WHEN CHAT GPT DRAFTED A “SKELETON” ARGUMENT – 300 PAGES AND 132,000 WORDS LONG: THE LITIGANT RETAINS RESPONSIBILITY AND MUST COMPLY WITH THE RULES
We have here another example, in a judgment today, of the difficulties caused by the use of AI. ChatGPT “helpfully” drafted a “skeleton” argument that was 300 pages long (the maximum page length allowed was 20 pages). This was coupled…
ADVISING THE CLIENT OF THE RISKS OF LITIGATION: TEN USEFUL CHECKLISTS COUPLED WITH THE RELEVANT LINKS
The previous post considered the nature of a solicitor’s duty in a conveyancing transaction. The judgment considered the nature of the solicitor’s duty to warn of risks. Here we pull together many posts and cases on advising on the risks…
WITNESS EVIDENCE WEDNESDAY: THOSE WHO DRAFTED THE WITNESS STATEMENTS “HAVE FORGOTTEN WHAT THE ROLE OF THE WITNESS STATEMENT IS”: A USEFUL CHECKLIST AND LINKS TO KEEP YOU ON THE STRAIGHT AND NARROW
Here we look at a case where the judge was extremely blunt in his critique of the way in which both parties had drafted the witness statements. The judgment was from a few years back. However we are looking at…
SERVICE POINTS 54: THE CLAIMANT FAILED TO SERVE A SEALED CLAIM FORM IN TIME: THERE WAS NO OBLIGATION ON A DEFENDANT TO MAKE AN APPLICATION UNDER CPR 7.7: THE ACTION BITES THE DUST
Here we have a case where the claimant simply failed to serve a sealed claim form in time. Despite being warned of this by the defendant the claimant insisted that service of an unsealed claim form was sufficient. The claimant…
THE DIFFICULTIES WHEN MAKING A CLAIM FOR LOSS OF EARNINGS OF THE SELF-EMPLOYED OR SOMEONE INVOLVED IN SPORTS OR ENTERTAINMENT: WEBINAR 29TH SEPTEMBER 2026
Claims for loss of earnings become particularly difficult when the claimant is not an employee. The court may have to reconstruct the likely progress of a business, professional practice, sporting career or career in the arts. Past income may fluctuate…
THE CURRENT IMPORTANCE OF PLEADINGS 91 : THE COURT FINDS FOR THE CLAIMANT ON A POINT NOT PLEADED: THE IMPORTANCE OF THE STATEMENT OF THE AGREED ISSUES FOR TRIAL
The previous post looked at the costs consequences of a claimant pleading a case on a wide basis and then succeeding on the basis of a case that was not specifically pleaded. It is worthwhile looking at the judgment on…
LAWYERS AND ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AVOIDING THE PITFALLS (5): “THE HEARING WAS A SALUTARY LESSON IN HOW AI MAY PROMPT LAY PERSONS TO SAY THE RIGHT THINGS IN PLEADINGS, BUT CANNOT FURNISH THE EVIDENCE NEEDED TO ESTABLISH THOSE STATEMENTS”
This morning we are travelling to Scotland to look at a case where the judge indicated that the use of AI had led the pursuers (claimants) to bring forward a claim that was largely unsupported by evidence. This led to…
A COURT SETS ASIDE AN ORDER MADE WITHOUT NOTICE: ANOTHER CASE THAT EMPHASISES THE IMPORTANCE OF FAIR PRESENTATION AT THESE APPLICATIONS: A LAWYER CANNOT SIMPLY PROMOTE A “CONSPIRACY THEORY” BUT MOST ACT OBJECTIVELY AND CAREFULLY
We have looked many times at cases where “without notice” applications have come under fire. In particular in relation to arguments that the applicants have failed in their duty of full and frank disclosure to the court. We see that…
THE REPLY: THE THEME OF THE DAY: SIX USEFUL CHECKLISTS: MAKING SURE YOUR PLEADING DOESN’T FAIL THE BASIC TESTS
A post earlier today promised checklists on the essential elements that need to be considered when drafting a Reply. There are six here (we will deal with drafting a Defence to counterclaim separately). These should be useful in relation to…
DRAFTING A DEFENCE TO COUNTERCLAIM: SOME IMPORTANT POINTS: YOU HAVE TO COMPLY WITH CPR 16 AND DO IT FULLY AND PROPERLY
