Civil Litigation Brief ®
Menu
  • Home
  • About
  • Membership Plans
  • Webinars
  • Login

Updates and Commentary on Civil Procedure, by Gordon Exall, Barrister, Kings Chambers

Browse: Page 54
JUDGE GRANTS SUMMARY JUDGMENT AGAINST CLAIMANT IN ACTION AGAINST SOLICITORS AND LEADING COUNSEL

JUDGE GRANTS SUMMARY JUDGMENT AGAINST CLAIMANT IN ACTION AGAINST SOLICITORS AND LEADING COUNSEL

April 21, 2022 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Clinical Negligence, Members Content, Summary judgment

In Coote -v- Ullstein [2022] EWHC 606 (QB) His Honour Judge Gosnell (sitting as a judge of the High Court) granted the defendants’ applications for summary judgment in relation to a professional negligence claim being brought against them.  The judge…

PROVING THINGS 229: WHO BEARS THE BURDEN OF PROOF WHEN A CLAIMANT SEEKS DAMAGES GROSS OF TAXATION

PROVING THINGS 229: WHO BEARS THE BURDEN OF PROOF WHEN A CLAIMANT SEEKS DAMAGES GROSS OF TAXATION

April 20, 2022 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Damages, Members Content, Personal Injury

We are returning for the second, but not the last, time to the judgment of Mrs Justice Hill in Mathieu v Hinds & Anor [2022] EWHC 924 (QB). The judge awarded an injured claimant damages for loss of earnings gross of tax. …

PROVING THINGS 228: PLEADING AND PROVING MITIGATION OF LOSS: THE NEED FOR A DEFENDANT TO ESTABLISH A "CONCRETE CASE"

PROVING THINGS 228: PLEADING AND PROVING MITIGATION OF LOSS: THE NEED FOR A DEFENDANT TO ESTABLISH A “CONCRETE CASE”

April 19, 2022 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Damages, Members Content, Personal Injury

The judgment of Mrs Justice Hill in Mathieu v Hinds & Anor [2022] EWHC 924 (QB) is interesting for a large number of reasons. Here we look at the judgment in relation to pleading and proving mitigation of loss. “A…

INTEREST ON COSTS: WHAT IS THE APPROPRIATE RATE TO BE PAID IN A CLAIM RELATING TO AN ESTATE

INTEREST ON COSTS: WHAT IS THE APPROPRIATE RATE TO BE PAID IN A CLAIM RELATING TO AN ESTATE

April 14, 2022 · by gexall · in Civil Procedure, Interest, Members Content

In Almond v Goff & Ors [2021] EWHC 1703 (Ch) Ms Clare Ambrose, sitting as a High Court judge, considered the appropriate rate of interest on costs in a claim concerning an estate.  She rejected the argument that interest ran…

EXCESSIVE COSTS INCURRED IN ARGUING ABOUT COSTS: A PARTY OBTAINING RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS WAS CORRECTLY ORDERED TO PAY THE COSTS OF THE APPLICATION: "RULES EXIST FOR A REASON"

EXCESSIVE COSTS INCURRED IN ARGUING ABOUT COSTS: A PARTY OBTAINING RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS WAS CORRECTLY ORDERED TO PAY THE COSTS OF THE APPLICATION: “RULES EXIST FOR A REASON”

April 14, 2022 · by gexall · in Appeals, Assessment of Costs, Costs, Members Content, Relief from sanctions, Setting aside judgment

In  Swivel UK Ltd v Tecnolumen GmbH & Anor [2022] EWHC 825 (Ch) Mr Justice Marcus Smith upheld the decision of a Master that a party that had obtained relief from sanctions should pay the costs of the application.  It…

WITNESS STATEMENTS AND LANGUAGE DIFFICULTIES: JUDGE EXAMINES THE "MINEFIELD" FOR THE LITIGANT

WITNESS STATEMENTS AND LANGUAGE DIFFICULTIES: JUDGE EXAMINES THE “MINEFIELD” FOR THE LITIGANT

April 14, 2022 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Members Content, Witness statements

In Bahia v Sidhu & Anor [2022] EWHC 875 (Ch) Mrs Justice Joanna Smith considered the problems that arose when a witness provided a statement in English but was not totally proficient in that language.  The decision to provide the…

A SERIES OF WEBINARS ON FATAL ACCIDENT LITIGATION AND DAMAGES: JUNE 2022

A SERIES OF WEBINARS ON FATAL ACCIDENT LITIGATION AND DAMAGES: JUNE 2022

April 14, 2022 · by gexall · in Fatal Accidents, Members Content, Webinar

There are a series of four webinars in June 2022 on key aspects of fatal accident litigation and damages. Looking at recent cases, the child claimant and fatal accidents, damages in anticipation of death and avoiding the pitfalls of fatal…

