Civil Litigation Brief
Menu
  • Home
  • About
  • Membership Plans
  • Webinars
  • Login

Updates and Commentary on Civil Procedure, by Gordon Exall, Barrister, Kings Chambers

Browse: Page 71
HAMMERSMITH & FULHAM LAW CENTRE: 10,000 STEPS FOR JUSTICE: LONDON LEGAL SUPPORT TRUST

HAMMERSMITH & FULHAM LAW CENTRE: 10,000 STEPS FOR JUSTICE: LONDON LEGAL SUPPORT TRUST

May 27, 2020 · by gexall · in Charity, Members Content

Hammersmith & Fulham Law Centre are raising money for the London Legal Support Trust by doing 10,000 steps for justice on the 8th June. THE VIDEO To raise support the law centre has produced a video of their staff and…

EVALUATING EVIDENCE ON APPEAL: THE APPELLATE COURT WILL NOT READILY DISPLACE THE FINDINGS OF THE TRIAL JUDGE

EVALUATING EVIDENCE ON APPEAL: THE APPELLATE COURT WILL NOT READILY DISPLACE THE FINDINGS OF THE TRIAL JUDGE

May 27, 2020 · by gexall · in Appeals, Civil evidence, Members Content, Witness statements

I am grateful to  Christopher Kardahji from Irwin Mitchell solicitors  for sending me a copy of the judgment of Mr Justice Freedman in Lenord -v- First Manchester Limited [2020] EWHC 982 (QB).  The judgment contains a detailed analysis of the…

AUTOMATIC STAY OF POSSESSION HEARINGS APPLIES TO APPEALS: COURT OF APPEAL DECISION THIS MORNING

AUTOMATIC STAY OF POSSESSION HEARINGS APPLIES TO APPEALS: COURT OF APPEAL DECISION THIS MORNING

May 27, 2020 · by gexall · in Appeals, Civil Procedure, Coronavirus, Members Content

In London Borough of Hackney -v- Okoro [2020] EWCA Civ 681 the Court of Appeal found that the automatic stay on possession proceedings also applies to appeals against possession orders.     THE CASE The Court of Appeal were asked…

DAMAGES IN ANTICIPATION OF DEATH:  WEBINAR 8th JUNE 2020

DAMAGES IN ANTICIPATION OF DEATH: WEBINAR 8th JUNE 2020

May 27, 2020 · by gexall · in Damages, Fatal Accidents, Members Content

On the 8th June I am giving a webinar on the  important issues of  damages in anticipation of death.  This looks at damages for reduced life expectancy and the practical steps lawyers can take in these difficult and tragic cases. …

COVID REPEATS 34: EXPERTS, YACHTS AND THAT SINKING FEELING WHEN A CLAIMANT COMES TO GRIEF

COVID REPEATS 34: EXPERTS, YACHTS AND THAT SINKING FEELING WHEN A CLAIMANT COMES TO GRIEF

May 27, 2020 · by gexall · in Credibility of experts, Expert evidence, Experts, Members Content

Today we are looking back at the case of Hirtenstein -v- Hill Dickinson LLP [2014]  EWHC 2711 (Comm)  contains many interesting lessons for those involved in professional negligence litigation in particular.   Here I just want to concentrate upon two:…

AFFIDAVITS, COMPULSION,  EXHIBITS AND THE IMPLIED DUTY NOT TO DISCLOSE TO THIRD PARTIES: HIGH COURT DECISION

AFFIDAVITS, COMPULSION, EXHIBITS AND THE IMPLIED DUTY NOT TO DISCLOSE TO THIRD PARTIES: HIGH COURT DECISION

May 26, 2020 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Witness statements

I am grateful to barrister Sarah Walker for sending me a copy of the judgment of Deputy Insolvencies and Companies Court Judge Kyriakides in the Official Receiver -v- Skeene & Bowers [2020] EWHC 1252. It concerned the issue of whether…

LIES, DAMN LIES AND LITIGATION: WHY PEOPLE TELL LIES AND WHAT DOES THE JUDGE DO? (A RECAP)

LIES, DAMN LIES AND LITIGATION: WHY PEOPLE TELL LIES AND WHAT DOES THE JUDGE DO? (A RECAP)

May 26, 2020 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Members Content, Witness statements

For various reasons issues relating to the credibility of witnesses and “lies” are in the news this week. Litigation is not always about  lies or liars. Often it is about misunderstandings, mistaken recollection and people convincing themselves that they are correct….

