Civil Litigation Brief
Menu
  • Home
  • About
  • Membership Plans
  • Webinars
  • Login
Updates and Commentary on Civil Procedure, by Gordon Exall, Barrister, Kings Chambers
Browse: Home » Remote hearings
HEARINGS WHEN WITNESSES GIVE EVIDENCE FROM ABROAD: SOME  POINTS FOR PRACTITIONERS (AND JUDGES) TO WATCH: "IT WOULD ASSIST THE LOWER COURTS IF FORMAL CLARIFICATION IS GIVEN ADDRESSING THAT TENSION HEAD ON"

HEARINGS WHEN WITNESSES GIVE EVIDENCE FROM ABROAD: SOME POINTS FOR PRACTITIONERS (AND JUDGES) TO WATCH: “IT WOULD ASSIST THE LOWER COURTS IF FORMAL CLARIFICATION IS GIVEN ADDRESSING THAT TENSION HEAD ON”

June 20, 2025 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Remote hearings

There have been a number of cases where litigants have run into difficulties because they  have not complied with the requirements for witnesses who give evidence  remotely from abroad.  We see an example of this case where there a conflict…

THE MAN ON THE CLAPHAM OMNIBUS -  WHICH IS NOT A GOOD PLACE TO BE WHEN GIVING EVIDENCE AT A REMOTE HEARING

THE MAN ON THE CLAPHAM OMNIBUS – WHICH IS NOT A GOOD PLACE TO BE WHEN GIVING EVIDENCE AT A REMOTE HEARING

November 8, 2024 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil evidence, Members Content, Remote hearings

In Raja & Anor v ATM Law & Ors [2024] EWHC 2782 (Ch) the witnesses gave evidence (or attempted to give evidence) from inappropriate places, including a bus.  The judgment of Master Clark shows the need to follow the correct…

PROVING THINGS 234: REMOTE EVIDENCE FROM OUTSIDE THE JURISDICTION: PARTY CALLING WITNESSES HITS A PROBLEM

PROVING THINGS 234: REMOTE EVIDENCE FROM OUTSIDE THE JURISDICTION: PARTY CALLING WITNESSES HITS A PROBLEM

November 2, 2023 · by gexall · in Case Management, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Remote hearings, Witness statements

The judgment of Deputy District Judge Batstone in  Amanda Seafood PTE Ltd v Sykes Seafood Ltd [2023] EW Misc 13 (CC) illustrates the care that needs to be taken when attempting to call a witness who is giving evidence remotely…

COURT REFUSES DEFENDANT'S APPLICATION THAT DEFENDANT'S KENYAN WITNESSES SHOULD APPEAR BY VIDEO LINK:

COURT REFUSES DEFENDANT’S APPLICATION THAT DEFENDANT’S KENYAN WITNESSES SHOULD APPEAR BY VIDEO LINK:

April 12, 2022 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil evidence, Members Content, Remote hearings

In  Jackson v Hayes & Jarvis (Travel) Ltd [2022] EWHC 453 (QB) Mrs Justice Eady refused the defendant’s application that its witnesses give evidence by video link from Kenya. “I am left with, on the one hand, an absence of…

A WITNESS GIVING EVIDENCE WHILST DRIVING A CAR: THEN FROM A CROWDED OFFICE AND THEN WITHOUT MOST OF THE DOCUMENTS AVAILABLE: THIS DOES NOT END WELL

A WITNESS GIVING EVIDENCE WHILST DRIVING A CAR: THEN FROM A CROWDED OFFICE AND THEN WITHOUT MOST OF THE DOCUMENTS AVAILABLE: THIS DOES NOT END WELL

February 24, 2022 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Members Content, Remote hearings

There are passages in the judgment of Recorder Douglas Campbell QC in  ASR Interiors Ltd v AWS Trading Ltd & Anor [2022] EWHC 372 (IPEC) which demonstrate a remarkably “relaxed” attitude to giving evidence in court by one of the…

WITNESSES AND REMOTE HEARINGS: HOW IS IT GOING?  IT IS WORTHWHILE AS LONG AS THE TECHNOLOGY WORKS

WITNESSES AND REMOTE HEARINGS: HOW IS IT GOING? IT IS WORTHWHILE AS LONG AS THE TECHNOLOGY WORKS

December 8, 2021 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Clinical Negligence, Members Content, Remote hearings

