IF YOU ARE GOING TO CRITICISE AN EXPERT THIS MUCH YOU SHOULD HAVE RAISED IT AT THE CASE MANAGEMENT HEARING: HIGH COURT REJECTS EACH PARTY’S ATTACKS ON OPPONENT’S EXPERTS
We have seen plenty of cases where the courts have not been slow in their criticism of expert witnesses. Here we have a different situation where the judge was critical of the attacks, by each party, on the credibility of…
PROVING THINGS 267: COURT OF APPEAL OVERTURNS FINDING THAT COUNCIL HAD ESTABLISHED ITS STATUTORY DEFENCE: SOME VERY IMPORTANT POINTS HERE ABOUT THE USE OF STATEMENTS PUT TO WITNESSES AND JUDICIAL FACT FINDING
Here we are looking at an important decision of the Court of Appeal. On the face of it it is about a defendant’s failure to prove a statutory defence. However, perhaps more significantly, it is about evidence, the impact of…
CONTRIBUTORY NEGLIGENCE CONSIDERED: CASES IN THE COURTS IN THE PAST 12 MONTHS: WEBINAR 1ST JULY 2025
It is commonplace for defendants to make allegations of contributory negligence against an injured claimant. Litigators working in this field need to know the basic law and principles relating to contributory negligence and also how these are being applied in…
HEARINGS WHEN WITNESSES GIVE EVIDENCE FROM ABROAD: SOME POINTS FOR PRACTITIONERS (AND JUDGES) TO WATCH: “IT WOULD ASSIST THE LOWER COURTS IF FORMAL CLARIFICATION IS GIVEN ADDRESSING THAT TENSION HEAD ON”
There have been a number of cases where litigants have run into difficulties because they have not complied with the requirements for witnesses who give evidence remotely from abroad. We see an example of this case where there a conflict…
PROVING THINGS 266: THE BURDEN OF PROOF, HEARSAY EVIDENCE AND WHEN EVIDENCE IS NOT “EXPERT EVIDENCE”: ALSO THE IMPORTANCE OF SERVING A NOTICE OF NON-AUTHENTICITY
We are looking, again, at a case where there were issues as to evidence. Part of the defendant’s case was that the evidence was not admissible or was hearsay. The defendant’s arguments did not prosper. Hearsay is admissible, the real…
PROVING THINGS 265: SPEND SIX WEEKS IN COURT, WIN ON LIABILITY AND RECEIVE NOTHING IN DAMAGES: TOY STORY – THE SCARY VERSION
Here we have a case where the claimant spent some six weeks in court, established that the defendant was in breach, but recovered nothing in damages. It may well be an object lesson in failing to prove loss. (A photo taken…
ANOTHER CASE ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND “HALLUCINATED CASES”: PLUS THERE MAY BE “MISCHIEF” IN THE BACKGROUND
A few weeks ago I was cagey in reporting a case about AI generated false authorities because I could not believe any lawyer could do this and was wary of the accuracy (indeed authenticity) of the report. Today I am…
SHOULD SKELETON ARGUMENTS BE MADE AVAILABLE TO THE PRESS (AND OTHERS) ?: ADVOCATES MUST BE PREPARED
Is a person attending a public hearing entitled to sight of the skeleton arguments being used? Is disclosure confined to the press? What should happen if the skeleton refers to matters that fall foul of reporting restrictions? These are important…
THE CURRENT IMPORTANCE OF PLEADINGS 17: WHAT DOES THE WORD “PORNOGRAPHY” MEAN WHEN INCLUDED IN A PLEADING? COURT OF APPEAL CONSIDERS THE ISSUE TODAY
This series has taken an unexpected turn. I didn’t expert to be writing about a Court of Appeal decision that considered the precise pleaded meaning of the word “pornography”, but that is precisely what we are doing here. A decision…
WHICH EXPERT WITNESS IS GOING TO BE PREFERRED? ONE EXPERT TOOK AN “UNREALISTIC APPROACH”