HIGH COURT ISSUES A WARNING TO THOSE PLEADING CLAIM FOR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES: THERE MUST BE A PROPER BASIS FOR SUCH A PLEA

HIGH COURT ISSUES A WARNING TO THOSE PLEADING CLAIM FOR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES: THERE MUST BE A PROPER BASIS FOR SUCH A PLEA

April 14, 2022 · by gexall · in Civil Procedure, Members Content, Statements of Case

In Underwood & Anor v Bounty UK Ltd & Anor [2022] EWHC 888 (QB) Mr Justice Nicklin sent out a warning about the pleading a claim for exemplary damages. Such claims should only be made where there is a proper…

“IT SHOULD BE UNDERSTOOD THAT DELIBERATE FLOUTING OF ORDERS, GUIDANCE AND PROCEDURE IS A FORM OF FORENSIC CHEATING AND SHOULD BE TREATED AS SUCH”

April 13, 2022 · by gexall · in Case Management, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content

In Xanthopoulos v Rakshina [2022] EWFC 30 Mr Justice Mostyn considered some key aspects of procedure, including costs and transparency.  Here we look at that part of the judgment that deals with compliance with the rules.   “This utter disregard…

WHEN A WITNESS GIVES DIFFERENT ACCOUNTS IN DIFFERENT STATEMENTS IT RARELY HELPS THEIR CASE: JUDGE FINDS IT "UNIMPRESSIVE"

WHEN A WITNESS GIVES DIFFERENT ACCOUNTS IN DIFFERENT STATEMENTS IT RARELY HELPS THEIR CASE: JUDGE FINDS IT “UNIMPRESSIVE”

April 12, 2022 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Members Content, Personal Injury, Witness statements

In Parry v Johnson & Anor (Rev1) [2022] EWHC 889 (QB) Mr Justice Ritchie considered the evidence of the defendant driver in a road traffic case.  The defendant’s different accounts on different occasions did not help his cause.  The judge…

THE COURT SHOULD ASSESS COSTS SUMMARILY NOW: BUT THEY ARE SUBJECT TO A "SIGNIFICANT HAIRCUT"

THE COURT SHOULD ASSESS COSTS SUMMARILY NOW: BUT THEY ARE SUBJECT TO A “SIGNIFICANT HAIRCUT”

April 12, 2022 · by gexall · in Applications, Assessment of Costs, Costs, Members Content, Summary assessment,

One of the things I regularly do on this blog is to post judgments relating to the summary assessment of costs.  These are not readily available elsewhere and this type of judgment is very popular with readers. The judgment of…

COURT REFUSES DEFENDANT'S APPLICATION THAT DEFENDANT'S KENYAN WITNESSES SHOULD APPEAR BY VIDEO LINK:

COURT REFUSES DEFENDANT’S APPLICATION THAT DEFENDANT’S KENYAN WITNESSES SHOULD APPEAR BY VIDEO LINK:

April 12, 2022 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil evidence, Members Content, Remote hearings

In  Jackson v Hayes & Jarvis (Travel) Ltd [2022] EWHC 453 (QB) Mrs Justice Eady refused the defendant’s application that its witnesses give evidence by video link from Kenya. “I am left with, on the one hand, an absence of…

JUDGE VARIES ORDER SO SUMMARY ASSESSMENT OF COSTS REPLACES DETAILED ASSESSMENT: COSTS SUMMARILY ASSESSED AT £7,250,000

JUDGE VARIES ORDER SO SUMMARY ASSESSMENT OF COSTS REPLACES DETAILED ASSESSMENT: COSTS SUMMARILY ASSESSED AT £7,250,000

April 11, 2022 · by gexall · in Applications, Assessment of Costs, Costs, Members Content

In Pipia v Bgeo Group Ltd [2022] EWHC 846 (Comm) Mr Justice Henshaw took the unusual step of replacing an order for detailed assessment with an order for a summary assessment and then assessing the costs. THE CASE The defendant…

DEFENDANTS HAVE TO PAY COSTS OF ATE PREMIUM: DEEMED ORDER FOR COSTS FOLLOWING ACCEPTANCE OF PART 36 OFFER INCLUDES THE COSTS THE ATE PREMIUM

DEFENDANTS HAVE TO PAY COSTS OF ATE PREMIUM: DEEMED ORDER FOR COSTS FOLLOWING ACCEPTANCE OF PART 36 OFFER INCLUDES THE COSTS THE ATE PREMIUM

April 10, 2022 · by gexall · in Assessment of Costs, Clinical Negligence, Costs, Members Content

In Dance v East Kent University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust & Ors [2022] EWHC B9 (Costs) Costs Judge Leonard considered two ingenious arguments where the defendants attempted to avoid paying the claimant’s ATE premium.  This involved consideration of the deemed…

