THE INHERENT JURISDICTION OF THE COURT: FAMILY COURT HAS ALL THE POWERS OF THE HIGH COURT
In a short judgment today in CH v WH [2017] EWHC 2379 (Fam) Mr Justice Mostyn made pointed observations in relation to the innate jurisdiction of the High Court. “The Family Court has all the powers of the High Court.” THE…
EXPERT REPORTS: “CONTENTIONS THAT SHOULD NEVER HAVE BEEN PURSUED AT ALL”
In Maximov v Open Joint Stock Company “Novolipetsky Metallurgichesky Kombinat” [2017] EWHC 1911 (Comm) Sir Michael Burton (sitting as a High Court Judge) commented on the expert evidence in relation to Russian law. The fact that an expert made concessions…
“MULTIPLE SERIOUS ERRORS” IN JUDICIAL DECISION MAKING : THE UPPER TRIBUNAL DECISION IN FULL
The case of AA069062014 & Ors. [2017] UKAITUR AA069062014 has already attracted considerable attention on social media and beyond. The Upper Tribunal (Immigration & Asylum Chamber) considered appeals in 14 cases. The major issue was the tribunal judge. Here are the…
BUDGETS, ASSUMPTIONS AND AGREEMENT: GUIDANCE FROM THE BENCH: PRECEDENT R WILL HELP YOU OUT IF YOU EVER WANT TO DEPART FROM THE BUDGET
I have already paid homage to the Solicitors Journal. The articles in the last edition show how much it contributed . Given the inability of the SJ to draw attention to itself I draw everyone’s attention to the article by…
SIGNING A STATEMENT OF TRUTH ON BEHALF OF A CLIENT: A STARK REMINDER FROM THE COUNTY COURT ONLINE PILOT PRACTICE DIRECTION
I have looked before at the issues that arise when the legal representative signs a statement of truth on behalf of a client. These issues are shown in stark terms in the Practice Direction 51S – The County Court Online…
GOODBYE TO THE SOLICITORS JOURNAL: PERSONAL MEMORIES:
The Solicitors Journal has published its last edition after 160 years. I was a SJ columnist for around 10% of that time. It brings back some memories. “The reality of the alleged want of a journal which shall distinctively represent…
WHEN A JUDGMENT STARTS “OH DEAR, OH DEAR, OH DEAR”: CAR CRASHES AND MOTORWAY PILE UPS IN THE UPPER TRIBUNAL: UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE RENDERED SPEECHLESS
This blog sometimes looks at tribunal decisions, primarily in the context of procedural issues. These issues abound in the decision of Upper Tribunal judge Nicholas Wikeley in AF v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (DLA) (No2) (Tribunal procedure and…
ABSENCE OF RISK ASSESSMENTS LEADS TO JUDGMENT FOR DEFENDANT BEING OVERTURNED: THE SECOND PART OF POWELL -v- WATFORD BOROUGH COUNCIL
The first part of the decision of Mr Justice Jay in Powell -v- Watford Borough Council [2017] EWHC 2283 (QB)was considered in detail in the previous post. Mr Justice Jay held that a peremptory order had not been complied with and the defence…
NON-COMPLIANCE WITH PEREMPTORY ORDERS: THE FULL JUDGMENT IN POWELL -v- WATFORD BOROUGH COUNCIL
I have written before about the judgment of Mr Justice Jay in Powell -v- Watford Borough Council [2017] EWHC 2283 (QB). The full transcript has now become available. It deals with an important point about the need to follow the…
WHY DISTRICT JUDGES SOMETIMES NEED THE PATIENCE OF SEVERAL SAINTS
In a recent case Mr Justice Kerr said, of employment judges “Employment Judges sometimes have to have the patience of a saint to do their job and are appointed because they are considered to have it, among other reasons.”* Those…
ORDER FOR PAYMENT ON ACCOUNT DOES NOT NEED TO BE MADE AT THE HEARING ITSELF
