COST BITES 408: WHO (IF ANYONE) SHOULD PAY THE COSTS WHEN THE COURT MAKES NO DECISION ON THE SUBSTANTIVE ISSUE?
In this case the judge considered an argument that a claimant who made, but failed, in an application for an interim injunction should not necessarily be liable for costs. This argument was put forward on the basis that the court…
THROWBACK FRIDAY: “WHICH WITNESS WILL BE BELIEVED? IS IT ALL A LOTTERY? (JULY 2014): ISSUES OF WITNESS CREDIBILITY CONSIDERED
This week we go back 12 years to look at one of the recurring themes of this blog: witness credibility. We looked at a judgment which was all about the judge’s assessment of the witnesses. This was made more difficult…
EXPERT WATCH 54 : THE DEPUTY MASTER SHOULD NOT HAVE IGNORED THE EXPERT EVIDENCE BEFORE THE COURT: IT WAS RELEVANT AND ADDRESSED THE CENTRAL ISSUE
We are looking at a case where, on appeal, the judge found that a Deputy Master fell into error by failing to take into account relevant expert evidence provided by a claimant. The judge held that the Master had misunderstood…
A SOLICITOR SHOULD JUST NOT BE SAYING THIS IN A WITNESS STATEMENT: IT “STRAYED WELL BEYOND WHAT SHE COULD LEGALLY GIVE EVIDENCE ABOUT FROM HER OWN KNOWLEDGE INCLUDED HEARSAY FROM AN UNNAMED SOURCE AND INCLUDED STATEMENTS OF OPINION WHICH SHE DID NOT HAVE THE EXPERTISE TO GIVE…”
There are numerous cases reported on this blog where judges have been critical of the “evidence” given by solicitors in witness statements. In many cases, even on cursory examination, it transpires that the lawyer is not in a position to…
COST BITES 407: COURT OF APPEAL OVERTURNS DECISION STRIKING OUT POINTS OF DISPUTE BECAUSE OF NON-AINSWORTH COMPLIANCE: JUDGMENT GIVEN TODAY
In this case the Court of Appeal overturned a decision, itself made on appeal, which had struck out a crucial paragraph of Points of Dispute to a bill of costs. The crucial point here, however, is that this is not…
THE CURRENT IMPORTANCE OF PLEADINGS 85: THERE IS NO “FREE PASS” WHEN AN ACTION IS BROUGHT ON BEHALF OF MULTIPLE CLAIMANTS: “THERE IS A DEFINITE SENSE OF THE CLAIMANTS THRASHING ABOUT, TRYING TO FIND ANY ISSUES WHICH COULD BE TRIED WHICH AVOIDED ANY INVESTIGATION OF ANY FACTS.”
We are returning to this Court of Appeal decision for a second time. Initially we looked at the judgment in relation to the outcome – that the claims could be brought together. However there are important points made here in…
FIVE THOUSAND CLAIMANTS AND JUST EIGHT COURT FEES: COURT OF APPEAL UPHOLDS DECISION ON CPR 7.3
In this case the Court of Appeal upheld a decision that some 5,000 individual small value cases could proceed together as, essentially, one action. The provisions of CPR 7.3 were considered and the Court held that the High Court Judge…
THE COURT WAS WRONG NOT TO STRIKE THE DEFENCE OUT: A FAILURE TO DISPUTE A POINT IN THE JERSEY COURTS MEANT IT WAS NOT OPEN TO A DEFENDANT TO ARGUE IT IN A SECOND ACTION
This is a case where, on appeal, it was held that it was not open to a defendant to bring an action because they had already had the ability to raise issues with a court in Jersey. The judge held…
ADVOCACY – THE JUDGE’S VIEW: LOOKING AT SERIES 2: AND WHY THIS APPLIES TO ALL LITIGATORS… (INCLUDING THAT REGULAR MISSIVE THAT YOU SHOULD NOT THREATEN YOUR OPPONENT WITH A PROCTOLOGY EXAMINATION..)