LITIGATION FRIEND GAVE FALSE EVIDENCE AND WAS IN CONTEMPT OF COURT: "GOOD DAYS" DOES NOT EXPLAIN CLAIMANT'S LEADING THEATRICAL ROLES

LITIGATION FRIEND GAVE FALSE EVIDENCE AND WAS IN CONTEMPT OF COURT: “GOOD DAYS” DOES NOT EXPLAIN CLAIMANT’S LEADING THEATRICAL ROLES

April 8, 2022 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Clinical Negligence, Committal proceedings, Fundamental Dishonesty, Members Content, Witness statements

In Hull University Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust v Colley [2022] EWHC 854 (QB) Mr Justice Bourne sentenced a litigation friend to six months in prison (suspended for two years) for giving false evidence in support of her daughter’s claim for…

APPLICATION FOR RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS REFUSED IN GROUP LITIGATION ORDER

APPLICATION FOR RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS REFUSED IN GROUP LITIGATION ORDER

April 8, 2022 · by gexall · in Applications, Members Content, Personal Injury, Relief from sanctions

In Baker & Ors v Volkswagen Aktiengesellschaft & Ors (VW NOx Emissions Group Litigation) [2022] EWHC 810 (QB) Senior Master Fontaine refused the applicants’ application for relief from sanctions in relation to their inclusion in a register for a Group…

THE COURT WILL GRANT A DECLARATION THAT AN ED SHEERAN SONG DID NOT BREACH COPYWRIGHT: OH WHY PUT YOURSELF THROUGH THIS

April 6, 2022 · by gexall · in Civil Procedure, Expert evidence, Experts, Members Content

The judgment of Mr Justice Zacarolli in Sheeran & Ors v Chokri & Ors [2022] EWHC 827 (Ch) contains some observations as to why the court should grant a declaration that a song had not breached another composer’s copyright.  The…

APPEALING FACTS IN THE COURT OF APPEAL: "ISLAND HOPPING" IS HARD TO DO

APPEALING FACTS IN THE COURT OF APPEAL: “ISLAND HOPPING” IS HARD TO DO

April 6, 2022 · by gexall · in Appeals, Members Content

In Volpi & Anor v Volpi [2022] EWCA Civ 464 the Court of Appeal highlighted the difficulties an appellant faces when seeking to appeal findings of fact.  Such appeals are not always unsuccessful, however the appellant faces a very difficult…

LEADING COUNSEL MAY HAVE BEEN IN CONTEMPT OF COURT: "LAWYERS INVOLVED IN CASES OF THIS KIND HAVE A PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY TO INFORM THEMSELVES ABOUT THE RULES AND ABIDE BY THEM"

LEADING COUNSEL MAY HAVE BEEN IN CONTEMPT OF COURT: “LAWYERS INVOLVED IN CASES OF THIS KIND HAVE A PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY TO INFORM THEMSELVES ABOUT THE RULES AND ABIDE BY THEM”

April 5, 2022 · by gexall · in Appeals, Civil Procedure, Members Content

There has been a number of judgments recently concerning the disclosure of embargoed judgments. The Court of Appeal decision in   Griffiths  v Tickle & Ors (Re Disclosure by Counsel for Appellant and Application by First Respondent)  [2022] EWCA Civ 465…

IF YOU WANT HOURLY RATES HIGHER THAN THE GUIDELINE FIGURES YOU HAVE TO PROVIDE "A CLEAR AND COMPELLING JUSTIFICATION": COURT OF APPEAL DECISION  TODAY

IF YOU WANT HOURLY RATES HIGHER THAN THE GUIDELINE FIGURES YOU HAVE TO PROVIDE “A CLEAR AND COMPELLING JUSTIFICATION”: COURT OF APPEAL DECISION TODAY

April 5, 2022 · by gexall · in Appeals, Costs, Members Content

In  Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd & Ors v LG Display Co. Ltd & Anor (Costs) [2022] EWCA Civ 466 the Court of Appeal sent out a clear message that if a party wants hourly rates outside the guideline rates then…

ANOTHER FAILED SERVICE CASE: AGREEMENT TO ACCEPT SERVICE BY EMAIL DID NOT EXTEND TO DOCUMENTS ALREADY SENT

ANOTHER FAILED SERVICE CASE: AGREEMENT TO ACCEPT SERVICE BY EMAIL DID NOT EXTEND TO DOCUMENTS ALREADY SENT

April 5, 2022 · by gexall · in Applications, Avoiding negligence claims, Members Content, Service of the claim form, Serving documents, Webinar

We have another case falling foul of the provisions in relation to service. In Allen v Mittal [2022] EWHC 762 (Ch) Deputy Insolvency and Companies Court Judge Agnello QC rejected an applicant’s arguments that an application had been served properly. …

