" EXCUSE DOESN'T WORK WELL IN COURT: THE JUDGE MAY HAVE BEEN WRONG ABOUT THE WAY "SIGNED FOR 1ST CLASS" OPERATED BUT THEY WERE RIGHT TO REFUSE RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS: COURT OF APPEAL DECIION

“THE DOG ATE MY HOMEWORK” EXCUSE DOESN’T WORK WELL IN COURT: THE JUDGE MAY HAVE BEEN WRONG ABOUT THE WAY “SIGNED FOR 1ST CLASS” OPERATED BUT THEY WERE RIGHT TO REFUSE RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS: COURT OF APPEAL DECIION

November 4, 2020 · by gexall · in Appeals, Applications, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Damages, Members Content, Relief from sanctions, Sanctions

In Diriye v Bojaj & Anor [2020] EWCA Civ 1400 the Court of Appeal held that the judges who heard a relief from sanctions hearing below were in error about the way that “Signed for 1st class” post operated, however…

SECOND DEFENDANT ORDERED TO PAY COSTS CLAIMANT INCURRED IN PURSUING FIRST DEFENDANT: AN UNUSUAL CASE

SECOND DEFENDANT ORDERED TO PAY COSTS CLAIMANT INCURRED IN PURSUING FIRST DEFENDANT: AN UNUSUAL CASE

November 4, 2020 · by gexall · in Costs, Members Content

In Patel v Barlows & Ors (No. 2) [2020] EWHC 2795 (Ch) HHJ Mithani QC (sitting as a High Court judge) found that a defendant was liable to pay the costs of another defendant where the claimant had had to…

WORKING FROM HOME IN A LONELY WINTER (1): DECOMPRESSION - WINDING DOWN AFTER WORK FINISHES

WORKING FROM HOME IN A LONELY WINTER (1): DECOMPRESSION – WINDING DOWN AFTER WORK FINISHES

November 3, 2020 · by gexall · in Coronavirus, Members Content, Remote hearings, Well being

There are many posts on this blog about  issues relating to working from home. In the early stage of the “first” lockdown many practitioners kindly contributed to a series of posts about the practicalities of  home working, a new experience…

PROCEEDINGS BROUGHT BY BANKRUPT WERE “DOOMED TO FAIL”: AN IMPORTANT REMINDER

November 2, 2020 · by gexall · in Civil Procedure, Insolvency, Members Content

Part of the judgment of Mr Justice Griffiths in Lambert v Forest of Dean District Council [2020] EWHC 2854 (Admin) provides an important reminder that someone who has been declared bankrupt may have no standing at all to bring subsequent…

COSTS: "ROLLED UP" OFFER OF SETTLEMENT, INCLUDING COSTS DID NOT GIVE A DEFENDANT ANY PROTECTION

COSTS: “ROLLED UP” OFFER OF SETTLEMENT, INCLUDING COSTS DID NOT GIVE A DEFENDANT ANY PROTECTION

November 2, 2020 · by gexall · in Costs, Members Content, Part 36

The judgment of Mr Justice Freedman in Comberg v VivoPower International Services Ltd & Anor [2020] EWHC 2787 (QB) contains many interesting observations in relation to damages, mitigation and costs.  Here I want to isolate one element – the fact…

ILLEGALITY AND DAMAGES: SUPREME COURT DECISION: SOMEONE WHO COMMITS MANSLAUGHTER CANNOT BRING AN ACTION IN NEGLIGENCE

November 2, 2020 · by gexall · in Appeals, Damages, Members Content, Personal Injury

In Henderson v Dorset Healthcare University NHS Foundation Trust [2020] UKSC 43  the Supreme Court dismissed an appeal on the grounds that the claimant’s action was based on illegality. It found that someone found guilty of manslaughter due to diminished…

HOW SHOULD DAMAGES FOR PAIN AND SUFFERING BE ASSESSED WHEN PROVISIONAL DAMAGES ARE BEING AWARDED? A HIGH COURT CASE

HOW SHOULD DAMAGES FOR PAIN AND SUFFERING BE ASSESSED WHEN PROVISIONAL DAMAGES ARE BEING AWARDED? A HIGH COURT CASE

November 1, 2020 · by gexall · in Damages, Members Content, Personal Injury

In  Hamilton v NG Bailey Ltd [2020] EWHC 2910 (QB) Dan Squires QC (sitting as a Deputy High Court Judge) considered the issue of what discount should be made on an award for pain, suffering and loss of amenity, when…

CIVIL PROCEDURE: BLOG AND ARTICLES ROUND UP OCTOBER 2020

CIVIL PROCEDURE: BLOG AND ARTICLES ROUND UP OCTOBER 2020

October 31, 2020 · by gexall · in Case Management, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Useful links

This round up covers specific posts and articles in relation to civil procedure .  There is a monthly round up of a wide range of legal issues and coronavirus on the Kings Chambers blog, Coronavirus: Guidance for Lawyers and Business….