The posts earlier today dealt with service and the drafting of a Reply. They emphasised that a Defence to Counterclaim is wholly different from a Reply.A Reply is generally optional. A Defence to Counterclaim is not.A party that fails to…
DRAFTING A REPLY: WHAT IT SHOULD CONTAIN AND WHAT IT SHOULD NOT: THE KEY ISSUES CONSIDERED
You may have noted that the theme of today is the Reply. Here we look at how a Reply should be drafted if a decision is made that one should be served. “A Reply should not, however, be used to…
BACK TO BASICS MONDAY: THE RIGHT TO REPLY: WHEN MUST YOU DO IT AND WHEN SHOULD YOU DO IT? THE CRITICAL IMPORTANCE OF A DEFENCE TO COUNTERCLAIM
There are a surprising number of cases that deal with the drafting of a Reply. Today we are having a detailed look of the rules and case law relating to the Reply. Here we take a look at the rules…
THE IMPORTANCE OF MAKING AN APPLICATION TO EXTEND TIME BEFORE THE DATE OF COMPLIANCE: THE COURT DOES NOT CONSIDER DENTON PRINCIPLES EVEN IF THE APPLICANT FAILS TO MEET THEIR OWN PROPOSED TIMETABLE
What is the situation if a party seeks a prospective application of time for compliance but, whilst the application is pending, does not act by the date they proposed? Is this still and “in-time” application? Should it be treated any…
THROWBACK FRIDAY: ADVISING CLIENTS AS TO THE RISKS OF LITIGATION: “CLIENTS WANT TWO INCONSISTENT THINGS”: CASES AND GUIDANCE (SEPTEMBER 2018)
Some things are timeless in litigation. The fact that it carries risks is without doubt one of those things. Here we look at a post that considered the duty to advise on the risks of litigation and how to fulfil…
MORE ABOUT THE CASE AGAINST A SOLICITOR BEING STRUCK OUT: THE ABSENCE OF AN ASSUMPTION OF RESPONSIBILITY MEANT THERE WAS NO CASE: A CLAIMANT CANNOT HOPE THAT “SOMETHING WILL TURN UP” ON DISCLOSURE…
We looked at this case earlier today in relation to the procedural aspects. However the substantive judgment, on which the defendant was successful, is of considerable interest to the legal profession generally. There are also issues as to how the…
WILL AN INSURER PAY FOR THIS? ONE OF THE MOST ESSENTIAL QUESTIONS IN LITIGATION CONSIDERED: WEBINAR 30th OCTOBER 2026
The post earlier this week on the claimant’s inability to use TUPE to bring a claim against a defendant highlights the very real difficulties that exist when there is no defendant who can pay the claim. In that case the…
CLAIM AGAINST A SOLICITOR WAS STRUCK OUT: THERE HAD BEEN NUMEROUS PROCEDURAL DEFAULTS AND THESE WOULD HAVE BEEN FORGIVEN…
We are looking at a case where a claim against a defendant solicitor was struck out. It was struck out because there was no arguable case against the solicitor. However the claimants had also breached numerous rules before and after…
LAWYERS AND ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AVOIDING THE PITFALLS (4): EXPERTS AND THE USE OF AI: A LOT OF DANGER AREAS HERE: 20 KEY POINTS
Here we consider the risks that occur when experts use AI when they prepare a report or give evidence. We have seen several examples on this blog of evidence going awry. Here we draw upon guidance from previous posts, but…
LAWYERS AND ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AVOIDING THE PITFALLS (3): AI AND WITNESS EVIDENCE: VERY DANGEROUS BEDFELLOWS: TWENTY KEY POINTS
We have looked several times at the dangers of using Artificial Intelligence to draft witness statements. It would be naive to believe that this issue is not going to arise again. Indeed it may well already be a common feature…
COST BITES 447 : SHOULD A DEFENDANT’S DERAILMENT OF AN EARLY NEUTRAL EVALUATION LEAD TO INDEMNITY COSTS ORDERS BEING MADE AGAINST IT?