I am grateful to John De Bono QC for sending me a copy of the judgment of HHJ Tindal in Freeman -v- Pennine Acute Hospitals NHS Trust, a copy of which is available here. Freeman v Pennine NHS Judgment 03.12.21(without…

THE CONSEQUENCES OF FAILING TO FILE AN ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF SERVICE: NO INJUSTICE WHEN A DEBARRED PARTY ATTENDED A TRIAL BY SKYPE: COURT OF APPEAL DECISION

October 15, 2021 · by gexall · in Appeals, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Default judgment,, Members Content, Remote hearings

In Hirachand v Hirachand & Anor [2021] EWCA Civ 1498 the Court of Appeal rejected an argument that a defendant, who had not filed an acknowledgement of service and had been debarred from taking part in the action, suffered injustice…

TRANSCRIBERS, LIVE RECORDING AND COURT HEARINGS: COURT SENDS OUT  A WARNING: FOLLOW THE RULES AND GET PERMISSION IN ADVANCE

TRANSCRIBERS, LIVE RECORDING AND COURT HEARINGS: COURT SENDS OUT A WARNING: FOLLOW THE RULES AND GET PERMISSION IN ADVANCE

June 24, 2021 · by gexall · in Avoiding negligence claims, Case Management, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Remote hearings

In JR & B Farming Limited v Hewitt [2021] EWHC 1704 (Comm) HH- Davis-White QC (sitting as a High Court judge) issued a clear warning to parties and transcription services that they must follow the correct procedure if a record…

STATEMENT ON THE ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE POST-PANDEMIC: FOUR BARS ISSUE A WARNING

STATEMENT ON THE ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE POST-PANDEMIC: FOUR BARS ISSUE A WARNING

May 21, 2021 · by gexall · in Civil Procedure, Members Content, Remote hearings

In a document issued on the 5th May the Bar Council of England and Wales, the Bar of Ireland, the Bar Council of Northern Ireland and the Faculty of Advocates of Scotland sent out an important message about post-pandemic hearings. …

CLAIMANT NOT SUCCESSFUL IN  APPLICATION THAT A WITNESS ATTEND IN PERSON AND NOT REMOTELY

CLAIMANT NOT SUCCESSFUL IN APPLICATION THAT A WITNESS ATTEND IN PERSON AND NOT REMOTELY

January 14, 2021 · by gexall · in Case Management, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Coronavirus, Members Content, Remote hearings

In Langley v GMB & Ors [2020] EWHC 3619 (QB) Mrs Justice Stacy refused a claimant’s application for an order that a defendant’s witness attend court personally.  The matter could proceed fairly with the witness attending remotely.  This judgment (given…

COVID DOESN'T STOP THE COURTS GOING ON: BUT GREAT CARE IS NEEDED

COVID DOESN’T STOP THE COURTS GOING ON: BUT GREAT CARE IS NEEDED

January 12, 2021 · by gexall · in Adjournments, Applications, Civil Procedure, Coronavirus, Members Content, Remote hearings

In Bilta (UK) Ltd & Ors v SVS Securities Plc & Ors [2021] EWHC 36 (Ch) Mr Justice Marcus Smith examined in detail the principles relating to court hearings during COVID.  There is an examination of the steps that need…

IT IS UNLAWFUL TO TAKE PHOTOGRAPHS OF A TRIAL CONDUCTED REMOTELY

IT IS UNLAWFUL TO TAKE PHOTOGRAPHS OF A TRIAL CONDUCTED REMOTELY

January 6, 2021 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil evidence, Conduct, Coronavirus, Members Content, Remote hearings

In SLF Associates Inc v (1) HSBC (UK) Bank Plc & Ors [2021] EWHC 5 (Ch) Master Kaye pointed out that taking photographs of participants in a remote  court was unlawful. THE CASE The Master was giving judgment in a…

REVIEW OF CIVIL PROCEDURE IN 2020 2: BEST WRITING ON CIVIL PROCEDURE DURING THE YEAR: TWO WISE KINGS

REVIEW OF CIVIL PROCEDURE IN 2020 2: BEST WRITING ON CIVIL PROCEDURE DURING THE YEAR: TWO WISE KINGS

December 24, 2020 · by gexall · in Charity, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Remote hearings

This year saw a explosion of legal writing as everyone had to get to grips with the procedural mayhem that resulted in lockdown.  This is an appropriate time to pay tribute to all those who wrote. Some  of the best…

MORE GUIDANCE FROM JUDGES ON PREPARATION AND ADVOCACY IN REMOTE HEARINGS: "WEAR PANTS, SEQUESTER PETS"