I will soon be starting a new series on “Advocacy – the Judge’s view”. This draws on the principle that whilst judges are the advocate’s clients they are their “consumers” so to speak. Before that it is useful to remind…
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND LITIGATION: AN UPDATE ON CONSULTATION FINDINGS FROM THE CIVIL JUSTICE COUNCIL
The Civil Justice Council is carrying out a Consultation on the Use of AI for the preparation of court documents. It published an update on its consultation findings yesterday. The preliminary view appears to be that the use of AI…
WITNESS EVIDENCE WEDNESDAY 2: A CHECKLIST FOR THOSE CALLED UP TO PREPARE WITNESS STATEMENTS IN A “FAREPAK” TYPE SCENARIO
The previous post contained a review of the judge’s comments in the Farepak case. The judicial observations that witness statements are often misused and misunderstood is one of an extremely large number of such observations. (The “Related Posts” section below…
WITNESS EVIDENCE WEDNESDAY: THE CASE WHERE THE GOVERNMENT’S WITNESS EVIDENCE WAS SO BAD THAT IT WITHDREW THE CASE BEFORE THE RESPONDENTS GAVE EVIDENCE: WHY THE PRINCIPLES RELATING TO WITNESS EVIDENCE NEED TO BE UNDERSTOOD
Recent posts have revisited the age-old problem of witness statements being misused. They often contain argument and comment. For that reason we are revisiting the observations of Mr Justice Smith in the Farepak case farepak-judges-statement. It presents an object lesson…
WHERE THINGS GO WRONG IN LITIGATION (AND STOPPING IT HAPPENING TO YOU 3): ADVISING A CLIENT THAT IF THEY DISCONTINUE THEN THEY CAN’T COME BACK
We are again looking at the lessons that practitioners can learn from a Legal Ombudsman decision. This time it relates to the need to explain the consequences of taking a procedural step. The point here is that many matters that…
WHERE THINGS WENT WRONG IN LITIGATION (AND STOPPING IT HAPPENING TO YOU) 2: ADVISING A CLIENT THAT THEY ARE NOT LIABLE FOR COSTS BECAUSE PROCEEDINGS HAVE NOT BEEN SERVED
This post arises out of the previous post in the series. However here I want to concentrate on one issue arising out of this. The claimant’s solicitors appear to have advised the claimant that they would not be liable to…
WHERE THINGS WENT WRONG IN LITIGATION (AND STOPPING IT HAPPENING TO YOU) 1: COSTS ADVICE ON DISCONTINUANCE
This series is about examining cases where things went wrong for litigators and what readers can do to avoid this happening to them. The aim is not to criticise those who make mistakes but to use their experience to prevent…
THE ONLINE PROCEDURE (RULES AND PRACTICE DIRECTIONS) RULES 2026 COME INTO FORCE ON THE 7th SEPTEMBER: HERE IS A SUMMARY (AND THE RULES THEMSLVES)
The Online Procedure Rules have been published and come into force on the 7th September 2026. Initially these apply just to possession proceedings. However they are a sign of things to come. ” The Overriding Objective of these Rules is to…
EXPERT WATCH 53 (THAT CLINICAL NEGLIGENCE CASE AGAIN): THE DEFENDANT’S EXPERTS MADE MISTAKES AND THEN “GAVE AN IMPRESSION OF LOFTINESS” : THE JUDGE FELT UNABLE TO RELY ON THEIR CONCLUSIONS
Here we have an example of a judge clearly rejecting the expert evidence adduced on behalf of a defendant and giving clear grounds for the criticism of them. This was in the context of a case where the defendant had…
PROVING THINGS 293: THE CLAIMANT ESTABLISHES CAUSATION IN A CLINICAL NEGLIGENCE CASE: THE JUDGE DID NOT DRAW ADVERSE INFERENCES -AND THIS WAS A SUBMISSION THAT PUT THE DEFENDANT IN SOME JEOPARDY…
This is an interesting case on clinical negligence where judgment was given today. It warrants (and will receive) several posts. Here we look at the trial judge’s rejection of the argument that adverse inferences should be drawn when the claimant…
EXPERT WATCH 52: A REMINDER THAT THE JUDGE REMAINS THE SOLE FINDER OF FACT: (HOWEVER THIS A CASE WHERE THE JUDGE IS HIGHLY COMPLIMENTARY ABOUT SOME OF THE EXPERTS)