COURTESY, THE ADVOCATE AND THE LAWYER: TEN THINGS TO THINK ABOUT TO HELP YOUR CLIENTS (AND YOURSELVES)

COURTESY, THE ADVOCATE AND THE LAWYER: TEN THINGS TO THINK ABOUT TO HELP YOUR CLIENTS (AND YOURSELVES)

October 30, 2020 · by gexall · in Advocacy, Conduct, Members Content

A tweet from a barrister, this afternoon complained, in essence about the “pointless aggression” of an opponent. It has gathered lots of support.   One thing that judges, from around the world, are universally keen on is courtesy.   This gives me…

A "LACK OF OBJECTIVITY" IN AN EXPERT'S APPROACH: CLINICAL NEGLIGENCE AND CAUSATION CONSIDERED IN THE HIGH COURT

A “LACK OF OBJECTIVITY” IN AN EXPERT’S APPROACH: CLINICAL NEGLIGENCE AND CAUSATION CONSIDERED IN THE HIGH COURT

October 30, 2020 · by gexall · in Clinical Negligence, Credibility of experts, Expert evidence, Experts, Members Content

In Leach v North East Ambulance Service NHS Foundation Trust [2020] EWHC 2914 (QB) HHJ Freedman (sitting as a Deputy High Court Judge) made some telling observations about the lack of objectivity of the defendant’s expert. THE CASE The claimant…

THE IMPORTANCE OF GETTING EVIDENCE EARLY:  "I DON'T REMEMBER NOW & I WON'T REMEMBER ANYTHING IF I COME TO COURT"

THE IMPORTANCE OF GETTING EVIDENCE EARLY: “I DON’T REMEMBER NOW & I WON’T REMEMBER ANYTHING IF I COME TO COURT”

October 30, 2020 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Members Content, Witness statements

The observations of Mr Justice Nicklin in Rayner v Seabourne-Hawkins [2020] EWHC 2895 (QB) highlight the importance of gathering evidence promptly.  It also contains the text of a highly perceptive letter from a prospective witness that, in many ways, highlights…

TOP 10 HALLOWEEN WORRIES FOR LAWYERS: TIME LIMITS, TRIAL BUNDLES AND WAKING UP IN THE MIDDLE OF THE NIGHT...

TOP 10 HALLOWEEN WORRIES FOR LAWYERS: TIME LIMITS, TRIAL BUNDLES AND WAKING UP IN THE MIDDLE OF THE NIGHT…

October 30, 2020 · by gexall · in Applications, Avoiding negligence claims, Members Content, Useful links

Today is a special day and I thought I’d start by looking at what scares lawyers most?  This was discussed in 2017, there was another useful post on scary stuff in 2018.  I have made a selection from the 2017…

THE DANGERS OF APPLYING FOR NON-PARTY COSTS ORDERS: THE APPLICANT HAS TO PAY THE PRICE: COURT OF APPEAL DECISION TODAY

THE DANGERS OF APPLYING FOR NON-PARTY COSTS ORDERS: THE APPLICANT HAS TO PAY THE PRICE: COURT OF APPEAL DECISION TODAY

October 29, 2020 · by gexall · in Appeals, Applications, Costs, Members Content

In the judgment today in Deepchand & Anor v Sooben [2020] EWCA Civ 1409 the Court of Appeal overturned a decision that there be no order for costs when a party made an unsuccessful application for a non-party costs order. …

PART 36: JUDGE WAS WRONG NOT TO ALLOW ENHANCED INTEREST WHEN CLAIMANT BEAT ITS OWN OFFER: COURT OF APPEAL DECISION

PART 36: JUDGE WAS WRONG NOT TO ALLOW ENHANCED INTEREST WHEN CLAIMANT BEAT ITS OWN OFFER: COURT OF APPEAL DECISION

October 29, 2020 · by gexall · in Appeals, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Part 36