Here we have an interesting judgment on the interaction between costs, pleadings and the court’s encouragement of an ADR Process. The claimant argued that a defendant’s conduct lead to the adjournment, and eventual abandonment of an Early Neutral Evaluation (“ENE”)….
LAWYERS AND ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AVOIDING THE PITFALLS (2): HOW TO SPOT “FALSE” AUTHORITIES AND WHAT TO DO ABOUT IT (PLUS SOME USEFUL LINKS)
Many practising lawyers will now have seen cases where AI has been used to put forward legal propositions. Sometimes this involves “hallucinated” cases, statutes or rules. More problematically a real case or statute is cited, however the citation is wrong…
BACK TO BASICS MONDAY: LAWYERS AND ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE (1): THREE IMPORTANT PRINCIPLES: YOU OWN THE WORK; AI IS NOT AN AUTHORITATIVE SOURCE OF LAW; IT IS NOT ENOUGH THAT THE CASE EXISTS…
The post earlier today on the misuse of AI when defending an SDT hearing has led me to start a short series about the dangers of lawyers (litigators in particular) using AI. This is not an anti-AI stance. There is…
MORE ON THE USE OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND “HALLUCINATING” CASE LAW AND LEGAL PRINCIPLES: THE SOLICITORS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL GIVES A CLEAR VIEW…
We have now looked at numerous court cases where lawyers have come to grief because of the use of Artificial Intelligence to cite law incorrectly, or simply manufacture false cases and equally false legal principles and citations. Here we have…
WEBINAR ON PERIODICAL PAYMENTS AND PROVISIONAL DAMAGES: 9th SEPTEMBER 2026: USEFUL GUIDANCE, CHECKLISTS AND QUESTIONNAIRES
This webinar provides a practical and up-to-date analysis of the law and practice relating to provisional damages and periodical payments in personal injury litigation. It begins with a review of recent case law, including a professional negligence claim arising from…
THROWBACK FRIDAY:”WITNESS STATEMENTS: WHEN THINGS GO WRONG BLAME THE SOLICITOR” (SEPTEMBER 2016)
Here we are looking at a post from September 2016 on an issue that remains extremely current. When a witness statement is found to be inaccurate that witness will often blame their solicitor, or the person responsible for drafting the…
DEALING WITH FISH FILES, PROCRASTINATION AND DELAY: THE LITIGATOR’S FRIEND: A REMINDER OF USEFUL LINKS, POSTS AND GUIDANCE AND SOME USEFUL CHECKLISTS
Many of the problem areas of litigation we look at regularly (possibly daily) are often the result of human error. Sometimes there are mistakes as to substantive law, more often there are mistakes as to procedure. One major theme is…
COST BITES 445: “AN APPALLING WASTE OF RESOURCES FOR WHICH BOTH PARTIES AND THEIR REPRESENTATIVES BEAR RESPONSIBILITY”: THE FAMILY COURT IS NOT BEST PLEASED…
Here we take a look at a judgment in a family case which contains an exhortation about running up unnecessary costs. This is normally a regime in which inter partes costs are not awarded. The conduct in this case led…
ADVOCACY THE JUDGE’S VIEW SERIES 4: A RECAP OF THE PREVIOUS SERIES AND THE DEADLY SINS OF ADVOCATES: DON’T BE CONFUSING OR BORING
The fourth series on the Judge’s views of advocacy only had two posts. The second post in the series consisted of a tweet from an (anonymous) judge “Get to the Point Quickly”. The first in the series contained a…
THROWBACK FRIDAY: “THE RISK OF INDEMNITY COSTS: WHAT ARE YOU GOING TO TELL YOUR CLIENT?” (AUGUST 2014)
We have had four posts this month along about costs being awarded on the indemnity basis. Indemnity costs have been awarded against claimants, (in a very high profile case), against defendants, and against a solicitor personally. The consequences of an…
INSURER’S APPLICATION TO COMMIT STRUCK OUT AS AN ABUSE OF PROCESS: LITIGATION IS NOT CONDUCTED ON THE BASIS THAT, NOTWITHSTANDING THE ABSENCE OF EVIDENCE, A PARTY MAY BE ABLE TO PUT MATTERS RIGHT AT SOMETIME IN THE FUTURE…