Knowing the reasons why a judge may prefer the evidence of one expert over another is an important part of a litigator’s skill. Each case is, of course, fact specific, but there are clear trends that can be discerned. Here…
WHAT ARE THE CONSEQUENCES WHEN A WITNESS BREAKS THE “PURDAH” RULES? THE ISSUES CONSIDERED IN THE HIGH COURT
The “purdah” rule – that a witness cannot discuss the case and their evidence with others, including their legal team, once they have started giving evidence is of utmost significance. Here we are looking at a case where a witness…
THE RULES OF COURT DO NOT ALLOW A PARTY TO COMPEL ITS OPPONENT TO EXPLAIN HOW ERRORS WERE MADE IN WITNESS STATEMENTS:
Can the court compel a party to file a witness statement explaining, in detail, why mistakes were made in earlier witness statements? That was the issue considered in the case we are looking at today. The judge considered the provisions…
AN IMPORTANT POINT ABOUT TRIAL BUNDLES: REDACTION SHOULD NOT NORMALLY TAKE PLACE: IT MAKES THE COURT’S JOB MORE DIFFICULT
There is always room for another case about bundles on this site. It is a subject of endless fascination to most litigators, and endless frustration for many judges. Here we are looking at a case where the trial judge observed…
PROVING THINGS 264: CLAIMANTS FAIL TO PROVE THAT THEY ARE ENTITLED TO AN INJUNCTION: “THE EVIDENCE PRESENTED BY THE CLAIMANTS DOES NOT COME CLOSE TO DEMONSTRATING A COMPELLING JUSTIFICATION FOR THE ORDER”
We are looking at a case where there was clear example of a failure to prove things. The claimants did not have sufficient evidence to satisfy the court it should make the order they were seeking. In fact the judgment…
LAWYERS HEAVILY CRITICISED IN A JUDGMENT: COURT OF APPEAL REFUSES PERMISSION TO APPEAL: A CASE THAT BRISTLES WITH CONDUCT AND PROCEDURAL ISSUES
We have a case here where a solicitor and KC involved in a case were heavily criticised by the trial judge. The solicitor attempted to appeal those findings and the Court of Appeal considered, among many other things, their Article…
PROVING THINGS 263: “IT IS A FUNDAMENTAL PRINCIPLE OF LITIGATION THAT A CLAIMANT MUST PROVE THEIR LOSS… THEY MUST ALSO SATISFY THE COURT AS TO THE AMOUNT OF ANY LOSS WHICH THEY HAVE SUFFERED”
This series has now covered hundreds of examples where litigants have failed to prove their case. We are looking at another example here where a counterclaiming defendant adduced no substantive evidence of a claim said to be worth nearly £500,000. …
SOME QUICK NOTES ABOUT CORPORATE SUBSCRIPTIONS: NEW GROUP NUMBERS ADDED – YOU CAN NOW SUBSCRIBE FOR UP TO 1,000 SEATS (AND MORE BY ARRANGEMENT)
A number of people have been in touch asking whether the site can accommodate larger groups than those set out in the original plan (someone has asked whether there can be “limitless” numbers on a subscription). As a result of…
“ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE” ON TRIAL: WHEN QUESTIONED CHAT GPT WILL TELL YOU ITS MADE THINGS UP: THIS IS “A HALLUCINATION RATHER THAN A REAL LEGAL AUTHORITY”
Artificial Intelligence and legal “research” has been very much in the news of late. I am grateful to my colleague Steven Turner for sending me an example where, upon being questioned, Chat GPT readily conceded that a case it had…
SHOULD A PARTY BE ABLE TO INSTRUCT THEIR OWN EXPERT WHEN THEY DISAGREE WITH THE REPORT OF A JOINTLY INSTRUCTED EXPERT? THE ISSUES CONSIDERED
Here we are looking at a case where a party, dissatisfied with the approach of a jointly instructed expert, applied to the court for permission to instruct their own expert. The judgment contains a useful summary of the relevant principles….