MORE GUIDANCE FROM JUDGES ON PREPARATION AND ADVOCACY IN REMOTE HEARINGS: “WEAR PANTS, SEQUESTER PETS”

December 8, 2020 · by gexall · in Advocacy, Coronavirus, Members Content, Remote hearings

I started the day with a look at guidance for remote hearings.  As is often the way more useful guidance came out this morning in Bloomberg Law “Wear Pants, Sequester Pets: Five Tips From Judges for Zoom Court”. THE GUIDANCE…

REMOTE HEARINGS AND REMOTE ADVOCACY: USEFUL LINKS FROM THE UK AND BEYOND...

REMOTE HEARINGS AND REMOTE ADVOCACY: USEFUL LINKS FROM THE UK AND BEYOND…

December 8, 2020 · by gexall · in Advocacy, Coronavirus, Members Content, Remote hearings, Written advocacy

Lawyers all over the world are getting to grips with advocacy via a computer screen.  This is an opportune time to look at the useful guidance out their for those undertaking and preparing hearings and trials that are heard remotely….

ELECTRONIC BUNDLES AND PROBLEMS AT TRIAL: IF PAGES ARE ADDED IT IS NOT PLAIN SAILING

ELECTRONIC BUNDLES AND PROBLEMS AT TRIAL: IF PAGES ARE ADDED IT IS NOT PLAIN SAILING

December 4, 2020 · by gexall · in Bundles, Case Management, Members Content, Remote hearings

Readers have been waiting, with anticipation, for cases about electronic bundles.   The judgment of HHJ Pearce in Global Technologies Racing Ltd v 5 West (t/a Alex Thomson Racing) [2020] EWHC 3334 (Comm) shows the problems that can occur in relation…

REMOTE  HEARINGS: TRIAL CAN GO AHEAD WITH PARTICIPANTS FROM ABROAD ALLOWED TO WATCH (SUBJECT TO SAFEGUARDS)

REMOTE HEARINGS: TRIAL CAN GO AHEAD WITH PARTICIPANTS FROM ABROAD ALLOWED TO WATCH (SUBJECT TO SAFEGUARDS)

November 17, 2020 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil evidence, Coronavirus, Members Content, Remote hearings

In the judgment this morning in Huber & Anor v X-Yachts (GB) Ltd & Anor [2020] EWHC 3082 (TCC) Mr Justice Kerr rejected an argument that participants in a civil trial could not continue to watch the trial if they…

A REMOTE HEARING IS NOT INNATELY UNFAIR: NOR DOES IT CREATE AN INEQUALITY OF ARMS

A REMOTE HEARING IS NOT INNATELY UNFAIR: NOR DOES IT CREATE AN INEQUALITY OF ARMS

November 13, 2020 · by gexall · in Coronavirus, Members Content, Remote hearings

In Attorney General of the Turks and Caicos Islands v Misick & Ors [2020] UKPC 30 the Privy Council rejected an argument that continuing a criminal trial by remote means would be innately unfair. ” It cannot be said that…

YOU CAN TEACH AN OLD JUDGE NEW TRICKS: TECHNOLOGY "EMBRACE IT: IT WILL MAKE YOUR JOB EASIER"

YOU CAN TEACH AN OLD JUDGE NEW TRICKS: TECHNOLOGY “EMBRACE IT: IT WILL MAKE YOUR JOB EASIER”

November 12, 2020 · by gexall · in Bundles, Case Management, Coronavirus, Members Content, Remote hearings

In S (Fact-Finding) [2020] EWFC 71 HHJ Jack sitting as a High Court Judge heard a case remotely.  I will leave the analysis of his robust findings in the case – where the children were returned to their parents – …

WHEN A LITIGANT DOES NOT HAVE A COMPUTER AT COURT: WHAT IS THE PRACTICAL RESPONSE?

WHEN A LITIGANT DOES NOT HAVE A COMPUTER AT COURT: WHAT IS THE PRACTICAL RESPONSE?

October 16, 2020 · by gexall · in Access to justice, Coronavirus, Members Content, Remote hearings

In  BM Electrical Solutions Ltd & Anor v Belcher [2020] EWHC 2749 (Ch) a very practical problem occurred. The court held a “hybrid” hearing, a litigant appeared in person.  The litigant in person did not have a laptop with them….

