Civil Litigation Brief
Menu
  • Home
  • About
  • Membership Plans
  • Webinars
  • Login
Updates and Commentary on Civil Procedure, by Gordon Exall, Barrister, Kings Chambers
Browse: Home » e-disclosure
FALSE EMAILS, METADATA AND  CPR 32.19:  A "PROCESS OF FALSIFICATION AND KNOWINGLY PUTTING FORWARD EVIDENCE THAT IS FALSE"

FALSE EMAILS, METADATA AND CPR 32.19: A “PROCESS OF FALSIFICATION AND KNOWINGLY PUTTING FORWARD EVIDENCE THAT IS FALSE”

August 1, 2017 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Disclosure, Members Content

 The case of 44 Wellfit Street Ltd v GMR Services Ltd [2017] EWHC 1841 (Ch) was described by Chris Dale as being  “like one a much-expanded version of those old-style Finals questions with kitchen sink thrown in”.  The judgment of Chief…

BUDGETS , PROPORTIONALITY AND DISCLOSURE: THE RELEVANT TEST APPLIED WHEN A PARTY "GOES AWRY"

October 26, 2015 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Disclosure, Members Content, Uncategorized

The judgment of Mr Justice Coulson in The Dorchester Group Ltd -v- Kier Construction Limited [2015] EWHC 3051 (TCC) contains much of interest in relation to admissions and procedure. However there are also interesting observations in relation to the way…

"DOCUMENTS WIN CASES"E-DISCLOSURE AND EVIDENCE FOR THE 21st CENTURY LITIGATOR: LEEDS 20th OCTOBER; LONDON 22nd OCTOBER

September 24, 2015 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Members Content, Uncategorized, Witness statements

There is a panel session on e-disclosure and evidence  in central Leeds on the 20th October  and again in Lincoln’s Inn on the 22nd October. Both start at 4.00 pm and last two hours. LIVE AT LEEDS The session in…

EVIDENCE, THE INTERNET AND SOCIAL MEDIA: FACEBOOK AND YOUTUBE EXPOSE DEFENDANT

September 14, 2015 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil evidence, Members Content, Uncategorized, Witness statements

The judgment of Judge Seymour in Cirencester Friendly Society -v- Parkin [2015] EWHC 1750(QB) provides another example of how the social media and the internet provides ammunition in litigation. Here we have a case of a defendant helpfully providing telling…

DOCUMENTS WIN CASES: E-DISCLOSURE & EVIDENCE: LEEDS 20th OCTOBER 2015: SAVE THE DATE FOR YOUR DIARY

September 11, 2015 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Disclosure, Members Content, Uncategorized

Huron Legal, in association with Zenith Chambers, are running an evening panel session on “E-Disclosure and Evidence for the 21st Century Litigator.” It features, Chris Dale from the eDisclosure Information Project, Jonathan Maas from Huron and me. It lasts for…

RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS REFUSED FOLLOWING INADEQUATE E-DISCLOSURE:

June 22, 2015 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil Procedure, Disclosure, Members Content, Relief from sanctions

The case of Smailes -v- McNally [2015] EWHC 1755 (Ch) has appeared in the reports before.  In his judgment today His Honour Judge Pelling QC refused relief from sanctions after the claimant had failed to give adequate disclosure in compliance…

E-DISCLOSURE & BREACH OF ORDERS: CASE STRUCK OUT: NO QUESTION: AND NO QUARTER GIVEN

December 20, 2014 · by gexall · in Appeals, Applications, Costs, Disclosure, Members Content, Striking out

In Smailes -v-McNally [2014] EWCA Civ 1296 the Court of Appeal made it clear that breach of a peremptory order in relation to disclosure will lead to grave consequences for the defaulting litigant. THE CASE This case was looked at…

CHALLENGING THE AUTHENTICITY OF DOCUMENTS: THE IMPORTANCE OF KNOWING THE RULES & A FEW POINTS FROM THE CASES

October 20, 2014 · by gexall · in Civil Procedure, Expert evidence, Members Content, Relief from sanctions, Statements of Case, Written advocacy

The earlier post on Redstone Mortgages Ltd -v- B Legal Ltd[2014]EWHC 3390 (Ch)contained some important observations from the judge on the steps to be taken if a party wishes to challenge the authenticity of a document. Here we look at this…

FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH AN ORDER FOR E-DISCLOSURE: DECISION THAT A PARTY HAD COMPLIED OVERTURNED IN THE COURT OF APPEAL

August 1, 2014 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil Procedure, Disclosure, Members Content, Striking out

The first instance decision in  Smailes -v- McNally (Re Atrium Training Service) [2013] EWHC 2882 (Ch) was looked at in detail in a previous post in October last year.  It is worth noting that the Court of Appeal have overturned the…