COVID REPEATS 33: YOU'LL NEVER GET TYRED OF THIS: AN EXPERT REPORT THAT WAS “EXTRAORDINARY IN ITS PRESENTATION AND SHOT THROUGH WITH BREATH TAKING ARROGANCE”:

COVID REPEATS 33: YOU’LL NEVER GET TYRED OF THIS: AN EXPERT REPORT THAT WAS “EXTRAORDINARY IN ITS PRESENTATION AND SHOT THROUGH WITH BREATH TAKING ARROGANCE”:

May 26, 2020 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Credibility of experts, Expert evidence, Experts, Members Content

This is “experts” week for our stroll back through various posts on this blog.  In September 2017  barrister Brian McCluggage for sent me a copy of the decision of Her Honour Judge Belcher in Hatfield -v- Drax Power Ltd (18/08/2017) which…

ASSESSING WITNESS CREDIBILITY:  A REMINDER OF THE BASIC PRINCIPLES

ASSESSING WITNESS CREDIBILITY: A REMINDER OF THE BASIC PRINCIPLES

May 25, 2020 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Members Content, Witness statements

Today is  is a good day to look  again at the judgment of Mr Justice Leggatt in Gestmin SGPS S.A. -v- Credit Suisse [2013] EWCA 3560 (Comm).  This is case that is now mentioned regularly in cases involving witness recollection and…

SERVICE OF THE CLAIM FORM: WHAT CAN POSSIBLY GO WRONG? TEN SIMPLE POINTS TO MAKE LIFE EASIER & TO CAP OFF THE BANK HOLIDAY WEEKEND

SERVICE OF THE CLAIM FORM: WHAT CAN POSSIBLY GO WRONG? TEN SIMPLE POINTS TO MAKE LIFE EASIER & TO CAP OFF THE BANK HOLIDAY WEEKEND

May 25, 2020 · by gexall · in Applications, Avoiding negligence claims, Extensions of time, Members Content, Service of the claim form

 Service of the claim form remain a major cause of problems.  Here we re-cap (not for the first time) on the basic causes of  many of the problems, with links through to the many posts on this subject. This post…

ASSESSMENT OF COSTS: UNDER SPEND OF A PHASE  -  NOT A GOOD REASON TO DEPART FROM THE BUDGET

ASSESSMENT OF COSTS: UNDER SPEND OF A PHASE – NOT A GOOD REASON TO DEPART FROM THE BUDGET

May 25, 2020 · by gexall · in Assessment of Costs, Costs, Costs budgeting, Members Content

In  Utting v City College Norwich [2020] EWHC B20 (Costs) Master Brown rejected an argument that an “underspend” amounted to a good reason to depart from a budget. I am grateful to Paul Kay from R Costings for drawing this…

COVID REPEATS 32: EXPERTS: SEEING THE WOOD FOR THE TREES: THE EXPERT THAT DIDN'T BOUGH DOWN TO THE RULES...

COVID REPEATS 32: EXPERTS: SEEING THE WOOD FOR THE TREES: THE EXPERT THAT DIDN’T BOUGH DOWN TO THE RULES…

May 25, 2020 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Credibility of experts, Expert evidence, Experts, Members Content

This week, providing there are no major developments that draw us elsewhere, the repeats are going to be about cases relating to experts.  Firstly we go back to 2014 the judgment of Mr Justice Coulson in Stagecoach Great Western Trains -v- Hind…

THE AUCTION FOR THE SECRET BARRISTER'S BOOK: GOING, GOING AND GONE

THE AUCTION FOR THE SECRET BARRISTER’S BOOK: GOING, GOING AND GONE

May 24, 2020 · by gexall · in Charity, Members Content

The auction for a signed (and personally dedicated) copy of The Secret Barrister’s new book went well beyond expectations. A REMINDER OF THE AUCTION THE BOOK We were auctioning a signed copy of SB’s new book Details of the book…

COVID REPEATS 31: REPLIES AND DEFENCE TO COUNTERCLAIM: A PRIMER

COVID REPEATS 31: REPLIES AND DEFENCE TO COUNTERCLAIM: A PRIMER

May 24, 2020 · by gexall · in Civil Procedure, Members Content, Statements of Case