ASSESSING WITNESS CREDIBILITY: CREDIBILITY IS NOT NECESSARILY THE SAME THING AS HONESTY

ASSESSING WITNESS CREDIBILITY: CREDIBILITY IS NOT NECESSARILY THE SAME THING AS HONESTY

April 4, 2022 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Members Content

Here I want to discuss the issue of witness (and client) credibility.  Many cases will turn on credibility and any litigator has to be able to make an assessment of this  when taking a case on; before issuing proceedings and…

USING THE DAMAGES CLAIM PILOT PRACTICE DIRECTION FROM TODAY ONWARDS: SIGN UP AND SEE THE MOVIE

USING THE DAMAGES CLAIM PILOT PRACTICE DIRECTION FROM TODAY ONWARDS: SIGN UP AND SEE THE MOVIE

April 4, 2022 · by gexall · in Case Management, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Rule Changes

The HMCTS weekly update yesterday stated “From Monday 4 April 2022, legal professionals issuing claims for damages that fall under the scope of Practice Direction 51ZB should use the Damages Claim service on MyHMCTS.” SIGN UP Legal professionals acting for…

CLAIMANT'S APPLICATION FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME TO SERVE PARTICULAR OF CLAIM REFUSED: A CASE THAT WAS IN THE "LAST CHANCE SALOON" FOR FAR TOO LONG

CLAIMANT’S APPLICATION FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME TO SERVE PARTICULAR OF CLAIM REFUSED: A CASE THAT WAS IN THE “LAST CHANCE SALOON” FOR FAR TOO LONG

April 4, 2022 · by gexall · in Applications, Extensions of time, Members Content, Relief from sanctions

In  CDE v Buckinghamshire County Council [2022] EWHC 738 (QB) Master Thornett rejected a claimant’s application for an extension of time for service of the particulars of claim. The action had a long history with a pattern of delay on…

UPDATE ON USEFUL LINKS ON STRESS, LAWYERS AND LAW: TIPS FOR A LESS STRESSFUL LIFE AND PRACTICE

UPDATE ON USEFUL LINKS ON STRESS, LAWYERS AND LAW: TIPS FOR A LESS STRESSFUL LIFE AND PRACTICE

April 3, 2022 · by gexall · in Members Content, Useful links, Well being

Periodically I reproduce and update available guidance on stress for lawyers.  Here are useful links to posts about preventing, and dealing with, stress as a lawyer and litigator. HELPFUL LINKS Ulaw blog considers research that looked at thousands of lawyers in…

TAILOR YOUR SUBMISSIONS TO KEEP TO TIME: A CODA TO A JUDGMENT - WITH A FAMILIAR THEME

TAILOR YOUR SUBMISSIONS TO KEEP TO TIME: A CODA TO A JUDGMENT – WITH A FAMILIAR THEME

April 1, 2022 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil Procedure, Members Content

There is another aspect of the judgment of Richard Salter QC (sitting as a Deputy Judge of the High Court) in  Al Saud & Anor v Gibbs & Anor [2022] EWHC 706 (Comm) looked at earlier this week.  A “Coda” to…

COURT ALLOWS CLAIMANT'S APPEAL AGAINST FINDING OF FUNDAMENTAL DISHONESTY: THE DEFENDANT SHOULD HAVE GIVEN NOTICE OF THE ISSUES AND MADE ITS CASE CLEAR

COURT ALLOWS CLAIMANT’S APPEAL AGAINST FINDING OF FUNDAMENTAL DISHONESTY: THE DEFENDANT SHOULD HAVE GIVEN NOTICE OF THE ISSUES AND MADE ITS CASE CLEAR

March 31, 2022 · by gexall · in Fundamental Dishonesty, Members Content, Personal Injury

In  Jenkinson v Robertson [2022] EWHC 756 (Admin) Mr Justice Choudhury set aside a trial judge’s finding of fundamental dishonesty on the part of a claimant.  This is a judgment that highlights the need for defendants to give clear notice…

PART 18 REQUESTS SHOULD NOT BE AUTOMATIC ASPECT OF LITIGATION, NOR SHOULD THEY BE MADE AS A MATTER OF ROUTINE: HIGH COURT DECISION

PART 18 REQUESTS SHOULD NOT BE AUTOMATIC ASPECT OF LITIGATION, NOR SHOULD THEY BE MADE AS A MATTER OF ROUTINE: HIGH COURT DECISION

March 31, 2022 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content

The judgment of Richard Salter QC (sitting as a Deputy Judge of the High Court) in  Al Saud & Anor v Gibbs & Anor [2022] EWHC 706 (Comm) contains a detailed consideration of the rules and case law relating to…

COURT OF APPEAL UPHOLDS DECISION SETTING ASIDE AN EXTENSION OF TIME FOR SERVICE OF THE CLAIM FORM: CASE ON HEAD OF ALEXANDER THE GREAT GOES BUST