Here we look at the judge’s comments on expert evidence arising from a complex case in the Commercial Court. The judgment provides a reminder that experts should not be instructed to comment on matters of fact which are the sole…
THE CURRENT IMPORTANCE OF PLEADINGS 84 : DEFENCE STRUCK OUT “THE SMALL PARTS OF THE PLEADINGS THAT DO ADDRESS THE CLAIMANT’S CARE ARE LIKE TINY ISLANDS LOST IN A VAST OCEAN OF IRRELEVANCE”
This is a case where the judge had no hesitation in striking out both a defence and counterclaim. The counterclaim had no prospect of success, the defence breached every rule and principle relating to statements of case. The judge, helpfully,…
BACK TO BASICS MONDAY: WHEN A RULE OR AN ORDER PRESCRIBES A PAGE LIMIT TO A WITNESS STATEMENT – THEN YOU’D BETTER STICK TO IT: THE COURT IS UNLIKELY TO CONDONE “FORENSIC CHEATING”
Here we are, with no apology, looking at the same case in the earlier post again. The earlier post dealt with the issue of relief from sanction. Here I want to concentrate on the litigant’s deliberate decision to breach the…
RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS: AS STRONGLY WORDED A REFUSAL AS I HAVE SEEN: THE CONCEPT “DOES NOT EMBODY A PRINCIPLE OF “BREACH NOW REPENT LATER”
Here we look at a strongly worded judgment where relief from sanctions was refused. A party had exceeded the page limit set by court directions and also served the statement late. The judge dismissed the arguments that the other side…
COST BITES 406: CAN A PARTY RECOVER UNNECESSARY COSTS AS DAMAGES? THE CONSEQUENCES OF AN UNNECESSARY SECOND ACTION CONSIDERED IN THE HIGH COURT
This is a judgment that considers the difficult issue of whether a claimant, who has been put to unnecessary costs of pursuing to separate actions because of the defendant’s conduct, can claim the unnecessary elements of costs back as damages. …
COST BITES 405: SHOULD A SUCCESSFUL CLAIMANT’S CONDUCT LEAD TO A DEDUCTION OF 45% OF THEIR COSTS? A TOOTH DECISION…
This is a case where the judge had to consider whether a successful claimants costs should be reduced because of conduct. The judge found that there were grounds to criticise the claimant’s conduct of the action. However this could not…
SHOULD THE COURT ALLOW A “NEWLY APPOINTED” EMPLOYEE TO REPRESENT A LIMITED COMPANY AT A HEARING?
CPR 39.6 permits a company to be represented by an employee where the employee is authorised by the company and the court gives permission. We have here a case where the proposed representative only became an employee part-way through the…
ASKING THE JUDGE QUESTIONS AFTER JUDGMENT IS DELIVERED: THEY HAVE TO BE NECESSARY TO ENABLE THE PARTIES TO UNDERSTAND THE REASONING OF THE DECISION (AND THESE GO TOO FAR…)
As you can see from the “Related Posts” section below this is not the first time we have considered the position where a losing litigant has written to the judge seeking “clarification” and where the judge has felt that this…
THE CURRENT IMPORTANCE OF PLEADINGS 83: THE CASE OF THE SOLICITOR’S LIEN: THE JUDGE SHOULD NOT HAVE DECIDED AN APPLICATION TO STRIKE OUT ON THE BASIS OF AN UNPLEADED CASE
We look at a case that relates to a solicitor’s lien and alleged breach of duty by those solicitors. It also deals with the basis upon which a judge should determine an application to strike out/summary judgment – making it…
THE NEW SRA GUIDANCE ON SUPERVISION 7: RECORDING ARRANGMENTS (IF IT ISN’T WRITTEN DOWN IT HASN’T HAPPENED…)
We are returning to the SRA Guidance on Effective Supervision, this time looking at the importance that is given to recording the supervision arrangements. It is clear that the SRA expects these to be written down. I have provided a…
AN APPLICATION TO SET A DEFAULT JUDGMENT ASIDE (3): THE DENTON CRITERIA CONSIDERED
An application to set aside a properly obtained default judgment requires the court to consider a number of factors. Having considered whether there are “real prospects” of successfully defending the claim and the issue of promptness the court then goes…
AN APPLICATION TO SET A DEFAULT JUDGMENT ASIDE (2): CONSIDERATION OF “PROMPTNESS” WHEN NOTHING HAPPENED FOR A YEAR…