Surprisingly this post about the basics of replies and counterclaims  was the second most read post on this blog in 2017 (surprising because it was written in July 2016).  It simply sets out the basic rules relating to filing a…

COVID REPEATS 30: THE LYING WITNESS: THE APPROACH OF THE CIVIL COURTS

COVID REPEATS 30: THE LYING WITNESS: THE APPROACH OF THE CIVIL COURTS

May 23, 2020 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Members Content, Witness statements

We are going back to what was the most widely read post on this blog in 2017 and 2018. It is about witnesses telling lies.Mr Justice Smith has observed that “witnesses can regularly lie”.  How do lies impact upon the…

CIVIL UPDATE FOR NORTH AND WEST YORKSHIRE: UPDATED GUIDANCE FROM THE DESIGNATED CIVIL JUDGE

CIVIL UPDATE FOR NORTH AND WEST YORKSHIRE: UPDATED GUIDANCE FROM THE DESIGNATED CIVIL JUDGE

May 22, 2020 · by gexall · in Access to justice, Civil Procedure, Coronavirus, Members Content, Remote hearings

HHJ Gosnell has issued new guidance for civil courts in North and West Yorkshire. It is reproduced in full below.   “Introduction The purpose of this document is to update you on events since my last update on 6th April…

AMENDED LISTING PRIORITIES IN THE COUNTY COURT

AMENDED LISTING PRIORITIES IN THE COUNTY COURT

May 22, 2020 · by gexall · in Civil Procedure, Coronavirus, Members Content

The listing priorities in the county court were amended on 14.05.2020.   “Introduction 1. Listing is a judicial function. 2. All applications/hearings/trials should be considered in advance by a judge in order for the judge to decide whether it should…

THE USEFULNESS OF HAVING A TRANSCRIPT WHEN CONSIDERING ALLEGATIONS OF NON-DISCLOSURE

THE USEFULNESS OF HAVING A TRANSCRIPT WHEN CONSIDERING ALLEGATIONS OF NON-DISCLOSURE

May 22, 2020 · by gexall · in Applications, Injunctions, Members Content

In Les Ambassadeurs Club Ltd v Albluewi (aka Sheikh Salah Hamdan Albluewi And Mr Salah Hamdan Albelwi) [2020] EWHC 1313 (QB)Mr Justice Freedman set out the importance of having a transcript of an ex-parte hearing when considering allegations of a…

EXPERTS NOT FOLLOWING THE RULES: DEPLETES YOUR ENERGY: A HIGH COURT CASE

EXPERTS NOT FOLLOWING THE RULES: DEPLETES YOUR ENERGY: A HIGH COURT CASE

May 22, 2020 · by gexall · in Credibility of experts, Expert evidence, Experts, Members Content

The “Covid Repeats” section of this blog next week will review cases relating to experts.  Problems with experts remain a key issue in litigation.  Primarily caused by the expert’s failure to follow the basic rules and court orders. Examples can…

COVID REPEATS 29: "THERE IS NO PRIMER FOR SCUTTLERS": THE JUDGE'S ASSESSMENT OF EVIDENCE WHERE (HE FOUND) THAT A SHIP WAS SUNK DELIBERATELY

COVID REPEATS 29: “THERE IS NO PRIMER FOR SCUTTLERS”: THE JUDGE’S ASSESSMENT OF EVIDENCE WHERE (HE FOUND) THAT A SHIP WAS SUNK DELIBERATELY

May 22, 2020 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Members Content, Witness statements

We are looking again at the judgment of Mr Justice Teare in Kairos Shipping Ltd -v- The Standard Club Europe Ltd [2016] EWHC 2412 (Admlty) is a comprehensive lesson in thorough fact finding.   “There is no primer or guide to…

THE (NOT SO) LONELY LITIGATOR'S CLUB 25: CLAIRE GREEN: THE COST LAWYER'S TALE (OR TWO TAILS IN FACT)

THE (NOT SO) LONELY LITIGATOR’S CLUB 25: CLAIRE GREEN: THE COST LAWYER’S TALE (OR TWO TAILS IN FACT)

