THE ADVOCATE AS WITNESS: PROCEDURE WHEN A REPRESENTATIVE HAS TO GIVE EVIDENCE
Previous posts have dealt with the problem of defining the line between submissions and evidence – with the dangers that an advocate could be “giving evidence”. However there are circumstances in which an advocate may have to give evidence as…
LIMITATION, PROFESSIONAL NEGLIGENCE AND SUMMARY JUDGMENT: AN IMPORTANT LESSON
The case of Seton House Group -v- Mercer Ltd [2014] EWHC 4234 (Ch) shows the importance of being certain of a limitation period and issuing well before that date. In this case, however, the limitation period had passed well before the…
THE MITCHELL JUDGMENT 3: WHY MR MITCHELL WASN'T TELLING LIES AND P.C. ROWLAND WAS TELLING THE TRUTH
This blog has looked at the fact finding process in the Mitchell judgment several times already. Here I want to look at the issue of the “truth”. This is an issue that has wider implications for those involved in the…
THE MITCHELL JUDGMENT 2: THE ROLE OF DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE
The judgment in the substantive Mitchell case has been examined several times on this blog. Not in relation to political and other ramifications but instead considering the judge’s analysis of the evidence. The previous post looked at the difficulties posed…
MORE ON EVIDENCE AND CAUSATION: A CLINICAL NEGLIGENCE CASE
The previous post dealt with issues of evidence and causation. Similar issues can be seen in the case of Irene Packham -v- Anita Hazari [2014] EWHC 3951 (QB), a decision of Michael Harvey Q.C. The issue of causation and evidence…
STRESS AND THE LITIGATION PROCESS: HOW CAN LAWYERS MAKE MATTERS BETTER?
There is a very useful article in the Solicitors Journal on stress and litigation (to avoid hyperbole I will not use the word “brilliant” but it deserves it.) Hugh Koch analyse the sources of stress for litigants. This made me…
