Civil Litigation Brief ®
Menu
  • Home
  • About
  • Membership Plans
  • Webinars
  • Login
Updates and Commentary on Civil Procedure, by Gordon Exall, Barrister, Kings Chambers
Browse: Home » Witness statements » Page 10
A "GENERAL INCREASE IN HOSTILITY AND AGGRESSIVENESS IN THE CONDUCT OF DISPUTES": CLAIMANT'S APPLICATION TO COMMIT STRUCK OUT AS AN ABUSE OF PROCESS

A “GENERAL INCREASE IN HOSTILITY AND AGGRESSIVENESS IN THE CONDUCT OF DISPUTES”: CLAIMANT’S APPLICATION TO COMMIT STRUCK OUT AS AN ABUSE OF PROCESS

July 17, 2020 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Committal proceedings, Members Content, Witness statements

The judgment in  Navigator Equities Ltd & Anor v Deripaska [2020] EWHC 1798 (Comm) emphasises that there is a particular duty on a party bringing committal proceedings.   The judgment has very important things to say about the way in which…

NEARLY LEGAL: JOHNNY DEPP: WITNESS STATEMENTS AND SELF-PROTECTION FOR THE LAWYER: "EVERY LITIGATION SOLICITOR IN THE COUNTRY SIGHS HEAVILY IN WEARY FAMILIARITY..."

NEARLY LEGAL: JOHNNY DEPP: WITNESS STATEMENTS AND SELF-PROTECTION FOR THE LAWYER: “EVERY LITIGATION SOLICITOR IN THE COUNTRY SIGHS HEAVILY IN WEARY FAMILIARITY…”

July 9, 2020 · by gexall · in Avoiding negligence claims, Civil evidence, Members Content, Witness statements

A Tweet this evening, followed by a number of comments, causes me to repeat my advice on the necessity of the lawyer protecting themselves when drafting a witness statement on behalf of a client or witness.     NEARLY LEGAL…

WHEN SHOULD A SOLICITOR MAKE A WITNESS STATEMENT ON BEHALF OF THEIR CLIENTS?  A REVIEW OF THE CASES

WHEN SHOULD A SOLICITOR MAKE A WITNESS STATEMENT ON BEHALF OF THEIR CLIENTS? A REVIEW OF THE CASES

July 6, 2020 · by gexall · in Applications, Avoiding negligence claims, Case Management, Civil evidence, Members Content, Witness statements

Last week I gave an in-house talk to a London firm of solicitors.*  One of the matters we discussed was when (if ever) it was appropriate for a solicitor to make a witness statement in support of an interlocutory application. …

ARGUING YOUR CASE THROUGH THE WITNESS STATEMENTS: THIS MAY NOT END WELL

ARGUING YOUR CASE THROUGH THE WITNESS STATEMENTS: THIS MAY NOT END WELL

July 1, 2020 · by gexall · in Advocacy, Applications, Civil evidence, Members Content, Witness statements

Yesterday I wrote about the judgment in Skatteforvaltningen (The Danish Customs And Tax Administration) v Solo Capital Partners LLP & Ors [2020] EWHC 1624 (Comm). In particular the very vigorous judicial disapproval of an attempt to “argue” the case by way…

SOLICITORS GIVING EVIDENCE: A DUTY TO BE COMPLETELY HONEST AND SCRUPULOUSLY ACCURATE

SOLICITORS GIVING EVIDENCE: A DUTY TO BE COMPLETELY HONEST AND SCRUPULOUSLY ACCURATE

June 30, 2020 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil evidence, Conduct, Members Content, Witness statements

There are particular dangers for solicitors giving evidence.  This morning I wrote about the common (but totally wrong) practice of solicitors using witness statements to argue points of law.  In Ras Al Khaimah Investment Authority v Azima [2020] EWHC 1686…

WITNESS STATEMENTS "NOT IN MY STOCK IN TRADE": HIGH COURT JUDGE HIGHLY CRITICAL OF ARGUMENTATIVE AND LARGELY IRRELEVANT WITNESS STATEMENTS

WITNESS STATEMENTS “NOT IN MY STOCK IN TRADE”: HIGH COURT JUDGE HIGHLY CRITICAL OF ARGUMENTATIVE AND LARGELY IRRELEVANT WITNESS STATEMENTS

June 30, 2020 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil evidence, Members Content, Summary judgment, Witness statements

Last week I wrote about the report on witness evidence working group of the business and property courts.   That report commented that drafting witness statements (more accurately evidence in chief) was no longer part of a lawyer’s “stock in trade”. …