May 21, 2020 · by gexall · in Coronavirus, Costs, Members Content, Well being

Our club is going to need a costs lawyer or two. So for our first costs lawyer member I went straight to the top. Claire Green is currently Chairman of the Association of  Costs Lawyers ( ACL) as well as…

HMCTS GUIDANCE "Keeping court and tribunal buildings safe, secure and clean"

HMCTS GUIDANCE “Keeping court and tribunal buildings safe, secure and clean”

May 21, 2020 · by gexall · in Coronavirus, Members Content

HMCTS have recently updated their guidance about  security, cleaning and social-distancing arrangements in court and tribunal buildings during the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic.  Some of the guidance puts obligations on lawyers and court users.  Having successfully avoided the pun for two…

THE COVERT RECORDING OF AN EXPERT'S EXAMINATION - THE SEQUEL: DEFENDANT GIVEN PERMISSION TO OBTAIN NEW EXPERT

THE COVERT RECORDING OF AN EXPERT’S EXAMINATION – THE SEQUEL: DEFENDANT GIVEN PERMISSION TO OBTAIN NEW EXPERT

May 21, 2020 · by gexall · in Arbitration,, Civil evidence, Credibility of experts, Expert evidence, Experts, Members Content

In October last year I wrote about the case of Mustard v Flower & Ors [2019] EWHC 2623 (QB).  The claimant recorded her consultation with the defendant’s medical expert and was given permission to produce these in evidence.  That case has…

EXPERTS CAN'T BE ADVOCATES: IT IS AS SIMPLE AS THAT

EXPERTS CAN’T BE ADVOCATES: IT IS AS SIMPLE AS THAT

May 21, 2020 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil evidence, Credibility of experts, Expert evidence, Experts, Members Content

There are some interesting observations about the role of the expert made by Judge Asif Malek in Neil Picklessharon Pickles v Revenue & Customs (Whether crediting a directors’ loan account which was freely available for the directors/members to draw upon…

COVID REPEATS 28: GOING BACK TO COLLEGE: THE NEED TO PROVE DAMAGES

COVID REPEATS 28: GOING BACK TO COLLEGE: THE NEED TO PROVE DAMAGES

May 21, 2020 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Damages, Members Content

Today we are going back to the general theme of a failure to prove damages. One harsh shock for many litigants occurs when they are asked to prove their damages at trial. We have looked several times when a litigant…

ALDRED -V- CHAM: PERMISSION TO APPEAL REFUSED BY THE SUPREME COURT

ALDRED -V- CHAM: PERMISSION TO APPEAL REFUSED BY THE SUPREME COURT

May 20, 2020 · by gexall · in Appeals, Costs, Fixed Costs, Members Content

In November last year I reported on the case of  Aldred -v- Cham [2019] EWCA Civ 1780, in relation to the recoverability of counsel’s fees in child approval cases. I am grateful to Matthew Hoe from Taylor Rose who informs me…

THE (NOT SO) LONELY LITIGATOR'S CLUB 24: ROBERT MALES: THE MANAGING PARTNER'S TALE

THE (NOT SO) LONELY LITIGATOR’S CLUB 24: ROBERT MALES: THE MANAGING PARTNER’S TALE

May 20, 2020 · by gexall · in Coronavirus, Members Content, Well being

The latest member of our club is Robert Males. As you may be able to guess from the photo Robert is managing partner of Underwoods Solicitors of Hemel Hempstead Hertfordshire and Cape Town, South Africa.   Where are you working…

CLAIM STRUCK OUT FOR INADEQUATE PLEADING: ENOUGH TO MAKE YOU HIT THE BOTTLE

CLAIM STRUCK OUT FOR INADEQUATE PLEADING: ENOUGH TO MAKE YOU HIT THE BOTTLE

May 20, 2020 · by gexall · in Civil Procedure, Members Content, Statements of Case, Striking out

I don’t normally write about the cases relating to defamation and pleading, this is a very niche area and there is usually little of general interest. However the judgment of Mr Justice Nicol in  BrewDog Plc & Anor v Frank…

GENERAL GUIDANCE ON PDF BUNDLES FOR HEARINGS IN COURTS: GUIDANCE ISSUED TODAY

GENERAL GUIDANCE ON PDF BUNDLES FOR HEARINGS IN COURTS: GUIDANCE ISSUED TODAY

May 20, 2020 · by gexall · in Bundles, Case Management, Coronavirus, Members Content