COURT OF APPEAL UPHOLDS DECISION SETTING ASIDE AN EXTENSION OF TIME FOR SERVICE OF THE CLAIM FORM: CASE ON HEAD OF ALEXANDER THE GREAT GOES BUST

March 30, 2022 · by gexall · in Appeals, Members Content, Service of the claim form, Serving documents

In  Qatar Investment and Project Development Holding Company & Anor v Phoenix Ancient Art SA (Rev1) [2022] EWCA Civ 422 the Court of Appeal upheld a decision setting aside an order granting an extension of time for service of the…

COURT OF APPEAL UPHOLDS AN ORDER THAT NO COSTS BE ORDERED ON AN APPEAL

COURT OF APPEAL UPHOLDS AN ORDER THAT NO COSTS BE ORDERED ON AN APPEAL

March 30, 2022 · by gexall · in Appeals, Costs, Members Content, Relief from sanctions

In South Lodge Flats Limited v Malik [2022] EWCA Civ 411 the Court of Appeal upheld a decision that no order for costs be made on an appeal.  The defendants had succeeded in the appeal but required the indulgence of…

WHEN SOLICITORS APPLY TO COME OFF THE RECORD:  THE RETAINER, DISCONTINUANCE AND CASE MANAGEMENT ISSUES CONSIDERED

WHEN SOLICITORS APPLY TO COME OFF THE RECORD: THE RETAINER, DISCONTINUANCE AND CASE MANAGEMENT ISSUES CONSIDERED

March 29, 2022 · by gexall · in Applications, Members Content

Judgments in relation to applications to come off the record are rare.  The issue was considered by Mr Justice Turner in Wilson & Ors v Bayer Pharma AG & Ors [2022] EWHC 670 (QB).  The judge considered the application to…

WHEN DEFENDANTS MAKE AN APPLICATION IN RELATION TO SERVICE: WHAT METHOD MUST THEY USE? IS PART 11 MANDATORY?

WHEN DEFENDANTS MAKE AN APPLICATION IN RELATION TO SERVICE: WHAT METHOD MUST THEY USE? IS PART 11 MANDATORY?

March 28, 2022 · by gexall · in Applications, Members Content, Service of the claim form

We are taking a second look at the judgment of Lord Justice Nugee in Hand Held Products, Inc & Anor v Zebra Technologies Europe Ltd & Anor [2022] EWHC 640 (Ch). This time in relation to that part of the…

"LEGAL PROCEEDINGS DO NOT EXIST FOR THE PURPOSE OF PERMITTING PARTIES TO PUT IRRELEVANT MATTERS INTO THE PUBLIC DOMAIN": EVIDENCE ON BEHALF OF THE DUKE OF SUSSEX IS CURTAILED

“LEGAL PROCEEDINGS DO NOT EXIST FOR THE PURPOSE OF PERMITTING PARTIES TO PUT IRRELEVANT MATTERS INTO THE PUBLIC DOMAIN”: EVIDENCE ON BEHALF OF THE DUKE OF SUSSEX IS CURTAILED

March 28, 2022 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Witness statements

In  The Duke of Sussex, R (On the Application Of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2022] EWHC 682 (Admin)  Mr Justice Swift excluded irrelevant material in witness statements and other documents.  He also refused the claimant’s request…

TWO CLAIMANTS - TWO SETS OF COSTS:  JUDGMENT ON FIXED COSTS REGIME

TWO CLAIMANTS – TWO SETS OF COSTS: JUDGMENT ON FIXED COSTS REGIME

March 25, 2022 · by gexall · in Costs, Fixed Costs, Members Content

In Melloy & Anor v UK Insurance Ltd [2022] EW Misc 4 (CC) HHJ Glen decided that where there are two claimants in a fixed costs case then each claimant is entitled to a separate award of costs under Section…

SERVING THE CLAIM  FORM PROPERLY - THE DIRE PROBLEMS IF YOU DON'T, AND THE LESSONS TO BE LEARNT FROM GOOD LAW: WEBINAR 11th APRIL 2022

SERVING THE CLAIM FORM PROPERLY – THE DIRE PROBLEMS IF YOU DON’T, AND THE LESSONS TO BE LEARNT FROM GOOD LAW: WEBINAR 11th APRIL 2022

March 24, 2022 · by gexall · in Avoiding negligence claims, Members Content, Service of the claim form, Serving documents, Webinar

The decision of the Court of Appeal  today in The Good Law Project, R (On the Application Of) v The Secretary of State for Health And Social Care [2022] EWCA Civ 35 emphasises the need for all litigators to know,…

COURT OF APPEAL DISMISSES APPEAL WHEN CLAIM FORM SERVED ONE DAY LATE: "RELIANCE ON NON-COMPLIANT SERVICE IS NOT ONE OF THE INSTANCES OF OPPORTUNISM DEPRECATED BY THE COURTS"