BECOME A MEMBER TO KEEP UP TO DATE: THIS SITE IS BECOMING A MEMBERSHIP SUBSCRIBER SITE – MAKING CLB BIGGER AND BETTER
On the 10th June 2025* this site is becoming a membership site. All the past posts, and the vast majority of future posts will only be available to members who have joined. This post explains what readers need to do…
CITING FALSE CASES TO THE COURT 4: THE COURT’S REVIEW OF CASES WHERE AI HAD CAUSED TROUBLE – AT HOME AND ABROAD
The use of AI which cites “false” cases is extremely worrying. It is clear that this is a widespread issue. In an appendix to the judgment the Divisional Court reviewed the cases, including many from foreign jurisdictions, where AI had…
UNDERSTANDING THE LAW AS TO FATAL ACCIDENTS 2025: WEBINAR 11th JUNE 2025
Part of a series on fatal accident litigation this webinar takes you through the essential elements you have to consider before you can advise whether a claim for fatal accident damages can be brought. Booking details available here WHAT THE…
CITING FALSE CASES TO THE COURT 2: A LAWYER IS NOT ENTITLED TO RELY ON THEIR LAY CLIENT FOR THE ACCURACY OF CITATIONS OF AUTHORITY
We are continuing with the examination of the Court’s judgment in relation to cases where false authorities have been cited as a result of a reliance on false authorities, generated by artificial intelligence. Here we have a case where the…
“THIS PRELIMINARY ISSUE TRIAL IS NOT A REHEARSAL”: THE DIFFICULTIES A CLAIMANT HAS IN A CLAIM UNDER THE THIRD PARTY (RIGHTS AGAINST INSURERS) ACT 2010
Here we look at a case where the claimant suggested that a preliminary issue trial be adjourned. The court was firm in its rejection of that suggestion. The judge stated that the trial “is not a rehearsal” and that if…
PROVING THINGS 262: CLAIMANTS DID NOT HAVE THE EVIDENCE AT TRIAL TO PROVE THE DAMAGES SOUGHT: AN EXHAUSTING JOB
This series may well be misnamed. A more apt description may well be “not proving things”. That is what we are considering in looking at the case today. There was a lengthy trial with a substantial claim for damages. The…
PARTS OF WITNESS STATEMENT STRUCK OUT – THIS “CARRIES NO WEIGHT AS EVIDENCE”:DOORS FIRMLY SHUT IN RELATION TO INADMISSIBLE COMMENTARY
If we had a pound for every word in witness statements served in just one single month that was irrelevant or inadmissible we could probably go a long way to paying off the national debt. The costs, however, are probably…
PART 35 QUESTIONS TO EXPERTS A POINT ABOUT THE CASE LAW: HOW FAR CAN THE QUESTIONS GO? A CLOSE LOOK AT THE COURT OF APPEAL DECISION IN MUTCH
The previous post about when experts should be called to give evidence also contained a consideration of the nature of questions that can be put to experts. One of my colleagues has suggested that the summary relating to the questioning…
WHEN SHOULD PARTIES BE ALLOWED TO CALL EXPERT WITNESSES TO GIVE EVIDENCE AT TRIAL? THE ISSUES CONSIDERED (IN THE FAMILY COURT)
When should the courts permit experts to give evidence at trial? There are few cases on this topic and today we are looking at a decision in the family courts. The case is relevant to civil practitioners in that it…
WITNESS STATEMENTS, FORGED DOCUMENTS AND A FINDING OF CONTEMPT OF COURT: A WHOLE BUNCH OF PROBLEMS
This is a case where the judge found that the claimant and a witness relied on documents that they knew to be forged. It is an important reminder of the lengths that some people can go to in litigation. It…
DOES EVERY DOG DESERVE ONE BITE? LIABILITY FOR ANIMALS – RECENT CASES CONSIDERED: WEBINAR 6th JUNE 2025
It is difficult to find anyone who has a good word to say about Section 2 of the Animals Act, this webinar looks at recent cases relating to liability for animals and the practical steps litigators can take when considering…
PERSONAL INJURY POINTS 6: HOW IS THE COURT GOING TO APPROACH THE COSTS OF ACCOMMODATION WHEN THE CLAIMANT HAS A REDUCED LIFE EXPECTANCY – & HOW DOES THE COURT DEAL WITH THIS ON AN APPLICATION FOR AN INTERIM PAYMENT?