Mr Justice Mann has issued the following guidance on PDF bundles today. It provides practical guidance as to the matters that should be included in bundles, including the need for optical recognition, the need for the documents to be in…

COVID REPEATS 27: AVOIDING A SERIOUS TRAP: WHEN (AND WHEN NOT TO) SERVE THE CLAIM FORM ON A SOLICITOR: (YOU REALLY HAVE TO KNOW THIS)

COVID REPEATS 27: AVOIDING A SERIOUS TRAP: WHEN (AND WHEN NOT TO) SERVE THE CLAIM FORM ON A SOLICITOR: (YOU REALLY HAVE TO KNOW THIS)

May 20, 2020 · by gexall · in Applications, Avoiding negligence claims, Members Content, Service of the claim form

The post yesterday on service of the claim form has caused a slight change of plan for this series.  Today we are going to look again at the rules relating to service of the claim form on a solicitor.  We have…

RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS GRANTED FOLLOWING LATE SERVICE OF WITNESS STATEMENTS: SUCCESSFUL APPEAL TO THE HIGH COURT

RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS GRANTED FOLLOWING LATE SERVICE OF WITNESS STATEMENTS: SUCCESSFUL APPEAL TO THE HIGH COURT

May 19, 2020 · by gexall · in Appeals, Applications, Extensions of time, Members Content, Relief from sanctions

High Court decisions in relation to relief of sanctions seem to be coming in pairs.  Yesterday we looked at Depp II v News Group Newspapers Ltd & Anor [2020] EWHC 1237 (QB) today we are looking at the claimant’s successful appeal…

SERVICE OF THE CLAIM FORM: CLAIMANT SURVIVES "BY THE SKIN OF THEIR TEETH": SOME IMPORTANT LESSONS TO LEARN HERE

SERVICE OF THE CLAIM FORM: CLAIMANT SURVIVES “BY THE SKIN OF THEIR TEETH”: SOME IMPORTANT LESSONS TO LEARN HERE

May 19, 2020 · by gexall · in Applications, Extensions of time, Members Content, Service of the claim form, Serving documents

Every year brings its own crop of service of the claim form cases. This year is no different.  In Oran Environmental Solutions Ltd & Anor v QBE Insurance (Europe) Ltd & Anor [2020] EWHC 1271 (Comm) Mrs Justice Cockerill observed…

PROVING THINGS 176: RELYING ON MEMORY FROM EVENTS A LONG TIME BACK

PROVING THINGS 176: RELYING ON MEMORY FROM EVENTS A LONG TIME BACK

May 19, 2020 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Members Content, Witness statements

I am grateful to David Platt QC  for sending me a copy of the judgment given today of Geoffrey Tattersall QC (sitting as a Deputy High Court Judge) in  Bannister -v- Freemans Public Limited Company [2020] EWHC 1256 (QB).  …

COVID REPEATS 26: YOU HAVE TO PROVE YOU HAVE SUFFERED DAMAGES: FOOTBALL CLUB PITCHES THEIR CASE TOO HIGHLY

COVID REPEATS 26: YOU HAVE TO PROVE YOU HAVE SUFFERED DAMAGES: FOOTBALL CLUB PITCHES THEIR CASE TOO HIGHLY

May 19, 2020 · by gexall · in Appeals, Civil evidence, Damages, Members Content

The next few posts in this series are going to highlight those cases where parties simply failed to prove things at trial (and there are quite a few of these). Today we are looking at  the Court of Appeal decision…

JOHNNY DEPP: LATE WITNESS STATEMENTS & THE COURTS: JUDGE CURTAILS THE EVIDENCE THAT CAN BE CALLED

JOHNNY DEPP: LATE WITNESS STATEMENTS & THE COURTS: JUDGE CURTAILS THE EVIDENCE THAT CAN BE CALLED

May 18, 2020 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil evidence, Members Content, Relief from sanctions, Witness statements

The judgment of Mr Justice Nicol in Depp II v News Group Newspapers Ltd & Anor [2020] EWHC 1237 (QB) is interesting because the judge grants relief from sanctions because of a delay in service of witness statements. More significantly,…

INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATIONS TO THE COURT: EXTENSIONS OF TIME & INTERIM PAYMENTS: WEBINAR 4th JUNE 2020

INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATIONS TO THE COURT: EXTENSIONS OF TIME & INTERIM PAYMENTS: WEBINAR 4th JUNE 2020

May 18, 2020 · by gexall · in Applications, Interim Payments, Members Content

At a time when most applications are going to be heard remotely, it is more important than ever that litigators know and comply with the rules governing making applications to court. I am giving a webinar on the 4th June…

COVID REPEATS 25: COSTS WHEN A CLAIMANT RECEIVES NOMINAL DAMAGES: YOU'VE TURNED DOWN £1.5 MILLION, RECEIVED £2  & NOW HAVE TO FACE THE CONSEQUENCES

COVID REPEATS 25: COSTS WHEN A CLAIMANT RECEIVES NOMINAL DAMAGES: YOU’VE TURNED DOWN £1.5 MILLION, RECEIVED £2 & NOW HAVE TO FACE THE CONSEQUENCES

May 18, 2020 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Costs, Members Content, Part 36

Failing to beat a Part 36 offer is always painful. Failing to beat an offer of £1.5 million and receiving £2 is, most probably, even more painful.   Here we look at the second part of the case discussed yesterday.  In Marathon…

COVID REPEATS 24: THE CLAIMANT THAT CLAIMED £15 MILLION, TURNED DOWN £1.5 MILLION AND RECEIVED £2.00 (YES TWO WHOLE POUNDS)

COVID REPEATS 24: THE CLAIMANT THAT CLAIMED £15 MILLION, TURNED DOWN £1.5 MILLION AND RECEIVED £2.00 (YES TWO WHOLE POUNDS)

May 17, 2020 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Damages, Members Content

The “Proving Things” series has been a part of this blog for several years now.  Many of the posts highlight those cases (and there does not seem to be any end to them) where a party simply has no evidence…

THE (NOT SO) LONELY LITIGATOR'S CLUB 23: SASHA BEAUMONT-HODGES: THE LAW STUDENT'S TALE

THE (NOT SO) LONELY LITIGATOR’S CLUB 23: SASHA BEAUMONT-HODGES: THE LAW STUDENT’S TALE

May 17, 2020 · by gexall · in Coronavirus, Members Content, Well being

It is important for the future of the club that we encourage young members and are aware of the difficulties that they are going through at the moment. For that reason I invited law student Sasha Beaumont-Hughes to become a…

THE (NOT SO) LONELY LITIGATOR'S CLUB 22: PAUL MAGRATH: THE LAW REPORTER'S TALE

THE (NOT SO) LONELY LITIGATOR’S CLUB 22: PAUL MAGRATH: THE LAW REPORTER’S TALE

May 15, 2020 · by gexall · in Coronavirus, Members Content, Well being

It occurred to me that a law reporter would would be a very helpful, in not essential,  addition to our club ( I have checked and the club rules allow this). So I asked Paul Magrath to join. Paul  is…

COVID REPEATS 23: A CHEERFUL POST FOR THE WEEKEND: THE GOOD STUFF ABOUT BEING A LITIGATOR - FROM NICE LAWYERS

COVID REPEATS 23: A CHEERFUL POST FOR THE WEEKEND: THE GOOD STUFF ABOUT BEING A LITIGATOR – FROM NICE LAWYERS

May 15, 2020 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Well being

I thought it would be a good idea to end the week on a positive note.  Here we are looking at contributions from lawyers on Twitter about the positive side of being a lawyer. THE QUEST I set the challenge…

THE IMPORTANCE OF STATEMENTS OF CASE: THE TRIAL SHOULD NOT BECOME A "FREE FOR ALL": COURT OF APPEAL SENDS OUT A WARNING

THE IMPORTANCE OF STATEMENTS OF CASE: THE TRIAL SHOULD NOT BECOME A “FREE FOR ALL”: COURT OF APPEAL SENDS OUT A WARNING

May 15, 2020 · by gexall · in Civil Procedure, Members Content, Statements of Case

In Dhillon v Barclays Bank Plc & Anor [2020] EWCA Civ 619 the Court of Appeal reiterated the importance of statements of case in relation to civil litigation.  The statements of case should define the issues at trial.   “It…