COURT OF APPEAL DISMISSES APPEAL WHEN CLAIM FORM SERVED ONE DAY LATE: “RELIANCE ON NON-COMPLIANT SERVICE IS NOT ONE OF THE INSTANCES OF OPPORTUNISM DEPRECATED BY THE COURTS”

March 24, 2022 · by gexall · in Appeals, Applications, Members Content, Service of the claim form

In The Good Law Project, R (On the Application Of) v The Secretary of State for Health And Social Care [2022] EWCA Civ 35 the Court of Appeal dismissed the claimant’s appeal against a a decision not granting any relief…

CLAIMANT FAILS TO SERVE CLAIM FORM PROPERLY: NOT A PLACE WHERE THIS DEFENDANT CARRIED OUT BUSINESS: SERVING THE RIGHT ZEBRA AND THE RIGHT ADDRESS

CLAIMANT FAILS TO SERVE CLAIM FORM PROPERLY: NOT A PLACE WHERE THIS DEFENDANT CARRIED OUT BUSINESS: SERVING THE RIGHT ZEBRA AND THE RIGHT ADDRESS

March 24, 2022 · by gexall · in Applications, Members Content, Service of the claim form

Master McCloud once wrote that it was the months of April and May that led to a seasonal crop of claim form issues in the Masters’ corridor. However, as regular readers this blog will know the season is a very…

TEXTING WHILE DRIVING AND CIVIL LIABILITY: JUDGES KNOW, YOU KNOW: "A CONCLUSION I REACH WITHOUT ENTHUSIASM BUT THE EVIDENCE IS COMPELLING"

TEXTING WHILE DRIVING AND CIVIL LIABILITY: JUDGES KNOW, YOU KNOW: “A CONCLUSION I REACH WITHOUT ENTHUSIASM BUT THE EVIDENCE IS COMPELLING”

March 23, 2022 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Members Content, Personal Injury

In HRA v KGC [2022] EWHC 650 (QB) Mr Justice Turner considered the question of liability. It is an example of a phone record playing a part in the decision that the defendant was negligent.  The judge found that the…

PROVING THINGS 227: FAILURE TO PROVE A DEBT CLAIM: "THE PROOF REQUIRED TO DEMONSTRATE THAT THE CLAIMANT IS ENTITLED TO THE SUMS WHICH IT CLAIMS IS SADLY LACKING"

PROVING THINGS 227: FAILURE TO PROVE A DEBT CLAIM: “THE PROOF REQUIRED TO DEMONSTRATE THAT THE CLAIMANT IS ENTITLED TO THE SUMS WHICH IT CLAIMS IS SADLY LACKING”

March 23, 2022 · by gexall · in Appeals, Case Management, Civil evidence, Damages, Members Content

The judgment of Mr Justice Turner in Emery Planning Partnership Ltd v Bevan [2022] EWHC 494 (QB) illustrates a failure by a claimant to prove a debt claim.  It is (yet another) object lesson that facts and evidence are needed…

ANOTHER CASE OF A JUDGMENT EMBARGO BEING BREACHED: ALL RECIPIENTS NEED TO UNDERSTAND THE IMPORTANCE AND BREADTH OF THE EMBARGO ON DRAFT JUDGMENTS

ANOTHER CASE OF A JUDGMENT EMBARGO BEING BREACHED: ALL RECIPIENTS NEED TO UNDERSTAND THE IMPORTANCE AND BREADTH OF THE EMBARGO ON DRAFT JUDGMENTS

March 23, 2022 · by gexall · in Appeals, Civil Procedure, Conduct, Members Content

In The Public Institution for Social Security v Banque Pictet & Cie SA & Ors [2022] EWCA Civ 368 the Court of Appeal considered yet another case of breach of an embargoed judgment. There was clearly a breach (somewhere) which…

A CLAIMANT WHO OBTAINS AN ORDER UNDER SECTION 33 IS "SUCCESSFUL": COSTS, CONDUCT AND INTERIM PAYMENTS ON ACCOUNT OF COSTS CONSIDERED

A CLAIMANT WHO OBTAINS AN ORDER UNDER SECTION 33 IS “SUCCESSFUL”: COSTS, CONDUCT AND INTERIM PAYMENTS ON ACCOUNT OF COSTS CONSIDERED

March 23, 2022 · by gexall · in Conduct, Costs, Interim Payments, Limitation, Members Content

In Aderounmu v Colvin (Costs) [2022] EWHC 637 (QB) Master David Cook made an order for costs in favour of a claimant who had succeeded on a preliminary issue.  A discount was made because certain aspects of the case had…

"WHY IS IT FAIR FOR ONE PARTY TO FOLLOW THE RULES, BUT THE OTHER PARTY TO IGNORE THEM": PAINTING THE OTHER PARTY IN PERJORATIVE TERMS WILL NOT ASSIST YOUR CASE