WITNESSES AT SEA: EVIDENCE FROM THE HIGH SEAS

WITNESSES AT SEA: EVIDENCE FROM THE HIGH SEAS

October 5, 2020 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Members Content, Remote hearings

The judgment of Mr Justice Teare (sitting with two assessors) in  Sakizaya Kalon, Owners of The Vessel v Panamax Alexander, Owners of The Vessel [2020] EWHC 2604 (Admlty) shows some real advantages of being able to take witness evidence remotely. …

ONLINE COURTS DURING THE PANDEMIC:  RESEARCH AND QUESTIONS:  LESSONS FROM TEXAS

ONLINE COURTS DURING THE PANDEMIC: RESEARCH AND QUESTIONS: LESSONS FROM TEXAS

September 28, 2020 · by gexall · in Access to justice, Coronavirus, Members Content, Remote hearings

The problems of keeping the courts going during a pandemic are universal and worldwide. Countries throughout the globe  are getting to grips with the problems caused by remote hearings.  Professor Elizabeth Thornburg  from the Southern Methodist University has written a…

PROTOCOL FOR INSOLVENCY AND COMPANY WORK AT CENTRAL LONDON COUNTY COURT: APPLICABLE FROM TODAY

PROTOCOL FOR INSOLVENCY AND COMPANY WORK AT CENTRAL LONDON COUNTY COURT: APPLICABLE FROM TODAY

September 7, 2020 · by gexall · in Civil Procedure, Coronavirus, Members Content, Remote hearings

A Protocol for insolvency and company work at Central London applies from today. It is set out in full below. It sets out details for remote hearings of bulk and other work made necessary by the pandemic. “PROTOCOL FOR INSOLVENCY…

GUIDANCE ON GIVING REMOTE EVIDENCE: ESSENTIAL READING FROM THE ACADEMY OF EXPERTS

GUIDANCE ON GIVING REMOTE EVIDENCE: ESSENTIAL READING FROM THE ACADEMY OF EXPERTS

September 3, 2020 · by gexall · in Applications, Coronavirus, Expert evidence, Experts, Members Content, Remote hearings, Useful links

The Academy of Experts have written Guidance on Giving Remote Evidence. Although this is aimed at expert witnesses there is much that anyone involved in litigation can take away from this.   SELECTED EXTRACTS There is much that is useful. …

PROVING PROPENSITY AND SIMILAR FACT EVIDENCE IN CIVIL CASES: COURT OF APPEAL JUDGMENT TODAY

August 18, 2020 · by gexall · in Appeals, Civil evidence, Members Content, Remote hearings

In the judgment today in R v P (Children: Similar Fact Evidence) [2020] EWCA Civ 1088 the Court of Appeal set out the principles relating to similar fact evidence in civil and family cases.   The case is also an example…

REMOTE HEARINGS: ZOOM PLATFORM USED, AND WORKED: ALSO AN ENTRY FOR THE OPENING LINE OF JUDGMENT CONTEST: "FAMILY LAW CRAVES FINALITY"

REMOTE HEARINGS: ZOOM PLATFORM USED, AND WORKED: ALSO AN ENTRY FOR THE OPENING LINE OF JUDGMENT CONTEST: “FAMILY LAW CRAVES FINALITY”

August 17, 2020 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil Procedure, Coronavirus, Members Content, Remote hearings

In LB v DB [2020] EWFC B34 (OJ) Deputy District Judge Hodson expressed his dissatisfaction with telephone hearings, but found that a zoom hearing worked.  This has not been a platform viewed with favour by the court authorities, yet appears…

COURTESY AND CORRESPONDENCE: "NOTHING WAS SAID TO ACKNOWLEDGE OR ACCEPT THE JUDGE'S CRITICISM OF THE HIGH-HANDED MANNER IN WHICH THE ASSOCIATE SOLICITOR HAD SOUGHT TO TELL THE COURT HOW THE TRIAL WAS GOING TO BE CONDUCTED"

COURTESY AND CORRESPONDENCE: “NOTHING WAS SAID TO ACKNOWLEDGE OR ACCEPT THE JUDGE’S CRITICISM OF THE HIGH-HANDED MANNER IN WHICH THE ASSOCIATE SOLICITOR HAD SOUGHT TO TELL THE COURT HOW THE TRIAL WAS GOING TO BE CONDUCTED”

August 7, 2020 · by gexall · in Applications, Conduct, Members Content, Remote hearings

