THROWBACK FRIDAY:"WITNESS STATEMENTS: WHEN THINGS GO WRONG BLAME THE SOLICITOR" (SEPTEMBER 2016)

Here we are looking at a post from September 2016 on an issue that remains extremely current. When a witness statement is found to be inaccurate that witness will often blame their solicitor, or the person responsible for drafting the…

SHOULD THE COURT ORDER PRE-ACTION DISCLOSURE? THE JURISDICTIONAL REQUIREMENTS ARE NOT SATISFIED AND THE COURT WOULD NOT EXERCISE ITS DISCRETION IN ANY EVENT

This is the first of two posts today about applications for pre-action disclosure. The applicants were, eventually, unsuccessful in each.  Here the judge found that the applicants had not met the first jurisdictional requirement for disclosure. Even if they had…

DO YOU WANT TO BECOME A HOUSING LAW BLOGGER? NEARLY LEGAL REQUIRES A TEAM OF WRITERS

I wrote earlier this year about the sad death of Giles Peaker the revered blogger on Housing Law.   The blog “Nearly Legal” is, I am glad to saying, continuing. However, such was Giles’ work rate a team of writers is…

"ALL DOCUMENTS HAD AT LEAST TWO NUMBERS AND TECHNICALLY 3 IN SOME CASES": A SMALL POINT ABOUT BUNDLES AND NUMBERING

For several years a post on bundles and “Sedley’s Laws” was the most read post on this site.  Ever since then the preparation, presentation and numbering of bundles for applications and trials have formed a regular part of the material…

We look again at the award of indemnity costs in the Associated Newspaper case.  The reasons for this were manifold. However there were two important factors relating to the statements of case.  Firstly the case was pleaded far too widely;…

EXPERT WATCH 66:  RED FLAGS AND EXPERTS (1) :THE DUTY TO CONSIDER THE RANGE OF OPINIONS: OFTEN "HONOURED IN THE BREACH"; OFTEN FATAL TO A PARTY'S CASE

This short series is looking at how you can spot “red flags” when looking at an expert report.  There are often aspects of reports that “don’t fare well” when put under scrutiny at trial. “His response was that he usually…

WITNESS EVIDENCE WEDNESDAY: RED FLAGS AND WITNESS STATEMENTS (1):  THE WITNESS THAT GIVES THE COURT THEIR OPINION

We have below a series of posts about the dangers of putting “opinion” evidence into witness statements.  It has been a constant theme on this site for, at least, 12 years. There is no sign of this abating.  Attempts have…

COST BITES 436: THE DEFENDANT FAILED TO BEAT THE CLAIMANT'S PART 36 OFFER: WAS IT UNJUST FOR THE USUAL CONSEQUENCES TO APPLY? THE IMPORTANCE OF INTEREST

Here we look at a judgment where the court considered an argument that the claimant had not beaten its own Part 36 offer.  The judge held that the defendant’s argument fell at the first post because it failed to take…