“WHY IS IT FAIR FOR ONE PARTY TO FOLLOW THE RULES, BUT THE OTHER PARTY TO IGNORE THEM”: PAINTING THE OTHER PARTY IN PERJORATIVE TERMS WILL NOT ASSIST YOUR CASE

March 22, 2022 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Conduct, Members Content, Witness statements

In WC v HC (Financial Remedies Agreements) [2022] EWFC 22 Mr Justice Peel had some stringent criticisms of the way in which a party attempted to bypass the rules on witness statement length. Also he highlighted the futility of making…

"IT IS INAPPROPRIATE FOR JUDGES THESE DAYS TO BE EMAILING ADVOCATES ASKING THEM TO UNDERTAKE TASKS AT THE WEEKEND": PART OF A JUDGMENT

“IT IS INAPPROPRIATE FOR JUDGES THESE DAYS TO BE EMAILING ADVOCATES ASKING THEM TO UNDERTAKE TASKS AT THE WEEKEND”: PART OF A JUDGMENT

March 22, 2022 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Well being

 There is much of interest in the judgment of HHJ Carter in N (A Child) (Termination of children’s guardian) [2022] EWFC B16, a case that may well be of considerable interest to family lawyers. Here I want to concentrate on…

WEBINAR ON THE SUMMARY ASSESSMENT OF COSTS: 29th MARCH 2022

WEBINAR ON THE SUMMARY ASSESSMENT OF COSTS: 29th MARCH 2022

March 22, 2022 · by gexall · in Assessment of Costs, Costs, Members Content, Summary assessment,, Webinar

On the 29th March 2022 I am presenting a webinar on the summary assessment of costs.  This takes a detailed look at the rules, practice direction and relevant guidance. Booking details are available here.  MATTERS TO BE COVERED When a…

THE INDEMNITY PRINCIPLE BITES ON A SUCCESSFUL DEFENDANT BUT NOT ON A SUCCESSFUL CLAIMANT INSURER: CLAIM £438,388.95 IN COSTS, RECOVER £1,368.75.

THE INDEMNITY PRINCIPLE BITES ON A SUCCESSFUL DEFENDANT BUT NOT ON A SUCCESSFUL CLAIMANT INSURER: CLAIM £438,388.95 IN COSTS, RECOVER £1,368.75.

March 20, 2022 · by gexall · in Assessment of Costs, Committal proceedings, Costs, Members Content

Issues relating to the indemnity principle give rise to a number of issues in litigation about costs. The principles loom large in the judgment of Costs Judge Leonard in Liverpool Victoria Insurance Co Ltd v Khan & Ors [2022] EWHC…

SERVING DOCUMENTS BY EMAIL: PETITION TO MAKE IT THE PRIMARY METHOD OF SERVICE IN CIVIL PROCEEDINGS

SERVING DOCUMENTS BY EMAIL: PETITION TO MAKE IT THE PRIMARY METHOD OF SERVICE IN CIVIL PROCEEDINGS

March 18, 2022 · by gexall · in Members Content, Serving documents

We have seen a large number of cases where parties have come to grief by attempting to serve by email in circumstances where the other party has not consented.  There is a petition to amend the rules. PRACTICE DIRECTION 6A…

COURT REFUSES TO EXTEND TIME IN HUMAN RIGHTS ACT CLAIM: THERE IS NO RIGHT TO LITIGATE - THAT IS WHAT LIMITATION IS

COURT REFUSES TO EXTEND TIME IN HUMAN RIGHTS ACT CLAIM: THERE IS NO RIGHT TO LITIGATE – THAT IS WHAT LIMITATION IS

March 18, 2022 · by gexall · in Applications, Extensions of time, Limitation, Members Content

In  Rafiq v Thurrock Borough Council [2022] EWHC 584 (QB) Mrs Justice Collins Rice refused a claimant’s for an extension of time to a claimant bringing a claim under the Human Rights Act.  The judgment is a reminder that there…

POTENTIAL CLAIMANT IN CREDIT HIRE CASE MUST GIVE PRE-ACTION DISCLOSURE OF DOCUMENTS RELEVANT TO IMPECUNIOSITY

POTENTIAL CLAIMANT IN CREDIT HIRE CASE MUST GIVE PRE-ACTION DISCLOSURE OF DOCUMENTS RELEVANT TO IMPECUNIOSITY

March 17, 2022 · by gexall · in Applications, Disclosure, Members Content

I am grateful to Garry Herring of Keoghs solicitors for sending me a copy of the judgment of HHJ Harrison in Allianz Insurance PLC -v- Holt (3rd December 2021). It is an example of the court exercising its discretion to…

EXPERT EVIDENCE: KNOWING WHERE IT CAN ALL GO WRONG  – AND AVOIDING PROBLEMS BEFORE THEY OCCUR:WEBINAR ON EXPERTS AND FOR EXPERTS: 21st MARCH 2022