WITNESS STATEMENTS:  EDITED HIGHLIGHTS OF THE REPORT OF THE WITNESS EVIDENCE WORKING GROUP: THE BUSINESS AND PROPERTY COURTS

WITNESS STATEMENTS: EDITED HIGHLIGHTS OF THE REPORT OF THE WITNESS EVIDENCE WORKING GROUP: THE BUSINESS AND PROPERTY COURTS

June 26, 2020 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Members Content, Witness statements

This report  of the Witness Evidence Working Group was produced at the end of last year.  It highlights some major issues in relation to the use of witness statements, and the role and experience of those preparing them. It has…

THE SEVEN YEAR ITCH: CIVIL LITIGATION BRIEFS' 7th (OR 29th?) BIRTHDAY: FACTS, FIGURES AND HOW IT ALL BEGAN

THE SEVEN YEAR ITCH: CIVIL LITIGATION BRIEFS’ 7th (OR 29th?) BIRTHDAY: FACTS, FIGURES AND HOW IT ALL BEGAN

June 21, 2020 · by gexall · in Avoiding negligence claims, Case Management, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Costs, Members Content, Witness statements

This week sees the seventh anniversary of Civil Litigation Brief as a blog.  That, it appears, is relatively young as a blog, the housing law blog Nearly Legal recently celebrated its 14th anniversary and is well into its truculent teenage…

WEBINARS ON LAW, PROCEDURE AND DAMAGES: READ ALL ABOUT THEM...

WEBINARS ON LAW, PROCEDURE AND DAMAGES: READ ALL ABOUT THEM…

June 17, 2020 · by gexall · in Case Management, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Credibility of experts, Damages, Fatal Accidents, Members Content, Risks of litigation, Webinar, Witness statements

Since lockdown has made giving live presentations impossible I have been involved in presenting a number of webinars.  This would seem a good time to set them out.  Those that  have been given earlier this year are still available on…

CIVIL PROCEDURE BACK TO BASICS 79: NON-DISCLOSURE OF THE OTHER SIDE'S WITNESS STATEMENT

CIVIL PROCEDURE BACK TO BASICS 79: NON-DISCLOSURE OF THE OTHER SIDE’S WITNESS STATEMENT

June 15, 2020 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Witness statements

Today we are looking at CPR 32.12.  The rule preventing a party using the other side’s witness statements for purposes other than the action they were served in. THE RULE Use of witness statements for other purposes 32.12 (1) Except…

OPINION EVIDENCE AND DEFECTIVE WITNESS STATEMENTS: EVIDENCE NOT ALLOWED AT TRIAL

OPINION EVIDENCE AND DEFECTIVE WITNESS STATEMENTS: EVIDENCE NOT ALLOWED AT TRIAL

June 11, 2020 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Witness statements

In Harlow -v- Aspect Contracts Ltd [2020] EWHC 1488 (TCC) Harlow v Aspect Contracts Ltd [2020] EWHC 1488 (TCC) Alexander Nissen QC (sitting as a High Court judge) allowed an application preventing the defendant relying on a witness statement that was,…

COVID REPEATS 43: FAREPAK: "A DOCUMENT CREATED IN THE LANGUAGE OF LAWYERS BY THE LAWYERS"

COVID REPEATS 43: FAREPAK: “A DOCUMENT CREATED IN THE LANGUAGE OF LAWYERS BY THE LAWYERS”

June 5, 2020 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Members Content, Witness statements

Today we are revisiting the observations of Mr Justice Smith in the Farepak case farepak-judges-statement. It presents an object lesson in the need for careful preparation of witness evidence and identifying precisely what “evidence” a witness can give.   “The…

COVID REPEATS 41: OFFICE GOSSIP IS NOT EVIDENCE

COVID REPEATS 41: OFFICE GOSSIP IS NOT EVIDENCE

June 3, 2020 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Members Content, Witness statements

This week we continue with our look back at cases in relation to witness evidence.  This contains another reminder that there is a requirement, a mandatory requirement, that a witness making a witness statement gives the source of their information…

COVID REPEATS 40: ASKING LEADING QUESTIONS AND WITNESS STATEMENTS: THIS IS GOING TO END BADLY: EIGHT CRUCIAL POINTS ON EVIDENCE (& THEN 10 MORE)

COVID REPEATS 40: ASKING LEADING QUESTIONS AND WITNESS STATEMENTS: THIS IS GOING TO END BADLY: EIGHT CRUCIAL POINTS ON EVIDENCE (& THEN 10 MORE)