HAS PROPER DISCLOSURE BEEN GIVEN? A NEW AREA OF BATTLE. GLOBAL MARINE DRILLSHIPS LIMITED –V- WILLIAM LA BELLA [2014] EWHC 1230 (Ch) CONSIDERED

April 27, 2014 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil Procedure, Disclosure, Members Content, Relief from sanctions

In the post Mitchell world parties are anxious to demonstrate that their opponents have not complied with orders of the court and, consequently, should have their actions struck out.  These arguments are likely to be particularly problematic in issues relating…

"PAPER MUST VANISH FROM THIS COURT": CANADIAN JUDGE ORDERS E-TRIAL TO PREVENT COURTS BECOMING MUSEUM PIECES

April 11, 2014 · by gexall · in Civil Procedure, Disclosure, Members Content

At a time when increased resources are promised to the court it is interesting to read the observations in the Canadian Courts of Brown J in the case of Broome Financial Corporation -v- Bank of Montreal 2014 ONSC 2178 (CanLII). Essentially…

RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS AND CPR 3.9: TWO CASES WHERE RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS WAS GRANTED

November 1, 2013 · by gexall · in Civil Procedure, Members Content, Relief from sanctions, Service of the claim form

The issues caused by the new CPR 3.9 have featured many times on this blog.   Here we look at two High Court decisions where relief from sanctions was granted.  Kesabo –v- African Barrick Gold Plc and (because the full transcript…

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email. Subscription notifies you of a new post, it does not give you access to members' content.

Join 16.8K other subscribers

Recent Posts

  • AVOIDING THE PITFALLS: DRAFTING SCHEDULES OF DAMAGES: WEBINAR 16th APRIL 2026: WITH SOME INTERESTING QUOTES TO WHET YOUR APPETITE..
  • WASTED COSTS ORDER MADE AGAINST SOLICITORS WHEN THEY WERE MISTAKEN AS TO WHO THEY WERE INSTRUCTED BY: THE DEFENDANT ESTABLISHES CAUSATION
  • COST BITES 375 : WHY THESE INTERIM BILLS WERE NOT STATUTORY BILLS: “VERY CLEAR EVIDENCE WOULD BE NEEDED TO ESTABLISH THAT AN INVOICE WHICH, ON ITS FACE, IS EXPRESSLY NOT FINAL HAS NONETHELESS BEEN AGREED TO BE FINAL”
  • MAZUR IN THE COURT OF APPEAL: WEBINAR WITH CHECKLISTS: NOW AVAILABLE “ON DEMAND”
  • THROWBACK FRIDAY (1): ADJOURNMENTS ON THE GROUNDS OF ILL HEALTH: A DETAILED CONSIDERATION (APRIL 2015)

Top Posts

  • JOINDER OF NEW PARTIES IN EXISTING PROCEEDINGS 2: THE PRINCIPLES (AND THE COSTS!)
  • SETTING ASIDE DEFAULT JUDGMENT: THE RELEVANCE OF DELAY AND THE DENTON PRINCIPLES CONSIDERED IN THE HIGH COURT
  • WASTED COSTS ORDER MADE AGAINST SOLICITORS WHEN THEY WERE MISTAKEN AS TO WHO THEY WERE INSTRUCTED BY: THE DEFENDANT ESTABLISHES CAUSATION
  • MAZUR(ISH) MATTERS 59: UNQUALIFIED PERSON NOT ALLOWED TO REPRESENT PARKING COMPANY AT A SMALL CLAIMS HEARING
  • THE JUDGE FOUND AGAINST ME BECAUSE THEY GAVE TOO MUCH LEEWAY TO A LITIGANT IN PERSON : ALLEGATIONS OF THIS KIND SHOULD BE PARTICULARISED (AND CAREFULLY THOUGHT OUT)

Archives

Blogroll

  • Fatal Accident Law
  • Legal Futures
  • Personal injury: Liability and Damages

Books

  • Munkman & Exall on Damages for Personal Injuries and Death 15th ed
  • The APIL Guide to Fatal Accidents 4th edition

Useful Links

  • Buntools (for preparing PDF Bundles)
  • Kings Chambers
  • Kings Chambers Costs & Litigation Funding
  • Kings Chambers Serious Injury
  • The Civil Procedure Rules
  • The Law Society Gazette
  • The National Archives Recently Published Judgments
  • The Senior Court Costs Office Guide 2025
  • www.Bailii.org

Copyright

© Gordon Exall, Exall Legal Training, Civil Litigation Brief, 2013-2026. Unauthorised use and or duplication of the material contained on this blog without permission is strictly prohibited.
Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.

To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
  • Membership Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Advertising Policy
  • Copyright
  • Legal Disclaimer

Copyright © 2026 Civil Litigation Brief

Powered by Big Yellow Workshop

 

Loading Comments...
 

You must be logged in to post a comment.