EXPERT EVIDENCE: KNOWING WHERE IT CAN ALL GO WRONG – AND AVOIDING PROBLEMS BEFORE THEY OCCUR:WEBINAR ON EXPERTS AND FOR EXPERTS: 21st MARCH 2022

March 17, 2022 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Credibility of experts, Expert evidence, Experts, Members Content, Webinar

A number of recent cases have emphasised the importance of those who instruct experts, and experts themselves, being fully aware of the nature and scope of the duties of an expert.  This webinar looks at cases where experts have gone…

SOLICITORS, AIRLINES AND LIENS: SUPREME COURT DECISION

SOLICITORS, AIRLINES AND LIENS: SUPREME COURT DECISION

March 16, 2022 · by gexall · in Access to justice, Appeals, Members Content

In Bott & Co Solicitors Ltd v Ryanair DAC [2022] UKSC 8 the Supreme Court allowed an appeal from the Court of Appeal. The Court of Appeal had held that the solicitors were not providing a litigation service in the…

← Previous 1 … 53 54 55 … 147 Next →

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email. Subscription notifies you of a new post, it does not give you access to members' content.

Join 12.4K other subscribers

Recent Posts

  • LATE WITNESS STATEMENTS, RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS (OR NOT…) AND THE COURT OF APPEAL CONSIDERS “WHAT IS A TRIAL?”: THE DEFINITION PROVES TO BE VERY IMPORTANT FOR THIS APPELLANT…
  • COST BITES 417: THE LIABILITY FOR COSTS OF EACH CLAIMANT WHEN A MULTI-CLAIMANT ACTION WAS DISCONTINUED: BEING PART OF SUCH AN ACTION MAY NOT BE CHEAP…
  • EXPERT WATCH 63: WHEN A DOCTOR WRITES TO THE COURT AND THE JUDGE FINDS THE INFORMATION “UNRELIABLE”
  • THROWBACK FRIDAY: “UNNECESSARY MATERIAL, DUPLICATION AND INFORMATION OVERLOAD”: A POST FROM JULY 2016 WHICH STILL HAS ECHOES TODAY
  • EXPERT WATCH 62: ANOTHER CASE WHERE THE EXPERT DID NOT UNDERSTAND THE “BOLAM” TEST: PLUS THE DANGERS OF INSTRUCTING AN EXPERT BY A “PORTAL”

Top Posts

WHAT SHOULD A SOLICITOR DO IF A CLIENT IS PUTTING FORWARD AN ACCOUNT THAT MAY BE UNTRUE AND THEN THERE ARE "RED FLAGS"? WHEN IS THE LINE CROSSED: THE DUTIES CONSIDERED IN DETAIL
"STING OPERATIONS", SECRET AGENTS, NAIVE SOLICITORS DISCLOSING THEIR CLIENT'S PRIVILEGED INFORMATION, STRIKING OUT AND ABUSE OF PROCESS: COURT OF APPEAL DECISION HIGHLIGHTS THE MAJOR RISKS OF "PRIVILEGE HUNTING"
THE RULES ARE CHANGING: ADVANCE NOTICE: GOODBYE TO THE CHANCERY DIVISION
CAN THE WAY IN WHICH A CLAIMANT HAS CONDUCTED A CASE MEAN THAT IT SHOULD NOT HAVE SUMMARY JUDGMENT: "CLEAN HANDS" AND OTHER EQUITABLE MAXIMS CONSIDERED
EXPERT WATCH 59: THE JUDGE IS CONCERNED THAT THE EXPERTS' SOURCES OF ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WERE NOT FULLY DISCLOSED: THIS HAS CONSEQUENCES...

Archives

Blogroll

  • Fatal Accident Law
  • Legal Futures
  • Personal injury: Liability and Damages

Books

  • Munkman & Exall on Damages for Personal Injuries and Death 15th ed
  • The APIL Guide to Fatal Accidents 4th edition

Useful Links

  • Buntools (for preparing PDF Bundles)
  • Kings Chambers
  • Kings Chambers Costs & Litigation Funding
  • Kings Chambers Serious Injury
  • The Civil Procedure Rules
  • The Law Society Gazette
  • The National Archives Recently Published Judgments
  • The Senior Court Costs Office Guide 2025
  • www.Bailii.org

Copyright

© Gordon Exall, Exall Legal Training, Civil Litigation Brief, 2013-2026. Unauthorised use and or duplication of the material contained on this blog without permission is strictly prohibited.
Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.

To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
  • Membership Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Advertising Policy
  • Copyright
  • Legal Disclaimer

Copyright © 2026 Civil Litigation Brief ®

Powered by Big Yellow Workshop

Loading Comments...

You must be logged in to post a comment.