In this case an insurer’s application to commit a personal injury claimant to prison was struck out. This was because the insurer applicant failed to satisfy the court that it had any right to bring the action in the name…
THE CURRENT IMPORTANCE OF PLEADINGS 89: AN APPELLANT CANNOT PURSUE AN UNPLEADED “NEW, NEW CASE”: APPEAL IN CASE AGAINST SOLICITORS WAS “WASTEFUL OF TIME AND RESOURCES”
This is a case that started off as a consideration of the way in which a defendant firm of solicitors adduced evidence to support assertions that there was a history of fraud in motor accident claims. The appellants here, the…
“ALL DOCUMENTS HAD AT LEAST TWO NUMBERS AND TECHNICALLY 3 IN SOME CASES”: A SMALL POINT ABOUT BUNDLES AND NUMBERING
For several years a post on bundles and “Sedley’s Laws” was the most read post on this site. Ever since then the preparation, presentation and numbering of bundles for applications and trials have formed a regular part of the material…
THE DANGERS OF SUING A DISSOLVED COMPANY WHICH HAS BEEN RESTORED TO THE REGISTER: COURT REFUSES TO EXTEND TIME BEYOND THE PERIOD OF DISSOLUTION
Here we have an important judgement pointing out that, in effect, the limitation period starts running again once a company is restored to the register. The court cannot grant an order under the Companies Act which extends limitation beyond the…
ACCOMMODATION AND APPLIANCE CLAIMS: THE CASES SINCE SWIFT -v- CARPENTER: WEBINAR 3rd SEPTEMBER 2026
This webinar examines the legal and practical issues arising in accommodation and aids and appliances claims in personal injury litigation, with particular focus on the impact of Swift v Carpenter. The decision represents a significant development in how courts assess…
EXPERT WATCH 68: THE MISUSE OF AI: “CREATE ME AN EXCEPTIONAL EXPERT WITNESS REPORT”: SHOW HOW MY CLIENT “IS 0% AT FAULT”: THIS WITNESS HAD A FEW PROBLEMS…
“What happens in America eventually happens over here” is a well known maxim. It is for that reason we are looking at a case about expert evidence and the use of artificial intelligence from the United States. (To be frank…
APPELLANT HAS £2.8 MILLION APPEAL STRUCK OUT: RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS REFUSED: THE DANGERS OF INACTIVITY: “THE SERIOUSNESS OF THE CONSEQUENCES CANNOT DETERMINE THE OUTCOME”
Here we see case where an appellant lost the chance to pursue an appeal worth £2.8 million primarily because of a failure to appoint new representatives or inform the Tribunal of details of how he could be contacted. Inactivity led…
EXPERT WATCH 67: LITIGANTS NOT ALLOWED TO RECOVER THE COSTS OF AN EXPERT WHOSE EVIDENCE ON SOME ISSUES WAS “LARGELY UNHELPFUL”
It is rare to be able to see a costs decision on the recoverability of the costs of expert evidence. We have such a case here where the Competition Appeal Tribunal considered whether to allow a successful party to recover…
COST BITES 442: AN IMPORTANT POINT TO WATCH WHEN SEEKING TO RECOVER COSTS ON A COUNTERCLAIM
Here we look at an important point in relation to the costs of a counterclaim. If a party is awarded the costs of the counterclaim those costs may be very narrowly confined. In this case the defendant attempted to recover…
COST BITES 441: NO ORDER FOR COSTS – EVEN THOUGH THE APPLICANT WAS SUCCESSFUL: THERE ARE MANY LESSONS TO LEARN HERE…
Last week this blog had a fairly detailed review of those circumstances which often lead to no order for costs being made. We have another example here. The applicant had succeeded in the application it had made, however the judge…
CIVIL LITIGATION BRIEF WEBINARS COMING UP LATER THIS YEAR: A NEW DISCOUNT CODE
CLB members have a discount to a series of webinars on damages that start in September. The series is intended to provide practical guidance for practitioners dealing with claims of every size, from straightforward road traffic accidents to catastrophic injury litigation….