We are continuing our examination of the High Court judgment yesterday about setting aside a default judgment. Here the judge considered the question of “promptness” in circumstances where the default judgment had been entered for a year before the application…
THE NEW SRA GUIDANCE ON EFFECTIVE SUPERVISION 6: WHAT IS MEANT BY THE “CONDUCT OF LITIGATION”? (IT TURNS OUT ITS A MATTER OF “PROFESSIONAL JUDGMENT”)
Knowing what the “conduct of litigation” means is an essential piece of knowledge for all litigators. If you allow “unauthorised” persons to conduct litigation then you (and they) are committing a criminal offence (and you are also in contempt of…
AN APPLICATION TO SET A DEFAULT JUDGMENT ASIDE (1): THE EVIDENCE AS TO THE MERITS: THE JUDGE SHOULD NOT HAVE CONDUCTED A “MINI TRIAL”
A defendant applying to set aside a properly obtained default judgment has a number of hurdles to clear. The court will consider the “merits” of the proposed defence, the reason for the delay, “promptness” and then go on to consider…
WITNESS EVIDENCE WEDNESDAY: EVIDENCE BY VIDEO LINK FROM ABROAD: A POINT TO WATCH : SOME USEFUL GUIDANCE AND PRACTICAL STEPS
There are several cases where the courts have observed that attempts to allow a witness to give evidence from abroad are not, in fact, legal. This was highlighted in a judgment yesterday. Some countries have particular rules governing the taking…
EXPERT WATCH 51: THE EXPERT VALUERS SHOULD HAVE GONE INTO THIS EXERCISE “BLIND” – THEIR CREDIBILITY WOULD BE “MUCH IMPROVED”
In this case the judge expressly sets out a method of instructing the experts which would have been of more assistance to the court. In essence that the valuation experts should have been instructed, initially, without any knowledge of the…
THE COURT OF APPEAL OVERTURNS A JUDICIAL REVIEW DECISION IN FAVOUR OF A SOLICITOR: THE OMBUDSMAN GOT NOTHING WRONG (QUITE A LOT HERE ABOUT VULNERABLE CLIENTS AS WELL…)
In a judgment today the Court of Appeal have overturned a High Court decision that was (partially) in favour of a solicitor who had sought judicial review of a decision of the Legal Ombudsman. The Court has restored the Ombudsman’s…
DEEPFAKES AND THE LAWYER: SOME USEFUL CHECKLISTS AND LINKS: “VERIFICATION SHOULD OCCUR BEFORE EVIDENCE IS DEPLOYED, NOT AFTER AUTHENTICITY IS CHALLENGED…”
The previous post dealt with a case where a participant in a relatively small dispute about shared childcare was found guilty of putting “deepfake” evidence before the courts. This provides a wake up call to us all that our clients,…
“DEEPFAKE” EVIDENCE POSSIBLY COMING TO A COURT NEAR YOU SOON: LESSONS FROM AMERICA…
We have looked at the problems caused by Artificial Intelligence many times on this blog. Practitioners also have to be aware of the possibility that the evidence they are given by their own clients, or used by the other side,…
WHEN A LOCAL AUTHORITY REQUIRES RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS: “IT IS PARTICULARLY IMPORTANT THAT THE PUBLIC BODY FILES ITS PAPERS IN A TIMELY FASHION AND CO-OPERATES WITH THE CLAIMANT”
Here we look at a case where a defendant local authority had to apply for relief from sanctions in relation to breaches of court orders and directions. The judge was critical of the defendant’s conduct, pointing out that there was…
THE CURRENT IMPORTANCE OF PLEADINGS 82: THERE MAY BE A POTENTIALLY VIABLE CLAIM HERE BUT YOU HAVEN’T PLEADED IT: COURT OF APPEAL OVERTURN A DECISION TO GRANT PERMISSION TO AMEND COUNTERCLAIM
Here we have an unusual example of the Court of Appeal overturning a decision granting permission to amend a statement of case (in this case a counterclaim). The Court of Appeal held that the pleading did not give the information…
THE NEW SRA GUIDANCE ON EFFECTIVE SUPERVISION 5: GOOD PRACTICE SUGGESTIONS
We are continuing with our examination of the updated SRA Guidance on Effective Supervision. This is a relatively short section but of considerable importance. There is a series of checklists on this topic (these are produced for this blog and…