The post yesterday on the decision in  Gubarev & Anor v Orbis Business Intelligence Ltd & Anor [2020] EWHC 2167 (QB) mentioned the issue that the Divisional Court had with the way in which the claimant’s solicitors had attempted to dictate…

REMOTE HEARINGS THE SOLICITOR'S DUTIES: (1) READ THE ORDERS MADE; (2)  DO NOT BE IN CONTEMPT OF COURT

REMOTE HEARINGS THE SOLICITOR’S DUTIES: (1) READ THE ORDERS MADE; (2) DO NOT BE IN CONTEMPT OF COURT

August 6, 2020 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Conduct, Coronavirus, Members Content, Remote hearings

In the judgment today in Gubarev & Anor v Orbis Business Intelligence Ltd & Anor [2020] EWHC 2167 (QB) the Divisional Court sent out a clear message that lawyers must follow orders of the court.  Live trials cannot be transmitted…

REMOTE HEARINGS: THE PLACE WHERE WITNESSES GIVE EVIDENCE FROM MUST BE APPROVED IN ADVANCE BY THE COURT

REMOTE HEARINGS: THE PLACE WHERE WITNESSES GIVE EVIDENCE FROM MUST BE APPROVED IN ADVANCE BY THE COURT

July 17, 2020 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil evidence, Coronavirus, Members Content, Remote hearings

We looked earlier at the judgment in Navigator Equities Ltd & Anor v Deripaska [2020] EWHC 1798 (Comm) in relation to committal proceedings. That judgment also has some important guidance about the way in which remote hearings are conducted and where…

CORONAVIRUS LAW: SHOULD A HEARING BE IN PERSON OR BY VIDEO?

CORONAVIRUS LAW: SHOULD A HEARING BE IN PERSON OR BY VIDEO?

June 25, 2020 · by gexall · in Applications, Coronavirus, Members Content, Remote hearings

In Surrey Heath Borough Council v Robb & Ors [2020] EWHC 1650 (QB) Mr Justice Freedman  considered submissions that a hearing should take place in person. He held that there was an onus on part requesting a hearing in court…

CLINICAL NEGLIGENCE TRIAL HELD REMOTELY: AND IT WORKED WELL...

CLINICAL NEGLIGENCE TRIAL HELD REMOTELY: AND IT WORKED WELL…

June 22, 2020 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Clinical Negligence, Coronavirus, Members Content, Remote hearings

I have highlighted some cases where remote hearings have had difficulties. In Jones v Ministry of Defence [2020] EWHC 1603 (QB) the judgment indicates that the remote hearing in a clinical negligence case worked well. THE CASE The case was…

WHEN REMOTE HEARINGS GO WRONG: AND STRUGGLING THROUGH TO PUT THEM RIGHT - AT WHOSE COSTS?

WHEN REMOTE HEARINGS GO WRONG: AND STRUGGLING THROUGH TO PUT THEM RIGHT – AT WHOSE COSTS?

June 17, 2020 · by gexall · in Arbitration,, Case Management, Civil Procedure, Coronavirus, Members Content, Remote hearings

I often listen to, and read, official statements about remote hearings with a degree of scepticism.   The impression is given that things are going smoothly. The reality is that things are often going awry and it is taking a great…

TRANSPARENCY PROJECT: REMOTE COURT HEARINGS GUIDANCE NOTE

TRANSPARENCY PROJECT: REMOTE COURT HEARINGS GUIDANCE NOTE

June 10, 2020 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Coronavirus, Members Content, Remote hearings

The Transparency Project have produced a Remote Court Hearings Guidance Note.  This is aimed at litigants themselves. Although it is quite specifically aimed at the Family Courts many litigants (and some lawyers) may find this of some assistance.   THE…

CIVIL UPDATE FOR NORTH AND WEST YORKSHIRE: UPDATED GUIDANCE FROM THE DESIGNATED CIVIL JUDGE

CIVIL UPDATE FOR NORTH AND WEST YORKSHIRE: UPDATED GUIDANCE FROM THE DESIGNATED CIVIL JUDGE

May 22, 2020 · by gexall · in Access to justice, Civil Procedure, Coronavirus, Members Content, Remote hearings

HHJ Gosnell has issued new guidance for civil courts in North and West Yorkshire. It is reproduced in full below.   “Introduction The purpose of this document is to update you on events since my last update on 6th April…

AN ELECTRONIC BUNDLE SHOULD BE CONFINED TO "ESSENTIAL" DOCUMENTS: IT HELPS IF COUNSEL HAS A SAY IN ITS PREPARATION: IMPORTANCE GUIDANCE FROM THE HIGH COURT

