THIS CASE SHOULD HAVE BEEN ISSUED IN CARDIFF; HEARD IN THE COUNTY COURT AND THERE SHOULD HAVE BEEN A SPLIT TRIAL: HIGH COURT ISSUES A WARNING

We are returning to the judgment of Mr Justice Cotter in Boyd v Hughes [2025] EWHC 435 (KB).  At the conclusion of the judgment there is a very clear warning that this case: (i) should not have been issued in the High Court; (ii) should not have been issued in London; (iii) should have been heard in...

Enjoying this post?

Become a Civil Litigation Brief member to read full articles and access all premium content.

Become a member

Already a member? Log in below