The decision in Swift -v- Carpenter set out the approach the courts should normally take when a claimant needs to purchase accommodation because of their injuries. However that judgment, expressly, left open issues relating to the approach the courts should take…
THE CURRENT IMPORTANCE OF PLEADINGS 12: A DEFENDANT IS NOT EXPECTED TO DIVINE THE NATURE OF THE CLAIMANT’S CASE
Today we are looking at a pleadings issue that arose in the course a lengthy contractual dispute. The claimant made certain, specific allegations, and pleaded that these matters breached a large number of contractual obligations. However, at trial, the claimant…
PERSONAL INJURY POINTS 5: THE PUBLICAN WAS NOT VICARIOUSLY LIABLE FOR THE ACTS OF A SEPARATE SECURITY COMPANY
When a claimant is injured by doormen working on licensed premises is the publican vicariously liable if the assailants were employed by a separate security company ? The answer is “it depends”. The issue is primarily one of control. It…
EXPERTS IN COURT: “TRESPASSING ON THE JUDICIAL FUNCTION” AND “SEEKING TO ADVOCATE” ON BEHALF OF PARTY: THIS RARELY ENDS WELL…
There is no shortage of posts on this blogs where judges are critical of expert witnesses. Today we look at another such case where the judge found the expert’s approach “concerning” and went on to state that the expert was…
SERVICE OF INJUNCTIONS: THE COURT ALLOWS SERVICE BY EMAIL RATHER THAN PERSONAL SERVICE
Injunctions normally have to be served in person. Here we are looking at a short point as to when it is permissible to serve an injunction by email. THE CASE Chanel Ltd v Skeens [2025] EWHC 619 (KB)…
THE WITNESS STATEMENT “IS IN LARGE PART UNRELIABLE AND ALSO LACKS CREDIBILITY”: THE ENDURING PROBLEM OF “RETROSPECTIVE RECONSTRUCTION”
We have looked many times at the problems caused by witness statements, including when a witness “tries” to remember matters they really cannot, or reconstructs what they feel did happen (or should have happened). This is a feature of all…
PROVING THINGS 261: PROVING FUTURE INTENTIONS: AN INTENTION TO HAVE MEDICAL OPERATIONS CARRIED OUT PRIVATELY
Today we are looking at a case where the defendant appealed against a decision that the claimant could recover the future cost of medical treatment to be carried out on a private basis. Statute states that there is no duty…
THE IMPORTANCE OF CONTEMPORANEOUS ATTENDANCE NOTES EXAMINED IN THE COURT OF APPEAL (BUT A DIFFERENT DIVISION TO THE ONE WE USUALLY LOOK AT)
Today we are taking a rare trip into the criminal courts, the Court of Appeal Criminal Division. However we are looking at an issue that affects most, if not all, lawyers. A client can attempt to blame their lawyer for…
AVOIDING UNDERSETTLEMENT: PROTECTING THE CLIENT AND PROTECTING YOURSELF: WEBINAR 29th MAY 2025
“We go back through your claim in fine detail and if we find that your previous solicitor wasn’t thorough enough and your claim was mishandled, we’ll squeeze out all the compensation that you’re entitled to, getting you more money, and…
COST BITES 238: WHEN A CLIENT DISPUTES THE SOLICITOR’S COSTS: THE JUDGE’S VIEW ON MEMORY, WITNESSES AND STATEMENTS DRAFTED “WITH THE GUIDING HAND OF THE CLAIMANTS’ SOLICITOR”
Today we are looking at part of a judgment about costs. Ten claimants had been selected (out of 223) to give evidence challenging a solicitor’s deduction of success fees. In fact only four of the claimants attended court to give…
THE CURRENT IMPORTANCE OF PLEADINGS 10: THE DUTIES ON A PARTY PLEADING ALLEGATIONS OF FRAUD OR DECEIT