COVID REPEATS 22: DRESSING FOR COURT: NO RIPPED JEANS, BUT NO TOP HAT,  TAILS AND SPATS EITHER

COVID REPEATS 22: DRESSING FOR COURT: NO RIPPED JEANS, BUT NO TOP HAT, TAILS AND SPATS EITHER

May 15, 2020 · by gexall · in Advocacy, Conduct, Coronavirus, Members Content

I thought hard about whether repeating a post about dressing for court is appropriate for the current times. We will have to go back to court one day, and current guidance dictates that (the top half of us at least)…

WHEN A DEFENDANT FILED A COSTS BUDGET LATE: RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS REFUSED: "THE DEFAULTING PARTY HAS ONLY ITSELF OR ITS LEGAL REPRESENTATIVE TO BLAME"

WHEN A DEFENDANT FILED A COSTS BUDGET LATE: RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS REFUSED: “THE DEFAULTING PARTY HAS ONLY ITSELF OR ITS LEGAL REPRESENTATIVE TO BLAME”

May 14, 2020 · by gexall · in Applications, Avoiding negligence claims, Members Content, Relief from sanctions, Statements of Truth, Witness statements

The judgment of HHJ Simon Barker QC in Heathfield International LLC v Axiom Stone (London) Ltd [2020] EWHC 1075 (Ch) is another example of a party coming to grief because of the failure to file a costs budget timeously.  That…

PRE-ACTION DISCLOSURE: CONDUCT, DISCRETION AND THE "FISHING EXPEDITION" ANALOGY MAY NOT BE A GOOD ONE

PRE-ACTION DISCLOSURE: CONDUCT, DISCRETION AND THE “FISHING EXPEDITION” ANALOGY MAY NOT BE A GOOD ONE

May 14, 2020 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil Procedure, Disclosure, Members Content

It is relatively rare for  there to be a High Court judgment on the issue of pre-action disclosure.   In Taylor Wimpey UK Ltd v Harron Homes Ltd [2020] EWHC 1190 (TCC) Mr Justice Fraser had some interesting observations on the…

COVID REPEATS 21: OPENING LINES OF JUDGMENTS (WITH SOME NEW ONES THROWN IN): BJORN AGAIN

COVID REPEATS 21: OPENING LINES OF JUDGMENTS (WITH SOME NEW ONES THROWN IN): BJORN AGAIN

May 14, 2020 · by gexall · in Civil Procedure, Coronavirus, Members Content

Today we are looking at opening lines of judgment.  We also have a new opening line from earlier this year.   ABBA: (ALTHOUGH THE WINNER DIDN’T TAKE IT ALL…) In April this year in a judgment about an inheritance dispute…

UNSUCCESSFUL DEFENDANTS ORDERED TO PAY SUCCESSFUL DEFENDANT'S COSTS: THE RELEVANT FACTORS CONSIDERED

UNSUCCESSFUL DEFENDANTS ORDERED TO PAY SUCCESSFUL DEFENDANT’S COSTS: THE RELEVANT FACTORS CONSIDERED

May 13, 2020 · by gexall · in Conduct, Costs, Members Content

One of the most difficult decisions in litigation, particularly personal injury litigation,  can be deciding which defendant to sue.  This can be a problem with occupier’s liability or construction site cases where potential defendants are blaming each other.  A defendant…

COVID REPEATS 20: CIVIL LITIGATION BRIEF 26 YEARS AGO: PROCEDURAL DEVELOPMENT IN 1994

COVID REPEATS 20: CIVIL LITIGATION BRIEF 26 YEARS AGO: PROCEDURAL DEVELOPMENT IN 1994

May 13, 2020 · by gexall · in Applications, Bundles, Coronavirus, Members Content, Relief from sanctions

Six years ago I reviewed the annual output of Civil Litigation Brief in 1994 so, in essence, this is a repeat of a repeat. There were no “blogs” back. Twenty six ago CLB  was a monthly column in the Solicitors…

CHALLENGES TO THE VALIDITY OF PRACTICE DIRECTION MADE AS A RESPONSE TO CORONAVIRUS:  THIS IS A PILOT SCHEME

CHALLENGES TO THE VALIDITY OF PRACTICE DIRECTION MADE AS A RESPONSE TO CORONAVIRUS: THIS IS A PILOT SCHEME

May 12, 2020 · by gexall · in Appeals, Civil evidence, Coronavirus, Members Content