The judgment of Master Matthews in Ashman v Thomas [2016] EWHC 1810 (Ch) has only recently arrived on BAILLI. It contains several important practice points in relation to payments on account of costs. THE CASE After the trial of a preliminary…
THE NEW PRE-ACTION PROTOCOL FOR DEBT CLAIMS: LINKS AND COMMENTARY
A new Pre-Action Protocol for debt claims comes into force on the 1st October 2017. Here are links to the Protocol itself and commentary on the Protocol. THE PROTOCOL The protocol itself is available in full here ARTICLES AND COMMENTARY…
SERVICE ON SOLICITORS: A REMARKABLE VIEW LEADS TO MAJOR MISTAKE: THE LAW SUMMARISED
I have already written today about the decision in Higgins & Ors v ERC Accountants & Business Advisers Ltd [2017] EWHC 2190 (Ch). I want to isolate one element of that case that relates to the remarkable view that the claimants’ solicitor…
ANOTHER MONTH, ANOTHER DECISION ON NON-SERVICE OF THE CLAIM FORM: THE RESULT OF A “NEGLIGENT OR INCOMPETENT ERROR”
In Higgins & Ors v ERC Accountants & Business Advisers Ltd [2017] EWHC 2190 (Ch) His Honour Judge Pelling (sitting as a High Court judge) considered a number of issues relating to service of the claim form. It is another example…
PROVISIONAL DAMAGES NOT AWARDED FOR RISK OF DETERIORATION IN PSYCHOLOGICAL CONDITION
In XX v Whittington Hospital NHS Trust [2017] EWHC 2318 (QB) Sir Robert Nelson considered the question of whether provisional damages should be awarded in relation to a possible deterioration in a claimant’s psychological condition. The fact that the deterioration was…
SENSIBLE CONCESSIONS PLAY NO PART IN THE ORDERING OF INDEMNITY COSTS: ORDER MADE ON MERIT
I have written about the substantive judgment in Imperial Chemical Industries Limited -v- Merit Merrell Technology Limited [2017] EWHC 1763 (TCC) several times already. There is a shorter judgment on costs at Imperial Chemical Industries Ltd v Merit Merrell Technology Ltd [2017] EWHC…
PROVING THINGS 67: THE DIFFICULTIES WHEN WITNESSES DEPARTS FROM THEIR WITNESS STATEMENT: MULTIPLE INCONSISTENCIES DAMAGE CREDIBILITY
I am grateful to my colleague Colm Nugent for sending me a copy of the decision in Baker -v- British Gas Services (Commercial) Limited [2017] EWHC 2302. Amanda Yip QC (sitting as a Deputy Judge of the High Court*), considered…
IS THE BUDGET DEFINITIVE ON ASSESSMENT? CASE IDENTIFIED: TWO TRAINS OF THOUGHT CONTINUE
The position of the status of the budget and hourly rates is in flux. Michael Fletcher earlier posted an article reporting an assessment he took part in where District Judge Lumb (sitting as the Regional Costs Judge in Birmingham) expressly disagreed…
WHEN ONE EXPERT TELLS THE OTHER EXPERT TO “GO BACK TO SCHOOL”: CASES ON CONDUCT AND THE MEETING OF EXPERTS
The case of Hatfield -v- Drax Power Ltd (18/08/2017)* highlights some of the issues that arise in the meeting of experts. The meeting is an important stage in many types of action, however the case law and rules relating to it…
AN EXPERT REPORT THAT WAS “EXTRAORDINARY IN ITS PRESENTATION AND SHOT THROUGH WITH BREATH TAKING ARROGANCE”: THIS DOESN’T END WELL
Problems caused by expert witnesses feature heavily on this blog. I am grateful to barrister Brian McCluggage for sending me a copy of the decision of Her Honour Judge Belcher in Hatfield -v- Drax Power Ltd (18/08/2017) which contains robust…
COSTS ORDERS AGAINST NON-PARTIES: THE RELEVANT PRINCIPLES CONSIDERED AND APPLIED
In Montpelier Business Reorganisation Ltd v Jones & Ors [2017] EWHC 2273 (QB) His Honour Judge Saffman (sitting as a judge of the High Court) considered the issue of costs against non-parties. The principles relating to non-party order were considered and…