June 2, 2020 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Members Content, Witness statements

This week we are looking at witness statements and the process of gathering witness evidence. In August 2015 I wrote at length about the judgment of Mr Justice Jay in Susan Saunderson & Others -v- Sonae Industria (UK) Ltd [2015] EWCA…

COVID REPEATS 39: THE DANGERS OF OBTAINING ONE-SIDED WITNESS STATEMENTS: A PROBLEM THAT CANNOT BE GARAGED

COVID REPEATS 39: THE DANGERS OF OBTAINING ONE-SIDED WITNESS STATEMENTS: A PROBLEM THAT CANNOT BE GARAGED

June 1, 2020 · by gexall · in Avoiding negligence claims, Civil evidence, Members Content, Witness statements

This week we are looking at past posts and cases on witness statements and witness evidence. This is an area with no shortage of cases to choose from. I have made the point, many times, that witness statements are basically…

WHY YOU NEED TO KNOW THE RULES AND GUIDANCE IN RELATION TO SURVEILLANCE EVIDENCE: A WEBINAR

WHY YOU NEED TO KNOW THE RULES AND GUIDANCE IN RELATION TO SURVEILLANCE EVIDENCE: A WEBINAR

May 29, 2020 · by gexall · in Applications, Avoiding negligence claims, Civil evidence, Members Content, Relief from sanctions, Witness statements

In the  judgment discussed earlier today in Tully v Exterion Media (UK) Ltd & Anor [2020] EWHC 1119 (QB), Master McCloud, made some important observations in relation to how the courts deal with surveillance evidence.  As a result of that…

LATE WITNESS STATEMENT: RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS NOT GRANTED:  A WARNING AGAINST COMPLACENCY

LATE WITNESS STATEMENT: RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS NOT GRANTED: A WARNING AGAINST COMPLACENCY

May 29, 2020 · by gexall · in Applications, Avoiding negligence claims, Case Management, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Relief from sanctions, Witness statements

Anyone who has had the pleasure of hearing Professor Dominic Regan lecture will know that he gives a constant warning that the Denton principles have not gone away. In relation to the late service of budgets in particular, but in…

WITNESS STATEMENTS FULL OF VITRIOL - THIS IS NEVER GOING TO END WELL...

WITNESS STATEMENTS FULL OF VITRIOL – THIS IS NEVER GOING TO END WELL…

May 28, 2020 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Members Content, Witness statements

The “Covid Repeats” series next week will revisit some of those (many) cases where judges have found witness statements to be inadequate.  The inclusion of unnecessary matters in witness statements is a continuing issue. It can be seen in the…

EVALUATING EVIDENCE ON APPEAL: THE APPELLATE COURT WILL NOT READILY DISPLACE THE FINDINGS OF THE TRIAL JUDGE

EVALUATING EVIDENCE ON APPEAL: THE APPELLATE COURT WILL NOT READILY DISPLACE THE FINDINGS OF THE TRIAL JUDGE

May 27, 2020 · by gexall · in Appeals, Civil evidence, Members Content, Witness statements

I am grateful to  Christopher Kardahji from Irwin Mitchell solicitors  for sending me a copy of the judgment of Mr Justice Freedman in Lenord -v- First Manchester Limited [2020] EWHC 982 (QB).  The judgment contains a detailed analysis of the…

AFFIDAVITS, COMPULSION,  EXHIBITS AND THE IMPLIED DUTY NOT TO DISCLOSE TO THIRD PARTIES: HIGH COURT DECISION

AFFIDAVITS, COMPULSION, EXHIBITS AND THE IMPLIED DUTY NOT TO DISCLOSE TO THIRD PARTIES: HIGH COURT DECISION

May 26, 2020 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Witness statements

I am grateful to barrister Sarah Walker for sending me a copy of the judgment of Deputy Insolvencies and Companies Court Judge Kyriakides in the Official Receiver -v- Skeene & Bowers [2020] EWHC 1252. It concerned the issue of whether…

LIES, DAMN LIES AND LITIGATION: WHY PEOPLE TELL LIES AND WHAT DOES THE JUDGE DO? (A RECAP)

LIES, DAMN LIES AND LITIGATION: WHY PEOPLE TELL LIES AND WHAT DOES THE JUDGE DO? (A RECAP)

May 26, 2020 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Members Content, Witness statements

For various reasons issues relating to the credibility of witnesses and “lies” are in the news this week. Litigation is not always about  lies or liars. Often it is about misunderstandings, mistaken recollection and people convincing themselves that they are correct….