COST BITES 439 : IS THE EXISTENCE OF A COSTS BUDGET A REASON NOT TO AWARD INDEMNITY COSTS ?
It is rare for an order about indemnity costs to make the headlines of the national press and media. We are looking at a case which has had a major amount of publicity, not least because of the celebrity status…
BACK TO BASICS MONDAY: RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS: THE RELEVANCE OF THE CLIENTS BEING SOLELY AT FAULT: SOME DIFFICULT ISSUES TO TACKLE
In many cases relating to breach from sanctions the fault may lie with the solicitor rather than the client. This case considers that question directly. The clients’ innocence was an important factor in the court’s discretion. “I take from the…
THROWBACK FRIDAY: AVOIDING NEGLIGENCE CLAIMS IN LITIGATION AN 8 POINT SURVIVAL GUIDE (AUGUST 2019): AND LOOK AT THE LINKS…
This week we go back to August 2019 with a simple (but I hope effective) post on avoiding negligence claims in civil litigation. Eight of the major problem areas were identified and succinct solutions offered. (There have been hundreds of…
EXPERT WATCH 66: RED FLAGS AND EXPERTS (1) :THE DUTY TO CONSIDER THE RANGE OF OPINIONS: OFTEN “HONOURED IN THE BREACH”; OFTEN FATAL TO A PARTY’S CASE
This short series is looking at how you can spot “red flags” when looking at an expert report. There are often aspects of reports that “don’t fare well” when put under scrutiny at trial. “His response was that he usually…
EXPERT WATCH 65 : WHEN THE JUDGES SAY “WE ATTACH VERY LITTLE WEIGHT” TO A REPORT IT IS CLEAR THAT SOMETHING HAS GONE WRONG
This judgment is critical of the way in which an expert report was prepared. The problems were manifold in relation to the way in which the information was obtained, the way it was presented and the failure to consider primary…
WHEN A COURT MAY MAKE NO ORDER FOR COSTS: THE FACTORS CONSIDERED: 12 KEY POINTS AND A USEFUL CHECKLIST FOR PRACTITIONERS
Some posts earlier this week concentrated on a case where the judge made no order for costs. This is an unusual outcome, but still one that has to be considered and the client warned about. Here we take a…
WITNESS EVIDENCE WEDNESDAY: RED FLAGS AND WITNESS STATEMENTS (1): THE WITNESS THAT GIVES THE COURT THEIR OPINION
We have below a series of posts about the dangers of putting “opinion” evidence into witness statements. It has been a constant theme on this site for, at least, 12 years. There is no sign of this abating. Attempts have…
BACK TO BASICS MONDAY: LITIGATORS HAVE TO WARN THEIR CLIENTS THAT SOMETIMES A COURT MAKES NO ORDER FOR COSTS AT ALL: THE PERILS IF YOU DON’T
This post obviously follows on from the post earlier today where the judge made no award for costs after a trial. Neither side had “won” and, in any event, the amount spent in pursuit of the claim was disproportional. This…
GIVING AN UNDERTAKING AS TO DAMAGES WHEN OBTAINING AN INJUNCTION: REMEMBER IT CAN COME BACK TO BITE (AND SOMETIMES BITE HARD…)
When a party obtains an injunction they, usually, have to give an undertaking as to damages. There are now a number of cases where litigants have been found liable to pay damages as a result of that undertaking. We have…
AN ORDER FOR WASTED COSTS NARROWLY AVERTED – BUT THERE WERE ISSUES ON BOTH SIDES: “NONE OF THE LEGAL PROFESSIONALS IN THIS CASE HAVE COVERED THEMSELVES WITH GLORY”
This is a case where the judge found the conduct of a firm of solicitors “utterly extraordinary”. However there were, in fact, a number of errors by both sides. This may (and probably would) have led to a wasted costs…
You must be logged in to post a comment.