ASKED TO SIGN A GUARANTEE: WORDS OF WISDOM
It is rare for a judgment to include clear guidance to the public on how to avoid problems. However this can be found in the judgment of Mr Justice Max Barrett in AIB Plc. -v- Rostaff Property Development Limited & ors…
ANOTHER CLAIM FORM CASE: PUTTING IN THE POST ON REQUISITE DATE IS GOOD SERVICE: NO SAFE HARBOUR FOR DEFENDANTS ON THIS ISSUE
Master McCloud has already made observations about the ” dry and unlovely crop of procedural service issues” that are regularly coming before the Masters. Another issue was considered in Jones v Chichester Harbour Conservancy & Ors [2017] EWHC 2270. “… the correct…
CLAIMANT’S PART 36 OFFERS AND LATE ACCEPTANCE: SOME JUDGES WILL, SOME JUDGES WON’T…
There have been numerous cases which have considered the appropriate approach of the courts when there is late acceptance by a defendant of a claimant’s Part 36 offer. Some of these have been considered on this blog, but by…
BUNDLES TOO BIG, SKELETON ARGUMENTS TOO LONG – THEN THE COURT MAY SIMPLY REFUSE TO ACCEPT THEM: PREPARATION FOR HEARING GOES OFF THE TRACKS
The problems caused by over-lengthy skeleton arguments and voluminous bundles feature regularly on this blog. They are, in fact, some of the most widely read posts on the blog. I do not have to go looking for cases on these…
FACT FINDING FOR LAWYERS : HOLIDAY CLAIMS: SRA GUIDANCE – NOT A WALK ON THE BEACH
The Solicitors Regulation Authority has issued a specific warning notice in relation to holiday sickness claims. The notice, issued on the 6th September 2017, contains important guidance in relation to the role of the solicitor in investigating facts. The guidance…
RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS FOLLOWING BREACH OF A PEREMPTORY ORDER: APPLICATION REFUSED: A WORKING HOLIDAY IS NO EXCUSE
In The Financial Conduct Authority v Da Vinci Invest Ltd & Ors [2017] EWHC 2220 (Ch) Mr Justice Snowden rejected a defendant’s application for relief from sanctions for breach of a peremptory order. It is unusual in that the court considered…
CHAMPERTY AND MAINTENANCE CONSIDERED: THE DEFENDANT WAS CRYING WOLF
In Casehub Ltd v Wolf Cola Ltd [2017] EWHC 1169 (Ch) Stuart Isaacs QC (sitting as a Deputy High Court Judge) rejected an argument that a claimant bringing assigned claims amounted to champerty or maintenance. It is rare for these issues…
WITNESSES, STATEMENTS AND LAWYERS – “SELF PROTECTION”: A QUICK RECAP
Sometimes, quite often in fact, clients need “protecting” from lawyers who are preparing witness statements on their behalf. I have dealt with this in previous posts and will write on this again in the near future. However here I want…
SERVICE OF PROCEEDINGS WITHOUT PERMISSION: THE COURT HAS POWER TO RECTIFY THE POSITION RETROSPECTIVELY
Can the court rectify the situation when a claimant, who requires permission to continue proceedings, has issued and served without such permission? That was the question considered by His Honour Judge Davis-White QC in Wilton UK Ltd v Shuttleworth & Ors…
THE DUTIES OF A SOLICITOR IN LITIGATION: NO DUTY TO TEMPT THE CLIENT TO PURSUE LARGE SUMS: ADVERTISING “TURNED THE CLIENT’S HEAD” AND LED TO INCORRECT ASSERTIONS
In Thomas v Hugh James Ford Simey Solicitors [2017] EWCA Civ 1303 the Court of Appeal considered the extent of a solicitor’s duty and retainer. It is significant in that it: States that the courts should approach the issue of fixed…
RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS GRANTED: COMPLICATIONS WHEN ACTION AFFECTS PEOPLE NOT PARTIES TO THE ACTION
In Singh & Ors v The Charity Commission & Ors [2017] EWHC 2183 (Ch) His Honour Judge Purle QC granted relief from sanctions. The default was serious and significant and there was no good reason. The judge was faced with…
NO SPECIAL FORM OF “MEDIATION PRIVILEGE”: MEDIATION AGREEMENT DID NOT OVERRIDE GENERAL PRINCIPLES PREVENTING WITHOUT PREJUDICE COMMUNICATION BEING USED A A FORM OF BLACKMAIL
The decision of Mrs Justice Rose in Interactive Technology Corporation Ltd v Ferster & Ors [2015] EWHC 3895 (Ch) considers the issue of “mediation privilege”. This is not a new case (the judgment was dated 21st December 2015) however it has…
YOU’VE SPENT £625,000 IN COSTS AND GOT NO FURTHER FORWARD: COSTS AFTER UNSUCCESSFUL SUMMARY JUDGMENT APPLICATION
In Burnden Holdings (UK) Ltd & Anor v Fielding & Anor [2017] EWHC 2118 (Ch) His Honour Judge Hodge QC (sitting as a Judge of the High Court) considered the issue of costs after the claimants’ unsuccessful application for summary judgment….
THROWING EVERYTHING IN AT TRIAL- INCLUDING THE KITCHEN CABINET: YOU HAVE TO PUT YOUR CASE (AND PLEAD IT)
There are some important observations in the judgment of Mr Justice Henry Carr in Neptune (Europe) Ltd v Devol Kitchens Ltd [2017] EWHC 2172 (Pat) about the need to plead and put a case at trial. An attempt to introduce a…
EXPERT WITNESS GIVEN “NO WEIGHT AT ALL”: FAILURE TO DISCLOSE A CONFLICT OF INTEREST
There are some interesting passages in the judgment of David Stone (sitting as a Deputy High Court Judge) in Technomed Ltd & Anor v Bluecrest Health Screening Ltd & Anor [2017] EWHC 2142 (Ch). Here we look at the judgment…
“ROBUST” BUT NOT GRATUITOUSLY OFFENSIVE:” SRA GUIDANCE ON COMMUNICATIONS WITH OTHER FIRMS AND LITIGANTS IN PERSON: THE FUTILITY OF RUDENESS
The Solicitors Regulatory Authority has issued guidance today on “Offensive communications” It gives me a chance to recap on earlier posts about the futility of rudeness. “Your role is to act in the client’s best interests; antagonising the other side…
SOMETIMES YOU DON’T HAVE TO SIGN STATEMENTS OF CASE WITH A STATEMENT OF TRUTH: HIGH COURT DECISION ON AMENDING PARTICULARS OF CLAIM
The case of Kimathi v Foreign and Commonwealth Office [2017] EWHC 2145 (QB) promises to be a legal epic. As I understand it the trial is not even half way through. It was opened in April 2017. It is unlikely…
CLINICAL NEGLIGENCE AND INSURANCE COSTS: POLICY OF £10,000 WAS BOTH REASONABLE AND PROPORTIONAL: HIGH COURT DECISION
In Mitchell v Gilling-Smith [2017] EWHC B18 (Costs) Master Leonard held that a £10,000 premium incurred in a clinical negligence case was reasonable and proportional. It also highlights the importance of a paying party bringing actual evidence to court if they…
PROVING THINGS 66: IT ALL COMES DOWN TO THE CREDIBILITY OF WITNESSES: WHERE THERE’S A WILL THERE’S A WAY
This blog regularly looks at cases in which trial judges assess the credibility of witnesses. Here I want to look at the careful analysis of witness evidence by HHJ Paul Matthews (sitting as a High Court judge) in Legg & Anor…
WITNESS STATEMENTS “INADMISSIBLE”: CONTAINED “SUBJECTIVE INTENTION”, “OPINION” AND “LEGAL ARGUMENT”: ANOTHER EXAMPLE
A brief passage under the judgment of Mr Justice Arnold in Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Ltd v Fougera Sweden Holding 2 AB [2017] EWHC 1995 (Ch) serves to show how much “witness evidence” served by a litigant can, in fact, be inadmissible….