AN ELECTRONIC BUNDLE SHOULD BE CONFINED TO “ESSENTIAL” DOCUMENTS: IT HELPS IF COUNSEL HAS A SAY IN ITS PREPARATION: IMPORTANCE GUIDANCE FROM THE HIGH COURT

May 11, 2020 · by gexall · in Bundles, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Remote hearings

In the judgment given this morning in  Tailby , Re TPS Investments (UK) Ltd [2020] EWHC 1135 (Ch) HHJ Cox QC (sitting as a High Court Judge) gave some importance guidance in relation to the preparation and presentation of an…

REMOTE HEARINGS IN FAMILY CASES: A STUDY WORTH READING (BUT PERHAPS NOT ON THE SCREEN...)

REMOTE HEARINGS IN FAMILY CASES: A STUDY WORTH READING (BUT PERHAPS NOT ON THE SCREEN…)

May 6, 2020 · by gexall · in Members Content, Remote hearings, Useful links, Well being

In a remarkably quick amount of time the Nuffield Family Justice Observatory has produced a “rapid consultation” Remote hearings in the family justice system. It is available on a link here. The report is worth reading in full. One point…

APPLICATION TO ADJOURN REMOTE HEARING REFUSED: "Some people are much better at lying than others and that will be no different whether they do so remotely or in court"

APPLICATION TO ADJOURN REMOTE HEARING REFUSED: “Some people are much better at lying than others and that will be no different whether they do so remotely or in court”

May 5, 2020 · by gexall · in Access to justice, Applications, Coronavirus, Members Content, Remote hearings

In the judgment given this morning in A Local Authority v Mother [2020] EWHC 1086 (Fam)  Mrs Justice Lieven considered the recent guidance on remote hearings and refused to adjourn an ongoing hearing. “We have had five days of evidence…

MORE ON REMOTE HEARINGS: THE DANGERS OF INJUSTICE: COURT OF APPEAL DECISION (IT MAY BE DIFFICULT TO DO JUSTICE OVER THE TELEPHONE IN THE COURSE OF A OVER-BUSY LIST)

MORE ON REMOTE HEARINGS: THE DANGERS OF INJUSTICE: COURT OF APPEAL DECISION (IT MAY BE DIFFICULT TO DO JUSTICE OVER THE TELEPHONE IN THE COURSE OF A OVER-BUSY LIST)

April 30, 2020 · by gexall · in Coronavirus, Members Content, Remote hearings

In  B (Children)(Remote Hearing: Interim Care Order) [2020] EWCA Civ 584 the Court of Appeal set out some of the dangers of remote hearings and the need to take considerable care when important decisions are being made. It is also…

The Virtual Workspace: 50 Tips for Effective Video Conferencing: BOOK REVIEW - "BUY" IT QUICKLY...

The Virtual Workspace: 50 Tips for Effective Video Conferencing: BOOK REVIEW – “BUY” IT QUICKLY…

April 27, 2020 · by gexall · in Charity, Civil Procedure, Coronavirus, Members Content, Remote hearings

Andrew King’s book is a testament to the speed at which it is possible for lawyers to act. Just over a fortnight ago Andrew wrote a thread on Twitter setting out his experience of being involved in a virtual trial,…

GUIDANCE FOR THE CONDUCT OF REMOTE COSTS HEARINGS: READ ALL ABOUT IT

GUIDANCE FOR THE CONDUCT OF REMOTE COSTS HEARINGS: READ ALL ABOUT IT

April 23, 2020 · by gexall · in Assessment of Costs, Coronavirus, Costs, Members Content, Remote hearings

The Association of Cost Lawyers has a link on its site to agreed guidance for the Guidance of Remote Hearings. This is designed to ensure that assessments can continue remotely during social isolation.  Litigation Futures has a useful summary of…

REMOTE HEARINGS: ARE THERE "TWO NATIONS" OPERATING WITHIN THE COURT SYSTEM (OR MORE THAN THAT...)