ASSESSING WITNESS CREDIBILITY:  A REMINDER OF THE BASIC PRINCIPLES

ASSESSING WITNESS CREDIBILITY: A REMINDER OF THE BASIC PRINCIPLES

May 25, 2020 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Members Content, Witness statements

Today is  is a good day to look  again at the judgment of Mr Justice Leggatt in Gestmin SGPS S.A. -v- Credit Suisse [2013] EWCA 3560 (Comm).  This is case that is now mentioned regularly in cases involving witness recollection and…

COVID REPEATS 30: THE LYING WITNESS: THE APPROACH OF THE CIVIL COURTS

COVID REPEATS 30: THE LYING WITNESS: THE APPROACH OF THE CIVIL COURTS

May 23, 2020 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Members Content, Witness statements

We are going back to what was the most widely read post on this blog in 2017 and 2018. It is about witnesses telling lies.Mr Justice Smith has observed that “witnesses can regularly lie”.  How do lies impact upon the…

COVID REPEATS 29: "THERE IS NO PRIMER FOR SCUTTLERS": THE JUDGE'S ASSESSMENT OF EVIDENCE WHERE (HE FOUND) THAT A SHIP WAS SUNK DELIBERATELY

COVID REPEATS 29: “THERE IS NO PRIMER FOR SCUTTLERS”: THE JUDGE’S ASSESSMENT OF EVIDENCE WHERE (HE FOUND) THAT A SHIP WAS SUNK DELIBERATELY

May 22, 2020 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Members Content, Witness statements

We are looking again at the judgment of Mr Justice Teare in Kairos Shipping Ltd -v- The Standard Club Europe Ltd [2016] EWHC 2412 (Admlty) is a comprehensive lesson in thorough fact finding.   “There is no primer or guide to…

PROVING THINGS 176: RELYING ON MEMORY FROM EVENTS A LONG TIME BACK

PROVING THINGS 176: RELYING ON MEMORY FROM EVENTS A LONG TIME BACK

May 19, 2020 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Members Content, Witness statements

I am grateful to David Platt QC  for sending me a copy of the judgment given today of Geoffrey Tattersall QC (sitting as a Deputy High Court Judge) in  Bannister -v- Freemans Public Limited Company [2020] EWHC 1256 (QB).  …

JOHNNY DEPP: LATE WITNESS STATEMENTS & THE COURTS: JUDGE CURTAILS THE EVIDENCE THAT CAN BE CALLED

JOHNNY DEPP: LATE WITNESS STATEMENTS & THE COURTS: JUDGE CURTAILS THE EVIDENCE THAT CAN BE CALLED

May 18, 2020 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil evidence, Members Content, Relief from sanctions, Witness statements

The judgment of Mr Justice Nicol in Depp II v News Group Newspapers Ltd & Anor [2020] EWHC 1237 (QB) is interesting because the judge grants relief from sanctions because of a delay in service of witness statements. More significantly,…

WHEN A DEFENDANT FILED A COSTS BUDGET LATE: RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS REFUSED: "THE DEFAULTING PARTY HAS ONLY ITSELF OR ITS LEGAL REPRESENTATIVE TO BLAME"

WHEN A DEFENDANT FILED A COSTS BUDGET LATE: RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS REFUSED: “THE DEFAULTING PARTY HAS ONLY ITSELF OR ITS LEGAL REPRESENTATIVE TO BLAME”

May 14, 2020 · by gexall · in Applications, Avoiding negligence claims, Members Content, Relief from sanctions, Statements of Truth, Witness statements

The judgment of HHJ Simon Barker QC in Heathfield International LLC v Axiom Stone (London) Ltd [2020] EWHC 1075 (Ch) is another example of a party coming to grief because of the failure to file a costs budget timeously.  That…

THOSE WHO DRAFTED THE WITNESS STATEMENTS HAVE "FORGOTTEN WHAT THE ROLE OF THE WITNESS STATEMENT IS": BACK TO BASICS FROM MR JUSTICE WAKSMAN

THOSE WHO DRAFTED THE WITNESS STATEMENTS HAVE “FORGOTTEN WHAT THE ROLE OF THE WITNESS STATEMENT IS”: BACK TO BASICS FROM MR JUSTICE WAKSMAN

May 9, 2020 · by gexall · in Applications, Case Management, Civil evidence, Members Content, Witness statements