In the judgment today in Telefonica UK Ltd v The Office of Communications [2020] EWCA Civ 1374 the Court of Appeal overturned the decision of the trial judge not to award additional interest on damages and costs in a case…

CORONAVIRUS AND CIVIL PROCEDURE: THE PRACTICE DIRECTION ENDS TOMORROW: REVIEW OF THE CASES

CORONAVIRUS AND CIVIL PROCEDURE: THE PRACTICE DIRECTION ENDS TOMORROW: REVIEW OF THE CASES

October 29, 2020 · by gexall · in Amendment, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Coronavirus, Members Content

Practice Direction 51ZA which allows parties to extend time limits for up to 56 days comes to an end on the 30th October 2020.   Unless there is a further rule change then parties can only agree extensions of 28 days. …

← Previous 1 … 63 64 65 … 142 Next →

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email. Subscription notifies you of a new post, it does not give you access to members' content.

Join 12.4K other subscribers

Recent Posts

  • EXPERT WATCH 45: THE JUDGE PREFERS TO THE EVIDENCE WHO HAD EXPERIENCE AND “GENUINE EXPERIENCE IN THE SUBJECT AREA”
  • WITNESS EVIDENCE WEDNESDAY: KEEPING COMMERCIAL LITIGATORS OFF THE NAUGHTY STEP: WEBINAR PLUS USEFUL CHECKLISTS AND PRECEDENTS: 30th APRIL 2026
  • THE COSTS LIABILITY OF A REPRESENTATIVE OF A DECEASED PERSON UNDER CPR 19.12 CONSIDERED: THE SITUATION IS NOT THE SAME AS AN ADMINISTRATOR OR EXECUTOR
  • COST BITES 380: “ALWAYS CHOOSE A COSTS LAWYER FOR EXPERT LEGAL COSTS ADVICE”: GUIDANCE FROM THE SRA
  • COMMERCIAL LITIGATORS ON THE NAUGHTY STEP 5: PD57AC AND REFERENCE TO DOCUMENTS: WHY LAWYERS NEED TO BE PRISED AWAY FROM THEIR COMFORT BLANKETS

Top Posts

  • COST BITES 380: "ALWAYS CHOOSE A COSTS LAWYER FOR EXPERT LEGAL COSTS ADVICE": GUIDANCE FROM THE SRA
  • EXPERT WATCH 45: THE JUDGE PREFERS TO THE EVIDENCE WHO HAD EXPERIENCE AND "GENUINE EXPERIENCE IN THE SUBJECT AREA"
  • THE COSTS LIABILITY OF A REPRESENTATIVE OF A DECEASED PERSON UNDER CPR 19.12 CONSIDERED: THE SITUATION IS NOT THE SAME AS AN ADMINISTRATOR OR EXECUTOR
  • WITNESS EVIDENCE WEDNESDAY: KEEPING COMMERCIAL LITIGATORS OFF THE NAUGHTY STEP: WEBINAR PLUS USEFUL CHECKLISTS AND PRECEDENTS: 30th APRIL 2026
  • ACTION STRUCK OUT UNDER CPR 3.4(2)(c) FOR NON COMPLIANCE: DENTON PRINCIPLES APPLIED

Archives

Blogroll

  • Fatal Accident Law
  • Legal Futures
  • Personal injury: Liability and Damages

Books

  • Munkman & Exall on Damages for Personal Injuries and Death 15th ed
  • The APIL Guide to Fatal Accidents 4th edition

Useful Links

  • Buntools (for preparing PDF Bundles)
  • Kings Chambers
  • Kings Chambers Costs & Litigation Funding
  • Kings Chambers Serious Injury
  • The Civil Procedure Rules
  • The Law Society Gazette
  • The National Archives Recently Published Judgments
  • The Senior Court Costs Office Guide 2025
  • www.Bailii.org

Copyright

© Gordon Exall, Exall Legal Training, Civil Litigation Brief, 2013-2026. Unauthorised use and or duplication of the material contained on this blog without permission is strictly prohibited.
Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.

To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
  • Membership Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Advertising Policy
  • Copyright
  • Legal Disclaimer

Copyright © 2026 Civil Litigation Brief

Powered by Big Yellow Workshop

 

Loading Comments...
 

You must be logged in to post a comment.