In Arkin -v- Marshall [2020] EWCA Civ 620 the Court of Appeal rejected an argument that  Practice Direction 51Z  was ultra vires. The Practice Direction which provides for a stay of possession proceedings during the coronavirus crisis was held to…

THE (NOT SO) LONELY LITIGATOR'S CLUB 21: DONNA SCULLY: FROM DUBLIN TO LIVERPOOL

THE (NOT SO) LONELY LITIGATOR’S CLUB 21: DONNA SCULLY: FROM DUBLIN TO LIVERPOOL

May 12, 2020 · by gexall · in Coronavirus, Members Content, Well being

Our newest member practices in Liverpool. Donna Scully. Originally from Dublin Donna qualified as a solicitor at the age of 30 and is now director of the Carpenters Group.   I am Irish, from Dublin.  I am a joint owner/Director…

← Previous 1 … 70 71 72 … 142 Next →

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email. Subscription notifies you of a new post, it does not give you access to members' content.

Join 12.4K other subscribers

Recent Posts

  • EXPERT WATCH 45: THE JUDGE PREFERS TO THE EVIDENCE WHO HAD EXPERIENCE AND “GENUINE EXPERIENCE IN THE SUBJECT AREA”
  • WITNESS EVIDENCE WEDNESDAY: KEEPING COMMERCIAL LITIGATORS OFF THE NAUGHTY STEP: WEBINAR PLUS USEFUL CHECKLISTS AND PRECEDENTS: 30th APRIL 2026
  • THE COSTS LIABILITY OF A REPRESENTATIVE OF A DECEASED PERSON UNDER CPR 19.12 CONSIDERED: THE SITUATION IS NOT THE SAME AS AN ADMINISTRATOR OR EXECUTOR
  • COST BITES 380: “ALWAYS CHOOSE A COSTS LAWYER FOR EXPERT LEGAL COSTS ADVICE”: GUIDANCE FROM THE SRA
  • COMMERCIAL LITIGATORS ON THE NAUGHTY STEP 5: PD57AC AND REFERENCE TO DOCUMENTS: WHY LAWYERS NEED TO BE PRISED AWAY FROM THEIR COMFORT BLANKETS

Top Posts

  • COST BITES 380: "ALWAYS CHOOSE A COSTS LAWYER FOR EXPERT LEGAL COSTS ADVICE": GUIDANCE FROM THE SRA
  • EXPERT WATCH 45: THE JUDGE PREFERS TO THE EVIDENCE WHO HAD EXPERIENCE AND "GENUINE EXPERIENCE IN THE SUBJECT AREA"
  • THE COSTS LIABILITY OF A REPRESENTATIVE OF A DECEASED PERSON UNDER CPR 19.12 CONSIDERED: THE SITUATION IS NOT THE SAME AS AN ADMINISTRATOR OR EXECUTOR
  • WITNESS EVIDENCE WEDNESDAY: KEEPING COMMERCIAL LITIGATORS OFF THE NAUGHTY STEP: WEBINAR PLUS USEFUL CHECKLISTS AND PRECEDENTS: 30th APRIL 2026
  • ACTION STRUCK OUT UNDER CPR 3.4(2)(c) FOR NON COMPLIANCE: DENTON PRINCIPLES APPLIED

Archives

Blogroll

  • Fatal Accident Law
  • Legal Futures
  • Personal injury: Liability and Damages

Books

  • Munkman & Exall on Damages for Personal Injuries and Death 15th ed
  • The APIL Guide to Fatal Accidents 4th edition

Useful Links

  • Buntools (for preparing PDF Bundles)
  • Kings Chambers
  • Kings Chambers Costs & Litigation Funding
  • Kings Chambers Serious Injury
  • The Civil Procedure Rules
  • The Law Society Gazette
  • The National Archives Recently Published Judgments
  • The Senior Court Costs Office Guide 2025
  • www.Bailii.org

Copyright

© Gordon Exall, Exall Legal Training, Civil Litigation Brief, 2013-2026. Unauthorised use and or duplication of the material contained on this blog without permission is strictly prohibited.
Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.

To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
  • Membership Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Advertising Policy
  • Copyright
  • Legal Disclaimer

Copyright © 2026 Civil Litigation Brief

Powered by Big Yellow Workshop

 

Loading Comments...
 

You must be logged in to post a comment.