I am returning to more traditional territory in looking at the judgment of Mr Justice Waksman in PCP Capital Partners LLP & Anor v Barclays Bank Plc [2020] EWHC 646 (Comm).  Witness evidence and witness statements have been a regular…

COVID REPEATS 16: THE DOG THAT GOT A BETTER MASTER'S DEGREE THAN A WITNESS (WHEN WITNESSES DIG REALLY DEEP HOLES FOR THEMSELVES)

COVID REPEATS 16: THE DOG THAT GOT A BETTER MASTER’S DEGREE THAN A WITNESS (WHEN WITNESSES DIG REALLY DEEP HOLES FOR THEMSELVES)

May 9, 2020 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Coronavirus, Members Content, Well being, Witness statements

To lighten up a Saturday we are looking again at the judgment of Mr Justice Ramsey in BSky B -v- HP Enterprises Ltd [2010] EWHC 86 (TCC). This contains some interesting comments on the credibility of witnesses and how the…

COVID REPEATS 13: "CLOSING ARGUMENT WAS ... AND EYE-GLAZING, BUM-NUMBING, DISC-HERNIATING TOTAL OF 662 PAGES"

COVID REPEATS 13: “CLOSING ARGUMENT WAS … AND EYE-GLAZING, BUM-NUMBING, DISC-HERNIATING TOTAL OF 662 PAGES”

May 6, 2020 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Coronavirus, Members Content, Witness statements

For this repeat we are staying with Mr Justice J.W. Quinn, this time looking at his judgment in  The Hearing Clinic (Niagara Falls) Inc -v- Ontario Ltd, Lewis & Lewis 2014 ONAC 5831 (CanLii) It is a judgment worth looking at again, not…

MORE ON THE NEW STATEMENT OF TRUTH: CAN YOU CHANGE THE WORDING?

MORE ON THE NEW STATEMENT OF TRUTH: CAN YOU CHANGE THE WORDING?

April 11, 2020 · by gexall · in Applications, Avoiding negligence claims, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Statements of Case, Statements of Truth, Witness statements

I have had questions, from several sources, about whether it is possible to amend the “new form” of the  statement of truth when a document is not being signed by a party to litigation.   PRACTICE DIRECTION 22. The new…

THE NEW RULES: LINKS TO ALL THE POSTS: MITIGATION, THE STATEMENT OF TRUTH AND WITNESS STATEMENTS IN A FOREIGN LANGUAGE

THE NEW RULES: LINKS TO ALL THE POSTS: MITIGATION, THE STATEMENT OF TRUTH AND WITNESS STATEMENTS IN A FOREIGN LANGUAGE

April 7, 2020 · by gexall · in Civil Procedure, Members Content, Rule Changes, Witness statements

The rules that came into force yesterday seemed to take some people by surprise.  I did write about them back in February, but a few things have happened since then.  Here are links to the  previous posts on the new…

NEW WEBINAR (COMING SOON):  WITNESS STATEMENTS: THE STATEMENT OF TRUTH AND SOCIAL ISOLATION.

NEW WEBINAR (COMING SOON): WITNESS STATEMENTS: THE STATEMENT OF TRUTH AND SOCIAL ISOLATION.

April 6, 2020 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Coronavirus, Courses, Members Content, Witness statements

I am preparing and recording a webinar on preparing and drafting witness statements.  Particular attention is being given to the difficulties of interviewing witnesses and preparing statements in a time of social isolation.  The webinar should be available from the…

THE OTHER IMPORTANT RULE CHANGE TODAY IN RELATION TO WITNESS STATEMENTS: AND, HONESTLY, THIS COULDN'T HAVE COME AT A BETTER TIME

THE OTHER IMPORTANT RULE CHANGE TODAY IN RELATION TO WITNESS STATEMENTS: AND, HONESTLY, THIS COULDN’T HAVE COME AT A BETTER TIME

April 6, 2020 · by gexall · in Avoiding negligence claims, Civil Procedure, Clinical Negligence, Coronavirus, Members Content, Witness statements

Along with changes to the statement of truth the rule changes effective from today now impose a further obligation in relation to witness statements.  I have written about this before (but much has happened since).   THE NEW RULES From…

GOOD MORNING FOLKS: REMEMBER (TO ADD TO ALL YOUR OTHER TROUBLES) THE RULES CHANGE TODAY...