REMOTE HEARINGS: ARE THERE “TWO NATIONS” OPERATING WITHIN THE COURT SYSTEM (OR MORE THAN THAT…)

April 22, 2020 · by gexall · in Coronavirus, Members Content, Remote hearings

The ability of the courts to proceed using remote hearings has to be celebrated. Sometimes, however, it is interesting to contrast the very real technical difficulties being experienced by county courts up and down the country with what appears to…

THE INNS OF COURT COLLEGE OF ADVOCACY: PRINCIPLES FOR REMOTE ADVOCACY

THE INNS OF COURT COLLEGE OF ADVOCACY: PRINCIPLES FOR REMOTE ADVOCACY

April 16, 2020 · by gexall · in Case Management, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Remote hearings, Useful links, Written advocacy

In an extremely short amount of time the Inns of Court College of Advocacy has produced a remarkable guide “Principles for Remote Advocacy”. The document has entered the public domain today, with no restrictions on its use, it is available…

MESSAGE FOR CIRCUIT AND DISTRICT JUDGES FROM THE LORD CHIEF JUSTICE, MASTER OF THE ROLLS AND PRESIDENT OF THE FAMILY DIVISION

MESSAGE FOR CIRCUIT AND DISTRICT JUDGES FROM THE LORD CHIEF JUSTICE, MASTER OF THE ROLLS AND PRESIDENT OF THE FAMILY DIVISION

April 15, 2020 · by gexall · in Civil Procedure, Coronavirus, Members Content, Remote hearings

The Lord Chief Justice, Master of the Rolls and President of the Family Division have sent out a message to civil and family judges.  This has been made generally available.  I provide here highlights of the message, particularly relating to…

COVID-19 and Remote Court Arrangements: 30 tips for dealing with Virtual Hearings: GUEST POST FROM ANDREW KING

COVID-19 and Remote Court Arrangements: 30 tips for dealing with Virtual Hearings: GUEST POST FROM ANDREW KING

April 15, 2020 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil Procedure, Coronavirus, Members Content, Remote hearings

I am grateful to Andrew King from Lennons solicitors for allowing me to reproduce his article on dealing with virtual hearings. This was based on Andrew’s experience of being involved in a three day remote trial.  As you can see…

HMCTS: UPDATED GUIDANCE ON TELEPHONE AND VIDEO HEARINGS DURING THE CORONAVIRUS OUTBREAK

HMCTS: UPDATED GUIDANCE ON TELEPHONE AND VIDEO HEARINGS DURING THE CORONAVIRUS OUTBREAK

April 15, 2020 · by gexall · in Case Management, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Remote hearings

HMCTS has updated its guidance on telephone and video hearings during the coronavirus outbreak.  The guidance is available here.  THE CONTENTS The decision to use telephone and video hearings Using existing technology and making new technology available The rules on…

THE REMOTE ACCESS FAMILY COURT: NOW IN IT'S THIRD EDITION: GUIDANCE ON HEARINGS

THE REMOTE ACCESS FAMILY COURT: NOW IN IT’S THIRD EDITION: GUIDANCE ON HEARINGS

April 9, 2020 · by gexall · in Civil Procedure, Coronavirus, Members Content, Remote hearings

It says a lot that the Remote Access Family Court by Mr Justice MacDonald was in its 3rd version by April 3.  It remains the case that much that is said there is of relevance to non-family practitioners.  For instance…

SKYPE HEARINGS AND APPEALS: COURT OF APPEAL ARE STEPPING ON THE GAS...

SKYPE HEARINGS AND APPEALS: COURT OF APPEAL ARE STEPPING ON THE GAS…

April 8, 2020 · by gexall · in Appeals, Coronavirus, Members Content, Remote hearings

 Teesside Gas Transportation Ltd v Cats North Sea Ltd & Ors [2020] EWCA Civ 503 demonstrated that Court of Appeal hearings can take place remotely.   “I have explained how this hearing was undertaken in an attempt to demonstrate the…

REMOTE HEARINGS AND THE "MacMICRO FRIEND": A NEW LEGAL CONCEPT IS BORN...

REMOTE HEARINGS AND THE “MacMICRO FRIEND”: A NEW LEGAL CONCEPT IS BORN…

April 6, 2020 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Coronavirus, Members Content, Remote hearings

The judgment of Mr Justice Williams in Padero-Mernagh v Mernagh (Divorce: Nullity: Remote Hearing) [2020] EWFC 27 introduces a new legal concept, the ‘MacMicro friend”. In all seriousness this is something that will have to be considered given that family…

COURT OF APPEAL HEAR CASE BY VIDEOCONFERENCING

COURT OF APPEAL HEAR CASE BY VIDEOCONFERENCING

April 2, 2020 · by gexall · in Appeals, Civil Procedure, Coronavirus, Members Content