COST BITES 404: JUDGE ORDERS DEFENDANT TO PAY COSTS ON THE INDEMNITY BASIS: PARTIES HAVE AN OBLIGATION TO ENGAGE WITH THE PROCESS OF LITIGATION: “THEY SHOULD BE USING NON-COURT BASED DISPUTE RESOLUTION WHEREVER POSSIBLE”
Here we look at a case where the court made an order for indemnity costs. The defendant had failed to engage fully in the litigation process and, importantly, failed to respond to the claimant’s offer to mediate. The Master was…
AVOIDING NEGLIGENCE CLAIMS AND PROCEDURAL PROBLEMS – CLB IS PICKING UP THE PACE: LOOKING AT A CASE WHERE EVERYTHING WHEN DISASTROUSLY WRONG PROCEDURALLY – WITH CLEAR GUIDANCE ON HOW TO AVOID THIS GOING FORWARD
This blog has been looking at cases relating to civil procedure for 13 years this month. We have seen many hundreds (possibly thousands) of cases where things have gone badly wrong, particularly in relation to procedure and limitation. Most of…
NEW COURT FEES COMING INTO FORCE ON THE 13th JULY 2026: SOME BRAND NEW PROVISIONS AND THE INFLATIONARY INCREASES: THE CIVIL AND FAMILY COURTS, THE MAGISTRATES’ COURT, THE LANDS CHAMBER (AND MANY OTHERS)
Some significant changes are taking place in court fees on the 13th July 2026. Some 170 fees will increase in line with inflation. Four sets of fees will be reduced to reflect reductions in their underlying costs. In addition there…
BACK TO BASICS MONDAY: MAKING AN APPLICATION TO THE COURT: HOW TO AVOID PROBLEMS: KEY POINTS AND SOME USEFUL CHECKLISTS
There are hundreds of applications made each date to courts up and down the land. Pausing for a second, how many of those applications are made without the solicitor looking at the rules and Practice Direction relating to making applications….
PROVING THINGS 292: CLAIMANT ORDERED TO PROVIDE SECURITY FOR COSTS: NO “HUMAN SOURCE” FOR THE MATERIAL PROVIDED: THE IMPORTANCE OF GIVING THE SOURCE OF INFORMATION AND BELIEF
Here we are looking at another case where the court considered the burden of proof in an application for security for costs. In this case the claimant was ordered to provide security. An interesting feature is the identified failure of…
THE KEY CASES IN FATAL ACCIDENT DAMAGES 2026: WEBINAR ON THE 24th JUNE 2026
You could study the Fatal Accidents Act for a long time, decades even, and have no clue at all as to how damages are assessed. This is because the relevant principles are in set out in case law. A detailed…
GETTING TO GRIPS WITH TIME ESTIMATES: THE KEY POINTS AND SOME USEFUL POINTERS AND CHECKLISTS: AVOIDING YOUR ESTIMATE BEING CALLED “ABSURD”
The earlier post on time estimates has prompted me to revisit the issue with some practical suggestions for practitioners. Here we have a review of the cases, the key points that emerge and a series of checklists of the issues…
COST BITES 403: JUDGMENT TODAY: SUCCESS FEE AND ATE PREMIUM NOT PAYABLE BY CLIENT WHEN THE SOLICITOR FAILED TO MAKE REASONABLE ENQUIRIES ABOUT BTE INSURANCE
Here we look at a judgment given today which highlights the importance of considering the existence of pre-existing insurance policies when solicitors are acting for a claimant. The judge held that the solicitors had made inadequate enquiries in relation to…
THE VEXED ISSUE OF TIME ESTIMATES (AND VOLUMINOUS BUNDLES) AGAIN: IF YOU ARE GOING TO “JUMP THE QUEUE” THEN THERE IS A DUTY ON BOTH PARTIES TO PRESENT A CASE THAT CAN BE HEARD IN THE TIME GIVEN
We have looked at the issue of accurate time estimates many times. Here we have a case where the parties agreed to a time estimate for a hearing that, the judge found, was clearly inaccurate. The judge observed that this…
SUPERVISION FOR LAWYERS: USEFUL LINKS: “REMEMBER THAT SUPERVISION HAS NUMEROUS BENEFITS”
Yesterday I wrote about the SRA Guidance in relation to choosing supervisors. Despite supervision being central to a well run, and profitable, legal practice there is little guidance given to lawyers on how to go about being a good supervisor. …
You must be logged in to post a comment.