GOOD MORNING FOLKS: REMEMBER (TO ADD TO ALL YOUR OTHER TROUBLES) THE RULES CHANGE TODAY…

April 6, 2020 · by gexall · in Civil Procedure, Members Content, Rule Changes, Statements of Truth, Witness statements

To add to all the practical difficulties facing litigators the 113th update to Practice Direction Amendments comes into force today. Here are some of the key points. THE AMENDMENT TO THE STATEMENT OF TRUTH This the major change that will…

REMOTE HEARINGS: BUT WHAT ABOUT "WITNESS DEMEANOUR"?

REMOTE HEARINGS: BUT WHAT ABOUT “WITNESS DEMEANOUR”?

March 29, 2020 · by gexall · in Coronavirus, Members Content, Remote hearings, Witness statements

One of the issues that has been raised in objection to “remote” hearings is the question of witness demeanour.  In modern litigation recent case law suggests that this is not a major factor in any event.   “No doubt it…

REMOTE WORKING AND THE LITIGATOR 3: SIGNING WITNESS STATEMENTS IN A TIME OF SOCIAL ISOLATION

REMOTE WORKING AND THE LITIGATOR 3: SIGNING WITNESS STATEMENTS IN A TIME OF SOCIAL ISOLATION

March 25, 2020 · by gexall · in Civil Procedure, Coronavirus, Members Content, Statements of Truth, Witness statements

One major difficulty that faces all litigators at present is how to get witness statements signed.    Here are a few ideas.   E-SIGNATURES MAY BE VALID There is no binding authority on this issue. However the decision of District Judge…

REMOTE WORKING AND THE LITIGATOR 1: THE NEW REQUIREMENT FOR WITNESS STATEMENTS

REMOTE WORKING AND THE LITIGATOR 1: THE NEW REQUIREMENT FOR WITNESS STATEMENTS

March 20, 2020 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Coronavirus, Members Content, Witness statements

Given that many of us will be working from home and not having direct contact with colleagues or clients I am starting a series on the issues we litigators currently face. The first looks at the issues caused by the…

GIVING THE SOURCE OF INFORMATION AND BELIEF IN A WITNESS STATEMENT: NOT A MERE TECHNICALITY: FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH RULES CAN HAVE MAJOR CONSEQUENCES

GIVING THE SOURCE OF INFORMATION AND BELIEF IN A WITNESS STATEMENT: NOT A MERE TECHNICALITY: FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH RULES CAN HAVE MAJOR CONSEQUENCES

March 15, 2020 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Witness statements

This blog has dealt, many times, with the difficulties  that  can arise when a solicitor makes a witness statement in support of an interlocutory application.  Not least there is a duty to give details of the source of information and…

DEFENDANT'S PART 20 CLAIM AGAINST CLAIMANT'S WITNESSES STRUCK OUT: WITNESSES HAVE IMMUNITY (AND THIS HAS CONSEQUENCES...)

DEFENDANT’S PART 20 CLAIM AGAINST CLAIMANT’S WITNESSES STRUCK OUT: WITNESSES HAVE IMMUNITY (AND THIS HAS CONSEQUENCES…)

March 12, 2020 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Striking out, Witness statements

I am grateful to barrister David Green for supplying me with a note* of the judgment of HHJ Saggerson in Holley -v- Woodburn.  HHJ Saggerson, Central London County Court). A copy of the judgment is available  here C65YX969 Holley v…

TRIAL JUDGE SHOULD HAVE FOUND THAT THE CLAIMANT HAD BEEN FLUSHED OUT AND WAS FUNDAMENTALLY DISHONEST: HIGH COURT ALLOWS APPEAL

TRIAL JUDGE SHOULD HAVE FOUND THAT THE CLAIMANT HAD BEEN FLUSHED OUT AND WAS FUNDAMENTALLY DISHONEST: HIGH COURT ALLOWS APPEAL

March 10, 2020 · by gexall · in Appeals, Civil evidence, Fundamental Dishonesty, Members Content, Witness statements

In Roberts v Kesson & Anor [2020] EWHC 521 (QB) Mr Justice Jay allowed a defendant’s appeal and held that the trial judge should have found the claimant to be fundamentally dishonest.   The fact that the claimant had been “flushed…

THE PROBLEMS THAT CAN OCCUR WHEN A LAWYER MAKES A STATEMENT ON THEIR CLIENT'S BEHALF: "I ATTACH NO WEIGHT TO WHAT HE SAYS"

THE PROBLEMS THAT CAN OCCUR WHEN A LAWYER MAKES A STATEMENT ON THEIR CLIENT’S BEHALF: “I ATTACH NO WEIGHT TO WHAT HE SAYS”