Allegations of fraud have to be pleaded with care. Those pleading such assertions must have “reasonably credible material” to support them. Here we look at a case where allegations of deceit were made. The judge found that the allegations had…
PARTS OF A SOLICITORS’ WITNESS STATEMENT ARE STRUCK OUT: A REMINDER – A WITNESS STATEMENT IS A PLACE FOR FACTS, NOT OPINION, LEGAL ARGUMENTS OR ATTEMPTS TO GIVE EXPERT EVIDENCE: IT IS REALLY THAT SIMPLE
There are countless posts on this blog where judges have criticised the contents of witness statements. Here we are looking at a case where the judge struck out parts of a witness statement signed by a solicitor. Parts of the…
ANOTHER (YES ANOTHER) CASE OF FAKE AUTHORITIES BEING CITED TO THE COURT: APPEAL STRUCK OUT AS AN ABUSE OF PROCESS
Unbelievably we are looking at another case where the court found that false authorities had been cited to it. The appeal was struck out as an abuse of process. “In my judgment, the Court needs to take decisive action…
PERSONAL INJURY POINTS 1: WHAT DISCOUNT SHOULD BE GIVEN WHEN CARE IS PROVIDED GRATUIOUSLY ? THE COURT REVIEWS THE “STANDARD APPROACH”
For a while now I have planned a series that gives a focal point to the many cases and examples that arise, and are sent to me, in relation to personal injury matters. Many people offer help but the procedural…
WHAT TO DO IF THE DEFENDANT MAKES AN EARLY PART 36 OFFER: WEBINAR 21st MAY 2025
A defendant is entitled to make a Part 36 offer whenever it wants. The making of an early offer can cause major problems for claimants and their lawyers. An understanding of the rules, the relevant cases and the steps that…
CIVIL PROCEDURE BACK TO BASICS 102: HOW NOT TO WRITE A LEGAL LETTER (2): SOME EXAMPLES – THREATENING TO SUBJECT YOUR OPPONENT TO THE “LEGAL EQUIVALENT OF A PROCTOLOGY EXAM”
We are continuing with this back to basics series with some more examples of how not to write legal correspondence. We are looking at an (extreme) example, some guidance from the SRA and then the principles considered in more recent cases….
CIVIL PROCEDURE BACK TO BASICS 101: HOW NOT TO WRITE A LEGAL LETTER : DIMISSING CRUCIAL POINTS AS “COSMETIC” ERRORS LEADS TO REFERRAL TO THE SRA
There has not been a post in this series for some time. There was one case last week that made me decide to restart the series. It is not difficult to guess which case caused me concern. …
THE COURT DOES NOT REQUIRE EXPERT EVIDENCE TO CONSTRUE A TERM IN AN AGREEMENT: AN EXPERT CANNOT BE USED TO USURP THE FUNCTION OF THE COURT
Is an expert needed to construe a contractual agreement. Here we have a case where the Master was very much against the applicant who sought permission to rely on an expert. An expert was not needed to report on market…
THE CURRENT IMPORTANCE OF PLEADINGS 9: THE PRIMARY FACTS UNDERLYING ALLEGATIONS OF DISHONESTY MUST BE PLEADED
Parties alleging dishonesty and fraud have to be very careful in the way they plead their case. These matters cannot be pleaded lightly, and there are professional obligations on the pleader to ensure that there is reasonably credible material that…
WITNESS STATEMENTS AND FINDINGS OF DISHONESTY BY AN EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNAL: EDMUND BURKE CITED “YOUR REPRESENTATIVE OWES YOU, NOT HIS INDUSTRY ONLY, BUT HIS JUDGEMENT: AND HE BETRAYS YOU INSTEAD OF SERVING YOU IF HE SACRIFIES IT TO YOUR OPINION”
It is rare for this blog to look at Employment Tribunal decisions. However examining the drafting of witness statements is part of its everyday fare. Here we look at a decision where the Tribunal was certain that witness statements had…
You must be logged in to post a comment.