IS THE BUDGET DEFINITIVE ON ASSESSMENT? MORE CATS, MORE PIGEONS: THERE ARE NOW TWO TRAINS OF THOUGHT ON THE HOURLY RATE
Earlier this month I blogged on the decision in RNB v London Borough of Newham [2017] EWHC B15 (Costs). Deputy Master Campbell decided that the hourly rate could be challenged at the assessment stage even if the total of a particular…
WITNESS EVIDENCE: THE DANGERS OF OPINION EVIDENCE AND TRYING TO USURP THE ROLE OF THE JUDGE : BACK TO MARSH -v- MINISTRY OF DEFENCE
Anyone considering matters relating to witness evidence and the drafting of statements will be drawn like a moth to the fire to the decision of Lady Justice Thirwall in Marsh -v- Ministry of Justice [2017] EWHC 1040. Once again I am returning…
THE DUTY TO PUT YOUR CASE : FINDINGS MADE ON KEY POINTS WHICH WERE NOT PUT TO THE WITNESS OVERTURNED ON APPEAL
In Chen v Ng (British Virgin Islands) [2017] UKPC 27 the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council considered the extent of the duty to put a case to a witness. It is a reminder of the importance of putting a case…
DEFENDANT DEBARRED FROM CALLING WITNESS EVIDENCE AT TRIAL: COURT OF APPEAL OVERTURNS FINDING FOR DEFENDANT
The case of Durrant -v- Chief Constable of Avon & Somerset Constabulary is a long-running saga. We have looked at it twice before. The incident occurred in 2009. In 2013 the Court of Appeal overturned a judge’s decision to grant…
ANOTHER SERVICE CASE: AVOIDING THE PROCESS SERVER CAN LEAD TO AN ORDER THAT ALTERNATIVE METHOD IS GOOD SERVICE
I resolved not to write about service of the claim form cases for a while. However the cases keep coming through. CPR 6.15(2) allows the court to order that steps already taken to bring the claim form to attention of…
WRITING TO THE COURT UNILATERALLY (AGAIN) – PROCEDURAL FAIRNESS AND WHY JUDGES NEED THE PATIENCE OF A SAINT
I have no plans to expand this blog to cover issues relating to procedure in Employment Tribunals. However there are certain passages of the judgment of Mr Justice Kerr in Jones v The Secretary of State for Business Innovation &…
ANOTHER LATE COSTS BUDGET: RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS GRANTED TO ERRANT DEFENDANTS WHO SERVED BUDGET 10 DAYS LATE
In Mott & Anor v Long & Anor [2017] EWHC 2130 (TCC) His Honour Judge Grant (sitting as a judge of the High Court) considered a relief from sanctions application in relation to defendants who had served a costs budget ten…
SERVICE ON A NOMINATED SOLICITOR: BE CLEAR WHO YOU REPRESENT: “A THOROUGHLY TECHNICAL POINT”, UNATTRACTIVE, MISCONCEIVED AND “REFLECTS NO CREDIT ON THE INSURERS OR THEIR ADVISERS”
Earlier this week Master McCloud commented upon “a dry and unlovely crop of procedural service issues” in the Masters’ Corridor. These issues may well follow the Masters around. Master Davison sits as a Recorder. In that capacity he decided an…
COPYING THE OTHER SIDE INTO CORRESPONDENCE WITH THE COURT: A RECAP AND REVIEW OF THE EARLIER CASE MENTIONED
I am writing, again, about the the judgment of Mr Justice Kerr in Topping v Ralph Tristees Ltd [2017] EWHC 1954 (QB). The point the case makes about the correct route of appeal has been commented on, however I had not anticipated…
You must be logged in to post a comment.