March 4, 2020 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil evidence, Members Content, Witness statements

This blog has looked, many times, at the pitfalls that can occur when lawyers make statements on behalf of their clients.  An example can be seen in the judge of Mr Justice Edis in Cobussen Principal Investment Holdings Ltd v…

APPLICATIONS TO THE COURT AND THE DUTY OF CANDOUR: THE JUDGE MUST SEE DOCUMENTS THAT ARE ADVERSE TO YOUR CASE

APPLICATIONS TO THE COURT AND THE DUTY OF CANDOUR: THE JUDGE MUST SEE DOCUMENTS THAT ARE ADVERSE TO YOUR CASE

February 23, 2020 · by gexall · in Applications, Conduct, Injunctions, Members Content, Witness statements

In Short & Ors, R (On the Application Of) v Police Misconduct Tribunal & Anor [2020] EWHC 385 (Admin)  Mr Justice Saini issued a warning about the duty of candour owed to the court, particularly on a without notice application….

THE VULNERABLE CLAIMANT GIVING EVIDENCE: GROUND RULES AND INTERMEDIARIES: "I HAVE STRONG RESERVATIONS ABOUT WHETHER ANY OF THE GROUND RULES WERE NECESSARY"

THE VULNERABLE CLAIMANT GIVING EVIDENCE: GROUND RULES AND INTERMEDIARIES: “I HAVE STRONG RESERVATIONS ABOUT WHETHER ANY OF THE GROUND RULES WERE NECESSARY”

February 21, 2020 · by gexall · in Advocacy, Applications, Civil evidence, Members Content, Witness statements

In the judgment today  in Morrow v Shrewsbury Rugby Union Football Club Ltd [2020] EWHC 379 (QB) Mrs Justice Farbey considered a case that involved a vulnerable claimant.  The judgment contains some scepticism as to whether  the ground rules set…

NEW MANDATORY REQUIREMENTS FOR WITNESS STATEMENTS IN APRIL: STATE THE PROCESS BY WHICH THE STATEMENT WAS OBTAINED

NEW MANDATORY REQUIREMENTS FOR WITNESS STATEMENTS IN APRIL: STATE THE PROCESS BY WHICH THE STATEMENT WAS OBTAINED

February 21, 2020 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Rule Changes, Witness statements

It is worth isolating one aspect of the changes to the rules relating to witness statements coming into force in April as a result of  The 113th update to Practice Direction Amendments.   That is the mandatory obligation in every witness statement…

THE IMPORTANCE OF THE STATEMENT OF TRUTH (3): THE SCARY STUFF (THE REALLY SCARY STUFF)

THE IMPORTANCE OF THE STATEMENT OF TRUTH (3): THE SCARY STUFF (THE REALLY SCARY STUFF)

February 17, 2020 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Statements of Case, Statements of Truth, Witness statements

This is the third (and final) post in the series that examines the importance of the statement of truth.  Here we look at the clear and start warnings given by the courts about the importance of the statement of truth….

MORE RULE CHANGES IN APRIL: CHANGES TO THE STATEMENT OF TRUTH: YOU HAVE BEEN WARNED...

MORE RULE CHANGES IN APRIL: CHANGES TO THE STATEMENT OF TRUTH: YOU HAVE BEEN WARNED…

February 14, 2020 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Rule Changes, Statements of Truth, Witness statements

We are returning to the 113th update to Practice Direction Amendments.  This introduces important changes to to the wording of the statement of truth.  (Coming into force from the 6th April 2020). THE AMENDMENT The amendment makes changes to the…

WITNESS STATEMENT SERVED 28 DAYS LATE: RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS REFUSED: ACTION STRUCK OUT: THE PERILS OF DELIBERATELY NOT COMPLYING WITH DIRECTIONS

WITNESS STATEMENT SERVED 28 DAYS LATE: RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS REFUSED: ACTION STRUCK OUT: THE PERILS OF DELIBERATELY NOT COMPLYING WITH DIRECTIONS

February 11, 2020 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Relief from sanctions, Striking out, Witness statements

I am grateful to barrister Andrew Worthley for drawing my attention to, and sending me a note of the decision in Syed -v- Shah [2020] 2 WLUK 15 where Trower J upheld a decision not to grant a claimant relief…

A WITNESS STATEMENT "SIGNED OFF ON, WITH INSUFFICIENT CONSIDERATION AND SCRUTINY"

A WITNESS STATEMENT “SIGNED OFF ON, WITH INSUFFICIENT CONSIDERATION AND SCRUTINY”