Fairly soon, I am sure, the holding of hearings remotely will become such a commonplace that they will pass without comment. In the interim, however, it is worthwhile noting that the Court of Appeal heard an appeal on the 26th…

REMOTE HEARINGS (1): HOW ARE THE COURTS COPING? TWO CASES TODAY

REMOTE HEARINGS (1): HOW ARE THE COURTS COPING? TWO CASES TODAY

March 31, 2020 · by gexall · in Access to justice, Civil Procedure, Coronavirus, Members Content, Remote hearings

I hope to keep a running record of how the courts are coping with remote hearings. Two cases reported today provide examples. Telephone used in committal proceedings In  Anwer v Central Bridging Loans Ltd [2020] EWHC 765 (Ch) Mr Justice…

1 2 Next →

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email. Subscription notifies you of a new post, it does not give you access to members' content.

Join 16.8K other subscribers

Recent Posts

  • COST BITES 343: AN OPPORTUNITY HAVE A CLOSE LOOK AT A CASE BEING BUDGETED: “I HAVE NO DOUBT THAT THE OVERALL FIGURE PUT FORWARD IS PRIMA FACIE DISPROPORTIONATE”
  • THROWBACK FRIDAY: MAKING SURE YOU ARE “LEGALLY STREETWISE”: “CLIENT’S MAY SEEK TO TAKE ADVANTAGE OF YOU” (FEBRUARY 2016)
  • COST BITES 342: THE CLAIMANTS’ HYPERBOLIC APPROACH TO ASSESSMENT COST THEM DEARLY: PERSONAL LIABILITY FOR £132,400 FOLLOWING THEIR CHALLENGE OF A BILL OF £147,436.33
  • WHEN THE CLAIMANT IS A SOLICITOR’S FIRM AND THE PROGRESS OF THE CLAIM “HINDERED BY A SERIES OF PROCEDURAL BREACHES”: NOT A GREAT START TO THE ASE
  • AVOIDING THE PITFALLS: PROCEDURAL DEFAULT, SANCTIONS AND OTHER ISSUES THAT CAUSE ACTIONS TO FAIL: WEBINAR 6th FEBRUARY 2026

Top Posts

  • COST BITES 342: THE CLAIMANTS' HYPERBOLIC APPROACH TO ASSESSMENT COST THEM DEARLY: PERSONAL LIABILITY FOR £132,400 FOLLOWING THEIR CHALLENGE OF A BILL OF £147,436.33
  • WHEN THE CLAIMANT IS A SOLICITOR'S FIRM AND THE PROGRESS OF THE CLAIM "HINDERED BY A SERIES OF PROCEDURAL BREACHES": NOT A GREAT START TO THE ASE
  • THROWBACK FRIDAY: MAKING SURE YOU ARE "LEGALLY STREETWISE": "CLIENT'S MAY SEEK TO TAKE ADVANTAGE OF YOU" (FEBRUARY 2016)
  • COST BITES 343: AN OPPORTUNITY HAVE A CLOSE LOOK AT A CASE BEING BUDGETED: "I HAVE NO DOUBT THAT THE OVERALL FIGURE PUT FORWARD IS PRIMA FACIE DISPROPORTIONATE"
  • COURT SETS ASIDE A DECISION THAT A CLAIMANT HAD BREACHED A PEREMPTORY ORDER: THE ORDER WAS NOT DRAFTED "IN THE CLEAREST AND MOST PRECISE LANGUAGE" NECESSARY

Archives

Blogroll

  • Fatal Accident Law
  • Legal Futures
  • Personal injury: Liability and Damages

Books

  • Munkman & Exall on Damages for Personal Injuries and Death 15th ed
  • The APIL Guide to Fatal Accidents 4th edition

Useful Links

  • Buntools (for preparing PDF Bundles)
  • Kings Chambers
  • Kings Chambers Costs & Litigation Funding
  • Kings Chambers Serious Injury
  • The Civil Procedure Rules
  • The Law Society Gazette
  • The National Archives Recently Published Judgments
  • The Senior Court Costs Office Guide 2025
  • www.Bailii.org

Copyright

© Gordon Exall, Exall Legal Training, Civil Litigation Brief, 2013-2026. Unauthorised use and or duplication of the material contained on this blog without permission is strictly prohibited.
Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.

To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
  • Membership Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Advertising Policy
  • Copyright
  • Legal Disclaimer

Copyright © 2026 Civil Litigation Brief

Powered by Big Yellow Workshop

 

Loading Comments...
 

You must be logged in to post a comment.