February 10, 2020 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Members Content, Witness statements

Lawyers are always, one would hope, telling clients and witnesses to read draft witness statements with care prior to signing them. An example of the problems that a failure to consider the matter in detail can be seen in the…

WITNESS STATEMENTS, WITNESS EVIDENCE AND SELF-PROTECTION FOR THE LAWYER

WITNESS STATEMENTS, WITNESS EVIDENCE AND SELF-PROTECTION FOR THE LAWYER

February 5, 2020 · by gexall · in Avoiding negligence claims, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Conduct, Members Content, Witness statements

Every few years I repeat advice given in relation to the need for “self-protection” when drafting witness statements.  This is often caused by something I have seen in practice, questions I am asked, or a transcript of a case.  The…

← Previous 1 … 9 10 11 … 24 Next →

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email. Subscription notifies you of a new post, it does not give you access to members' content.

Join 12.3K other subscribers

Recent Posts

  • CHILDREN AND FATAL ACCIDENT LITIGATION 2026: WEBINAR 30th JUNE 2026
  • COST BITES 406: CAN A PARTY RECOVER UNNECESSARY COSTS AS DAMAGES? THE CONSEQUENCES OF AN UNNECESSARY SECOND ACTION CONSIDERED IN THE HIGH COURT
  • THE WEBINAR ON THE SRA GUIDANCE ON EFFECTIVE SUPERVISION: WHAT LITIGATION FIRMS NEED TO KNOW: TOGETHER WITH LOTS OF CHECKLISTS AND TEMPLATESNOW AVAILABLE “ON DEMAND”
  • COST BITES 405: SHOULD A SUCCESSFUL CLAIMANT’S CONDUCT LEAD TO A DEDUCTION OF 45% OF THEIR COSTS? A TOOTH DECISION…
  • SHOULD THE COURT ALLOW A “NEWLY APPOINTED” EMPLOYEE TO REPRESENT A LIMITED COMPANY AT A HEARING?

Top Posts

NEW COURT FEES COMING INTO FORCE ON THE 13th JULY 2026: SOME BRAND NEW PROVISIONS AND THE INFLATIONARY INCREASES: THE CIVIL AND FAMILY COURTS, THE MAGISTRATES' COURT, THE LANDS CHAMBER (AND MANY OTHERS)
A NEW SERIES OF USEFUL ONLINE CALCULATORS FOR LITIGATORS AND THE LEGAL PROFESSION (WITH A 20% DISCOUNT FOR CLB READERS): MAKING IT ALL ADD UP
BACK TO BASICS MONDAY: MAKING AN APPLICATION TO THE COURT: HOW TO AVOID PROBLEMS: KEY POINTS AND SOME USEFUL CHECKLISTS
COST BITES 404: JUDGE ORDERS DEFENDANT TO PAY COSTS ON THE INDEMNITY BASIS: PARTIES HAVE AN OBLIGATION TO ENGAGE WITH THE PROCESS OF LITIGATION: "THEY SHOULD BE USING NON-COURT BASED DISPUTE RESOLUTION WHEREVER POSSIBLE"
THE COURT OF APPEAL OVERTURNS A JUDICIAL REVIEW DECISION IN FAVOUR OF A SOLICITOR: THE OMBUDSMAN GOT NOTHING WRONG (QUITE A LOT HERE ABOUT VULNERABLE CLIENTS AS WELL...)

Archives

Blogroll

  • Fatal Accident Law
  • Legal Futures
  • Personal injury: Liability and Damages

Books

  • Munkman & Exall on Damages for Personal Injuries and Death 15th ed
  • The APIL Guide to Fatal Accidents 4th edition

Useful Links

  • Buntools (for preparing PDF Bundles)
  • Kings Chambers
  • Kings Chambers Costs & Litigation Funding
  • Kings Chambers Serious Injury
  • The Civil Procedure Rules
  • The Law Society Gazette
  • The National Archives Recently Published Judgments
  • The Senior Court Costs Office Guide 2025
  • www.Bailii.org

Copyright

© Gordon Exall, Exall Legal Training, Civil Litigation Brief, 2013-2026. Unauthorised use and or duplication of the material contained on this blog without permission is strictly prohibited.
Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.

To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
  • Membership Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Advertising Policy
  • Copyright
  • Legal Disclaimer

Copyright © 2026 Civil Litigation Brief ®

Powered by Big Yellow Workshop

Loading Comments...

You must be logged in to post a comment.